Most of the G1 period in hamster cells is eliminated by lengthening the S period

The mechanism of oocyte activation influences the cell cycle-related genes expression during bovine preimplantation development

The first cleavage divisions and preimplantation embryonic development are supported by mRNA and proteins synthesized and stored during oogenesis. Thus, mRNA molecules of maternal origin decrease and embryonic development becomes gradually dependent on expression of genetic information derived from the embryonic genome. However, it is still unclear what the role of the sperm cell is during this phase and whether the absence of the sperm cell during the artificial oocyte activation affects subsequent embryonic development. The objective of this study was to determine, in bovine embryos, changes in cell cycle-associated transcript levels (cyclin A, cyclin B, cyclin E, CDC2, CDK2, and CDK4) after oocyte activation in the presence or absence of the sperm cell. To evaluate that, in vitro-produced (IVP) and parthenogenetically activated (PA) embryos (2-4 cells (2-4C), 8-16 cells (8-16C) and blastocysts) were evaluated by real-time PCR. There was no difference in cleavage and blastocyst rates between IVP and PA groups. Transcript level was higher in oocytes than in IVP and PA embryos. Cleaved PA embryos showed higher expression of cyclin A, cyclin B, cyclin E, and CDK2 and lower expression of CDC2 when compared with that from the IVP group. At the time of activation, all transcripts were expressed less in PA than in IVP embryos, whereas at the blastocyst stage, almost all genes were expressed at a higher level in the PA group. These results suggest that in both groups there is an initial consumption of these transcripts in the early stages of embryonic development. Furthermore, 8-16C embryos seem to synthesize more cell cycle-related genes than 2-4C embryos. However, in PA embryos, activation of the cell cycle genes seems to occur after the 8- to 16-cell stage, suggesting a failure in the activation process.

A replication stress-induced synchronization method for Arabidopsis thaliana root meristems

Synchronized cell cultures are an indispensable tool for the identification and understanding of key regulators of the cell cycle. Nevertheless, the use of cell cultures has its disadvantages, because it represents an artificial system that does not completely mimic the endogenous conditions that occur in organized meristems. Here, we present a new and easy method for Arabidopsis thaliana root tip synchronization by hydroxyurea treatment. A major advantage of the method is the possibility of investigating available Arabidopsis cell-cycle mutants without the need to generate cell cultures. As a proof of concept, the effects of over-expression of a dominant negative allele of the B-type cyclin-dependent kinase CDKB1;1 gene on cell-cycle progression were tested. The previously observed prolonged G₂ phase was confirmed, but was found to be compensated for by a reduced G₁ phase. Furthermore, altered S-phase kinetics indicated a functional role for CDKB1;1 during the replication process.

Selection of mammalian cells based on their cell-cycle phase using dielectrophoresis

An effective, noninvasive means of selecting cells based on their phase within the cell cycle is an important capability for biological research. Current methods of producing synchronous cell populations, however, tend to disrupt the natural physiology of the cell or suffer from low synchronization yields. In this work, we report a microfluidic device that utilizes the dielectrophoresis phenomenon to synchronize cells by exploiting the relationship between the cell's volume and its phase in the cell cycle. The dielectrophoresis activated cell synchronizer (DACSync) device accepts an asynchronous mixture of cells at the inlet, fractionates the cell populations according to the cell-cycle phase (G(1)/S and G(2)/M), and elutes them through different outlets. The device is gentle and efficient; it utilizes electric fields that are 1-2 orders of magnitude below those used in electroporation and enriches asynchronous tumor cells in the G(1) phase to 96% in one round of sorting, in a continuous flow manner at a throughput of 2 x 10(5) cells per hour per microchannel. This work illustrates the feasibility of using laminar flow and electrokinetic forces for the efficient, noninvasive separation of living cells.

How cells coordinate growth and division

Size is a fundamental attribute impacting cellular design, fitness, and function. Size homeostasis requires a doubling of cell mass with each division. In yeast, division is delayed until a critical size has been achieved. In metazoans, cell cycles can be actively coupled to growth, but in certain cell types extracellular signals may independently induce growth and division. Despite a long history of study, the fascinating mechanisms that control cell size have resisted molecular genetic insight. Recently, genetic screens in Drosophila and functional genomics approaches in yeast have macheted into the thicket of cell size control.

The G1 interval in the mammalian cell cycle: dual control by mass accumulation and stage-specific activities

The temporal determinants of the G1 cell cycle interval were investigated using nine mammalian cell lines. In each case, cells were allowed to proliferate for many cell cycles under conditions that slowed progress through S phase without an equivalent impairment of overall mass accumulation. This disproportionate inhibition of progress through the cell cycle caused newly produced cells to be more massive than usual. Under these growth conditions, the determinants of the length of the G1 interval became evident. For two cell lines, HeLa S3 and NIH 3T3, a protracted S phase, and the resultant increase in mass, resulted in a dramatically shortened G1 interval. Thus, for these cell lines, a major portion of G1 time exists to accommodate mass accumulation needed to initiate the subsequent S phase. Nevertheless, under conditions that protracted S phase and shortened the G1 interval, cells still exhibited a measurable G1 time, reflecting the stage-specific activities within G1. One activity that may be responsible for this obligatory G1 time is the synthesis of a labile protein. For other cells studied here, protraction of S phase also caused proliferating cells to become more massive, but in these cases there was no diminution of the G1 time. For these cells, the entire G1 interval must accommodate G1-specific activities necessary to initiate a new cell cycle. A unifying view of the G1 interval recognizes the two distinct influences that determine the time spent in G1: the need to accumulate sufficient mass to initiate a new DNA-division sequence; and the stage-specific events necessary for the subsequent S phase. The length of the G1 interval is dictated by the longer of these two time-consuming activities.

Cell kinetic disturbances induced by treatment of human diploid fibroblasts with 5-azacytidine indicate a major role for DNA methylation in the regulation of the chromosome cycle

BrdU-Hoechst flow cytometry was used to investigate the effects of DNA hypomethylation, induced by treatment with 5-azacytidine (5AC), on cell proliferation. When human fibroblast-like cells derived from skin and amniotic fluid were exposed to 5AC during three successive cell cycles, their clone-forming ability was diminished after removal of the drug. Treated cells were rendered quiescent by culture with low serum in the absence of the drug. Upon serum stimulation, they showed a diminished fraction of proliferating cells, which exhibited a prolonged transit through the S and G2 phase of the cell cycle, and a permanent arrest within the G2 compartment. This pattern of disturbed cell proliferation may in part explain the changes in replication banding pattern reported in the literature. Cytogenetic analysis of 5AC-treated cells revealed numerous endomitoses and tetraploid metaphases indicating a disturbed chromosome cycle in association with these cell kinetic perturbations.

Effects of inhibition of RNA or protein synthesis on CHO cell cycle progression

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, synchronized by selective detachment at mitosis, were treated with various concentrations of actinomycin D (AMD) or cycloheximide (CHX) either immediately, or 1, 2, or 3 hr after mitosis. Since the minimum duration of G1 phase in these cultures was 3.4 hr, the addition of RNA or protein synthesis inhibitors took place at the beginning, first third, second third, or end (G1-S boundary) of G1 phase. The kinetics of exit from G1 phase, the rate and extent of traverse of S phase, and the reaccumulation of RNA were estimated under each set of growth conditions by flow cytometry of acridine orange-stained cells. A mathematical model was constructed to describe the trajectories of the cell populations with respect to their increase in RNA and DNA content in the absence or presence of the inhibitor. The chronologic synchrony imposed on the CHO cell population began to decay within 3 hr, resulting in stochastic entrance of cells into S phase in the absence of inhibitor. Addition of AMD or CHX at 0, 1, 2, or 3 hr after mitosis, regardless of the inhibitor concentration, did not provide evidence of a critical restriction point in G1 beyond which cells were committed to enter S phase and were no longer sensitive to moderate suppression of RNA or protein synthesis. The observed kinetics of cell entrance into an traverse of S phase were consistent with an inherently heterogeneous response to serum stimulation occurring at or just after cell division.

Mechanism for differential sensitivity of the chromosome and growth cycles of mammalian cells to the rate of protein synthesis

It has been documented widely that when the generation times of eucaryotic cells are lengthened by slowing the rate of protein synthesis, the duration of the chromosome cycle (S, G2, and M phases) remains relatively invariant. Paradoxically, when the growth of exponentially growing cultures of CHO cells is partially inhibited with inhibitors of protein synthesis, the immediate effect is a proportionate reduction in the rate of total protein, histone protein, and DNA synthesis. However, on further investigation it was found that over the next 2 h the rates of histone protein and DNA synthesis recover, in some cases completely to the uninhibited rate, while the synthesis rates of other proteins do not recover. We called this process chromosome cycle compensation. The amount of compensation seen in CHO cell cultures can account quantitatively for the relative invariance in the length of the chromosome cycle (S, G2, and M phases) reported for these cells. The mechanism for this compensation involves a specific increase in the levels of histone mRNAs. An invariant chromosome cycle coupled with a lengthening growth cycle must result in a disproportionate lengthening of the G1 phase. Thus, these results suggest that chromosome cycle invariance may be due more to specific cellular compensation mechanisms rather than to the more usual interpretation involving a rate-limiting step for cell cycle progression in the G1 phase.

Mechanism for differential sensitivity of the chromosome and growth cycles of mammalian cells to the rate of protein synthesis

It has been documented widely that when the generation times of eucaryotic cells are lengthened by slowing the rate of protein synthesis, the duration of the chromosome cycle (S, G2, and M phases) remains relatively invariant. Paradoxically, when the growth of exponentially growing cultures of CHO cells is partially inhibited with inhibitors of protein synthesis, the immediate effect is a proportionate reduction in the rate of total protein, histone protein, and DNA synthesis. However, on further investigation it was found that over the next 2 h the rates of histone protein and DNA synthesis recover, in some cases completely to the uninhibited rate, while the synthesis rates of other proteins do not recover. We called this process chromosome cycle compensation. The amount of compensation seen in CHO cell cultures can account quantitatively for the relative invariance in the length of the chromosome cycle (S, G2, and M phases) reported for these cells. The mechanism for this compensation involves a specific increase in the levels of histone mRNAs. An invariant chromosome cycle coupled with a lengthening growth cycle must result in a disproportionate lengthening of the G1 phase. Thus, these results suggest that chromosome cycle invariance may be due more to specific cellular compensation mechanisms rather than to the more usual interpretation involving a rate-limiting step for cell cycle progression in the G1 phase.

Endogenous blockage and delay of the chromosome cycle despite normal recruitment and growth phase explain poor proliferation and frequent edomitosis in Fanconi anemia cells

BrdU-Hoechst flow cytometry was employed to study the proliferation kinetics of blood lymphocytes from patients with Fanconi anemia (FA). Compared to controls, untreated FA lymphocytes show normal response to PHA stimulation, normal G0/G1 exit rates, and normal first S-phase durations. The G2 phase of the first cell cycle, however, is severely prolonged, and 24% of the recruited population become arrested during the first chromosome cycle (S, G2/M phases). The delay suffered during G2 appears to be compensated in part by a subsequent G1 phase duration that is unusually short for postnatal human cells (3.7 +/- 0.5 hrs). In analogy to what has been observed in other cell systems after experimental delays of the chromosome cycle, we therefore postulate that at least some FA cells enter their second growth phase without prior completion of the delayed chromosome cycle. Renewed replication would ensue in such cells without prior passing through mitosis and cytokinesis, leading to endoreduplication, which is a frequent finding in the FA syndrome.

Independent regulation by sodium butyrate of gonadotropin alpha gene expression and cell cycle progression in HeLa cells

Sodium butyrate alters the growth and gene expression of a variety of differentiating and neoplastic cell types. For example, addition of 5 mM butyrate to HeLa cells is reported to both induce gonadotropin alpha subunit biosynthesis and block cell cycling in G1. We have studied these two actions of butyrate on HeLa cells and found that they are regulated in distinct ways. The induction of alpha subunit synthesis was due to an increase in the rate of transcription of the alpha gene. Using synchronized populations of HeLa cells, we determined that butyrate stimulates alpha transcription throughout the cell cycle. In contrast, treated cells arrest in G1 only if exposed to butyrate for a discrete period during the previous S phase. We conclude that butyrate inhibits DNA synthesis through a cell cycle-specific action that is independent from its direct action to stimulate transcription of the gonadotropin alpha gene.

Independent regulation by sodium butyrate of gonadotropin alpha gene expression and cell cycle progression in HeLa cells

Sodium butyrate alters the growth and gene expression of a variety of differentiating and neoplastic cell types. For example, addition of 5 mM butyrate to HeLa cells is reported to both induce gonadotropin alpha subunit biosynthesis and block cell cycling in G1. We have studied these two actions of butyrate on HeLa cells and found that they are regulated in distinct ways. The induction of alpha subunit synthesis was due to an increase in the rate of transcription of the alpha gene. Using synchronized populations of HeLa cells, we determined that butyrate stimulates alpha transcription throughout the cell cycle. In contrast, treated cells arrest in G1 only if exposed to butyrate for a discrete period during the previous S phase. We conclude that butyrate inhibits DNA synthesis through a cell cycle-specific action that is independent from its direct action to stimulate transcription of the gonadotropin alpha gene.

The role of the G1 period in the life cycle of eukaryotic cells

The objective of this study was to test the concept that the G1 period lacks any specific function in the life cycle of mammalian cells and hence could be drastically reduced without any effect on the generation time. HeLa cells were grown in medium containing an optimum dose (60 microM) of hydroxyurea at which the duration of S period was prolonged with little or no increase in generation time. At this concentration of hydroxyurea, we observed a maximum of 3 h (or 28.5%) reduction in the G1 period. We also studied the effects of synchronization in S phase by single and double thymidine blocks on cell size and its relationship to the duration of G1 in the subsequent cycle. By these treatments, we could reduce the G1 period by not more than 2 to 3 h. The reduction in G1 period was not directly proportional to the size (volume) of the G1 cells. These results suggest that G1 period has certain specific functions and cannot be eliminated by alterations in culture conditions.

Identification of key regulated events early in the life of hybrid animal cells constructed by nuclear transplantation

Reconstituted cells were constructed by fusion of cytoplasts from the human diploid fibroblast cell strain Detroit 532 and karyoplasts from the mouse fibroblast cell line A9. Several cellular properties were examined during the first 48 hr after nuclear transplantation. (i) The overall morphology of the cells originally resembled that of the cytoplasmic donor, Detroit 532, but rapidly changed to approximate that of the nuclear donor, A9. However, definitive changes in the microfilament structure of the reconstituted cells were not seen until 24-48 hr after fusion. These observations support the idea that the presence or absence of an ordered array of microfilament bundles is not the sole determinant of cell shape. (ii) Although cytoplasts and karyoplasts were prepared from cultures of randomly growing cells, the first division of reconstituted cells occurred in a synchronous manner. However, the initiation of DNA synthesis was not synchronized. It thus appeared that, in their first cell cycle, the cells had a G2 period of variable length. The results further suggest that the cytoplasm of interphase fibroblasts contains the material necessary to initiate or support DNA synthesis in a transplanted nucleus but not entry into mitosis. (iii) A two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis of polypeptide synthesis in reconstituted cell cultures showed that synthesis directed by transplanted mouse nuclei could be detected as early as 3-6 hr after fusion. Some of the mouse polypeptides detected at the earliest time points studied were not among the major polypeptides synthesized by the parental A9 cells. By about 48 hr after fusion, the pattern of polypeptides produced by reconstituted cells was almost indistinguishable from that of the nuclear donor parent cells.

Effects of hydroxyurea on DNA synthesis in hairless mouse epidermis

The effect of 5 mg hydroxyurea (HU) i.p. on epidermal DNA synthesis in female hairless mice was assessed by measuring labelling indices and specific activity after 3HTdR injection, flow cytometry (FCM) and cell sorting of prelabelled basal cells. HU causes an almost immediate block in DNA synthesis lasting until 2-2.5 h. During this time the fraction of cells in S remains stationary, 1.20 of normal. From 2.5 to 12.5 h DNA synthesis is resumed, but in cells recruited from G1 or G0. The HU-blocked cells do not move out of S until after 12.5 h. Hence, from 2.5 to 12.5 h, the fraction of cells in S increases to 2.5 of normal, which means that entry into S is open, but exit is blocked. From 12.5 h flux through S is high. The blocked cells are now released and the fraction of cells in S falls to 0.7 of normal at 24.5 h. At 36.5 h a probable new wave of DNA synthesis is indicated. The results also show that 3HTdR is available for at least 20 min after i.p. injection. The consequences of these results for the interpretation of the effect of HU pretreatment on methylnitrosourea skin carcinogenesis are discussed.

The relation between protein accumulation and cell cycle traverse of human NHIK 3025 cells in unbalanced growth

Human NHIK 3025 cells, synchronized by mitotic selection, were given 2 mM thymidine, which inhibited DNA synthesis without reducing the rate of protein accumulation. After removal of the thymidine the cells proceeded towards mitosis and cell division, with an S duration 2 hours shorter than, but a G2 and M duration nearly identical to that of the control cells. If cycloheximide (1.25 muM) was present together with thymidine, no net protein accumulation took place during the treatment, and the subsequent duration of S, G2, and M was similar to that of untreated cells. The shortening of S seen after treatment with thymidine alone would therefore indicate that the rate of DNA synthesis depended on the amount of some preaccumulated protein. The postreplicative period in thymidine-treated cells was lengthened by cycloheximide treatment although the protein content had already been doubled. This suggests that proteins required for the traverse of this part of the cell cycle might have to be synthesized after completion of DNA replication. Shortly after removal of thymidine, the rate of protein accumulation declined markedly, indicating the existence of some mechanism for negative control of cell mass. In addition, the daughters of thymidine-treated cells had their cell cycle shortened by 2 hours. As a result, the cells had returned to balanced growth already in the first cell cycle following the induction of unbalanced growth. In conclusion, our experiments suggest that NHIK 3025 cells might require a minimum time in order to traverse the cell cycle, which is independent of cell mass.