Treatment durability and virological response in treatment-experienced HIV-positive patients on an integrase inhibitor-based regimen: an Australian cohort study

Causes of HIV Treatment Interruption during the Last 20 Years: A Multi-Cohort Real-Life Study

In the last years, many antiretroviral drugs (ART) have been developed with increased efficacy. Nowadays, the main reasons for treatment switches are adverse events, proactive strategy or simplification. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the reason for treatment interruption in the last 20 years. We merged data of eight cohorts of the SCOLTA project: lopinavir/r (LPV), atazanavir/r (ATV), darunavir/r or /c (DRV), rilpivirine (RPV), raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir/c (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG) and bictegravir (BIC). We included 4405 people with HIV (PWH). Overall, 664 (15.1%), 489 (11.1%), and 271 (6.2%) PWH interrupted the treatment in the first, second, and third years after starting a new ART. Looking at the interruption in the first year, the most frequent causes were adverse events (3.8%), loss to follow-up (3.7%), patients’ decisions (2.6%), treatment failure (1.7%), and simplification (1.3%). In the multivariate analysis regarding experienced patients, treatment with LPV, ATV, RPV or EVG/c, having less than 250 CD4 cells/mL, history of intravenous drug use, and HCV positivity were associated with an increased risk of interruption. In naive people, only LPV/r was associated with an increased risk of interruption, while RPV was associated with a lower risk. In conclusion, our data on more than 4400 PWH show that adverse events have represented the most frequent cause of treatment interruptions in the first year of ART (3.84%). Treatment discontinuations were more frequent during the first year of follow-up and decreased thereafter. First-generation PI in both naïve and experienced PWH, and EVG/c, in experienced PWH, were associated with a higher risk of treatment interruptions.

Integrase Inhibitor-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Among Women Living with HIV: Data from the OPERA Cohort

BACKGROUND

Women face unique complexities in HIV treatment yet are underrepresented in antiretroviral therapy (ART) studies.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis assessed the one-year durability of the first integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens prescribed to women in a large cohort of patients living with HIV in care.

METHODS

Women with HIV who initiated their first INSTI-containing regimen between 08/12/2013 and 11/30/2015 were identified in the OPERA cohort, a collaboration of 79 US outpatient clinics. Discontinuation within the first year of treatment with an INSTI was compared between dolutegravir (DTG), raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG), using multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan- Meier estimates. Virologic response and regimen modifications were described and compared across INSTIs.

RESULTS

A total of 537 treatment-naïve (DTG: 39%, EVG: 48%, RAL: 13%) and 878 treatmentexperienced (DTG: 57%, EVG: 29%, RAL: 13%) women were analyzed. In the first twelve months after initiation, women taking EVG or RAL were more likely to discontinue their initial INSTI than those taking DTG among both treatment-naïve (adjusted hazard ratio EVG vs. DTG: 1.59 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.39); RAL vs. DTG: 2.46 (1.49, 4.05)) and treatment-experienced women (EVG vs. DTG: 1.39 (1.02, 1.88); RAL vs. DTG: 2.17 (1.51, 3.12)). Following discontinuation of the initial INSTI, women commonly switched to a regimen containing a different drug from the INSTI class (treatment-naïve DTG: 34%, RAL: 33% EVG: 41%; treatment-experienced DTG: 23%, RAL: 19% EVG: 41%).

CONCLUSION

In treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced women living with HIV, women taking DTG had the lowest risk for early (≤1 year) discontinuation.

The treatment outcomes of antiretroviral substitutions in routine clinical settings in Asia; data from the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD)

Introduction

Although substitutions of antiretroviral regimen are generally safe, most data on substitutions are based on results from clinical trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of substituting antiretroviral regimen in virologically suppressed HIV‐infected patients in non‐clinical trial settings in Asian countries.

Methods

The study population consisted of HIV‐infected patients enrolled in the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD). Individuals were included in this analysis if they started combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) after 2002, were being treated at a centre that documented a median rate of viral load monitoring ≥0.8 tests/patient/year among TAHOD enrolees, and experienced a minor or major treatment substitution while on virally suppressive cART. The primary endpoint to evaluate outcomes was clinical or virological failure (VF), followed by an ART class change. Clinical failure was defined as death or an AIDS diagnosis. VF was defined as confirmed viral load measurements ≥400 copies/mL followed by an ART class change within six months. Minor regimen substitutions were defined as within‐class changes and major regimen substitutions were defined as changes to a drug class. The patterns of substitutions and rate of clinical or VF after substitutions were analyzed.

Results

Of 3994 adults who started ART after 2002, 3119 (78.1%) had at least one period of virological suppression. Among these, 1170 (37.5%) underwent a minor regimen substitution, and 296 (9.5%) underwent a major regimen substitution during suppression. The rates of clinical or VF were 1.48/100 person years (95% CI 1.14 to 1.91) in the minor substitution group, 2.85/100 person years (95% CI 1.88 to 4.33) in the major substitution group and 2.53/100 person years (95% CI 2.20 to 2.92) among patients that did not undergo a treatment substitution.

Conclusions

The rate of clinical or VF was low in both major and minor substitution groups, showing that regimen substitution is generally effective in non‐clinical trial settings in Asian countries.