1
|
Biehl MV, de Ferraz Junior MVC, Barroso JPR, Susin I, Ferreira EM, Polizel DM, Pires AV. The reused progesterone device has the same effect on short or long estrus synchronization protocols in tropical sheep. Trop Anim Health Prod 2019; 51:1545-1549. [PMID: 30778808 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-01841-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of progesterone (P4) device reutilization in long and short protocols for transcervical timed artificial insemination (TAI) in Santa Inês ewes. A total of 275 multiparous lactating ewes were blocked according to body weight (BW, 49.1 ± 7.3 means ± SE), body condition score (BCS, 2.9 ± 0.4; scale of 1-5), and days postpartum (50 ± 8.2 days), and allocated to one of the treatments. The treatments were arranged in a factorial design, in which the factor 1 was the P4 device type (new or a device of 0.3 g of P4 previously used by 11 days), and the factor 2 was the short or long TAI protocol (P4 device remained by 7 or 11 days, respectively). At device removal, all ewes received 300 IU eCG and 6.70 mg of Dinoprost tromethamine. After TAI protocol, ewes remained with ram by 21 days. There was no interaction between factors in any variables. Ewes that received a new P4 device delayed (P = 0.05) to show estrus compared with ewes receiving a previously used P4 device, but it did not affect pregnancy rate. The long protocol tended to increase pregnancy rate compared with short protocol (33% vs. 24%, respectively; P = 0.07). However, the pregnancy rate at the end of reproductive period was similar in both groups (about 84%). Thus, the use of long protocols tended to improve reproductive performance, and the reused P4 device did not affect pregnancy rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Vinicius Biehl
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil
| | | | - José Paulo Roman Barroso
- Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brazil
| | - Ivanete Susin
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil
| | - Evandro Maia Ferreira
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil
| | - Daniel Montanher Polizel
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Vaz Pires
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil. .,Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brazil. .,Animal Science Department, University of Sao Paulo - ESALQ, Pádua Dias, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|