1
|
Cai J, Quan Y, Zhang CY, Wang Z, Hinshaw SM, Zhou H, Suhandynata RT. Concatemer-assisted stoichiometry analysis: targeted mass spectrometry for protein quantification. Life Sci Alliance 2025; 8:e202403007. [PMID: 39741008 PMCID: PMC11707388 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202403007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Revised: 12/06/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Large multiprotein machines are central to many biological processes. However, stoichiometric determination of protein complex subunits in their native states presents a significant challenge. This study addresses the limitations of current tools in accuracy and precision by introducing concatemer-assisted stoichiometry analysis (CASA). CASA leverages stable isotope-labeled concatemers and liquid chromatography-parallel reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (LC-PRM-MS) to achieve robust quantification of proteins with sub-femtomole sensitivity. As a proof of concept, CASA was applied to study budding yeast kinetochores. Stoichiometries were determined for ex vivo reconstituted kinetochore components, including the canonical H3 nucleosomes, centromeric (Cse4CENP-A) nucleosomes, centromere proximal factors (Cbf1 and CBF3 complex), inner kinetochore proteins (Mif2CENP-C, Ctf19CCAN complex), and outer kinetochore proteins (KMN network). Absolute quantification by CASA revealed Cse4CENP-A as a cell cycle-controlled limiting factor for kinetochore assembly. These findings demonstrate that CASA is applicable for stoichiometry analysis of multiprotein assemblies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxi Cai
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Yun Quan
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Cindy Yuxuan Zhang
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Ziyi Wang
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Stephen M Hinshaw
- https://ror.org/00f54p054 Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Huilin Zhou
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Raymond T Suhandynata
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- https://ror.org/0168r3w48 Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim D, Nita-Lazar A. Progress in mass spectrometry approaches to profiling protein-protein interactions in the studies of the innate immune system. JOURNAL OF PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS 2024; 15:545-559. [PMID: 39380887 PMCID: PMC11460538 DOI: 10.1007/s42485-024-00156-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Abstract
Understanding protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is pivotal for deciphering the intricacies of biological processes. Dysregulation of PPIs underlies a spectrum of diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and autoimmune conditions, highlighting the imperative of investigating these interactions for therapeutic advancements. This review delves into the realm of mass spectrometry-based techniques for elucidating PPIs and their profound implications in biological research. Mass spectrometry in the PPI research field not only facilitates the evaluation of protein-protein interaction modulators but also discovers unclear molecular mechanisms and sheds light on both on- and off-target effects, thus aiding in drug development. Our discussion navigates through six pivotal techniques: affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS), proximity labeling mass spectrometry (PL-MS), cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS), size exclusion chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (SEC-MS), limited proteolysis-coupled mass spectrometry (LiP-MS), and thermal proteome profiling (TPP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doeun Kim
- Functional Cellular Networks Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1892, USA
| | - Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
- Functional Cellular Networks Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mannion J, Gifford V, Bellenie B, Fernando W, Ramos Garcia L, Wilson R, John SW, Udainiya S, Patin EC, Tiu C, Smith A, Goicoechea M, Craxton A, Moraes de Vasconcelos N, Guppy N, Cheung KMJ, Cundy NJ, Pierrat O, Brennan A, Roumeliotis TI, Benstead-Hume G, Alexander J, Muirhead G, Layzell S, Lyu W, Roulstone V, Allen M, Baldock H, Legrand A, Gabel F, Serrano-Aparicio N, Starling C, Guo H, Upton J, Gyrd-Hansen M, MacFarlane M, Seddon B, Raynaud F, Roxanis I, Harrington K, Haider S, Choudhary JS, Hoelder S, Tenev T, Meier P. A RIPK1-specific PROTAC degrader achieves potent antitumor activity by enhancing immunogenic cell death. Immunity 2024; 57:1514-1532.e15. [PMID: 38788712 PMCID: PMC11236506 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) functions as a critical stress sentinel that coordinates cell survival, inflammation, and immunogenic cell death (ICD). Although the catalytic function of RIPK1 is required to trigger cell death, its non-catalytic scaffold function mediates strong pro-survival signaling. Accordingly, cancer cells can hijack RIPK1 to block necroptosis and evade immune detection. We generated a small-molecule proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) that selectively degraded human and murine RIPK1. PROTAC-mediated depletion of RIPK1 deregulated TNFR1 and TLR3/4 signaling hubs, accentuating the output of NF-κB, MAPK, and IFN signaling. Additionally, RIPK1 degradation simultaneously promoted RIPK3 activation and necroptosis induction. We further demonstrated that RIPK1 degradation enhanced the immunostimulatory effects of radio- and immunotherapy by sensitizing cancer cells to treatment-induced TNF and interferons. This promoted ICD, antitumor immunity, and durable treatment responses. Consequently, targeting RIPK1 by PROTACs emerges as a promising approach to overcome radio- or immunotherapy resistance and enhance anticancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Mannion
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Valentina Gifford
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Benjamin Bellenie
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Winnie Fernando
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Laura Ramos Garcia
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Rebecca Wilson
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Sidonie Wicky John
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Savita Udainiya
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Emmanuel C Patin
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Crescens Tiu
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Angel Smith
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Maria Goicoechea
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Andrew Craxton
- MRC Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Gleeson Building, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
| | | | - Naomi Guppy
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Kwai-Ming J Cheung
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Nicholas J Cundy
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Olivier Pierrat
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alfie Brennan
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | | | - Graeme Benstead-Hume
- Functional Proteomics Group, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - John Alexander
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Gareth Muirhead
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Scott Layzell
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London NW3 2PP, UK
| | - Wenxin Lyu
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, LEO Foundation Skin Immunology Research Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Victoria Roulstone
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Mark Allen
- Biological Services Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Holly Baldock
- Biological Services Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Arnaud Legrand
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Florian Gabel
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | | | - Chris Starling
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Hongyan Guo
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Jason Upton
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Mads Gyrd-Hansen
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, LEO Foundation Skin Immunology Research Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marion MacFarlane
- MRC Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Gleeson Building, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
| | - Benedict Seddon
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London NW3 2PP, UK
| | - Florence Raynaud
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ioannis Roxanis
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Kevin Harrington
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Syed Haider
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Jyoti S Choudhary
- Functional Proteomics Group, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Swen Hoelder
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery at the Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Tencho Tenev
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
| | - Pascal Meier
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frommelt F, Fossati A, Uliana F, Wendt F, Xue P, Heusel M, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R, Ciuffa R, Gstaiger M. DIP-MS: ultra-deep interaction proteomics for the deconvolution of protein complexes. Nat Methods 2024; 21:635-647. [PMID: 38532014 PMCID: PMC11009110 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02211-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Most proteins are organized in macromolecular assemblies, which represent key functional units regulating and catalyzing most cellular processes. Affinity purification of the protein of interest combined with liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (AP-MS) represents the method of choice to identify interacting proteins. The composition of complex isoforms concurrently present in the AP sample can, however, not be resolved from a single AP-MS experiment but requires computational inference from multiple time- and resource-intensive reciprocal AP-MS experiments. Here we introduce deep interactome profiling by mass spectrometry (DIP-MS), which combines AP with blue-native-PAGE separation, data-independent acquisition with mass spectrometry and deep-learning-based signal processing to resolve complex isoforms sharing the same bait protein in a single experiment. We applied DIP-MS to probe the organization of the human prefoldin family of complexes, resolving distinct prefoldin holo- and subcomplex variants, complex-complex interactions and complex isoforms with new subunits that were experimentally validated. Our results demonstrate that DIP-MS can reveal proteome modularity at unprecedented depth and resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Frommelt
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Andrea Fossati
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Federico Uliana
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Wendt
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), Institute of Translational Medicine (ITM), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peng Xue
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guang Zhou, China
| | - Moritz Heusel
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bernd Wollscheid
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), Institute of Translational Medicine (ITM), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ruedi Aebersold
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rodolfo Ciuffa
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Gstaiger
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Omenn GS, Lane L, Overall CM, Lindskog C, Pineau C, Packer NH, Cristea IM, Weintraub ST, Orchard S, Roehrl MHA, Nice E, Guo T, Van Eyk JE, Liu S, Bandeira N, Aebersold R, Moritz RL, Deutsch EW. The 2023 Report on the Proteome from the HUPO Human Proteome Project. J Proteome Res 2024; 23:532-549. [PMID: 38232391 PMCID: PMC11026053 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Since 2010, the Human Proteome Project (HPP), the flagship initiative of the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO), has pursued two goals: (1) to credibly identify the protein parts list and (2) to make proteomics an integral part of multiomics studies of human health and disease. The HPP relies on international collaboration, data sharing, standardized reanalysis of MS data sets by PeptideAtlas and MassIVE-KB using HPP Guidelines for quality assurance, integration and curation of MS and non-MS protein data by neXtProt, plus extensive use of antibody profiling carried out by the Human Protein Atlas. According to the neXtProt release 2023-04-18, protein expression has now been credibly detected (PE1) for 18,397 of the 19,778 neXtProt predicted proteins coded in the human genome (93%). Of these PE1 proteins, 17,453 were detected with mass spectrometry (MS) in accordance with HPP Guidelines and 944 by a variety of non-MS methods. The number of neXtProt PE2, PE3, and PE4 missing proteins now stands at 1381. Achieving the unambiguous identification of 93% of predicted proteins encoded from across all chromosomes represents remarkable experimental progress on the Human Proteome parts list. Meanwhile, there are several categories of predicted proteins that have proved resistant to detection regardless of protein-based methods used. Additionally there are some PE1-4 proteins that probably should be reclassified to PE5, specifically 21 LINC entries and ∼30 HERV entries; these are being addressed in the present year. Applying proteomics in a wide array of biological and clinical studies ensures integration with other omics platforms as reported by the Biology and Disease-driven HPP teams and the antibody and pathology resource pillars. Current progress has positioned the HPP to transition to its Grand Challenge Project focused on determining the primary function(s) of every protein itself and in networks and pathways within the context of human health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilbert S. Omenn
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
| | - Lydie Lane
- CALIPHO Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and University of Geneva, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christopher M. Overall
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada, Yonsei University Republic of Korea
| | | | - Charles Pineau
- University Rennes, Inserm U1085, Irset, 35042 Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Susan T. Weintraub
- University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, United States
| | | | - Michael H. A. Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | | | - Tiannan Guo
- Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310024, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jennifer E. Van Eyk
- Advanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 South San Vicente Boulevard, Pavilion, 9th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, United States
| | - Siqi Liu
- BGI Group, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Nuno Bandeira
- University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States
| | - Ruedi Aebersold
- Institute of Molecular Systems Biology in ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert L. Moritz
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
| | - Eric W. Deutsch
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clucas J, Meier P. Roles of RIPK1 as a stress sentinel coordinating cell survival and immunogenic cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2023; 24:835-852. [PMID: 37568036 DOI: 10.1038/s41580-023-00623-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
Cell death and inflammation are closely linked arms of the innate immune response to combat infection and tissue malfunction. Recent advancements in our understanding of the intricate signals originating from dying cells have revealed that cell death serves as more than just an end point. It facilitates the exchange of information between the dying cell and cells of the tissue microenvironment, particularly immune cells, alerting and recruiting them to the site of disturbance. Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) is emerging as a critical stress sentinel that functions as a molecular switch, governing cellular survival, inflammatory responses and immunogenic cell death signalling. Its tight regulation involves multiple layers of post-translational modifications. In this Review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms that regulate RIPK1 to maintain homeostasis and cellular survival in healthy cells, yet drive cell death in a context-dependent manner. We address how RIPK1 mutations or aberrant regulation is associated with inflammatory and autoimmune disorders and cancer. Moreover, we tease apart what is known about catalytic and non-catalytic roles of RIPK1 and discuss the successes and pitfalls of current strategies that aim to target RIPK1 in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarama Clucas
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Pascal Meier
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Understanding How Cells Probe the World: A Preliminary Step towards Modeling Cell Behavior? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032266. [PMID: 36768586 PMCID: PMC9916635 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cell biologists have long aimed at quantitatively modeling cell function. Recently, the outstanding progress of high-throughput measurement methods and data processing tools has made this a realistic goal. The aim of this paper is twofold: First, to suggest that, while much progress has been done in modeling cell states and transitions, current accounts of environmental cues driving these transitions remain insufficient. There is a need to provide an integrated view of the biochemical, topographical and mechanical information processed by cells to take decisions. It might be rewarding in the near future to try to connect cell environmental cues to physiologically relevant outcomes rather than modeling relationships between these cues and internal signaling networks. The second aim of this paper is to review exogenous signals that are sensed by living cells and significantly influence fate decisions. Indeed, in addition to the composition of the surrounding medium, cells are highly sensitive to the properties of neighboring surfaces, including the spatial organization of anchored molecules and substrate mechanical and topographical properties. These properties should thus be included in models of cell behavior. It is also suggested that attempts at cell modeling could strongly benefit from two research lines: (i) trying to decipher the way cells encode the information they retrieve from environment analysis, and (ii) developing more standardized means of assessing the quality of proposed models, as was done in other research domains such as protein structure prediction.
Collapse
|