1
|
Cheney K, Mignacca E, Black KI, Homer C, Bradfield Z. An exploration of the contraceptive counselling practices of midwives who provide postpartum care in Australia. Midwifery 2024; 131:103948. [PMID: 38335692 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to explore and describe midwives' attitudes and practices relating to their provision of postpartum contraception counselling. DESIGN We used an exploratory cross-sectional design. Recruitment used an anonymous online survey using electronic communication platforms of professional, and special-interest organisations, over six months . Descriptive and quantitative analysis was used. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Australian Midwives who provide postpartum care. MEANING AND FINDINGS A total of 289 complete responses were included. Findings from this national survey of midwives showed that almost 75% of Australian midwives reported providing some contraceptive advice to women. Those working in continuity of care models were significantly more likely to fulfil this responsibility. More than half (67%) indicated they had not received any formal contraception education or training. Those working in private obstetric-led settings were significantly less likely to have received education compared to midwives in community settings. Systems barriers preventing the provision of contraceptive counselling included: clinical workload; lack of management support; lack of education; and models of care. KEY CONCLUSIONS Most midwives (82%) wanted to provide postpartum contraception counselling as part of their role. They cited barriers from within the health system, ambiguity about roles and responsibilities and offered solutions to improve the provision of postnatal contraception counselling. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Recommendations include the development of education programs for midwives. Continuity of care models provided the time, autonomy and opportunity for midwives to undertake contraceptive counselling and fulfil this part of their professional scope. Consideration should be given to expanding access and provision of continuity of midwifery care. An urgent investment in the education and skills of midwives is recommended to ensure all women across acute and community services benefit from improved outcomes associated with pregnancy spacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Cheney
- The Sydney School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil Health Building, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Emily Mignacca
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, Oral Health Therapy, Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Science, Curtin University Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Kirsten I Black
- The Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil Health Building, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Caroline Homer
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne 3004, Australia
| | - Zoe Bradfield
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, Oral Health Therapy, Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Science, Curtin University Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bell SFE, Harvey C, Mack F, Lambert S, Lazarou M, Strom K, Dean JA. Rethinking referral pathways: qualitative evaluation of general practice networks to increase access to intrauterine contraception. Fam Pract 2022; 39:1109-1115. [PMID: 35485435 PMCID: PMC9680659 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmac040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-acting reversible contraceptives are recommended first-line contraception; however, intrauterine device (IUD) uptake remains low in Australia. OBJECTIVES To describe the outcomes of an independent evaluation of the General Practitioner IUD Insertion Network (GPIIN), a project designed to address access barriers through formalized referral pathways between general practitioners (GPs) inserting IUDs and noninserters. METHODS An independent qualitative pragmatic inductive evaluation, involving 14 in-depth interviews with GPIIN members, was conducted 18 months post-GPIIN implementation in 2 Australian jurisdictions to identify and explore critical success factors and limitations of the model. RESULTS Local GP-to-GP IUD referral networks were considered a useful model to assist affordable and timely IUD access, improve noninserters' IUD knowledge and inserters' reflection on best practice. However, pathway simplification is needed to determine optimal integration of the concept into pragmatic GP-to-GP referral arrangements. CONCLUSIONS GPIIN provides an opportunity to improve IUD access in Primary Health Care. Further consideration of organizations best positioned and resourced to facilitate sustainable delivery and coordination is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara F E Bell
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Caroline Harvey
- Iris Education, Eldridge Street, Toowong, Queensland, Australia
| | - Fiona Mack
- Iris Education, Eldridge Street, Toowong, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephen Lambert
- Iris Education, Eldridge Street, Toowong, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mattea Lazarou
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kay Strom
- Iris Education, Eldridge Street, Toowong, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judith A Dean
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manalew W, Hale N, Leinaar E, Sen B, Smith M, Khoury A. Medicaid Cost Savings from Provision of Contraception to Beneficiaries in South Carolina, 2012–2018. Popul Health Manag 2022; 25:542-550. [DOI: 10.1089/pop.2021.0392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W.Samuel Manalew
- Department of Health Services Management and Policy and Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nathan Hale
- Department of Health Services Management and Policy and Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
| | - Edward Leinaar
- Department of Health Services Management and Policy and Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bisakha Sen
- Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Michael Smith
- Department of Health Services Management and Policy and Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amal Khoury
- Department of Health Services Management and Policy and Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Farah D, de Moraes Andrade TR, Sansone D, Batista Castello Girão MJ, Fonseca MCM. A Cost Effectiveness Model of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods in the Brazilian National Health System. Am J Prev Med 2022; 62:114-121. [PMID: 34922650 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of long-acting reversible contraceptives is low among adolescents owing to the high up-front cost. In this study, a 5-year cost-effectiveness model and budget impact analysis were used to compare the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives with the use of combined oral contraceptives among Brazilian adolescents. METHODS A Markov model was developed to mirror the clinical and economic effects of long-acting reversible contraceptives among sexually active Brazilian adolescents in the public health system for a 5-year duration, starting from 2018. The costs were expressed in U.S.$, and a 5% discount rate was applied for both costs and benefits. Model inputs included costs of the contraceptive methods, contraceptive discontinuation and adherence rates, abortion, and birth costs associated with unintended pregnancies. The model outcomes were avoided pregnancies, abortions, and births. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS Copper intrauterine device use was dominant 100% of the time for all outcomes, and a budget impact analysis revealed a cost savings of $422,431,269.10 in the 5-year period. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system and subdermal implant use were cost effective for all outcomes. The budget impact analyses revealed costs of $65,645,417.54 for levonorgestrel intrauterine system and $302,852,972.12 for subdermal implant use during the 5-year study period. CONCLUSIONS According to this Brazilian model, copper intrauterine device use is dominant, and levonorgestrel intrauterine systems and subdermal implants are more cost effective than combined oral contraceptives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Farah
- Department of Gynecology, Health Technologies Assessment Center - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Dayan Sansone
- Department of Gynecology, Health Technologies Assessment Center - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
- Department of Gynecology, Health Technologies Assessment Center - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Cunio Machado Fonseca
- Department of Gynecology, Health Technologies Assessment Center - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lewandowska M, De Abreu Lourenco R, Haas M, Watson CJ, Black KI, Taft A, Lucke J, McGeechan K, McNamee K, Peipert JF, Mazza D. Cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention in general practice to increase uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Australia. AUST HEALTH REV 2021; 45:728-734. [PMID: 34903325 DOI: 10.1071/ah20282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Australian Contraceptive ChOice pRoject (ACCORd) intervention. Methods An economic evaluation compared the costs and outcomes of the ACCORd intervention with usual care (UC). Data from the ACCORd trial were used to estimate costs and efficacy in terms of contraceptive uptake and quality of life. Rates of contraceptive failure and pregnancy were sourced from the literature. Using a Markov model, within-trial results were extrapolated over 10 years and subjected to univariate sensitivity analyses. Model outputs were expressed as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained and cost per unintended pregnancy resulting in birth (UPB) avoided. Results Over 10 years, compared with UC, initiating contraception through the ACCORd intervention resulted in 0.02 fewer UPB and higher total costs (A$2505 vs A$1179) per woman. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the ACCORd intervention versus UC was A$1172 per QALY gained and A$7385 per UPB averted. If the start-up cost of the ACCORd intervention was removed, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was A$81 per QALY gained and A$511 per UPB averted. The results were most sensitive to the probability of contraceptive failure, the probability of pregnancy-related healthcare service utilisation or the inclusion of the costs of implementing the ACCORd intervention. Conclusions From a health system perspective, if implemented appropriately in terms of uptake and reach, and assuming an implicit willingness to pay threshold of A$50 000 the ACCORd intervention is cost-effective. What is known about the topic? The uptake of long-active reversible contraceptives (LARC) in Australia is low. The ACCORd trial assessed the efficacy of providing structured training to general practitioners (GPs) on LARC counselling, together with access to rapid referral to insertion clinics. What does this paper add? This study is the first to assess the cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention in the general practice setting aimed at increasing the uptake of LARC in Australia. What are the implications for practitioners? The results show that implementing a complex intervention in general practice involving GP education and the availability of rapid referral to LARC insertion clinics is a cost-effective approach to increase LARC use and its attending efficacy. If the majority of Australian GPs were able to deliver effectiveness-based contraceptive counselling and either insert LARC or use a rapid referral process to a LARC insertion clinic, the additional cost associated with the purchase of LARC products and their insertion would be offset by reductions to health system costs as a result of fewer UPB and abortions. Moreover, the benefits to women's physical and psychological health of avoiding such events is substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Lewandowska
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. ; ; and Corresponding author.
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. ;
| | - Marion Haas
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. ; ; and School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Cathy J Watson
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. ;
| | - Kirsten I Black
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Angela Taft
- Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
| | - Jayne Lucke
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. ; ; and School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kathleen McNamee
- Family Planning Victoria, Vic., Australia. ; and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jeffrey F Peipert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. ;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
White A, Srinivasan M, Wingate LM, Peasah S, Fleming M. Development of a pharmacoeconomic registry: an example using hormonal contraceptives. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2021; 11:10. [PMID: 33745016 PMCID: PMC7981865 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-021-00309-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease-specific registries, documenting costs and probabilities from pharmacoeconomic studies along with health state utility values from quality-of-life studies could serve as a resource to guide researchers in evaluating the published literature and in the conduct of future economic evaluations for their own research. Registries cataloging economic evaluations currently exist, however they are restricted by the type of economic evaluations they include. There is a need for intervention-specific registries, that document all types of complete and partial economic evaluations and auxiliary information such as quality of life studies. The objective of this study is to describe the development of a pharmacoeconomic registry and provide best practices using an example of hormonal contraceptives. METHODS An expert panel consisting of researchers with expertise in pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research was convened and the clinical focus of the registry was finalized after extensive discussion. A list of key continuous, categorical and descriptive variables was developed to capture all relevant data with each variable defined in a data dictionary. A web-based data collection tool was designed to capture and store the resulting metadata. A keyword based search strategy was developed to retrieve the published sources of literature. Finally, articles were screened for relevancy and data was extracted to populate the registry. Expert opinions were taken from the panel at each stage to arrive at consensus and ensure validity of the registry. RESULTS The registry focused on economic evaluation literature of hormonal contraceptives used for contraception. The registry consisted of 65 articles comprising of 22 cost-effectiveness analyses, 9 cost-utility analyses, 7 cost-benefit analyses, 1 cost-minimization, 14 cost analyses, 10 cost of illness studies and 2 quality of life studies. The best practices followed in the development of the registry were summarized as recommendations. The completed registry, data dictionary and associated data files can be accessed in the supplementary information files. CONCLUSION This registry is a comprehensive database of economic evaluations, including costs, clinical probabilities and health-state utility estimates. The collated data captured from published information in this registry can be used to identify trends in the literature, conduct systematic reviews and meta-analysis and develop novel pharmacoeconomic models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annesha White
- University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, UNT System College of Pharmacy, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, IREB 211, Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA
| | - Meenakshi Srinivasan
- University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA
| | | | - Samuel Peasah
- Mercer University College of Pharmacy, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
| | - Marc Fleming
- University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Turner R, Tapley A, Sweeney S, Magin P. Barriers to prescribing of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) by general practitioner registrars: A cross-sectional questionnaire. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 61:469-473. [PMID: 33590480 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is highly effective but uptake in Australia is low. We aimed to establish general practitioner (GP) registrars' (vocational trainees') perspectives on barriers to prescribing LARC. We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of 191 GP registrars in NSW and ACT. Outcome factors were levels of agreement with eight barriers to prescribing LARC. We found the most-reported barriers to prescribing LARC were limited access to training and limited opportunities to maintain skills. Registrars perceived greater barriers to the use of intrauterine devices, compared to contraceptive implants, regarding indemnity insurance, difficulty accessing training, and insufficient insertion opportunities to maintain skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Turner
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,GP Synergy NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda Tapley
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,GP Synergy NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sally Sweeney
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Elermore Vale General Practice, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Parker Magin
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,GP Synergy NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grzeskowiak LE, Calabretto H, Amos N, Mazza D, Ilomaki J. Changes in use of hormonal long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in Australia between 2006 and 2018: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 61:128-134. [PMID: 33095452 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are promoted internationally as a key strategy for reducing unintended pregnancy and abortion rates. AIMS To examine trends in use of hormonal LARCs among reproductive-aged women in Australia between 2006 and 2018 and explore trends according to age groups and state/territory of dispensing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective population-based study using Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) dispensing claims of a 10% random sample of females aged 15-44. We investigated rates and annual trends in dispensing claims of etonorgestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (IUS). RESULTS Between 2006 and 2018, annual PBS claims for LARCs increased approximately two-fold from 21.7 to 41.5 per 1000 women, with a plateau observed from 2015 onward. Absolute rate increases were similar for the implant (9.0/1000) and IUS (10.8/1000), with increases observed across all age groups and states/territories. Overall dispensing rates varied by two-fold according to state/territory of dispensing and four-fold according to age groups. Rate increases for the implant were highest among the 15-19 and 20-24 age groups, while rate increases for the IUS were highest among the 35-39 and 40-44 age groups. It is estimated that in 2018, 10.8% of women aged 15-44 were using a LARC; 4.5% for the implant and 6.3% for the IUS. CONCLUSIONS Rates of hormonal LARC use have doubled over the past decade. Investigating underlying reasons for the large observed differences in rates of use according to age and state/territory could help further improve uptake for these most effective methods of contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke E Grzeskowiak
- Adelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Women's & Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Calabretto
- Adelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,SHINE SA, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Natalie Amos
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenni Ilomaki
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|