Are our patients becoming more complex? Trends in comorbidity and functional dependence in General Medicine 2011-2019

BACKGROUND

Anecdotally, patients don't seem to be more unwell than they were 10 years ago, yet they still seem more 'complex'.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to use an objective measure to assess the trend in complexity of general medicine patients over a 9-year period.

METHODS

Complexity was pragmatically defined as a composite of comorbidity plus dependence/frailty. We selected 100 consecutive patients discharged from General Medicine at Monash Medical Centre (a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia) in the month of April of each year from 2011 to 2019. For each patient, we retrospectively calculated their burden of comorbidity and their degree of dependency/frailty. Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and dependence/frailty was assessed using the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADL) and the Braden Scale (BS). The BS is a pressure injury risk assessment tool. Additional demographic data were collected, including length of stay, admission and discharge residence, 30-day readmission rate and inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant change in the CCI or the Katz ADL. The median BS did however significantly decrease from 19 in 2011 to 16 in 2019 (P = 0.006), reflecting an increased risk of pressure injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a stable level of comorbidity, our finding of a decreasing BS score may suggest that patients are becoming more dependent. This increase in dependency rather than a change in chronic disease burden may be the cause of apparent increasing patient complexity.

An examination of the nature and characteristics of patients readmitted to acute care from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation

AIM

To describe the nature of readmission to acute care and identify patient characteristics associated with avoidable readmission to acute care from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort design.

METHODS

Data prospectively documented between 1 January 2012 -31 December 2018 in local clinical and administrative database were used. Patient medical records were accessed when missing data were identified. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the nature of readmission episodes and univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify patient characteristics associated with readmission to acute care.

RESULTS

Of the 383 patients admitted for rehabilitation, 83 (22%) experienced readmission to acute care for a total of 171 episodes. Thirty-seven percent of readmission episodes were due to hospital acquired complications and therefore potentially avoidable. Infection accounted for 63% of hospital acquired complications. Patients with an avoidable readmission episode (N = 38) were more likely to have a significantly lower Functional Independence Measure score, be incontinent, have a tracheostomy, require a mobility aid, and be prescribed a dysphagia diet on rehabilitation admission. Patients with a tracheostomy on rehabilitation admission had a 56% probability for an avoidable readmission to acute care.

CONCLUSION

Brain injury rehabilitation patients with an avoidable readmission to acute care were more likely to have a higher burden of care on rehabilitation admission and infection was the leading cause of avoidable readmission episodes.

IMPACT

Research into readmission to acute care in the mixed brain injury inpatient rehabilitation population is limited. In this patient population, readmission to acute care is a contemporary issue that can occur at any time during a patient's rehabilitation admission. This study provides valuable information informing practice change for preventing avoidable readmission episodes. Locally developed policy aimed at preventing readmission episodes should include proactive prevention, early recognition of complications and discrete escalation care pathways.

Examining subacute nurses' roles in a changing healthcare context

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore and describe nurses' role in the rehabilitation and care of patients in one subacute care facility in Melbourne, Australia.

BACKGROUND

The role of nurses in subacute care and within the rehabilitation team is evolving and remains unclear.

DESIGN

Mixed methods.

METHODS

Fourteen nurses from seven rehabilitation and geriatric evaluation and management wards in one subacute facility in Melbourne, Australia, were observed in practice for two hours and then interviewed. Activities were recorded electronically. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using content analysis. The study complied with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).

RESULTS

Three main themes are as follows: (a) Nurses as rehabilitators; (b) Teamwork in rehabilitation; and (c) The changing context of subacute care. Nurses prioritised patient personal and clinical care above other responsibilities. They were largely excluded from team decision-making because clinical responsibilities precluded them from attending team meetings. Unsuitable buildings, increased patient acuity and time constraints were further challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses have a multifaceted role in patient rehabilitation that is poorly understood. An evaluation of the nursing role within the interdisciplinary team, skills and processes of care may increase understanding, and improve communication and relationships between disciplines potentially benefiting patients. Role clarity and differentiation in nursing skills are required within the nursing workforce.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses have a unique role in both clinical care and rehabilitation of patients, and as part of the interdisciplinary team. Respectful professional relationships need fostering within the interdisciplinary team to achieve optimal patient outcomes. The way that team meetings and decision-making occur in the subacute wards requires adjustment to ensure that the valuable contribution of nurses, both to the interdisciplinary team and to the rehabilitation of patients, is used and acknowledged to improve patient care.