Chimeras of Dictyostelium myosin II head and neck domains with Acanthamoeba or chicken smooth muscle myosin II tail domain have greatly increased and unregulated actin-dependent MgATPase activity

The significance of sponges for comparative studies of developmental evolution

Sponges, ctenophores, placozoans, and cnidarians have key evolutionary significance in that they bracket the time interval during which organized animal tissues were first assembled, fundamental cell types originated (e.g., neurons and myocytes), and developmental patterning mechanisms evolved. Sponges in particular have often been viewed as living surrogates for early animal ancestors, largely due to similarities between their feeding cells (choanocytes) with choanoflagellates, the unicellular/colony-forming sister group to animals. Here, we evaluate these claims and highlight aspects of sponge biology with comparative value for understanding developmental evolution, irrespective of the purported antiquity of their body plan. Specifically, we argue that sponges strike a different balance between patterning and plasticity than other animals, and that environmental inputs may have prominence over genetically regulated developmental mechanisms. We then present a case study to illustrate how contractile epithelia in sponges can help unravel the complex ancestry of an ancient animal cell type, myocytes, which sponges lack. Sponges represent hundreds of millions of years of largely unexamined evolutionary experimentation within animals. Their phylogenetic placement lends them key significance for learning about the past, and their divergent biology challenges current views about the scope of animal cell and developmental biology. This article is characterized under: Comparative Development and Evolution > Evolutionary Novelties Comparative Development and Evolution > Body Plan Evolution.

Interacting-heads motif has been conserved as a mechanism of myosin II inhibition since before the origin of animals

Electron microscope studies have shown that the switched-off state of myosin II in muscle involves intramolecular interaction between the two heads of myosin and between one head and the tail. The interaction, seen in both myosin filaments and isolated molecules, inhibits activity by blocking actin-binding and ATPase sites on myosin. This interacting-heads motif is highly conserved, occurring in invertebrates and vertebrates, in striated, smooth, and nonmuscle myosin IIs, and in myosins regulated by both Ca²⁺ binding and regulatory light-chain phosphorylation. Our goal was to determine how early this motif arose by studying the structure of inhibited myosin II molecules from primitive animals and from earlier, unicellular species that predate animals. Myosin II from Cnidaria (sea anemones, jellyfish), the most primitive animals with muscles, and Porifera (sponges), the most primitive of all animals (lacking muscle tissue) showed the same interacting-heads structure as myosins from higher animals, confirming the early origin of the motif. The social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum showed a similar, but modified, version of the motif, while the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) showed no head-head interaction, consistent with the different sequences and regulatory mechanisms of these myosins compared with animal myosin IIs. Our results suggest that head-head/head-tail interactions have been conserved, with slight modifications, as a mechanism for regulating myosin II activity from the emergence of the first animals and before. The early origins of these interactions highlight their importance in generating the inhibited (relaxed) state of myosin in muscle and nonmuscle cells.

Protein co-evolution: how do we combine bioinformatics and experimental approaches?

Molecular co-evolution is manifested by compensatory changes in proteins designed to enable adaptation to their natural environment. In recent years, bioinformatics approaches allowed for the detection of co-evolution at the level of the whole protein or of specific residues. Such efforts enabled prediction of protein-protein interactions, functional assignments of proteins and the identification of interacting residues, thereby providing information on protein structure. Still, despite such advances, relatively little is known regarding the functional implications of sequence divergence resulting from protein co-evolution. While bioinformatics approaches usually analyze thousands of proteins to obtain a broad view of protein co-evolution, experimental evaluation of protein co-evolution serves to study only individual proteins. In this review, we describe recent advances in bioinformatics and experimental efforts aimed at examining protein co-evolution. Accordingly, we discuss possible modes of crosstalk between the bioinformatics and experimental approaches to facilitate the identification of co-evolutionary signals in proteins and to understand their implications for the structure and function of proteins.

Bioinformatics assessment of beta-myosin mutations reveals myosin's high sensitivity to mutations

More than 200 mutations in the beta-myosin gene (MYH7) that cause clinically distinct cardiac and/or skeletal myopathies have been reported, but to date, no comprehensive statistical analysis of these mutations has been performed. As a part of this review, we developed a new interactive database and research tool called MyoMAPR (Myopathic Mutation Analysis Profiler and Repository). We report that the distribution of mutations along the beta-myosin gene is not homogeneous, and that myosin is a highly constrained molecule with an uncommon sensitivity to amino acid substitutions. Increasing knowledge of the characteristics of MH7 mutations may provide a valuable resource for scientists and clinicians studying diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of disease associated with these mutations.

Mitochondria-specific Function of the Dynamin Family Protein DLP1 Is Mediated by Its C-terminal Domains

The dynamin superfamily of large GTPases has been implicated in a variety of distinct intracellular membrane remodeling events. One of these family members, DLP1/Drp1, is similar to conventional dynamins as it contains an N-terminal GTPase domain followed by a middle region (MID), an unconserved region (UC), and a coiled-coil (CC) domain. DLP1 has been shown to function in membrane-based processes distinct from conventional dynamin, most notably mitochondrial fission. In this study, we tested whether the functional specificities of DLP1 and dynamin stems from differences in the individual domains of these proteins by generating dynamin/DLP1 chimeras in which correlate domains had been interchanged. Here we report that three consecutive C-terminal domains of DLP1 (MID-UC-CC) contain information necessary for DLP1-specific function and removing any one of these domains results in a loss of DLP1 function. Importantly, the coiled-coil (CC) domain of DLP1 alone targets specifically and exclusively to mitochondria, implicating its involvement in localizing DLP1 to this organelle in vivo. The mitochondrial targeting information within the DLP1 CC domain is not sufficient to retarget dynamin to mitochondria but is still able to adequately function as an assembly domain in a dynamin background. These data suggest that whereas the GTPase domain of DLP1 provides an enzymatic function, other domains contain information for intermolecular assembly and mitochondrial targeting.

Tail chimeras of Dictyostelium myosin II support cytokinesis and other myosin II activities but not full development

Dictyostelium lacking myosin II cannot grow in suspension culture, develop beyond the mound stage or cap concanavalin A receptors and chemotaxis is impaired. Recently, we showed that the actin-activated MgATPase activity of myosin chimeras in which the tail domain of Dictyostelium myosin II heavy chain is replaced by the tail domain of either Acanthamoeba or chicken smooth muscle myosin II is unregulated and about 20 times higher than wild-type myosin. The Acanthamoeba chimera forms short bipolar filaments similar to, but shorter than, filaments of Dictyostelium myosin and the smooth muscle chimera forms much larger side-polar filaments. We now find that the Acanthamoeba chimera expressed in myosin null cells localizes to the periphery of vegetative amoeba similarly to wild-type myosin but the smooth muscle chimera is heavily concentrated in a single cortical patch. Despite their different tail sequences and filament structures and different localization of the smooth muscle chimera in interphase cells, both chimeras support growth in suspension culture and concanavalin A capping and colocalize with the ConA cap but the Acanthamoeba chimera subsequently disperses more slowly than wild-type myosin and the smooth muscle chimera apparently not at all. Both chimeras also partially rescue chemotaxis. However, neither supports full development. Thus, neither regulation of myosin activity, nor regulation of myosin polymerization nor bipolar filaments is required for many functions of Dictyostelium myosin II and there may be no specific sequence required for localization of myosin to the cleavage furrow.

Regulation of nonmuscle myosins by heavy chain phosphorylation

Functional activities of many nonmuscle myosin isoforms are (or are postulated to be) regulated by heavy chain phosphorylation. Depending on the myosin isoform, the serine or threonine residues located within the head (myosin I or myosin VI) or within the C-terminal tail domains (myosin II or myosin V) can be phosphorylated by more or less specific endogenous kinases. In some isoforms phosphorylation can occur both in the head and tail domains, as it has been found for myosin III. There are also isoforms that can be regulated both by the heavy and regulatory light chain phosphorylation, as for the example myosin II from slide mold Dictyostelium discoideum. The goal of this review was to describe recent findings on regulation of myosin I, myosin II, myosin III, myosin V and myosin VI isoforms by their heavy chain phosphorylation including the short charcteristics of the relevant kinases. The biological aspects of the phosphorylation are also discussed.

Coevolution of head, neck, and tail domains of myosin heavy chains

Myosins, a large family of actin-based motors, have one or two heavy chains with one or more light chains associated with each heavy chain. The heavy chains have a (generally) N-terminal head domain with an ATPase and actin-binding site, followed by a neck domain to which the light chains bind, and a C-terminal tail domain through which the heavy chains self-associate and/or bind the myosin to its cargo. Approximately 140 members of the myosin superfamily have been grouped into 17 classes based on the sequences of their head domains. I now show that a phylogenetic tree based on the sequences of the combined neck and tail domains groups 144 myosins, with a few exceptions, into the same 17 classes. For the nine myosin classes that have multiple members, phylogenetic trees based on the head domain or the combined neck/tail domains are either identical or very similar. For class II myosins, very similar phylogenetic trees are obtained for the head, neck, and tail domains of 47 heavy chains and for 29 essential light chains and 19 regulatory light chains. These data strongly suggest that the head, neck, and tail domains of all myosin heavy chains, and light chains at least of class II myosins, have coevolved and are likely to be functionally interdependent, consistent with biochemical evidence showing that regulated actin-dependent MgATPase activity of Dictyostelium myosin II requires isoform specific interactions between the heavy chain head and tail and light chains.