Stepped care for musculoskeletal pain is ineffective: a model for utilisation of specialist physiotherapists in primary healthcare management

Patient experiences of referral practices and primary care physiotherapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines recommend referral for patients with persistent LBP however discordance persists between recommended care and implementation in practice. Understanding patient experiences of referral practices and physiotherapy care could be important for optimizing LBP management in primary care settings.

PURPOSE

This study explored referral experiences of people with nonspecific LBP in Australian primary care and their knowledge and experience of physiotherapy.

METHODS

An interpretive descriptive qualitative framework was used with 17 participants interviewed from community-based physiotherapy practices.

RESULTS

Four themes described the participants' experiences of referrals in primary care settings: 1) Referral practices ranged from formal to informal to non-existent; 2) Fragmented inter-and intra-professional LBP care management; 3) Patient perceived differences in the roles of physiotherapists and specialist physiotherapists; and 4) Patient nominated barriers and facilitators to optimal referral practices.

CONCLUSION

Physiotherapists support people with LBP to improve strength and function, whereas the specialist physiotherapist's role was seen as more holistic. Referral pathways that align to clinical guideline recommendations for non-surgical management and treatment remain underdeveloped. Improved referral pathways to clinicians such as physiotherapists with additional credentialed skills and competence in musculoskeletal care could improve people's experiences of care and health outcomes.

Referral practices of recent graduate and experienced physiotherapists working in Australian primary care for people with musculoskeletal conditions

BACKGROUND

People with musculoskeletal conditions often seek care from physiotherapists. Some, particularly those at risk of poor outcomes, may benefit from referral to physiotherapists with expertise in managing musculoskeletal conditions and/or multidisciplinary care. Understanding referral practices of physiotherapists, and how experience influences those practices, may assist in implementing optimal care pathways in primary care.

AIMS

Explore (i) current referral practices of recent graduate and experienced physiotherapists who manage musculoskeletal conditions; (ii) opinions about referral to specialist physiotherapists for people at risk of poor outcomes.

METHODS

This qualitative study consisted of 23 semi-structured interviews with recent graduate (n = 9) and experienced physiotherapists (n = 14) working in primary care. Perspectives of participants' current referral practices (to whom, when and why they are referred) and referral to specialist physiotherapists were sought. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim prior to analysis.

RESULTS

Referral practices for both groups were influenced by specific diagnoses, complexity of presentations, confidence, self-awareness, the clinical environment and system-related factors. Experienced physiotherapists were more confident and specific in their referrals and had established trusted networks compared with new graduates. Early referral to specialist physiotherapists was more likely when therapists were co-located. Barriers to early referral were lack of awareness, health system factors and impact on the patient (e.g., financial, time, continuity of care).

CONCLUSION

Understanding factors influencing referral decisions may improve both intra- and interprofessional care for people with musculoskeletal conditions. Referral of people at risk of poor outcomes to specialist physiotherapists may be improved by greater intraprofessional awareness and clarity of roles.

Biopsychosocial sequelae of chronically painful injuries sustained in motor vehicle accidents contributing to non-recovery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Claimants with chronically painful injuries sustained in motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) undergo assessment and management influenced by insurance and medico-legal processes defined by a biomedical paradigm which is discordant with best evidence. We aim to demonstrate the impact of biopsychosocial factors on post-MVA sequelae which contribute to non-recovery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of medico-legal documents and reports on 300 consecutive claimants referred to a pain medicine physician over 7 years (2012-2018) for assessment of painful musculoskeletal injuries post-MVA. One hundred data items were extracted from the medico-legal documents and reports for each claimant and entered into an electronic database. Post-MVA sequelae were analysed using chi-square analysis (OR >2) for significant associations with demographic, pre-MVA and post-MVA variables. Factors with significant associations were entered into a logistic regression model to determine significant statistical predictors of post-MVA sequelae contributing to non-recovery.

RESULTS

The claimants were aged 17 to 80 years (mean age 42 years), and approximately half (53%, n=159) were female. The time from MVA to interview averaged 2.5 years. Widespread pain was present in 18% (n=54), and widespread somatosensory signs implying central sensitisation (OR=9.85, p<.001) was the most significant multivariate association. Long-term opiate use post-MVA (32%) was predicted by pre-MVA sleep disturbance (OR=5.08, p=.001), post-MVA major depressive disorder (MDD) (OR=3.02, p=.003) and long-term unemployment (OR=2.22. p=.007). Approximately half (47%, n=142) required post-MVA support from a psychologist or psychiatrist. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was diagnosed by a psychiatrist or psychologist in 20% (n=59), yet early identification of risk of PTSD was rare. Pre-MVA, 89.4% (n=268) were studying or employed. Permanent unemployability post-MVA occurred in 35% (n=104) and was predicted by MDD (OR=3.59, p=.001) and antidepressant use (OR=2.17, p=.005). Major social change post-MVA (70%) was predicted by older age (OR=.966, p=.003), depressive symptoms (OR=3.71, p<.001) and opiate use (OR=2.00, p=.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Biomedical factors, including older age, impaired sleep and indicators of widespread central sensitisation, and psychological factors, including stress, anxiety and depression, were the most prominent multivariate associations as statistical predictors of major adverse sequelae contributing to non-recovery for claimants with chronic pain post-MVA.