Human shoulder development is adapted to obstetrical constraints

There is an obstetrical dilemma: Misconceptions about the evolution of human childbirth and pelvic form

Compared to other primates, modern humans face high rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality during childbirth. Since the early 20th century, this "difficulty" of human parturition has prompted numerous evolutionary explanations, typically assuming antagonistic selective forces acting on maternal and fetal traits, which has been termed the "obstetrical dilemma." Recently, there has been a growing tendency among some anthropologists to question the difficulty of human childbirth and its evolutionary origin in an antagonistic selective regime. Partly, this stems from the motivation to combat increasing pathologization and overmedicalization of childbirth in industrialized countries. Some authors have argued that there is no obstetrical dilemma at all, and that the difficulty of childbirth mainly results from modern lifestyles and inappropriate and patriarchal obstetric practices. The failure of some studies to identify biomechanical and metabolic constraints on pelvic dimensions is sometimes interpreted as empirical support for discarding an obstetrical dilemma. Here we explain why these points are important but do not invalidate evolutionary explanations of human childbirth. We present robust empirical evidence and solid evolutionary theory supporting an obstetrical dilemma, yet one that is much more complex than originally conceived in the 20th century. We argue that evolutionary research does not hinder appropriate midwifery and obstetric care, nor does it promote negative views of female bodies. Understanding the evolutionary entanglement of biological and sociocultural factors underlying human childbirth can help us to understand individual variation in the risk factors of obstructed labor, and thus can contribute to more individualized maternal care.

Pelvic shape change in adult Japanese macaques and implications for childbirth at old age

Pelvic morphology exhibits a particular sexual dimorphism in humans, which reflects obstetrical constraints due to the tight fit between neonates and mothers. Huseynov et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 5227-5232 (2016)] showed that in humans, pelvic sexual dimorphism is greatest around the age of highest fertility, and it becomes less marked in association with menopause in females. They proposed that this reflects changes of obstetrical versus locomotor functional demands in females. It remains unknown whether such developmental adjustment of the pelvic morphology is unique to humans. Macaques exhibit human-like cephalopelvic proportions, but they lack menopause and usually maintain fertility throughout adulthood. Here, we track pelvic development in Japanese macaques from neonate to advanced ages using computed tomography-based data. We show that female pelvic morphology changes throughout adult life, reaching the obstetrically most favorable shape at advanced ages rather than around primiparity. We hypothesize that pelvic morphology in Japanese macaques is developmentally adjusted to childbirth at advanced ages, where obstetrical risks are potentially higher than at younger ages. Our data contribute to the growing evidence that the female primate pelvis changes its morphology during the whole lifespan, possibly adjusting for changing functional demands during adulthood.