Use of methane production data for genetic prediction in beef cattle: A review

Methane (CH4) is a greenhouse gas that is produced and emitted from ruminant animals through enteric fermentation. Methane production from cattle has an environmental impact and is an energetic inefficiency. In the beef industry, CH4 production from enteric fermentation impacts all three pillars of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic. A variety of factors influence the quantity of CH4 produced during enteric fermentation, including characteristics of the rumen and feed composition. There are several methodologies available to either quantify or estimate CH4 production from cattle, all with distinct advantages and disadvantages. Methodologies include respiration calorimetry, the sulfur-hexafluoride tracer technique, infrared spectroscopy, prediction models, and the GreenFeed system. Published studies assess the accuracy of the various methodologies and compare estimates from different methods. There are advantages and disadvantages of each technology as they relate to the use of these phenotypes in genetic evaluation systems. Heritability and variance components of CH4 production have been estimated using the different CH4 quantification methods. Agreement in both the amounts of CH4 emitted and heritability estimates of CH4 emissions between various measurement methodologies varies in the literature. Using greenhouse gas traits in selection indices along with relevant output traits could provide producers with a tool to make selection decisions on environmental sustainability while also considering productivity. The objective of this review was to discuss factors that influence CH4 production, methods to quantify CH4 production for genetic evaluation, and genetic parameters of CH4 production in beef cattle.

Characterization of the number of spot samples required for quantification of gas fluxes and metabolic heat production from grazing beef cows using a GreenFeed

Enteric fermentation from cattle results in greenhouse gas production that is an environmental concern and also an energetic loss. Several methods exist to quantify gas fluxes; however, an open circuit gas quantification system (OCGQS) allows for unencumbered quantification of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and oxygen (O2) from grazing cattle. While previous literature has proven the accuracy of an OCGQS, little work has been done to establish the minimum number of spot samples required to best evaluate an individual grazing animal's gas fluxes and metabolic heat production. A GreenFeed system (C-Lock Inc.) was used to collect at least 100 spot samples each from 17 grazing cows. The mean gas fluxes and metabolic heat production were computed starting from the first 10 visits (forward) and increasing by increments of 10 until an animal had 100 visits. Mean gas fluxes and metabolic heat production were also computed starting from visit 100 (reverse) in increments of 10 using the same approach. Pearson and Spearman correlations were computed between the full 100 visits and each shortened visit interval. A large increase in correlations were seen between 30 and 40 visits. Thus, mean forward and reverse gas fluxes and metabolic heat production were also computed starting at 30 visits and increasing by 2 until 40 visits. The minimum number of spot samples was determined when correlations with the full 100 visits were greater than 0.95. The results indicated that the minimum numbers of spot samples needed for accurate quantification of CH4, CO2, and O2 gas fluxes are 38, 40, and 40, respectively. Metabolic heat production can be calculated using gas fluxes collected by the OCGQS with 36 spot samples. Practically, calculation of metabolic heat production will require 40 spot samples because the component gases for metabolic heat calculation require up to 40 spot samples. Published literature from nongrazing (confined) environments recommended a similar number of total spot samples. Large variation existed around the average number of spot samples for an animal per day, therefore a wide range of test durations may be needed to meet the same number of spot samples in different populations. For this reason, protocols for the OCGQS should be based on the total number of spot samples, rather than a test duration.

Selection for lower residual feed intake in mice is accompanied by increased body fatness and lower activity but not lower metabolic rate

Context Mice bred to be genetically different in feed efficiency were used in this experiment designed to help improve our knowledge of the biological basis of variation in feed efficiency between individual animals. Aims This experiment used mice to explore the metabolic basis of genetic variation in feed efficiency in the growing animal. Methods Mice bred to differ in residual feed intake (RFI) recorded over a postweaning test were used. After 11 generations of divergent selection, mice in groups were tested for RFI from 6 to 8, 8 to 10, and 10 to 12 weeks of age, and measured for traits describing the ability to digest feed, body composition, protein turnover, basal and resting metabolic rate, and level of activity. Key results Compared with the low-RFI (high efficiency) line mice, high-RFI mice consumed 28% more feed per day over their RFI-test, were no heavier, were leaner (16% less total fat per unit of bodyweight), did not differ in the fractional synthesis rate of protein in skeletal muscle or in liver, and had similar basal metabolic rates at 33°C. On an energy basis, the selection lines did not differ in energy retained in body tissue gain, which represented only 1.8% of metabolisable energy intake. The remaining 98.2% was lost as heat. Of the processes measured contributing to the higher feed intake by the high-RFI mice, 47% of the extra feed consumed was lost in faeces and urine, activity was 84% higher and accounted for 24%, the cost of protein gain was 6% higher and accounted for 2%, and the energy cost of digesting and absorbing the extra feed consumed and basal heat production could have accounted for 11 and 15% each. Conclusions Selection for low RFI (high efficiency) in mice was accompanied by an increase in body fat, an improvement in the process of digestion, a lower rate of protein turnover and a much lower level of activity. Selection did not result in major change in basal metabolic rate. Implications This experiment with mice provided new information on the biological basis of genetic differences in feed efficiency. The experiment investigated the relative importance of major energy-consuming metabolic processes and was able to quantify the responses in protein turnover and level of activity, being responses in energy-consuming processes that have proven difficult to quantitatively demonstrate in large farm animals.