Intermediates in V(D)J recombination: a stable RAG1/2 complex sequesters cleaved RSS ends

Temporally uncoupled signal and coding joint formation in human V(D)J recombination

In vertebrate antigen receptor gene rearrangement, V(D)J recombination events can occur by deletion or by inversion. For deletional events, the signal joint is deleted from the genome. Nearly half of the immunoglobulin light chain genes undergo V(D)J recombination in an inversional manner, and both signal and coding joint formation must occur to retain chromosomal integrity. But given the undetermined amount of pre-B and pre-T cell death that occurs during V(D)J recombination, the efficiency with which both joints are completed is not known, nor is the relative efficiency (balance) of signal versus coding joint formation. Signal joint formation only requires Ku and XRCC4:DNA ligase 4 of the nonhomologous DNA end joining repair pathway. Coding joint formation requires these proteins as well, but in addition requires Artemis and DNA-dependent protein kinase to open the hairpin DNA coding ends, which the RAG complex generated; and further processing is required because the hairpin opening generates incompatible 3' overhangs. Mutations in some of the end processing enzymes affect one, but only minimally the other joint. We have devised a precise cellular assay that does not have any cellular, enzymatic or biochemical selective bias to assess signal and coding joint formation independently, and it can detect intermediates for which one joint has formed but not the other. We find that intermediates with only one completed joint are more abundant than molecules with both joints completed. This indicates that either joint can form independent of the other and joint formation can be a relatively slow process.

The ATM Kinase Restrains Joining of Both VDJ Signal and Coding Ends

The evidence that ATM affects resolution of RAG-induced DNA double-strand breaks is profuse and unequivocal; moreover, it is clear that the RAG complex itself cooperates (in an undetermined way) with ATM to facilitate repair of these double-strand breaks by the classical nonhomologous end-joining pathway. The mechanistic basis for the cooperation between ATM and the RAG complex has not been defined, although proposed models invoke ATM and RAG2's C terminus in maintaining the RAG postcleavage complex. In this study, we show that ATM reduces the rate of both coding and signal joining in a robust episomal assay; we suggest that this is the result of increased stability of the postcleavage complex. ATM's ability to inhibit VDJ joining requires its enzymatic activity. The noncore C termini of both RAG1 and RAG2 are also required for ATM's capacity to limit signal (but not coding) joining. Moreover, potential phosphorylation targets within the C terminus of RAG2 are also required for ATM's capacity to limit signal joining. These data suggest a model whereby the RAG signal end complex is stabilized by phosphorylation of RAG2 by ATM.

Restoration of ATM Expression in DNA-PKcs-Deficient Cells Inhibits Signal End Joining

Unlike most DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs)-deficient mouse cell strains, we show in the present study that targeted deletion of DNA-PKcs in two different human cell lines abrogates VDJ signal end joining in episomal assays. Although the mechanism is not well defined, DNA-PKcs deficiency results in spontaneous reduction of ATM expression in many cultured cell lines (including those examined in this study) and in DNA-PKcs-deficient mice. We considered that varying loss of ATM expression might explain differences in signal end joining in different cell strains and animal models, and we investigated the impact of ATM and/or DNA-PKcs loss on VDJ recombination in cultured human and rodent cell strains. To our surprise, in DNA-PKcs-deficient mouse cell strains that are proficient in signal end joining, restoration of ATM expression markedly inhibits signal end joining. In contrast, in DNA-PKcs-deficient cells that are deficient in signal end joining, complete loss of ATM enhances signal (but not coding) joint formation. We propose that ATM facilitates restriction of signal ends to the classical nonhomologous end-joining pathway.

Regulation and Evolution of the RAG Recombinase

The modular, noncontiguous architecture of the antigen receptor genes necessitates their assembly through V(D)J recombination. This program of DNA breakage and rejoining occurs during early lymphocyte development, and depends on the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, whose collaborative endonuclease activity targets specific DNA motifs enriched in the antigen receptor loci. This essential gene shuffling reaction requires lymphocytes to traverse several developmental stages wherein DNA breakage is tolerated, while minimizing the expense to overall genome integrity. Thus, RAG activity is subject to stringent temporal and spatial regulation. The RAG proteins themselves also contribute autoregulatory properties that coordinate their DNA cleavage activity with target chromatin structure, cell cycle status, and DNA repair pathways. Even so, lapses in regulatory restriction of RAG activity are apparent in the aberrant V(D)J recombination events that underlie many lymphomas. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the RAG endonuclease, its widespread binding in the lymphocyte genome, its noncleavage activities that restrain its enzymatic potential, and the growing evidence of its evolution from an ancient transposase.

Assembly Pathway and Characterization of the RAG1/2-DNA Paired and Signal-end Complexes

Mammalian immune receptor diversity is established via a unique restricted set of site-specific DNA rearrangements in lymphoid cells, known as V(D)J recombination. The lymphoid-specific RAG1-RAG2 protein complex (RAG1/2) initiates this process by binding to two types of recombination signal sequences (RSS), 12RSS and 23RSS, and cleaving at the boundaries of RSS and V, D, or J gene segments, which are to be assembled into immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors. Here we dissect the ordered assembly of the RAG1/2 heterotetramer with 12RSS and 23RSS DNAs. We find that RAG1/2 binds only a single 12RSS or 23RSS and reserves the second DNA-binding site specifically for the complementary RSS, to form a paired complex that reflects the known 12/23 rule of V(D)J recombination. The assembled RAG1/2 paired complex is active in the presence of Mg(2+), the physiologically relevant metal ion, in nicking and double-strand cleavage of both RSS DNAs to produce a signal-end complex. We report here the purification and initial crystallization of the RAG1/2 signal-end complex for atomic-resolution structure elucidation. Strict pairing of the 12RSS and 23RSS at the binding step, together with information from the crystal structure of RAG1/2, leads to a molecular explanation of the 12/23 rule.

Crystal structure of the V(D)J recombinase RAG1-RAG2

V(D)J recombination in the vertebrate immune system generates a highly diverse population of immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors by combinatorial joining of segments of coding DNA. The RAG1-RAG2 protein complex initiates this site-specific recombination by cutting DNA at specific sites flanking the coding segments. Here we report the crystal structure of the mouse RAG1-RAG2 complex at 3.2 Å resolution. The 230-kilodalton RAG1-RAG2 heterotetramer is 'Y-shaped', with the amino-terminal domains of the two RAG1 chains forming an intertwined stalk. Each RAG1-RAG2 heterodimer composes one arm of the 'Y', with the active site in the middle and RAG2 at its tip. The RAG1-RAG2 structure rationalizes more than 60 mutations identified in immunodeficient patients, as well as a large body of genetic and biochemical data. The architectural similarity between RAG1 and the hairpin-forming transposases Hermes and Tn5 suggests the evolutionary conservation of these DNA rearrangements.

A hypomorphic recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) mutation resulting in a phenotype resembling common variable immunodeficiency

BACKGROUND

Recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) deficiency presents with a varied spectrum of combined immunodeficiency, ranging from a T(-)B(-)NK(+) type of disease to a T(+)B(+)NK(+) phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the genetic background of patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID).

METHODS

A patient given a diagnosis of CVID, who was born to a consanguineous family and thus would be expected to show an autosomal recessive inheritance, was subjected to clinical evaluation, immunologic assays, homozygosity gene mapping, exome sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and functional analysis.

RESULTS

The 14-year-old patient, who had liver granuloma, extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, and autoimmune neutropenia, presented with a clinical picture resembling CVID. Genetic analysis of this patient showed a homozygous hypomorphic RAG1 mutation (c.1073 G>A, p.C358Y) with a residual functional capacity of 48% of wild-type protein.

CONCLUSION

Our finding broadens the range of disorders associated with RAG1 mutations and might have important therapeutic implications.

Reprint of "Functional overlaps between XLF and the ATM-dependent DNA double strand break response"

Developing B and T lymphocytes generate programmed DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) during the V(D)J recombination process that assembles exons that encode the antigen-binding variable regions of antibodies. In addition, mature B lymphocytes generate programmed DSBs during the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) class switch recombination (CSR) process that allows expression of different antibody heavy chain constant regions that provide different effector functions. During both V(D)J recombination and CSR, DSB intermediates are sensed by the ATM-dependent DSB response (DSBR) pathway, which also contributes to their joining via classical non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ). The precise nature of the interplay between the DSBR and C-NHEJ pathways in the context of DSB repair via C-NHEJ remains under investigation. Recent studies have shown that the XLF C-NHEJ factor has functional redundancy with several members of the ATM-dependent DSBR pathway in C-NHEJ, highlighting unappreciated major roles for both XLF as well as the DSBR in V(D)J recombination, CSR and C-NHEJ in general. In this review, we discuss current knowledge of the mechanisms that contribute to the repair of DSBs generated during B lymphocyte development and activation with a focus on potential functionally redundant roles of XLF and ATM-dependent DSBR factors.

Modeling of the RAG reaction mechanism

In vertebrate V(D)J recombination, it remains unclear how the RAG complex coordinates its catalytic steps with binding to two distant recombination sites. Here, we test the ability of the plausible reaction schemes to fit observed time courses for RAG nicking and DNA hairpin formation. The reaction schemes with the best fitting capability (1) strongly favor a RAG tetrameric complex over a RAG octameric complex; (2) indicate that once a RAG complex brings two recombination signal sequence (RSS) sites into synapsis, the synaptic complex rarely disassembles; (3) predict that the binding of both RSS sites (synapsis) occurs before catalysis (nicking); and (4) show that the RAG binding properties permit strong distinction between RSS sites within active chromatin versus nonspecific DNA or RSS sites within inactive chromatin. The results provide general insights for synapsis by nuclear proteins as well as more specific testable predictions for the RAG proteins.

Functional overlaps between XLF and the ATM-dependent DNA double strand break response

Developing B and T lymphocytes generate programmed DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) during the V(D)J recombination process that assembles exons that encode the antigen-binding variable regions of antibodies. In addition, mature B lymphocytes generate programmed DSBs during the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) class switch recombination (CSR) process that allows expression of different antibody heavy chain constant regions that provide different effector functions. During both V(D)J recombination and CSR, DSB intermediates are sensed by the ATM-dependent DSB response (DSBR) pathway, which also contributes to their joining via classical non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ). The precise nature of the interplay between the DSBR and C-NHEJ pathways in the context of DSB repair via C-NHEJ remains under investigation. Recent studies have shown that the XLF C-NHEJ factor has functional redundancy with several members of the ATM-dependent DSBR pathway in C-NHEJ, highlighting unappreciated major roles for both XLF as well as the DSBR in V(D)J recombination, CSR and C-NHEJ in general. In this review, we discuss current knowledge of the mechanisms that contribute to the repair of DSBs generated during B lymphocyte development and activation with a focus on potential functionally redundant roles of XLF and ATM-dependent DSBR factors.

RAG2's acidic hinge restricts repair-pathway choice and promotes genomic stability

V(D)J recombination-associated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are normally repaired by the high-fidelity classical nonhomologous end-joining (cNHEJ) machinery. Previous studies implicated the recombination-activating gene (RAG)/DNA postcleavage complex (PCC) in regulating pathway choice by preventing access to inappropriate repair mechanisms such as homologous recombination (HR) and alternative NHEJ (aNHEJ). Here, we report that RAG2's "acidic hinge," previously of unknown function, is critical for several key steps. Mutations that reduce the hinge's negative charge destabilize the PCC, disrupt pathway choice, permit repair of RAG-mediated DSBs by the translocation-prone aNHEJ machinery, and reduce genomic stability in developing lymphocytes. Structural predictions and experimental results support our hypothesis that reduced flexibility of the hinge underlies these outcomes. Furthermore, sequence variants present in the human population reduce the hinge's negative charge, permit aNHEJ, and diminish genomic integrity.

Real-time monitoring of RAG-catalyzed DNA cleavage unveils dynamic changes in coding end association with the coding end complex

During V(D)J recombination, the RAG1/2 recombinase is thought to play an active role in transferring newly excised recombination ends from the RAG post-cleavage complex (PCC) to the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) machinery to promote appropriate antigen receptor gene assembly. However, this transfer mechanism is poorly understood, partly because of the technical difficulty in revealing weak association of coding ends (CEs) with one of the PCCs, coding end complex (CEC). Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and anisotropy measurement, we present here real-time monitoring of the RAG1/2-catalyzed cleavage reaction, and provide unequivocal evidence that CEs are retained within the CEC in the presence of Mg(2+). By examining the dynamic fluorescence changes during the cleavage reaction, we compared the stability of CEC assembled with core RAG1 paired with full-length RAG2, core RAG2 or a frameshift RAG2 mutant that was speculated to destabilize the PCC, leading to increased aberrant joining. While the latter two CECs exhibit similar stability, the full-length RAG2 renders a less stable CEC unless H3K4me3 peptides are added. Interestingly, the RAG2 mutant appears to modulate the structure of the RAG-12RSS pre-cleavage complex. Thus, the fluorescence-based detection offers a sensitive, quantitative and continuous assessment of pre-cleavage complex assembly and CEC stability.

XRCC4's interaction with XLF is required for coding (but not signal) end joining

XRCC4 and XLF are structurally related proteins important for DNA Ligase IV function. XRCC4 forms a tight complex with DNA Ligase IV while XLF interacts directly with XRCC4. Both XRCC4 and XLF form homodimers that can polymerize as heterotypic filaments independently of DNA Ligase IV. Emerging structural and in vitro biochemical data suggest that XRCC4 and XLF together generate a filamentous structure that promotes bridging between DNA molecules. Here, we show that ablating XRCC4's affinity for XLF results in DNA repair deficits including a surprising deficit in VDJ coding, but not signal end joining. These data are consistent with a model whereby XRCC4/XLF complexes hold DNA ends together—stringently required for coding end joining, but dispensable for signal end joining. Finally, DNA-PK phosphorylation of XRCC4/XLF complexes disrupt DNA bridging in vitro, suggesting a regulatory role for DNA-PK's phosphorylation of XRCC4/XLF complexes.

The response to and repair of RAG-mediated DNA double-strand breaks

Developing lymphocytes must assemble antigen receptor genes encoding the B cell and T cell receptors. This process is executed by the V(D)J recombination reaction, which can be divided into DNA cleavage and DNA joining steps. The former is carried out by a lymphocyte-specific RAG endonuclease, which mediates DNA cleavage at two recombining gene segments and their flanking RAG recognition sequences. RAG cleavage generates four broken DNA ends that are repaired by nonhomologous end joining forming coding and signal joints. On rare occasions, these DNA ends may join aberrantly forming chromosomal lesions such as translocations, deletions and inversions that have the potential to cause cellular transformation and lymphoid tumors. We discuss the activation of DNA damage responses by RAG-induced DSBs focusing on the component pathways that promote their normal repair and guard against their aberrant resolution. Moreover, we discuss how this DNA damage response impacts processes important for lymphocyte development.

Lymphocyte development: integration of DNA damage response signaling

Lymphocytes traverse functionally discrete stages as they develop into mature B and T cells. This development is directed by cues from a variety of different cell surface receptors. To complete development, all lymphocytes must express a functional nonautoreactive heterodimeric antigen receptor. The genes that encode antigen receptor chains are assembled through the process of V(D)J recombination, a reaction that proceeds through DNA double-stranded break (DSB) intermediates. These DSBs are generated by the RAG endonuclease in G1-phase developing lymphocytes and activate ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), the kinase that orchestrates cellular DSB responses. The canonical DNA damage response includes cell cycle arrest, DNA break repair, and apoptosis of cells when DSBs are not repaired. However, recent studies have demonstrated that ATM activation in response to RAG DSBs also regulates a transcriptional program including many genes with no known function in canonical DNA damage responses. Rather, these genes have activities that would be important for lymphocyte development. Here, these findings and the broader concept that signals initiated by physiologic DNA DSBs provide cues that regulate cell type-specific processes and functions are discussed.

Differential reaction kinetics, cleavage complex formation, and nonamer binding domain dependence dictate the structure-specific and sequence-specific nuclease activity of RAGs

During V(D)J recombination, RAG (recombination-activating gene) complex cleaves DNA based on sequence specificity. Besides its physiological function, RAG has been shown to act as a structure-specific nuclease. Recently, we showed that the presence of cytosine within the single-stranded region of heteroduplex DNA is important when RAGs cleave on DNA structures. In the present study, we report that heteroduplex DNA containing a bubble region can be cleaved efficiently when present along with a recombination signal sequence (RSS) in cis or trans configuration. The sequence of the bubble region influences RAG cleavage at RSS when present in cis. We also find that the kinetics of RAG cleavage differs between RSS and bubble, wherein RSS cleavage reaches maximum efficiency faster than bubble cleavage. In addition, unlike RSS, RAG cleavage at bubbles does not lead to cleavage complex formation. Finally, we show that the "nonamer binding region," which regulates RAG cleavage on RSS, is not important during RAG activity in non-B DNA structures. Therefore, in the current study, we identify the possible mechanism by which RAG cleavage is regulated when it acts as a structure-specific nuclease.

V(D)J recombination: mechanisms of initiation

V(D)J recombination assembles immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes during lymphocyte development through a series of carefully orchestrated DNA breakage and rejoining events. DNA cleavage requires a series of protein-DNA complexes containing the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and recombination signals that flank the recombining gene segments. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the function and domain organization of the RAG proteins, the composition and structure of RAG-DNA complexes, and the pathways that lead to the formation of these complexes. We also consider the functional significance of RAG-mediated histone recognition and ubiquitin ligase activities, and the role played by RAG in ensuring proper repair of DNA breaks made during V(D)J recombination. Finally, we propose a model for the formation of RAG-DNA complexes that involves anchoring of RAG1 at the recombination signal nonamer and RAG2-dependent surveillance of adjoining DNA for suitable spacer and heptamer sequences.

Repair of chromosomal RAG-mediated DNA breaks by mutant RAG proteins lacking phosphatidylinositol 3-like kinase consensus phosphorylation sites

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunits (DNA-PKcs) are members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-like family of serine/threonine kinases that phosphorylate serines or threonines when positioned adjacent to a glutamine residue (SQ/TQ). Both kinases are activated rapidly by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and regulate the function of proteins involved in DNA damage responses. In developing lymphocytes, DSBs are generated during V(D)J recombination, which is required to assemble the second exon of all Ag receptor genes. This reaction is initiated through a DNA cleavage step by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, which together comprise an endonuclease that generates DSBs at the border of two recombining gene segments and their flanking recombination signals. This DNA cleavage step is followed by a joining step, during which pairs of DNA coding and signal ends are ligated to form a coding joint and a signal joint, respectively. ATM and DNA-PKcs are integrally involved in the repair of both signal and coding ends, but the targets of these kinases involved in the repair process have not been fully elucidated. In this regard, the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, which each have several SQ/TQ motifs, have been implicated in the repair of RAG-mediated DSBs. In this study, we use a previously developed approach for studying chromosomal V(D)J recombination that has been modified to allow for the analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 function. We show that phosphorylation of RAG1 or RAG2 by ATM or DNA-PKcs at SQ/TQ consensus sites is dispensable for the joining step of V(D)J recombination.

Unique and redundant functions of ATM and DNA-PKcs during V(D)J recombination

Lymphocyte antigen receptor genes are assembled through the process of V(D)J recombination, during which pairwise DNA cleavage of gene segments results in the formation of four DNA ends that are resolved into a coding joint and a signal joint. The joining of these DNA ends occurs in G1-phase lymphocytes and is mediated by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. The ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), two related kinases, both function in the repair of DNA breaks generated during antigen receptor gene assembly. Although these proteins have unique functions during coding joint formation, their activities in signal joint formation, if any, have been less clear. However, two recent studies demonstrated that ATM and DNA-PKcs have overlapping activities important for signal joint formation. Here, we discuss the unique and shared activities of the ATM and DNA-PKcs kinases during V(D)J recombination, a process that is essential for lymphocyte development and the diversification of antigen receptors.

The RAG1 V(D)J recombinase/ubiquitin ligase promotes ubiquitylation of acetylated, phosphorylated histone 3.3

Histone variant H3.3 is associated with transcriptionally active chromatin and accumulates at loci undergoing preparation for V(D)J recombination, a DNA rearrangement required for the assembly of antigen receptors and development of B and T lymphocytes. Here we demonstrate that the RAG1 V(D)J recombinase protein promotes ubiquitylation of H3.3 that has been heavily acetylated and phosphorylated on serine 31 (acetyl-H3.3 S31p). A fragment of RAG1 promoted formation of a mono-ubiquitylated H3 product that was identified using mass spectrometry as ubiquitylated acetyl-H3.3 S31p. H3 was ubiquitylated at multiple lysine residues, and correspondingly, di-, tri- and higher-order ubiquitylated products were detected at low levels. Ubiquitylation was dependent on an intact RAG1 RING finger/ubiquitin ligase domain and required additional regions of the RAG1 amino terminus that are likely to interact with H3. Acetylated residues within the H3 amino terminal tail were also required. Purified, recombinant H3.1 and H3.3 were not good substrates, suggesting that post-translational modifications enhance recognition by RAG1. A complex including damage-DNA binding protein has also been shown to ubiquitylate H3 in response to UV treatment, suggesting the H3 ubiquitylation may be a common step in multiple DNA repair pathways.

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (Atm) and DNA-PKcs kinases have overlapping activities during chromosomal signal joint formation

Lymphocyte antigen receptor gene assembly occurs through the process of V(D)J recombination, which is initiated when the RAG endonuclease introduces DNA DSBs at two recombining gene segments to form broken DNA coding end pairs and signal end pairs. These paired DNA ends are joined by proteins of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of DSB repair to form a coding joint and signal joint, respectively. RAG DSBs are generated in G1-phase developing lymphocytes, where they activate the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (Atm) and DNA-PKcs kinases to orchestrate diverse cellular DNA damage responses including DSB repair. Paradoxically, although Atm and DNA-PKcs both function during coding joint formation, Atm appears to be dispensible for signal joint formation; and although some studies have revealed an activity for DNA-PKcs during signal joint formation, others have not. Here we show that Atm and DNA-PKcs have overlapping catalytic activities that are required for chromosomal signal joint formation and for preventing the aberrant resolution of signal ends as potentially oncogenic chromosomal translocations.

Replication independent DNA double-strand break retention may prevent genomic instability

Background

Global hypomethylation and genomic instability are cardinal features of cancers. Recently, we established a method for the detection of DNA methylation levels at sites close to endogenous DNA double strand breaks (EDSBs), and found that those sites have a higher level of methylation than the rest of the genome. Interestingly, the most significant differences between EDSBs and genomes were observed when cells were cultured in the absence of serum. DNA methylation levels on each genomic location are different. Therefore, there are more replication-independent EDSBs (RIND-EDSBs) located in methylated genomic regions. Moreover, methylated and unmethylated RIND-EDSBs are differentially processed. Euchromatins respond rapidly to DSBs induced by irradiation with the phosphorylation of H2AX, γ-H2AX, and these initiate the DSB repair process. During G0, most DSBs are repaired by non-homologous end-joining repair (NHEJ), mediated by at least two distinct pathways; the Ku-mediated and the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)-mediated. The ATM-mediated pathway is more precise. Here we explored how cells process methylated RIND-EDSBs and if RIND-EDSBs play a role in global hypomethylation-induced genomic instability.

Results

We observed a significant number of methylated RIND-EDSBs that are retained within deacetylated chromatin and free from an immediate cellular response to DSBs, the γ-H2AX. When cells were treated with tricostatin A (TSA) and the histones became hyperacetylated, the amount of γ-H2AX-bound DNA increased and the retained RIND-EDSBs were rapidly repaired. When NHEJ was simultaneously inhibited in TSA-treated cells, more EDSBs were detected. Without TSA, a sporadic increase in unmethylated RIND-EDSBs could be observed when Ku-mediated NHEJ was inhibited. Finally, a remarkable increase in RIND-EDSB methylation levels was observed when cells were depleted of ATM, but not of Ku86 and RAD51.

Conclusions

Methylated RIND-EDSBs are retained in non-acetylated heterochromatin because there is a prolonged time lag between RIND-EDSB production and repair. The rapid cellular responses to DSBs may be blocked by compact heterochromatin structure which then allows these breaks to be repaired by a more precise ATM-dependent pathway. In contrast, Ku-mediated NHEJ can repair euchromatin-associated EDSBs. Consequently, spontaneous mutations in hypomethylated genome are produced at faster rates because unmethylated EDSBs are unable to avoid the more error-prone NHEJ mechanisms.

Non-consensus heptamer sequences destabilize the RAG post-cleavage complex, making ends available to alternative DNA repair pathways

V(D)J recombination entails double-stranded DNA cleavage at the antigen receptor loci by the RAG1/2 proteins, which recognize conserved recombination signal sequences (RSSs) adjoining variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments. After cleavage, RAG1/2 remain associated with the coding and signal ends (SE) in a post-cleavage complex (PCC), which is critical for their proper joining by classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Certain mutations in RAG1/2 destabilize the PCC, allowing DNA ends to access inappropriate repair pathways such as alternative NHEJ, an error-prone pathway implicated in chromosomal translocations. The PCC is thus thought to discourage aberrant rearrangements by controlling repair pathway choice. Since interactions between RAG1/2 and the RSS heptamer element are especially important in forming the RAG-SE complex, we hypothesized that non-consensus heptamer sequences might affect PCC stability. We find that certain non-consensus heptamers, including a cryptic heptamer implicated in oncogenic chromosomal rearrangements, destabilize the PCC, allowing coding and SEs to be repaired by non-standard pathways, including alternative NHEJ. These data suggest that some non-consensus RSS, frequently present at chromosomal translocations in lymphoid neoplasms, may promote genomic instability by a novel mechanism, disabling the PCC’s ability to restrict repair pathway choice.

Requirement for ubiquitin conjugation and 26S proteasome activity at an early stage in V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination, the process that rearranges gene segments to assemble mature antigen receptor genes, relies on a recombinase comprising the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins. RAG1 is a multi-functional enzyme including DNA binding and cleavage as well as ubiquitin ligase activities, all of which appear to contribute to its role in recombination. Here we demonstrate that components of the ubiquitin conjugation machinery and the 26S proteasome are required for an early step in V(D)J recombination. Inhibitors of the 26S proteasome and ubiquitin activating enzyme (E1) blocked both chromosomal and extra-chromosomal recombination when added 1h following transfection/induction, but they had no effect when added 16 h later. There was no effect on expression of RAG1, and recombination did not require transit through the cell cycle, confirming that inhibition was not due to an indirect effect on cell cycle arrest or protein expression. Experiments in which RAG1 translation was blocked with cyclohexamide after 16 h of expression indicated that many active recombination complexes were formed within this window, although recombination products continued to accumulate for 48 h. These data suggest that ubiquitin-dependent degradation is an early step in complex assembly or activation, and are consistent with our previous hypothesis that degradation of a negative regulator is required to trigger recombination.

Cytosines, but not purines, determine recombination activating gene (RAG)-induced breaks on heteroduplex DNA structures: implications for genomic instability

The sequence specificity of the recombination activating gene (RAG) complex during V(D)J recombination has been well studied. RAGs can also act as structure-specific nuclease; however, little is known about the mechanism of its action. Here, we show that in addition to DNA structure, sequence dictates the pattern and efficiency of RAG cleavage on altered DNA structures. Cytosine nucleotides are preferentially nicked by RAGs when present at single-stranded regions of heteroduplex DNA. Although unpaired thymine nucleotides are also nicked, the efficiency is many fold weaker. Induction of single- or double-strand breaks by RAGs depends on the position of cytosines and whether it is present on one or both of the strands. Interestingly, RAGs are unable to induce breaks when adenine or guanine nucleotides are present at single-strand regions. The nucleotide present immediately next to the bubble sequence could also affect RAG cleavage. Hence, we propose "C((d))C((S))C((S))" (d, double-stranded; s, single-stranded) as a consensus sequence for RAG-induced breaks at single-/double-strand DNA transitions. Such a consensus sequence motif is useful for explaining RAG cleavage on other types of DNA structures described in the literature. Therefore, the mechanism of RAG cleavage described here could explain facets of chromosomal rearrangements specific to lymphoid tissues leading to genomic instability.

Initial stages of V(D)J recombination: the organization of RAG1/2 and RSS DNA in the postcleavage complex

To obtain structural information on the early stages of V(D)J recombination, we isolated a complex of the core RAG1 and RAG2 proteins with DNA containing a pair of cleaved recombination signal sequences (RSS). Stoichiometric and molecular mass analysis established that this signal-end complex (SEC) contains two protomers each of RAG1 and RAG2. Visualization of the SEC by negative-staining electron microscopy revealed an anchor-shaped particle with approximate two-fold symmetry. Consistent with a parallel arrangement of DNA and protein subunits, the N termini of RAG1 and RAG2 are positioned at opposing ends of the complex, and the DNA chains beyond the RSS nonamer emerge from the same face of the complex, near the RAG1 N termini. These first images of the V(D)J recombinase in its postcleavage state provide a framework for modeling RAG domains and their interactions with DNA.

H3K4me3 stimulates the V(D)J RAG complex for both nicking and hairpinning in trans in addition to tethering in cis: implications for translocations

The PHD finger of the RAG2 polypeptide of the RAG1/RAG2 complex binds to the histone H3 modification, trimethylated lysine 4 (H3K4me3), and in some manner increases V(D)J recombination. In the absence of biochemical studies of H3K4me3 on purified RAG enzyme activity, the precise role of H3K4me3 remains unclear. Here, we find that H3K4me3 stimulates purified RAG enzymatic activity at both the nicking (2- to 5-fold) and hairpinning (3- to 11-fold) steps of V(D)J recombination. Remarkably, this stimulation can be achieved with free H3K4me3 peptide (in trans), indicating that H3K4me3 functions via two distinct mechanisms. It not only tethers the RAG enzyme complex to a region of DNA, but it also induces a substantial increase in the catalytic turnover number (k(cat)) of the RAG complex. The H3K4me3 catalytic stimulation applies to suboptimal cryptic RSS sites located at H3K4me3 peaks that are critical in the inception of human T cell acute lymphoblastic lymphomas.

Accessibility of chromosomal recombination breaks in nuclei of wild-type and DNA-PKcs-deficient cells

V(D)J recombination is a highly regulated process, proceeding from a site-specific cleavage to an imprecise end joining. After the DNA excision catalyzed by the recombinase encoded by recombination activating genes 1 and 2 (RAG1/2), newly generated recombination ends are believed held by a post-cleavage complex (PC) consisting of RAG1/2 proteins, and are subsequently resolved by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) machinery. The relay of these ends from PC to NHEJ remains elusive. It has been speculated that NHEJ factors modify the RAG1/2-PC to gain access to the ends or act on free ends after the disassembly of the PC. Thus, recombination ends may either be retained in a complex throughout the recombination process or left as unprotected free ends after cleavage, a condition that may permit an alternative, non-classical NHEJ end joining pathway. To directly test these scenarios on recombination induced chromosomal breaks, we have developed a recombination end protection assay to monitor the accessibility of recombination ends to exonuclease-V in intact nuclei. We demonstrate that these ends are well protected in the nuclei of wild-type cells, suggesting a seamless cleavage-joining reaction. However, divergent end protection of coding versus signal ends was found in cells derived from severe combined immunodeficient (scid) mice that are defective in the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). While signal ends are resistant, opened coding ends are susceptible to enzymatic modification. Our data suggests a role of DNA-PKcs in protecting chromosomal coding ends. Furthermore, using recombination inducible scid cell lines, we demonstrate that conditional protection of coding ends is inversely correlated with the level of their resolution, i.e., the greater the accessibility of the coding ends, the higher level of coding joints formed. Taken together, our findings provide important insights into the resolution of recombination ends by error-prone alternative NHEJ pathways.

The roles of the RAG1 and RAG2 "non-core" regions in V(D)J recombination and lymphocyte development

The enormous repertoire of the vertebrate specific immune system relies on the rearrangement of discrete gene segments into intact antigen receptor genes during the early stages of B-and T-cell development. This V(D)J recombination is initiated by a lymphoid-specific recombinase comprising the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, which introduces double-strand breaks in the DNA adjacent to the coding segments. Much of the biochemical research into V(D)J recombination has focused on truncated or "core" fragments of RAG1 and RAG2, which lack approximately one third of the amino acids from each. However, genetic analyses of SCID and Omenn syndrome patients indicate that residues outside the cores are essential to normal immune development. This is in agreement with the striking degree of conservation across all vertebrate classes in certain non-core domains. Work from multiple laboratories has shed light on activities resident within these domains, including ubiquitin ligase activity and KPNA1 binding by the RING finger domain of RAG1 and the recognition of specific chromatin modifications as well as phosphoinositide binding by the PHD module of RAG2. In addition, elements outside of the cores are necessary for regulated protein expression and turnover. Here the current state of knowledge is reviewed regarding the non-core regions of RAG1 and RAG2 and how these findings contribute to our broader understanding of recombination.

Leaky severe combined immunodeficiency and aberrant DNA rearrangements due to a hypomorphic RAG1 mutation

The RAG1/2 endonuclease initiates programmed DNA rearrangements in progenitor lymphocytes by generating double-strand breaks at specific recombination signal sequences. This process, known as V(D)J recombination, assembles the vastly diverse antigen receptor genes from numerous V, D, and J coding segments. In vitro biochemical and cellular transfection studies suggest that RAG1/2 may also play postcleavage roles by forming complexes with the recombining ends to facilitate DNA end processing and ligation. In the current study, we examine the in vivo consequences of a mutant form of RAG1, RAG1-S723C, that is proficient for DNA cleavage, yet exhibits defects in postcleavage complex formation and end joining in vitro. We generated a knockin mouse model harboring the RAG1-S723C hypomorphic mutation and examined the immune system in this fully in vivo setting. RAG1-S723C homozygous mice exhibit impaired lymphocyte development and decreased V(D)J rearrangements. Distinct from RAG nullizygosity, the RAG1-S723C hypomorph results in aberrant DNA double-strand breaks within rearranging loci. RAG1-S723C also predisposes to thymic lymphomas associated with chromosomal translocations in a p53 mutant background, and heterozygosity for the mutant allele accelerates age-associated immune system dysfunction. Thus, our study provides in vivo evidence that implicates aberrant RAG1/2 activity in lymphoid tumor development and premature immunosenescence.

A biochemically defined system for coding joint formation in V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination is one of the most complex DNA transactions in biology. The RAG complex makes double-stranded breaks adjacent to signal sequences and creates hairpin coding ends. Here, we find that the kinase activity of the Artemis:DNA-PKcs complex can be activated by hairpin DNA ends in cis, thereby allowing the hairpins to be nicked and then to undergo processing and joining by nonhomologous DNA end joining. Based on these insights, we have reconstituted many aspects of the antigen receptor diversification of V(D)J recombination by using 13 highly purified polypeptides, thereby permitting variable domain exon assembly by using this fully defined system in accord with the 12/23 rule for this process. The features of the recombination sites created by this system include all of the features observed in vivo (nucleolytic resection, P nucleotides, and N nucleotide addition), indicating that most, if not all, of the end modification enzymes have been identified.

Evidence for Ku70/Ku80 association with full-length RAG1

Antigen receptor genes are assembled by a site-specific DNA rearrangement process called V(D)J recombination. This process proceeds through two distinct phases: a cleavage phase in which the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins introduce DNA double-strand breaks at antigen receptor gene segments, and a joining phase in which the resulting DNA breaks are processed and repaired via the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway. Genetic and biochemical evidence suggest that the RAG proteins play an active role in guiding the repair of DNA breaks introduced during V(D)J recombination to the NHEJ pathway. However, evidence for specific association between the RAG proteins and any of the factors involved in NHEJ remains elusive. Here we present evidence that two components of the NHEJ pathway, Ku70 and Ku80, interact with full-length RAG1, providing a biochemical link between the two phases of V(D)J recombination.

von Hippel Lindau binding protein 1-mediated degradation of integrase affects HIV-1 gene expression at a postintegration step

HIV-1 integrase, the viral enzyme responsible for provirus integration into the host genome, can be actively degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Here, we identify von Hippel-Lindau binding protein 1(VBP1), a subunit of the prefoldin chaperone, as an integrase cellular binding protein that bridges interaction between integrase and the cullin2 (Cul2)-based von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) ubiquitin ligase. We demonstrate that VBP1 and Cul2/VHL are required for proper HIV-1 expression at a step between integrase-dependent proviral integration into the host genome and transcription of viral genes. Using both an siRNA approach and Cul2/VHL mutant cells, we show that VBP1 and the Cul2/VHL ligase cooperate in the efficient polyubiquitylation of integrase and its subsequent proteasome-mediated degradation. Results presented here support a role for integrase degradation by the prefoldin-VHL-proteasome pathway in the integration-transcription transition of the viral replication cycle.

The structure-specific nicking of small heteroduplexes by the RAG complex: implications for lymphoid chromosomal translocations

During V(D)J recombination, the RAG complex binds at recombination signal sequences and creates double-strand breaks. In addition to this sequence-specific recognition of the RSS, the RAG complex has been shown to be a structure-specific nuclease, cleaving 3' overhangs and 3' flaps, and, more recently, 10 nucleotides (nt) bubble (heteroduplex) structures. Here, we assess the smallest size heteroduplex that core and full-length RAGs can cleave. We also test whether bubbles adjacent to a partial RSS are nicked any differently or any more efficiently than bubbles that are surrounded by random sequence. These points are important in considering what types and what size of non-B DNA structure that the RAG complex can nick, and this helps assess the role of the RAG complex in mediating lymphoid chromosomal translocations. We find that the smallest bubble nicked by the RAG complex is 3nt, and proximity to a partial or full RSS sequence does not affect the nicking by RAGs. RAG nicking efficiency increases with the size of the heteroduplex and is only about two-fold less efficient than an RSS when the bubble is 6nt. We consider these findings in the context of RAG nicking at non-B DNA structures in lymphoid chromosomal translocations.

Loading of the nonhomologous end joining factor, Ku, on protein-occluded DNA ends

The nonhomologous end joining pathway for DNA double strand break repair requires Ku to bind DNA ends and subsequently recruit other nonhomologous end joining factors, including the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit and the XRCC4-Ligase IV complex, to the break site. Ku loads at a break by threading the DNA ends through a circular channel in its structure. This binding mechanism explains both the high specificity of Ku for ends and its ability to translocate along DNA once loaded. However, DNA in cells is typically coated with other proteins (e.g. histones), which might be expected to block the ability of Ku to load in this manner. Here we address how the nature of a protein obstruction dictates how Ku interacts with a DNA end. Ku is unable to access the ends within an important intermediate in V(D)J recombination (a complex of RAG proteins bound to cleaved recombination targeting signals), but Ku readily displaces the linker histone, H1, from DNA. Ku also retains physiological affinity for nucleosome-associated ends. Loading onto nucleosome-associated ends still occurs by threading the end through its channel, but rather than displacing the nucleosome, Ku peels as much as 50 bp of DNA away from the histone octamer surface. We suggest a model where Ku utilizes an unusual characteristic of its three-dimensional structure to recognize certain protein-occluded ends without the extensive remodeling of chromatin structure required by other DNA repair pathways.

V(D)J recombination in zebrafish: Normal joining products with accumulation of unresolved coding ends and deleted signal ends

V(D)J recombination proceeds from a site-specific cleavage to an imprecise end joining, via generation and resolution of recombination ends. Although rearranged antigen receptor genes isolated from zebrafish (Danio rerio) resemble those made in mammals, differences may arise during evolution from lower to higher vertebrates, in regard to efficiency, fidelity and regulation of this recombination. To elucidate the V(D)J recombination reaction in zebrafish, we characterized recombination ends transiently produced by zebrafish lymphocytes, as well as joining products. Similar to their mammalian counterpart, zebrafish lymphocytes make perfect signal joints and normal coding joints, indicating their competent end resolution machinery. However, recombination ends recovered from the same zebrafish lymphoid tissues exhibit some features that are not readily seen in normal mammalian counterpart: deleted signal ends and accumulation of opened coding ends. These results indicate that the recombination reaction in zebrafish lymphocytes is inefficient and less stringently regulated, which may result from unstable post-cleavage complexes, and/or slow transition from cleavage to resolution. Our data suggests that the V(D)J recombination machinery may have undergone evolution selection to become more efficient in higher jawed vertebrates.

Mobilization of RAG-generated signal ends by transposition and insertion in vivo

In addition to their essential roles in V(D)J recombination, the RAG proteins have been found to catalyze transposition in vitro, but it has been difficult to demonstrate transposition by the RAG proteins in vivo in vertebrate cells. As genomic instability and chromosomal translocations are common outcomes of transposition in other species, it is critical to understand if the RAG proteins behave as a transposase in vertebrate cells. To facilitate this, we have developed an episome-based assay to detect products of RAG-mediated transposition in the human embryonic kidney cell line 293T. Transposition events into the target episome, accompanied by characteristic target site duplications, were detected at a low frequency using RAG1 and either truncated "core" RAG2 or full-length RAG2. More frequently, insertion of the RAG-generated signal end fragment into the target was accompanied by deletions or more complex rearrangements, and our data indicate that these events occur by a mechanism that is distinct from transposition. An assay to detect transposition from an episome into the human genome failed to detect bona fide transposition events but instead yielded chromosome deletion and translocation events involving the signal end fragment mobilized by the RAG proteins. These assays provide a means of assessing RAG-mediated transposition in vivo, and our findings provide insight into the potential for the products of RAG-mediated DNA cleavage to cause genome instability.

Mechanism and control of V(D)J recombination versus class switch recombination: similarities and differences

V(D)J recombination is the process by which the variable region exons encoding the antigen recognition sites of receptors expressed on B and T lymphocytes are generated during early development via somatic assembly of component gene segments. In response to antigen, somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) induce further modifications of immunoglobulin genes in B cells. CSR changes the IgH constant region for an alternate set that confers distinct antibody effector functions. SHM introduces mutations, at a high rate, into variable region exons, ultimately allowing affinity maturation. All of these genomic alteration processes require tight regulatory control mechanisms, both to ensure development of a normal immune system and to prevent potentially oncogenic processes, such as translocations, caused by errors in the recombination/mutation processes. In this regard, transcription of substrate sequences plays a significant role in target specificity, and transcription is mechanistically coupled to CSR and SHM. However, there are many mechanistic differences in these reactions. V(D)J recombination proceeds via precise DNA cleavage initiated by the RAG proteins at short conserved signal sequences, whereas CSR and SHM are initiated over large target regions via activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-mediated DNA deamination of transcribed target DNA. Yet, new evidence suggests that AID cofactors may help provide an additional layer of specificity for both SHM and CSR. Whereas repair of RAG-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) involves the general nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway, and CSR also depends on at least some of these factors, CSR requires induction of certain general DSB response factors, whereas V(D)J recombination does not. In this review, we compare and contrast V(D)J recombination and CSR, with particular emphasis on the role of the initiating enzymes and DNA repair proteins in these processes.

The MRE11-RAD50-XRS2 Complex, in Addition to Other Non-homologous End-joining Factors, Is Required for V(D)J Joining in Yeast

Lymphoid cells of the vertebrate immune system rely on factors in the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) DNA repair pathway to form signal joints during V(D)J recombination. Unlike other end-joining reactions, signal joint formation is a specialized case of NHEJ that also requires the lymphoid-specific RAG proteins. Whether V(D)J recombination requires the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex remains an open question, as null mutations in any member of the complex are lethal in mammals. However, Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains carrying null mutations in components of the homologous Mre11p-Rad50p-Xrs2p (MRX) complex are viable. We therefore took advantage of a recently developed V(D)J recombination assay in yeast to assess the role of MRX in V(D)J joining. Here we confirmed that signal joint formation in yeast is dependent on the same NHEJ factors known to be required in mammalian cells. In addition, we showed an absolute requirement for the MRX complex in signal joining, suggesting that the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex may be required for signal joint formation in mammalian cells as well.

Antigen receptor genes and the evolution of a recombinase

Antigen receptor genes exist in the germline in a "split" configuration and are assembled in developing B and T lymphocytes by V(D)J recombination. This site-specific recombination reaction is initiated by a complex containing the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and completed by general DNA repair factors. RAG1 and RAG2, like the adaptive immune system itself, are found exclusively in jawed vertebrates, and are thought to have entered the vertebrate genome by horizontal transmission as components of a transposable element. This review discusses the structure of antigen receptor genes and the mechanisms by which they are assembled and diversified, and then goes on to consider the evolutionary implications of the arrival of the hypothetical "RAG transposon".

The bounty of RAGs: recombination signal complexes and reaction outcomes

V(D)J recombination is a form of site-specific DNA rearrangement through which antigen receptor genes are assembled. This process involves the breakage and reunion of DNA mediated by two lymphoid cell-specific proteins, recombination activating genes RAG-1 and RAG-2, and ubiquitously expressed architectural DNA-binding proteins and DNA-repair factors. Here I review the progress toward understanding the composition, assembly, organization, and activity of the protein-DNA complexes that support the initiation of V(D)J recombination, as well as the molecular basis for the sequence-specific recognition of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) that are the targets of the RAG proteins. Parallels are drawn between V(D)J recombination and Tn5/Tn10 transposition with respect to the reactions, the proteins, and the protein-DNA complexes involved in these processes. I also consider the relative roles of the different sequence elements within the RSS in recognition, cleavage, and post-cleavage events. Finally, I discuss alternative DNA transactions mediated by the V(D)J recombinase, the protein-DNA complexes that support them, and factors and forces that control them.

New concepts in the regulation of an ancient reaction: transposition by RAG1/RAG2

The lymphoid-specific factors, recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2, initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA double-stand breaks at specific sites in the genome. In addition to this critical endonuclease activity, the RAG proteins catalyze other chemical reactions that can affect the outcome of V(D)J recombination, one of which is transposition. While the transposition activity of the RAG proteins is thought to have been critical for the evolution of modern antigen-receptor loci, it has also been proposed to contribute to chromosomal translocations and lymphoid malignancy. A major challenge has been to determine how the transposition activity of the RAG proteins is regulated in vivo. Although a variety of mechanisms have been suggested by recent studies, a clear resolution of this issue remains elusive.

Putting the pieces together: identification and characterization of structural domains in the V(D)J recombination protein RAG1

V(D)J recombination generates functional immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes in developing lymphocytes. The recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins catalyze site-specific DNA cleavage in this recombination process. Biochemical studies have identified catalytically active regions of each protein, referred to as the core regions. Here, we review our progress in the identification and characterization, in biophysical and biochemical terms, of topologically independent domains within both the non-core and core regions of RAG1. Previous characterizations of a structural domain identified in the non-core region of RAG1 from residues 265-380, referred to as the zinc-binding dimerization domain, are discussed. This domain contains two zinc-binding motifs, a RING finger and a C2H2 zinc finger. Core RAG1 also consists of multiple domains, each of which functions individually in one or more of the essential macromolecular interactions formed by the intact core protein. Two structural domains referred to as the central and the C-terminal domains that include residues 528-760 and 761-979 of RAG1, respectively, have been identified. The interactions of the central and C-terminal domains in core RAG1 with the recombination signal sequence (RSS) have contributed additional insight to a developing model for the RAG1-RSS complex.

The taming of a transposon: V(D)J recombination and the immune system

The genes that encode immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors must be assembled from the multiple variable (V), joining (J), and sometimes diversity (D) gene segments present in the germline loci. This process of V(D)J recombination is the major source of the immense diversity of the immune repertoire of jawed vertebrates. The recombinase that initiates the process, recombination-activating genes 1 (RAG1) and RAG2, belongs to a large family that includes transposases and retroviral integrases. RAG1/2 cleaves the DNA adjacent to the gene segments to be recombined, and the segments are then joined together by DNA repair factors. A decade of biochemical research on RAG1/2 has revealed many similarities to transposition, culminating with the observation that RAG1/2 can carry out transpositional strand transfer. Here, we discuss the parallels between V(D)J recombination and transposition, focusing specifically on the assembly of the recombination nucleoprotein complex, the mechanism of cleavage, the disassembly of post-cleavage complexes, and aberrant reactions carried out by the recombinase that do not result in successful locus rearrangement and may be deleterious to the organism. This work highlights the considerable diversity of transposition systems and their relation to V(D)J recombination.

Increased frequency of aberrant V(D)J recombination products in core RAG-expressing mice

RAG1 and RAG2 play a central role in V(D)J recombination, a process for antigen receptor gene assembly. The truncated 'core' regions of RAGs are sufficient to catalyze the recombination reaction, although with lower joining efficiency than full-length proteins. To investigate the role of the non-core regions of RAGs in the end-joining phase of antigen receptor rearrangement, we analyzed recombination products isolated from core RAG1 and core RAG2 knock-in mice. Here, we report that the truncation of RAGs increases the frequency of aberrant recombination in vivo. Signal joints (SJs) associated with V-to-D recombination of core RAG1 knock-in mice were normal, whereas those of core RAG2 knock-in mice were highly imprecise, containing large deletions and additions, and in some cases coding sequences. In contrast, we found an elevated level of imprecise D-to-J associated SJs for both core RAG1- and RAG2-expressing mice. Likewise, sequences of coding joints (CJs) were also affected by the expression of core RAGs. Finally, sequences found at the junctions of rearranged T-cell receptor loci were highly influenced by differences in rearranging recombination signal sequence pairs. We provide the first evidence that the non-core regions of RAGs have critical functions in the proper assembly and resolution of recombination intermediates in endogenous antigen receptor loci.

Artemis sheds new light on V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination represents one of the three mechanisms that contribute to the diversity of the immune repertoire of B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes. It also constitutes a major checkpoint during the development of the immune system. Indeed, any V(D)J recombination deficiency leads to a block of B-cell and T-cell maturation in humans and animal models, leading to severe combined immunodeficiency (T-B-SCID). Nine factors have been identified so far to participate in V(D)J recombination. The discovery of Artemis, mutated in a subset of T-B-SCID, provided some new information regarding one of the missing V(D)J recombinase activities: hairpin opening at coding ends prior to DNA repair of the recombination activating genes 1/2-generated DNA double-strand break. New conditions of immune deficiency in humans are now under investigations and should lead to the identification of additional V(D)J recombination/DNA repair factors.

V(D)J recombination: how to tame a transposase

Since the discovery that the recombination-activating gene (RAG) proteins were capable of transposition in vitro, investigators have been trying to uncover instances of transposition in vivo and understand how this transposase has been harnessed to do useful work while being inhibited from causing deleterious chromosome rearrangements. How to preserve the capacity of the recombinase to promote a certain class of rearrangements while curtailing its ability to catalyze others is an interesting problem. In this review, we examine the progress that has been made toward understanding the regulatory mechanisms that prohibit transposition in order to formulate a model that takes into account the diverse observations that have been made over the last 15 years. First, we touch on the striking mechanistic similarities between transposition and V(D)J recombination and review evidence suggesting that the RAG proteins may be members of the retroviral integrase superfamily. We then dispense with an old theory that certain standard products of V(D)J recombination called signal joints protect against deleterious transposition events. Finally, we discuss the evidence that target capture could serve a regulatory role and close with an analysis of hairpins as preferred targets for RAG-mediated transposition. These novel strategies for harnessing the RAG transposase not only shed light on V(D)J recombination but also may provide insight into the regulation of other transposases.

In vitro processing of the 3'-overhanging DNA in the postcleavage complex involved in V(D)J joining

The postcleavage complex involved in V(D)J joining is known to possess a transpositional strand transfer activity, whose physiological role is yet to be clarified. Here we report that RAG1 and RAG2 proteins in the signal end (SE) complex cleave the 3'-overhanging structure of the synthetic coding-end (CE) DNA in two successive steps in vitro. The 3'-overhanging structure is attacked by the SE complex imprecisely, near the double-stranded/single-stranded (ds/ss) junction, and transferred to the SE. The transferred overhang is then resolved and cleaved precisely at the ds/ss junction, generating either the linear or the circular cleavage products. Thus, the blunt-end structure is restored for the SE and variably processed ends are generated for the synthetic CE. This 3'-processing activity is observed not only with the core RAG2 but also with the full-length protein.

RAG proteins shepherd double-strand breaks to a specific pathway, suppressing error-prone repair, but RAG nicking initiates homologous recombination

The two major pathways for repairing double-strand breaks (DSBs), homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), have traditionally been thought to operate in different stages of the cell cycle. This division of labor is not absolute, however, and precisely what governs the choice of pathway to repair a given DSB has remained enigmatic. We pursued this question by studying the site-specific DSBs created during V(D)J recombination, which relies on classical NHEJ to repair the broken ends. We show that mutations that form unstable RAG postcleavage complexes allow DNA ends to participate in both homologous recombination and the error-prone alternative NHEJ pathway. By abrogating a key function of the complex, these mutations reveal it to be a molecular shepherd that guides DSBs to the proper pathway. We also find that RAG-mediated nicks efficiently stimulate homologous recombination and discuss the implications of these findings for oncogenic chromosomal rearrangements, evolution, and gene targeting.

Distinct requirements for Ku in N nucleotide addition at V(D)J- and non-V(D)J-generated double-strand breaks

Loss or addition of nucleotides at junctions generated by V(D)J recombination significantly expands the antigen-receptor repertoire. Addition of nontemplated (N) nucleotides is carried out by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), whose only known physiological role is to create diversity at V(D)J junctions during lymphocyte development. Although purified TdT can act at free DNA ends, its ability to add nucleotides (i.e. form N regions) at coding joints appears to depend on the nonhomologous end-joining factor Ku80. Because the DNA ends generated during V(D)J rearrangements remain associated with the RAG proteins after cleavage, TdT might be targeted for N region addition through interactions with RAG proteins or with Ku80 during remodeling of the post-cleavage complex. Such regulated access would help to prevent TdT from acting at other types of broken ends and degrading the fidelity of end joining. To test this hypothesis, we measured TdT's ability to add nucleotides to endonuclease-induced chromosomal and extrachromosomal breaks. In both cases TdT added nucleotides efficiently to the cleaved DNA ends. Strikingly, the frequency of N regions at non-V(D)J-generated ends was not dependent on Ku80. Thus our results suggest that Ku80 is required to allow TdT access to RAG post-cleavage complexes, providing support for the hypothesis that Ku is involved in disassembling or remodeling the post-cleavage complex. We also found that N regions were abnormally long in the absence of Ku80, indicating that Ku80 may regulate TdT's activity at DNA ends in vivo.