Electron microscopy of gene regulation: the L-arabinose operon

A Career's Work, the l-Arabinose Operon: How It Functions and How We Learned It

Very few labs have had the good fortune to have been able to focus for more than 50 years on a relatively narrow research topic and to be in a field in which both basic knowledge and the research technology and methods have progressed as rapidly as they have in molecular biology. My research group, first at Brandeis University and then at Johns Hopkins University, has had this opportunity. In this review, therefore, I will describe largely the work from my laboratory that has spanned this period and which was carried out by 40 plus graduate students, several postdoctoral associates, my technician, and me. In addition to presenting the scientific findings or results, I will place many of the topics in scientific context and, because we needed to develop a good many of the experimental methods behind our findings, I will also describe some of these methods and their importance. Also included will be occasional comments on how the research community or my research group functioned. Because a wide variety of approaches were used throughout our work, no ideal organization of this review is apparent. Therefore, I have chosen to use a hybrid structure in which there are six sections. Within each of the sections, experiments and findings will be described roughly in chronological order. Frequent cross references between parts and sections will be made because some findings and experimental approaches could logically have been described in more than one place.

Evolution of Regulated Transcription

The genomes of all organisms abound with various cis-regulatory elements, which control gene activity. Transcriptional enhancers are a key group of such elements in eukaryotes and are DNA regions that form physical contacts with gene promoters and precisely orchestrate gene expression programs. Here, we follow gradual evolution of this regulatory system and discuss its features in different organisms. In eubacteria, an enhancer-like element is often a single regulatory element, is usually proximal to the core promoter, and is occupied by one or a few activators. Activation of gene expression in archaea is accompanied by the recruitment of an activator to several enhancer-like sites in the upstream promoter region. In eukaryotes, activation of expression is accompanied by the recruitment of activators to multiple enhancers, which may be distant from the core promoter, and the activators act through coactivators. The role of the general DNA architecture in transcription control increases in evolution. As a whole, it can be seen that enhancers of multicellular eukaryotes evolved from the corresponding prototypic enhancer-like regulatory elements with the gradually increasing genome size of organisms.

AraC protein, regulation of the l-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli, and the light switch mechanism of AraC action

This review covers the physiological aspects of regulation of the arabinose operon in Escherichia coli and the physical and regulatory properties of the operon's controlling gene, araC. It also describes the light switch mechanism as an explanation for many of the protein's properties. Although many thousands of homologs of AraC exist and regulate many diverse operons in response to many different inducers or physiological states, homologs that regulate arabinose-catabolizing genes in response to arabinose were identified. The sequence similarities among them are discussed in light of the known structure of the dimerization and DNA-binding domains of AraC.

The Escherichia coli L-arabinose operon: binding sites of the regulatory proteins and a mechanism of positive and negative regulation

The locations of DNA binding by the proteins involved with positive and negative regulation of transcription initiation of the L-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli have been determined by the DNase I protection method. Two cyclic AMP receptor protein sites were found, at positions -78 to -107 and -121 to -146, an araC protein--arabinose binding site was found at position -40 to -78, and an araC protein-fucose binding site was found at position -106 to -144. These locations, combined with in vivo data on induction of the two divergently oriented arabinose promoters, suggest the following regulatory mechanism: induction of the araBAD operon occurs when cyclic AMP receptor protein, araC protein, and RNA polymerase are all present and able to bind to DNA. Negative regulation is accomplished by the repressing form of araC protein binding to a site in the regulatory region such that it stimultaneously blocks access of cyclic AMP receptor protein to two sites on the DNA, one site of which serves each of the two promoters. Thus, from a single operator site, the negative regulator represses the two outwardly oriented ara promoters. This regulatory mechanism explains the known positive and negative regulatory properties of the ara promoters.

The glucocorticoid domain of response: measurement of pleiotropic cellular responses by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

In this article, we have provided two examples of pleiotropic regulation by specific effector molecules as assayed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. In one case, catabolite repression in the bacterium Escherichia coli was examined by measuring the response to cyclic cAMP. In the other, the effect of dexamethasone on the rate of synthesis of over a thousand cell proteins was analyzed in HTC cells. It was found that in E. coli, cAMP regulates the synthesis of about 10 percent of the cell's proteins; both inductions and repressions are observed, but inductions clearly predominate. In HTC cells, dexamethasone induces the synthesis of seven proteins, or about 0.7 percent of the total cellular proteins; repression was not consistently observed. In another rat hepatoma line (FAZA) a similar number but essentially different set of proteins was induced. These data are discussed in terms of the notion of domains of response originally proposed by TOMKINS [1].

The regulatory region of the biotin operon in Escherichia coli

It is proposed that the biotin anabolic operon in Escherichia coli is transcribed divergently from two partially overlapping face-to-face promoters. A mutation that increases transcription in vivo creates an additional promoter in vitro. The putative operator contains an imperfect palindromic sequence that partially overlaps the promoters. The regulatory and genetic implications of these findings are discussed.

Regulatory properties of araC(c) mutants in the L-arabinose operon of escherichia coliB/r

Merodiploids containing a high-constitutive and a low-constitutive araC(c) allele were assayed for constitutive expression of the ara operon. Low-constitutive araC(c) alleles either were unable to repress the constitutive rate of ara operon expression exhibited by by high-constitutive araC(c) alleles or achieved a partial repression of the high-constitutive rate of operon expression. Either mutation to a low-constitutive araC(c) mutant resulted in a partial or complete loss of repressor function, or subunit mixing between the two araC(c) mutant proteins resulted in a partial or complete dominance of the high-constitutive araC(c) allele. Five of the six araC(c) alleles tested allowed a partial induction of the ara operon in cya crp background. In general, a higher level of ara operon induction was achieved in the cya crp background by high araC(c) alleles than by low araC(c) alleles. Furthermore, several araC(c) mutants exhibited decreased sensitivity to catabolite repression, particularly in the presence of inducer. The results suggest a model in which certain araC(c) gene products can achieve ara operon induction in the presence of either arabinose (inducer) or catabolite activator protein-cyclic adenosine monophosphate, whereas the wild-type araC gene product requires the presence of both of these factors for operon expression.

Overproducing araC protein with lambda-arabinose transducing phage

Escherichia coli infected with bacteriophage lambda-arabinose transducing phage were tested as sources of araC protein. Infection of cells with such phage produces an intracellular concentration of araC protein up to 100 times that present in wild-type E. coli, apparently resulting from fusion of the araC gene to bacteriophage lambda promoters. Lysates from these phage-infected cells may be fractionated to yield another 100-fold enrichment in araC activity so that the total enrichment is 10,000-fold. A nonsense mutation in araC provided proof of the identification on gel electrophoresis of a band in the purified material. Biologically active araC protein is a dimer with 28,000 M.W. subunits. The araC gene in these phage replaces the int-xis genes but is oriented in the opposite direction. Nonetheless, it appears to be transcribed in this position by the phage promoter pr via transcription the long way around. Furthermore, because araC gene is in this position, we were able to isolate phage on which the araC gene was under phage late gene control by deletion of the late gene transcription stop signals in the b2 region.

Mutations in the L-arabinose operon of Escherichia coli B/r with reduced initiator function

Partial reversion mutants derived from a strain containing a strongly polar initiator-defective mutation (araI1036) in the L-arabinose operon were found to have several characteristics expected of mutants with reduced initiator function. These reversion mutations are cotransduced with the ara region and are probably within the araI region. Furthermore, they permit induction of the L-arabinose operon to a level only one-third of the normal wild-type level. These partially functional initiator regions reduce the expression of structural genes in the cis position only; they function quite independently of wild-type or defective initiator regions in the trans position. These mutants exhibit a two- to threefold increase in the rate of expression of ara operon genes within one-tenth of a generation after a shift of the growth temperature from 28 to 42 degrees C. This suggests that the temperature optimum for initiation of operon expression is higher for the partial revertant strains than it is for strains containing a wild-type initiator region.