'I'm over the moon!': patient-perceived outcomes of hepatitis C treatment

Understanding patient-perceived outcomes is crucial for assessing the effectiveness and acceptability of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. This study aimed to explore patient-perceived outcomes of receiving direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). This study was a part of a mixed-methods case study of the Prince Charles Hospital program for improving access to HCV treatment in community settings. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with nine patients who were in different stages of their treatment for HCV. The participants were recruited using purposive sampling. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Patients emphasised 'having more energy' when reporting improvements in their physical health following treatment. They also reported a newly developed sense of freedom and hope. Improved physical and mental health empowered them to start a healthy lifestyle and to practise self-protection from the risk of re-infection. Patients highlighted their desire to help other patients to receive treatment, which was connected to their experience of the services that they received and their perceived health outcomes. Patients expect and experience various outcomes that are related to the physical, psychological and social aspects of living with, and being cured of HCV. Emphasis on the short-term outcomes of receiving HCV treatment may improve HCV treatment uptake and adherence rates.

Provider-related barriers and enablers to the provision of hepatitis C treatment by general practitioners in Scotland: A behaviour change analysis

The ease of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has provided an opportunity to decentralize HCV treatment into community settings. However, the role of non-specialist clinicians in community-based pathways has received scant attention to date. This study examined barriers and enablers to expanding the role of general practitioners (GPs) in HCV treatment provision, using simple behaviour change theory as a conceptual framework. A maximum variation sample of 22 HCV treatment providers, GPs and HCV support workers participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were inductively coded, and the resulting codes deductively mapped into three principal components of behaviour change: capability, opportunity and motivation (COM-B). By this process, a number of provider- and systemic-level barriers and enablers were identified. Key barriers included the pre-treatment assessment of liver fibrosis, GP capacity and the 'speciality' of HCV care. Enablers included the simplicity of the drugs, existing GP/patient relationships and the provision of holistic care. In addition to these specific factors, the data also exposed an overarching provider understanding of 'HCV treatment' as triumvirate in nature, incorporating the assessment of liver fibrosis, the provision of holistic support and the treatment of disease. This understanding imposes a further fundamental barrier to GP-led treatment as each of these three components needs to be individually addressed. To enable sustainable models of HCV treatment provision by GPs, a pragmatic re-examination of the 'HCV treatment triumvirate' is required, and a paradigm shift from the 'refer and treat' status quo.

Enablers and barriers for the provision of community-based HCV treatment: A case study of a real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Although the availability of fully funded direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and the eligibility of primary care providers (PCPs) to provide hepatitis C virus (HCV) have removed barriers related to access to hospital-based HCV treatment in Australia, there are still many barriers to the provision of HCV treatment in community settings. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the barriers to, and enablers of HCV treatment in community settings in Australia. This study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the provision of community-based HCV treatment.

METHODS

This study was a part of a mixed-method case study of the Cure-It programme. The programme was studied to better understand barriers and enablers experienced by stakeholders of such programmes. The programme is delivered through the Prince Charles Hospital in Brisbane, Australia, and aimed to improve access to HCV treatment in community settings. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 12 healthcare providers and nine patients between July and December 2018. Purposive sampling was used to ensure diverse views were captured. The interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ease of access to specialist support, easy and high value treatment, co-location with or providing other services and motivated patients enabled PCPs to be engaged with the Cure-It programme. Several interconnected factors related to patients' characteristics and health system acted synergistically to enable patients to initiate and complete treatment. These included a desire to remove HCV as a source of shame, having children, awareness of HCV consequences, access to DAAs for free, ease of access to general practices and drug and alcohol services, and access to a safe and enabling environment. The identified barriers were interconnected at the levels of patients, PCPs and primary care systems and acted synergistically to prevent patients and PCPs from becoming engaged with HCV treatment. PCPs' related barriers included a lack of knowledge, their perception of HCV as a specialist area and of patients with HCV as 'hard to manage' patients along with the practice preferences and priorities. Patients' related barriers included their socioeconomic characteristics, internalized stigma, perception of not being sick and lack of knowledge. Additionally, the unavailability of support for patients and existence of stigma in primary health care, along with poor communication between the hospital and primary care system, and the unavailability of FibroScan^® in primary care discouraged PCPs and patients engagement specifically with the provision of community-based HCV treatment.

CONCLUSION

Various strategies are needed to improve PCPs and patients' knowledge and awareness of HCV treatment. Training and support for PCPs need to be easy to access and should cover both clinical and social aspect of HCV. Connecting PCPs to other related services may improve PCPs' and patients' engagement with HCV treatment.

Elements of community-based models for treating hepatitis C virus in supporting HCV elimination in Australia: A Delphi study

BACKGROUND

A key to achieving the goal of hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination is the provision of its treatment in community settings. This study aimed to identify the important organisational and operational elements of community-based models for treating HCV and their feasibility in the Australian context.

METHODS

A Delphi study was conducted with 33 experts from Australia. The questionnaire included 13 elements drawn from the literature. Participants rated each element on a five-point Likert scale for importance and feasibility and suggested additional elements. Consensus was identified when the sum of categories 1 and 2 or 4 and 5 of the five-point Likert scale reached greater than or equal to 70%.

RESULTS

Eight elements reached consensus in regard to importance including "Safe and enabling environment," "Training and support for healthcare providers," "Open referral policy," "Linkage with or providing outreach services," "Person-centred approach," "On-site screening and assessment," "Linkage or co-location with harm reduction services," and "Linkage or co-location with drug and alcohol services." At least 65% of participants agreed implementing elements of open referral policy, Training and support for healthcare providers, and Person-centred approach are usually or always/very feasible. For the other five elements, this was agreed to by a range of 15.2%-57.6% of participants.

CONCLUSION

Successful community-based models for treating HCV in Australia are dependent on the integration and coordination of care and the support provided for both patients and healthcare providers. Substantial work is required across policy and health service planning to integrate these highly rated elements into Australian primary health care.