1
|
Improving the Physical Health of Psychiatric Hospital Residents: An Evaluation of an Obesity Education Program for Mental Health Professionals. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10101851. [PMID: 36292296 PMCID: PMC9601487 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: People living with mental health disorders are at increased risk for developing obesity due to poor diet, physical inactivity, and antipsychotic medications. In the United States, the obesity rate is 36% in the general population and more than 50% for people living with mental health disorders. Although mental health clinicians concentrate on managing psychiatric disorders, they seldom recognize the gradual increase in body mass index of their patients. The result is a disconnection between the clinical management of psychiatric disorders and the medical management of obesity. Purpose: This study assessed the effectiveness of an evidence-based education program for improving the obesity management practices of mental health clinicians caring for residents at a state psychiatric hospital. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study design with a pretest and posttest evaluation. Convenience sampling was used to recruit mental health professionals, or clinicians, at a large psychiatric hospital in the Southern region of the United States. Data was collected with the Advising and Treating Overweight and Obese Patient questionnaire (17 items). Data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings were reported in accordance with the TREND and GREET guidelines. Results: The education program was completed by 50 MHCs. The pretest indicated that 76% of MHCs were not involved in helping obese residents manage their weight, but the posttest indicated 90% were involved. There was a significant increase in MHC knowledge about obesity management and reported actions 90-days after the program. MHCs were unable to arrange follow-up visits for residents, a task not directly within their control. Conclusions: Mental health clinicians reported increased knowledge and improved clinical practice after an education program. Because the outcomes were reported at 90-days after the program, further research needs to evaluate the longitudinal impact of this type of program, where the reported behaviors are correlated to process and clinical outcome measures for obesity.
Collapse
|
2
|
An Audit of Mental Health Care Plans in Community Mental Health Services for Older Persons in Rural Communities in a State in Australia. J Behav Health Serv Res 2022; 49:162-189. [PMID: 35000103 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-021-09775-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Mental health care planning is an important part of holistic, patient-centred care provision. Rural older adults represent a vulnerable population with unique and complex care needs requiring robust care planning approaches. This study's aim was to audit care plan documentation for rural older Australians against quality standards. A retrospective review of the care plans from electronic case records was performed for all patients who were 65 years or older and managed by rural community mental health teams over a 12-month period. 72.1% of patients had a care plan available. Multiple assessment areas were sparsely documented, such as cognition (32%), self-harm risk assessments (29.8%), visual impairment (5.5%), hearing issues (5%) and Advance Care Directives (35.4%). This study highlighted the need for the development and implementation of a care plan template specific to rural older patients. Further research into care planning processes and barriers to implementation is also required for this population.
Collapse
|
3
|
Goebel MC, Trautner BW, Wang Y, Van JN, Dillon LM, Patel PK, Drekonja DM, Graber CJ, Shukla BS, Lichtenberger P, Helfrich CD, Sales A, Grigoryan L. Organizational readiness assessment in acute and long-term care has important implications for antibiotic stewardship for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control 2020; 48:1322-1328. [PMID: 32437753 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior to implementing an antibiotic stewardship intervention for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), we assessed institutional barriers to change using the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment. METHODS Surveys were self-administered on paper in inpatient medicine and long-term care units at 4 Veterans Affairs facilities. Participants included providers, nurses, and pharmacists. The survey included 7 subscales: evidence (perceived strength of evidence) and six context subscales (favorability of organizational context). Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS One hundred four surveys were completed (response rate = 69.3%). Overall, the evidence subscale had the highest score; the resources subscale (mean 2.8) was significantly lower than other subscales (P < .001). Scores for budget and staffing resources were lower than scores for training and facility resources (P < .001 for both). Pharmacists had lower scores than providers for the staff culture subscale (P = .04). The site with the lowest scores for resources (mean 2.4) also had lower scores for leadership and lower pharmacist effort devoted to stewardship. CONCLUSIONS Although healthcare professionals endorsed the evidence about nontreatment of ASB, perceived barriers to antibiotic stewardship included inadequate resources and leadership support. These findings provide targets for tailoring the stewardship intervention to maximize success.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bergström A, Ehrenberg A, Eldh AC, Graham ID, Gustafsson K, Harvey G, Hunter S, Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Wallin L. The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice-a citation analysis of the literature. Implement Sci 2020; 15:68. [PMID: 32854718 PMCID: PMC7450685 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01003-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework was developed two decades ago and conceptualizes successful implementation (SI) as a function (f) of the evidence (E) nature and type, context (C) quality, and the facilitation (F), [SI = f (E,C,F)]. Despite a growing number of citations of theoretical frameworks including PARIHS, details of how theoretical frameworks are used remains largely unknown. This review aimed to enhance the understanding of the breadth and depth of the use of the PARIHS framework. METHODS This citation analysis commenced from four core articles representing the key stages of the framework's development. The citation search was performed in Web of Science and Scopus. After exclusion, we undertook an initial assessment aimed to identify articles using PARIHS and not only referencing any of the core articles. To assess this, all articles were read in full. Further data extraction included capturing information about where (country/countries and setting/s) PARIHS had been used, as well as categorizing how the framework was applied. Also, strengths and weaknesses, as well as efforts to validate the framework, were explored in detail. RESULTS The citation search yielded 1613 articles. After applying exclusion criteria, 1475 articles were read in full, and the initial assessment yielded a total of 367 articles reported to have used the PARIHS framework. These articles were included for data extraction. The framework had been used in a variety of settings and in both high-, middle-, and low-income countries. With regard to types of use, 32% used PARIHS in planning and delivering an intervention, 50% in data analysis, 55% in the evaluation of study findings, and/or 37% in any other way. Further analysis showed that its actual application was frequently partial and generally not well elaborated. CONCLUSIONS In line with previous citation analysis of the use of theoretical frameworks in implementation science, we also found a rather superficial description of the use of PARIHS. Thus, we propose the development and adoption of reporting guidelines on how framework(s) are used in implementation studies, with the expectation that this will enhance the maturity of implementation science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bergström
- Department of Women’s and Children’s health, Uppsala Global Health Research on Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Uppsala, Sweden
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Ehrenberg
- School of Education, Health, and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ann Catrine Eldh
- Department of Medicine and Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ian D. Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Kazuko Gustafsson
- School of Education, Health, and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- University Library, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah Hunter
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jo Rycroft-Malone
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancashire, UK
| | - Lars Wallin
- School of Education, Health, and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Battersby M, Kidd MR, Licinio J, Aylward P, Baker A, Ratcliffe J, Quinn S, Castle DJ, Zabeen S, Fairweather-Schmidt AK, Lawn S. Improving cardiovascular health and quality of life in people with severe mental illness: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:366. [PMID: 29996886 PMCID: PMC6042320 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2748-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The estimated 300,000 adults in Australia with severe mental illness (SMI) have markedly reduced life expectancy compared to the general population, mainly due to physical health comorbidities. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the commonest cause of early death and people with SMI have high rates of most modifiable risk factors, with associated quality of life (QoL) reduction. High blood pressure, smoking, dyslipidaemia, diabetes and obesity are major modifiable CVD risk factors. Poor delivery of recommended monitoring and risk reduction is a national and international problem. Therefore, effective preventive interventions to safeguard and support physical health are urgently needed in this population. Methods This trial used a rigorous process, including extensive piloting, to develop an intervention that delivers recommended physical health care to reduce CVD risk and improve QoL for people with SMI. Components of this intervention are integrated using the Flinders Program of chronic condition management (CCM) which is a comprehensive psychosocial care planning approach that places the patient at the centre of their care, and focuses on building their self-management capacity within a collaborative approach, therefore providing a recovery-oriented framework. The primary project aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and health economics of the CCM intervention. The main outcome measures examine CVD risk and quality of life. The second aim is to identify essential components, enablers and barriers at patient, clinical and organisational levels for national, sustained implementation of recommended physical health care delivery to people with SMI. Participants will be recruited from a community-based public psychiatric service. Discussion This study constitutes the first large-scale trial, worldwide, using the Flinders Program with this population. By combining a standardised yet flexible motivational process with a targeted set of evidence-based interventions, the chief aim is to reduce CVD risk by 20%. If achieved, this will be a ground-breaking outcome, and the program will be subsequently translated nationwide and abroad. The trial will be of great interest to people with mental illness, family carers, mental health services, governments and primary care providers because the Flinders Program can be delivered in diverse settings by any clinical discipline and supervised peers. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000474358. Registered on 31 March 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2748-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Battersby
- Mental Health Services, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SAHLN), Margaret Tobin Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.,Flinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), Discipline of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - Michael R Kidd
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.,Global Primary Care, Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - Julio Licinio
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
| | - Philip Aylward
- Division of Medicine, Cardiac and Critical Care Services, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Flinders Cardiac Clinic, Flinders Private Hospital, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Amanda Baker
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, NHMRC Senior Research Fellow, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Health Economics in the Institute for Choice, School of Business, University of South Australia, City West Campus (WL3-65), GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - Stephen Quinn
- Department of Statistics, Data Science and Epidemiology, Swinburne University of Technology, ATC-922, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - David J Castle
- St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and The University of Melbourne, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | - Sara Zabeen
- Flinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), Discipline of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - A Kate Fairweather-Schmidt
- Flinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), Discipline of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - Sharon Lawn
- Flinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), Discipline of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|