Photoreceptor differentiation of isolated retinal precursor cells includes the capacity for photomechanical responses

Biochemical analysis of a rhodopsin photoactivatable GFP fusion as a model of G-protein coupled receptor transport

Rhodopsin is trafficked to the rod outer segment of vertebrate rod cells with high fidelity. When rhodopsin transport is disrupted retinal photoreceptors apoptose, resulting in the blinding disease autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Herein, we introduce rhodopsin-photoactivatable GFP-1D4 (rhodopsin-paGFP-1D4) for the purposes of monitoring rhodopsin transport in living cells. Rhodopsin-paGFP-1D4 contains photoactivatable GFP (paGFP) fused to rhodopsin's C-terminus and the last eight amino acids of rhodopsin (1D4) appended to the C-terminus of paGFP. The fusion protein binds the chromophore 11-cis retinal and photoisomerizes upon light activation similarly to rhodopsin. It activates the G-protein transducin with similar kinetics as does rhodopsin. Rhodopsin-paGFP-1D4 localizes to the same compartments, the primary cilium in cultured IMCD cells and the outer segment of rod cells, as rhodopsin in vitro and in vivo. This enables its use as a model of rhodopsin transport and details the importance of a free rhodopsin C-terminus in rod cell localization and health.

Plasticity of photoreceptor-generating retinal progenitors revealed by prolonged retinoic acid exposure

Background

Retinoic acid (RA) is important for vertebrate eye morphogenesis and is a regulator of photoreceptor development in the retina. In the zebrafish, RA treatment of postmitotic photoreceptor precursors has been shown to promote the differentiation of rods and red-sensitive cones while inhibiting the differentiation of blue- and UV-sensitive cones. The roles played by RA and its receptors in modifying photoreceptor fate remain to be determined.

Results

Treatment of zebrafish embryos with RA, beginning at the time of retinal progenitor cell proliferation and prior to photoreceptor terminal mitosis, resulted in a significant alteration of rod and cone mosaic patterns, suggesting an increase in the production of rods at the expense of red cones. Quantitative pattern analyses documented increased density of rod photoreceptors and reduced local spacing between rod cells, suggesting rods were appearing in locations normally occupied by cone photoreceptors. Cone densities were correspondingly reduced and cone photoreceptor mosaics displayed expanded and less regular spacing. These results were consistent with replacement of approximately 25% of positions normally occupied by red-sensitive cones, with additional rods. Analysis of embryos from a RA-signaling reporter line determined that multiple retinal cell types, including mitotic cells and differentiating rods and cones, are capable of directly responding to RA. The RA receptors RXRγ and RARαb are expressed in patterns consistent with mediating the effects of RA on photoreceptors. Selective knockdown of RARαb expression resulted in a reduction in endogenous RA signaling in the retina. Knockdown of RARαb also caused a reduced production of rods that was not restored by simultaneous treatments with RA.

Conclusions

These data suggest that developing retinal cells have a dynamic sensitivity to RA during retinal neurogenesis. In zebrafish RA may influence the rod vs. cone cell fate decision. The RARαb receptor mediates the effects of endogenous, as well as exogenous RA, on rod development.

Properties of growth and molecular profiles of rat progenitor cells from ciliary epithelium

Recent studies have demonstrated that multipotent retinal stem or progenitor cells can be isolated from the ciliary epithelium (CE) of the eye using a neurosphere culture. In this study, we investigated the properties of growth and differentiation, and molecular profiles of rat adult ciliary epithelium (CE)-derived retinal progenitors and forebrain (FB) derived neurospheres. Under clonogenic culture conditions, we found that the CE-derived neurospheres contained fewer undifferentiated cells compared with the FB-derived neurospheres, and that CE-derived neurospheres initially expressed the set of Notch pathway molecules genes including Notch 1 and Delta 1, HES-1 and HES-5, but partially lose their expression after passaging. Furthermore, we found that the CE-derived neurospheres did not express several markers for in vivo embryonic retinal progenitors. Additionally, when the eye was divided into four subregions along its dorsoventral and nasotemporal axes and progenitor cells were obtained from the subregions, the progenitor cells did not express the subregion specific transcription factors, suggesting that subregional specificity is not maintained in vitro. Together, our results demonstrate that CE-derived progenitor cells may have intrinsic limitations in the production of cell types.

Roles of cell-intrinsic and microenvironmental factors in photoreceptor cell differentiation

Photoreceptor differentiation requires the coordinated expression of numerous genes. It is unknown whether those genes share common regulatory mechanisms or are independently regulated by distinct mechanisms. To distinguish between these scenarios, we have used in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, and real-time PCR to analyze the expression of visual pigments and other photoreceptor-specific genes during chick embryo retinal development in ovo, as well as in retinal cell cultures treated with molecules that regulate the expression of particular visual pigments. In ovo, onset of gene expression was asynchronous, becoming detectable at the time of photoreceptor generation (ED 5-8) for some photoreceptor genes, but only around the time of outer segment formation (ED 14-16) for others. Treatment of retinal cell cultures with activin, staurosporine, or CNTF selectively induced or down-regulated specific visual pigment genes, but many cognate rod- or cone-specific genes were not affected by the treatments. These results indicate that many photoreceptor genes are independently regulated during development, are consistent with the existence of at least two distinct stages of gene expression during photoreceptor differentiation, suggest that intrinsic, coordinated regulation of a cascade of gene expression triggered by a commitment to the photoreceptor fate is not a general mechanism of photoreceptor differentiation, and imply that using a single photoreceptor-specific "marker" as a proxy to identify photoreceptor cell fate is problematic.

The interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus)

PURPOSE

Despite decades of investigation, the function of interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP), the most abundant protein in the interphotoreceptor matrix of vertebrates, remains enigmatic. Roles for IRBP in the visual cycle of rod photoreceptors and in the independent visual cycle of cone photoreceptors have been suggested, yet very little is known of the biology of IRBP in cone-dominant retinas, such as those of diurnal birds. Our aim was to identify and characterize expression of the IRBP of the cone-dominant chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus).

METHODS

Chicken IRBP mRNA was identified by PCR cloning. Primary protein structure, genomic organization, and phylogenies were determined through comparative sequence analyses. Expression of IRBP mRNA was characterized by northern analysis and by in situ hybridization on cryosectioned chicken retina. Expression of the IRBP protein was characterized by western blotting and by indirect immunofluorescence on cryosectioned retina and on retinal whole mounts.

RESULTS

The chicken IRBP gene encodes a secreted protein with a predicted 1,252 amino acid length. The gene structure for chicken IRBP resembles that of most other vertebrates, with four homologous, modular repeats and introns within only the fourth module. Each module is more homologous with the corresponding module in other species than it is with the remaining chicken modules. Chicken retinal tissue contains a single IRBP mRNA transcript of approximately 4.8 kb and western analysis of chicken retina shows a single major band of 140 kDa. Chicken IRBP mRNA is expressed exclusively by retinal photoreceptor cells and the intensity of the hybridization signal shows light/dark rhythmicity. The IRBP protein is localized to the interphotoreceptor matrix of the chicken retina and to intracellular regions of photoreceptors, with a spatial distribution indicating an association with cone outer segments.

CONCLUSIONS

The high degree of conservation of IRBP's primary structure, genomic organization, and cell-specific expression within the retinas of all vertebrates examined to date, including those with cone-dominant retinas, implies a conserved role for IRBP in photoreceptor function and/or health. Expression of chicken IRBP and its mRNA are functionally regulated. This report provides a necessary first step to explore a specific function for IRBP in the cone visual cycle.

Melatonin synthesis in retina: circadian regulation of arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase activity in cultured photoreceptor cells of embryonic chicken retina

The key regulatory enzyme in melatonin synthesis is arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT). In vivo, AANAT activity in chicken retinal photoreceptor cells exhibits a circadian rhythm that peaks at night. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the temporal development of light/dark and circadian oscillations of AANAT activity in cultured retinal cells prepared from 6- and 8-day-old chicken embryos (E6, E8, respectively). Photoreceptor cells prepared from E6 retinas and incubated under a 14-h light/10-h dark (LD) cycle of illumination for 5-7 days displayed prominent daily fluctuations in AANAT activity on days 5 and 6 in vitro. However, when E6 cells, incubated for 5 days under LD, were transferred to continuous (24 h/day) darkness (DD) on day 6, no daily pattern of activity was observed. This result indicates that AANAT fluctuations were light-driven and not circadian at this stage. In contrast, cells prepared from E8 embryos and incubated under conditions identical to those for E6 cells displayed prominent rhythms of AANAT activity in both LD and DD, indicative of circadian control. To determine if circadian control of AANAT activity would develop in E6 cells incubated for a longer period of time to allow maturation, cells were incubated for 8 days in LD followed by 2 days in DD. AANAT activity in these cells was rhythmic in both LD and DD. In cells incubated in this manner, a 2-h light pulse in the middle of the subjective night suppressed AANAT activity, indicating that the enzyme activity in the cultured cells is acutely suppressed by light, as it is in vivo. These results indicate that the ability to express circadian regulation of AANAT activity is an intrinsic property of retinal cells that can develop in vitro. Development of light-dark regulation of AANAT activity appears to precede the circadian clock-control of enzyme activity.

A model of retinal cell differentiation in the chick embryo

This article presents an overview of retinal cell differentiation in the chick embryo, in the context of a hypothetical model based on information generated during the last several years. The model proposes that: (1) most (if not all) proliferating neuroepithelial cells have the potential to give rise to a progeny comprising two or more different cell types; (2) the time at which cells undergo their terminal mitosis does not determine their differentiated fate; (3) many postmitotic precursor cells remain plastic (i.e., uncommitted) for some time after terminal mitosis, during which they encounter position-dependent signals as they migrate toward their definitive laminar position within the retina; (4) as a consequence of these inductive stimuli, precursor cells that migrate to different retinal layers express different transcriptional regulators; (5) morphologically undifferentiated precursor cells are committed to cell type-specific, complex patterns of differentiation, which they can express even when isolated from their normal microenvironment, and (6) even after precursor cells become committed to a specific identity, additional inductive signals are necessary for the cells to complete the development of a fully mature phenotype. The article presents a summary of the supportive evidence, as well as a critical evaluation of the model, and concludes with an overview of unanswered questions regarding retinal cell differentiation and a brief evaluation of the prospects for further progress in this field.