1
|
Ramachandran R, Ciaccia PN, Filsuf TA, Jha JK, Chattoraj DK. Chromosome 1 licenses chromosome 2 replication in Vibrio cholerae by doubling the crtS gene dosage. PLoS Genet 2018; 14:e1007426. [PMID: 29795553 PMCID: PMC5991422 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Initiation of chromosome replication in bacteria is precisely timed in the cell cycle. Bacteria that harbor multiple chromosomes face the additional challenge of orchestrating replication initiation of different chromosomes. In Vibrio cholerae, the smaller of its two chromosomes, Chr2, initiates replication after Chr1 such that both chromosomes terminate replication synchronously. The delay is due to the dependence of Chr2 initiation on the replication of a site, crtS, on Chr1. The mechanism by which replication of crtS allows Chr2 replication remains unclear. Here, we show that blocking Chr1 replication indeed blocks Chr2 replication, but providing an extra crtS copy in replication-blocked Chr1 permitted Chr2 replication. This demonstrates that unreplicated crtS copies have significant activity, and suggests that a role of replication is to double the copy number of the site that sufficiently increases its activity for licensing Chr2 replication. We further show that crtS activity promotes the Chr2-specific initiator function and that this activity is required in every cell cycle, as would be expected of a cell-cycle regulator. This study reveals how increase of gene dosage through replication can be utilized in a critical regulatory switch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Revathy Ramachandran
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Peter N. Ciaccia
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tara A. Filsuf
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jyoti K. Jha
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dhruba K. Chattoraj
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Random versus Cell Cycle-Regulated Replication Initiation in Bacteria: Insights from Studying Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2016; 81:81/1/e00033-16. [PMID: 27903655 DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00033-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacterial chromosomes initiate replication at a fixed time in the cell cycle, whereas there is generally no particular time for plasmid replication initiation or chromosomal replication initiation from integrated plasmids. In bacteria with divided genomes, the replication system of one of the chromosomes typically resembles that of bacteria with undivided genomes, whereas the remaining chromosomes have plasmid-like replication systems. For example, in Vibrio cholerae, a bacterium with two chromosomes (chromosome 1 [Chr1] and Chr2), the Chr1 system resembles that of the Escherichia coli chromosome, and the Chr2 system resembles that of iteron-based plasmids. However, Chr2 still initiates replication at a fixed time in the cell cycle and thus offers an opportunity to understand the molecular basis for the difference between random and cell cycle-regulated modes of replication. Here we review studies of replication control in Chr2 and compare it to those of plasmids and chromosomes. We argue that although the Chr2 control mechanisms in many ways are reminiscent of those of plasmids, they also appear to combine more regulatory features than are found on a typical plasmid, including some that are more typical of chromosomes. One of the regulatory mechanisms is especially novel, the coordinated timing of replication initiation of Chr1 and Chr2, providing the first example of communication between chromosomes for replication initiation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Single cell-level detection and quantitation of leaky protein expression from any strongly regulated bacterial system. Anal Biochem 2015; 484:180-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Revised: 06/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
4
|
Bartosik AA, Markowska A, Szarlak J, Kulińska A, Jagura-Burdzy G. Novel broad-host-range vehicles for cloning and shuffling of gene cassettes. J Microbiol Methods 2011; 88:53-62. [PMID: 22056795 DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2011] [Revised: 10/17/2011] [Accepted: 10/17/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Novel vectors for cloning and shuffling of gene cassettes based on minireplicon of broad-host-range RA3 plasmid from IncU incompatibility group were constructed. A series of minireplicon variants were prepared with copy number ranging from low (1-2 copies per chromosome), medium (10-15 copies per chromosome) to high copy number (80-90 copies per chromosome). The new cloning vectors are relatively small in size (4.5-5.4kb) and carry various resistance determinants: kanamycin (Km(R)), tetracycline (Tc(R)) or chloramphenicol (Cm(R)). The vectors were engineered to facilitate cloning and shuffling of the functional modules with or without transcriptional terminators. Using the described strategy, a bank of functional modules, ready for exchange, has been initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneta A Bartosik
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Pawinskiego 5A, Poland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zakrzewska-Czerwińska J, Jakimowicz D, Zawilak-Pawlik A, Messer W. Regulation of the initiation of chromosomal replication in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2007; 31:378-87. [PMID: 17459114 DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00070.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The initiation of chromosomal replication occurs only once during the cell cycle in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Initiation of chromosome replication is the first and tightly controlled step of a DNA synthesis. Bacterial chromosome replication is initiated at a single origin, oriC, by the initiator protein DnaA, which specifically interacts with 9-bp non-palindromic sequences (DnaA boxes) at oriC. In Escherichia coli, a model organism used to study the mechanism of DNA replication and its regulation, the control of initiation relies on a reduction of the availability and/or activity of the two key elements, DnaA and the oriC region. This review summarizes recent research into the regulatory mechanisms of the initiation of chromosomal replication in bacteria, with emphasis on organisms other than E. coli.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Initiation of DNA replication is a highly regulated process in all organisms. Proteins that are required to recruit DNA polymerase - initiator proteins - are often used to regulate the timing or frequency of initiation in the cell cycle by limiting either their own synthesis or availability. Studies of the Escherichia coli chromosome and of bacterial plasmids with iterated initiator binding sites (iterons) have revealed that, in addition to initiator limitation, replication origin inactivation is used to prevent replication that is untimely or excessive. Our recent studies of plasmid P1 revealed that this additional mode of control becomes a requirement when initiator availability is limited only by autoregulation. Thus, although initiator limitation appears to be a well-conserved and central mode of replication control, optimal replication might require additional control mechanisms. This review gives examples of how the multiple mechanisms can act synergistically, antagonistically or be partially redundant to guarantee low frequency events. The lessons learned are likely to help understand many other regulatory systems in the bacterial cell.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Paulsson
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pal D, Venkova-Canova T, Srivastava P, Chattoraj DK. Multipartite regulation of rctB, the replication initiator gene of Vibrio cholerae chromosome II. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:7167-75. [PMID: 16237000 PMCID: PMC1272990 DOI: 10.1128/jb.187.21.7167-7175.2005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Replication initiator proteins in bacteria not only allow DNA replication but also often regulate the rate of replication initiation as well. The regulation is mediated by limiting the synthesis or availability of initiator proteins. The applicability of this principle is demonstrated here for RctB, the replication initiator for the smaller of the two chromosomes of Vibrio cholerae. A strong promoter for the rctB gene named rctBp was identified and found to be autoregulated in Escherichia coli. Promoter activity was lower in V. cholerae than in E. coli, and a part of this reduction is likely to be due to autorepression. Sequences upstream of rctBp, implicated earlier in replication control, enhanced the repression. The action of the upstream sequences required that they be present in cis, implying long-range interactions in the control of the promoter activity. A second gene specific for chromosome II replication, rctA, reduced rctB translation, most likely by antisense RNA control. Finally, optimal rctBp activity was found to be dependent on Dam. Increasing RctB in trans increased the copy number of a miniplasmid carrying oriCII(VC), implying that RctB can be rate limiting for chromosome II replication. The multiple modes of control on RctB are expected to reduce fluctuations in the initiator concentration and thereby help maintain chromosome copy number homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debasish Pal
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, Center for Cancer Research, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dasgupta S, Løbner-Olesen A. Host controlled plasmid replication: Escherichia coli minichromosomes. Plasmid 2005; 52:151-68. [PMID: 15518873 DOI: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2004.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2004] [Revised: 08/06/2004] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Escherichia coli minichromosomes are plasmids replicating exclusively from a cloned copy of oriC, the chromosomal origin of replication. They are therefore subject to the same types of replication control as imposed on the chromosome. Unlike natural plasmid replicons, minichromosomes do not adjust their replication rate to the cellular copy number and they do not contain information for active partitioning at cell division. Analysis of mutant strains where minichromosomes cannot be established suggest that their mere existence is dependent on the factors that ensure timely once per cell cycle initiation of replication. These observations indicate that replication initiation in E. coli is normally controlled in such a way that all copies of oriC contained within the cell, chromosomal and minichromosomal, are initiated within a fairly short time interval of the cell cycle. Furthermore, both replication and segregation of the bacterial chromosome seem to be controlled by sequences outside the origin itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santanu Dasgupta
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Centre, Box 596, SE-751 24, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Das N, Valjavec-Gratian M, Basuray AN, Fekete RA, Papp PP, Paulsson J, Chattoraj DK. Multiple homeostatic mechanisms in the control of P1 plasmid replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:2856-61. [PMID: 15708977 PMCID: PMC549481 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409790102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Many organisms control initiation of DNA replication by limiting supply or activity of initiator proteins. In plasmids, such as P1, initiators are limited primarily by transcription and dimerization. However, the relevance of initiator limitation to plasmid copy number control has appeared doubtful, because initiator oversupply increases the copy number only marginally. Copy number control instead has been attributed to initiator-mediated plasmid pairing ("handcuffing"), because initiator mutations to handcuffing deficiency elevates the copy number significantly. Here, we present genetic evidence of a role for initiator limitation in plasmid copy number control by showing that autorepression-defective initiator mutants also can elevate the plasmid copy number. We further show, by quantitative modeling, that initiator dimerization is a homeostatic mechanism that dampens active monomer increase when the protein is oversupplied. This finding implies that oversupplied initiator proteins are largely dimeric, partly accounting for their limited ability to increase copy number. A combination of autorepression, dimerization, and handcuffing appears to account fully for control of P1 plasmid copy number.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilangshu Das
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Song JY, Choi SH, Byun EY, Lee SG, Park YH, Park SG, Lee SK, Kim KM, Park JU, Kang HL, Baik SC, Lee WK, Cho MJ, Youn HS, Ko GH, Bae DW, Rhee KH. Characterization of a small cryptic plasmid, pHP51, from a Korean isolate of strain 51 of Helicobacter pylori. Plasmid 2003; 50:145-51. [PMID: 12932740 DOI: 10.1016/s0147-619x(03)00059-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The nucleotide sequence of a 3955-bp Helicobacter pylori plasmid, pHP51 was determined, and two open reading frames, ORF1 and ORF2, were identified. The deduced amino acid sequence of ORF1 was highly conserved (87-89%) among plasmid replication initiation proteins, RepBs. The function of ORF2 was not assigned because it lacked known functional domains or sequence similarity with other known proteins, although it had a HPFXXGNG motif that was also found in the cAMP-induced filamentation (fic) gene. Three kinds of repeats were present on the plasmid outside of the ORFs, including the R1 and R2 repeats that are common in H. pylori plasmids. One 100-bp sequence detected in the noncoding region of pHP51 was highly similar to the genomic sequence of H. pylori 26695.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Young Song
- Department of Microbiology, Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 90 Chiram-dong, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do 660-751, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Løbner-Olesen A, Marinus MG, Hansen FG. Role of SeqA and Dam in Escherichia coli gene expression: a global/microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:4672-7. [PMID: 12682301 PMCID: PMC153614 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0538053100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
High-density oligonucleotide arrays were used to monitor global transcription patterns in Escherichia coli with various levels of Dam and SeqA proteins. Cells lacking Dam methyltransferase showed a modest increase in transcription of the genes belonging to the SOS regulon. Bacteria devoid of the SeqA protein, which preferentially binds hemimethylated DNA, were found to have a transcriptional profile almost identical to WT bacteria overexpressing Dam methyltransferase. The latter two strains differed from WT in two ways. First, the origin proximal genes were transcribed with increased frequency due to increased gene dosage. Second, chromosomal domains of high transcriptional activity alternate with regions of low activity, and our results indicate that the activity in each domain is modulated in the same way by SeqA deficiency or Dam overproduction. We suggest that the methylation status of the cell is an important factor in forming and/or maintaining chromosome structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Løbner-Olesen
- Department of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Roskilde University, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hou R, Hill TM. Loss of RecA function affects the ability of Escherichia coli to maintain recombinant plasmids containing a Ter site. Plasmid 2002; 47:36-50. [PMID: 11798284 DOI: 10.1006/plas.2001.1553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
In the Escherichia coli chromosome, DNA replication forks arrested by a Tus-Ter complex or by DNA damage are reinitiated through pathways that involve RecA and numerous other recombination functions. To examine the role of recombination in the processing of replication forks arrested by a Tus-Ter complex, the requirements for recombination-associated gene products were assessed in cells carrying Ter plasmids, i.e., plasmids that contain a Ter site oriented to block DNA replication. Of the E. coli recombination functions tested, only loss of recA conferred an observable phenotype on cells containing a Ter plasmid, which was inefficient transformation and reduced ability to maintain a Ter plasmid when Tus was expressed. Given the current understanding of replication reinitiation, the simplest explanation for the restriction of Ter plasmid maintenance was a reduced ability to restart plasmid replication in a recA tus(+) background. However, we were unable to detect a difference in the efficiency of replication arrest by Tus in recA-proficient and recA-deficient cells, which suggests that the inability to restart arrested replication forks is not the cause of the restriction on growth, but is due to an additional function provided by RecA. Other explanations for restriction of Ter plasmid maintenance were examined, including plasmid multimerization, plasmid rearrangements, and copy number differences. The most likely cause of the restriction on Ter plasmid maintenance was a reduced copy number in recA cells that was detected when the copy number was measured in relation to an external control. Possibly, loss of RecA function leads to improper processing of replication forks arrested at a Ter site, leading to the generation of degradation-prone substrates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runhua Hou
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202-9037
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Park K, Han E, Paulsson J, Chattoraj DK. Origin pairing ('handcuffing') as a mode of negative control of P1 plasmid copy number. EMBO J 2001; 20:7323-32. [PMID: 11743008 PMCID: PMC125786 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In one family of bacterial plasmids, multiple initiator binding sites, called iterons, are used for initiation of plasmid replication as well as for the control of plasmid copy number. Iterons can also pair in vitro via the bound initiators. This pairing, called handcuffing, has been suggested to cause steric hindrance to initiation and thereby control the copy number. To test this hypothesis, we have compared copy numbers of isogenic miniP1 plasmid monomer and dimer. The dimer copy number was only one-quarter that of the monomer, suggesting that the higher local concentration of origins in the dimer facilitated their pairing. Physical evidence consistent with iteron-mediated pairing of origins preferentially in the dimer was obtained in vivo. Thus, origin handcuffing can be a mechanism to control P1 plasmid replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyusung Park
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255 and
Princeton University, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Present address: Invitrogen, 1610 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Corresponding author e-mail:
| | | | - Johan Paulsson
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255 and
Princeton University, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Present address: Invitrogen, 1610 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Corresponding author e-mail:
| | - Dhruba K. Chattoraj
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255 and
Princeton University, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Present address: Invitrogen, 1610 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Corresponding author e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park K, Chattoraj DK. DnaA boxes in the P1 plasmid origin: the effect of their position on the directionality of replication and plasmid copy number. J Mol Biol 2001; 310:69-81. [PMID: 11419937 DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The DnaA protein is essential for initiation of DNA replication in a wide variety of bacterial and plasmid replicons. The replication origin in these replicons invariably contains specific binding sites for the protein, called DnaA boxes. Plasmid P1 contains a set of DnaA boxes at each end of its origin but can function with either one of the sets. Here we report that the location of origin-opening, initiation site of replication forks and directionality of replication do not change whether the boxes are present at both or at one of the ends of the origin. Replication was bidirectional in all cases. These results imply that DnaA functions similarly from the two ends of the origin. However, origins with DnaA boxes proximal to the origin-opening location opened more efficiently and maintained plasmids at higher copy numbers. Origins with the distal set were inactive unless the adjacent P1 DNA sequences beyond the boxes were included. At either end, phasing of the boxes with respect to the remainder of the origin influenced the copy number. Thus, although the boxes can be at either end, their precise context is critical for efficient origin function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Park
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bogan JA, Grimwade JE, Thornton M, Zhou P, Denning GD, Helmstetter CE. P1 and NR1 plasmid replication during the cell cycle of Escherichia coli. Plasmid 2001; 45:200-8. [PMID: 11407915 DOI: 10.1006/plas.2000.1512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Replication patterns of the miniP1 plasmid pZC176, the miniNR1 plasmid pRR933, and the high-copy miniNR1 derivative pRR942 were examined during the Escherichia coli cell division cycle and compared to the cycle-specific replication pattern of a minichromosome and the cycle nonspecific pattern of pBR322. In E. coli cells growing with doubling times of 40 and 60 min, the miniP1 plasmid was found to replicate with a slight periodicity during the division cycle. The periodicity was not nearly as pronounced as that of the minichromosome, was not affected by the presence of a minichromosome, and was not evident in cells growing more rapidly with a doubling time of 25 min. Both miniNR1 plasmids, pRR933 and pRR942, replicated with patterns indistinguishable from that of pBR322 and clearly different from that of the minichromosome. It is concluded that both P1 and NR1 plasmids can replicate at all stages of the cell cycle but that P1 displays a slight periodicity in replication probability in the cycle of slower growing cells. This periodicity does not appear to be coupled to a specific age in the cycle, but could be associated with the achievement of a specific cell mass per plasmid. During temperature shifts of a dnaC(Ts) mutant, the miniP1 plasmid and pBR322 replicated with similar patterns that differed from that of the minichromosome, but were consistent with a brief eclipse between rounds of replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Bogan
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, 32901, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Bacterial plasmids deploy a diverse range of regulatory mechanisms to control expression of the functions they need to survive in the host population. Understanding of the mechanisms by which autoregulatory circuits control plasmid survival functions, in particular plasmid replication, has been advanced by recent studies. At a molecular level, structural understanding of how certain antisense RNAs control replication and stability functions is almost complete. Control circuits linking plasmid transfer functions to the status of the bacterial population have been dissected, uncovering a complex and hierarchical organisation. Coordinate or global regulation of plasmid replication, transfer and stable maintenance functions is becoming apparent across a range of plasmid families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E Bingle
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Replication origins of a family of bacterial plasmids have multiple sites, called iterons, for binding a plasmid-specific replication initiator protein. The iteron-initiator interactions are essential for plasmid replication as well as for inhibition of plasmid over-replication. The inhibition increases with plasmid copy number and eventually shuts plasmid replication off completely. The mechanism of inhibition appears to be handcuffing, the coupling of origins via iteron-bound initiators that block origin function. The probability of a trans-reaction such as handcuffing is expected to increase with plasmid copy number and diminish with increases in cell volume, explaining how the copy number can be maintained in a growing cell. Control is also exerted at the level of initiator synthesis and activation by chaperones. We propose that increases in active initiators promote initiation by overcoming handcuffing, but handcuffing dominates when the copy number reaches a threshold. Handcuffing should be ultrasensitive to copy number, as the negative control by iterons can be stringent (switch-like).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D K Chattoraj
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255, USA.
| |
Collapse
|