Estimation of economic value for efficiency and animal health and welfare traits, teat and udder structure, in Canadian Angus cattle

The Canadian Angus Association recently developed genetic evaluations for teat and udder structure, which impact efficiencies, and animal health and welfare. Genetic selection tools are most effective incorporated into economic selection indexes. An important factor in the development of economic indexes is the estimation of the economic value and discounted gene expression coefficients, and thereby the economic weight, of each trait. Traditional estimation methods, interrogation of previous studies quantifying the impact of the traits and bioeconomic modelling, were reinforced using producer surveys that employed pairwise ranking methods. Estimates of discounted genetic expression coefficients, economic value and economic weight for teat and udder score in Canadian Angus cattle were 0.31 per sire, $52.47, and $16.91 per score change on a per calf born basis, respectively, indicating that functional traits such as teat and udder structure have a significant impact on profitability and should be included in genetic selection programmes. Limitations in previous studies illustrate the need for longitudinal studies on traits that impact efficiencies and animal health and welfare.

Genome-wide association study for mammary structure in Canadian Angus cows

Functional and enduring mammary structure is pivotal for producer profitability, and animal health and welfare in beef production. Genetic evaluations for teat and udder score in Canadian Angus cattle have previously been developed. The aim of this study was to identify genomic regions associated with teat and udder structure in Canadian Angus cows thereby enhancing knowledge of the biological architecture of these traits. Thus, we performed a weighted single-step genome wide association study (WssGWAS) to identify candidate genes for teat and udder score in 1,582 Canadian Angus cows typed with the GeneSeek^® Genomic Profiler Bovine 130K SNP array. Genomically enhanced estimated breeding values (GEBVs) were converted to SNP marker effects using unequal variances for markers to calculate weights for each SNP over three iterations. At the genome wide level, we detected windows of 20 consecutive SNPs that explained more than 0.5% of the variance observed in these traits. A total of 35 and 28 windows were identified for teat and udder score, respectively, with two SNP windows in common for both traits. Using Ensembl, the SNP windows were used to search for candidate genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL). A total of 94 and 71 characterized genes were identified in the regions for teat and udder score, respectively. Of these, 7 genes were common for both traits. Gene network and enrichment analysis, using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), signified key pathways unique to each trait. Genes of interest were associated with immune response and wound healing, adipose tissue development and morphology, and epithelial and vascular development and morphology. Genetic architecture from this GWAS confirms that teat and udder score are distinct, polygenic traits involving varying and complex biological pathways, and that genetic selection for improved teat and udder score is possible.

Development of optimal genetic evaluations for teat and udder structure in Canadian Angus cattle

Despite their heritability and influence on female productivity, there are currently no genetic evaluations for teat and udder structure in Canadian Angus cattle. The objective of this study was to develop optimal genetic evaluations for these traits in the Canadian Angus population. Guidelines recommended by Beef Improvement Federation (BIF) were used to score teat and udder structure in 1,735 Canadian Angus cows from 10 representative herds. Cows scored ranged in parity from 1 to 13; however, >70% of cows were parity ≤4. Scores ranged from 1 (large, bottle shaped) to 9 (very small) for teats and from 1 (very pendulous) to 9 (very tight) for udders. Consistent with parity distribution, >70% of teat and udder scores were ≥6. Teat and udder scores (TS9 and US9, respectively) were modeled using a multiple trait animal model with random effects of contemporary group (herd-year-season) and additive genetic effect, and fixed effects of breed, parity group, and days between calving and scoring. To test good versus poor structure, a binary classification of 1 or 2 (TS2, US2) [comprised of scores 1 to 5 = 1 (poor structure) and scores 6 to 9 = 2 (good structure)] was created. Further, to assess the impact of grouping less frequently observed poor scores, a 1 to 7 scale (TS7, US7) was created by combining teat and udder scores 1 to 3. Analyses for teat and udder scores on scales TS9, US9, TS7, US7, and TS2, US2 were compared. In addition, both threshold and linear animal models were used to estimate variance components for the traits. Data treatment and models were evaluated based on correlation of resulting estimated breeding value (EBV) with corrected phenotypes, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, average EBV accuracies (r), and deviance information criteria (DIC). TS9, US9 scales for teat and udder scores and linear models performed best. Estimates of heritability (SE) for teat and udder score were 0.32 (0.06) and 0.15 (0.04), respectively, indicating these traits were moderately heritable and that genetic improvement for teat and udder scores was possible. Estimates of phenotypic and genotypic correlations for teat and udder score were 0.46 (0.02) and 0.71 (0.09), respectively. Estimates of genotypic correlations with birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), and yearling weight (YW), ranged from -0.04 (0.10) to -0.20 (0.12), verifying the importance of selecting for improved teat and udder score as individual traits, alongside performance traits.

Genetic analysis of calf health in Charolais beef cattle

The objective of this study was to investigate the factors that influence calf health and survival in Charolais cattle. Data from 2,740 calves, originating from 16 French farms and observed from birth until 30 d of age, were analyzed using models that took account of direct genetic, maternal genetic, and common environmental effects. Both direct and maternal genetic parameters were estimated for birth weight (BW), calving ease (CE), neonatal vitality (NV), survival at 30 d (Surv), and umbilical infection and diarrhea at different ages (0 to 5 d: Umb1 and Diar1; 6 to 20 d: Umb2 and Diar2; and 21 to 30 d: Umb3 and Diar3). The heritability values for direct and maternal genetic effects were, 0.026 (SE = 0.027) and 0.096 (SE = 0.042) for Surv, 0.280 (SE = 0.063) and 0.063 (SE = 0.038) for BW, 0.129 (SE = 0.041) and 0 for CE, 0.073 (SE = 0.035) and 0 for NV, 0.071 (SE = 0.038) and 0.017 (SE = 0.026) for Umb1, 0 and 0.082 (SE = 0.029) for Umb2, 0 and 0.044 (SE = 0.030) for Diar1, 0.016 (SE = 0.022) and 0.012 (SE = 0.026) for Diar2, and 0.016 (SE = 0.028) and 0 for Diar3, respectively. Significant genetic variability in beef cattle was thus revealed for five calf health traits: NV, Surv, Diar1, Umb1, and Umb2. In addition, for three traits (Surv, Diar1, and Umb2), maternal genetic effects clearly contributed more to health performance than direct genetic effects. Estimates of genetic correlation between traits varied markedly (from 0 to 1 in absolute values) depending on the traits in question, the age for a given trait, and the type (direct or maternal) of the genetic effects considered. These results suggest that not all health traits in Charolais cattle can be improved simultaneously, and breeders will therefore have to prioritize certain traits of interest in their breeding objectives. Overall, our results demonstrate the potential utility of collecting and integrating data on calf diseases, NV and survival in future beef cattle breeding programs. To ensure appropriate biological and genetic evaluations of calf health performance, it is important to accurately describe the phenotypes for diarrhea and umbilical infections (in terms of age ranges) and account for maternal genetic and common environmental effects that explain calf health performance traits. Further investigation and improved data collection are now necessary to maximize the efficiency of breeding schemes designed to simultaneously improve production and health traits.

Litter size at lambing influences genetic evaluation of maternal rearing ability

The genetic parameters for maternal rearing-ability of ewes were investigated by ignoring or defining the rearing ability trait separately by litter-size class (singles versus multiples) using multi-generational data from three, fully pedigreed Merino flocks differing in prolificacy, production level and environment. Genetic correlations (ra) between litter size (LSIZE) and the percentage of lambs surviving (PLSURV) were more negative with an increasing mean flock litter size (ra: –0.21 ± 0.17 to –0.73 ± 0.08), while the corresponding range in phenotypic correlations (rp) was substantially lower (rp: –0.15 ± 0.01 to –0.33 ± 0.01). Rearing-ability traits defined separately by litter-size class were highly correlated (ra: 0.49 ± 0.19 to 0.64 ± 0.38), but not genetically identical traits in the most prolific flock. Defining rearing-ability traits separately by litter-size class reduced the antagonistic genetic correlations between LSIZE and PLSURV to between –0.39 ± 0.14 and 0.14 ± 0.28, through accommodating the change in mean and variance of PLSURV with LSIZE. Similarly, linear transformation (TSURV) of PLSURV within each litter size to a common mean and variance reduced the antagonistic trend in genetic correlations between LSIZE and TSURV to range between –0.05 ± 0.17 and –0.43 ± 0.13. Since genetic correlations are low to moderate between TSURV and LSIZE, it is possible to select for improvements in both the number of lambs born and lamb survival simultaneously. Defining rearing-ability traits separately by litter-size class and the role of transformation will be investigated further for improving the accuracy of genetic evaluation for rearing ability across a range of flocks, breeds and environmental conditions using more extensive industry data.

Heritability of udder morphology and colostrum quality traits in swine

The heritability of udder quality traits, defined as morphology and colostrum IgG concentration at farrowing, was estimated together with the genetic and phenotypic correlations of these traits with other production and reproduction criteria. Udder morphology traits were recorded in 988 Meidam sows and colostrum samples were collected from 528 sows. Teat length, teat diameter (DIA), interteat distance within the same row (SAMER), and teat distance from the abdominal midline (AML) were recorded to the nearest millimeter. For each sow, a record was also made of udder development score (DEV), the proportion of teats oriented perpendicular to the udder, and the proportion of nonfunctional teats. Colostrum IgG concentration was estimated with a Brix refractometer. Heritability of udder morphology traits varied from high ( = 0.46 for teat length and = 0.56 for DIA) to moderate ( = 0.37 for SAMER, = 0.22 for AML, = 0.25 for DEV, = 0.3 for the proportion of nonfunctional teats, = 0.1 for the proportion of teats oriented perpendicular to the udder, and = 0.35 for colostrum IgG concentration). The SAMER was negatively genetically correlated with the number of stillborns (genetic correlation [] = -0.48) and positively genetically correlated with the number of piglets born alive ( = 0.69), with the opposite for the trait AML ( = -0.40 for number of piglets born alive and = 0.40 for stillborns). The highest genetic correlation with productive traits was estimated between AML and ADG during rearing ( = 0.42), although this had a negative phenotypic correlation (; -0.11). Teat length was also moderately correlated with ADG ( = 0.27). Backfat thickness at 100 kg was positively correlated with DIA and the total number of teats present in both rows ( = 0.28 and = 0.36, respectively) and negatively correlated only with DEV ( = -0.22). The same results were found for the phenotypic correlation between backfat thickness at end of test and the total number of teats present in both rows ( = 0.03). Udder quality traits can be included in the breeding goal and appropriately weighted with other important traits in the breeding objectives to enhance maternal performance.

Estimation of genetic parameters for udder traits in Hereford cattle

The objective was to estimate genetic parameters for udder traits in Hereford cattle. American Hereford Association (AHA) members initially recorded an overall score based on all udder characteristics. In 2008, the Beef Improvement Federation established guidelines, which were subsequently adopted by the AHA, for evaluating udder suspension and teat size. Therefore, a female was scored for either overall score or udder suspension and teat size for a single lactation, and females may be evaluated for overall score for a parity and then for udder suspension and teat size at a later parity. In all cases, subjective scores were assigned at parturition and ranged from 1 to 9, with a score of 9 considered ideal. Records on 48,191 animals and a 3-generation pedigree with 126,814 animals were obtained from the AHA, Kansas City, MO. These records contained repeated observations for overall score (n = 73,469), suspension (n = 38,412), and teat size (n = 38,412). Because the distribution of scores for all traits peaked at 7, a linear approximation was used in the analysis. Data were modeled using a multiple-trait animal model with random effects of additive genetic and permanent environment, fixed effect of contemporary group (herd-year-season), and a linear covariate for age in days. Heritability estimates (SE) for overall score, suspension, and teat size were 0.32 (0.01), 0.32 (0.01), and 0.28 (0.01), respectively. Through genetic selection for these traits, beef producers could improve udder traits. Repeatability estimates (SE) for overall score, suspension, and teat size were 0.45 (0.005), 0.47 (0.01), and 0.44 (0.01), respectively. Producers should continue evaluating udder traits repeatedly throughout a cow's lifetime. The phenotypic correlation (SE) between suspension and teat size was 0.64 (0.004) with 57% of records for suspension and teat size having the same score for both traits. The genetic correlations (SE) between teat size and suspension, overall score and teat size, and overall score and suspension were 0.81 (0.01), 0.71 (0.03), and 0.69 (0.03), respectively, and selection for one trait should result in correlated responses in the other traits. In conclusion, traits were moderately repeatable with scores from a parity being informative for subsequent parities. Because overall score, udder suspension, and teat size were moderately heritable with strong, positive genetic correlations, genetic improvement for these traits can be achieved through selection.