Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA repair helicase UvrD1 is activated by redox-dependent dimerization via a 2B domain cysteine

Subunit Communication within Dimeric SF1 DNA Helicases

Monomers of the Superfamily (SF) 1 helicases, E. coli Rep and UvrD, can translocate directionally along single stranded (ss) DNA, but must be activated to function as helicases. In the absence of accessory factors, helicase activity requires Rep and UvrD homo-dimerization. The ssDNA binding sites of SF1 helicases contain a conserved aromatic amino acid (Trp250 in Rep and Trp256 in UvrD) that stacks with the DNA bases. Here we show that mutation of this Trp to Ala eliminates helicase activity in both Rep and UvrD. Rep(W250A) and UvrD(W256A) can still dimerize, bind DNA, and monomers still retain ATP-dependent ssDNA translocase activity, although with ∼10-fold lower rates and lower processivities than wild type monomers. Although neither wtRep monomers nor Rep(W250A) monomers possess helicase activity by themselves, using both ensemble and single molecule methods, we show that helicase activity is achieved upon formation of a Rep(W250A)/wtRep hetero-dimer. An ATPase deficient Rep monomer is unable to activate a wtRep monomer indicating that ATPase activity is needed in both subunits of the Rep hetero-dimer. We find the same results with E. coli UvrD and its equivalent mutant (UvrD(W256A)). Importantly, Rep(W250A) is unable to activate a wtUvrD monomer and UvrD(W256A) is unable to activate a wtRep monomer indicating that specific dimer interactions are required for helicase activity. We also demonstrate subunit communication within the dimer by virtue of Trp fluorescence signals that only are present within the Rep dimer, but not the monomers. These results bear on proposed subunit switching mechanisms for dimeric helicase activity.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ku Stimulates Multi-round DNA Unwinding by UvrD1 Monomers

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative agent of Tuberculosis. During the host response to infection, the bacterium is exposed to both reactive oxygen species and nitrogen intermediates that can cause DNA damage. It is becoming clear that the DNA damage response in Mtb and related actinobacteria function via distinct pathways as compared to well-studied model bacteria. For example, we have previously shown that the DNA repair helicase UvrD1 is activated for processive unwinding via redox-dependent dimerization. In addition, mycobacteria contain a homo-dimeric Ku protein, homologous to the eukaryotic Ku70/Ku80 dimer, that plays roles in double-stranded break repair via non-homologous end-joining. Kuhas been shown to stimulate the helicase activity of UvrD1, but the molecular mechanism, as well as which redox form of UvrD1 is activated, is unknown. We show here that Ku specifically stimulates multi-round unwinding by UvrD1 monomers which are able to slowly unwind DNA, but at rates 100-fold slower than the dimer. We also demonstrate that the UvrD1 C-terminal Tudor domain is required for the formation of a Ku-UvrD1 protein complex and activation. We show that Mtb Ku dimers bind with high nearest neighbor cooperativity to duplex DNA and that UvrD1 activation is observed when the DNA substrate is bound with two or three Ku dimers. Our observations reveal aspects of the interactions between DNA, Mtb Ku, and UvrD1 and highlight the potential role of UvrD1 in multiple DNA repair pathways through different mechanisms of activation.

E. coli RecB Nuclease Domain Regulates RecBCD Helicase Activity but not Single Stranded DNA Translocase Activity

Much is still unknown about the mechanisms by which helicases unwind duplex DNA. Whereas structure-based models describe DNA unwinding as occurring by the ATPase motors mechanically pulling the DNA duplex across a wedge domain in the helicase, biochemical data show that processive DNA unwinding by E. coli RecBCD helicase can occur in the absence of ssDNA translocation by the canonical RecB and RecD motors. Here we show that DNA unwinding is not a simple consequence of ssDNA translocation by the motors. Using stopped-flow fluorescence approaches, we show that a RecB nuclease domain deletion variant (RecBΔNucCD) unwinds dsDNA at significantly slower rates than RecBCD, while the ssDNA translocation rate is unaffected. This effect is primarily due to the absence of the nuclease domain since a nuclease-dead mutant (RecBD1080ACD), which retains the nuclease domain, showed no change in ssDNA translocation or dsDNA unwinding rates relative to RecBCD on short DNA substrates (≤60 base pairs). Hence, ssDNA translocation is not rate-limiting for DNA unwinding. RecBΔNucCD also initiates unwinding much slower than RecBCD from a blunt-ended DNA. RecBΔNucCD also unwinds DNA ∼two-fold slower than RecBCD on long DNA (∼20 kilo base pair) in single molecule optical tweezer experiments, although the rates for RecBD1080ACD unwinding are intermediate between RecBCD and RecBΔNucCD. Surprisingly, significant pauses in DNA unwinding occur even in the absence of chi (crossover hotspot instigator) sites. We hypothesize that the nuclease domain influences the rate of DNA base pair melting, possibly allosterically and that RecBΔNucCD may mimic a post-chi state of RecBCD.

E. coli RecBCD Nuclease Domain Regulates Helicase Activity but not Single Stranded DNA Translocase Activity

Much is still unknown about the mechanisms by which helicases unwind duplex DNA. Whereas structure-based models describe DNA unwinding as a consequence of mechanically pulling the DNA duplex across a wedge domain in the helicase by the single stranded (ss)DNA translocase activity of the ATPase motors, biochemical data indicate that processive DNA unwinding by the E. coli RecBCD helicase can occur in the absence of ssDNA translocation of the canonical RecB and RecD motors. Here, we present evidence that dsDNA unwinding is not a simple consequence of ssDNA translocation by the RecBCD motors. Using stopped-flow fluorescence approaches, we show that a RecB nuclease domain deletion variant (RecB ΔNuc CD) unwinds dsDNA at significantly slower rates than RecBCD, while the rate of ssDNA translocation is unaffected. This effect is primarily due to the absence of the nuclease domain and not the absence of the nuclease activity, since a nuclease-dead mutant (RecB D1080A CD), which retains the nuclease domain, showed no significant change in rates of ssDNA translocation or dsDNA unwinding relative to RecBCD on short DNA substrates (≤ 60 base pairs). This indicates that ssDNA translocation is not rate-limiting for DNA unwinding. RecB ΔNuc CD also initiates unwinding much slower than RecBCD from a blunt-ended DNA, although it binds with higher affinity than RecBCD. RecB ΔNuc CD also unwinds DNA ∼two-fold slower than RecBCD on long DNA (∼20 kilo base pair) in single molecule optical tweezer experiments, although the rates for RecB D1080A CD unwinding are intermediate between RecBCD and RecB ΔNuc CD. Surprisingly, significant pauses occur even in the absence of chi (crossover hotspot instigator) sites. We hypothesize that the nuclease domain influences the rate of DNA base pair melting, rather than DNA translocation, possibly allosterically. Since the rate of DNA unwinding by RecBCD also slows after it recognizes a chi sequence, RecB ΔNuc CD may mimic a post- chi state of RecBCD.

"Helicase" Activity promoted through dynamic interactions between a ssDNA translocase and a diffusing SSB protein

Replication protein A (RPA) is a eukaryotic single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding (SSB) protein that is essential for all aspects of genome maintenance. RPA binds ssDNA with high affinity but can also diffuse along ssDNA. By itself, RPA is capable of transiently disrupting short regions of duplex DNA by diffusing from a ssDNA that flanks the duplex DNA. Using single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence and optical trapping combined with fluorescence approaches, we show that S. cerevisiae Pif1 can use its ATP-dependent 5' to 3' translocase activity to chemomechanically push a single human RPA (hRPA) heterotrimer directionally along ssDNA at rates comparable to those of Pif1 translocation alone. We further show that using its translocation activity, Pif1 can push hRPA from a ssDNA loading site into a duplex DNA causing stable disruption of at least 9 bp of duplex DNA. These results highlight the dynamic nature of hRPA enabling it to be readily reorganized even when bound tightly to ssDNA and demonstrate a mechanism by which directional DNA unwinding can be achieved through the combined action of a ssDNA translocase that pushes an SSB protein. These results highlight the two basic requirements for any processive DNA helicase: transient DNA base pair melting (supplied by hRPA) and ATP-dependent directional ssDNA translocation (supplied by Pif1) and that these functions can be unlinked by using two separate proteins.

Macrophage activation highlight an important role for NER proteins in the survival, latency and multiplication of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the most extensively studied DNA repair processes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The NER pathway is a highly conserved, ATP-dependent multi-step process involving several proteins/enzymes that function in a concerted manner to recognize and excise a wide spectrum of helix-distorting DNA lesions and bulky adducts by nuclease cleavage on either side of the damaged bases. As such, the NER pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is essential for its survival within the hostile environment of macrophages and disease progression. This review focuses on present published knowledge about the crucial roles of Mtb NER proteins in the survival and multiplication of the pathogen within the macrophages and as potential targets for drug discovery.

Deletion of rifampicin-inactivating mono-ADP-ribosyl transferase gene of Mycobacterium smegmatis globally altered gene expression profile that favoured increase in ROS levels and thereby antibiotic resister generation

•

Physiological role of mono-ADP-ribosyl transferase (Arr) of Mycobacterium smegmatis revealed.

•

Arr is required to maintain ROS levels in actively growing M. smegmatis.

•

Arr influences gene expression at global level in several pathways.

•

Expression of electron transfer, antioxidation, and DNA repair genes are influenced by Arr.

•

Arr is required to maintain an optimal oxidative and metabolic status.

The physiological role of mono-ADP-ribosyl transferase (Arr) of Mycobacterium smegmatis, which inactivates rifampicin, remains unclear. An earlier study reported increased expression of arr during oxidative stress and DNA damage. This suggested a role for Arr in the oxidative status of the cell and its associated effect on DNA damage. Since reactive oxygen species (ROS) influence oxidative status, we investigated whether Arr affected ROS levels in M. smegmatis. Significantly elevated levels of superoxide and hydroxyl radical were found in the mid-log phase (MLP) cultures of the arr knockout strain (arr-KO) as compared those in the wild-type strain (WT). Complementation of arr-KO with expression from genomically integrated arr under its native promoter restored the levels of ROS equivalent to that in WT. Due to the inherently high ROS levels in the actively growing arr-KO, rifampicin resisters with rpoB mutations could be selected at 0 hr of exposure itself against rifampicin, unlike in the WT where the resisters emerged at 12^th hr of rifampicin exposure. Microarray analysis of the actively growing cultures of arr-KO revealed significantly high levels of expression of genes from succinate dehydrogenase I and NADH dehydrogenase I operons, which would have contributed to the increased superoxide levels. In parallel, expression of specific DNA repair genes was significantly decreased, favouring retention of the mutations inflicted by the ROS. Expression of several metabolic pathway genes also was significantly altered. These observations revealed that Arr was required for maintaining a gene expression profile that would provide optimum levels of ROS and DNA repair system in the actively growing M. smegmatis.