1
|
Wendt G, Faul F. Binocular luster elicited by isoluminant chromatic stimuli relies on mechanisms similar to those in the achromatic case. J Vis 2024; 24:7. [PMID: 38536184 PMCID: PMC10985784 DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.3.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The phenomenon of binocular luster can be evoked by simple dichoptic center-surround stimuli showing a luminance contrast difference between the eyes. Previous findings support the idea that this phenomenon is mediated by a low-level conflict mechanism that integrates the monocular signals from different types of contrast detector cells. Also, isoluminant stimuli with different chromatic contrasts between eyes can trigger sensations of luster. Here, we investigate whether the lustrous impression in such purely chromatic stimuli depends on interocular contrast differences and in particular on interocular contrast polarity pairings in a similar way as in the achromatic case. In our experiments, we measured the magnitude of the lustrous response using a series of isoluminant dichoptic center-ring-surround stimuli with varying ring width whose chromatic properties were varied along the red-green and blue-yellow cardinal directions. The trends in the data were very similar to those of our former study with achromatic stimuli, indicating similar mechanisms in both cases. The empirical luster data could also be predicted fairly well by a chromatic version of our interocular conflict model (with overall R2 values between 0.577 and 0.639), for which two different receptive field models were used, simulating the behavior of color-sensitive double-opponent cells in V1.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sakano Y, Ando H. Conditions of a Multi-View 3D Display for Accurate Reproduction of Perceived Glossiness. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS 2022; 28:3336-3350. [PMID: 33651695 DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2021.3063182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Visualizing objects as they are perceived in the real world is often critical in our daily experiences. We previously focused on objects' surface glossiness visualized with a 3D display and found that a multi-view 3D display reproduces perceived glossiness more accurately than a 2D display. This improvement of glossiness reproduction can be explained by the fact that a glossy surface visualized by a multi-view 3D display appropriately provides luminance differences between the two eyes and luminance changes accompanying the viewer's lateral head motion. In the present study, to determine the requirements of a multi-view 3D display for the accurate reproduction of perceived glossiness, we developed a simulator of a multi-view 3D display to independently and simultaneously manipulate the viewpoint interval and the magnitude of the optical inter-view crosstalk. Using the simulator, we conducted a psychophysical experiment and found that glossiness reproduction is most accurate when the viewpoint interval is small and there is just a small (but not too small) amount of crosstalk. We proposed a simple yet perceptually valid model that quantitatively predicts the reproduction accuracy of perceived glossiness.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wendt G, Faul F. A simple model of binocular luster. J Vis 2022; 22:6. [PMID: 36074478 PMCID: PMC9469037 DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.10.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The dichoptic combination of simple center–surround stimuli showing a contrast difference between eyes can trigger a lustrous impression in the fused percept, particularly when the contrast polarities in the two input images are of opposite sign. Recent developments suggest that the phenomenon of binocular luster results from a neural conflict between ON and OFF visual pathways at an early binocular level. Support for this idea was found in a previous study in which the empirical luster judgments strongly correlated with the predictions of an interocular conflict model which was based on such ON–OFF pairings. However, our original model could not account for the fact that weaker lustrous sensations can also be evoked by stimuli showing contrast polarities of same sign between eyes. In the present study we present an improved model that also includes ON–ON and OFF–OFF pairings. The predictive power of this model was tested in a series of four experiments, using a total of about 500 different center–ring–surround configurations as test stimuli. We found that, overall, our modified version accounts for more than 80% of the variance in the empirical luster judgments and that the former problems could be largely resolved. Our results further suggest a nonlinear transducer function for the binocular conflict signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnar Wendt
- Institut für Psychologie, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,
| | - Franz Faul
- Institut für Psychologie, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wendt G, Faul F. Binocular luster - A review. Vision Res 2022; 194:108008. [PMID: 35182893 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Binocular luster is a visual phenomenon that can be elicited by dichoptic stimuli showing an interocular difference in color or luminance contrast. For instance, when the two eyes are presented with simple center-surround stimuli in which the center patch in one eye is brighter and in the other eye darker than the common surround, the center patch in the fused percept assumes a lustrous appearance reminiscent of metal or graphite. Soon after the discovery of this phenomenon in the mid-19th century, it was intensively studied and several explanations were proposed. After this initial phase, however, research interest waned significantly. Stimulated by new insights into related phenomena and the underlying physiological mechanisms, the last 20 years have seen an increase in research activity in this field, which has considerably expanded our understanding of binocular luster. In this paper, we provide a detailed review of research on binocular luster over the past 170 years. We present and discuss the existing findings in a number of separate sections, dealing with 1) the phenomenology of binocular luster, 2) different theories that have been proposed, 3) several factors influencing the lustrous impression, 4) the relationship between binocular luster and binocular rivalry, 5) the current understanding of its neural basis, and 6) potential applications based on binocular luster.
Collapse
|
5
|
The role of contrast polarities in binocular luster: Low-level and high-level processes. Vision Res 2020; 176:141-155. [PMID: 32890940 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The binocular fusion of two center-surround configurations, where one center is brighter, the other darker than the common surround, leads to a strong impression of luster in the central patch. Without reversed contrast polarities of the center patches, this impression is much weaker or even absent. However, we observed that in the latter case the perceived luster can be considerably enhanced by enclosing both centers with a thin ring of fixed luminance. Compared to the standard stimulus, this center-ring-surround configuration shows much less binocular rivalry and the luster has also a different, more glass-like material quality. In a psychophysical experiment, we examined how the magnitude of the lustrous response depends on the width of the ring, both in stimuli with reversed and consistent contrast polarities. It has been proposed that binocular luster results from a neuronal conflict between ON and OFF visual pathways. To test this hypothesis with respect to our data, we developed a simple model to estimate the amount of interocular conflict resulting from a given binocular stimulus pair and applied it to all stimuli used in the experiment. We found strong correlations between the interocular conflict measure and the strength of luster observed in the experiment, suggesting that a common low-level mechanism determines the magnitude of the lustrous response. Regarding the differences in the perceived material quality of the lustrous impressions, we discuss evidence indicating that high-level processes are involved that promote the visual system's interpretation of the ring-stimuli as a certain depth-segmented 3D scene.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wendt G, Faul F. Factors Influencing the Detection of Spatially-Varying Surface Gloss. Iperception 2019; 10:2041669519866843. [PMID: 31523415 PMCID: PMC6732868 DOI: 10.1177/2041669519866843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the ability of human observers to detect spatial inhomogeneities in the glossiness of a surface and how the performance in this task depends on several context factors. We used computer-generated stimuli showing a single object in three-dimensional space whose surface was split into two spatial areas with different microscale smoothness. The context factors were the kind of illumination, the object's shape, the availability of motion information, the degree of edge blurring, the spatial proportions between the two areas of different smoothness, and the general smoothness level. Detection thresholds were determined using a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task implemented in a double random staircase procedure, where the subjects had to indicate for each stimulus whether or not the surface appears to have a spatially uniform material. We found evidence that two different cues are used for this task: luminance differences and differences in highlight properties between areas of different microscale smoothness. While the visual system seems to be highly sensitive in detecting gloss differences based on luminance contrast information, detection thresholds were considerably higher when the judgment was mainly based on differences in highlight features, such as their size, intensity, and sharpness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnar Wendt
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut
für Psychologie, Kiel, Germany
| | - Franz Faul
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut
für Psychologie, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hetley RS, Stine WW. At least two distinct mechanisms control binocular luster, rivalry, and perceived rotation with contrast and average luminance disparities. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0215716. [PMID: 31112553 PMCID: PMC6529001 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
When one views a square-wave grating and dichoptically changes the average luminance or contrast of the monocular images, at least three perceptual phenomena might occur. These are the Venetian blind effect, or a perceived rotation of the bars around individual vertical axes; binocular luster, or a perceived shimmering; and binocular rivalry, or an alternating perception between the views of the two eyes. Perception of luster and rivalry occur when the "light bars" in the grating dichoptically straddle the background luminance (one eye's image has a higher luminance than the background and the other eye's image has a lower luminance than the background), with little impact from the "dark bars." Perception of rotation, on the other hand, is related to average luminance or contrast disparity, independent of whether or not the "light bars" straddle the background luminance. The patterns for perceived rotation versus binocular luster and binocular rivalry suggest at least two separate mechanisms in the visual system for processing luminance and contrast information over and above their differing physiological states suggested by their different appearances. While luster and rivalry depend directly on the relation between stimuli and the background, perceived rotation depends on the magnitude of the luminance or contrast disparity, as described by the generalized difference model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard S. Hetley
- Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States of America
| | - Wm Wren Stine
- Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wendt G, Faul F. Differences in Stereoscopic Luster Evoked by Static and Dynamic Stimuli. Iperception 2019; 10:2041669519846133. [PMID: 31205668 PMCID: PMC6537268 DOI: 10.1177/2041669519846133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared the classic static stereoscopic luster phenomenon with a recently described dynamic variant ("counter modulation") to investigate whether they are related to the same or different processes. In the experiments, we presented pairs of center-surround stimuli haploscopically and measured the effect of the contrast between center colors on perceived luster. The center colors were either static or temporally modulated. In addition, we examined five color conditions (one achromatic, two equiluminant, and two mixed conditions) and three background conditions that influence the channel-wise polarities of the contrast of the two centers to the common surround. The results for static and dynamic stimuli differed in several ways, suggesting that they depend on different mechanisms: Compared with the static version, in dynamic stimuli, luster was perceived at markedly lower contrasts, did not depend on the sign of the contrast polarities, and appeared more steady. However, both phenomena seem also similar in some respects: In both cases, equiluminant stimuli led to lustrous impressions that were considerably less strong than those evoked by stimuli containing luminance variation, and the strength of the perceived luster was generally boosted with reversed contrast polarities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Franz Faul
- Institut für Psychologie,
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Georgeson MA, Wallis SA, Meese TS, Baker DH. Contrast and lustre: A model that accounts for eleven different forms of contrast discrimination in binocular vision. Vision Res 2016; 129:98-118. [PMID: 27576193 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Revised: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Our goal here is a more complete understanding of how information about luminance contrast is encoded and used by the binocular visual system. In two-interval forced-choice experiments we assessed observers' ability to discriminate changes in contrast that could be an increase or decrease of contrast in one or both eyes, or an increase in one eye coupled with a decrease in the other (termed IncDec). The base or pedestal contrasts were either in-phase or out-of-phase in the two eyes. The opposed changes in the IncDec condition did not cancel each other out, implying that along with binocular summation, information is also available from mechanisms that do not sum the two eyes' inputs. These might be monocular mechanisms. With a binocular pedestal, monocular increments of contrast were much easier to see than monocular decrements. These findings suggest that there are separate binocular (B) and monocular (L,R) channels, but only the largest of the three responses, max(L,B,R), is available to perception and decision. Results from contrast discrimination and contrast matching tasks were described very accurately by this model. Stimuli, data, and model responses can all be visualized in a common binocular contrast space, allowing a more direct comparison between models and data. Some results with out-of-phase pedestals were not accounted for by the max model of contrast coding, but were well explained by an extended model in which gratings of opposite polarity create the sensation of lustre. Observers can discriminate changes in lustre alongside changes in contrast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Georgeson
- School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Stuart A Wallis
- School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tim S Meese
- School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel H Baker
- Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|