Antenatal transfer of rural women: how does the NSW Inpatient Statistics Collection compare with an audit of hospital records?

Clinical features and outcomes of pregnancies complicated by pre-ecplampsia necessitating in-utero transfer

OBJECTIVES

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is associated with significant risks of adverse perinatal outcomes, often necessitating transfer to a higher level of care for specialist perinatal management. In Victoria, Australia, the Paediatric Infant Perinatal Emergency Retrieval (PIPER) coordinates in-utero transfers of high-risk pregnancies. Our objectives were to report the clinical features and outcomes of women referred to PIPER with a primary diagnosis of PE, and subsequently transferred in-utero.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective audit of consecutive pregnancies referred to PIPER in 2013-2014 with a primary diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, ≥20 weeks' gestation and transferred in-utero.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Severity of disease, gestational age, transfer details and outcome until 7 days post transfer.

RESULTS

Over two years, 244 women were referred to PIPER with PE; 199 (82%) were subsequently transferred in-utero. Severe PE was diagnosed in 146 (73%) women. Overall, 64% presented 'early' (<32 weeks' gestation). Only 6% were ≥37 weeks. All but 2 women <32 weeks were transferred to a tertiary perinatal centre, compared with 39% of women ≥32 weeks. Within 7 days, 153/199 (77%) delivered, 10% remained in-patients and 12.5% were discharged. There were 165 livebirths and 3 stillbirths, with a mean gestational age of 30.7 weeks (SD 3.3 weeks). Twenty-nine women required high dependency or intensive care admission. No maternal deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Women referred to PIPER predominantly presented with early onset, severe PE and most delivered within 7 days of transfer. Data from this study provides important information for obstetric service planning in Victoria and comparable regions.

Multifetal pregnancies: preterm admissions and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To describe the rates of antenatal hospital admission during twin or higher order multifetal pregnancies, and the admission outcomes as discharge undelivered, transfer to higher care, or spontaneous or elective delivery.

METHODS

Cohort study using linked birth and hospital data. The cohort comprised women who gave birth to twins or higher order multiple infants of≥24 weeks gestation in 2001-2008 and who were admitted to hospital in weeks 20-36 of the pregnancy.

RESULTS

In 63.4% of 10 779 twin pregnancies and 99.5% of 197 triplet and quadruplet pregnancies, the woman was admitted to hospital at least once in weeks 20-36 of the pregnancy, for a total 10 985 admissions. Almost half the admissions (46.3%) ended in discharge without delivery, 10.7% in transfer to higher care, 21.1% in spontaneous labour and birth, and 21.8% in elective delivery (induction or prelabour Caesarean section). The reason for admission was preterm labour in 34.2% of admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital admission during pregnancy is common for women with multifetal pregnancies, with many of these admissions resulting in preterm birth. This is the first study to report the rate of pregnancy admissions for women with multifetal pregnancies, and provides a baseline for future studies of hospital use in this population.

Addressing the workplace needs of Western Australian midwives: a Delphi study

Objective. To determine the workplace needs of Western Australian midwives working in public metropolitan secondary hospitals. Method. Using a three-round Delphi approach, Round 1 incorporated focus groups and a questionnaire. Fifteen focus groups were conducted with midwives also having the option of contributing through an open-ended questionnaire. During Round 2, 38 items reflecting seven themes were prioritised with a final ranking performed in Round 3. In total, 114 midwives participated in Round 1, 72 in Round 2 and 89 in Round 3. Results. During Round 1, workplace needs identified as being met included: working across all areas of midwifery; ability to work in areas of interest; opportunity to work with low to moderate risk women; supportive colleagues; accessible parking; hospital close to home and friendly work atmosphere. Round 2 items revealed the five top unmet needs as: adequate midwifery staff coverage; access to maintained equipment; competitive pay scales; patient safety issues and opportunities to implement midwifery models. The top ranked needs from Round 3 included: recognising the unpredictable nature of midwifery services; provision of competent medical coverage, and adequate midwifery staff coverage. Conclusions. Demand for maternity services is unpredictable; however, in order to maintain a sustainable maternity workforce, WA midwives’ prioritised needs would suggest health management focus upon expanding the availability of midwifery models of care, fostering flexible working conditions and ensuring collaboration between maternity health professionals occurs within clinically safe staffing levels. What is known about the topic? Dissatisfaction with working conditions, staff shortages, and feeling undervalued or unsupported contribute to healthcare workforce attrition. However, positive practice environments and health service management and leadership can influence employee satisfaction and retention. What does this paper add? These insights into Western Australian midwives’ met and unmet needs within the context of public metropolitan secondary units provide a more practical basis for the revision of work conditions than has been reported previously. What are the implications for practitioners? Our findings reinforce the urgent need to address the midwifery workforce priorities highlighted in the Australian National Maternity Services Plan. Specifically, this study strongly underscores the requirement to expand the availability of midwifery models of care, foster flexible working conditions and ensure collaboration between maternity health professionals occurs within clinically safe staffing levels.

The missing element: consanguinity as a component of genetic risk assessment

PURPOSE

There are no clinical practice data regarding collecting information on consanguinity as part of family history, despite its relevance for identifying at-risk pregnancies. We determined current practice and influencing factors in documenting consanguinity as part of pregnancy assessment by midwives, key health professionals in socialized medicine.

METHODS

Data were gathered from midwives in Victoria, Australia, which contains an ethnically heterogeneous population. Current practice and issues influencing practice including frequency of enquiry and attitudes regarding collecting consanguinity and family history information were documented.

RESULTS

Family history is collected by midwives, but is restricted to medical information only. Although 65.1% of midwives collect family history, only 6.4% ask about consanguinity. Direct questioning about consanguinity was seen to be difficult, reflecting social taboos, with discussion usually prompted by patient disclosure. The factor significantly associated with clinical practice in multivariate analysis was midwives' lack of confidence (adjusted odds ratio: 5.3 [95% confidence interval 1.3-22.1]) in discussing consanguinity.

CONCLUSIONS

Organizational and social barriers prevent collecting information about consanguinity in midwifery practice, restricting identification of at-risk pregnancies. Change theory is applied to inform strategies to enhance the identification of consanguineous couples.

Neonatal surgery in New South Wales--what is performed where?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe what surgical procedures are performed in the neonatal period in New South Wales (NSW) and where they are performed.

METHODS

Population-based descriptive study was conducted in NSW in a 2-year period from July 1, 1996 to June 30, 1998, inclusive, using information from the NSW Health Department's Inpatient Statistics Collection. All neonates undergoing major surgery (excluding circumcisions) in NSW.

RESULTS

In the first 4 weeks of life, 990 (0.6%) neonates underwent surgery. The most common surgical procedures were gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hernia, genitourinary, and neurosurgical. Frenotomy accounted for 5% of all surgical procedures. Whereas 75% of neonatal surgery (including 88% of gastrointestinal and 97% cardiovascular surgery) occurs in children's hospitals, only 13% of the babies requiring surgery are born in the co-located obstetric hospitals. Perinatal centers accounted for 5.3% of surgery; urban hospitals for 8.4%; rural hospitals, 5.5%, and private hospitals, 6.4%. The mortality rate in the neonatal period was 3.0% overall.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first review of major neonatal surgery in Australia and provides baseline data for future comparisons. Whereas most neonates had surgery in a children's hospital, few of them were born in the most appropriate place, the co-located obstetric hospital. Parents should be informed of the level of institutional surgical expertise and be involved in the decision-making regarding the place of surgery for their infant. Parents and children have a right to expect the best possible results.

Antenatal transfer of rural women to perinatal centres. High Risk Obstetric and Perinatal Advisory Working Group

The aim of this study was to describe antenatal transfers of rural women to perinatal centres, and among transferred women, to assess the use of selected evidence-based therapies and determine the predictors of preterm and imminent births. The clinical records of rural women antenatally transferred to perinatal centres in NSW and the ACT during 1997-1998 were reviewed. Of 453 rural antenatal transfers, 408 (90%) were emergency transfers. Increasing remoteness was associated with increased rates of antenatal transfer but not with a lower probability of giving birth. Of all transferred women, 64% delivered; 58% of preterm transfers delivered preterm and of those delivering preterm, 76% delivered within 7 days. Although the main reason for antenatal transfer was the possibility of preterm birth, women presenting with preterm contractions only were less likely to deliver preterm (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.4) or < or = 7 days (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) than women with any other presenting symptoms. The overall usage of effective interventions (antenatal steroids, antibiotics for PPROM and beta-mimetic tocolysis to delay birth) among antenatally transferred rural women was high, but there is room for increased uptake prior to transfer.