A universal transportin protein drives stochastic choice of olfactory neurons via specific nuclear import of a sox-2-activating factor

Neurogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans

Animals rely on their nervous systems to process sensory inputs, integrate these with internal signals, and produce behavioral outputs. This is enabled by the highly specialized morphologies and functions of neurons. Neuronal cells share multiple structural and physiological features, but they also come in a large diversity of types or classes that give the nervous system its broad range of functions and plasticity. This diversity, first recognized over a century ago, spurred classification efforts based on morphology, function, and molecular criteria. Caenorhabditis elegans, with its precisely mapped nervous system at the anatomical level, an extensive molecular description of most of its neurons, and its genetic amenability, has been a prime model for understanding how neurons develop and diversify at a mechanistic level. Here, we review the gene regulatory mechanisms driving neurogenesis and the diversification of neuron classes and subclasses in C. elegans. We discuss our current understanding of the specification of neuronal progenitors and their differentiation in terms of the transcription factors involved and ensuing changes in gene expression and chromatin landscape. The central theme that has emerged is that the identity of a neuron is defined by modules of gene batteries that are under control of parallel yet interconnected regulatory mechanisms. We focus on how, to achieve these terminal identities, cells integrate information along their developmental lineages. Moreover, we discuss how neurons are diversified postembryonically in a time-, genetic sex-, and activity-dependent manner. Finally, we discuss how the understanding of neuronal development can provide insights into the evolution of neuronal diversity.

Sox2 and βIII-Tubulin as Biomarkers of Drug Resistance in Poorly Differentiated Sinonasal Carcinomas

Poorly differentiated sinonasal carcinomas (PDCs) are tumors that have a poor prognosis despite advances in classical treatment. Predictive and prognostic markers and new personalized treatments could improve the oncological outcomes of patients. In this study, we analyzed SOX2 and βIII-tubulin as biomarkers that could have prognostic and therapeutic impacts on these tumors. The cohort included 57 cases of PDCs: 36 sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) cases, 13 olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) cases, and 8 sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) cases. Clinical follow-up data were available for 26 of these cases. Sox2 expression was detected using immunohistochemistry in 6 (75%) SNEC cases, 19 (53%) SNUC cases, and 6 (46%) ONB cases. The absence of Sox2 staining correlated with a higher rate of recurrence (p = 0.015), especially distant recurrence. The majority of cases showed βIII-tubulin expression, with strong positivity in 85%, 75%, and 64% of SNEC, ONB, and SNUC cases, respectively. Tumors with stronger βIII-tubulin expression demonstrated longer disease-free survival than those with no expression or low expression (p = 0.049). Sox2 and βIII-tubulin expression is common in poorly differentiated sinonasal tumors and has prognostic and therapeutic utility.

Whole genome sequencing facilitates intragenic variant interpretation following modifier screening in C. elegans

Background

Intragenic modifiers (in-phase, second-site variants) are known to have dramatic effects on clinical outcomes, affecting disease attributes such as severity or age of onset. However, despite their clinical importance, the focus of many genetic screens in model systems is on the discovery of extragenic variants, with many labs still relying upon more traditional methods to identify modifiers. However, traditional methods such as PCR and Sanger sequencing can be time-intensive and do not permit a thorough understanding of the intragenic modifier effects in the context of non-isogenic genomic backgrounds.

Results

Here, we apply high throughput approaches to identify and understand intragenic modifiers using Caenorhabditis elegans. Specifically, we applied whole genome sequencing (WGS) to a mutagen-induced forward genetic screen to identify intragenic suppressors of a temperature-sensitive zyg-1(it25) allele in C. elegans. ZYG-1 is a polo kinase that is important for centriole function and cell divisions, and mutations that truncate its human orthologue, PLK4, have been associated with microcephaly. Combining WGS and CRISPR/Cas9, we rapidly identify intragenic modifiers, show that these variants are distributed non-randomly throughout zyg-1 and that genomic context plays an important role on phenotypic outcomes.

Conclusions

Ultimately, our work shows that WGS facilitates high-throughput identification of intragenic modifiers in clinically relevant genes by reducing hands-on research time and overall costs and by allowing thorough understanding of the intragenic phenotypic effects in the context of different genetic backgrounds.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-08142-8.

Synergistic roles of homeodomain proteins UNC-62 homothorax and MLS-2 HMX/NKX in the specification of olfactory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans

General identity of the Caenorhabditis elegans AWC olfactory neuron pair is specified by the OTX/OTD transcription factor CEH-36 and the HMG-box transcription factor SOX-2, followed by asymmetrical differentiation of the pair into two distinct subtypes, default AWCOFF and induced AWCON, through a stochastic signaling event. The HMX/NKX transcription factor MLS-2 regulates the expression of ceh-36 to specify general AWC identity. However, general AWC identity is lost in only one of the two AWC cells in the majority of mls-2 null mutants displaying defective general AWC identity, suggesting that additional transcription factors have a partially overlapping role with MLS-2 in the specification of general AWC identity. Here, we identify a role of unc-62, encoding a homothorax/Meis/TALE homeodomain protein, in the specification of general AWC identity. As in mls-2 null mutants, unc-62 null mutants showed an incomplete penetrance in loss of general AWC identity. However, unc-62; mls-2 double mutants display a nearly complete penetrance of identity loss in both AWC cells. Thus, unc-62 and mls-2 have a partially overlapping function in the specification of general AWC identity. Furthermore, our genetic results suggest that mls-2 and unc-62 act cell autonomously in promoting the AWCON subtype. Together, our findings reveal the sequential roles of the unc-62 and mls-2 pair in AWC development, specification of general AWC identity in early embryogenesis, and asymmetric differentiation of AWC subtypes in late embryogenesis.

Karyopherin-βs play a key role as a phase separation regulator

Recent studies have revealed that cells utilize liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) as a mechanism in assembly of membrane-less organelles, such as RNP granules. The nucleus is a well-known membrane-bound organelle surrounded by the nuclear envelope; the nuclear pore complex on the nuclear envelope likely applies LLPS in the central channel to facilitate selective biological macromolecule exchange. Karyopherin-β family proteins exclusively pass through the central channel with cargos by dissolving the phase separated hydrogel formed by the phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeats-containing nucleoporins. Karyopherin-βs also exhibit dissolution activity for the phase separation of cargo proteins. Many cargos, including RNA-binding proteins containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), undergo phase separation; however, aberrant phase separation is linked to fatal neurodegenerative diseases. Multiple weak interactions between karyopherin-βs and phase separation-prone proteins, such as FG repeats-containing nucleoporins or IDR-containing karyopherin-β cargos, are likely to be important for passing through the nuclear pore complex and maintaining the soluble state of cargo, respectively. In this review, we discuss how karyopherin-βs regulate phase separation to function.