Endovenous management of saphenous vein reflux. Endovenous Reflux Management Study Group

[Minimally invasive catheters in varicose vein treatment : New gold standard?]

BACKGROUND

Endovenous procedures are commonly used for varicose vein treatment.

OBJECTIVES

Types, functionality, and significance of endovenous devices.

METHODS

To describe the different endovenous devices, their mode of action, inherent risks and efficacy according to the literature.

RESULTS

Long-term data confirm that endovenous procedures are equally effective as open surgery. Postoperative pain is minimal and downtime shorter after catheter interventions.

CONCLUSION

Catheter-based endovenous procedures increase the diversity of varicose vein treatment options. They are preferred by patients due to less pain and shorter downtime.

Outcomes of endovenous laser ablation with additional iliac vein stenting of nonthrombotic lesions in patients presenting with active venous ulcers

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the clinical outcomes of superficial and perforator ablation and the effects on wound healing by adding iliac vein stenting of nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) in patients presenting with active venous ulcers.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who had presented with venous ulcers and had a diagnosis of NIVLs from January 2017 to December 2019. Patients with a >50% diameter reduction in the iliac vein as determined by computed tomography venography had undergone transfemoral venography for further confirmation. Patients were divided into the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) group and EVLA with stenting (EVLAS) group. The EVLA group had undergone endovascular laser treatment of superficial venous reflux, and the EVLAS group had undergone EVLA and stenting for NIVLs. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary endpoint was cumulative ulcer healing at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included complications, venous clinical severity score improvements, and pain scores during the follow-up period. Univariable and multivariable regression models were used to determine the refractory ulcer predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients were included, 93 in the EVLAS group and 64 in the EVLA group. Of the 93 patients in the EVLAS group and patients in the EVLA group, 30 (32.26%) and 17 (26.56%) had presented with iliac venous occlusion, respectively (P = .48). The mean percentage of stenosis was 78.0% ± 13.6% in EVLAS group and 77.0% ± 14.0% in the EVLA group (P = .36). No significant differences in the general preoperative data were observed between the two groups. Cumulative ulcer healing at 1 year was 86.8% and 65.6% in the EVLAS and EVLA groups, respectively (P = .001). After a mean follow-up of 22 months (median, 24 months), the EVLAS group had a significantly improved venous clinical severity score compared with the EVLA group (EVLAS group, 8.3; EVLA group, 11.7; P = .01). Multivariable analysis of the entire cohort showed that obesity and employment that requires standing were predictive of refractory ulcers and that iliac venous stent placement was a protective factor for ulcer healing.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study have suggested an association between improvement in the overall success of venous leg ulcer healing when including treatment of NIVLs with stents into a treatment plan that already includes saphenous and perforator vein ablation.

Internal compression therapy, a novel method in the treatment of deep venous insufficiency: 18-month clinical results

OBJECTIVE

To present 18-month clinical results for internal compression therapy (ICT) applied percutaneously and as a novel method in the treatment of primary deep venous insufficiency.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Thirty patients diagnosed with isolated primary femoral vein (FV) insufficiency between October 2017 and February 2018 were included in the study. Pre-procedural femoral vein diameters and reflux durations were measured. CEAP classification and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) were recorded. Pre-procedural CEAP classifications were CEAP 4 in nine patients and CEAP 3 in 21. Quality of life assessments were carried out using a Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-2). FV diameters were then reduced, and valve coaptation was established with the percutaneous application of hyaluronic acid and cyanoacrylate injected adjacent to a valve with non coapting leaflets. Venous diameters and reflux duration were again measured immediately after the procedure. Patients were followed-up at months 1, 6, and 18, at which times all parameters were re-evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighteen of the 30 patients were women, and 12 were men. The mean duration of the procedure was 22.7 ± 2.9 (20-30) min. Patients' FV diameters were 12.8 (11-14.7) mm before the procedure, 9.9 (9-11.5) mm immediately after, and also 9.9 (9-11.2) mm after 1.5 years (p < 0.001). Pre-procedural reflux duration ranged between 2 and 6 (median: 3) sec, and no reflux was observed in any patient immediately or one month after the procedure (p < 0.001). At 18-month follow-up, reflux lasting only 1 sec was determined in two patients. VCSS scores were 11 (10-12) pre-procedurally and 6 (4-9) at 18 months (p < 0.001). Venous Quality of Life scores were 32 (30-36) before the procedure and 18 (14-24) at 18 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary investigation of the injection of cyanoacrylate and hyaluronic acid around one valve in an incompetent FV can result in improved hemodynamics, CEAP, VCSS and patient QOL at 18 months, without complications.

Efficacy and safety assessment of an ultrasound-based thermal treatment of varicose veins in a sheep model

Purpose: Varicose veins are a common pathology that can be treated by endovenous thermal procedures like radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Such catheter-based techniques consist in raising the temperature of the vein wall to 70 to 120 °C to induce vein wall coagulation. Although effective, this treatment option is not suited for all types of veins and can be technically challenging.Materials and methods: In this study, we used High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) as a non-invasive thermal ablation procedure to treat varicose veins and we assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of the procedure in a sheep model. In vivo experiments were first conducted on two saphenous veins to measure the temperature rise induced at the vein wall during HIFU ablation and were compared with reported RFA-induced thermal rise. Thermocouples were inserted in situ to perform 20 measurements during 8-s ultrasound pulses at 3 MHz. Eighteen saphenous veins of nine anesthetized sheep (2-2.5 % Isoflurane) were then exposed to similar pulses (85 W acoustic, 8 s). After treatments, animals recovered from anesthesia and were followed up 30, 60 and 90 days post-treatment (n = 3 animals per group). At the end of the follow-up, vein segments and perivenous tissues were harvested and histologically examined.Results: Temperatures induced by HIFU pulses were found to be comparable to reported RFA treatments. Likewise, histological findings were similar to the ones reported after RFA and laser-based coagulation necrosis of the vein wall, thrombotic occlusions and vein wall fibrosis.Conclusion: These results support strongly the effectiveness and safety of HIFU for ablating non-invasively veins.

Thromboprophylaxis practice after outpatient endovenous thermal ablation

OBJECTIVE

The use of endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) for the treatment of truncal varicose veins has been increasing worldwide; however, uncertainty remains regarding the need for thromboprophylaxis and follow-up of patients undergoing this minimally invasive procedure. A nationwide survey of among physicians performing ETA was conducted to assess the thromboprophylaxis practice and follow-up protocols after ETA in Switzerland.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all ETA-certified physicians (n = 193) in Switzerland. The survey covered procedure type, thromboprophylaxis (including pharmacologic and compression therapy), duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations, and the management of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT).

RESULTS

Overall, 121 responses were received, for a response rate of 62.7%. Of the 121 respondents, 71 were vascular medicine specialists (58.7%) and 46 were general or vascular surgeons (38.0%), representing the two largest groups of specialists, followed by 2 dermatologists (1.7%) and 2 interventional radiologists (1.7%). Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after ETA was always used by 86 physicians (71.1%), nearly always by 8 (6.6%), frequently used by 5 (4.1%), rarely used by 21 (17.4%), and never by 1 physician (0.8%). A direct oral anticoagulant drug was the preferred type of thromboprophylaxis used by 92 physicians (77.3%). The first dose of thromboprophylaxis was mostly administered immediately after intervention by 53 physicians (53.7%). The duration of postablation thromboprophylaxis ranged from 1 to 21 days, with 7 to 10 days used by 57 physicians. Compression therapy was used by all physicians, with large variation in duration ranging from 1 to 42 days after a single ETA session and after ETA with concomitant phlebectomy. Postablation duplex ultrasonography was performed routinely by 120 respondents (99.2%), and 84 respondents (69.4%) performed two to three duplex ultrasound scans. Management of EHIT depended on the EHIT class and differed widely among the physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Our nationwide survey on thromboprophylaxis practices after ETA of truncal varicose veins in Switzerland showed that most physicians use pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, with a direct oral anticoagulant drug the preferred agent. However, the timing of the first dose and the duration of thromboprophylaxis varied widely among the respondents, reflecting the uncertainty in this domain owing to the absence of high-quality evidence-based guidelines.

European College of Phlebology guideline for truncal ablation

Background

The purpose of the guideline was to achieve consensus in the care and treatment of patients with chronic venous disease, based on current evidence.

Method

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane library up until 1 February 2019. Additional relevant literature were added through checking of references. Level of evidence was graded through the GRADE scale and recommendations were concluded.

Results

For the treatment of great and small saphenous vein reflux, endovenous ablation with laser or radiofrequency was recommended in preference to surgery or foam sclerotherapy. If tributaries are to be treated it should be done in the same procedure. Treatment with mecanicochemical ablation and glue can be used but we still need long term follow up results.

Conclusion

For the treatment of truncal varicosities, endovenous ablation with laser or radiofrequency combined with phlebectomies is recommended before surgery or foam.

Single-center retrospective review of early outcomes of radiofrequency ablation versus cyanoacrylate ablation of isolated great saphenous vein insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

Data comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) treatment of isolated great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency are limited. In this study, we present our early outcomes of RFA vs CAC for the treatment of GSV insufficiency.

METHODS

Between March 2015 and February 2017, a total of 159 patients underwent CAC (n = 75) or RFA (n = 84) for treatment of GSV insufficiency by a single surgeon. Medical data of the patients were retrieved from the institutional database and retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent lower extremity venous color duplex ultrasound examination. The Venous Clinical Severity Score and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire were used. Total closure rates of the GSV with RFA or CAC were recorded at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. Procedure-related adverse events and quality of life of the patients were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 46.33 ± 14.40 years in the CAC group and 48.09 ± 13.25 years in the RFA group (P = .4). The mean treated saphenous vein diameter was 7 mm in the CAC group and 7.25 mm in the RFA group (P = .07). The length of treated venous segment was 30 cm in both the CAC and RFA groups (P = .66). The mean duration of operation was 25 minutes in the CAC group and 35 minutes in the RFA group (P < .001). The incidence of adverse events was higher in the RFA group (P < .05). At 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the total closure rates between the CAC and RFA groups. There was no significant difference in the Venous Clinical Severity Score and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score between the groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results suggest that both RFA and CAC are effective in closure of the target GSV. Although the incidence of tumescent anesthesia-related and procedure-related complications is higher with the RFA technique, both techniques can be used safely with similar success rate and patient satisfaction.

Efficacy of subcutaneous lidocaine injection in venous insufficiency: a prospective, randomized, controlled study, and new treatment protocol

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous injection with lidocaine in patients with chronic venous insufficiency in the early stage. [Subjects and Methods] Patients (n=50) randomized to the treatment group received subcutaneous injections from a mixture of physiological saline sterile solution and lidocaine once a week to both legs below the knee for 5 sessions. Patients in the treatment group were also given ankle pumping exercises and compression stockings throughout the treatment. Patients randomized to the control group (n=50) received only ankle pumping exercises and compression stockings. Patients were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Chronic Venous Disease Quality of life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) for quality-of-life at months 1, 3, 6, at the end of month 12, and at the end of the injection treatment for 5 sessions. [Results] CIVIQ-20 and VAS results were significantly lower in the treatment group, than in the control group at months 1, 3 and 6. However, CIVIQ-20 and VAS results were not significantly different, compared with the pre-operative period at month 12. [Conclusion] We observed that 5-week subcutaneous lidocaine injection treatment was effective in patients who do not respond to oral medical treatment or in whom surgery is not considered.

Endovenous Laser Application

Introduction: Endoluminal vein treatment is a promising minimal invasive treatment option for peoples suffering from varicose veins. The basic mechanism underlying this procedure is to selectively induce heat in the vessel wall with the result of denaturation of proteins and shrinkage of collagen fibers due to energy application. So far energy could be applied either as RF-current, laser light or water steam. The different approaches to deliver such forms of energies are described.

Methods: Investigations on heat dependent vein tissue effects were performed. The degree of shrinkage and wall thickening due to heat induction was calculated. Tensile test on vein tissue were performed. Investigation using the radial emitting laser fibre in the ox-foot-model under reproducible condition were done and wavelengths dependent tissue reaction were explored.

Results: The experiments clearly demonstrate the degree of the shrinkage of length and diameter, the thickening of the vein wall, as well as the decrease of the elasticity of the tissue. The optical irradiation pattern of the radial emitting laser fiber serves for safe and reproducible energy application directly to the vein wall. Using a laser wavelength with high absorption by the tissue water needs reduced irradiation and irradiance compared to wavelengths with less water absorption. Conclusion: An experimental approach to improve laser application for endovenous varicose treatment is described. Laser parameters and treatment parameters were found which are now under clinical testing. The demonstrated tissue effects may help to find further arguments for clinical findings and sensations described by the patients during follow-up.

Prospective study of safety and effectiveness in the use of radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous vein ≥12 mm

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV) according to its diameter.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-center study including all patients treated with RFA from September 2014 to December 2015. The sample was divided according to the maximum GSV diameter measured on duplex ultrasound scan (A, <12 mm; B, ≥12 mm). Second-generation catheters (ClosureFast; Covidien, Mansfield, Mass) and tumescent anesthesia were used. Clinical stage (according to Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] classification), quality of life (measured by the 14-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire), and pain on visual analog scale were recorded before the procedure and during follow-up. Technical success was defined as GSV occlusion on duplex ultrasound scan. Safety was defined as incidence and type of adverse events at 10 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

There were 257 patients included, 183 (71%) with GSV diameter <12 mm and 74 (29%) with GSV diameter ≥12 mm. Mean GSV diameter was 8 ± 2 mm (4-11 mm) and 14 ± 2 mm (12-21 mm), respectively. Before the procedure, although a tendency toward greater clinical severity was observed in group B, no significant differences were found in the percentage of patients in C4 and C5 categories (A, 10%; B, 22%), median pain perception (A, 40; B, 39), or median quality of life value on the 14-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire scale (A, 27; B, 27). The rate of GSV occlusion at 1 month (n = 221) was 97% in group A and 100% in group B (P = .325); at 6 months (n = 158), it was 97% and 98%, respectively (P > .999); and at 12 months (n = 90), it was 99% and 96% (P = .481). There was a significant improvement in pain and quality of life in both groups, without differences between them. Finally, no differences between groups were found in terms of adverse events. Paresthesias were the most frequent event (A, 4%; B, 5%; P = NS), which disappeared during follow-up in half of the cases. Regarding major adverse events, there was only one case of deep venous thrombosis in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is safe and effective for the treatment of GSV ≥12 mm at midterm.

Incidence of venous leg ulcer healing and recurrence after treatment with endovenous laser ablation

BACKGROUND

The Effect of Surgery and Compression on Healing and Recurrence (ESCHAR) trial previously reported that patients with venous leg ulcers treated with saphenous stripping experienced a significantly reduced incidence of ulcer recurrence compared with patients treated with compression therapy. Most patients with leg ulcers and saphenous insufficiency are currently treated with endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), but little information is available on the long-term results after EVTA in Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) clinical class 5 (C5) and class 6 (C6) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all CEAP C5 or C6 patients treated with EVTA to define the incidence of ulcer healing and recurrence. Patients with active ulcers were managed weekly in a comprehensive wound center until healed. After healing, patients were treated with compression stockings and returned at 6-month intervals for follow-up. Time to healing and time to ulcer recurrence were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Risk factors were assessed to determine their association with ulcer recurrence.

RESULTS

EVTA of the great saphenous vein (n = 146), small saphenous vein (n = 20), or both (n = 7) was performed on 173 limbs with active (n = 72) or healed (n = 101) ulcers. Deep venous insufficiency was present in 54 cases (31.2%). Concomitant phlebectomy was performed in 59 limbs (34%). Median follow-up time was 25.2 months after EVTA. Venous ulcers healed after EVTA in 57% of cases at 3 months, 74% at 6 months, and 78% at 12 months. Ulcers recurred in 9% of patients at 1 year after EVTA, 20% at 2 years, and 29% at 3 years of follow-up. Ulcers recurred significantly more often in patients with deep venous insufficiency and in patients who did not undergo phlebectomy of associated varicose veins at the time of EVTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulcers recurred in a minority of CEAP clinical C5 and C6 patients after EVTA of the saphenous veins. Ulcer recurrence was less frequent in patients without concomitant deep venous reflux and in those treated with phlebectomy of varicose veins at the time of EVTA. We suggest consideration of phlebectomy at the time of EVTA for patients with C5 and C6 venous insufficiency, particularly in those with isolated superficial venous insufficiency.

Fate of Great Saphenous Vein After Radio-Frequency Ablation: Detailed Ultrasound Imaging

Radio-frequency ablation (RFA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) is an endovascular alternative to stripping. To determine long-term effectiveness, the fate of GSV treated for valvular insufficiency with RFA was evaluated in detail with ultrasound imaging (US). One hundred lower extremities were examined with high-resolution color flow US, an average of 8 months after RFA treatment of an incompetent GSV. For every cm of the RFA-treated segment, the US observation was classified as follows: absent, occluded, or recanalized. Lengths of vein segments in each class were added and percentages of absent, occluded, or recanalized segments were calculated. Five groups were identified. Group I (n=15): segment of treated GSV was absent. Group II (n=4): segment of treated GSV was visualized and occluded (these vein segments had no flow and were shrunk and “fibrotic” or thrombosed without clear evidence of significant shrinkage). Group III (n=1): segment of treated GSV was recanalized. Group IV (n= 27): segment of treated GSV was obstructed (absent or occluded). Group V (n=53): segment of treated GSV was partially recanalized, on average being 53% absent, 32% occluded, and 15% recanalized. Maximum recanalization was 50% of treated segment. RFA was successful in obliterating all of the GSV treated segment in 46% of veins (groups I, 15%, plus II, 4%, plus IV, 27%) and obliterated more than half of the treated vein segment in 53% of the cases (group V). A dynamic process of recanalization and thrombosis warrants further evaluation to determine if and how a collateral network may develop.

Endovenous Saphenous Ablation Corrects the Hemodynamic Abnormality in Patients with CEAP Clinical Class 3–6 CVI Due to Superficial Reflux

This investigation was designed to determine whether minimally invasive radiofrequency or laser ablation of the saphenous vein corrects the hemodynamic impact and clinical symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in CEAP clinical class 3–6 patients with superficial venous reflux. Patients with CEAP clinical class 3–6 CVI were evaluated with duplex ultrasound and air plethysmography (APG) to determine anatomic and hemodynamic venous abnormalities. Patients with an abnormal (>2 mL/second) venous filling index (VFI) and superficial venous reflux were included in this study. Saphenous ablation was performed utilizing radiofrequency (RF) or endovenous laser treatment (EVLT). Patients were reexamined within 3 months of ablation with duplex to determine anatomic success of the procedure, and with repeat APG to determine the degree of hemodynamic improvement. Venous clinical severity scores (VCSS) were determined before and after saphenous ablation. Eighty-nine limbs in 80 patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n=58), or EVLT (n=31). The average age of patients was 55 years and 66% were women. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between the groups treated with RFA or EVLT. Postoperatively, 86% of limbs demonstrated near total closure of the saphenous vein to within 5 cm of the saphenofemoral junction. Eight percent remained open for 5–10 cm from the junction, and 6% demonstrated minimal or no saphenous ablation. The VFI improved significantly after ablation in both the RF and EVLT groups. Postablation, 78% of the 89 limbs were normal, with a VFI <2 mL/second, and 17% were moderately abnormal, between 2 and 4 mL/second. VCSS scores (11.5 ±4.5 preablation) decreased significantly after ablation to 4.4 ±2.3. Minimally invasive saphenous ablation, using either RFA or EVLT, corrects or significantly improved the hemodynamic abnormality and clinical symptoms associated with superficial venous reflux in more than 90% of cases. These techniques are useful for treatment of patients with more severe clinical classes of superficial CVI.

Combined Endovenous Ablation and Transilluminated Powered Phlebectomy: Is Less Invasive Better?

This study was undertaken to evaluate the evolution of operative vein approaches from combined “open” saphenous stripping-stab avulsion phlebectomy to combined “minimally invasive” endovenous ablation-transilluminated powered phlebectomy with a focus on comparing clinical outcomes. All patients undergoing a combined operative approach for concomitant saphenous vein insufficiency and associated varicose tributary veins between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2005 were identified. Patients were stratified by operative approach into 3 groups: combined saphenous vein stripping-stab avulsion phlebectomy (STRIP-PHLEB); combined saphenous vein stripping-transilluminated phlebectomy (STRIP-TPP); and combined endovenous ablation-transilluminated phlebectomy (EVAB-TPP). Clinical volume, indications, technical details, and complications were retrospectively reviewed. Over the 8-year period, there were 72 limbs in 59 patients treated with STRIP-PHLEB, 92 limbs in 81 patients with STRIP-TPP, and 99 limbs in 76 patients with EVAB-TPP, with a time-dependent transition in operative techniques noted. There was no difference in distribution of CEAP clinical classification between groups, overall with most limbs in the C2-C4 categories (93.1%) and fewer in the C5-C6 categories (6.9%). There was no difference in overall complication rates between STRIP-PHLEB and EVAB-TPP, although the distribution of complications did shift with a trend toward more wound problems noted in procedures involving saphenous stripping (STRIP-PHLEB 5.6%, STRIP-TPP 6.5%, EVAB-TPP 2.0%; P = NS), and more hematomas in procedures involving transilluminated powered phlebectomy (STRIP-PHLEB 5.6%, STRIP-TPP 16.3%, EVAB-TPP 6.9%; P < .05; see Table 2). Complications associated with the endovenous ablation portion were low including technical inability to cannulate 1.6%, saphenous re-cannulation 2.4%, hematoma 2.4%, severe phlebitis 3.1%, venous thromboembolism 0.8%, and no wound or thermal injury problems. With the shift of combined operative vein approaches for concomitant saphenous vein insufficiency and varicose tributary veins towards “minimally invasive” techniques the overall complication rate has remained unchanged. While combined endovenous ablation-transilluminated phlebectomy offers some advantage of “less” invasiveness, this perceived benefit should be balanced against unchanged overall risk over traditional operative approaches.

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Varicose Veins: A Review of Endovenous Laser Treatment and Radiofrequency Ablation

Varicose veins are a common problem, conventionally treated by an operation. Within the last few years, minimally invasive techniques have been developed as alternatives to surgery in an attempt to reduce morbidity and improve recovery time. Radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation are the most promising of these new techniques. This review article looks at the evidence for these techniques and the clinical experience to date and discusses their role in the future treatment of varicose veins.

Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Varicose Veins

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is the most common vascular disease and represents a significant health care problem in the United States. Reflux of the great saphenous vein is the most common cause of this condition, whose symptoms include varicose veins, leg swelling, skin discoloration, and ulceration. The traditional treatment of this condition is saphenofemoral ligation with stripping of the saphenous vein followed by varicose vein removal, if necessary. Recent advances in minimally invasive endovenous therapy have led to the development of catheter-based radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the saphenous vein, which has gained an increasing acceptance in clinical practice. Endovenous RFA was introduced into clinical practice in Europe in 1998 and in the United States in 1999. Since then, over 250,000 procedures have been performed worldwide. Procedure safety and efficacy are well understood, with over 60 publications on the subject in the peer review literature, including four randomized trials comparing this technology with traditional vein stripping surgery. With the advent of tumescent anesthesia, the majority of RFA procedures are now performed in an office setting. This article examines the current technology using RFA in saphenous vein ablation with the Closure catheter system. Procedural techniques and clinical outcome using RFA in saphenous vein ablation are discussed. Clinical data comparing RFA versus saphenous vein stripping are also examined. Lastly, the clinical utility of a new RFA catheter, ClosureFAST, is discussed. ClosureFAST is a new generation of RFA catheter and has exhibited significant improvement in the ease of use and the procedure speed over the previous generation catheters while maintaining the favorable patient recovery profile seen with the RFA technology.

Effect of Diameter of Saphenous Vein on Stump Length after Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Vein

Purpose:

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has gained popularity for treatment of varicose veins. The diameter of the saphenous vein should be considered before RFA because occlusion of the vein may differ depending on its diameter. Until now, however, there have been few data about the correlation between the diameter of the saphenous vein and the stump length after RFA. The purpose of our study was to investigate its correlation.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective review was performed from prospectively collected data of RFA patients between March 2009 and December 2011. Preoperatively, the saphenous vein diameter was measured. Ablation was initiated 2 cm distal from the junction. Postoperatively, stump length was measured at 1 week and 6 months. After 2 years, we measured the length from the saphenofemoral junction to the leading point of occlusion for great saphenous vein, and length from the saphenopopliteal junction to the leading point of occlusion for small saphenous vein. The paired t-test, independent t-test, and correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

During the study period, RFA was performed in 201 patients. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis developed in 3 patients (1.5%). After 2 years, the stump length was obtained in 74 limbs. The mean diameter and stump length of the saphenous vein were 6.7±1.8 mm and 12.5±8.5 mm, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that the Pearson correlation coefficient of these factors was −0.017.

Conclusion:

There was no correlation between the diameter of saphenous vein and stump length.

Tumescentless endovenous radiofrequency ablation with local hypothermia and compression technique

Introduction

Modern surgical management of chronic venous insufficiency is possible since the development of catheter-based minimally invasive techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and the application of colour Doppler sonography. RFA technology requires the use of tumescent anaesthesia, which prolongs the operating time. Instilling tumescent anaesthesia percutaneously below the saphenous fascia is the steepest part of the learning curve. In our study, we compared operative and postoperative results of tumescentless RFA and RFA with tumescent anaesthesia, to investigate the necessity of tumescent anaesthesia.

Methods

A total of 344 patients with Doppler-confirmed great saphenous vein insufficiency underwent RFA between January and December 2012. Patients were divided into two groups according to anaesthetic management. Group 1 consisted of 172 patients: tumescent anaesthesia was given before the ablation procedure, and group 2 contained 172 patients: a local hypothermia and compression technique was used; no tumescent anaesthesia was administered. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used and ecchymosis scores of the patients were recorded. Clinical examinations were performed at each visit and Doppler ultrasonography was performed in the first and sixth month.

Results

Mean ablation time was significantly lower in group 2 compared to group 1 (7.2 vs 18.9 min; p < 0.05). Skin burn and paresthesia did not occur. The immediate occlusion rate was 100% for both groups. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of VAS and ecchymosis scores. All patients returned to normal activity within two days. The primary closure rate of group 1 was 98.2% and group 2 was 98.8% at six months, and there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Eliminating tumescent infusion is a desirable goal. Tumescentless endovenous RFA with local hypothermia and compression technique appears to be safe and efficacious. Our technique shortens the operation time and prevents patient procedural discomfort.

Venous disease in women: epidemiology, manifestations, and treatment

Until the past decade, venous disease was commonly underdiagnosed and undertreated due to lack of interest on the part of providers and to reluctance to undergo procedures on the part of patients. Modern venous interventions, improved diagnostic modalities, and increased awareness through education, training, and screening programs have all raised enthusiasm for venous disease in recent years. This has been crucial to gain control over a disease that affects a significant proportion of the population, with women being affected more than men. This article will discuss epidemiologic studies that highlight some of the gender-related issues and review the risk factors for venous disease. We will also discuss the physiologic venous changes that occur with pregnancy and highlight functional venous disease in women. Finally, we will review the indications for and treatment of superficial venous disease.

Patient-reported quality-of-life after radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins compared to conventional surgery

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported quality-of-life scores after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared to conventional surgery using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ).

METHODS

A postal questionnaire based on the AVVQ was sent out to 105 patients who underwent RFA and 50 patients who underwent surgery for varicose veins in our unit over a 14-month period. Responses were analysed according to sex and compared between the two groups to determine if there is a difference in the patient-reported quality-of-life scores. The mean AVVQ was calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 57 patients who underwent RFA and 27 patients who had surgery. In the domains of itch, discolouration, analgesia use, ankle swelling, cosmetic concern due to their varicose veins and reporting that their varicose veins affect their choice of clothing, there was a statistically significant difference favouring RFA in female patients. Conversely, in men, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of conventional surgery in the domains of pain, itch, analgesia use, cosmetic concern, affecting choice of clothing and affecting daily activities. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean AVVQ scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that for the female patients in our patient population, RFA results in generally better quality-of-life scores than conventional surgery when assessed using the disease-specific AVVQ. In this cohort, there was a statistically significant difference favouring conventional surgery in men. A number of potentially confounding variables have been discussed.

Factors Influencing the Incidence of Endovenous Heat-Induced Thrombosis (EHIT)

Introduction:

Extension of thrombus from the great saphenous vein into the common femoral vein can be an early postprocedural complication of endothermal ablation (ETA).

Methods:

A retrospective review was performed over a 3-year period. Intraprocedural ultrasound images demonstrating the distance of the catheter tip to the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) were available for 519 procedures, and this distance was measured.

Results:

Twenty-one (4.0%) cases of endovenous heat-induced thrombus (EHIT) were diagnosed. In all, 15 (6.4%) EHITs occurred following endovenous laser ablation and 6 (2.1%) after radiofrequency ( P = .02). Distance from catheter tip to SFJ, vein diameter, concomitant treatments, and perioperative anticoagulation were not significant risk factors for EHIT. Of the clinical factors assessed, gender ( P = .002), Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic and Pathophysiologic classification 3 to 6 ( P = .003), history of prior thrombosis ( P = .04), and Caprini thrombosis risk factor assessment score ( P = .004) were significant. On multivariate analysis, Caprini score ( P = .0002) and male gender ( P = .0003) remained significant.

Conclusions:

Male gender and increased Caprini score are predictive factors for EHIT following ETA.

The occlusion rate and patterns of saphenous vein after radiofrequency ablation

Purpose

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a widely accepted to treat the varicose vein. However, outcome studies for occlusion rate and patterns of the saphenous vein after RFA are scarce. The purpose of our study is to report the results of RFA in patients with varicose vein.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes after RFA using ClosureFAST (Covidien) catheter. We evaluated the occlusion rate and patterns with duplex scanning after RFA.

Results

A total of 200 limbs (148 patients) underwent RFA. The truncal veins were ablated in 163 great saphenous veins (GSV) and 41 small saphenous veins (SSVs). The mean age was 52.1 ± 11.9 years and female to male ratio was 125 : 87. At the mean follow-up of 13.9 months, the CEAP score, VCSS, and QoL score were significantly improved 2.33 ± 0.78 to 1.29 ± 0.96 (P < 0.0001), 3.48 ± 0.98 to 0.63 ± 1.16 (P < 0.0001), and 6.91 ± 6.69 to 3.38 ± 4.74 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The occlusion rate was 94.6% (53/56) in GSV and 94.5% (17/18) in SSV. The most common occlusion pattern in GSV was total occlusion of main trunk with patent superficial inferior epigastric vein in 41.1%. And, the most common pattern in SSV was the total occlusion of SSV with stump in 66.7%.

Conclusion

RFA is an effective modality in the treatment of varicose vein. At the mean follow-up of 13.9 months, the occlusion rate was 94.6%in GSV and 94.5% in SSV. There are several patterns of saphenous occlusion after RFA.

Anatomy and embryology of the small saphenous vein: nerve relationships and implications for treatment

The aim of this paper is to describe the anatomical relations of the small saphenous vein (SSV) in order to define the high-risk zones for the treatment of chronic venous disease. The SSV runs in the saphenous compartment demarcated by two fascia layers: a muscular fascia and a membranous layer of subcutaneous tissue. The clinician should be keenly aware of the anatomical pitfalls related to the close proximity of nerves to the SSV in order to avoid their injury: At the ankle, the origin of the SSV is often plexiform, located deep below the fascia, and the nerve is really stuck to the vein. The apex of the calf is an area of high risk due to the confluence of nerves which perforate the aponeurosis. Moreover, the possible existence of a 'short saphenous artery' which poses a high risk for injection of a sclerosing agent due to a highly variable disposition of this artery surrounding the SSV trunk. For this reason, procedures under echo guidance in this area are mandatory. The popliteal fossa is probably a higher risk zone due to the vicinity of the nerves: the small saphenous arch is close to the tibial nerve, or sometimes the nerve of the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. In conclusion, before foam injection or surgery, a triple mapping of the small saphenous territory is mandatory: venous haemodynamical mapping verifying the anatomy that is highly variable, nerve mapping to avoid trauma of the nerves and arterial mapping. This anatomical study will help to define the main high-risk zones.

Efeitos imediatos do eletrocautério endovascular em varizes de membros inferiores

OBJETIVOS: Determinar a importância das variáveis: Intensidade de Energia (I), Potência (P) e Tempo de Aplicação (T) nas alterações histológicas ocorridas em varizes de membros inferiores submetidas à eletrocauterização endovascular. MÉTODO: Estudo prospectivo experimental realizado em pacientes submetidos à eletrocauterização endovenosa de fragmento proximal da veia safena magna, de acordo com uma tabela de aleatorização - GI: I=0J, P=0W, T=15s; GII: I=300J, P=60W, T=5s; GIII: I=600J, P=60W, T=10s; GIV: I=900J, P=60W, T=15s; GV: I=450J, P=90W, T=5s; GVI: I=900J, P=90W, T=10s; GVII: I=1350J, P=90W, T=15s; GVIII: I=600J, P=120W, T=5s; GIX: I=1200J, P=120W, T=10s; GX: I=1800J, P=120W, T=15s. Os fragmentos foram submetidos a estudo anatomopatológico com o objetivo de analisar a profundidade das alterações tissulares, assim classificadas: Grupo A - endotélio e média, Grupo B - endotélio, média e adventícia. RESULTADOS: A intensidade das alterações histológicas - Grupo A e B - ocorridas nos fragmentos foram proporcionais à Intensidade de Energia de eletrocauterização (p=0,0001). Essa associação linear também pode ser verificada para as variáveis Potência (p=0,017) e Tempo de Aplicação (p=0,0001). O índice de correlação de Spearman foi maior para variável Tempo de Aplicação: 0,42269 (p=0,002) quando comparada com a variável Potência de Energia: 0,3542 (p=0,005). CONCLUSÃO: O Tempo de Aplicação de Energia é mais importante do que a Potência de Energia utilizada para uma mesma energia de eletrocauterização, na determinação da profundidade dos efeitos histológicos observados na parede das varizes de membros inferiores.

Benefit of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic on surgical site infection in varicose vein surgery

BACKGROUND

Ligation and division of the saphenofemoral junction (L/D SFJ) can protect against the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with greater saphenous vein (GSV) radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Although this procedure is regarded as clean from an infection standpoint, surgical site infection (SSI) can offset its thromboembolic benefit. We questioned whether SSI associated with L/D SFJ could be minimized by a single preoperative dose of antibiotic.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 902 ambulatory surgery patients who underwent 953 consecutive RFAs of the GSV in combination with L/D SFJ. A single dose of preoperative antibiotic was administered 1 hour before incision to some patients (n = 449 extremities), with all other patients receiving no antibiotic (n = 504). Primary outcome measure was SSI categorized based on type of therapy required (1: oral antibiotic, 2: hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic and/or wound debridement), with a secondary outcome measure of VTE.

RESULTS

VTE occurred in 10 patients (1%) and included three pulmonary emboli. The majority of VTE were calf deep vein thromboses (n = 7). SSI developed in 78 patients (8.2%) with groin, thigh, and calf distributions of 47%, 8%, and 45%, respectively. All category 2 infections (n = 8, 10%) occurred in control subjects, and the majority were located in the groin. Body mass index significantly increased risk for both overall (odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.14, P < 0.0001) and groin (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14, P = 0.01) SSI as well as VTE (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.30, P = 0.003). Diabetes was a significant risk for groin SSI (OR: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.44-18.26, P = 0.01). Antibiotic was associated with a significantly reduced risk for both overall (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.89, P = 0.02) and groin (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, P = 0.01) SSI. Furthermore, prophylaxis eliminated category 2 infections (P = 0.008) and was associated with a significantly lower risk of VTE (OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01-0.85, P = 0.01). Although SSI was noted more commonly in extremities with thromboembolic complications (20% [n = 2] vs. 8.1% [n = 76] in those without), this trend was not significant and could not account for the antibiotic effect on VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

L/D SFJ combined with RFA of the GSV, when treated as a clean procedure and not prophylaxed with antibiotic, carries a significant risk of SSI. While diabetes and high body mass index are patient-associated SSI risk factors, a single dose of preoperative antibiotic significantly reduces the rate of all infection, eliminates the danger of serious infection, and is associated with minimal VTE.

Update on endovenous radio-frequency closure ablation of varicose veins

Until recent years, the gold standard for treatment of truncal varicose veins has been high ligation and stripping of the saphenous vein. In the course of the last decade, new minimally invasive techniques based on endothermal ablation are progressively supplanting conventional surgery in the treatment of varicose veins. The endovenous treatment of varicose veins has been developed to reduce complications associated with conventional surgery and to improve quality of life. Radio frequency ablation (RFA) available since 1999 is now established as a safe and efficacious treatment for the ablation of refluxing saphenous veins. Among the emerging therapies, RFA with VNUS ClosureFAST is promising because it has eliminated almost all disadvantages associated with conventional surgery by "stripping" (bruises, scars, ecchymosis, inguinal recurrence, neovascularization, and mainly, prolonged incapacity) with an immediate occlusion rate close to 100%. When it is compared with endovenous laser ablation, RFA technology is associated with less postprocedural pain, less ecchymosis and tenderness, and better quality of life (QOL) measures. The aim of this article is to summarize the available evidence in the RFA treatment of varicose veins.

[New advances in the treatment of varicose veins: endovenous radiofrequency VNUS Closure®]

Lower limb varicose veins are often secondary to greater saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency. Technological development has led to the appearance of new minimally invasive treatments, such as endovenous radiofrequency ablation (ERFA). This almost completely eliminates the disadvantages associated with conventional surgery (haematomas, scars, inguinal neovascularisation, and a prolonged time off work). Furthermore, it gives a better quality of life, less pain and inflammation than the endolaser. We review ERFA and present our results as a pioneering group in Spain. Between January 2006 and 2011 we have treated 153 limbs with a mean GSV diameter of 6.8 mm (range 4.5-19). Tumescent anaesthesia was exclusively used in 71% of the procedures, and 98.5% without an inguinal surgical approach. Clinical and ultrasound follow-up with a prospective register was performed at 1 week, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually.

RESULTS

The occlusion rate of the treated vein was 97%, and there was a reflux rate of 6.6%. Inguinal neovascularisation was present on 0.7%. There was no neuritis, skin burns or deep vein thrombosis.

Saphenofemoral junction ligation and disconnection for varicose veins-a longitudinal study of cosmesis and function

BACKGROUND

Saphenofemoral junction ligation and disconnection (SFJLD) can be performed without exceeding the safe limits of local anesthetic if stripping of the long saphenous vein is not routine. We studied the early cosmetic and functional outcome of this procedure to identify the optimum time gap from SFJLD to multiple stab avulsions for varicose veins (VV).

METHODS

A series of patients with primary VV underwent SFJLD under local anesthetic as day case procedures. The volume of VV was quantified with a cartograph wheel, whereas the extent and severity of VV was assessed with four validated questionnaires: (a) Clinical Etiology Anatomy Pathology Score, (b) Venous Clinical Severity Score, (c) Aberdeen Varicose Vein Severity Score, and (d) Short Form 36. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The analysis of variance for repeated measures test was used; a p value <0.05 was found to be significant.

RESULTS

There were 48 patients (15 men; mean age: 54 years; 95% CI: 29-79). In all, 91% (n = 44) of patients had cosmetic and symptomatic improvement. The volume of VV reduced significantly over the three postoperative time points when compared with preoperatively (112 [95% CI: 88-136] vs. 75 [95% CI: 55-97] vs. 65 [95% CI: 43-87] vs. 58 [95% CI: 31-86], p = 0.001). Using the Clinical Etiology Anatomy Pathology, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Severity Score questionnaires, severity of VV improved postoperatively when compared withpreoperatively (p = 0.001 respectively). Improvements in quality of life were also noted postoperatively with the Short Form 36 questionnaire (p = 0.032). At maximum follow-up of 3 years, 13% (n = 6) had recurrent VV.

CONCLUSION

SFJLD confers cosmetic and symptomatic improvement at 1 month. Improvement is sustained on early follow-up, thereby allowing multiple stab avulsions to be performed as a staged procedure within 6 months. The rates of recurrent VV are acceptable on short-term follow-up.

Surgical management of varicose veins: meta-analysis

Open surgery remains the gold standard by which endovascular treatment of superficial chronic venous insufficiency is measured. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reviews the current evidence base, comparing open and endovascular treatment of varicose veins. Systematic review of studies reporting duplex scan follow-up after open surgical, laser (endovenous laser therapy [EVLT]), or radiofrequency (VNUS Closure device, VNUS Medical Technologies, San Jose, CA) treatment of refluxing great saphenous veins was completed. Primary outcome measures were occlusion and complication rates and time taken to resume work. No significant difference in recurrence rates at 3 months between open surgery and EVLT (RR 2.19, 95% CI 0.99-4.85, p = .05) or VNUS device (RR 7.57; 95% CI 0.42-136.02) were found. Return to work is significantly faster following VNUS (by 8.24 days; 95% CI 10.50-5.97) or EVLT (by 5.02 days; 95% CI 6.52-3.52). Endovascular treatment of varicose veins is safe and effective and offers the significant advantage of rapid recovery.

Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm)

OBJECTIVES

There have been few randomised studies comparing Radiofrequency Ablation(RFA) with other endovenous techniques. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether RFA of the great saphenous vein (GSV) was associated with less pain and bruising than endovenous laser ablation (EVLA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This trial had two cohorts--patients with bilateral GSV incompetence causing varicose veins (VV) and those with unilateral GSV VVs. In total 87 legs were treated in this study. Limbs in the bilateral group were treated with RFA in one leg and EVLA in the other. In the unilateral group limbs were randomised to RFA or EVLA. RFA was performed using the Celon RFiTT system (Teltow, Germany). EVLA was performed using an 810nm Laser (Biolitec AG, Germany). Phlebectomies were performed as required. Primary endpoints were patient assessed pain and bruising measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints were patency assessed by duplex ultrasound at 6 weeks and 6 months.

RESULTS

In the bilateral group, RFA resulted in significantly less pain than EVLA on days 2-11 postoperatively. RFA also resulted in significantly less bruising than EVLA on days 3-9. There were no significant differences in mean post operative pain, bruising and activity scores in the unilateral group. Both RFA and EVLA resulted in occlusion rates of 95% at 10 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA was less painful for patients than EVLA and produced less bruising in the postoperative period with comparable success rates but there was no difference in the unilateral group.

Effect of saphenous vein diameter on closure rate with ClosureFAST radiofrequency catheter

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of veins >12 mm in diameter has been a controversial subject since the first-generation device was submitted for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Veins >12 mm were excluded in the initial study. Many insurance carriers used >12 mm size as reason to not approve the procedure. As the concept of tumescent anesthesia was better communicated, RFA was used for large veins. The 12-mm size limit was not used in the studies for the newer ClosureFAST catheter approval, yet remains in force with some insurance companies. Our objective was to determine whether vein diameter >12 mm had effect on closure rates with the Closure-FAST catheter.

METHODS

ClosureFAST RFA was used to eliminate saphenous reflux in consecutive cases in 1 center. Retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively gathered data. Veins were divided into < or =12 mm diameter (group A) or >12 mm diameter (group B). Duplex scans were scheduled for 2 to 5 days and 6 months postprocedure.

RESULTS

A total of 338 great and small saphenous veins were treated, 246 saphenous veins in group A (mean 8 +/- 2 mm) and 96 in group B (mean 17 +/- 4 mm). Early duplex showed complete closure in 231 veins in group A (94%) and 92 veins in group B (96%; NS). The remaining veins showed partial closure with none showing retrograde flow. Six-month duplex scans were completed in 155 veins. Complete closure was seen in 110 veins in group A (98%) and 43 veins in group B (100%; NS). All veins partially open on early scan had closed by 6 months. The 2 veins open at 6 months in group A were closed on initial scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Vein diameter >12 mm had no effect on closure rate with the ClosureFAST catheter.

Radiofrequency ablation for uncomplicated varicose veins

In recent years, minimally invasive endovenous treatments have gained popularity in the treatment of superficial venous reflux. The perceived advantages of endovenous therapy include reduced pain, high vein occlusion rates, and early return to work and normal activities. Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) involves the delivery of thermal energy from a bipolar catheter to the venous segment to be treated. This technique has been available since 1998 and numerous devices and catheters are now produced. Numerous prospective and randomized studies have compared the effectiveness of RFA with traditional and endovenous procedures. In this article, the available evidence for clinical effectiveness, quality of life and cost gains following endovenous RFA is summarized. The scientific principles behind RFA and technical procedural considerations are discussed and standards of care for the delivery of endovenous RFA are proposed.

Endovenous laser procedure in a clinic room: feasibility and side effects study of 1700 cases

Objectives

To assess the feasibility of saphenous veins ablation by laser in a clinic room. To study immediate and short term (1 to 6 months) complications and to pinpoint those that could be directly linked to this environment. Efficacy of the technique should also be documented.

Methods

Retrospective study (22 centres) carried out in France and Switzerland. Patients with insufficiency of great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV). Clinical stages of clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathophysiological classification (CEAP) were C2 to C6. Endovenous laser procedures were performed outside an operating theatre, under local anaesthesia and without high ligation. Efficacy criteria: occlusion of the vein and disappearance of the pathological reflux (duplex scan assessment). The side effects and complications were studied.

Results

A total of 1703 procedures (1422 patients) were performed; 74% of the patients were women. The mean age of the patients was 57. A total of 1394 GSV and 309 SSV were treated (mean diameters 7.2 mm and 6.4 mm, respectively). Overall success level was 97% and mean length of veins treated was 40 cm for GSV and 21 cm for SSV. Energy applied in joules per centimeter was homogenous (mean and median 64 for GSV and 65 for SSV). Complications were rare and ‘simple’ apart from one pulmonary embolism which occurred 10 days after a GSV procedure, although no deep vein thrombus was found. A total of two infections were observed: one was an infection localized at the site of access and the other was erysipelas.

Conclusion

Except 2 limited infections (0.1%), this large retrospective study of laser procedures performed outside the operating theatre did not reveal any significant specific complications as regards the environment required. The efficacy results were equivalent to those found in the literature. Regarding cost and constraints induced by operating theatre environment, the clinic room should be able to offer an easier and economic alternative option for saphenous veins ablation with laser.