[The general practitioner in old age homes : an incongruous actor ? Study in old-age homes in a deprived area]

CONTEXT

Residential facilities for dependent elderly people have difficulties ensuring medical follow-up of their residents by general practitioners. The barriers to medical visits are well-known. Seine-Saint-Denis is particularly affected by the medical demography crisis.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the organization of visits by general practitioners in residential facilities for dependent elderly people in Seine-Saint-Denis. To assess the influence of the institutions' status on this organization.

METHOD

Quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study of 65 facilities in Seine Saint-Denis. A questionnaire drawn from the literature on known barriers to medical visits was used.

RESULTS

Fifty institutions (76.9%) contributed. Most visits (88.0%) took place in patients' rooms. When the practitioner arrived, the patient was present at the site in 80.0% of the facilities, especially when they were private and associative (p = 0.01). The doctor was accompanied by a staff member in 30.0% of the facilities, especially when they were for-profit (p = 0.02). Exchanges between general practitioners and the staff were sporadic and unorganized. All in all, the public facilities seemed to be less well-organized to receive general practitioners.

DISCUSSION

Residential facilities for the elderly do not seem to have implemented specific organization for visits by general practitioners, who are not integrated in the staff.

CONCLUSION

Experiments with doctors gainfully employed in institutions could be carried out, following the example of several foreign countries.

The importance of supportive relationships with general practitioners, hospitals and pharmacists for mothers who 'give medicines' to children with severe and profound intellectual disabilities

A purposeful sample of 15 mothers of children with severe and profound intellectual disabilities participated in this hermeneutic phenomenological study through interviews and completion of a diary. The aim of the study was to explore mothers' lived experience of 'giving medicines' to children with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Findings yielded multiple themes, one of which gave insight into the importance of supportive relationships with health professionals. The general practitioner (GP), hospital and pharmacist are key in providing supportive elements to mothers' daily role. Having the support of a helpful GP was key in helping mothers cope on a daily basis for child related queries on illness, getting prescriptions or seeking advice. Accessibility to the hospital and avoiding the emergency department with their child was recommended. The pharmacist was central to the daily activities relating to 'giving medicines' and a good relationship resulted in a happier mother.

Home sweet home: GPs' response to an increase in the fee size for home visits

In many health care systems GPs receive fees for their services. Policymakers may use the size of these fees to try to incentivise GPs to provide more care. However, evidence is mixed on whether and how GPs respond to an increase in the fee size. This study investigates how GPs respond to an average increase of 150% in the fee for a high-effort and infrequent service such as a home visit due to patients' illness. We consider Danish GPs' provision of these visits to enlisted patients living outside of nursing homes. Using linear regressions with general practice fixed effects and a rich number of control variables, we estimate the association between GPs' provision of these home visits and the fee rise. On average, we find no association between the fee rise and GPs' provision of home visits. However, we find that GPs who previously provided the fewest home visits to eligible patients increase their provision by 13% after the fee rise compared to other GPs. This increase in visits is driven by more patients receiving multiple visits after the fee rise. We conclude that a fee rise may not yield a strong response in GPs' provision of high-effort and infrequent services such as home visits.

Time to retire? A register-based study of GPs' practice style prior to retirement

In many healthcare systems a large share of general practitioners (GPs) is retiring. The literature has shown a negative correlation between physicians' age and their quality of care. However, little is known about whether GPs exhibit different practice styles in the years prior to retirement. This study investigates whether GPs who are closer to retirement make different professional choices than GPs who are not as close to retirement. Using detailed administrative data on 555 Danish GPs and their patients from 2005 to 2017, we study GPs' practice styles across a ten-year period prior to retirement and compare these with GPs who retire at a later date ('non-retiring GPs'), while controlling for age differences as well as exogenous factors affecting healthcare provision. We focus on the GPs' number of enlisted patients, revenue, provision of consultations, and treatment behaviour in consultations. We find no differences between retiring and non-retiring GPs for key outcomes such as 'revenue per patient' and 'consultations per patient'. However, we find that retiring GPs have fewer enlisted patients in their final years of practicing. This finding is driven by more patients leaving rather than fewer patients joining their lists. We also find that retirement is associated with other dimensions of GPs' practice style, e.g. their provision of home visits, prescribing, and referral rates. Overall, we find a modest association between GPs' retirement and their practice style.