Heading perception depends on time-varying evolution of optic flow

Motor "laziness" constrains fixation selection in real-world tasks

Humans coordinate their eye, head, and body movements to gather information from a dynamic environment while maximizing reward and minimizing biomechanical and energetic costs. However, such natural behavior is not possible in traditional experiments employing head/body restraints and artificial, static stimuli. Therefore, it is unclear to what extent mechanisms of fixation selection discovered in lab studies, such as inhibition-of-return (IOR), influence everyday behavior. To address this gap, participants performed nine real-world tasks, including driving, visually searching for an item, and building a Lego set, while wearing a mobile eye tracker (169 recordings; 26.6 h). Surprisingly, in all tasks, participants most often returned to what they just viewed and saccade latencies were shorter preceding return than forward saccades, i.e., consistent with facilitation, rather than inhibition, of return. We hypothesize that conservation of eye and head motor effort ("laziness") contributes. Correspondingly, we observed center biases in fixation position and duration relative to the head's orientation. A model that generates scanpaths by randomly sampling these distributions reproduced all return phenomena we observed, including distinct 3-fixation sequences for forward versus return saccades. After controlling for orbital eccentricity, one task (building a Lego set) showed evidence for IOR. This, along with small discrepancies between model and data, indicates that the brain balances minimization of motor costs with maximization of rewards (e.g., accomplished by IOR and other mechanisms) and that the optimal balance varies according to task demands. Supporting this account, the orbital range of motion used in each task traded off lawfully with fixation duration.

Target motion misjudgments reflect a misperception of the background; revealed using continuous psychophysics

Determining the velocities of target objects as we navigate complex environments is made more difficult by the fact that our own motion adds systematic motion signals to the visual scene. The flow-parsing hypothesis asserts that the background motion is subtracted from visual scenes in such cases as a way for the visual system to determine target motions relative to the scene. Here, we address the question of why backgrounds are only partially subtracted in lab settings. At the same time, we probe a much-neglected aspect of scene perception in flow-parsing studies, that is, the perception of the background itself. Here, we present results from three experienced psychophysical participants and one inexperienced participant who took part in three continuous psychophysics experiments. We show that, when the background optic flow pattern is composed of local elements whose motions are congruent with the global optic flow pattern, the incompleteness of the background subtraction can be entirely accounted for by a misperception of the background. When the local velocities comprising the background are randomly dispersed around the average global velocity, an additional factor is needed to explain the subtraction incompleteness. We show that a model where background perception is a result of the brain attempting to infer scene motion due to self-motion can account for these results.

Neurons in Primate Area MSTd Signal Eye Movement Direction Inferred from Dynamic Perspective Cues in Optic Flow

Smooth eye movements are common during natural viewing; we frequently rotate our eyes to track moving objects or to maintain fixation on an object during self-movement. Reliable information about smooth eye movements is crucial to various neural computations, such as estimating heading from optic flow or judging depth from motion parallax. While it is well established that extraretinal signals (e.g., efference copies of motor commands) carry critical information about eye velocity, the rotational optic flow field produced by eye rotations also carries valuable information. Although previous work has shown that dynamic perspective cues in optic flow can be used in computations that require estimates of eye velocity, it has remained unclear where and how the brain processes these visual cues and how they are integrated with extraretinal signals regarding eye rotation. We examined how neurons in the dorsal region of the medial superior temporal area (MSTd) of two male rhesus monkeys represent the direction of smooth pursuit eye movements based on both visual cues (dynamic perspective) and extraretinal signals. We find that most MSTd neurons have matched preferences for the direction of eye rotation based on visual and extraretinal signals. Moreover, neural responses to combinations of these signals are well predicted by a weighted linear summation model. These findings demonstrate a neural substrate for representing the velocity of smooth eye movements based on rotational optic flow and establish area MSTd as a key node for integrating visual and extraretinal signals into a more generalized representation of smooth eye movements.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We frequently rotate our eyes to smoothly track objects of interest during self-motion. Information about eye velocity is crucial for a variety of computations performed by the brain, including depth perception and heading perception. Traditionally, information about eye rotation has been thought to arise mainly from extraretinal signals, such as efference copies of motor commands. Previous work shows that eye velocity can also be inferred from rotational optic flow that accompanies smooth eye movements, but the neural origins of these visual signals about eye rotation have remained unknown. We demonstrate that macaque neurons signal the direction of smooth eye rotation based on visual signals, and that they integrate both visual and extraretinal signals regarding eye rotation in a congruent fashion.

Temporal stability of human heading perception

Humans are capable of accurately judging their heading from optic flow during straight forward self-motion. Despite the global coherence in the optic flow field, however, visual clutter and other naturalistic conditions create constant flux on the eye. This presents a problem that must be overcome to accurately perceive heading from optic flow-the visual system must maintain sensitivity to optic flow variations that correspond with actual changes in self-motion and disregard those that do not. One solution could involve integrating optic flow over time to stabilize heading signals while suppressing transient fluctuations. Stability, however, may come at the cost of sluggishness. Here, we investigate the stability of human heading perception when subjects judge their heading after the simulated direction of self-motion changes. We found that the initial heading exerted an attractive influence on judgments of the final heading. Consistent with an evolving heading representation, bias toward the initial heading increased with the size of the heading change and as the viewing duration of the optic flow consistent with the final heading decreased. Introducing periods of sensory dropout (blackouts) later in the trial increased bias whereas an earlier one did not. Simulations of a neural model, the Competitive Dynamics Model, demonstrates that a mechanism that produces an evolving heading signal through recurrent competitive interactions largely captures the human data. Our findings characterize how the visual system balances stability in heading perception with sensitivity to change and support the hypothesis that heading perception evolves over time.

Distributed encoding of curvilinear self-motion across spiral optic flow patterns

Self-motion along linear paths without eye movements creates optic flow that radiates from the direction of travel (heading). Optic flow-sensitive neurons in primate brain area MSTd have been linked to linear heading perception, but the neural basis of more general curvilinear self-motion perception is unknown. The optic flow in this case is more complex and depends on the gaze direction and curvature of the path. We investigated the extent to which signals decoded from a neural model of MSTd predict the observer's curvilinear self-motion. Specifically, we considered the contributions of MSTd-like units that were tuned to radial, spiral, and concentric optic flow patterns in "spiral space". Self-motion estimates decoded from units tuned to the full set of spiral space patterns were substantially more accurate and precise than those decoded from units tuned to radial expansion. Decoding only from units tuned to spiral subtypes closely approximated the performance of the full model. Only the full decoding model could account for human judgments when path curvature and gaze covaried in self-motion stimuli. The most predictive units exhibited bias in center-of-motion tuning toward the periphery, consistent with neurophysiology and prior modeling. Together, findings support a distributed encoding of curvilinear self-motion across spiral space.

Retinal optic flow during natural locomotion

We examine the structure of the visual motion projected on the retina during natural locomotion in real world environments. Bipedal gait generates a complex, rhythmic pattern of head translation and rotation in space, so without gaze stabilization mechanisms such as the vestibular-ocular-reflex (VOR) a walker’s visually specified heading would vary dramatically throughout the gait cycle. The act of fixation on stable points in the environment nulls image motion at the fovea, resulting in stable patterns of outflow on the retinae centered on the point of fixation. These outflowing patterns retain a higher order structure that is informative about the stabilized trajectory of the eye through space. We measure this structure by applying the curl and divergence operations on the retinal flow velocity vector fields and found features that may be valuable for the control of locomotion. In particular, the sign and magnitude of foveal curl in retinal flow specifies the body’s trajectory relative to the gaze point, while the point of maximum divergence in the retinal flow field specifies the walker’s instantaneous overground velocity/momentum vector in retinotopic coordinates. Assuming that walkers can determine the body position relative to gaze direction, these time-varying retinotopic cues for the body’s momentum could provide a visual control signal for locomotion over complex terrain. In contrast, the temporal variation of the eye-movement-free, head-centered flow fields is large enough to be problematic for use in steering towards a goal. Consideration of optic flow in the context of real-world locomotion therefore suggests a re-evaluation of the role of optic flow in the control of action during natural behavior.

We recorded the full body kinematics and binocular gaze of humans walking through real-world natural environment and estimated visual motion (optic flow) using both computational video analysis and geometric simulation. Contrary to the established theories of the role of optic flow in the control of locomotion, we found that eye-movement-free, head-centric optic flow is highly unstable due to the complex phasic trajectory of the head during natural locomotion, rendering it an unlikely candidate for heading perception. In contrast, retina-centered optic flow consisted of a regular pattern of outflowing motion centered on the fovea. Retinal optic flow contained highly consistent patterns that specified the walker’s trajectory relative to the point of fixation, which may provide powerful, retinotopic cues that may be used for the visual control of locomotion in natural environments. This examination of optic flow in real-world contexts suggest a need to re-evaluate existing theories of the role of optic flow in the visual control of action during natural behavior.

Modeling Physiological Sources of Heading Bias from Optic Flow

Human heading perception from optic flow is accurate for directions close to the straight-ahead and systematic biases emerge in the periphery (Cuturi and Macneilage, 2013; Sun et al., 2020). In pursuit of the underlying neural mechanisms, primate brain dorsal medial superior temporal (MSTd) area has been a focus because of its causal link with heading perception (Gu et al., 2012). Computational models generally explain heading sensitivity in individual MSTd neurons as a feedforward integration of motion signals from medial temporal (MT) area that resemble full-field optic flow patterns consistent with the preferred heading direction (Britten, 2008; Mineault et al., 2012). In the present simulation study, we quantified within the structure of this feedforward model how physiological properties of MT and MSTd shape heading signals. We found that known physiological tuning characteristics generally supported the accuracy of heading estimation, but not always. A weak-to-moderate overrepresentation of peripheral headings in MSTd garnered the highest accuracy and precision out of the models that we tested. The model also performed well when noise corrupted high proportions of the optic flow vectors. Such a peripheral MSTd model performed well when units possessed a range of receptive field (RF) sizes and were strongly direction tuned. Physiological biases in MT direction tuning toward the radial direction also supported heading estimation, but the tendency for MT preferred speed and RF size to scale with eccentricity did not. Our findings help elucidate the extent to which different physiological tuning properties influence the accuracy and precision of neural heading signals.

Cognitive, Systems, and Computational Neurosciences of the Self in Motion

Navigating by path integration requires continuously estimating one's self-motion. This estimate may be derived from visual velocity and/or vestibular acceleration signals. Importantly, these senses in isolation are ill-equipped to provide accurate estimates, and thus visuo-vestibular integration is an imperative. After a summary of the visual and vestibular pathways involved, the crux of this review focuses on the human and theoretical approaches that have outlined a normative account of cue combination in behavior and neurons, as well as on the systems neuroscience efforts that are searching for its neural implementation. We then highlight a contemporary frontier in our state of knowledge: understanding how velocity cues with time-varying reliabilities are integrated into an evolving position estimate over prolonged time periods. Further, we discuss how the brain builds internal models inferring when cues ought to be integrated versus segregated-a process of causal inference. Lastly, we suggest that the study of spatial navigation has not yet addressed its initial condition: self-location. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.