Key role of proline L209 in connecting the distant quinone pockets in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Contribution of Protonation to the Dielectric Relaxation Arising from Bacteriopheophytin Reductions in the Photosynthetic Reaction Centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The pH dependence of the free energy level of the flash-induced primary charge pair P+IA- was determined by a combination of the results from the indirect charge recombination of P+QA- and from the delayed fluorescence of the excited dimer (P*) in the reaction center of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, where the native ubiquinone at the primary quinone binding site QA was replaced by low-potential anthraquinone (AQ) derivatives. The following observations were made: (1) The free energy state of P+IA- was pH independent below pH 10 (-370 ± 10 meV relative to that of the excited dimer P*) and showed a remarkable decrease (about 20 meV/pH unit) above pH 10. A part of the dielectric relaxation of the P+IA- charge pair that is not insignificant (about 120 meV) should come from protonation-related changes. (2) The single exponential decay character of the kinetics proves that the protonated/unprotonated P+IA- and P+QA- states are in equilibria and the rate constants of protonation konH +koffH are much larger than those of the charge back reaction kback ~103 s-1. (3) Highly similar pH profiles were measured to determine the free energy states of P+QA- and P+IA-, indicating that the same acidic cluster at around QB should respond to both anionic species. This was supported by model calculations based on anticooperative proton distribution in the cluster with key residues of GluL212, AspL213, AspM17, and GluH173, and the effect of the polarization of the aqueous phase on electrostatic interactions. The larger distance of IA- from the cluster (25.2 Å) compared to that of QA- (14.5 Å) is compensated by a smaller effective dielectric constant (6.5 ± 0.5 and 10.0 ± 0.5, respectively). (4) The P* → P+QA- and IA-QA → IAQA- electron transfers are enthalpy-driven reactions with the exemption of very large (>60%) or negligible entropic contributions in cases of substitution by 2,3-dimethyl-AQ or 1-chloro-AQ, respectively. The possible structural consequences are discussed.

Relaxation processes accompanying electron stabilization in the quinone acceptor part of Rb. sphaeroides reaction centers

The temperature dependence of the dark recombination rate in photooxidized bacteriochlorophyll (P) and photoreduced quinone acceptors (ubiquinones) Q_A and Q_B of photosynthetic reaction centers of purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides (Rb. sphaeroides) was studied. Photoinduced changes in the absorption were detected in the Q_x absorption band of photooxidized bacteriochlorophyll at 600 nm and in the bands corresponding to the redox changes of ubiquinones at 335 and 420-450 nm. Kinetic analysis was used to evaluate the activation energy and the characteristic time of the transient process of relaxation accompanying electron stabilization at the final quinone acceptor. A comparative study of the kinetics of oxidation-reduction reactions of photoactive bacteriochlorophyll RC purple bacteria and quinone acceptors in their individual absorption bands is an informative approach to studying the mechanisms of this stabilization. The analysis of the revealed kinetic differences makes it possible to estimate the activation energy and the characteristic times of the transition relaxation processes associated with the stabilization of the electron in the quinone acceptor part of RC. Purple bacterial reaction centers have fundamental similarities with PSII reaction centers. Such a similarity represents evolutional closeness between the two types of RC. So it is possible that the photoinduced charge separation in PSII RC, as well as in purple bacteria RC, is also accompanied by definite conformational changes. The possible role of hydrogen bonds of surrounding protein in the relaxation processes accompanying the electron transfer to quinone acceptors is discussed.

The nonheme iron in photosystem II

Photosystem II (PSII), the light-driven water:plastoquinone (PQ) oxidoreductase of oxygenic photosynthesis, contains a nonheme iron (NHI) at its electron acceptor side. The NHI is situated between the two PQs QA and QB that serve as one-electron transmitter and substrate of the reductase part of PSII, respectively. Among the ligands of the NHI is a (bi)carbonate originating from CO2, the substrate of the dark reactions of oxygenic photosynthesis. Based on recent advances in the crystallography of PSII, we review the structure of the NHI in PSII and discuss ideas concerning its function and the role of bicarbonate along with a comparison to the reaction center of purple bacteria and other enzymes containing a mononuclear NHI site.

Light-induced quinone reduction in photosystem II

The photosystem II core complex is the water:plastoquinone oxidoreductase of oxygenic photosynthesis situated in the thylakoid membrane of cyanobacteria, algae and plants. It catalyzes the light-induced transfer of electrons from water to plastoquinone accompanied by the net transport of protons from the cytoplasm (stroma) to the lumen, the production of molecular oxygen and the release of plastoquinol into the membrane phase. In this review, we outline our present knowledge about the "acceptor side" of the photosystem II core complex covering the reaction center with focus on the primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) quinones situated around the non-heme iron with bound (bi)carbonate and a comparison with the reaction center of purple bacteria. Related topics addressed are quinone diffusion channels for plastoquinone/plastoquinol exchange, the newly discovered third quinone Q(C), the relevance of lipids, the interactions of quinones with the still enigmatic cytochrome b559 and the role of Q(A) in photoinhibition and photoprotection mechanisms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Photosystem II.

On the role of electrostatics in protein-protein interactions

The role of electrostatics in protein-protein interactions and binding is reviewed in this paper. A brief outline of the computational modeling, in the framework of continuum electrostatics, is presented and the basic electrostatic effects occurring upon the formation of the complex are discussed. The effect of the salt concentration and pH of the water phase on protein-protein binding free energy is demonstrated which indicates that the increase of the salt concentration tends to weaken the binding, an observation that is attributed to the optimization of the charge-charge interactions across the interface. It is pointed out that the pH-optimum (pH of optimal binding affinity) varies among the protein-protein complexes, and perhaps is a result of their adaptation to particular subcellular compartments. The similarities and differences between hetero- and homo-complexes are outlined and discussed with respect to the binding mode and charge complementarity.

M234Glu is a component of the proton sponge in the reaction center from photosynthetic bacteria

Bacterial reaction centers use light energy to couple the uptake of protons to the successive semi-reduction of two quinones, namely Q(A) and Q(B). These molecules are situated symmetrically in regard to a non-heme iron atom. Four histidines and one glutamic acid, M234Glu, constitute the five ligands of this atom. By flash-induced absorption spectroscopy and delayed fluorescence we have studied in the M234EH and M234EL variants the role played by this acidic residue on the energetic balance between the two quinones as well as in proton uptake. Delayed fluorescence from the P(+)Q(A)(-) state (P is the primary electron donor) and temperature dependence of the rate of P(+)Q(A)(-) charge recombination that are in good agreement show that in the two RC variants, both Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-) are destabilized by about the same free energy amount: respectively approximately 100 +/- 5 meV and 90 +/- 5 meV for the M234EH and M234EL variants, as compared to the WT. Importantly, in the M234EH and M234EL variants we observe a collapse of the high pH band (present in the wild-type reaction center) of the proton uptake amplitudes associated with formation of Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-). This band has recently been shown to be a signature of a collective behaviour of an extended, multi-entry, proton uptake network. M234Glu seems to play a central role in the proton sponge-like system formed by the RC protein.

pH modulates the quinone position in the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the neutral and charge separated states

The structure of the photosynthetic reaction-center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been determined at four different pH values (6.5, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0) in the neutral and in charge separated states. At pH 8.0, in the neutral state, we obtain a resolution of 1.87 A, which is the best ever reported for the bacterial reaction center protein. Our crystallographic data confirm the existence of two different binding positions of the secondary quinone (QB). We observe a new orientation of QB in its distal position, which shows no ring-flip compared to the orientation in the proximal position. Datasets collected for the different pH values show a pH-dependence of the population of the proximal position. The new orientation of QB in the distal position and the pH-dependence could be confirmed by continuum electrostatics calculations. Our calculations are in agreement with the experimentally observed proton uptake upon charge separation. The high resolution of our crystallographic data allows us to identify new water molecules and external residues being involved in two previously described hydrogen bond proton channels. These extended proton-transfer pathways, ending at either of the two oxo-groups of QB in its proximal position, provide additional evidence that ring-flipping is not required for complete protonation of QB upon reduction.

Ubiquinone reduction in the photosynthetic reaction centre of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: interplay between electron transfer, proton binding and flips of the quinone ring

This review is focused on reactions that gate (control) the electron transfer between the primary quinone QA and secondary quinone QB in the photosynthetic reaction centre of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The results on electron and proton transfer are discussed in relation to structural information and to the steered molecular dynamics simulations of the QB ring flip in its binding pocket. Depending on the initial position of QB in the pocket and on certain conditions, the rate of electron transfer is suggested to be limited either by the quinone ring flip or by the charge-compensating proton equilibration between the surface and the buried QB site.

Characterization of the bonding interactions of QB upon photoreduction via A-branch or B-branch electron transfer in mutant reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RCs) containing the mutation Ala M260 to Trp (AM260W), transmembrane electron transfer along the full-length of the A-branch of cofactors is prevented by the loss of the Q(A) ubiquinone, but it is possible to generate the radical pair P(+)H(A)(-) by A-branch electron transfer or the radical pair P(+)Q(B)(-) by B-branch electron transfer. In the present study, FTIR spectroscopy was used to provide direct evidence for the complete absence of the Q(A) ubiquinone in mutant RCs with the AM260W mutation. Light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy of isolated RCs was also used to probe the neutral Q(B) and the semiquinone Q(B)(-) states in two B-branch active mutants, a double AM260W-LM214H mutant, denoted WH, and a quadruple mutant, denoted WAAH, in which the AM260W, LM214H, and EL212A-DL213A mutations were combined. The data were compared to those obtained with wild-type (Wt) RCs and the double EL212A-DL213A (denoted AA) mutant which exhibit the usual A-branch electron transfer to Q(B). The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectrum of the WH mutant is very close to that of Wt RCs indicating similar bonding interactions of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein in both RCs. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of the AA and WAAH mutants are also closely related to one another, but are very different to that of the Wt complex. Isotope-edited IR fingerprint spectra were obtained for the AA and WAAH mutants reconstituted with site-specific (13)C-labeled ubiquinone. Whilst perturbations of the interactions of the semiquinone Q(B)(-) with the protein are observed in the AA and WAAH mutants, the FTIR data show that the bonding interaction of neutral Q(B) in these two mutants are essentially the same as those for Wt RCs. Therefore, it is concluded that Q(B) occupies the same binding position proximal to the non-heme iron prior to reduction by either A-branch or B-branch electron transfer.

Proton release upon oxidation of tyrosine in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Markedly different light-induced protonational changes were measured in two reaction center mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. A quadruple mutant containing alterations, at residues L131, M160, M197, and M210, that elevate the midpoint potential of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer was compared to the Y(M) mutant, which contains these alterations plus a tyrosine at M164 serving as a secondary electron donor [Kálmán et al., Nature 402 (1999) 696]. In the quadruple mutant, a proton uptake of 0.1-0.3 H(+)/reaction center between pH 6 and 10 resulted from formation of the oxidized bacteriochlorophyll donor and reduced primary quinone. In the Y(M) mutant, a maximal proton release of -0.5 H(+)/reaction center at pH 8 was attributed to formation of the tyrosyl radical and modeled using electrostatic and direct proton-releasing mechanisms.

The DMPC lipid phase transition influences differently the first and the second electron transfer reactions in bacterial reaction centers

Photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were incorporated in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) liposomes. The first and second electron transfer rates (k(AB)(1) and k(AB)(2), respectively) between the first and the second quinone electron acceptors have been measured as a function of temperature, across the phase transition of DMPC (23 degrees C). The Eyring plots of k(AB)(1) display straight lines. In contrast, the Eyring plots for k(AB)(2) in proteoliposomes show a break at about 23.5 degrees C. This physical discrimination between the two electron transfer reactions demonstrates that the stiffness of the lipid environment of the RCs and/or the protein-protein interactions influence the parameters governing k(AB)(2), but not the gating process limiting k(AB)(1).