1
|
Kalbfleisch TS, McKay SD, Murdoch BM, Adelson DL, Almansa-Villa D, Becker G, Beckett LM, Benítez-Galeano MJ, Biase F, Casey T, Chuong E, Clark E, Clarke S, Cockett N, Couldrey C, Davis BW, Elsik CG, Faraut T, Gao Y, Genet C, Grady P, Green J, Green R, Guan D, Hagen D, Hartley GA, Heaton M, Hoyt SJ, Huang W, Jarvis E, Kalleberg J, Khatib H, Koepfi KP, Koltes J, Koren S, Kuehn C, Leeb T, Leonard A, Liu GE, Low WY, McConnell H, McRae K, Miga K, Mousel M, Neibergs H, Olagunju T, Pennell M, Petry B, Pewsner M, Phillippy AM, Pickett BD, Pineda P, Potapova T, Rachagani S, Rhie A, Rijnkels M, Robic A, Rodriguez Osorio N, Safonova Y, Schettini G, Schnabel RD, Sirpu Natesh N, Stegemiller M, Storer J, Stothard P, Stull C, Tosser-Klopp G, Traglia GM, Tuggle CK, Van Tassell CP, Watson C, Weikard R, Wimmers K, Xie S, Yang L, Smith TPL, O'Neill RJ, Rosen BD. The Ruminant Telomere-to-Telomere (RT2T) Consortium. Nat Genet 2024:10.1038/s41588-024-01835-2. [PMID: 39103649 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01835-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assemblies reveal new insights into the structure and function of the previously 'invisible' parts of the genome and allow comparative analyses of complete genomes across entire clades. We present here an open collaborative effort, termed the 'Ruminant T2T Consortium' (RT2T), that aims to generate complete diploid assemblies for numerous species of the Artiodactyla suborder Ruminantia to examine chromosomal evolution in the context of natural selection and domestication of species used as livestock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie D McKay
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Brenda M Murdoch
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - David L Adelson
- School of Biological Sciences, the University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Diego Almansa-Villa
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | - Gabrielle Becker
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Linda M Beckett
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - María José Benítez-Galeano
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | - Fernando Biase
- School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Theresa Casey
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Edward Chuong
- BioFrontiers Institute, Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Emily Clark
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shannon Clarke
- Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd, Mosgiel, New Zealand
| | - Noelle Cockett
- Department of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
| | | | - Brian W Davis
- Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Christine G Elsik
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Thomas Faraut
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Yahui Gao
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Carine Genet
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Patrick Grady
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Jonathan Green
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Richard Green
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Darren Hagen
- Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
| | | | - Mike Heaton
- U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA ARS, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | - Savannah J Hoyt
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Wen Huang
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Erich Jarvis
- Vertebrate Genome Laboratory, the Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Jenna Kalleberg
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Hasan Khatib
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Klaus-Peter Koepfi
- Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, George Mason University, Front Royal, VA, USA
- Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA
| | - James Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Sergey Koren
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christa Kuehn
- Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute (German Federal Research Institute for Animal Health), Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Tosso Leeb
- Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Wai Yee Low
- The Davies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hunter McConnell
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Kathryn McRae
- Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd, Mosgiel, New Zealand
| | - Karen Miga
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Michelle Mousel
- Animal Disease Research Unit, USDA ARS, Pullman, WA, USA
- School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Holly Neibergs
- Department of Animal Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Temitayo Olagunju
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Matt Pennell
- Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bruna Petry
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Mirjam Pewsner
- Institute of Fish and Wildlife Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adam M Phillippy
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brandon D Pickett
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paulene Pineda
- The Davies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tamara Potapova
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Satyanarayana Rachagani
- Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, NextGen Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Arang Rhie
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Monique Rijnkels
- Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Annie Robic
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Nelida Rodriguez Osorio
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | - Yana Safonova
- Computer Science and Engineering Department, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Gustavo Schettini
- School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Robert D Schnabel
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | | - Morgan Stegemiller
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Jessica Storer
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Paul Stothard
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Caleb Stull
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | | - Germán M Traglia
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | | | | | - Corey Watson
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Rosemarie Weikard
- Institute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Klaus Wimmers
- Institute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Shangqian Xie
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Liu Yang
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | | | - Rachel J O'Neill
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergman S, Tuller T. Strong association between genomic 3D structure and CRISPR cleavage efficiency. PLoS Comput Biol 2024; 20:e1012214. [PMID: 38848440 PMCID: PMC11189236 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
CRISPR is a gene editing technology which enables precise in-vivo genome editing; but its potential is hampered by its relatively low specificity and sensitivity. Improving CRISPR's on-target and off-target effects requires a better understanding of its mechanism and determinants. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, the chromosomal 3D spatial structure's association with CRISPR's cleavage efficiency, and its predictive capabilities. We used high-resolution Hi-C data to estimate the 3D distance between different regions in the human genome and utilized these spatial properties to generate 3D-based features, characterizing each region's density. We evaluated these features based on empirical, in-vivo CRISPR efficiency data and compared them to 425 features used in state-of-the-art models. The 3D features ranked in the top 13% of the features, and significantly improved the predictive power of LASSO and xgboost models trained with these features. The features indicated that sites with lower spatial density demonstrated higher efficiency. Understanding how CRISPR is affected by the 3D DNA structure provides insight into CRISPR's mechanism in general and improves our ability to correctly predict CRISPR's cleavage as well as design sgRNAs for therapeutic and scientific use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaked Bergman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamir Tuller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- The Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jehangir M, Ahmad SF, Singchat W, Panthum T, Thong T, Aramsirirujiwet P, Lisachov A, Muangmai N, Han K, Koga A, Duengkae P, Srikulnath K. Hi-C sequencing unravels dynamic three-dimensional chromatin interactions in muntjac lineage: insights from chromosome fusions in Fea's muntjac genome. Chromosome Res 2023; 31:34. [PMID: 38017297 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-023-09744-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Eukaryotes have varying numbers and structures of characteristic chromosomes across lineages or species. The evolutionary trajectory of species may have been affected by spontaneous genome rearrangements. Chromosome fusion drastically alters karyotypes. However, the mechanisms and consequences of chromosome fusions, particularly in muntjac species, are poorly understood. Recent research-based advancements in three-dimensional (3D) genomics, particularly high-throughput chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) sequencing, have allowed for the identification of chromosome fusions and provided mechanistic insights into three muntjac species: Muntiacus muntjak, M. reevesi, and M. crinifrons. This study aimed to uncover potential genome rearrangement patterns in the threatened species Fea's muntjac (Muntiacus feae), which have not been previously examined for such characteristics. Deep Hi-C sequencing (31.42 × coverage) was performed to reveal the 3D chromatin architecture of the Fea's muntjac genome. Patterns of repeated chromosome fusions that were potentially mediated by high-abundance transposable elements were identified. Comparative Hi-C maps demonstrated linkage homology between the sex chromosomes in Fea's muntjac and autosomes in M. reevesi, indicating that fusions may have played a crucial role in the evolution of the sex chromosomes of the lineage. The species-level dynamics of topologically associated domains (TADs) suggest that TAD organization could be altered by differential chromosome interactions owing to repeated chromosome fusions. However, research on the effect of TADs on muntjac genome evolution is insufficient. This study generated Hi-C data for the Fea's muntjac, providing a genomic resource for future investigations of the evolutionary patterns of chromatin conformation at the chromosomal level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Jehangir
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Syed Farhan Ahmad
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
- Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
- The International Undergraduate Program in Bioscience and Technology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
| | - Worapong Singchat
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
- Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Thitipong Panthum
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
- Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Thanyapat Thong
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Pakpoom Aramsirirujiwet
- Deparment of National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Artem Lisachov
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Narongrit Muangmai
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
- Department of Fishery Biology, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Kyudong Han
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
- Department of Microbiology, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Korea
- Bio-Medical Engineering Core Facility Research Center, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Korea
| | - Akihiko Koga
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Prateep Duengkae
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
- Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| | - Kornsorn Srikulnath
- Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
- Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
- The International Undergraduate Program in Bioscience and Technology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
- Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arias-Sardá C, Quigley S, Farré M. Patterns of chromosome evolution in ruminants. Mol Ecol 2023. [PMID: 37937367 DOI: 10.1111/mec.17197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Studying when and where gross genomic rearrangements occurred during evolution is key to understanding changes in genome structure with functional consequences that might eventually lead to speciation. Here we identified chromosome rearrangements in ruminants, a clade characterized by large chromosome differences. Using 26 genome assemblies, we reconstructed five ancestral karyotypes and classified the rearrangement events occurring in each lineage. With these reconstructions, we then identified evolutionary breakpoints regions (EBRs) and synteny fragments. Ruminant karyotype evolution is characterized by inversions, while interchromosomal rearrangements occurred preferentially in the oldest ancestor of ruminants. We found that EBRs are depleted of protein coding genes, including housekeeping genes. Similarly, EBRs are not enriched in high GC regions, suggesting that meiotic double strand breaks might not be their origin. Overall, our results characterize at fine detail the location of chromosome rearrangements in ruminant evolution and provide new insights into the formation of EBRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Quigley
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Marta Farré
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lainscsek X, Taher L. Predicting chromosomal compartments directly from the nucleotide sequence with DNA-DDA. Brief Bioinform 2023; 24:bbad198. [PMID: 37264486 PMCID: PMC10359093 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) genome architecture is characterized by multi-scale patterns and plays an essential role in gene regulation. Chromatin conformation capturing experiments have revealed many properties underlying 3D genome architecture, such as the compartmentalization of chromatin based on transcriptional states. However, they are complex, costly and time consuming, and therefore only a limited number of cell types have been examined using these techniques. Increasing effort is being directed towards deriving computational methods that can predict chromatin conformation and associated structures. Here we present DNA-delay differential analysis (DDA), a purely sequence-based method based on chaos theory to predict genome-wide A and B compartments. We show that DNA-DDA models derived from a 20 Mb sequence are sufficient to predict genome wide compartmentalization at the scale of 100 kb in four different cell types. Although this is a proof-of-concept study, our method shows promise in elucidating the mechanisms responsible for genome folding as well as modeling the impact of genetic variation on 3D genome architecture and the processes regulated thereby.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xenia Lainscsek
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Graz University of Technology, Austria
| | - Leila Taher
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Graz University of Technology, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li X, Wang J, Yu Y, Li G, Wang J, Li C, Zeng Z, Li N, Zhang Z, Dong Q, Yu Y, Wang X, Wang T, Grover CE, Wang B, Liu B, Wendel JF, Gong L. Genomic rearrangements and evolutionary changes in 3D chromatin topologies in the cotton tribe (Gossypieae). BMC Biol 2023; 21:56. [PMID: 36941615 PMCID: PMC10029228 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01560-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analysis of the relationship between chromosomal structural variation (synteny breaks) and 3D-chromatin architectural changes among closely related species has the potential to reveal causes and correlates between chromosomal change and chromatin remodeling. Of note, contrary to extensive studies in animal species, the pace and pattern of chromatin architectural changes following the speciation of plants remain unexplored; moreover, there is little exploration of the occurrence of synteny breaks in the context of multiple genome topological hierarchies within the same model species. RESULTS Here we used Hi-C and epigenomic analyses to characterize and compare the profiles of hierarchical chromatin architectural features in representative species of the cotton tribe (Gossypieae), including Gossypium arboreum, Gossypium raimondii, and Gossypioides kirkii, which differ with respect to chromosome rearrangements. We found that (i) overall chromatin architectural territories were preserved in Gossypioides and Gossypium, which was reflected in their similar intra-chromosomal contact patterns and spatial chromosomal distributions; (ii) the non-random preferential occurrence of synteny breaks in A compartment significantly associate with the B-to-A compartment switch in syntenic blocks flanking synteny breaks; (iii) synteny changes co-localize with open-chromatin boundaries of topologically associating domains, while TAD stabilization has a greater influence on regulating orthologous expression divergence than do rearrangements; and (iv) rearranged chromosome segments largely maintain ancestral in-cis interactions. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide insights into the non-random occurrence of epigenomic remodeling relative to the genomic landscape and its evolutionary and functional connections to alterations of hierarchical chromatin architecture, on a known evolutionary timescale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaochong Li
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Jinbin Wang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Yanan Yu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Guo Li
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Jinpeng Wang
- School of Life Sciences, and Center for Genomics and Computational Biology, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, 063000, Hebei, China
| | - Changping Li
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Zixian Zeng
- Department of Biological Science, College of Life Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610101, China
| | - Ning Li
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Zhibin Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Qianli Dong
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Yiyang Yu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Xiaofei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Lab, Sanya, 572025, Hainan, China
| | - Tianya Wang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Corrinne E Grover
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Bin Wang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China
| | - Bao Liu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
| | - Jonathan F Wendel
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
| | - Lei Gong
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Álvarez-González L, Arias-Sardá C, Montes-Espuña L, Marín-Gual L, Vara C, Lister NC, Cuartero Y, Garcia F, Deakin J, Renfree MB, Robinson TJ, Martí-Renom MA, Waters PD, Farré M, Ruiz-Herrera A. Principles of 3D chromosome folding and evolutionary genome reshuffling in mammals. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111839. [PMID: 36543130 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Studying the similarities and differences in genomic interactions between species provides fertile grounds for determining the evolutionary dynamics underpinning genome function and speciation. Here, we describe the principles of 3D genome folding in vertebrates and show how lineage-specific patterns of genome reshuffling can result in different chromatin configurations. We (1) identified different patterns of chromosome folding in across vertebrate species (centromere clustering versus chromosomal territories); (2) reconstructed ancestral marsupial and afrotherian genomes analyzing whole-genome sequences of species representative of the major therian phylogroups; (3) detected lineage-specific chromosome rearrangements; and (4) identified the dynamics of the structural properties of genome reshuffling through therian evolution. We present evidence of chromatin configurational changes that result from ancestral inversions and fusions/fissions. We catalog the close interplay between chromatin higher-order organization and therian genome evolution and introduce an interpretative hypothesis that explains how chromatin folding influences evolutionary patterns of genome reshuffling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucía Álvarez-González
- Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Genome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | | | - Laia Montes-Espuña
- Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Genome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Laia Marín-Gual
- Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Genome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Covadonga Vara
- Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Genome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Nicholas C Lister
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Yasmina Cuartero
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisca Garcia
- Servei de Cultius Cel.lulars-SCAC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Janine Deakin
- Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
| | - Marilyn B Renfree
- School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Terence J Robinson
- Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa
| | - Marc A Martí-Renom
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; Centre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Carrer del Doctor Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul D Waters
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Marta Farré
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK
| | - Aurora Ruiz-Herrera
- Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Genome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Armstrong EE, Campana MG, Solari KA, Morgan SR, Ryder OA, Naude VN, Samelius G, Sharma K, Hadly EA, Petrov DA. Genome report: chromosome-level draft assemblies of the snow leopard, African leopard, and tiger (Panthera uncia, Panthera pardus pardus, and Panthera tigris). G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2022; 12:jkac277. [PMID: 36250809 PMCID: PMC9713438 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
The big cats (genus Panthera) represent some of the most popular and charismatic species on the planet. Although some reference genomes are available for this clade, few are at the chromosome level, inhibiting high-resolution genomic studies. We assembled genomes from 3 members of the genus, the tiger (Panthera tigris), the snow leopard (Panthera uncia), and the African leopard (Panthera pardus pardus), at chromosome or near-chromosome level. We used a combination of short- and long-read technologies, as well as proximity ligation data from Hi-C technology, to achieve high continuity and contiguity for each individual. We hope that these genomes will aid in further evolutionary and conservation research of this iconic group of mammals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie E Armstrong
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
| | - Michael G Campana
- Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian’s National Zoological Park and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008, USA
| | | | - Simon R Morgan
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Wildlife ACT Fund Trust, Cape Town 8001, South Africa
| | - Oliver A Ryder
- San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Beckman Center for Conservation Research, San Diego, CA 92027, USA
| | - Vincent N Naude
- Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa
- School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
| | | | - Koustubh Sharma
- Snow Leopard Trust, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
- Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore 570 017, India
| | | | - Dmitri A Petrov
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Computational reconstruction of ancestral mammalian karyotypes revealed a comprehensive picture of the chromosome rearrangements that occurred over the evolutionary history of mammals. Ancient gene order, in some cases extending to full chromosomes, was found conserved for more than 300 My, demonstrating strong evolutionary constraint against rearrangements in some regions. Conserved segments of chromosomes are enriched for genes that control developmental processes. Therefore, Darwinian selection likely maintains ancient gene combinations while allowing for genomic innovations within or near chromosomal sites that break and rearrange over evolutionary time. The revealed relationship between the three-dimensional structure of chromosomes and the evolutionary stability of chromosome segments provides additional insights into the mechanisms of chromosome evolution and diseases associated with genome rearrangements. Decrypting the rearrangements that drive mammalian chromosome evolution is critical to understanding the molecular bases of speciation, adaptation, and disease susceptibility. Using 8 scaffolded and 26 chromosome-scale genome assemblies representing 23/26 mammal orders, we computationally reconstructed ancestral karyotypes and syntenic relationships at 16 nodes along the mammalian phylogeny. Three different reference genomes (human, sloth, and cattle) representing phylogenetically distinct mammalian superorders were used to assess reference bias in the reconstructed ancestral karyotypes and to expand the number of clades with reconstructed genomes. The mammalian ancestor likely had 19 pairs of autosomes, with nine of the smallest chromosomes shared with the common ancestor of all amniotes (three still conserved in extant mammals), demonstrating a striking conservation of synteny for ∼320 My of vertebrate evolution. The numbers and types of chromosome rearrangements were classified for transitions between the ancestral mammalian karyotype, descendent ancestors, and extant species. For example, 94 inversions, 16 fissions, and 14 fusions that occurred over 53 My differentiated the therian from the descendent eutherian ancestor. The highest breakpoint rate was observed between the mammalian and therian ancestors (3.9 breakpoints/My). Reconstructed mammalian ancestor chromosomes were found to have distinct evolutionary histories reflected in their rates and types of rearrangements. The distributions of genes, repetitive elements, topologically associating domains, and actively transcribed regions in multispecies homologous synteny blocks and evolutionary breakpoint regions indicate that purifying selection acted over millions of years of vertebrate evolution to maintain syntenic relationships of developmentally important genes and regulatory landscapes of gene-dense chromosomes.
Collapse
|