1
|
Beranek CT, Southwell D, Jessop TS, Hope B, Gama VF, Gallahar N, Webb E, Law B, McIlwee A, Wood J, Roff A, Gillespie G. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of drones, camera trapping and passive acoustic recorders in detecting changes in koala occupancy. Ecol Evol 2024; 14:e11659. [PMID: 38957698 PMCID: PMC11219196 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Quantifying the cost-effectiveness of alternative sampling methods is crucial for efficient biodiversity monitoring and detection of population trends. In this study, we compared the cost-effectiveness of three novel sampling methods for detecting changes in koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) occupancy: thermal drones, passive acoustic recorders and camera trapping. Specifically, we fitted single-season occupancy-detection models to data recorded from 46 sites in eight bioregions of New South Wales, Australia, between 2018 and 2022. We explored the effect of weather variables on daily detection probability for each method and, using these estimates, calculated the statistical power to detect 30%, 50% and 80% declines in koala occupancy. We calculated power for different combinations of sites (1-200) and repeat surveys (2-40) and developed a cost model that found the cheapest survey design that achieved 80% power to detect change. On average, detectability of koalas was highest with one 24-h period of acoustic surveys (0.32, 95% CI's: 0.26, 0.39) compared to a 25-ha flight of drone surveys (0.28, 95% 0.15, 0.48) or a 24-h period of camera trapping consisting of six cameras (0.019, 95% CI's: 0.014, 0.025). We found a negative quadratic relationship between detection probability and air temperature for all three methods. Our power and cost analysis suggested that 148 sites surveyed with acoustic recorders deployed for 14 days would be the cheapest method to sufficiently detect a 30% decline in occupancy with 80% power. We recommend passive acoustic recorders as the most efficient sampling method for monitoring koala occupancy compared to cameras or drones. Further comparative studies are needed to compare the relative effectiveness of these methods and others when the monitoring objective is to detect change in koala abundance over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad T. Beranek
- Conservation Science Research GroupUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Darren Southwell
- Conservation Science Research GroupUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tim S. Jessop
- Koala Science Team, Conservation and Restoration Science, Science, Economics and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Planning and EnvironmentParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Benjamin Hope
- Koala Science Team, Conservation and Restoration Science, Science, Economics and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Planning and EnvironmentParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Veronica Fernandes Gama
- Koala Science Team, Conservation and Restoration Science, Science, Economics and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Planning and EnvironmentParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Nicole Gallahar
- Koala Science Team, Conservation and Restoration Science, Science, Economics and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Planning and EnvironmentParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Elliot Webb
- Koala Science Team, Conservation and Restoration Science, Science, Economics and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Planning and EnvironmentParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Brad Law
- Department of Primary IndustriesForest Science CentreParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Allen McIlwee
- Koala Science Team, Conservation and Restoration Science, Science, Economics and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Planning and EnvironmentParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jared Wood
- NSW Wildlife Drone Hub, Vegetation and Biodiversity Mapping, Science, Economics, and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Climate Change and EnergyParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Adam Roff
- NSW Wildlife Drone Hub, Vegetation and Biodiversity Mapping, Science, Economics, and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Climate Change and EnergyParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Graeme Gillespie
- Koala Science Team, Conservation and Restoration Science, Science, Economics and Insights DivisionNew South Wales Department of Planning and EnvironmentParramattaNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saunders D, Nguyen H, Cowen S, Magrath M, Marsh K, Bell S, Bobruk J. Radio-tracking wildlife with drones: a viewshed analysis quantifying survey coverage across diverse landscapes. WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.1071/wr21033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
3
|
Howell LG, Clulow J, Jordan NR, Beranek CT, Ryan SA, Roff A, Witt RR. Drone thermal imaging technology provides a cost-effective tool for landscape-scale monitoring of a cryptic forest-dwelling species across all population densities. WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.1071/wr21034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Context Drones, or remotely piloted aircraft systems, equipped with thermal imaging technology (RPAS thermal imaging) have recently emerged as a powerful monitoring tool for koala populations. Before wide uptake of novel technologies by government, conservation practitioners and researchers, evidence of greater efficiency and cost-effectiveness than with other available methods is required. Aims We aimed to provide the first comprehensive analysis of the cost-effectiveness of RPAS thermal imaging for koala detection against two field-based methods, systematic spotlighting (Spotlight) and the refined diurnal radial search component of the spot-assessment technique (SAT). Methods We conducted various economic comparisons, particularly comparative cost-effectiveness of RPAS thermal imaging, Spotlight and SAT for repeat surveys of a low-density koala population. We compared methods on cost-effectiveness as well as long-term costs by using accumulating cost models. We also compared detection costs across population density using a predictive cost model. Key results Despite substantial hardware, training and licensing costs at the outset (>A$49 900), RPAS thermal imaging surveys were cost-effective, detecting the highest number of koalas per dollar spent. Modelling also suggested that RPAS thermal imaging requires the lowest survey effort to detect koalas within the range of publicly available koala population densities (~0.006–18 koalas ha−1) and would provide long-term cost reductions across longitudinal monitoring programs. RPAS thermal imaging would also require the lowest average survey effort costs at a landscape scale (A$3.84 ha−1), providing a cost-effective tool across large spatial areas. Conclusions Our analyses demonstrated drone thermal imaging technology as a cost-effective tool for conservation practitioners monitoring koala populations. Our analyses may also form the basis of decision-making tools to estimate survey effort or total program costs across any koala population density. Implications Our novel approach offers a means to perform various economic comparisons of available survey techniques and guide investment decisions towards developing standardised koala monitoring approaches. Our results may assist stakeholders and policymakers to confidently invest in RPAS thermal imaging technology and achieve optimal conservation outcomes for koala populations, with standardised data collection delivered through evidence-based and cost-effective monitoring programs.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wagner B, Baker PJ, Moore BD, Nitschke CR. Mapping canopy nitrogen-scapes to assess foraging habitat for a vulnerable arboreal folivore in mixed-species Eucalyptus forests. Ecol Evol 2021; 11:18401-18421. [PMID: 35003680 PMCID: PMC8717341 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Herbivore foraging decisions are closely related to plant nutritional quality. For arboreal folivores with specialized diets, such as the vulnerable greater glider (Petauroides volans), the abundance of suitable forage trees can influence habitat suitability and species occurrence. The ability to model and map foliar nitrogen would therefore enhance our understanding of folivore habitat use at finer scales. We tested whether high-resolution multispectral imagery, collected by a lightweight and low-cost commercial unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV), could be used to predict total and digestible foliar nitrogen (N and digN) at the tree canopy level and forest stand-scale from leaf-scale chemistry measurements across a gradient of mixed-species Eucalyptus forests in southeastern Australia. We surveyed temperate Eucalyptus forests across an elevational and topographic gradient from sea level to high elevation (50-1200 m a.s.l.) for forest structure, leaf chemistry, and greater glider occurrence. Using measures of multispectral leaf reflectance and spectral indices, we estimated N and digN and mapped N and favorable feeding habitat using machine learning algorithms. Our surveys covered 17 Eucalyptus species ranging in foliar N from 0.63% to 1.92% dry matter (DM) and digN from 0.45% to 1.73% DM. Both multispectral leaf reflectance and spectral indices were strong predictors for N and digN in model cross-validation. At the tree level, 79% of variability between observed and predicted measures of nitrogen was explained. A spatial supervised classification model correctly identified 80% of canopy pixels associated with high N concentrations (≥1% DM). We developed a successful method for estimating foliar nitrogen of a range of temperate Eucalyptus species using UAV multispectral imagery at the tree canopy level and stand scale. The ability to spatially quantify feeding habitat using UAV imagery allows remote assessments of greater glider habitat at a scale relevant to support ground surveys, management, and conservation for the vulnerable greater glider across southeastern Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Wagner
- School of Ecosystem and Forest SciencesThe University of MelbourneRichmond, VictoriaAustralia
| | - Patrick J. Baker
- School of Ecosystem and Forest SciencesThe University of MelbourneRichmond, VictoriaAustralia
| | - Ben D. Moore
- Hawkesbury Institute for the EnvironmentThe Western Sydney UniversityPenrith, NSWAustralia
| | - Craig R. Nitschke
- School of Ecosystem and Forest SciencesThe University of MelbourneRichmond, VictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
As a typical cyber-physical system, networked unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have received much attention in recent years. Emerging communication technologies and high-performance control methods enable networked UAVs to operate as aerial sensor networks to collect more complete and consistent information with significantly improved mobility and flexibility than traditional sensing platforms. One of the main applications of networked UAVs is surveillance and monitoring, which constitute essential components of a well-functioning public safety system and many industrial applications. Although the existing literature on surveillance and monitoring UAVs is extensive, a comprehensive survey on this topic is lacking. This article classifies publications on networked UAVs for surveillance and monitoring using the targets of interest and analyzes several typical problems on this topic, including the control, navigation, and deployment optimization of UAVs. The related research gaps and future directions are also presented.
Collapse
|
6
|
Corcoran E, Denman S, Hamilton G. Evaluating new technology for biodiversity monitoring: Are drone surveys biased? Ecol Evol 2021; 11:6649-6656. [PMID: 34141247 PMCID: PMC8207445 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Drones and machine learning-based automated detection methods are being used by ecologists to conduct wildlife surveys with increasing frequency. When traditional survey methods have been evaluated, a range of factors have been found to influence detection probabilities, including individual differences among conspecific animals, which can thus introduce biases into survey counts. There has been no such evaluation of drone-based surveys using automated detection in a natural setting. This is important to establish since any biases in counts made using these methods will need to be accounted for, to provide accurate data and improve decision-making for threatened species. In this study, a rare opportunity to survey a ground-truthed, individually marked population of 48 koalas in their natural habitat allowed for direct comparison of the factors impacting detection probability in both ground observation and drone surveys with manual and automated detection. We found that sex and host tree preferences impacted detection in ground surveys and in manual analysis of drone imagery with female koalas likely to be under-represented, and koalas higher in taller trees detected less frequently when present. Tree species composition of a forest stand also impacted on detections. In contrast, none of these factors impacted on automated detection. This suggests that the combination of drone-captured imagery and machine learning does not suffer from the same biases that affect conventional ground surveys. This provides further evidence that drones and machine learning are promising tools for gathering reliable detection data to better inform the management of threatened populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangeline Corcoran
- School of Biological and Environmental SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQldAustralia
| | - Simon Denman
- School of Electrical Engineering and RoboticsQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQldAustralia
| | - Grant Hamilton
- School of Biological and Environmental SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQldAustralia
| |
Collapse
|