1
|
Chauhan A, Chitkara U, Walsan R, Sansom-Daly UM, Manias E, Seah D, Dalli A, El-Kabbout N, Tieu T, Sarwar M, Faiz M, Huang N, Rocha VM, Pal A, Harrison R. Co-designing strategies to improve advance care planning among people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds with cancer: iCanCarePlan study protocol. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:123. [PMID: 38760714 PMCID: PMC11102140 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01453-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) describes the process of supporting individuals at any age or stage of health to consider and share their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future health care. Engaging in ACP is associated with better-quality of care in which people receive care in lines with their wishes, values and preferences. Direct translations of ACP guides and resources do not attend to the considerable inter- and intra-ethnic variations in cultural and religious or spiritual beliefs that shape preferences among people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. ICanCarePlan is a three-year project that aims to determine the prevalence of ACP documentation among people from CALD backgrounds with cancer, identify resources available and their use to support ACP among CALD communities, identify barriers and facilitators of person-centred ACP, and to develop, through co-design with consumers and clinicians, approaches that enhance the process ACP for people from CALD backgrounds. METHOD A mixed-method sequential approach will be used comprising of four studies. Study one is retrospective medical record review of approximately 1500 medical records to establish the prevalence of ACP documentation among CALD patient records in cancer services. Study two is a document analysis synthesising the resources available in the Australian health system to support ACP. Study three is a qualitative study with healthcare staff and consumers to explore barriers and enablers of person-centred ACP. Evidence generated from studies one to three will inform the conduct of co-design with stakeholders to develop approaches to improve ACP processes among CALD communities. Language, technical and financial support for meaningful involvement with consumers from CALD backgrounds throughout this project is outlined. A plan for distress management is also made due to sensitive nature of the topic. The research project has also established a project steering group consisting of three consumer members who are from CALD backgrounds. DISCUSSION The project will address a national priority issue for a growing population of CALD communities in Australia. The project will provide novel evidence of ACP among CALD communities and novel strategies developed with stakeholders to enhance uptake and experiences of ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashfaq Chauhan
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
| | - Upma Chitkara
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Ramya Walsan
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Ursula M Sansom-Daly
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Manias
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Davinia Seah
- Sacred Heart Supportive and Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Angie Dalli
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Thit Tieu
- Sisters' Cancer Support Group Inc., Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Mashreka Sarwar
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Misbah Faiz
- District Clinical Governance, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nancy Huang
- Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Abhijit Pal
- Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Reema Harrison
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brean SJ, Recoche K, William L, Lakhani A, Zhong Y, Shimoinaba K. Advance care plans for vulnerable and disadvantaged adults: systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004162. [PMID: 37380215 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that there is a gap in advance care planning (ACP) completion between vulnerable and disadvantaged populations compared with the general population. This review seeks to identify tools, guidelines or frameworks that have been used to support ACP interventions with vulnerable and disadvantaged adult populations as well as their experiences and outcomes with them. The findings will inform practice in ACP programmes. METHODS A systematic search of six databases from 1 January 2010 to 30 March 2022 was conducted to identify original peer-reviewed research that used ACP interventions via tools, guidelines or frameworks with vulnerable and disadvantaged adult populations and reported qualitative findings. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Relatives, caregivers or substitute decision-makers were included in eight studies. SETTINGS hospital outpatient clinics (N=7), community settings (N=7), nursing homes (N=2), prison (N=1) and hospital (N=1). A variety of ACP tools, guidelines or frameworks were identified; however, the facilitator's skills and approach in delivering the intervention appeared to be as important as the intervention itself. Participants indicated mixed experiences, some positive, some negative and four themes emerged: uncertainty, trust, culture and decision-making behaviour. The most common descriptors relating to these themes were prognosis uncertainty, poor end-of-life communication and the importance of building trust. CONCLUSION The findings indicate that ACP communication could be improved. ACP conversations should incorporate a holistic and personalised approach to optimise efficacy. Facilitators should be equipped with the necessary skills, tools and information needed to assist ACP decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Jane Brean
- Advance Care Planning, Eastern Health, Wantirna, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katrina Recoche
- Monash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leeroy William
- Supportive and Palliative Care Service, Eastern Health, Wantirna, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ali Lakhani
- La Trobe University, School of Psychology and Public Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yaping Zhong
- Monash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kaori Shimoinaba
- Monash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Azzi J, Waked A, Bou-Gharios J, Al Choboq J, Geara F, Bodgi L, Maalouf M. Radiosensitizing Effect of Curcumin on Human Bladder Cancer Cell Lines: Impact on DNA Repair Mechanisms. Nutr Cancer 2021; 74:2207-2221. [PMID: 34643466 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2021.1985534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Chemo-radiotherapy is one of the promising approaches to treat bladder cancer, but its effectiveness is limited to sensitive patients. Polyphenol curcumin has shown anticancer and radiosensitizing potentials, but the mechanism is not fully understood. Here, the In Vitro response of UM-UC5 and UM-UC6 bladder cell lines to curcumin and radiation treatments was evaluated. The effect of curcumin on the DNA double-strand breaks repair system after treatment with ionizing radiation (2 Gy) was determined by immunofluorescence. Cell viability, proliferation, and survival were performed using trypan blue, MTT, clonogenic, and sphere-forming assays. The migratory ability of both cells was assessed by wound healing. We showed that curcumin treatment increased the radiosensitivity by modifying the DNA double-strand breaks repair kinetics of the most radioresistant cells UM-UC6 without affecting the radiosensitive UM-UC5. Moreover, UM-UC6 cell survival and proliferation was significantly decreased after the combination of curcumin with radiation. Bladder cell migration was also inhibited considerably. Curcumin was also shown to reduce the number and the volume of bladder cancer spheres of both cell lines. This study revealed that curcumin was able to radiosensitize resistant bladder cell line without affecting the sensitive one with minimal side effects through enhancing DNA damage signaling and repair pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Azzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Anthony Waked
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences II, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon
| | - Jolie Bou-Gharios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Joelle Al Choboq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Fady Geara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Larry Bodgi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mira Maalouf
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences II, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tran J, Sellars M, Nolte L, White BP, Sinclair C, Fetherstonhaugh D, Detering K. Systematic review and content analysis of Australian health care substitute decision making online resources. AUST HEALTH REV 2021; 45:317-327. [PMID: 33472740 DOI: 10.1071/ah20070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective Substitute decision makers (SDMs) can be required to make difficult health care decisions on behalf of individuals lacking decision-making capacity. Online resources may be helpful in preparing and supporting SDMs. This study systematically explored the frequency, content and usability of Australian online resources containing health care substitute decision-making content written for consumers. Methods In April 2019, Google searches were conducted to identify online resources containing health care substitute decision-making content for consumers. Analysis comprised mapping resource characteristics, including target audience (individual-specific, SDM-specific, mixed) and thematic analysis of content. Usability was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Results Of the 61 resources identified, the most frequent were webpages (57%), individual-specific (43%) and those produced by government organisations (31%). Only 15 resources (24%) were written for SDMs. Content themes identified were: defining the scope of the SDM role (93%); recommended traits or characteristics of SDMs (80%); instructions or principles regarding standards for decision making (75%); duties of SDMs (70%); and supports (46%), rights (16%), barriers (8%) and benefits (5%) for SDMs. The median (interquartile range) PEMAT scores (out of 100) were 66 (27) for understandability and 60 (55) for actionability. Conclusions SDMs have a vital role in making decisions for people lacking decision-making capacity. Online resources are a potential source of information and support for SDMs in Australia. This study identified key gaps in availability, content and usability of existing SDM resources, highlighting the need for the further development of such resources. We suggest that future resource development include SDMs in the design and evaluation processes. What is known about the topic? An aging population and a greater need for decisions to be made on behalf of others who lack capacity means that health care substitute decision-making is occurring more frequently. Appointing one or more SDMs may occur as part of the advance care planning process. However, being a healthcare SDM can be difficult and stressful. People frequently use the Internet to search for health-related information. What does this paper add? This paper systematically examined the frequency, content and usability of existing Australian online resources with substitute decision-making content written for a consumer audience in English, and identified key gaps in online resources available to support SDMs. What are the implications for practitioners? Although there is a need for resources written for SDMs, authors of online resources need to pay careful attention to the purpose, content and usability of their resource. Future resource development should include input from SDMs and involve them in evaluation to assess whether the resources meet target audience needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Tran
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. ; ;
| | - Marcus Sellars
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. ; ; ; and Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
| | - Linda Nolte
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. ; ;
| | - Ben P White
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
| | - Craig Sinclair
- Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, University of New South Wales, 223 Anzac Parade, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia. ; and Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Barker Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh
- Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Melbourne VIC 3086, Australia.
| | - Karen Detering
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. ; ; ; and Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia; and Present address. Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorne, Vic. 3122, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hempton C, Bhatia N. Deciding For When You Can't Decide: The Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic). JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2020; 17:109-120. [PMID: 32056125 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-020-09960-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The Australian state of Victoria introduced new legislation regulating medical treatment and associated decision-making in March 2018. In this article we provide an overview of the new Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic) and compare it to the former (now repealed) Medical Treatment Act 1988 (Vic). Most substantially, the new Act provides for persons with relevant decision-making capacity to make decisions in advance regarding their potential future medical care, to take effect in the event they themselves do not have decision-making capacity. Prima facie, the new Act enshrines autonomy as the pre-eminent value underlying the state's approach to medical treatment decision-making and associated surrogate decision-making. However, we contend that the intention of the Act may not accord with implementation of the Act to date if members of the community are not aware of the Act's provisions or are not engaged in advance care planning. There is a need for further research, robust community advocacy, and wider engagement for the intention of the Act-the promotion of "precedent autonomy" in respect to surrogate medical treatment decision-making-to be fully realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Hempton
- Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
| | - Neera Bhatia
- School of Law, Deakin University, Burwood Highway, Burwood Corporate Centre, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krok-Schoen JL, Bernardo BM, Elena JW, Green PA, Hoover E, Peng J, Anderson GL, Caan B, Johnson LG, Paskett ED. An Environmental Scan of Biopsychosocial and Clinical Variables in Cohort Studies of Cancer Survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1621-1641. [PMID: 31315912 PMCID: PMC6774809 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An inventory of cancer survivorship cohorts is necessary to identify important gaps in what is being studied among cancer survivors. METHODS We conducted an environmental scan of cancer survivor cohorts to determine the scope and scale of information collected on demographic, biopsychosocial, and selected clinical variables from cancer survivors. Cohorts were eligible for inclusion in the environmental scan if the study was conducted in the United States, reported in English, and consisted of data collected from cancer survivors postdiagnosis and followed for at least 1 year. RESULTS Out of the 131 cohorts identified, 62 were eligible. There were 23 cancer sites represented, and more than half of the studies included breast cancer survivors (n = 34). The next most commonly included cancers were leukemia (n = 22) and lymphoma (n = 23). The majority (n = 59) collected information on clinical characteristics and basic diagnostic information, patient demographic characteristics (n = 57), patient-reported symptoms (n = 44), lifestyle (n = 45), and psychologic characteristics (n = 42). Half collected biospecimens (n = 35) and biomarkers (n = 35); fewer collected CAM use (n = 19) and social characteristics (n = 27). CONCLUSIONS Extensive data are available in cancer cohorts to study important questions relevant to cancer survivors. Cohorts should consider collecting information on social and environmental factors, as well as biospecimen collection and biomarker analyses, and should include survivors from cancer sites less likely to be studied. IMPACT This information can assist researchers in understanding the types of information currently being gathered from cancer survivors for further analysis and identify areas where more research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Krok-Schoen
- Division of Medical Dietetics and Health Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Joanne W Elena
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paige A Green
- Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Science Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Elise Hoover
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Juan Peng
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Garnet L Anderson
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bette Caan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Lisa G Johnson
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Electra D Paskett
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pereira-Salgado A, Mader P, O'Callaghan C, Boyd L. A Website Supporting Sensitive Religious and Cultural Advance Care Planning (ACPTalk): Formative and Summative Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7:e78. [PMID: 29661749 PMCID: PMC5928329 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.8572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) promotes conversations about future health care needs, enacted if a person is incapable of making decisions at end-of-life that may be communicated through written documentation such as advance care directives. To meet the needs of multicultural and multifaith populations in Australia, an advance care planning website, ACPTalk, was funded to support health professionals in conducting conversations within diverse religious and cultural populations. ACPTalk aimed to provide religion-specific advance care planning content and complement existing resources. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper was to utilize the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) framework to conduct a formative and summative evaluation of ACPTalk. METHODS The CIPP framework was used, which revolves around 4 aspects of evaluation: context, input, process, and product. Context: health professionals' solutions for the website were determined through thematic analysis of exploratory key stakeholder interviews. Included religions were determined through an environmental scan, Australian population statistics, and documentary analysis of project steering committee meeting minutes. Input: Project implementation and challenges were examined through documentary analysis of project protocols and meeting minutes. Process: To ensure religion-specific content was accurate and appropriate, a website prototype was built with content review and functionality testing by representatives from religious and cultural organizations and other interested health care organizations who completed a Web-based survey. Product: Website analytics were used to report utilization, and stakeholder perceptions were captured through interviews and a website survey. RESULTS Context: A total of 16 key stakeholder health professional (7 general practitioners, 2 primary health nurses, and 7 palliative care nurses) interviews were analyzed. Website solutions included religious and cultural information, communication ideas, legal information, downloadable content, and Web-based accessibility. Christian and non-Christian faiths were to be included in the religion-specific content. Input: Difficulties gaining consensus on religion-specific content were overcome by further state and national religious organizations providing feedback. Process: A total of 37 content reviewers included representatives of religious and cultural organizations (n=29), health care (n=5), and community organizations (n=3). The majority strongly agree or agree that the content used appropriate language and tone (92%, 34/37), would support health professionals (89%, 33/37), and was accurate (83%, 24/29). Product: Resource usage within the first 9 months was 12,957 page views in 4260 sessions; majority were (83.45%, 3555/4260) from Australia. A total of 107 Australian-based users completed the website survey; most felt information was accurate (77.6%, 83/107), easy to understand (82.2%, 88/107), useful (86.0%, 92/107), and appropriate (86.0%, 92/107). A total of 20 nurses (general practice n=10, palliative care n=8, and both disciplines n=2) participated in stakeholder interviews. Qualitative findings indicated overall positivity in relation to accessibility, functionality, usefulness, design, and increased knowledge of advance care planning. Recommended improvements included shortened content, a comparable website for patients and families, and multilingual translations. CONCLUSIONS The CIPP framework was effectively applied to evaluate the development and end product of an advance care planning website.Although overall findings were positive, further advance care planning website development should consider the recommendations derived from this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Pereira-Salgado
- Centre for Nursing Research, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, VIC, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Patrick Mader
- Centre for Nursing Research, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, VIC, Australia
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Palliative and Supportive Care Research Department, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, VIC, Australia.,Departments of Psychosocial Cancer Care and Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.,Institute for Ethics and Society, The University of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leanne Boyd
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Cabrini Institute, Malvern, VIC, Australia.,Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|