Purification and properties of the uvrA protein from Escherichia coli

The UvrA-like protein Ecm16 requires ATPase activity to render resistance against echinomycin

Bacteria use various strategies to become antibiotic resistant. The molecular details of these strategies are not fully understood. We can increase our understanding by investigating the same strategies found in antibiotic‐producing bacteria. In this work, we characterize the self‐resistance protein Ecm16 encoded by echinomycin‐producing bacteria. Ecm16 is a structural homolog of the nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA. Expression of ecm16 in the heterologous system Escherichia coli was sufficient to render resistance against echinomycin. Ecm16 binds DNA (double‐stranded and single‐stranded) using a nucleotide‐independent binding mode. Ecm16’s binding affinity for DNA increased by 1.7‐fold when the DNA is intercalated with echinomycin. Ecm16 can render resistance against echinomycin toxicity independently of the nucleotide excision repair system. Similar to UvrA, Ecm16 has ATPase activity, and this activity is essential for Ecm16’s ability to render echinomycin resistance. Notably, UvrA and Ecm16 were unable to complement each other's function. Together, our findings identify new mechanistic details of how a refurbished DNA repair protein Ecm16 can specifically render resistance to the DNA intercalator echinomycin.

Single molecule iSCAT imaging reveals a fast, energy efficient search mode for the DNA repair protein UvrA

Exposure to UV radiation results in numerous DNA lesions, which threaten genome integrity. The nucleotide excision DNA repair pathway detects and repairs a range of such UV-induced DNA lesions. In bacteria, initial damage detection and verification is carried out by two proteins: UvrA and UvrB. Despite decades of study, the process of how these proteins locate damage remains unclear. Here we use high-speed interferometric scattering (iSCAT) microscopy, in combination with a surface-bound-DNA assay, to investigate early damage detection by UvrA. We have discovered that UvrA interacts with DNA in two phases; a slow phase (∼1.3 s^-1) that correlates with an ATP-consuming state previously identified, and a second, much faster search mode. These faster interactions persist for ∼130 ms and using ATP analogues we determine this phase does not require ATP consumption. Including this new fast-search state in a model of the DNA search process reveals that only with this state is it possible for basal levels of UvrA to explore 99% of the E. coli genome within a single division cycle. Altogether, this work uncovers the presence of a rapid, energy efficient search mechanism, which allows UvrA alone to search the entirety of the E. coli genome within a single division cycle.

A Peek Inside the Machines of Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Double stranded DNA (dsDNA), the repository of genetic information in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes, exhibits a surprising instability in the intracellular environment; this fragility is exacerbated by exogenous agents, such as ultraviolet radiation. To protect themselves against the severe consequences of DNA damage, cells have evolved at least six distinct DNA repair pathways. Here, we review recent key findings of studies aimed at understanding one of these pathways: bacterial nucleotide excision repair (NER). This pathway operates in two modes: a global genome repair (GGR) pathway and a pathway that closely interfaces with transcription by RNA polymerase called transcription-coupled repair (TCR). Below, we discuss the architecture of key proteins in bacterial NER and recent biochemical, structural and single-molecule studies that shed light on the lesion recognition steps of both the GGR and the TCR sub-pathways. Although a great deal has been learned about both of these sub-pathways, several important questions, including damage discrimination, roles of ATP and the orchestration of protein binding and conformation switching, remain to be addressed.

Methodologies for detecting environmentally induced DNA damage and repair

Environmental DNA damaging agents continuously challenge the integrity of the genome by introducing a variety of DNA lesions. The DNA damage caused by environmental factors will lead to mutagenesis and subsequent carcinogenesis if they are not removed efficiently by repair pathways. Methods for detection of DNA damage and repair can be applied to identify, visualize, and quantify the DNA damage formation and repair events, and they enable us to illustrate the molecular mechanisms of DNA damage formation, DNA repair pathways, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis. Ever since the discovery of the double helical structure of DNA in 1953, a great number of methods have been developed to detect various types of DNA damage and repair. Rapid advances in sequencing technologies have facilitated the emergence of a variety of novel methods for detecting environmentally induced DNA damage and repair at the genome-wide scale during the last decade. In this review, we provide a historical overview of the development of various damage detection methods. We also highlight the current methodologies to detect DNA damage and repair, especially some next generation sequencing-based methods.

Understanding the coupling between DNA damage detection and UvrA's ATPase using bulk and single molecule kinetics

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) protects cells against diverse types of DNA damage, principally UV irradiation. In Escherichia coli, damage is recognized by 2 key enzymes: UvrA and UvrB. Despite extensive investigation, the role of UvrA’s 2 ATPase domains in NER remains elusive. Combining single-molecule fluorescence microscopy and classic biochemical methods, we have investigated the role of nucleotide binding in UvrA’s kinetic cycle. Measurement of UvrA’s steady-state ATPase activity shows it is stimulated upon binding DNA (k_cat 0.71–1.07/s). Despite UvrA’s ability to discriminate damage, we find UV-damaged DNA does not alter the steady-state ATPase. To understand how damage affects UvrA, we studied its binding to DNA under various nucleotide conditions at the single molecule level. We have found that both UV damage and nucleotide cofactors affect the attached lifetime of UvrA. In the presence of ATP and UV damage, the lifetime is significantly greater compared with undamaged DNA. To reconcile these observations, we suggest that UvrA uses negative cooperativity between its ATPase sites that is gated by damage recognition. Only in the presence of damage is the second site activated, most likely in a sequential manner.—Barnett, J. T., Kad, N. M. Understanding the coupling between DNA damage detection and UvrA’s ATPase using bulk and single molecule kinetics.

Direct DNA Lesion Reversal and Excision Repair in Escherichia coli

Cellular DNA is constantly challenged by various endogenous and exogenous genotoxic factors that inevitably lead to DNA damage: structural and chemical modifications of primary DNA sequence. These DNA lesions are either cytotoxic, because they block DNA replication and transcription, or mutagenic due to the miscoding nature of the DNA modifications, or both, and are believed to contribute to cell lethality and mutagenesis. Studies on DNA repair in Escherichia coli spearheaded formulation of principal strategies to counteract DNA damage and mutagenesis, such as: direct lesion reversal, DNA excision repair, mismatch and recombinational repair and genotoxic stress signalling pathways. These DNA repair pathways are universal among cellular organisms. Mechanistic principles used for each repair strategies are fundamentally different. Direct lesion reversal removes DNA damage without need for excision and de novo DNA synthesis, whereas DNA excision repair that includes pathways such as base excision, nucleotide excision, alternative excision and mismatch repair, proceeds through phosphodiester bond breakage, de novo DNA synthesis and ligation. Cell signalling systems, such as adaptive and oxidative stress responses, although not DNA repair pathways per se, are nevertheless essential to counteract DNA damage and mutagenesis. The present review focuses on the nature of DNA damage, direct lesion reversal, DNA excision repair pathways and adaptive and oxidative stress responses in E. coli.

Compromised DNA damage repair promotes genetic instability of the genomic magnetosome island in Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1

Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are capable of synthesizing nano-sized, intracellular membrane-bound magnetosomes. To learn more about the genetic factors involved in magnetosome formation, transposon mutagenesis was carried out by conjugation using a hyperactive mariner transposon to obtain nonmagnetic mutants of Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1. A mutant with defect in uvrA gene encoding the DNA binding subunit of the UvrABC complex responsible for the process of nucleotide excision repair, was obtained. Growth, magnetosome formation and maintenance of magnetosome island (MAI) were further analyzed in the absence of UvrA. Interruption of uvrA led to decreased capacity to form magnetosome when cultured in the presence of oxygen. The deficiency in UvrA also resulted in an accelerated loss of the MAI under aerobic conditions indicating that the nucleotide excision repair system guards against the instability of the MAI. The incapacity of MTB to efficiently initiate recombination mediated by RecA rescued the instability of MAI observed in uvrA mutant. Elevated recombination activity resulting from the accumulation of unrepaired mutations may thus account for the instability of MAI in the absence of UvrA.

The biological and structural characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrA provides novel insights into its mechanism of action

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is an extremely well adapted intracellular human pathogen that is exposed to multiple DNA damaging chemical assaults originating from the host defence mechanisms. As a consequence, this bacterium is thought to possess highly efficient DNA repair machineries, the nucleotide excision repair (NER) system amongst these. Although NER is of central importance to DNA repair in M. tuberculosis, our understanding of the processes in this species is limited. The conserved UvrABC endonuclease represents the multi-enzymatic core in bacterial NER, where the UvrA ATPase provides the DNA lesion-sensing function. The herein reported genetic analysis demonstrates that M. tuberculosis UvrA is important for the repair of nitrosative and oxidative DNA damage. Moreover, our biochemical and structural characterization of recombinant M. tuberculosis UvrA contributes new insights into its mechanism of action. In particular, the structural investigation reveals an unprecedented conformation of the UvrB-binding domain that we propose to be of functional relevance. Taken together, our data suggest UvrA as a potential target for the development of novel anti-tubercular agents and provide a biochemical framework for the identification of small-molecule inhibitors interfering with the NER activity in M. tuberculosis.

Involvement of a cryptic ATPase activity of UvrB and its proteolysis product, UvrB* in DNA repair

The incision of damaged DNA by the Escherichia coli UvrABC endonuclease requires ATP hydrolysis. Although the deduced sequence of the UvrB protein suggests a putative ATP binding site, no nucleoside triphosphatase activity is demonstrable with the purified UvrB protein. The UvrB protein is specifically proteolyzed in E. coli cell extracts to yield a 70 kD fragment, referred to as UvrB*, which has been purified and is shown to possess a single-strand DNA dependent ATPase activity. Substrate specificity and kinetic analyses of UvrB* catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis indicate that the stimulation in DNA dependent ATPase activity following formation of the UvrAB complex results from the activation of the normally sequestered UvrB associated ATPase. Using nucleotide analogues, it can be shown that this activity is essential to the DNA incision reaction carried out by the UvrABC complex.

Potential role of proteolysis in the control of UvrABC incision

UvrB is specifically proteolyzed in Escherichia coli cell extracts to UvrB*. UvrB* is capable of interacting with UvrA in an aparently similar manner to the UvrB, however UvrB* is defective in the DNA strand displacement activity normally displayed by UvrAB. Whereas the binding of UvrC to a UvrAB-DNA complex leads to DNA incision and persistence of a stable post-incision protein-DNA complex, the binding of UvrC to UvrAB* leads to dissociation of the protein complex and no DNA incision is seen. The factor which stimulates this proteolysis has been partially purified and its substrate specificity has been examined. The protease factor is induced by "stress" and is under control of the htpR gene. The potential role of this proteolysis in the regulation of levels of active repair enzymes in the cell is discussed.

Scanning the DNA for damage by the nucleotide excision repair machinery

Damage detection during nucleotide excision repair requires the action of multiple proteins that probe the DNA for different parameters like disruption of basepairing, DNA bendability and presence of chemical modifications. In a recent study it has been shown that two of these probing events can be spatially separated on the DNA. Upon initial binding of the XPC protein to a region with disrupted basepairing a complex of XPC, TFIIH and XPA is translocated to a CPD lesion even when this chemical modification is located up to 160 nucleotides from the mispaired region.

Single-molecule analysis reveals two separate DNA-binding domains in the Escherichia coli UvrA dimer

The UvrA protein is the initial damage-recognizing factor in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each monomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase sites. Using single-molecule analysis we show that dimerization of UvrA in the presence of ATP is significantly higher than with ADP or nonhydrolyzable ATPγS, suggesting that the active UvrA dimer contains a mixture of ADP and ATP. We also show that the UvrA dimer has a high preference of binding the end of a linear DNA fragment, independent on the presence or type of cofactor. Apparently ATP binding or hydrolysis is not needed to discriminate between DNA ends and internal sites. A significant number of complexes could be detected where one UvrA dimer bridges two DNA ends implying the presence of two separate DNA-binding domains, most likely present in each monomer. On DNA containing a site-specific lesion the damage-specific binding is much higher than DNA-end binding, but only in the absence of cofactor or with ATP. With ATPγS no discrimination between a DNA end and a DNA damage could be observed. We present a model where damage recognition of UvrA depends on the ability of both UvrA monomers to interact with the DNA flanking the lesion.

A molecular bar-coded DNA repair resource for pooled toxicogenomic screens

DNA damage from exogenous and endogenous sources can promote mutations and cell death. Fortunately, cells contain DNA repair and damage signaling pathways to reduce the mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of DNA damage. The identification of specific DNA repair proteins and the coordination of DNA repair pathways after damage has been a central theme to the field of genetic toxicology and we have developed a tool for use in this area. We have produced 99 molecular bar-coded Escherichia coli gene-deletion mutants specific to DNA repair and damage signaling pathways, and each bar-coded mutant can be tracked in pooled format using bar-code specific microarrays. Our design adapted bar-codes developed for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene-deletion project, which allowed us to utilize an available microarray product for pooled gene-exposure studies. Microarray-based screens were used for en masse identification of individual mutants sensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). As expected, gene-deletion mutants specific to direct, base excision, and recombinational DNA repair pathways were identified as MMS-sensitive in our pooled assay, thus validating our resource. We have demonstrated that molecular bar-codes designed for S. cerevisiae are transferable to E. coli, and that they can be used with pre-existing microarrays to perform competitive growth experiments. Further, when comparing microarray to traditional plate-based screens both overlapping and distinct results were obtained, which is a novel technical finding, with discrepancies between the two approaches explained by differences in output measurements (DNA content versus cell mass). The microarray-based classification of Deltatag and DeltadinG cells as depleted after MMS exposure, contrary to plate-based methods, led to the discovery that Deltatag and DeltadinG cells show a filamentation phenotype after MMS exposure, thus accounting for the discrepancy. A novel biological finding is the observation that while DeltadinG cells filament in response to MMS they exhibit wild-type sulA expression after exposure. This decoupling of filamentation from SulA levels suggests that DinG is associated with the SulA-independent filamentation pathway.

'Close-fitting sleeves': DNA damage recognition by the UvrABC nuclease system

DNA damage recognition represents a long-standing problem in the field of protein-DNA interactions. This article reviews our current knowledge of how damage recognition is achieved in bacterial nucleotide excision repair through the concerted action of the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins.

Haemophilus influenzae UvrA: overexpression, purification, and in cell complementation

UvrA protein is a major component of ABC endonuclease complex involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER) mechanism. Although NER system is best characterized in Escherichia coli, not much information is available in Haemophilus influenzae. However, based on amino acid homology, uvrA ORF has been identified on H. influenzae genome [gene identification No. HI0249, Science 269 (1995) 496]. H. influenzae Rd uvrA ORF was cloned and overexpressed in E. coli. The expressed UvrA protein was purified using a two-step column chromatography protocol to a single band of expected molecular weight (104 kDa) and characterized for its ATPase and DNA binding activity. In addition, when H. influenzae uvrA was introduced in E. coli uvrA mutant strain AB1886, its UV resistance was restored to near wild type level.

Molecular mechanisms of TRS instability

To date several neurodegenerative disorders including myotonic dystrophy, Huntington's disease, Kennedy's disease, fragile X syndrome, spinocerebellar ataxias or Friedreich's ataxia have been linked to the expanding trinucleotide sequences. Although phenotypic features vary among these debilitating diseases, the structural abnormalities of the triplet repeat containing DNA sequences is the primary cause for all of these disorders. Expansions of the CAG repeat within coding regions of miscellaneous genes result in the synthesis of aberrant proteins containing enormously long polyglutamine stretches. Such proteins acquire toxic functions and/or may direct cells into the apoptotic cycle. On the other hand, massive expansions of various triplet repeats (i.e., CTG/CAG, CGG/CCG/, GAA/TTC) inside the noncoding regions lead to the silencing of transcription and therefore affect expression of the adjacent genes. The repetitive character of TRS allows stretches of such tracts to form slipped-stranded structures, self-complementary hairpins, triplexes or more complex configurations called "sticky DNA", which are not equally processed by some cellular mechanisms, as compared to random DNA. It is likely that the instability of the short TRS (below the threshold level) occurs due to the SILC pathway, which is driven by the DNA slippage. Accumulation of the short expansions leads to the disease premutation state where the MLC pathway becomes predominant. Independent of which mechanism is involved in the MLC pathway (replication, transcription, repair or recombination) the process of complementary strand synthesis is crucial for the TRS instability. Generally, dependent on the location of the tract which has higher potential to form secondary DNA structure, further processing of such tract may result in expansions (secondary structure formed at the newly synthesized strand) or deletions (structure present on the template strand). Analyses of molecular mechanisms of the TRS genetic instability using bacteria, yeast, cell lines and transgenic animals as models allowed the scientists to better understand the role of some major cellular processes in the development of neurodegenerative disorders in humans. However, it is necessary to remember that most of these investigations were focused on the involvement of each particular process separately. Much less of this work though was dedicated to the search for the interactions between such cellular systems that in effect could result in different rate of TRS expansions. Thus, more intensive studies are necessary in order to fully understand the phenomenon ofthe dynamic mutations leading to the human hereditary neurodegenerative diseases.

Clue to damage recognition by UvrB: residues in the beta-hairpin structure prevent binding to non-damaged DNA

UvrB, the ultimate damage-recognizing component of bacterial nucleotide excision repair, contains a flexible beta-hairpin rich in hydrophobic residues. We describe the properties of UvrB mutants in which these residues have been mutated. The results show that Y101 and F108 in the tip of the hairpin are important for the strand-separating activity of UvrB, supporting the model that the beta-hairpin inserts between the two DNA strands during the search for DNA damage. Residues Y95 and Y96 at the base of the hairpin have a direct role in damage recognition and are positioned close to the damage in the UvrB-DNA complex. Strikingly, substituting Y92 and Y93 results in a protein that is lethal to the cell. The mutant protein forms pre- incision complexes on non-damaged DNA, indicating that Y92 and Y93 function in damage recognition by preventing UvrB binding to non-damaged sites. We propose a model for damage recognition by UvrB in which, stabilized by the four tyrosines at the base of the hairpin, the damaged nucleotide is flipped out of the DNA helix.

Role of ATP hydrolysis by UvrA and UvrB during nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair in eubacteria is a process that repairs DNA damages by the removal of a 12-13-mer oligonucleotide containing the lesion. Recognition and cleavage of the damaged DNA is a multistep ATP-dependent reaction that requires the UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins. Both UvrA and UvrB are ATPases, with UvrA having two ATP binding sites which have the characteristic signature of the family of ABC proteins and UvrB having one ATP binding site that is structurally related to that of helicases.

UvrA and UvrB suppress illegitimate recombination: synergistic action with RecQ helicase

Illegitimate recombination is a major cause of genetic instability in prokaryotes as well as in eukaryotes. This recombination usually occurs at a low frequency, but it is greatly enhanced by UV irradiation or other environmental stresses. DNA damages produced by these environmental stresses are thought to induce DNA double-strand breaks, leading to illegitimate recombination. In this paper we show that UV-induced illegitimate recombination is enhanced by mutations of nucleotide excision repair genes, uvrA or uvrB, and partially by uvrC mutation, but not by uvrD mutation. Unexpectedly, the recombination was enhanced by the uvrA uvrB double mutation even without UV irradiation, but the uvrB uvrC double mutation has not shown this effect, suggesting that illegitimate recombination is mostly suppressed by UvrA and UvrB. Moreover, illegitimate recombination was synergistically enhanced by the recQ uvrA double mutation. In addition, overproduction of the UvrA protein suppressed the hyperrecombination phenotype of the recQ or uvrB mutant, but it did not affect the UV-sensitive phenotype of the uvrB mutant. We concluded that the UvrAB complex suppresses illegitimate recombination in a pathway shared with RecQ helicase. In addition, UvrA protein alone can suppress illegitimate recombination in the pathway, in which RecQ helicase and UvrAB complex work. Possible functions of the proteins involved in these pathways are also discussed.

Interaction of UvrA and UvrB proteins with a fluorescent single-stranded DNA. Implication for slow conformational change upon interaction of UvrB with DNA

UvrA and UvrB proteins play key roles in the damage recognition step in the nucleotide excision repair. However, the molecular mechanism of damage recognition by these proteins is still not well understood. In this work we analyzed the interaction between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) labeled with a fluorophore tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) and Thermus thermophilus HB8 UvrA (ttUvrA) and UvrB (ttUvrB) proteins. TMR-labeled ssDNA (TMR-ssDNA) as well as UV-irradiated ssDNA stimulated ATPase activity of ttUvrB more strongly than did normal ssDNA, indicating that this fluorescent ssDNA was recognized as damaged ssDNA. The addition of ttUvrA or ttUvrB enhanced the fluorescence intensity of TMR-ssDNA, and the intensity was much greater in the presence of ATP. Fluorescence titration indicated that ttUvrA has higher specificity for TMR-ssDNA than for normal ssDNA in the absence of ATP. The ttUvrB showed no specificity for TMR-ssDNA, but it took over 200 min for the fluorescence intensity of the ttUvrB-TMR-ssDNA complex to reach saturation in the presence of ATP. This time-dependent change could be separated into two phases. The first phase was rapid, whereas the second phase was slow and dependent on ATP hydrolysis. Time dependence of ATPase activity and fluorescence polarization suggested that changes other than the binding reaction occurred during the second phase. These results strongly suggest that ttUvrB binds ssDNA quickly and that a conformational change in ttUrvB-ssDNA complex occurs slowly. We also found that DNA containing a fluorophore as a lesion is useful for directly investigating the damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB.

Nucleotide excision repair affects the stability of long transcribed (CTG*CAG) tracts in an orientation-dependent manner in Escherichia coli

The influence of nucleotide excision repair (NER), the principal in vivo repair system for DNA damages, was investigated in Escherichia coli with uvrA, uvrB and uvrAuvrB mutants with the triplet repeat sequences (TRS) involved in myotonic dystrophy, the fragile X syndrome and Friedreich's ataxia. (CTG*CAG)175was more stable when the (CTG) strand was transcribed than when the (CAG) strand was transcribed in the alternate orientation. A lack of the UvrA protein dramatically increases the instability of this TRS in vivo as compared with the stability of the same sequence in uvrB mutant, which produces an intact UvrA protein. We propose that transcription transiently dissociates the triplet repeat complementary strands enabling the non-transcribed strand to fold into a hairpin conformation which is then sufficiently stable that replication bypasses the hairpin to give large deletions. If the TRS was not transcribed, fewer deletions were observed. Alternatively, in the uvrA-mutant, the hairpins existing on the lagging strand will suffer bypass DNA synthesis to generate deleted molecules. Hence, NER, functionally similar in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, is an important factor in the genetic instabilities of long transcribed TRS implicated in human hereditary neuro-logical diseases.

The DrrC protein of Streptomyces peucetius, a UvrA-like protein, is a DNA-binding protein whose gene is induced by daunorubicin

DrrC, a daunorubicin resistance protein with a strong sequence similarity to the UvrA protein involved in excision repair of DNA, is induced by daunorubicin in Streptomyces peucetius and behaves like an ATP-dependent, DNA binding protein in vitro. The refolded protein obtained from expression of the drrC gene in Escherichia coli was used to conduct gel retardation assays. DrrC bound a DNA segment containing the promoter region of a daunorubicin production gene only in the presence of ATP and daunorubicin. This result suggests that DrrC is a novel type of drug self-resistance protein with DNA binding properties like those of UvrA. Western blotting analysis with a polyclonal antiserum generated against His-tagged DrrC showed that the appearance of DrrC in S. peucetius is coincident with the onset of daunorubicin production and that the drrC gene is induced by daunorubicin. These data also showed that the DnrN and DnrI regulatory proteins are required for drrC expression. The level of DrrA, another daunorubicin resistance protein that resembles ATP-dependent bacterial antiporters, was regulated in the same way as that of DrrC.

The limited strand-separating activity of the UvrAB protein complex and its role in the recognition of DNA damage

The recognition by Escherichia coli Uvr nucleotide excision repair proteins of a variety of lesions with diverse chemical structures and the presence of helicase activity in the UvrAB complex which can displace short oligonucleotides annealed to single-stranded DNA led to a model in which this activity moves UvrAB along undamaged DNA to damaged sites where the lesion blocks further translocation and the protein-DNA pre-incision complex is formed. To evaluate this mechanism for damage recognition, we constructed substrates with oligonucleotides of different lengths annealed to single-stranded DNA circles and placed a single 2-(acetylamino)fluorene (AAF) lesion either on the oligonucleotide or on the circle. For the substrates with no lesion, the UvrAB complex effectively displaced a 22-mer but not a 27-mer or longer fragments. The presence of AAF on the oligonucleotide significantly increased the release of the 27-mer but oligomers of 30 or longer were not separated. Placing the lesion on the circular strand did not block the release of the fragments. Instead, the releasing activity of UvrAB was stimulated and also depended on the length of the annealed oligonucleotide. These observations do not agree with the predictions of a damage recognition mechanism that depends on helicase-driven translocation. Most likely, the strand-separating activity of UvrAB is a consequence of local changes occurring during the formation of a DNA-protein pre-incision complex at the damaged site and is not due to translocation of the protein along undamaged DNA to locate a lesion.

Reconstitution of human excision nuclease with recombinant XPF-ERCC1 complex

The human XPF-ERCC1 protein complex is one of several factors known to be required for general nucleotide excision repair. Genetic data indicate that both proteins of this complex are necessary for the repair of interstrand cross-links, perhaps via recombination. To determine whether XPF-ERCC1 completes a set of six proteins that are sufficient to carry out excision repair, the human XPF and ERCC1 cDNAs were coexpressed in Sf21 insect cells from a baculovirus vector. The purified complex contained the anticipated 5' junction-specific endonuclease activity that is stimulated through a direct interaction between XPF and replication protein A (RPA). The recombinant complex also complemented extracts of XP-F cells and Chinese hamster ovary mutants assigned to complementation groups 1, 4, and 11. Furthermore, reconstitution of the human excision nuclease was observed with a mixture of five repair factors (XPA, XPC, XPG, TFIIH, and RPA) and the recombinant XPF-ERCC1, thus verifying that no additional protein factors are needed for the specific dual incisions characteristic of human excision repair.

Transcriptional activity of transcription factor IIE is dependent on zinc binding

The functions of individual basal transcription factors during the formation of an initiation complex by RNA polymerase II remain largely unknown. Transcription factor IIE (TFIIE) has recently been shown to bind to multiple targets in the initiation complex. To assess the role of zinc binding in basal transcription, we have mutated the predicted zinc-finger domain of human TFIIE. Atomic absorption spectroscopy using purified recombinant proteins revealed that the large subunit, TFIIE-56, is indeed a zinc-binding protein. Mutation of a cysteine residue in the putative zinc-finger domain abolished zinc binding. Moreover, mutant TFIIE-56 failed to support reconstituted basal transcription in vitro, suggesting that zinc binding is required for TFIIE function. However, gel-filtration experiments and protein affinity experiments suggest that mutant TFIIE-56 forms a stable heterotetramer with the small subunit, TFIIE-34, that is similar to wild type. Interestingly, gel mobility shift experiments reveal that loss of transcriptional activity by mutant TFIIE is correlated with its inability to stably assemble into the transcription complex. These findings establish that zinc binding by TFIIE may help form a specific structure that is required for stable entry into the transcription complex.

Yeast DNA-repair gene RAD14 encodes a zinc metalloprotein with affinity for ultraviolet-damaged DNA

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) patients suffer from a high incidence of skin cancers due to a defect in excision repair of UV light-damaged DNA. Of the seven XP complementation groups, A-G, group A represents a severe and frequent form of the disease. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD14 gene is a homolog of the XP-A correcting (XPAC) gene. Like XP-A cells, rad14-null mutants are defective in the incision step of excision repair of UV-damaged DNA. We have purified RAD14 protein to homogeneity from extract of a yeast strain genetically tailored to overexpress RAD14. As determined by atomic emission spectroscopy, RAD14 contains one zinc atom. We also show in vitro that RAD14 binds zinc but does not bind other divalent metal ions. In DNA mobility-shift assays, RAD14 binds specifically to UV-damaged DNA. Removal of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers from damaged DNA by enzymatic photoreactivation has no effect on binding, strongly suggesting that RAD14 recognizes pyrimidine(6-4)pyrimidone photoproduct sites. These findings indicate that RAD14 functions in damage recognition during excision repair.

Nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair is the major DNA repair mechanism in all species tested. This repair system is the sole mechanism for removing bulky adducts from DNA, but it repairs essentially all DNA lesions, and thus, in addition to its main function, it plays a back-up role for other repair systems. In both pro- and eukaryotes nucleotide excision is accomplished by a multisubunit ATP-dependent nuclease. The excision nuclease of prokaryotes incises the eighth phosphodiester bond 5' and the fourth or fifth phosphodiester bond 3' to the modified nucleotide and thus excises a 12-13-mer. The excision nuclease of eukaryotes incises the 22nd, 23rd, or 24th phosphodiester bond 5' and the fifth phosphodiester bond 3' to the lesion and thus removes the adduct in a 27-29-mer. A transcription repair coupling factor encoded by the mfd gene in Escherichia coli and the ERCC6 gene in humans directs the excision nuclease to RNA polymerase stalled at a lesion in the transcribed strand and thus ensures preferential repair of this strand compared to the nontranscribed strand.

Structure of UvrABC excinuclease-UV-damaged DNA complexes studied by flow linear dichroism. DNA curved by UvrB and UvrC

The interaction between UvrABC excinuclease from Escherichia coli and ultraviolet light-(UV) damaged DNA was studied by flow linear dichroism. The dichroism signal from DNA was drastically decreased in intensity upon incubation with UvrA and UvrB or whole enzyme in the presence of effector ATP. The change was specific for UV-damaged DNA, and a concluded suppressed DNA orientation suggests the wrapping of DNA around the protein. The incubation with the UvrC subunit alone also somewhat reduces the signal, however, in this case the change was smaller and not specific for UV-damaged DNA. The structural modification of DNA, promoted by the (UvrA2-UvrB) complex, probably facilitates or stabilizes the interaction of the UvrC subunit with DNA for the excision.

(A)BC excinuclease: the Escherichia coli nucleotide excision repair enzyme

Nucleotide excision repair is the major pathway for removing damage from DNA. (A)BC excinuclease is the nuclease activity which initiates nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. In this review, we focus on current understanding of the structure-function of the enzyme and the reaction mechanism of the repair pathway. In addition, recent biochemical studies on preferential repair of actively transcribed genes in E. coli are summarized.

Complementation of DNA repair in xeroderma pigmentosum group A cell extracts by a protein with affinity for damaged DNA

Complementation group A of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) represents one of the most prevalent and serious forms of this cancer-prone disorder. Because of a marked defect in DNA excision repair, cells from individuals with XP-A are hypersensitive to the toxic and mutagenic effects of ultraviolet light and many chemical agents. We report here the isolation of the XP-A DNA repair protein by complementation of cell extracts from a repair-defective human XP-A cell line. XP-A protein purified from calf thymus migrates on denaturing gel electrophoresis as a doublet of 40 and 42 kilodaltons. The XP-A protein binds preferentially to ultraviolet light-irradiated DNA, with a preference for damaged over nondamaged nucleotides of approximately 10(3). This strongly suggests that the XP-A protein plays a direct role in the recognition of and incision at lesions in DNA. We further show that this protein corresponds to the product encoded by a recently isolated gene that can restore excision repair to XP-A cells. Thus, excision repair of plasmid DNA by cell extracts sufficiently resembles genomic repair in cells to reveal accurately the repair defect in an inherited disease. The general approach described here can be extended to the identification and isolation of other human DNA repair proteins.

Isolation and characterization of functional domains of UvrA

The sequence of Escherichia coli UvrA protein suggests that it may fold into two functional domains each possessing DNA binding and ATPase activities. We have taken two approaches to physically isolate polypeptides corresponding to the two putative domains. First, a 180 base pair DNA segment encoding multiple collagenase recognition sequences was inserted into UvrA's putative interdomain hinge region. This UvrA derivative was purified and digested with collagenase, and the resulting 70-kDa N-terminal and 35-kDa C-terminal fragments were purified. Both fragments possessed nonspecific DNA binding activity, but only the N-terminal domain retained its nucleotide binding capacity as evidence by measurements of ATP hydrolysis and by ATP photo-cross-linking. Together, the two fragments failed to substitute for UvrA in reconstituting (A)BC excinuclease and, therefore, were presumed to be unable to load UvrB onto damaged DNA. Second, the DNA segments encoding the two domains were fused to the beta-galactosidase gene. The UvrA N-terminal domain-beta-galactosidase fusion protein was overproduced and purified. This fusion protein had ATPase activity, thus confirming that the amino-terminal domain does possess an intrinsic ATPase activity independent of any interaction with the carboxy terminus. Our results show that UvrA has two functional domains and that the specificity for binding to damaged DNA is provided by the proper three-dimensional orientation of one zinc finger motif relative to the other and is not an intrinsic property of an individual zinc finger domain.

Site-specific mutagenesis of conserved residues within Walker A and B sequences of Escherichia coli UvrA protein

UvrA is the ATPase subunit of the DNA repair enzyme (A)BC excinuclease. The amino acid sequence of this protein has revealed, in addition to two zinc fingers, three pairs of nucleotide binding motifs each consisting of a Walker A and B sequence. We have conducted site-specific mutagenesis, ATPase kinetic analyses, and nucleotide binding equilibrium measurements to correlate these sequence motifs with activity. Replacement of the invariant Lys by Ala in the putative A sequences indicated that K37 and K646 but not K353 are involved in ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, substitution of the invariant Asp by Asn in the B sequences at positions D238, D513, or D857 had little effect on the in vivo activity of the protein. Nucleotide binding studies revealed a stoichiometry of 0.5 ADP/UvrA monomer while kinetic measurements on wild-type and mutant proteins showed that the active form of UvrA is a dimer with 2 catalytic sites which interact in a positive cooperative manner in the presence of ADP; mutagenesis of K37 but not of K646 attenuated this cooperativity. Loss of ATPase activity was about 75% in the K37A, 86% in the K646A mutant, and 95% in the K37A-K646A double mutant. These amino acid substitutions had only a marginal effect on the specific binding of UvrA to damaged DNA but drastically reduced its ability to deliver UvrB to the damage site. We find that the deficient UvrB loading activity of these mutant UvrA proteins results from their inability to associate with UvrB in the form of (UvrA)2(UvrB)1 complexes. We conclude that UvrA forms a dimer with two ATPase domains involving K37 and K646 and that the work performed by ATP hydrolysis is the delivery of UvrB to the damage site on DNA.

Noncovalent drug-DNA binding interactions that inhibit and stimulate (A)BC excinuclease

(A)BC excinuclease from Escherichia coli catalyzes the initial step of nucleotide excision repair. It recognizes and binds to many types of covalent modifications in DNA and incises the damaged strand on both sides of the lesion. We employed a variety of noncovalent DNA binding drugs to examine in vitro the mechanisms and the nature of the DNA-drug interactions responsible for two phenomena: inhibition of excision repair by caffeine and other noncovalent DNA binding compounds; incision of undamaged DNA produced by (A)BC excinuclease in the presence of the bisintercalating drug ditercalinium. All of the chemicals examined (e.g., actinomycin D, caffeine, ethidium bromide, and Hoechst 33258) inhibited incision of a covalent adduct by (A)BC excinuclease, and direct evidence is given for a common mechanism in which UvrA is depleted by binding to drug-undamaged DNA complexes. In the absence of significant amounts of undamaged DNA, another mechanism of inhibition was observed, in which enzyme bound to noncovalent drug-DNA complexes in the vicinity of the lesion prevents formation of preincision complexes at the lesion. Ditercalinium and unexpectedly all of the other drugs examined promoted the incision of undamaged DNA when the enzyme was present at high concentration. Thus, this activity contrary to previous assumptions is not unique to bisintercalators. Another unexpected finding was stimulation of incision at certain sites of photodamage in DNA produced by low concentrations of noncovalent DNA binding chemicals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

ATP-dependent partitioning of the DNA template into supercoiled domains by Escherichia coli UvrAB

The helicase action of the Escherichia coli UvrAB complex on a covalently closed circular DNA template was monitored using bacterial DNA topoisomerase I, which specifically removes negative supercoils. In the presence of E. coli DNA topoisomerase I and ATP, the UvrAB complex gradually introduced positive supercoils into the input relaxed plasmid DNA template. Positive supercoils were not produced when E. coli DNA topoisomerase I was replaced by eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I or when both E. coli and eukaryotic DNA topoisomerases I were added simultaneously. These results suggest that like other DNA helix-tracking processes, the ATP-dependent action of the UvrAB complex on duplex DNA simultaneously generates both positive and negative supercoils, which are not constrained by protein binding but are torsionally strained. The supercoiling activity of UvrAB on UV-damaged DNA was also studied using UV-damaged plasmid DNA and a mutant UvrA protein that lacks the 40 C-terminal amino acids and is defective in preferential binding to UV-damaged DNA. UvrAB was found to preferentially supercoil the UV-damaged DNA template, whereas the mutant protein supercoiled UV-damaged and undamaged DNA with equal efficiency. Our results therefore suggest that the DNA helix-tracking activity of UvrAB may be involved in searching and/or prepriming the damaged DNA for UvrC incision. A possible role of supercoiled domains in the incision process is discussed.