1
|
Uzunbay Z, Elliott RA, Taylor S, Sepe D, Ferraro EJ. Accuracy of medication labels on community pharmacy-prepared dose administration aids: An observational study. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2023; 11:100318. [PMID: 37662699 PMCID: PMC10474138 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hospital prescribers often use the labels on multicompartment compliance aids or monitored dosage systems, known in Australia as dose administration aids (DAAs), as a trusted source of information about patients' medication regimens taken in the community. Aim The primary aim was to explore the prevalence and nature of labelling incidents on community pharmacy-prepared DAAs. Methods A convenience sample of 100 adult patients admitted to a metropolitan teaching hospital who used a community pharmacy-prepared DAA at home was recruited. Patients were excluded if their DAAs were not brought to hospital. As part of usual care, a pharmacist took a best possible medication history (BPMH) using multiple information sources. This 'gold standard' BPMH was compared to the regimen listed on the DAA summary label and the DAA contents. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients whose DAA summary label(s) had one or more incidents for DAA packed medications. DAA label incident was defined as incorrect, missing or illegible/ambiguous medication name, strength, dose or dose-form when compared to the BPMH and DAA contents. Secondary outcomes were compliance with best-practice guidelines for labelling DAAs; and percentage of patients with a DAA packing error. Results The 100 patients used 110 DAAs, packed by 75 community pharmacies. Four (4.0%) patients had no medication summary label on their DAAs. Of the 96 patients whose DAA(s) had a summary label, 82 (85.4%) had one or more summary label incidents. The most prevalent incidents were 'illegible, ambiguous or missing medication details', 'truncated medication name' and 'omission of a medication'. The most prevalent guideline non-compliance was not including generic medication names (68% DAA-packed medications). Two DAA packing errors were identified. Conclusion A high prevalence of DAA labelling incidents was identified. Improved DAA labelling software functionality, more robust pharmacy procedures and pharmacy staff education are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zulal Uzunbay
- Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Rohan A. Elliott
- Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Simone Taylor
- Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Daniela Sepe
- Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Emily J. Ferraro
- Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lei KC, Loi CI, Cen Z, Li J, Liang Z, Hu H, Chan TF, Ung COL. Adopting an electronic medication administration system in long-term care facilities: a key stakeholder interview study in Macao. Inform Health Soc Care 2023:1-15. [PMID: 36650719 DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2023.2165084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
To improve medication safety for residents in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), electronic medication administration records (eMARs) are widely adopted in Macao. This study aimed to (1) develop a logic model for adopting eMAR in LTCFs and (2) explore the contextual factors relevant to the implementation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders (managers, doctors, nurses, pharmacy staff and other frontline workers) experienced with eMAR in LTCFs in Macao between February and March 2021. Purposive sampling was used for recruitment and thematic analysis followed the theoretical framework of the logic model. All 57 participants were positive about eMAR. Financial and nonfinancial resources were critical to adopting eMAR. eMAR was mostly used for its functions in documentation, e-prescribing and monitoring. Immediate output included simplified working process, reduced errors, closer monitoring of residents' conditions, and timely communication among staff. The outcomes mainly related to efficiency, safety and quality of care, workload redundancy, and data unification. Key influencing factors included eMAR flexibility, stability, and technical support. Adopting eMARs is highly consuming and the benefits in improving quality of care can only be realized with appropriate implementation, precise execution, regular evaluation and responsive adjustment. The proposed logic model framework serves as a roadmap for LTCFs, both current and future users of eMAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Cheng Lei
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China
| | - Cheng I Loi
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China
| | - Zhifeng Cen
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China
| | - Junlei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China
| | - Zuanji Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China
| | - Hao Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China.,Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China
| | - Tek Fai Chan
- Macao Society for Medicinal Administration, Macao, SAR, China
| | - Carolina Oi Lam Ung
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China.,Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dugré N, Bell JS, Hopkins RE, Ilomäki J, Chen EYH, Corlis M, Van Emden J, Hogan M, Sluggett JK. Impact of Medication Regimen Simplification on Medication Incidents in Residential Aged Care: SIMPLER Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10051104. [PMID: 33800845 PMCID: PMC7961370 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In the SImplification of Medications Prescribed to Long-tErm care Residents (SIMPLER) cluster-randomized controlled trial, we investigated the impact of a structured medication regimen simplification intervention on medication incidents in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) over a 12-month follow-up. A clinical pharmacist applied the validated 5-step Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE) for 96 of the 99 participating residents in the four intervention RACFs. The 143 participating residents in the comparison RACFs received usual care. Over 12 months, medication incident rates were 95 and 66 per 100 resident-years in the intervention and comparison groups, respectively (adjusted incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-2.38). The 12-month pre/post incident rate almost halved among participants in the intervention group (adjusted IRR 0.56; 95%CI 0.38-0.80). A significant reduction in 12-month pre/post incident rate was also observed in the comparison group (adjusted IRR 0.67, 95%CI 0.50-0.90). Medication incidents over 12 months were often minor in severity. Declines in 12-month pre/post incident rates were observed in both study arms; however, rates were not significantly different among residents who received and did not receive a one-off structured medication regimen simplification intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Dugré
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.D.); (R.E.H.); (J.I.); (E.Y.H.C.); (J.K.S.)
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Clinique Universitaire de Médecine Familiale Sacré-Coeur, Montréal, QC H3M 3A9, Canada
| | - J. Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.D.); (R.E.H.); (J.I.); (E.Y.H.C.); (J.K.S.)
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2077, Australia; (M.C.); (J.V.E.); (M.H.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-3-9903-9533
| | - Ria E. Hopkins
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.D.); (R.E.H.); (J.I.); (E.Y.H.C.); (J.K.S.)
| | - Jenni Ilomäki
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.D.); (R.E.H.); (J.I.); (E.Y.H.C.); (J.K.S.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Esa Y. H. Chen
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.D.); (R.E.H.); (J.I.); (E.Y.H.C.); (J.K.S.)
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2077, Australia; (M.C.); (J.V.E.); (M.H.)
| | - Megan Corlis
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2077, Australia; (M.C.); (J.V.E.); (M.H.)
- Helping Hand Aged Care, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
| | - Jan Van Emden
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2077, Australia; (M.C.); (J.V.E.); (M.H.)
- Helping Hand Aged Care, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
| | - Michelle Hogan
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2077, Australia; (M.C.); (J.V.E.); (M.H.)
- Helping Hand Aged Care, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
| | - Janet K. Sluggett
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.D.); (R.E.H.); (J.I.); (E.Y.H.C.); (J.K.S.)
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2077, Australia; (M.C.); (J.V.E.); (M.H.)
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, City East campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Makeham M, Pont L, Verdult C, Hardie RA, Raban MZ, Mitchell R, Purdy H, Teichert M, Ingersoll A, Westbrook JI. The General Practice and Residential Aged Care Facility Concordance of Medication (GRACEMED) study. Int J Med Inform 2020; 143:104264. [PMID: 32905865 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lack of interoperable IT systems between residential aged care facilities (RACF) and general practitioners (GP) in primary care settings in Australia introduces the potential for medication discrepancies and other medication errors. The aim of the GRACEMED study is to determine the extent and potential severity of medication discrepancies between general practice and RACFs, and identify factors associated with medication discrepancies. METHODS A cross sectional study of medication discrepancies between RACF medication orders and GP medication lists was conducted in the Sydney North Health Network, Australia. A random sample of RACF residents was included from practice lists provided by the general practices. RACF medication orders and GP medication lists for the included residents were compared, and medication discrepancies between the two sources were identified and characterised in terms of discrepancy type, potential for harm and associated factors. RESULTS 31 GPs and 203 residents were included in the study. A total of 1777 discrepancies were identified giving an overall discrepancy rate of 72.6 discrepancies for every 100 medications. Omissions were the most common discrepancy type (35.2%,) followed by dose discrepancies (34.4%) and additions (30.4%). 48.5% of residents had a discrepancy with the potential to result in moderate harm and 9.8% had a discrepancy with the potential for severe harm. Number of medications prescribed was the only factor associated with medication discrepancies. CONCLUSION Increased use of systems that allow information sharing and improved interoperability of clinical information is urgently needed to address medication safety issues experienced by RACF residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith Makeham
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Australia; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.
| | - Lisa Pont
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Carlijn Verdult
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rae-Anne Hardie
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Magdalena Z Raban
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Purdy
- Australian Digital Health Agency, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Martina Teichert
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Ingersoll
- South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Johanna I Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Omissions of Care in Nursing Home Settings: A Narrative Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:604-614.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
6
|
Hanratty B, Craig D, Brittain K, Spilsbury K, Vines J, Wilson P. Innovation to enhance health in care homes and evaluation of tools for measuring outcomes of care: rapid evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundFlexible, integrated models of service delivery are being developed to meet the changing demands of an ageing population. To underpin the spread of innovative models of care across the NHS, summaries of the current research evidence are needed. This report focuses exclusively on care homes and reviews work in four specific areas, identified as key enablers for the NHS England vanguard programme.AimTo conduct a rapid synthesis of evidence relating to enhancing health in care homes across four key areas: technology, communication and engagement, workforce and evaluation.Objectives(1) To map the published literature on the uses, benefits and challenges of technology in care homes; flexible and innovative uses of the nursing and support workforce to benefit resident care; communication and engagement between care homes, communities and health-related organisations; and approaches to the evaluation of new models of care in care homes. (2) To conduct rapid, systematic syntheses of evidence to answer the following questions. Which technologies have a positive impact on resident health and well-being? How should care homes and the NHS communicate to enhance resident, family and staff outcomes and experiences? Which measurement tools have been validated for use in UK care homes? What is the evidence that staffing levels (i.e. ratio of registered nurses and support staff to residents or different levels of support staff) influence resident outcomes?Data sourcesSearches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) and Index to Theses. Grey literature was sought via Google™ (Mountain View, CA, USA) and websites relevant to each individual search.DesignMapping review and rapid, systematic evidence syntheses.SettingCare homes with and without nursing in high-income countries.Review methodsPublished literature was mapped to a bespoke framework, and four linked rapid critical reviews of the available evidence were undertaken using systematic methods. Data were not suitable for meta-analysis, and are presented in narrative syntheses.ResultsSeven hundred and sixty-one studies were mapped across the four topic areas, and 65 studies were included in systematic rapid reviews. This work identified a paucity of large, high-quality research studies, particularly from the UK. The key findings include the following. (1) Technology: some of the most promising interventions appear to be games that promote physical activity and enhance mental health and well-being. (2) Communication and engagement: structured communication tools have been shown to enhance communication with health services and resident outcomes in US studies. No robust evidence was identified on care home engagement with communities. (3) Evaluation: 6 of the 65 measurement tools identified had been validated for use in UK care homes, two of which provide general assessments of care. The methodological quality of all six tools was assessed as poor. (4) Workforce: joint working within and beyond the care home and initiatives that focus on staff taking on new but specific care tasks appear to be associated with enhanced outcomes. Evidence for staff taking on traditional nursing tasks without qualification is limited, but promising.LimitationsThis review was restricted to English-language publications after the year 2000. The rapid methodology has facilitated a broad review in a short time period, but the possibility of omissions and errors cannot be excluded.ConclusionsThis review provides limited evidential support for some of the innovations in the NHS vanguard programme, and identifies key issues and gaps for future research and evaluation.Future workFuture work should provide high-quality evidence, in particular experimental studies, economic evaluations and research sensitive to the UK context.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016052933, CRD42016052933, CRD42016052937 and CRD42016052938.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Hanratty
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katie Brittain
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - John Vines
- Northumbria School of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Wilson
- Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee CY, Beanland C, Goeman D, Petrie N, Petrie B, Vise F, Gray J, Elliott RA. Improving medication safety for home nursing clients: A prospective observational study of a novel clinical pharmacy service-The Visiting Pharmacist (ViP) study. J Clin Pharm Ther 2018; 43:813-821. [DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. Y. Lee
- Bolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service) Institute; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Monash University; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Nursing; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - C. Beanland
- Bolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service) Institute; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - D. Goeman
- Bolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service) Institute; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Central Clinical School; Monash University; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - N. Petrie
- PRN Consulting; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - B. Petrie
- PRN Consulting; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - F. Vise
- Bolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service) Clinical Service; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - J. Gray
- Bolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service) Clinical Service; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - R. A. Elliott
- Bolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service) Institute; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Monash University; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Pharmacy Department; Austin Health; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fuller AEC, Guirguis LM, Sadowski CA, Makowsky MJ. Electronic Medication Administration Records in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66:1428-1436. [PMID: 29684250 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To map the extent, range, and nature of research on the effectiveness, level of use, and perceptions about electronic medication administration records (eMARs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and identify gaps in current knowledge and priority areas for future research. DESIGN Scoping review of quantitative and qualitative literature. SETTING Literature review. PARTICIPANTS Original research relating to eMAR in LTCF was eligible for inclusion. MEASUREMENTS We systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library and performed general and advanced searches of Google to identify grey literature. Two authors independently screened for eligibility of studies. Independent reviewers extracted data regarding country of origin, design, study methods, outcomes studied, and main results in duplicate. RESULTS We identified 694 articles, of which 34 met inclusion criteria. Studies were published between 2006 and 2016 and were mostly from the United States (n=25). Twenty studies (59%) used quantitative methods, including surveys and analysis of eMAR data; 7 (21%) used qualitative methods, including interviews, focus groups, document review, and observation; and 7 (21%) used mixed methods. Three major research areas were explored: medication and medication administration error rates (n=11), eMAR benefits and challenges (n=19), and eMAR prevalence and uptake (n=15). Evidence linking eMAR use and reductions in medication errors is weak because of suboptimal study design and reporting. The majority of studies were descriptive and documented inconsistent benefits and challenges and low levels of eMAR implementation. CONCLUSION Further investigation is required to rigorously evaluate the effect of standalone eMAR systems on medication administration errors and patient safety, the extent of eMAR implementation, pharmacists' perceptions, and cost effectiveness of eMAR systems in LTCF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew E C Fuller
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa M Guirguis
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl A Sadowski
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mark J Makowsky
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tan Y, Elliott RA, Richardson B, Tanner FE, Dorevitch MI. An audit of the accuracy of medication information in electronic medical discharge summaries linked to an electronic prescribing system. Health Inf Manag 2018; 47:125-131. [PMID: 29587532 DOI: 10.1177/1833358318765192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor communication of medication information to general practitioners when patients are discharged from hospital is a widely recognised problem. There has been little research exploring the accuracy of medication information in electronic discharge summaries (EDS) linked to hospital e-prescribing systems. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the accuracy of medication lists and medication change information in EDS produced using an integrated e-prescribing and EDS system (where EDS discharge medication lists were imported from discharge e-prescription records, medication change information was manually entered, and medications were dispensed from paper copies of the patients' e-prescriptions). METHOD Retrospective audit of EDSs for a random sample, representative of adult patients ( n = 87) discharged from a major teaching hospital. EDS medication lists were compared to pharmacist-verified paper discharge prescriptions (considered to be the most accurate discharge medication list) to identify discrepancies. EDS medication change information was compared to medication changes identified by comparing pharmacist-verified "Medication History on Admission" forms with pharmacist-verified paper discharge prescriptions. RESULTS There were 85/87 (98%) EDSs that included a discharge medication list. Of these, 50/85 (59%) contained one or more medication list discrepancies (median 1, range 0-15). The most common discrepancy was omission of medication (58%); 84/131 (64%) discrepancies were considered clinically significant (risk of adverse outcome); 162/351 (46%) clinically significant medication changes were stated in the EDS; and 153/351 (44%) changes were both stated and included a reason. CONCLUSION EDS discrepancies were common despite integration with e-prescribing. Eliminating paper prescriptions, enhancing e-prescribing/EDS functionality and involving pharmacists in EDS preparation may reduce discrepancies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Elliott RA, Lee CY, Hussainy SY. Electronic Prescribing and Medication Management at a Residential Aged Care Facility: Uptake by General Practitioners and Qualitative Evaluation of the Benefits and Barriers. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7:116-27. [PMID: 27081411 DOI: 10.4338/aci-2015-08-ra-0098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 01/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A cloud-based mobile electronic prescribing and medication management system (ePMMS), in which prescribers' orders directly populate residential aged care facility (RACF) medication administration records (MARs) and are communicated electronically to the RACF's pharmacy, may create efficiencies and improve patient safety when compared to the paper-based and hybrid paper-electronic medication management systems used in most Australian RACFs. Little is known about general-practitioners' (GPs'), nurses' and pharmacists' acceptance of, or experiences with, ePMMS. OBJECTIVES To explore the uptake of an ePMMS by GPs, and the experiences and perceptions of GPs, nurses and pharmacists, at a 90-bed RACF that tested a beta-version ePMMS. METHODS Retrospective audit to determine the proportion of medicines ordered by GPs via the ePMMS over a three-month period. Focus groups conducted three-to-four months after implementation: one with GPs (n=5), one with nurses (n=12); in-depth interview/survey of pharmacists (n=2). Qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Three of seven GPs used the ePMMS to order medicines; 53/205(25.9%) medicines were ordered via the ePMMS by GPs. Two broad themes were identified: benefits of the ePMMS, and barriers/limitations. Benefits related to patient safety and workforce efficiency, and included GPs' ability to access and modify residents' MARs remotely, no need for nurses to fax orders to the pharmacy, and no need for pharmacy transcription of GPs' handwritten orders to create electronic MARs. Barriers and limitations related to inefficiency, low GP uptake and training/support, and included slower prescribing compared to written orders, the need for GP-signed paper copies of the MAR, lack of integration with GP clinic software, and low GP motivation to use the system, especially GPs with few patients at the RACF. CONCLUSIONS GPs, nurses and pharmacists felt the ePMMS improved medication-safety and workforce-efficiency, however a number of barriers were identified that contributed to low GP-uptake and limited the benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan A Elliott
- Monash University, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety , Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cik Yin Lee
- Monash University, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Royal District Nursing Service Institute, St Kilda, Victoria, Australia
| | - Safeera Y Hussainy
- Monash University, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety , Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|