The T4-encoded cochaperonin, gp31, has unique properties that explain its requirement for the folding of the T4 major capsid protein

Chaperonin-assisted protein folding: a chronologue

This chronologue seeks to document the discovery and development of an understanding of oligomeric ring protein assemblies known as chaperonins that assist protein folding in the cell. It provides detail regarding genetic, physiologic, biochemical, and biophysical studies of these ATP-utilizing machines from both in vivo and in vitro observations. The chronologue is organized into various topics of physiology and mechanism, for each of which a chronologic order is generally followed. The text is liberally illustrated to provide firsthand inspection of the key pieces of experimental data that propelled this field. Because of the length and depth of this piece, the use of the outline as a guide for selected reading is encouraged, but it should also be of help in pursuing the text in direct order.

Functional divergence of chloroplast Cpn60α subunits during Arabidopsis embryo development

Chaperonins are a class of molecular chaperones that assist in the folding and assembly of a wide range of substrates. In plants, chloroplast chaperonins are composed of two different types of subunits, Cpn60α and Cpn60β, and duplication of Cpn60α and Cpn60β genes occurs in a high proportion of plants. However, the importance of multiple Cpn60α and Cpn60β genes in plants is poorly understood. In this study, we found that loss-of-function of CPNA2 (AtCpn60α2), a gene encoding the minor Cpn60α subunit in Arabidopsis thaliana, resulted in arrested embryo development at the globular stage, whereas the other AtCpn60α gene encoding the dominant Cpn60α subunit, CPNA1 (AtCpn60α1), mainly affected embryonic cotyledon development at the torpedo stage and thereafter. Further studies demonstrated that CPNA2 can form a functional chaperonin with CPNB2 (AtCpn60β2) and CPNB3 (AtCpn60β3), while the functional partners of CPNA1 are CPNB1 (AtCpn60β1) and CPNB2. We also revealed that the functional chaperonin containing CPNA2 could assist the folding of a specific substrate, KASI (β-ketoacyl-[acyl carrier protein] synthase I), and that the KASI protein level was remarkably reduced due to loss-of-function of CPNA2. Furthermore, the reduction in the KASI protein level was shown to be the possible cause for the arrest of cpna2 embryos. Our findings indicate that the two Cpn60α subunits in Arabidopsis play different roles during embryo development through forming distinct chaperonins with specific AtCpn60β to assist the folding of particular substrates, thus providing novel insights into functional divergence of Cpn60α subunits in plants.

Chaperonins are large oligomeric complexes that are involved in the folding and assembly of numerous proteins in various species. In contrast to other types of chaperonins, chloroplast chaperonins are characterized by the hetero-oligomeric structure composed of two unique types of subunits, Cpn60α and Cpn60β, each of which is present in two or more paralogous forms in most of higher plants. However, the functional significance underlying the wide array of subunit types and complex oligomeric arrangement remains largely unknown. Here, we investigated the role of the minor Cpn60α subunit AtCpn60α2 in Arabidopsis embryo development, and found that AtCpn60α2 is important for the transition of globular embryos to heart-shaped embryos, whereas loss of the dominant Cpn60α subunit AtCpn60α1 affects embryonic cotyledon development. Further studies demonstrated that AtCpn60α2 could form functional chaperonins with AtCpn60β2 and AtCpn60β3 to specifically assist in folding of the substrate KASI, which is important for the formation of heart-shaped embryos. Our results suggest that duplication of Cpn60α genes in higher plants can increase the potential number of chloroplast chaperonin substrates and provide chloroplast chaperonins with more roles in plant growth and development, thus revealing the relationship between duplication and functional specialization of chaperonin genes.

Novel chaperonins are prevalent in the virioplankton and demonstrate links to viral biology and ecology

Chaperonins are protein-folding machinery found in all cellular life. Chaperonin genes have been documented within a few viruses, yet, surprisingly, analysis of metagenome sequence data indicated that chaperonin-carrying viruses are common and geographically widespread in marine ecosystems. Also unexpected was the discovery of viral chaperonin sequences related to thermosome proteins of archaea, indicating the presence of virioplankton populations infecting marine archaeal hosts. Virioplankton large subunit chaperonin sequences (GroELs) were divergent from bacterial sequences, indicating that viruses have carried this gene over long evolutionary time. Analysis of viral metagenome contigs indicated that: the order of large and small subunit genes was linked to the phylogeny of GroEL; both lytic and temperate phages may carry group I chaperonin genes; and viruses carrying a GroEL gene likely have large double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genomes (>70 kb). Given these connections, it is likely that chaperonins are critical to the biology and ecology of virioplankton populations that carry these genes. Moreover, these discoveries raise the intriguing possibility that viral chaperonins may more broadly alter the structure and function of viral and cellular proteins in infected host cells.

PAB is an assembly chaperone that functions downstream of chaperonin 60 in the assembly of chloroplast ATP synthase coupling factor 1

The chloroplast ATP synthase, a multisubunit complex in the thylakoid membrane, catalyzes the light-driven synthesis of ATP, thereby supplying the energy for carbon fixation during photosynthesis. The chloroplast ATP synthase is composed of both nucleus- and chloroplast-encoded proteins that have required the evolution of novel mechanisms to coordinate the biosynthesis and assembly of chloroplast ATP synthase subunits temporally and spatially. Here we have elucidated the assembly mechanism of the α3β3γ core complex of the chloroplast ATP synthase by identification and functional characterization of a key assembly factor, PAB (protein in chloroplast atpase biogenesis). PAB directly interacts with the nucleus-encoded γ subunit and functions downstream of chaperonin 60 (Cpn60)-mediated CF1γ subunit folding to promote its assembly into the catalytic core. PAB does not have any recognizable motifs or domains but is conserved in photosynthetic eukaryotes. It is likely that PAB evolved together with the transfer of chloroplast genes into the nucleus to assist nucleus-encoded CF1γ assembly into the CF1 core. Such coordination might represent an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for folding and assembly of nucleus-encoded proteins to ensure proper assembly of multiprotein photosynthetic complexes.

Expression and functional characterization of the first bacteriophage-encoded chaperonin

Chaperonins promote protein folding in vivo and are ubiquitously found in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. The first viral chaperonin GroEL ortholog, gene product 146 (gp146), whose gene was earlier identified in the genome of bacteriophage EL, has been shown to be synthesized during phage propagation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells. The recombinant gp146 has been expressed in Escherichia coli and characterized by different physicochemical methods for the first time. Using serum against the recombinant protein, gp146's native substrate, the phage endolysin gp188, has been immunoprecipitated from the lysate of EL-infected bacteria and identified by mass spectrometry. In vitro experiments have shown that gp146 has a protective effect against endolysin thermal inactivation and aggregation, providing evidence of its chaperonin function. The phage chaperonin has been found to have the architecture and some properties similar to those of GroEL but not to require cochaperonin for its functional activity.

Structure, assembly, and DNA packaging of the bacteriophage T4 head

The bacteriophage T4 head is an elongated icosahedron packed with 172 kb of linear double-stranded DNA and numerous proteins. The capsid is built from three essential proteins: gp23*, which forms the hexagonal capsid lattice; gp24*, which forms pentamers at 11 of the 12 vertices; and gp20, which forms the unique dodecameric portal vertex through which DNA enters during packaging and exits during infection. Intensive work over more than half a century has led to a deep understanding of the phage T4 head. The atomic structure of gp24 has been determined. A structural model built for gp23 using its similarity to gp24 showed that the phage T4 major capsid protein has the same fold as numerous other icosahedral bacteriophages. However, phage T4 displays an unusual membrane and portal initiated assembly of a shape determining self-sufficient scaffolding core. Folding of gp23 requires the assistance of two chaperones, the Escherichia coli chaperone GroEL acting with the phage-coded gp23-specific cochaperone, gp31. The capsid also contains two nonessential outer capsid proteins, Hoc and Soc, which decorate the capsid surface. Through binding to adjacent gp23 subunits, Soc reinforces the capsid structure. Hoc and Soc have been used extensively in bipartite peptide display libraries and to display pathogen antigens, including those from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Neisseria meningitides, Bacillus anthracis, and foot and mouth disease virus. The structure of Ip1*, one of a number of multiple (>100) copy proteins packed and injected with DNA from the full head, shows it to be an inhibitor of one specific restriction endonuclease specifically targeting glycosylated hydroxymethyl cytosine DNA. Extensive mutagenesis, combined with atomic structures of the DNA packaging/terminase proteins gp16 and gp17, elucidated the ATPase and nuclease functional motifs involved in DNA translocation and headful DNA cutting. The cryoelectron microscopy structure of the T4 packaging machine showed a pentameric motor assembled with gp17 subunits on the portal vertex. Single molecule optical tweezers and fluorescence studies showed that the T4 motor packages DNA at the highest rate known and can package multiple segments. Förster resonance energy transfer-fluorescence correlation spectroscopy studies indicate that DNA gets compressed in the stalled motor and that the terminase-to-portal distance changes during translocation. Current evidence suggests a linear two-component (large terminase plus portal) translocation motor in which electrostatic forces generated by ATP hydrolysis drive DNA translocation by alternating the motor between tensed and relaxed states.

Structure and assembly of bacteriophage T4 head

The bacteriophage T4 capsid is an elongated icosahedron, 120 nm long and 86 nm wide, and is built with three essential proteins; gp23*, which forms the hexagonal capsid lattice, gp24*, which forms pentamers at eleven of the twelve vertices, and gp20, which forms the unique dodecameric portal vertex through which DNA enters during packaging and exits during infection. The past twenty years of research has greatly elevated the understanding of phage T4 head assembly and DNA packaging. The atomic structure of gp24 has been determined. A structural model built for gp23 using its similarity to gp24 showed that the phage T4 major capsid protein has the same fold as that found in phage HK97 and several other icosahedral bacteriophages. Folding of gp23 requires the assistance of two chaperones, the E. coli chaperone GroEL and the phage coded gp23-specific chaperone, gp31. The capsid also contains two non-essential outer capsid proteins, Hoc and Soc, which decorate the capsid surface. The structure of Soc shows two capsid binding sites which, through binding to adjacent gp23 subunits, reinforce the capsid structure. Hoc and Soc have been extensively used in bipartite peptide display libraries and to display pathogen antigens including those from HIV, Neisseria meningitides, Bacillus anthracis, and FMDV. The structure of Ip1*, one of the components of the core, has been determined, which provided insights on how IPs protect T4 genome against the E. coli nucleases that degrade hydroxymethylated and glycosylated T4 DNA. Extensive mutagenesis combined with the atomic structures of the DNA packaging/terminase proteins gp16 and gp17 elucidated the ATPase and nuclease functional motifs involved in DNA translocation and headful DNA cutting. Cryo-EM structure of the T4 packaging machine showed a pentameric motor assembled with gp17 subunits on the portal vertex. Single molecule optical tweezers and fluorescence studies showed that the T4 motor packages DNA at a rate of up to 2000 bp/sec, the fastest reported to date of any packaging motor. FRET-FCS studies indicate that the DNA gets compressed during the translocation process. The current evidence suggests a mechanism in which electrostatic forces generated by ATP hydrolysis drive the DNA translocation by alternating the motor between tensed and relaxed states.

Current limitations in native mass spectrometry based structural biology

Nowadays, mass spectrometry plays an important role in structural biology. At one end it can be used to investigate intact protein complexes, providing details about the complex composition, topology, stability, and dynamics, whereas at the other end the protein's identity and possible modifications can be visualized using proteomics approaches. Combining all this information allows the generation of detailed models for functional biological assemblies. Here, a perspective on the application of native mass spectrometry in structural biology is presented. The potential of this technique and some important current limitations are discussed. This includes issues regarding the quality/homogeneity of the sample, the dissociation efficiency of protein complexes during tandem mass spectrometric analysis, and some boundaries of ion mobility mass spectrometry.

Dissociation kinetics of the GroEL-gp31 chaperonin complex studied with Förster resonance energy transfer

Propagation of bacteriophage T4 in its host Escherichia coli involves the folding of the major capsid protein gp23, which is facilitated by a hybrid chaperone complex consisting of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL and the phage-encoded co-chaperonin, gp31. It has been well established that the GroEL-gp31 complex is capable of folding gp23 whereas the homologous GroEL-GroES complex cannot perform this function. To assess whether this is a consequence of differences in the interactions of the proteins within the chaperonin complex, we have investigated the dissociation kinetics of GroEL-gp31 and GroEL-GroES complexes using Forster resonance energy transfer. Here we report that the dissociation of gp31 from GroEL is slightly faster than that of GroES from GroEL and is further accelerated by the binding of gp23. In contrast to what had been observed previously, we found that gp23 is able to interact with the GroEL-GroES complex, which might explain how bacteriophage T4 redirects the folding machinery of Escherichia coli during morphogenesis.

The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti-aggregation device

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin folding chamber is an encapsulated space of approximately 65 A diameter with a hydrophilic wall, inside of which many cellular proteins reach the native state. The question of whether the cavity wall actively directs folding reactions or is playing a passive role has been open. We review past and recent observations and conclude that the chamber functions as a passive "Anfinsen cage" that prevents folding monomers from multimolecular aggregation.

Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber

A subset of essential cellular proteins requires the assistance of chaperonins (in Escherichia coli, GroEL and GroES), double-ring complexes in which the two rings act alternately to bind, encapsulate and fold a wide range of nascent or stress-denatured proteins. This process starts by the trapping of a substrate protein on hydrophobic surfaces in the central cavity of a GroEL ring. Then, binding of ATP and co-chaperonin GroES to that ring ejects the non-native protein from its binding sites, through forced unfolding or other major conformational changes, and encloses it in a hydrophilic chamber for folding. ATP hydrolysis and subsequent ATP binding to the opposite ring trigger dissociation of the chamber and release of the substrate protein. The bacteriophage T4 requires its own version of GroES, gp31, which forms a taller folding chamber, to fold the major viral capsid protein gp23 (refs 16-20). Polypeptides are known to fold inside the chaperonin complex, but the conformation of an encapsulated protein has not previously been visualized. Here we present structures of gp23-chaperonin complexes, showing both the initial captured state and the final, close-to-native state with gp23 encapsulated in the folding chamber. Although the chamber is expanded, it is still barely large enough to contain the elongated gp23 monomer, explaining why the GroEL-GroES complex is not able to fold gp23 and showing how the chaperonin structure distorts to enclose a large, physiological substrate protein.

Thermal activation of the co-chaperonins GroES and gp31 probed by mass spectrometry

Many biological active proteins are assembled in protein complexes. Understanding the (dis)assembly of such complexes is therefore of major interest. Here we use mass spectrometry to monitor the disassembly induced by thermal activation of the heptameric co-chaperonins GroES and gp31. We use native electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) on a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometer to monitor the stoichiometry of the chaperonins. A thermally controlled electrospray setup was employed to analyze conformational and stoichiometric changes of the chaperonins at varying temperature. The native ESI-MS data agreed well with data obtained from fluorescence spectroscopy as the measured thermal dissociation temperatures of the complexes were in good agreement. Furthermore, we observed that thermal denaturing of GroES and gp31 proceeds via intermediate steps of all oligomeric forms, with no evidence of a transiently stable unfolded heptamer. We also evaluated the thermal dissociation of the chaperonins in the gas phase using infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD) for thermal activation. Using gas-phase activation the smaller (2-4) oligomers were not detected, only down to the pentamer, whereafter the complex seemed to dissociate completely. These results demonstrate clearly that conformational changes of GroES and gp31 due to heating in solution and in the gas phase are significantly different.

A histidine-rich and cysteine-rich metal-binding domain at the C terminus of heat shock protein A from Helicobacter pylori: implication for nickel homeostasis and bismuth susceptibility

HspA, a member of the GroES chaperonin family, is a small protein found in Helicobacter pylori with a unique histidine- and cysteine-rich domain at the C terminus. In this work, we overexpressed, purified, and characterized this protein both in vitro and in vivo. The apo form of the protein binds 2.10 +/- 0.07 Ni(2+) or 1.98 +/- 0.08 Bi(3+) ions/monomer with a dissociation constant (K(d)) of 1.1 or 5.9 x 10(-19) microm, respectively. Importantly, Ni(2+) can reversibly bind to the protein, as the bound nickel can be released either in the presence of a chelating ligand, e.g. EDTA, or at an acidic pH (pH((1/2)) 3.8 +/- 0.2). In contrast, Bi(3+) binds almost irreversibly to the protein. Both gel filtration chromatography and native electrophoresis demonstrated that apo-HspA exists as a heptamer in solution. Unexpectedly, binding of Bi(3+) to the protein altered its quaternary structure from a heptamer to a dimer, indicating that bismuth may interfere with the biological functions of HspA. When cultured in Ni(2+)-supplemented M9 minimal medium, Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells expressing wild-type HspA or the C-terminal deletion mutant clearly indicated that the C terminus might protect cells from high concentrations of external Ni(2+). However, an opposite phenomenon was observed when the same E. coli hosts were grown in Bi(3+)-supplemented medium. HspA may therefore play a dual role: to facilitate nickel acquisition by donating Ni(2+) to appropriate proteins in a nickel-deficient environment and to carry out detoxification via sequestration of excess nickel. Meanwhile, HspA can be a potential target of the bismuth antiulcer drug against H. pylori.

Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism

Chaperonins are large ring assemblies that assist protein folding to the native state by binding nonnative proteins in their central cavities and then, upon binding ATP, release the substrate protein into a now-encapsulated cavity to fold productively. Two families of such components have been identified: type I in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and the bacterial cytosol, which rely on a detachable "lid" structure for encapsulation, and type II in archaea and the eukaryotic cytosol, which contain a built-in protrusion structure. We discuss here a number of issues under current study. What is the range of substrates acted on by the two classes of chaperonin, in particular by GroEL in the bacterial cytoplasm and CCT in the eukaryotic cytosol, and are all these substrates subject to encapsulation? What are the determinants for substrate binding by the type II chaperonins? And is the encapsulated chaperonin cavity a passive container that prevents aggregation, or could it be playing an active role in polypeptide folding?

Tandem mass spectrometry of intact GroEL-substrate complexes reveals substrate-specific conformational changes in the trans ring

It has been suggested that the bacterial GroEL chaperonin accommodates only one substrate at any given time, due to conformational changes to both the cis and trans ring that are induced upon substrate binding. Using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, we show that indeed GroEL binds only one molecule of the model substrate Rubisco. In contrast, the capsid protein of bacteriophage T4, a natural GroEL substrate, can occupy both rings simultaneously. As these substrates are of similar size, the data indicate that each substrate induces distinct conformational changes in the GroEL chaperonin. The distinctive binding behavior of Rubisco and the capsid protein was further investigated using tandem mass spectrometry on the intact 800-914 kDa GroEL-substrate complexes. Our data suggest that even in the gas phase the substrates remain bound inside the GroEL cavity. The analysis revealed further that binding of Rubisco to the GroEL oligomer stabilizes the chaperonin complex significantly, whereas binding of one capsid protein did not have the same effect. However, addition of a second capsid protein molecule to GroEL resulted in a similar stabilizing effect to that obtained after the binding of a single Rubisco. On the basis of the stoichiometry of the GroEL chaperonin-substrate complex and the dissociation behavior of the two different substrates, we hypothesize that the binding of a single capsid polypeptide does not induce significant conformational changes in the GroEL trans ring, and hence the unoccupied GroEL ring remains accessible for a second capsid molecule.

The African swine fever virus nonstructural protein pB602L is required for formation of the icosahedral capsid of the virus particle

African swine fever virus (ASFV) protein pB602L has been described as a molecular chaperone for the correct folding of the major capsid protein p72. We have studied the function of protein pB602L during the viral assembly process by using a recombinant ASFV, vB602Li, which inducibly expresses the gene coding for this protein. We show that protein pB602L is a late nonstructural protein, which, in contrast with protein p72, is excluded from the viral factory. Repression of protein pB602L synthesis inhibits the proteolytic processing of the two viral polyproteins pp220 and pp62 and leads to a decrease in the levels of protein p72 and a delocalization of the capsid protein pE120R. As shown by electron microscopy analysis of cells infected with the recombinant virus vB602Li, the viral assembly process is severely altered in the absence of protein pB602L, with the generation of aberrant "zipper-like" structures instead of icosahedral virus particles. These "zipper-like" structures are similar to those found in cells infected under restrictive conditions with the recombinant virus vA72 inducibly expressing protein p72. Immunoelectron microscopy studies show that the abnormal forms generated in the absence of protein pB602L contain the inner envelope protein p17 and the two polyproteins but lack the capsid proteins p72 and pE120R. These findings indicate that protein pB602L is essential for the assembly of the icosahedral capsid of the virus particle.

Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein

GroEL and GroES form a chaperonin nano-cage for proteins up to approximately 60 kDa to fold in isolation. Here we explored the structural features of the chaperonin cage critical for rapid folding of encapsulated substrates. Modulating the volume of the GroEL central cavity affected folding speed in accordance with confinement theory. Small proteins (approximately 30 kDa) folded more rapidly as the size of the cage was gradually reduced to a point where restriction in space slowed folding dramatically. For larger proteins (approximately 40-50 kDa), either expanding or reducing cage volume decelerated folding. Additionally, interactions with the C-terminal, mildly hydrophobic Gly-Gly-Met repeat sequences of GroEL protruding into the cavity, and repulsion effects from the negatively charged cavity wall were required for rapid folding of some proteins. We suggest that by combining these features, the chaperonin cage provides a physical environment optimized to catalyze the structural annealing of proteins with kinetically complex folding pathways.

Multiple groESL operons are not key targets of RpoH1 and RpoH2 in Sinorhizobium meliloti

Among the rhizobia that establish nitrogen-fixing nodules on the roots of host plants, many contain multiple copies of genes encoding the sigma factor RpoH and the chaperone GroEL/GroES. In Sinorhizobium meliloti there are two rpoH genes, four groESL operons, and one groEL gene. rpoH1 mutants are defective for growth at high temperature and form ineffective nodules, rpoH1 rpoH2 double mutants are unable to form nodules, and groESL1 mutants form ineffective nodules. To explore the roles of RpoH1 and RpoH2, we identified mutants that suppress both the growth and nodulation defects. These mutants do not suppress the nitrogen fixation defect. This implies that the functions of RpoH1 during growth and RpoH1/RpoH2 during the initiation of symbiosis are similar but that there is a different function of RpoH1 needed later during symbiosis. We showed that, unlike in Escherichia coli, overexpression of groESL is not sufficient to bypass any of the RpoH defects. Under free-living conditions, we determined that RpoH2 does not control expression of the groE genes, and RpoH1 only controls expression of groESL5. Finally, we completed the series of groE mutants by constructing groESL3 and groEL4 mutants and demonstrated that they do not display symbiotic defects. Therefore, the only groESL operon required by itself for symbiosis is groESL1. Taken together, these results suggest that GroEL/GroES production alone cannot explain the requirements for RpoH1 and RpoH2 in S. meliloti and that there must be other crucial targets.

An expanded protein folding cage in the GroEL-gp31 complex

Bacteriophage T4 produces a GroES analogue, gp31, which cooperates with the Escherichia coli GroEL to fold its major coat protein gp23. We have used cryo-electron microscopy and image processing to obtain three-dimensional structures of the E.coli chaperonin GroEL complexed with gp31, in the presence of both ATP and ADP. The GroEL-gp31-ADP map has a resolution of 8.2 A, which allows accurate fitting of the GroEL and gp31 crystal structures. Comparison of this fitted structure with that of the GroEL-GroES-ADP structure previously determined by cryo-electron microscopy shows that the folding cage is expanded. The enlarged volume for folding is consistent with the size of the bacteriophage coat protein gp23, which is the major substrate of GroEL-gp31 chaperonin complex. At 56 kDa, gp23 is close to the maximum size limit of a polypeptide that is thought to fit inside the GroEL-GroES folding cage.

Assembly and infection process of bacteriophage T4

Bacterophage T4 consists of three parts, namely, a head, a tail, and six tail fibers, each of which is assembled along an independent pathway and then joined. In contrast to simple plant viruses such as tobacco mosaic virus, disassembly and reassembly of the virion is not possible. This is due mainly to the fact that the assembly involves not only irreversible steps such as cleavage of covalent bonds of some constituent proteins, but also that it requires a scaffold and involves the inner membrane of the host cell. Another unique feature of the assembly as a biological nanomachine is the involvement of specific protein devices such as a "ruler molecule," which determines the length of the tail, an ATP-driven DNA packaging protein complex, and phage-encoded molecular chaperones. Recent structural biological studies of the phage started to unveil the molecular mechanics of structural transformation of the tail upon infection.

Monitoring macromolecular complexes involved in the chaperonin-assisted protein folding cycle by mass spectrometry

We have used native mass spectrometry to analyze macromolecular complexes involved in the chaperonin-assisted refolding of gp23, the major capsid protein of bacteriophage T4. Adapting the instrumental methods allowed us to monitor all intermediate complexes involved in the chaperonin folding cycle. We found that GroEL can bind up to two unfolded gp23 substrate molecules. Notably, when GroEL is in complex with the cochaperonin gp31, it binds exclusively one gp23. We also demonstrated that the folding and assembly of gp23 into 336-kDa hexamers by GroEL-gp31 can be monitored directly by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). These data reinforce the great potential of ESI-MS as a technique to investigate structure-function relationships of protein assemblies in general and the chaperonin-protein folding machinery in particular. A major advantage of native mass spectrometry is that, given sufficient resolution, it allows the analysis at the picomole level of sensitivity of heterogeneous protein complexes with molecular masses up to several million daltons.