Young Australians' receptiveness to discussing sexual health with a general practitioner

Moving Toward Online-Based Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment Services for Young People: Who Will Use It and What Do They Want?

BACKGROUND

The market for online sexually transmitted infection (STI) services is rapidly expanding. Online health services often have unequal uptake among different demographics of the population. There is a need to understand how different online delivery options for STI testing may appeal to different groups of young people, particularly young people who have higher rates of STI diagnoses.

METHODS

An online survey of young Australians aged 16 to 29 years was conducted to understand service preferences regarding consultation (telehealth, fully automated questionnaire), testing (electronic pathology form, at-home self-sampling), and treatment (e-prescriptions, mailed oral tablets). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression examined associations between user characteristics and service preferences, and adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented.

RESULTS

Among 905 respondents, rural youth were more likely to prefer fully automated questionnaires (aRRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.5) over telehealth consultations, whereas culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) youth were less likely (aRRR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7). Rural youth preferred at-home self-sampling kits (aRRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7) over electronic forms for on-site collection at pathology centers, with the opposite for CALD youth (aRRR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1.0). Receiving oral antibiotics by mail was preferred by rural youth (aRRR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.6) over for in-clinic treatment, but not for CALD youth (aRRR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that rural youth tend to prefer self-navigated and automated options, whereas CALD prefer options with greater provider engagement. Online STI service providers should consider how different service options may affect equitable uptake across the population and implications for addressing disparities in testing and treatment.

STI pathogens in the oropharynx: update on screening and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The rise in antimicrobial resistance in several STI pathogens such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae has become a public health threat as only one first-line treatment remains. Reducing screening interval for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in high-prevalence populations has been proposed to address antimicrobial stewardship, but this remains controversial. This review aimed to revisit the epidemiology of infections at the oropharynx and review the current screening recommendations and treatment guidelines in different populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging evidence suggests that the oropharynx is the primary anatomical site for gonorrhoea transmission but maybe not for chlamydia transmission. Most international guidelines recommend 3-monthly oropharyngeal gonorrhoea and chlamydia screening for high-prevalence populations (e.g. men who have sex with men) but not low-prevalence populations (e.g. heterosexuals) given the clinical and public health benefits of screening in low-prevalence populations are still unclear. Doxycycline remains the first-line treatment for oropharyngeal chlamydia in most guidelines. However, some countries have moved from dual therapy (ceftriaxone and azithromycin) to monotherapy (ceftriaxone) for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment to address antimicrobial stewardship.

SUMMARY

The transmission of gonorrhoea and chlamydia is still not fully understood. Further work will be required to evaluate the benefits and harms of reducing screening in high-prevalence populations.