Local and regional workforce return on investment from sponsoring rural generalist-based training for medical students

Rural longitudinal integrated clerkships and medical workforce outcomes: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Internationally the medical workforce is suffering from a persistent geographic and specialist maldistribution. Longitudinal models of rural medical education such as longitudinal integrated clerkships (LIC) have been one of the strategies employed to redress this issue.

AIM

To map and synthesise the evidence on the medical workforce outcomes of rural LIC graduates, identifying gaps in the literature to inform future research.

METHODS

This review followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological steps. Databases searched included Medline, CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Elsevier), and ISI Web of Science.

RESULTS

A total of 9045 non-duplicate articles were located, 112 underwent a full review, with 25 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Studies were commonly cohort-based (84%), with data collected by database tracking and data linkage (52%). Five themes were identified to summarise the studies: (i) Overall geographic workforce outcomes (ii) influence of non-LIC medical training, (iii) remaining in region and level of rurality, (iv) medical speciality choice and rurality, and (v) selection and preferences.

CONCLUSION

Synthesis of the evidence related to workforce outcomes of rural LIC graduates provides directions for future rural medical workforce planning and research. While rural LIC graduates were found to be more likely to work rurally and in primary care specialities compared to graduates from other training pathways there is evidence to suggest this can be enhanced by strategically aligning selection and training factors.

Approaches Used to Describe, Measure, and Analyze Place of Practice in Dentistry, Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Rural Graduate Workforce Research in Australia: A Systematic Scoping Review

Redressing the maldistribution of the health workforce in regional, rural, and remote geographical areas is a global issue and crucial to improving the accessibility of primary health care and specialist services. Geographical classification systems are important as they provide an objective and quantifiable measure of access and can have direct policy relevance, yet they are not always consistently applied in rural health research. It is unclear how research focusing on the graduate health workforce in Australia has described, measured, and analyzed place of practice. To examine approaches used, this review systematically scopes Australian rural studies focusing on dentistry, medicine, nursing, and allied health graduates that have included place of practice as an outcome measure. The Joanna Brigg's Institute Scoping Review Methodology was used to guide the review. Database searches retrieved 1130 unique citations, which were screened, resulting in 62 studies for inclusion. Included studies were observational, with most focusing on the practice locations of medical graduates and predicators of rural practice. Variations in the use of geographical classification approaches to define rurality were identified and included the use of systems that no longer have policy relevance, as well as adaptations of existing systems that make future comparisons between studies challenging. It is recommended that research examining the geographical distribution of the rural health workforce use uniform definitions of rurality that are aligned with current government policy.