Medication-taking behaviour in New South Wales patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational study

Initiating or switching to insulin degludec/insulin aspart in a real-world population of adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia: results from a prospective, non-interventional study

BACKGROUND

Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a fixed-ratio co-formulation of insulin degludec and insulin aspart for the treatment of people with diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control. Few real-world studies of IDegAsp treatment have been conducted. Here, we report results from the Australian cohort of the global ARISE study of real-world IDegAsp use.

AIMS

To investigate glycaemic control and other clinical outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with IDegAsp in a real-world setting in Australia.

METHODS

A total of 183 adults with T2D initiating or switching to IDegAsp in the Australian cohort of the open-label, non-interventional ARISE study were followed for 26-36 weeks from August 2019 to December 2020.

RESULTS

IDegAsp was associated with significant reductions from baseline to end of study (EOS) in mean glycated haemoglobin (estimated change -0.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.05 to -0.56; P < 0.0001)), fasting plasma glucose (-1.6 mmol/L (95% CI: -2.49 to -0.63; P = 0.0017)) and body weight (-2.6 kg (95% CI: -3.68 to -1.55; P < 0.0001)). In insulin-experienced patients, the mean total daily insulin dose did not change significantly (estimated change from baseline to EOS 3.8 (95% CI: -3.70 to 11.21; P = 0.3202)). The proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia numerically decreased during the study (non-severe: 14.2-10.9%; nocturnal non-severe: 4.9-2.2%; and severe: 2.2-0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating or switching to IDegAsp in a real-world population of people with T2D in Australia was associated with significant improvements in glycaemic control and body weight, and numerically lower levels of hypoglycaemia compared with baseline.

Factors associated with adherence or nonadherence to insulin therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

One of the greatest barriers to the treatment of T2DM is nonadherence which particularly applies to insulin therapy. There is a need for a comprehensive overview of all factors associated with nonadherence to insulin therapy. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with adherence or nonadherence to insulin therapy among adults with T2DM.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cinahl, and Web of Science (January 2013 to March 2023).

RESULTS

A final sample of 48 studies was included in the scoping review. The synthesis revealed 30 factors associated with adherence or nonadherence. The factors were grouped into 6 themes: demographics, attitude and perceptions, management of diabetes, impact on daily living, disease and medication, and healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

The most prominent factors identified were age, cost of healthcare, personal beliefs towards insulin therapy, social stigma, patient education, complexity of diabetes treatment, impact of insulin therapy on daily life, and fear of side effects. The results indicate a need for further research to determine threshold values for the factors associated with adherence or nonadherence.

Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Australia: a discrete choice experiment

Background

Australia has a high proportion of migrants, with an increasing migration rate from India. Type 2 diabetes is a chronic condition common amongst the Indian population. The decision to initiate and continue medication therapy (conventional or ayurvedic medicine) is complex and is influenced by a wide range of factors.

Objective

To determine preferences for conventional vs. ayurvedic medicines in Indian migrants with diabetes, and to identify the factors that may influence their preferences.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment was conducted with participants in Australia who were migrants from India with type 2 diabetes (n=141). Each respondent evaluated eight choice tasks consisting of eight attributes describing medicines and outcomes of medication taking; and were asked to choose 'conventional', or 'ayurvedic' medicine. A mixed multinomial logit model was used to estimate preferences.

Results

Overall, respondents' preference to initiate a medicine was negative for both conventional (β=-2.33164, p<0.001) and ayurvedic medicines (β=-3.12181, p<0.001); however, significant heterogenicity was noted in participants' preferences (SD: 2.33122, p<0.001). Six significant attributes were identified to influence preferences. In decreasing rank order: occurrence of hypoglycaemic events (relative importance, RI=24.33%), weight change (RI=20.00%), effectiveness of medicine (RI=17.91%), instructions to take with food (RI=17.05%), side effects (RI=13.20%) and formulation (RI=7.49%). Respondents preferred to initiate a medicine despite potential side effects.

Conclusions

There was a greater preference for conventional medicine, though neither were preferred. Medicine attributes and medication-taking outcomes influenced people's preferences for an antidiabetic medicine. It is important to identify individual preferences during healthcare consultations to ensure optimal medication-taking.

A Qualitative Study on Medication Taking Behaviour Among People With Diabetes in Australia

Background: Australia has a high proportion of migrants with an increasing migration rate from India. Type II diabetes is a long-term condition common amongst the Indian population.

Aims: To investigate patients’ medication-taking behaviour and factors that influence adherence at the three phases of adherence.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 23 Indian migrants living in Sydney. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

Results: 1) Initiation: The majority of participants were initially prescribed oral antidiabetic medicine and only two were started on insulin. Most started taking their medicine immediately while some delayed initiating therapy due to fear of side-effects. 2) Implementation: Most participants reported taking their medicine as prescribed. However, some reported forgetting their medicine especially when they were in a hurry for work or were out for social events. 3) Discontinuation: A few participants discontinued taking their medicine. Those who discontinued did so to try Ayurvedic medicine. Their trial continued for a few weeks to a few years. Those who did not receive expected results from the Ayurvedic medicine restarted their prescribed conventional medicine.

Conclusion: A range of medication-taking behaviours were observed, ranging from delays in initiation to long-term discontinuation, and swapping of prescribed medicine with Ayurvedic medicine. This study highlights the need for tailored interventions, including education, that focus on factors that impact medication adherence from initiation to discontinuation of therapy.

Psychosocial Determinants of Treatment Adherence in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes - A Review

Less than 50% of patients with diabetes achieve the glycaemic goals recommended by the American Diabetes Association. The set of factors associated with adherence to treatment is very broad. Evidence suggests that psychosocial factors are related to medication adherence of patients with type 2 diabetes. Due to the lack of a clear statement from researchers regarding the relationship of psychosocial factors to adherence, an electronic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate, CINAHL Complete, Edition and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition using the following keywords "adherence", "diabetes", "social support", "stress", "anxiety and depression", "beliefs about medicine", "communication", "older age", "frailty", "cognitive impairment", "addiction", "acceptance of illness", "sense of coherence" obtaining 2758 results. After a narrowing of searches and reference scanning, 36 studies were qualified. The studies analysed showed negative effects of anxiety, diabetes distress, older age, poor communication with physicians, stress, concerns about medicines and cognitive impairment on levels of self-care and medication adherence. One study did not confirm the association of depression with adherence. Self-efficacy, social and family support, and acceptance of illness had a beneficial effect on medication adherence. In conclusion, the current evidence suggests that the relationship between psychosocial factors and adherence has reliable scientific support.

Performance-based pharmacy payment models: the case for change

In response to rising healthcare costs, healthcare payers across the globe have been experimenting with performance-based payment models that link payments to providers with the quality of care that they provide. Community pharmacy in Australia has yet to be significantly affected by these changes. Initial steps have been taken to fund quality-linked interventions by pharmacists, such as the provision of medicines in dose administration aids, but funding for dispensing prescriptions remains solely based on a fee-for-service model. At the foundation of any performance-based payment model are measures that, in aggregate, reflect the quality of care that is provided. Patient adherence to prescription regimens can be correlated with the counselling provided by pharmacists and, as such, can serve as the measure on which a performance-based payment model for dispensing can be constructed. Experience in the US suggests per-prescription payments to a pharmacy can be increased or decreased by a small, yet meaningful, amount based on a measure of the level of adherence of patients of the pharmacy. The current dispensing payment model in the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme may be able to be modified in a similar manner to support provision by pharmacists of improved quality of care.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Type 2 Diabetes and Their Role in Primary Care: An Australian Perspective

The ever-increasing number of drugs available to treat type 2 diabetes and the complexity of patients with this condition present a constant challenge when it comes to identifying the most appropriate treatment approach. The more recent glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are non-insulin injectable options for the management of type 2 diabetes. Effective at improving glycaemic control with a low intrinsic risk of hypoglycaemia and the potential for weight reduction, this agent class is an important addition to the prescribing armamentarium. However, understanding their place in therapy may prove confusing for many primary care practitioners, especially given the common belief that 'injectables' are a last-resort treatment option, which puts them at risk of being niched alongside insulin. This review summarises the clinical evidence for GLP-1RAs and how they compare to other glucose-lowering agents in managing type 2 diabetes. It also provides practical and case-driven opinions and recommendations on the optimal use of GLP-1RAs by discussing important patient factors and clinical considerations that will help to identify those who are most likely to benefit from this class of agents.Funding: Eli Lilly Australia.

Factors Associated With Medication Engagement Among Older Adults With Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the factors associated with medication engagement among older adults (≥60 years) with diabetes.

Methods

Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Scopus) were systematically searched to identify studies examining the association between factors and medication engagement among older diabetes patients. A study met inclusion for meta-analysis if the prevalence of medication engagement or factor was reported in ≥2 studies and the frequency or strength of association was either reported or able to be computed. Quality appraisal was performed with the Downs and Black tool.

Results

Of 538 retrieved studies, 33 (20 cohort and 13 cross-sectional) were included for systematic review; of these, 22 met criteria for meta-analysis. Findings from meta-analysis show that women (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97), those with depression (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.87), and those with higher out-of-pocket spending for prescription drugs (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94) were less likely to take diabetes medication when compared with men, those without depression, and those with lower out-of-pocket costs, respectively. Older age (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.27) was associated with better engagement to diabetes medication.

Conclusions

Of 4 identified factors, 2 are modifiable. Recent policy efforts to decrease the cost burden of prescribed medication for older adults, such as Medicare Part D, may remove this barrier to medication engagement. Routine screening for depression among older adults with diabetes should be included as part of usual care to facilitate an integrated treatment approach.

Supporting self-management of type 2 diabetes: is there a role for the community pharmacist?

BACKGROUND

Evidence supports the efficacy of pharmacy services in type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, little is known about consumer perspectives on the role of community pharmacists in diabetes care. The objectives of this study were to identify potential unmet needs and explore preferences for pharmacist-delivered support for T2D.

METHODS

A qualitative study using focus groups was conducted in Sydney, Australia. Patients with T2D who were members of the Australian Diabetes Council in Sydney, Australia, were recruited through a survey on medication use in T2D. Five focus groups with a total of 32 consumers with T2D were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

The key themes were 1) the experiences of diabetes services received, 2) the potential to deliver self-management services, and 3) the suggested role of pharmacist in supporting diabetes management. Gaps in understanding and some degree of nonadherence to self-management signaled a potential for self-management support delivered by pharmacists. However, consumers still perceive that the main role of pharmacists in diabetes care centers on drug management services, with some enhancements to support adherence and continuity of supply. Barriers to diabetes care services included time constraints and a perceived lack of interest by pharmacists.

CONCLUSION

Given the unmet needs in diabetes self-management, opportunities exist for pharmacists to be involved in diabetes care. The challenge is for pharmacists to upgrade their diabetes knowledge and skills, organize their workflow, and become proactive in delivering diabetes care support.