Natural selection has driven the recurrent loss of an immunity gene that protects Drosophila against a major natural parasite

Encapsulation and Melanization Are Not Correlated to Successful Immune Defense Against Parasitoid Wasps in Drosophila melanogaster

Parasitoid elimination in Drosophila melanogaster involves special hemocytes, called lamellocytes, which encapsulate the eggs or larvae of the parasitoid wasps. The capsules are melanized, and metabolites of the melanization reaction may play a potential role in parasitoid killing. We have observed a variation in the melanization capacity of different, commonly used D. melanogaster strains, such as Canton-S, Oregon-R, and BL5905, BL6326. In this work, we aimed to clarify a possible connection between the effectiveness of capsule melanization and the success of parasitoid elimination following infection with Leptopilina parasitoid wasps. Circulating hemocytes and lamellocyte attachment were visualized by confocal and epifluorescence microscopy using indirect immunofluorescence. Expression profiles of the PPO2 and PPO3 prophenoloxidase genes, which encode key enzymes in the melanization reaction, were detected by qRT-PCR. Parasitization assays were used to analyze fly and wasp eclosion success. Active encapsulation and melanization reactions against Leptopilina boulardi were observed in the BL5905 and the BL6326 strains, though restricted to the dead supernumerary parasitoids, while fly and wasp eclosion rates were essentially the same in the four examined D. melanogaster strains. We conclude that encapsulation and melanization carried out by D. melanogaster following L. boulardi infection have no impact on survival.

Experimental horizontal transfer of phage-derived genes to Drosophila confers innate immunity to parasitoids

Metazoan parasites have played a major role in shaping innate immunity in animals. Insect hosts and parasitoid wasps are excellent models for illuminating how animal innate immune systems have evolved to neutralize these enemies. One such strategy relies on symbioses between insects and intracellular bacteria that express phage-encoded toxins. In some cases, the genes that encode these toxins have been horizontally transferred to the genomes of the insects. Here, we used genome editing in Drosophila melanogaster to recapitulate the evolution of two toxin genes-cytolethal distending toxin B (cdtB) and apoptosis inducing protein of 56kDa (aip56)-that were horizontally transferred likely from phages of endosymbiotic bacteria to insects millions of years ago. We found that a cdtB::aip56 fusion gene (fusionB), which is conserved in D. ananassae subgroup species, dramatically promoted fly survival and suppressed parasitoid wasp development when heterologously expressed in D. melanogaster immune tissues. We found that FusionB was a functional nuclease and was secreted into the host hemolymph where it targeted the parasitoid embryo's serosal tissue. Although the mechanism of toxicity remains unknown, when expressed ubiquitously, fusionB resulted in delayed development of late-stage fly larvae and eventually killed pupating flies. These results point to the salience of regulatory constraint in mitigating autoimmunity during the domestication process following horizontal transfer. Our findings demonstrate how horizontal gene transfer can instantly provide new, potent innate immune modules in animals.

MdSVWC1, a new pattern recognition receptor triggers multiple defense mechanisms against invading bacteria in Musca domestica

BACKGROUND

Single-domain von Willebrand factor type C (SVWC) constitute a protein family predominantly identified in arthropods, characterized by a SVWC domain and involved in diverse physiological processes such as host defense, stress resistance, and nutrient metabolism. Nevertheless, the physiological mechanisms underlying these functions remain inadequately comprehended.

RESULTS

A massive expansion of the SVWC gene family in Musca domestica (MdSVWC) was discovered, with a count of 35. MdSVWC1 was selected as the representative of the SVWC family for functional analysis, which led to the identification of the immune function of MdSVWC1 as a novel pattern recognition receptor. MdSVWC1 is highly expressed in both the fat body and intestines and displays acute induction upon bacterial infection. Recombinant MdSVWC1 binds to surfaces of both bacteria and yeast through the recognition of multiple pathogen-associated molecular patterns and exhibits Ca2+-dependent agglutination activity. MdSVWC1 mutant flies exhibited elevated mortality and hindered bacterial elimination following bacterial infection as a result of reduced hemocyte phagocytic capability and weakened expression of antimicrobial peptide (AMP) genes. In contrast, administration of recombinant MdSVWC1 provided protection to flies from bacterial challenges by promoting phagocytosis and AMP genes expression, thereby preventing bacterial colonization. MdSPN16, a serine protease inhibitor, was identified as a target protein of MdSVWC1. It was postulated that the interaction of MdSVWC1 with MdSPN16 would result in the activation of an extracellular proteolytic cascade, which would then initiate the Toll signaling pathway and facilitate the expression of AMP genes.

CONCLUSIONS

MdSVWC1 displays activity as a soluble pattern recognition receptor that regulates cellular and humoral immunity by recognizing microbial components and facilitating host defense.

The evolution of constitutively active humoral immune defenses in Drosophila populations under high parasite pressure

Both constitutive and inducible immune mechanisms are employed by hosts for defense against infection. Constitutive immunity allows for a faster response, but it comes with an associated cost that is always present. This trade-off between speed and fitness costs leads to the theoretical prediction that constitutive immunity will be favored where parasite exposure is frequent. We selected populations of Drosophila melanogaster under high parasite pressure from the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi. With RNA sequencing, we found the evolution of resistance in these populations was associated with them developing constitutively active humoral immunity, mediated by the larval fat body. Furthermore, these evolved populations were also able to induce gene expression in response to infection to a greater level, which indicates an overall more activated humoral immune response to parasitization. The anti-parasitoid immune response also relies on the JAK/STAT signaling pathway being activated in muscles following infection, and this induced response was only seen in populations that had evolved under high parasite pressure. We found that the cytokine Upd3, which induces this JAK/STAT response, is being expressed by immature lamellocytes. Furthermore, these immune cells became constitutively present when populations evolved resistance, potentially explaining why they gained the ability to activate JAK/STAT signaling. Thus, under intense parasitism, populations evolved resistance by increasing both constitutive and induced immune defenses, and there is likely an interplay between these two forms of immunity.

Activation of immune defences against parasitoid wasps does not underlie the cost of infection

Parasites reduce the fitness of their hosts, and different causes of this damage have fundamentally different consequences for the evolution of immune defences. Damage to the host may result from the parasite directly harming its host, often due to the production of virulence factors that manipulate host physiology. Alternatively, the host may be harmed by the activation of its own immune defences, as these can be energetically demanding or cause self-harm. A well-studied model of the cost of infection is Drosophila melanogaster and its common natural enemy, parasitoid wasps. Infected Drosophila larvae rely on humoral and cellular immune mechanisms to form a capsule around the parasitoid egg and kill it. Infection results in a developmental delay and reduced adult body size. To disentangle the effects of virulence factors and immune defences on these costs, we artificially activated anti-parasitoid immune defences in the absence of virulence factors. Despite immune activation triggering extensive differentiation and proliferation of immune cells together with hyperglycaemia, it did not result in a developmental delay or reduced body size. We conclude that the costs of infection do not result from these aspects of the immune response and may instead result from the parasite directly damaging the host.