Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: second-site mutation Asn-M44-->Asp restores electron and proton transfer in reaction centers from the photosynthetically deficient Asp-L213-->Asn mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The role of an intramolecular hydrogen bond in the redox properties of carboxylic acid naphthoquinones

A bioinspired naphthoquinone model of the quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers but bearing an intramolecular hydrogen-bonded carboxylic acid has been synthesized and characterized electrochemically, spectroscopically, and computationally to provide mechanistic insight into the role of proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) of quinone reduction in photosynthesis. The reduction potential of this construct is 370 mV more positive than the unsubstituted naphthoquinone. In addition to the reversible cyclic voltammetry, infrared spectroelectrochemistry confirms that the naphthoquinone/naphthoquinone radical anion couple is fully reversible. Calculated redox potentials agree with the experimental trends arising from the intramolecular hydrogen bond. Molecular electrostatic potentials illustrate the reversible proton transfer driving forces, and analysis of the computed vibrational spectra supports the possibility of a combination of electron transfer and PCET processes. The significance of PCET, reversibility, and redox potential management relevant to the design of artificial photosynthetic assemblies involving PCET processes is discussed.

Mechanism of Asparagine-Mediated Proton Transfer in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers

In photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs), light-induced charge separation leads to the reduction of the terminal electron acceptor quinone, QB. The reduction of QB to QB•- is followed by protonation via Asp-L213 and Ser-L223 in PbRC from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. However, Asp-L213 is replaced with nontitratable Asn-L222 and Asn-L213 in PbRCs from Thermochromatium tepidum and Blastochloris viridis, respectively. Here, we investigated the energetics of proton transfer along the asparagine-involved H-bond network using a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approach. The potential energy profile for the H-bond between H3O+ and the carbonyl O site of Asn-L222 shows that the proton is predominantly localized at the Asn-L222 moiety in the T. tepidum PbRC protein environment, easily forming the enol species. The release of the proton from the amide -NH2 site toward Ser-L232 via tautomerization suffers from the energy barrier. Upon reorientation of Asn-L222, the enol -OH site forms a short low-barrier H-bond with Ser-L232, facilitating protonation of QB•- in a Grotthuss-like mechanism. This is a basis of how asparagine or glutamine side chains function as acceptors/donors in proton transfer pathways.

Comparison of proton transfer paths to the QA and QB sites of the Rb. sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

The photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers from purple non-sulfur bacteria use light energy to drive the transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to ubiquinone. Ubiquinone bound in the Q_A site cycles between quinone, Q_A, and anionic semiquinone, Q_A^·-, being reduced once and never binding protons. In the Q_B site, ubiquinone is reduced twice by Q_A^·-, binds two protons and is released into the membrane as the quinol, QH₂. The network of hydrogen bonds formed in a molecular dynamics trajectory was drawn to investigate proton transfer pathways from the cytoplasm to each quinone binding site. Q_A is isolated with no path for protons to enter from the surface. In contrast, there is a complex and tangled network requiring residues and waters that can bring protons to Q_B. There are three entries from clusters of surface residues centered around HisH126, GluH224, and HisH68. The network is in good agreement with earlier studies, Mutation of key nodes in the network, such as SerL223, were previously shown to slow proton delivery. Mutational studies had also shown that double mutations of residues such as AspM17 and AspL210 along multiple paths in the network presented here slow the reaction, while single mutations do not. Likewise, mutation of both HisH126 and HisH128, which are at the entry to two paths reduce the rate of proton uptake.

Double reduction of plastoquinone to plastoquinol in photosystem 1

In Photosystem 1 (PS1), phylloquinone (PhQ) acts as a secondary electron acceptor from chlorophyll ec(3) and also as an electron donor to the iron-sulfur cluster F(X). PS1 possesses two virtually equivalent branches of electron transfer (ET) cofactors from P(700) to F(X), and the lifetime of the semiquinone intermediate displays biphasic kinetics, reflecting ET along the two different branches. PhQ in PS1 serves only as an intermediate in ET and is not normally fully reduced to the quinol form. This is in contrast to PS2, in which plastoquinone (PQ) is doubly reduced to plastoquinol (PQH(2)) as the terminal electron acceptor. We purified PS1 particles from the menD1 mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii that cannot synthesize PhQ, resulting in replacement of PhQ by PQ in the quinone-binding pocket. The magnitude of the stable flash-induced P(700)(+) signal of menD1 PS1, but not wild-type PS1, decreased during a train of laser flashes, as it was replaced by a ~30 ns back-reaction from the preceding radical pair (P(700)(+)A(0)(-)). We show that this process of photoinactivation is due to double reduction of PQ in the menD1 PS1 and have characterized the process. It is accelerated at lower pH, consistent with a rate-limiting protonation step. Moreover, a point mutation (PsaA-L722T) in the PhQ(A) site that accelerates ET to F(X) ~2-fold, likely by weakening the sole H-bond to PhQ(A), also accelerates the photoinactivation process. The addition of exogenous PhQ can restore activity to photoinactivated PS1 and confer resistance to further photoinactivation. This process also occurs with PS1 purified from the menB PhQ biosynthesis mutant of Synechocystis PCC 6803, demonstrating that it is a general phenomenon in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic PS1.

Proton-transfer pathways in photosynthetic reaction centers analyzed by profile hidden markov models and network calculations

In the bacterial reaction center (bRC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the key residues of proton transfer to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) are known. Also, several possible proton entry points and proton-transfer pathways have been proposed. However, the mechanism of the proton transfer to Q(B) remains unclear. The proton transfer to Q(B) in the bRC of Blastochloris viridis is less explored. To analyze whether the bRCs of different species use the same key residues for proton transfer to Q(B), we determined the conservation of these residues. We performed a multiple-sequence alignment based on profile hidden Markov models. Residues involved in proton transfer but not located at the protein surface are conserved or are only exchanged to functionally similar amino acids, whereas potential proton entry points are not conserved to the same extent. The analysis of the hydrogen-bond network of the bRC from R. sphaeroides and that from B. viridis showed that a large network connects Q(B) with the cytoplasmic region in both bRCs. For both species, all non-surface key residues are part of the network. However, not all proton entry points proposed for the bRC of R. sphaeroides are included in the network in the bRC of B. viridis. From our analysis, we could identify possible proton entry points. These proton entry points differ between the two bRCs. Together, the results of the conservation analysis and the hydrogen-bond network analysis make it likely that the proton transfer to Q(B) is not mediated by distinct pathways but by a large hydrogen-bond network.

Chance and design—Proton transfer in water, channels and bioenergetic proteins

Proton transfer and transport in water, gramicidin and some selected channels and bioenergetic proteins are reviewed. An attempt is made to draw some conclusions about how Nature designs long distance, proton transport functionality. The prevalence of water rather than amino acid hydrogen bonded chains is noted, and the possible benefits of waters as the major component are discussed qualitatively.

Ubiquinone (coenzyme Q10) binding sites: Low dielectric constant of the gate prevents the escape of the semiquinone

The photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from purple bacteria is frequently used as a model for the interaction of ubiquinones (coenzyme Q) with membrane proteins. Single-turnover flash activation of RC leads to formation of the semiquinone (SQ) of the secondary acceptor quinone after odd flashes and quinol after even flashes. The ubiquinol escapes the binding site in 1 ms, while the SQ does not leave the binding site for at least 5 min. Observed difference between these times suggests a large energetic barrier for the SQ. However, high apparent dielectric constant in the vicinity of the quinone ring (>or=25) results in a relatively small electrostatic energy of SQ stabilization. To resolve this apparent contradiction I suggest that a significant part of the kinetic stabilization of the SQ is achieved by the special topology of the binding site in which quinone can exit the binding site only by moving its headgroup toward the center of the membrane. The large energetic penalty of transferring the charged headgroup to the membrane dielectric can explain the observed kinetic stability of the SQ.

Small weak acids reactivate proton transfer in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides mutated at AspL210 and AspM17

In reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, site-directed mutagenesis has implicated several acidic residues in the delivery of protons to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) during reduction to quinol. In a double mutant (Asp(L210) --> Asn + Asp(M17) --> Asn) that is severely impaired in proton transfer capability over a wide pH range, proton transfer was "rescued" by added weak acids. For low pK(a) acids the total concentration of salt required near neutral pH was high. The ionic strength effect of added salts stimulated the rate of proton-coupled electron transfer at pH < 7, but decreased it at pH > 7.5, indicating an effective isoelectric point between these limits. In this region, a substantial rate enhancement by weak acids was clearly evident. A Brønsted plot of activity versus pK(a) of the rescuing acids was linear, with a slope of -1, and extrapolated to a diffusion-limited rate at pK(a)(app) approximately 1. However, the maximum rate at saturating concentrations of acid did not correlate with pK(a), indicating that the acid and anion species compete for binding, both with weak affinity. This model predicts that pK(a)(app) corresponds to a true pK(a) = 4-5, similar to that for a carboxylic acid or Q(B)(-), itself. Only rather small, neutral acids were active, indicating a need to access a small internal volume, suggested to be a proton channel to the Q(B) domain. However, the on-rates were near the diffusion limit. The implications for intraprotein proton transfer pathway design are discussed.

Energetics of Proton Transfer Pathways in Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Electron transfer between the primary and secondary quinones (Q(A), Q(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) is coupled with proton uptake at Q(B). The protons are conducted from the cytoplasmic side, probably with the participation of two water channels. Mutations of titratable residues like Asp-L213 to Asn (inhibited mutant) or the double mutant Glu-L212 to Ala/Asp-L213 to Ala inhibit these electron transfer-coupled proton uptake events. The inhibition of the proton transfer (PT) process in the single mutant can be restored by a second mutation of Arg-M233 to Cys or Arg-H177 to His (revertant mutant). These revertant mutants shed light on the location of the main proton transfer pathway of wild type bRC. In contrast to the wild type and inhibited mutant bRC, the revertant mutant bRC showed notable proton uptake at Glu-H173 upon formation of the Q(B)- state. In all of these mutants, the pK(a) of Asp-M17 decreased by 1.4-2.4 units with respect to the wild type bRC, whereas a significant pK(a) upshift of up to 5.8 units was observed at Glu-H122, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, and Glu-H230 in the revertant mutants. These residues belonging to the main PT pathway are arranged along water channel P1 localized mainly in subunit H. bRC possesses subunit H, which has no counterpart in photosystem II. Thus, bRC may possess alternative PT pathways involving water channels in subunit H, which becomes active in case the main PT pathway is blocked.

Cytochrome c oxidase: 25 years of the elusive proton pump

Since its discovery [Nature 266 (1977) 271], the function of cytochrome c oxidase (and other haem-copper oxidases) as a redox-driven proton pump has been subject of both intense research and controversy, and is one of the key unsolved issues of bioenergetics and of biochemistry more generally. Despite the fact that the mechanism of proton translocation is not yet fully understood on the molecular level, many important details and principles have been learned. In the hope of accelerating progress, some of these will be reviewed here, together with a brief presentation of a novel proton pump mechanism, and of the emergence of a molecular basis for control of its efficiency.

X-Ray Structure Determination of Three Mutants of the Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers from Rb. sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the reduction of a bound quinone molecule Q(B) is coupled with proton uptake. When Asp-L213 is replaced by Asn, proton transfer is inhibited. Proton transfer was restored by two second-site revertant mutations, Arg-M233-->Cys and Arg-H177-->His. Kinetic effects of Cd(2+) on proton transfer showed that the entry point in revertant RCs to be the same as in the native RC. The structures of the parental and two revertant RCs were determined at resolutions of 2.10, 1.80, and 2.75 A. From the structures, we were able to delineate alternate proton transfer pathways in the revertants. The main changes occur near Glu-H173, which allow it to substitute for the missing Asp-L213. The electrostatic changes near Glu-H173 cause it to be a good proton donor and acceptor, and the structural changes create a cavity which accommodates water molecules that connect Glu-H173 to other proton transfer components.

Proton transfer pathways and mechanism in bacterial reaction centers

The focus of this minireview is to discuss the state of knowledge of the pathways and rates of proton transfer in the bacterial reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Protons involved in the light driven catalytic reduction of a quinone molecule QB to quinol QBH2 travel from the aqueous solution through well defined proton transfer pathways to the oxygen atoms of the quinone. Three main topics are discussed: (1) the pathways for proton transfer involving the residues: His-H126, His-H128, Asp-L210, Asp-M17, Asp-L213, Ser-L223 and Glu-L212, which were determined by a variety of methods including the use of proton uptake inhibiting metal ions (e.g. Zn2+ and Cd2+); (2) the rate constants for proton transfer, obtained from a 'chemical rescue' study was determined to be 2 x 10(5) s(-1) and 2 x 10(4) s(-1) for the proton uptake to Glu-L212 and QB-*, respectively; (3) structural studies of altered proton transfer pathways in revertant RCs that lack the key amino acid Asp-L213 show a series of structural changes that propagate toward L213 potentially allowing Glu-H173 to participate in the proton transfer processes.

Acquisition of photosynthetic capacity by a reaction centre that lacks the QA ubiquinone; possible insights into the evolution of reaction centres?

A photosynthetically impaired strain of Rhodobacter sphaeroides containing reaction centres with an alanine to tryptophan mutation at residue 260 of the M-polypeptide (AM260W) was incubated under photosynthetic growth conditions. This incubation produced photosynthetically competent strains containing suppressor mutations that changed residue M260 to glycine or cysteine. Spectroscopic analysis demonstrated that the loss of the Q(A) ubiquinone seen in the original AM260W mutant was reversed in the suppressor mutants. In the mutant where Trp M260 was replaced by Cys, the rate of reduction of the Q(A) ubiquinone by the adjacent (H(A)) bacteriopheophytin was reduced by three-fold. The findings of the experiment are discussed in light of the X-ray crystal structures of the wild-type and AM260W reaction centres, and the possible implications for the evolution of reaction centres as bioenergetic complexes are considered.

The DMPC lipid phase transition influences differently the first and the second electron transfer reactions in bacterial reaction centers

Photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were incorporated in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) liposomes. The first and second electron transfer rates (k(AB)(1) and k(AB)(2), respectively) between the first and the second quinone electron acceptors have been measured as a function of temperature, across the phase transition of DMPC (23 degrees C). The Eyring plots of k(AB)(1) display straight lines. In contrast, the Eyring plots for k(AB)(2) in proteoliposomes show a break at about 23.5 degrees C. This physical discrimination between the two electron transfer reactions demonstrates that the stiffness of the lipid environment of the RCs and/or the protein-protein interactions influence the parameters governing k(AB)(2), but not the gating process limiting k(AB)(1).

The two-electron gate in photosynthetic bacteria

This paper gives a historical and personal account of the author's work in Rod Clayton's laboratory, when he observed the first evidence of the two-electron gate in bacterial reaction center. Colin Wraight had independently discovered this phenomenon at the same time. The high similarity between the acceptor side of Photosystem II (PS II) and of bacterial reaction centers was one of the first proofs for a profound homology between these two photosystems.

Reduction and protonation of the secondary quinone acceptor of Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction center: kinetic model based on a comparison of wild-type chromatophores with mutants carrying Arg-->Ile substitution at sites 207 and 217 in the L-subunit

After the light-induced charge separation in the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the electron reaches, via the tightly bound ubiquinone QA, the loosely bound ubiquinone Q(B) After two subsequent flashes of light, Q(B) is reduced to ubiquinol Q(B)H2, with a semiquinone anion Q-(B) formed as an intermediate after the first flash. We studied Q(B)H2 formation in chromatophores from Rb. sphaeroides mutants that carried Arg-->Ile substitution at sites 207 and 217 in the L-subunit. While Arg-L207 is 17 A away from Q(B), Arg-L217 is closer (9 A) and contacts the Q(B)-binding pocket. From the pH dependence of the charge recombination in the RC after the first flash, we estimated deltaG(AB), the free energy difference between the Q-(A)Q(B) and Q(A)Q-(B) states, and pK212, the apparent pK of Glu-L212, a residue that is only 4 A away from Q(B). As expected, the replacement of positively charged arginines by neutral isoleucines destabilized the Q-(B) state in the L217RI mutant to a larger extent than in the L207RI one. Also as expected, pK212 increased by approximately 0.4 pH units in the L207RI mutant. The value of pK212 in the L217RI mutant decreased by 0.3 pH units, contrary to expectations. The rate of the Q-(A)Q-(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)H2 transition upon the second flash, as monitored by electrometry via the accompanying changes in the membrane potential, was two times faster in the L207RI mutant than in the wild-type, but remained essentially unchanged in the L217RI mutant. To rationalize these findings, we developed and analyzed a kinetic model of the Q-(A)Q-(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)H2 transition. The model properly described the available experimental data and provided a set of quantitative kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the Q(B) turnover. The non-electrostatic, 'chemical' affinity of the QB site to protons proved to be as important for the attracting protons from the bulk, as the appropriate electrostatic potential. The mutation-caused changes in the chemical proton affinity could be estimated from the difference between the experimentally established pK2J2 shifts and the expected changes in the electrostatic potential at Glu-L212, calculable from the X-ray structure of the RC. Based on functional studies, structural data and kinetic modeling, we suggest a mechanistic scheme of the QB turnover. The detachment of the formed ubiquinol from its proximal position next to Glu-L212 is considered as the rate-limiting step of the reaction cycle.

Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers

The bacterial reaction center couples light-induced electron transfer to proton pumping across the membrane by reactions of a quinone molecule Q(B) that binds two electrons and two protons at the active site. This article reviews recent experimental work on the mechanism of the proton-coupled electron transfer and the pathways for proton transfer to the Q(B) site. The mechanism of the first electron transfer, k((1))(AB), Q(-)(A)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(-)(B), was shown to be rate limited by conformational gating. The mechanism of the second electron transfer, k((2))(AB), was shown to involve rapid reversible proton transfer to the semiquinone followed by rate-limiting electron transfer, H(+)+Q(-)(A)Q(-)(B) ifQ(-)(A)Q(B)H-->Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-). The pathways for transfer of the first and second protons were elucidated by high-resolution X-ray crystallography as well as kinetic studies showing changes in the rate of proton transfer due to site directed mutations and metal ion binding.

Proton uptake by bacterial reaction centers: the protein complex responds in a similar manner to the reduction of either quinone acceptor

In bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers, the protonation events associated with the different reduction states of the two quinone molecules constitute intrinsic probes of both the electrostatic interactions and the different kinetic events occurring within the protein in response to the light-generated introduction of a charge. The kinetics and stoichiometries of proton uptake on formation of the primary semiquinone Q(A)(-) and the secondary acceptor Q(B)(-) after the first and second flashes have been measured, at pH 7.5, in reaction centers from genetically modified strains and from the wild type. The modified strains are mutated at the L212Glu and/or at the L213Asp sites near Q(B); some of them carry additional mutations distant from the quinone sites (M231Arg --> Leu, M43Asn --> Asp, M5Asn --> Asp) that compensate for the loss of L213Asp. Our data show that the mutations perturb the response of the protein system to the formation of a semiquinone, how distant compensatory mutations can restore the normal response, and the activity of a tyrosine residue (M247Ala --> Tyr) in increasing and accelerating proton uptake. The data demonstrate a direct correlation between the kinetic events of proton uptake that are observed with the formation of either Q(A)(-) or Q(B)(-), suggesting that the same residues respond to the generation of either semiquinone species. Therefore, the efficiency of transferring the first proton to Q(B) is evident from examination of the pattern of H(+)/Q(A)(-) proton uptake. This delocalized response of the protein complex to the introduction of a charge is coordinated by an interactive network that links the Q(-) species, polarizable residues, and numerous water molecules that are located in this region of the reaction center structure. This could be a general property of transmembrane redox proteins that couple electron transfer to proton uptake/release reactions.

Characterization of the photoreduction of the secondary quinone QB in the photosynthetic reaction center from rhodobacter capsulatus with FTIR spectroscopy

The photoreduction of the secondary quinone acceptor QB in reaction centers (RCs) of the photosynthetic bacteria Rhodobacter (Rb.) capsulatus has been investigated by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy in 1H2O and 2H2O. The Q-B/QB FTIR spectra reflect reorganization of the protein upon electron transfer, changes of protonation state of carboxylic acid groups, and (semi)quinone-protein interactions. As expected from the conservation of most of the amino acids near QB in the RCs from Rb. capsulatus and Rb. sphaeroides, several protein and quinone IR bands are common to both spectra, e.g., the 1728 cm-1 band is assigned to proton uptake by a carboxylic acid residue, most probably Glu L212 as previously proposed for Rb. sphaeroides RCs. However, noticeable changes are observed at 1709 cm-1 (deprotonation of a Glu or Asp residue), 1674 and 1659 cm-1 (side chain and/or backbone), around 1540 cm-1 (amide II), and in the semiquinone absorption range. This FTIR study demonstrates that the environment of the secondary quinone in Rb. capsulatus is close but not identical to that in Rb. sphaeroides suggesting slight differences in the structural organization of side chains and/or ordered water molecules near QB.

Second-site suppressor mutations for the Arg70 substitution mutants of the Tn10-encoded metal-tetracycline/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli

The positive charge of the Arg70 residue in the cytoplasmic loop of the Tn10-encoded metal-tetracycline/H+ antiporter (Tet(B)) of Escherichia coli is essential for the tetracycline transport function (Y. Someya and A. Yamaguchi, Biochemistry 35, 9385-9391 (1996)). In this study, we found that the R70A mutation was suppressed by the second-site mutation of Thr171 to Ser. The T171S mutation suppressed any mutations at position 70 regardless of the amino acid residue introduced. The R70A and R70C mutations were also suppressed by the T171A or T171C mutations, but not by the T171Y mutation, indicating that the decrease in the side chain volume at position 171 is essential for the suppression. Tetracycline transport activity of the R70C mutant was stimulated by Hg2+ because mercaptide formed between the SH group of Cys70 and Hg2+ worked as a functional positively-charged side chain. The activity of the R70A/R71C/T171S mutant was also stimulated by Hg2+, whereas those of the R70A/R71C, R71C, and R71C/T171S mutants were not, indicating that the T171S mutation causes the switching of the functional positive charge at position 70 to 71. Since Thr171 is in the middle of the transmembrane helix VI, the switching may be based on a remote conformational effect.

The interaction of quinone and detergent with reaction centers of purple bacteria. I. Slow quinone exchange between reaction center micelles and pure detergent micelles

The kinetics of light-induced electron transfer in reaction centers (RCs) from the purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides were studied in the presence of the detergent lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide (LDAO). After the light-induced electron transfer from the primary donor (P) to the acceptor quinone complex, the dark re-reduction of P+ reflects recombination from the reduced acceptor quinones, QA- or QB-. The secondary quinone, QB, which is loosely bound to the RC, determines the rate of this process. Electron transfer to QB slows down the return of the electron to P+, giving rise to a slow phase of the recovery kinetics with time tau P approximately 1 s, whereas charge recombination in RCs lacking QB generates a fast phase with time tau AP approximately 0.1 s. The amount of quinone bound to RC micelles can be reduced by increasing the detergent concentration. The characteristic time of the slow component of P+ dark relaxation, observed at low quinone content per RC micelle (at high detergent concentration), is about 1.2-1.5 s, in sharp contrast to expectations from previous models, according to which the time of the slow component should approach the time of the fast component (about 0.1 s) when the quinone concentration approaches zero. To account for this large discrepancy, a new quantitative approach has been developed to analyze the kinetics of electron transfer in isolated RCs with the following key features: 1) The exchange of quinone between different micelles (RC and detergent micelles) occurs more slowly than electron transfer from QB- to P+; 2) The exchange of quinone between the detergent "phase" and the QB binding site within the same RC micelle is much faster than electron transfer between QA- and P+; 3) The time of the slow component of P+ dark relaxation is determined by (n) > or = 1, the average number of quinones in RC micelles, calculated only for those RC micelles that have at least one quinone per RC (in excess of QA). An analytical function is derived that relates the time of the slow component of P+ relaxation, tau P, and the relative amplitude of the slow phase. This provides a useful means of determining the true equilibrium constant of electron transfer between QA and QB (LAB), and the association equilibrium constant of quinone binding at the QB site (KQ+). We found that LAB = 22 +/- 3 and KQ = 0.6 +/- 0.2 at pH 7.5. The analysis shows that saturation of the QB binding site in detergent-solubilized RCs is difficult to achieve with hydrophobic quinones. This has important implications for the interpretation of apparent dependencies of QB function on environmental parameters (e.g. pH) and on mutational alterations. The model accounts for the effects of detergent and quinone concentration on electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex, and the conclusions are of general significance for the study of quinone-binding membrane proteins in detergent solutions.

A native electrostatic environment near Q(B) is not sufficient to ensure rapid proton delivery in photosynthetic reaction centers

Flash-induced absorption spectroscopy has been used to characterize Rhodobacter capsulatus reaction centers mutated in the secondary quinone acceptor site (Q(B). We compared the wild-type, the L212Glu-L213Asp --> Ala-Ala photosynthetically incompetent double mutant (DM), and two photocompetent revertants, the DM+L217Arg --> Cys and the DM+M5Asn- --> Asp strains. The electrostatic environment for Q(B)- is different in the two revertant strains. Only the L217Arg --> Cys mutation nearly restores the native electrostatic environment of Q(B)-. However, the level of recovery of the reaction center function, measured by the rates of second electron transfer and cytochrome c turnover, is quite incomplete in both strains. This shows that a wild-type-like electrostatic environment of Q(B)- cannot ensure on its own, rapid and efficient proton transfer to Q(B)-.

The heme redox center of chloroplast cytochrome f is linked to a buried five-water chain

The crystal structure of the 252-residue lumen-side domain of reduced cytochrome f, a subunit of the proton-pumping integral cytochrome b6f complex of oxygenic photosynthetic membranes, was determined to a resolution of 1.96 A from crystals cooled to -35 degrees. The model was refined to an R-factor of 15.8% with a 0.013-A RMS deviation of bond lengths from ideality. Compared to the structure of cytochrome f at 20 degrees, the structure at -35 degrees has a small change in relative orientation of the two folding domains and significantly lower isotropic temperature factors for protein atoms. The structure revealed an L-shaped array of five buried water molecules that extend in two directions from the N delta 1 of the heme ligand His 25. The longer branch extends 11 A within the large domain, toward Lys 66 in the prominent basic patch at the top of the large domain, which has been implicated in the interaction with the electron acceptor, plastocyanin. The water sites are highly occupied, and their temperature factors are comparable to those of protein atoms. Virtually all residues that form hydrogen bonds with the water chain are invariant among 13 known cytochrome f sequences. The water chain has many features that optimize it as a proton wire, including insulation from the protein medium. It is suggested that this chain may function as the lumen-side exit port for proton translocation by the cytochrome b6f complex.

Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis

Based on new Rhodopseudomonas (Rp.) viridis reaction center (RC) coordinates with a reliable structure of the secondary acceptor quinone (QB) site, a continuum dielectric model and finite difference technique have been used to identify clusters of electrostatically interacting ionizable residues. Twenty-three residues within a distance of 25 A from QB (QB cluster) have been shown to be strongly electrostatically coupled to QB, either directly or indirectly. An analogous cluster of 24 residues is found to interact with QA (QA cluster). Both clusters extend to the cytoplasmic surface in at least two directions. However, the QB cluster differs from the QA cluster in that it has a surplus of acidic residues, more strong electrostatic interactions, is less solvated, and experiences a strong positive electrostatic field arising from the polypeptide backbone. Consequently, upon reduction of QA or QB, it is the QB cluster, and not the QA cluster, which is responsible for substoichiometric proton uptake at neutral pH. The bulk of the changes in the QB cluster are calculated to be due to the protonation of a tightly coupled cluster of the three Glu residues (L212, H177, and M234) within the QB cluster. If the lifetime of the doubly reduced state QB2- is long enough, Asp M43 and Ser L223 are predicted to also become protonated. The calculated complex titration behavior of the strongly interacting residues of the QB cluster and the resulting electrostatic response to electron transfer may be a common feature in proton-transferring membrane protein complexes.

Three-dimensional structures of photosynthetic reaction centers

In this article, the three-dimensional structures of photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) are presented mainly on the basis of the X-ray crystal structures of the RCs from the purple bacteria Rhodopseudomonas (Rp.) viridis and Rhodobacter (Rb.) sphaeroides. In contrast to earlier comparisons and on the basis of the best-defined Rb. sphaeroides structure, a number of the reported differences between the structures cannot be confirmed. However, there are small conformational differences which might provide a basis for the explanation of observed spectral and functional discrepancies between the two species.A particular focus in this review is on the binding site of the secondary quinone (QB), where electron transfer is coupled to the uptake of protons from the cytoplasm. For the discussion of the QB site, a number of newlydetermined coordinate sets of Rp. viridis RCs modified at the QB site have been included. In addition, chains of ordered water molecules are found leading from the cytoplasm to the QB site in the best-defined structures of both Rp. viridis and Rb. sphaeroides RCs.

Electrostatic dominoes: long distance propagation of mutational effects in photosynthetic reaction centers of Rhodobacter capsulatus

Two point mutants from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus, both modified in the M protein of the photosynthetic reaction center, have been studied by flash-induced absorbance spectroscopy. These strains carry either the M231Arg --> Leu or M43ASN --> Asp mutations, which are located 9 and 15 A, respectively, from the terminal electron acceptor QB. In the wild-type Rb. sphaeroides structure, M231Arg is involved in a conserved salt bridge with H125Glu and H232Glu and M43Asn is located among several polar residues that form or surround the QB binding site. These substitutions were originally uncovered in phenotypic revertants isolated from the photosynthetically incompetent L212Glu-L213Asp --> Ala-Ala site-specific double mutant. As second-site suppressor mutations, they have been shown to restore the proton transfer function that is interrupted in the L212Ala-L213Ala double mutant. The electrostatic effects that are induced in reaction centers by the M231Arg --> Leu and M43Asn --> Asp substitutions are roughly the same in either the double-mutant or wild-type backgrounds. In a reaction center that is otherwise wild type in sequence, they decrease the free energy gap between the QA- and QB- states by 24 +/- 5 and 45 +/- 5 meV, respectively. The pH dependences of K2, the QA-QB <--> QAQB- equilibrium constant, are altered in reaction centers that carry either of these substitutions, revealing differences in the pKas of titratable groups compared to the wild type.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The rates of proton uptake and electron transfer at the reducing side of photosystem II in thylakoids

Proton and electron transfer at the reducing side of photosystem II of green plants was studied under flashing light, the former at improved time resolution by using Neutral red. The rates of electron transfer within QAFeQB were determined by pump-probe flashes through electrochromic transients. The extent of proton binding was about 1 H+/e-. The rates of proton transfer were proportional to the concentration of Neutral red (collisional transfer), whereas the rates of electron transfer out of QA- and from QAFeQB- to the cytochrome b6f complex were constant. The half-rise times of electron transfer (tau e) and the apparent times of proton binding (tau h) at 30 microM Neutral red were: QA- --> FeIIIQB (tau c < or = 100 microseconds, tau h = 230 microseconds); QA- --> FeIIQB (tau c = 150 microseconds, tau h = 760 microseconds); and QA- --> FeIIQB (tau c = 150 microseconds, tau h = 760 microseconds); and QA- --> FeIIQB (tau c = 620 microseconds, tau h = 310 microseconds).

Proton conduction within the reaction centers of Rhodobacter capsulatus: the electrostatic role of the protein

Light-induced charge separation in the photosynthetic reaction center results in delivery of two electrons and two protons to the terminal quinone acceptor QB. In this paper, we have used flash-induced absorbance spectroscopy to study three strains that share identical amino acid sequences in the QB binding site, all of which lack the protonatable amino acids Glu-L212 and Asp-L213. These strains are the photosynthetically incompetent site-specific mutant Glu-L212/Asp-L213-->Ala-L212/Ala-L213 and two different photocompetent derivatives that carry both alanine substitutions and an intergenic suppressor mutation located far from QB (class 3 strain, Ala-Ala + Arg-M231-->Leu; class 4 strain, Ala-Ala + Asn-M43-->Asp). At pH 8 in the double mutant, we observe a concomitant decrease of nearly 4 orders of magnitude in the rate constants of second electron and proton transfer to QB compared to the wild type. Surprisingly, these rates are increased to about the same extent in both types of suppressor strains but remain > 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those of the wild type. In the double mutant, at pH 8, the loss of Asp-L213 and Glu-L212 leads to a substantial stabilization (> or = 60 meV) of the semiquinone energy level. Both types of compensatory mutations partially restore, to nearly the same level, the original free energy difference for electron transfer from primary quinone QA to QB. The pH dependence of the electron and proton transfer processes in the double-mutant and the suppressor strains suggests that when reaction centers of the double mutant are shifted to lower pH (1.5-2 units), they function like those of the suppressor strains at physiological pH. Our data suggest that the main effect of the compensatory mutations is to partially restore the negative electrostatic environment of QB and to increase an apparent "functional" pK of the system for efficient proton transfer to the active site. This emphasizes the role of the protein in tuning the electrostatic environment of its cofactors and highlights the possible long-range electrostatic effects.

Crystallographic analyses of site-directed mutants of the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Seven site-directed mutants of the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from the 2.4.1 and WS 231 wild-type strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides have been crystallized and their X-ray diffraction analyzed to resolutions between 3.0 and 4.0 A. The mutations can be divided into four distinct categories: (1) mutations altering cofactor composition that affect electron transfer and quantum yield, His M202-->Leu (M202HL), His L173-->Leu (L173HL), and Leu M214-->His (M214LH); (2) a mutation in the proposed pathway of electron transfer altering electron-transfer kinetics, Tyr M210-->Phe (M210YF); (3) a mutation around the non-heme iron resulting in an iron-less reaction center, His M219-->Cys (M219HC); and (4) mutations around the secondary electron acceptor, a ubiquinone, affecting proton transfer and quinone turnover, Glu L212-->Gln (L212EQ) and Asp L213-->Asn (L213DN). Residues L173 and M202 are within bonding distance of the respective magnesiums of the two bacteriochlorophylls of the BChl special pair, while M214 is close to the bacteriopheophytin on the active A branch of the RC. The L173HL and M202HL crystal structures show that the respective bacteriochlorophylls are replaced with bacteriopheophytins (i.e., loss of magnesium) without significant structural perturbations to the surrounding main-chain or side-chain atoms. In the M214LH mutant, the bacteriopheophytin has been replaced by a bacteriochlorophyll, and the side chain of His M214 is within ligand distance of the magnesium. The M210YF, L212EQ, and L213DN mutants show no significant tertiary structure changes near the mutation sites. The M219HC diffraction data indicate that the overall tertiary structure of the reaction center is maintained in the absence of the non-heme iron.

Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: role of aspartate-L213 in proton transfers associated with reduction of quinoneto dihydroquinone

The role of Asp-L213 in proton transfer to reduced quinone QB in the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was studied by site-directed replacement of Asp with residues having different proton donor properties. Reaction centers (RCs) with Asn, Leu, Thr, and Ser at L213 had greatly reduced (approximately 6000-fold) proton-coupled electron transfer [kAB(2)] and proton uptake rates associated with the second electron reduction of QB (QA- QB- + 2H(+)-->QAQBH2) compared to native RCs. RCs containing Glu at L213 showed faster (approximately 90-fold) electron and proton transfer rates than the other mutant RCs but were still reduced (approximately 70-fold) compared with native RCs. These results show that kAB(2) is larger when a carboxylic acid occupies the L213 site, consistent with the proposal that Asp-L213 is a component of a proton transfer chain. The reduced kAB(2) observed with Glu versus Asp at L213 suggests that Asp at L213 is important for proton transfer for some other reason in addition to its proton transfer capabilities. Glu-L213 is estimated to have a higher apparent pKa (pKa > or = 7) than Asp-L213 (pKa < or = 4), as indicated by the slower rate of charge recombination (D+QAQB(-)-->DQAQB) in the mutant RCs. The importance of the pKa and charge of the residue at L213 for proton transfer are discussed. Based on these studies, a model for proton transfer is proposed in which Asp-L213 contributes to proton transfer in native RCs in two ways: (1) it is a component of a proton transfer chain connecting the buried QB molecule with the solvent and/or (2) it provides a negative charge that stabilizes a proton on or near QB.