1
|
Li Y, McIntyre KM, Rasmussen P, Gilbert W, Chaters G, Raymond K, Jemberu WT, Larkins A, Patterson GT, Kwok S, Kappes AJ, Mayberry D, Schrobback P, Acosta MH, Stacey DA, Huntington B, Bruce M, Knight-Jones T, Rushton J. Rationalising development of classification systems describing livestock production systems for disease burden analysis within the Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme. Res Vet Sci 2024; 168:105102. [PMID: 38215653 DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.105102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
The heterogeneity that exists across the global spectrum of livestock production means that livestock productivity, efficiency, health expenditure and health outcomes vary across production systems. To ensure that burden of disease estimates are specific to the represented livestock population and people reliant upon them, livestock populations need to be systematically classified into different types of production system, reflective of the heterogeneity across production systems. This paper explores the data currently available of livestock production system classifications and animal health through a scoping review as a foundation for the development of a framework that facilitates more specific estimates of livestock disease burdens. A top-down framework to classification is outlined based on a systematic review of existing classification methods and provides a basis for simple grouping of livestock at global scale. The proposed top-down classification framework, which is dominated by commodity focus of production along with intensity of resource use, may have less relevance at the sub-national level in some jurisdictions and will need to be informed and adapted with information on how countries themselves categorize livestock and their production systems. The findings in this study provide a foundation for analysing animal health burdens across a broad level of production systems. The developed framework will fill a major gap in how livestock production and health are currently approached and analysed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Li
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture and Food, 4067 Brisbane, Australia; School of Veterinary Medicine and Centre for Biosecurity and One Health, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Australia.
| | - K Marie McIntyre
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK; Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, IC2 Building, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK
| | - Philip Rasmussen
- Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Section for Animal Welfare and Disease Control, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Section for Epidemiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - William Gilbert
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, IC2 Building, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK
| | - Gemma Chaters
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, IC2 Building, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK
| | - Kassy Raymond
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Computer Science, University of Guelph, Canada
| | - Wudu T Jemberu
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; International Livestock Research Institute, P O Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; University of Gondar, P. O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Andrew Larkins
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Veterinary Medicine and Centre for Biosecurity and One Health, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Australia
| | - Grace T Patterson
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Computer Science, University of Guelph, Canada
| | - Stephen Kwok
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Veterinary Medicine and Centre for Biosecurity and One Health, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Australia
| | - Alexander James Kappes
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Economic Sciences & Paul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, USA
| | - Dianne Mayberry
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture and Food, 4067 Brisbane, Australia
| | - Peggy Schrobback
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture and Food, 4067 Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mario Herrero Acosta
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, 250C Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Deborah A Stacey
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Computer Science, University of Guelph, Canada
| | - Benjamin Huntington
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, IC2 Building, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK
| | - Mieghan Bruce
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; School of Veterinary Medicine and Centre for Biosecurity and One Health, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Australia
| | - Theodore Knight-Jones
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; International Livestock Research Institute, P O Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Jonathan Rushton
- Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) Programme; Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, IC2 Building, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jalata B, Goshu HA, Mediksa T, Bekele D, Aliye M. Reproductive performance of Horro and Horro-crossbred dairy cows in Ethiopia's subhumid tropical environments. Trop Anim Health Prod 2023; 55:323. [PMID: 37749411 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-023-03718-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Estrus detection, timing of insemination, feeding, and health care practices are all factors that can significantly affect cattle breeding efficiency and lifetime production. In Ethiopia's subhumid environment, the age at first calving, number of days open, duration from calving to first heat, and number of services per conception are economic traits that affect reproductive performance of Horro and Horro-crossbred dairy cows. Data collected at Ethiopia's Bako Agricultural Research Center between 1980-2019 was used to study the reproductive performance of Horro and Horro-crosses with Holstein Friesian and Jersey dairy cows. We identified overall mean ± standard error values of factors that affect reproductive performance, including age at first service (AFS) (29.2 ± 0.2 months), age at first calving (AFC) (39.8 ± 0.2 months), number of services per conception (NSC) (1.76 ± 0.4 months), calving interval (CI) (13.2 ± 0.3 months), days open (DO) (94.3 ± 4.3 days), conception rate (CR) (75.0 ± 1.3%), and replacement rate (RR) (28.4 ± 0.3%). The odds ratios of the 60-day and 90-day nonreturn rates (NRR) were 0.22 and 0.96, respectively. Sire and dam breed and birth period had significant (P < 0.001) effects on AFS and AFC, while season and dam parity had significant effects on CI and DO. Inconsistencies regarding feeding, heat detection, inseminator skills, insemination timing, animal health, and other husbandry practices may extend periods of AFS, AFC, CI, and DO. To optimize reproductive performance in Horro cows and Horro crossbreeds in Ethiopia's subhumid environments, improving management practices should be a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Habtamu Abera Goshu
- Bio and Emerging Technology Institute (BETin) and Ministry of Innovation and Technology, PO Box 5954, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Tesfaye Mediksa
- Bako Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 03, Bako, Ethiopia
| | - Dereje Bekele
- Bako Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 03, Bako, Ethiopia
| | - Mohammed Aliye
- Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 3, Jimma, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiambiro G, Madzimure J, Mpofu IDT. Constraints and opportunities of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) silage production and utilisation by smallholder milk production sector in Zimbabwe. Trop Anim Health Prod 2022; 54:105. [PMID: 35165811 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03084-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The objective of the scoping research was to evaluate the current situation, constraints and opportunities of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) silage production and utilisation by the smallholder dairy farmers in Zimbabwe. Cross sectional surveys were conducted from 61 households of six milk producers' associations (MPAs) in Chipinge, Gokwe, Mutasa, Seke, and Umzingwane districts, which were in different agro-ecological regions of Zimbabwe. Purposive and stratified random sampling was done to select households to administer structured questionnaires so as to collect data on socio-economic characteristics and dairy production. Key informant' interviews, case studies, and focus group discussions were the other data collection tools used. Total MPA dairy herd size mean differed (P < 0.05) in all MPAs averaging 16, ranging from 1 to 41 herd. Mafumise MPA had the least (P < 0.05) dairy herd size (7), whilst Gokwe, Tsonzo, Marirangwe, Claremont, and Umzingwane MPAs, had similar herd sizes (P > 0.05). There were positive (P < 0.001) relations between MPAs by seasonal milk yields, lactation days, calving intervals, dry days for different dairy breeds. Milk yields across MPAs and breeds were seasonally sensitive, being high in the wet season than dry season. All farmers (100%) had access to formal milk markets such as Milk Collection Centres, large dairy processors, and parallel markets. Farmers indicated non preference of sweet sorghum silage by their cattle as well as recurring drought affected their maize silage production. Farmers lacked knowledge on how to improve utilisation of sweet sorghum silage by using yeast, and bacteria and this justifies the need to use these probiotics in mitigating utilisation challenges for sustainable milk production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Givemore Chiambiro
- Fintrac International, USAID Feed the Future Zimbabwe Fostering Agribusiness for Resilient Markets Program, Westgate Shopping Complex, Suites 1 & 2 Westgate House West, Harare, Zimbabwe
- Department of Animal Production and Technology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology, P. Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe
| | - James Madzimure
- Department of Animal Production and Technology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology, P. Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe.
| | - Irvin D T Mpofu
- Department of Animal Production and Technology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology, P. Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|