Quantitative analysis of illusory movement: spatial filtering and line localization in the human visual system

Retinal Vessel Caliber Measurement Bias in Fundus Images in the Presence of the Central Light Reflex

Purpose

To investigate the agreement between a fundus camera and a scanning laser ophthalmoscope in retinal vessel caliber measurements and to identify whether the presence of the central light reflex (CLR) explains potential discrepancies.

Methods

For this cross-sectional study, we obtained fundus camera and scanning laser ophthalmoscope images from 85 eyes of 85 healthy individuals (aged 50-65 years) with different blood pressure status. We measured the central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal artery vein equivalent (CRVE) with the Knudtson-Parr-Hubbard algorithm and assessed the CLR using a semiautomatic grading method. We used Bland-Altman plots, 95% limits of agreement, and the two-way mixed effects intraclass correlation coefficient for consistency [ICC(3,1)] to describe interdevice agreement. We used multivariable regression to identify factors associated with differences in between-device measurements.

Results

The between-device difference in CRAE (9.5  µm; 95% confidence interval, 8.0-11.1  µm) was larger than the between-device difference in CRVE (2.9  µm; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.5  µm), with the fundus camera yielding higher measurements (both P < 0.001). The 95% fundus camera-scanning laser ophthalmoscope limits of agreement were -4.8 to 23.9  µm for CRAE and -12.0 to 17.8  µm for CRVE. The corresponding ICCs(3,1) were 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.92) and 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.94). The between-device CRAE difference was positively associated with the presence of a CLR (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Fundus cameras and scanning laser ophthalmoscopes yield correlated but not interchangeable caliber measurements. The CLR induces bias in arteriolar caliber in fundus camera images, compared with scanning laser ophthalmoscope images.

Translational Relevance

Refined measurements could yield better estimates of the association between retinal vessel caliber and ophthalmic or systemic disease.

Influence of coherence length, signal-to-noise ratio, log transform, and low-pass filtering on layer thickness assessment with OCT in the retina

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the retina are inevitably affected by the finite width of the coherence function and noise. To make low-reflective layers visible, the raw OCT signal is log transformed; to reduce the effect of noise the images can be low-pass filtered. We determined the effects of these operations on layer thickness assessment, as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), by performing measurements in a phantom eye and modeling. The log transform appeared to be the key factor in a SNR-dependent overestimation of peak widths and a less predictive bias in the widths of low-reflective layers.

Lateral Inhibition in the Human Visual System in Patients with Glaucoma and Healthy Subjects: A Case-Control Study

In glaucoma, the density of retinal ganglion cells is reduced. It is largely unknown how this influences retinal information processing. An increase in spatial summation and a decrease in contrast gain control and contrast adaptation have been reported. A decrease in lateral inhibition might also arise. This could result in a larger than expected response to some stimuli, which could mask ganglion cell loss on functional testing (structure-function discrepancy). The aim of this study was to compare lateral inhibition between glaucoma patients and healthy subjects; we used a case-control design. Cases (n = 18) were selected to have advanced visual field loss in combination with a normal visual acuity. Controls (n = 50) were not allowed to have symptoms or signs of any eye disease. Lateral inhibition was measured psychophysically on a computer screen, with (1) a modified illusory movement experiment and (2) a contrast sensitivity (CS) test. Illusory movement was quantified by nulling it with a real movement; measure of lateral inhibition was the amount of illusory movement. CS was measured at 1 and 4 cycles per degree (cpd); measure of lateral inhibition was the difference between log CS at 4 and 1 cpd. Both measures were compared between cases and controls; analyses were adjusted for age and gender. There was no difference between cases and controls for these two measures of lateral inhibition (p = 0.58 for illusory movement; p = 0.20 for CS). The movement threshold was higher in cases than in controls (p = 0.008) and log CS was lower, at both 1 (-0.20; p = 0.008) and 4 (-0.28; p = 0.001) cpd. Our results indicate that spatially antagonistic mechanisms are not specifically affected in glaucoma, at least not in the intact center of a severely damaged visual field. This suggests that the structure-function discrepancy in glaucoma is not related to a decrease in lateral inhibition.