RNA polymerase binding using a strongly acidic hydrophobic-repeat region of sigma 54

A Bacteriophage DNA Mimic Protein Employs a Non-specific Strategy to Inhibit the Bacterial RNA Polymerase

DNA mimicry by proteins is a strategy that employed by some proteins to occupy the binding sites of the DNA-binding proteins and deny further access to these sites by DNA. Such proteins have been found in bacteriophage, eukaryotic virus, prokaryotic, and eukaryotic cells to imitate non-coding functions of DNA. Here, we report another phage protein Gp44 from bacteriophage SPO1 of Bacillus subtilis, employing mimicry as part of unusual strategy to inhibit host RNA polymerase. Consisting of three simple domains, Gp44 contains a DNA binding motif, a flexible DNA mimic domain and a random-coiled domain. Gp44 is able to anchor to host genome and interact bacterial RNA polymerase via the β and β' subunit, resulting in bacterial growth inhibition. Our findings represent a non-specific strategy that SPO1 phage uses to target different bacterial transcription machinery regardless of the structural variations of RNA polymerases. This feature may have potential applications like generation of genetic engineered phages with Gp44 gene incorporated used in phage therapy to target a range of bacterial hosts.

Regulation of type VI secretion gene clusters by sigma54 and cognate enhancer binding proteins

Type VI secretion systems (T6SS) are bacteriophage-derived macromolecular machines responsible for the release of at least two proteins in the milieu, which are thought to form an extracellular appendage. Although several T6SS have been shown to be involved in the virulence of animal and plant pathogens, clusters encoding these machines are found in the genomes of most species of gram-negative bacteria, including soil, marine, and environmental isolates. T6SS have been associated with several phenotypes, ranging from virulence to biofilm formation or stress sensing. Their various environmental niches and large diversity of functions are correlated with their broad variety of regulatory mechanisms. Using a bioinformatic approach, we identified several clusters, including those of Vibrio cholerae, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, and a Marinomonas sp., which possess typical -24/-12 sequences, recognized by the alternate sigma factor sigma 54 (σ(54) or σ(N)). σ(54), which directs the RNA polymerase to these promoters, requires the action of a bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP), which binds to cis-acting upstream activating sequences. Putative bEBPs are encoded within the T6SS gene clusters possessing σ(54) boxes. Using in vitro binding experiments and in vivo reporter fusion assays, we showed that the expression of these clusters is dependent on both σ(54) and bEBPs.

Structure of the RNA polymerase core-binding domain of sigma(54) reveals a likely conformational fracture point

Transcription initiation by bacterial sigma(54)-RNA polymerase requires a conformational change of the holopolymerase-DNA complex, driven by an enhancer-binding protein. Although structures of the core polymerase and the more common sigma(70) factor have been determined, little is known about the structure of the sigma(54) variant. We report here the structure of an Aquifex aeolicus sigma(54) domain (residues 69-198), which binds core RNA polymerase. The structure is composed of two distinct subdomains held together by a small, conserved hydrophobic interface that appears to act as a fracture point in the structure. The N-terminal, four-helical subdomain has a negative surface and conserved residues that likely contact the core polymerase, while the C-terminal, three-helical bundle has a strongly positive patch that could contact DNA. Sequence conservation indicates that these structural features are conserved and are important for the role of sigma(54) in the polymerase complex.

Roles of genes 44, 50, and 51 in regulating gene expression and host takeover during infection of Bacillus subtilis by bacteriophage SPO1

We show that the products of SPO1 genes 44, 50, and 51 are required for the normal transition from early to middle gene expression during infection of Bacillus subtilis by bacteriophage SPO1; that they are also required for control of the shutoff of host DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis; and that their effects on host shutoff could be accounted for by their effects on the regulation of gene expression. These three gene products had four distinguishable effects in regulating SPO1 gene expression: (i) gp44-50-51 acted to restrain expression of all SPO1 genes tested, (ii) gp44 and/or gp50-51 caused additional specific repression of immediate-early genes, (iii) gp44 and/or gp50-51 stimulated expression of middle genes, and (iv) gp44 and/or gp50-51 stimulated expression of some delayed-early genes. Shutoff of immediate-early gene expression also required the activity of gp28, the middle-gene-specific sigma factor. Shutoff of host RNA and protein synthesis was accelerated by either the 44- single mutant or the 50(-)51(-) double mutant and more so by the 44(-)50(-)51(-) triple mutant. Shutoff of host DNA synthesis was accelerated by the mutants early in infection but delayed by the 44(-)50(-)51(-) triple mutant at later times. Although gp50 is a very small protein, consisting almost entirely of an apparent membrane-spanning domain, it contributed significantly to each activity tested. We identify SPO1 genes 41 to 51 and 53 to 60 as immediate-early genes; genes 27, 28, and 37 to 40 as delayed-early genes; and gene 52 as a middle gene.

Binding affinity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase*sigma54 holoenzyme for the glnAp2, nifH and nifL promoters

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase associated with the sigma54 factor (RNAP*sigma54) is a holoenzyme form that transcribes a special class of promoters not recognized by the standard RNA polymerase*sigma70 com plex. Promoters for RNAP*sigma54 vary in their overall 'strength' and show differences in their response to the presence of DNA curvature between enhancer and promoter. In order to examine whether these effects are related to the promoter affinity, we have determined the equilibrium dissociation constant K(d) for the binding of RNAP*sigma54 to the three promoters glnAp2, nifH and nifL. Binding studies were conducted by monitoring the changes in fluorescence anisotropy upon titrating RNAP*sigma54 to carboxyrhodamine-labeled DNA duplexes. For the glnAp2 and nifH promoters similar values of K(d) = 0.94 +/- 0.55 nM and K(d) = 0.85 +/- 0.30 nM were determined at physiological ionic strength, while the nifL promoter displayed a significantly weaker affinity with K(d) = 8.5 +/- 1.9 nM. The logarithmic dependence of K(d) on the ionic strength I was -Deltalog(K(d))/Deltalog(I) = 6.1 +/- 0.5 for the glnAp2, 5.2 +/- 1.2 for the nifH and 2.1 +/- 0.1 for the nifL promoter. This suggests that the polymerase can form fewer ion pairs with the nifL promoter, which would account for its weaker binding affinity.

Single amino acid substitution mutants of Klebsiella pneumoniae sigma(54) defective in transcription

Transcription initiation by the sigma(54) RNA polymerase requires specialised activators and their associated nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis. To explore the roles of sigma(54) in initiation we used random mutagenesis of rpoN and an in vivo activity screen to isolate functionally altered sigma(54) proteins. Five defective mutants, each with a different single amino acid substitution, were obtained. Three failed in transcription after forming a closed complex. One such mutant mapped to regulatory Region I of sigma(54), the other two to Region III. The Region I mutant allowed transcription independently of activator and showed reduced activator-dependent sigma(54) isomerisation. The two Region III mutants displayed altered behaviour in a sigma(54) isomerisation assay and one failed to stably bind early melted DNA as the holoenzyme; they may contribute to a communication pathway linking changes in sigma to open complex formation. Two further Region III mutants showed gross defects in overall DNA binding. For one, sufficient residual DNA binding activity remained to allow us to demonstrate that other activities were largely unaffected. Changes in DNA binding preferences and core polymerase-dependent properties were evident amongst the mutants.

The role of region II in the RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(N) (sigma(54))

Bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzymes containing the sigma subunit sigma(N) (sigma(54)) can form a stable closed complex with promoter DNA but only undergo transition to an open complex and transcription initiation when acted on by an activator protein. Proteins of the sigma(N) family have a conserved N-terminal region of 50 amino acids (Region I) that is separated from a conserved C-terminal region of around 360 amino acids (Region III) by a much more variable sequence of between 30 and 110 residues (Region II). We have investigated the role of Region II in Klebsiella pneumoniae sigma(N) by studying the properties of deletions of all or part of the region both in vivo and in vitro. We found that whilst Region II is not essential, deletion of all or part of it can significantly impair sigma(N) activity. Deletions have effects on DNA binding by the isolated sigma factor and on holoenzyme formation, but the most marked effects are on transition of the holoenzyme from the closed to the open complex in the presence of the activator protein.

The hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 is essential for core RNA polymerase binding

Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 contains motifs that resemble closely those used for RNA polymerase II in mammalian cells, including two hydrophobic heptad repeats, a very acidic region and a glutamine-rich region. Triple changes in hydrophobic or multiple changes in acidic residues in Region III are known to severely impair core-binding ability. To investigate whether all the changes in triple mutants are necessary for core binding, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to create single and double mutants in the leucine or isoleucine residues in the heptad repeat in Region III. Single mutants showed no discernible loss of function. Double mutants showed partial protection of the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter due to the partial loss of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase. These mutations were deleterious to the function of sigma 54, which retained only 30-40% of wild-type mRNA levels. However, double mutants retained nearly normal ability to form open complexes. Two triple mutants created during previous work lost most, if not all, of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase, to protect the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter and to open the transcription start site. The two triple mutants produced about 20% or less than 10% of the wild-type transcripts from the glnAp2 promoter. These results demonstrate that the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III is essential for core RNA polymerase binding. Progressive loss of hydrophobicity of the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of sigma 54 resulted in a progressive loss of core-binding ability, leading to the loss of -12 promoter element recognition and mRNA production.

Involvement of the sigmaN DNA-binding domain in open complex formation

sigmaN (sigma54) RNA polymerase holoenzyme closed complexes isomerize to open complexes in a reaction requiring nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis by enhancer binding activator proteins. Here, we characterize Klebsiella pneumoniae sigmaN mutants, altered in the carboxy DNA-binding domain (F354A/F355A, F402A, F403A and F402A/F403A), that fail in activator-dependent transcription. The mutant holoenzymes have altered activator-dependent interactions with promoter sequences that normally become melted. Activator-dependent stable complexes accumulated slowly in vitro (F402A) and to a reduced final level (F403A, F402A/F403A, F354A/F355A). Similar results were obtained in an assay of activator-independent stable complex formation. Premelted templates did not rescue the mutants for stable preinitiation complex formation but did for deleted region I sigmaN, suggesting different defects. The DNA-binding domain substitutions are within sigmaN sequences previously shown to be buried upon formation of the wild-type holoenzyme or closed complex, suggesting that, in the mutants, alteration of the sigmaN-core and sigmaN-DNA interfaces has occurred to change holoenzyme activity. Core-binding assays with the mutant sigmas support this view. Interestingly, an internal deletion form of sigmaN lacking the major core binding determinant was able to assemble into holoenzyme and, although unable to support activator-dependent transcription, formed a stable activator-independent holoenzyme promoter complex on premelted DNA templates.

Sequences in sigmaN determining holoenzyme formation and properties

Sigma subunits of bacterial RNA polymerases are closely involved in many steps of promoter-specific transcription initiation. Holoenzyme formed with the specialised minor sigma-N (sigmaN) protein binds rare promoters in a transcriptionally inactive state and functions in enhancer-dependent transcription. Using competition and dissociation assays, we show that sigmaN-holoenzyme has a stability comparable to the major sigma70-holoenzyme. Purified partial sequences of sigmaN were prepared and assayed for retention of core RNA polymerase binding activity. Two discrete fragments of sigmaN which both bind the core but with significantly different affinities were identified, demonstrating that the sigmaN interface with core RNA polymerase is extensive. The low affinity segment of sigmaN included region I sequences, an amino terminal domain which mediates activator responsiveness and formation of open promoter complexes. The higher affinity site lies within a 95 residue fragment of region III. We propose that the core to region I contact mediates properties of the sigmaN-holoenzyme important for enhancer responsiveness. Heparin is shown to dissociate sigmaN and core, indicating that disruption of the holoenzyme is involved in the heparin sensitivity of the sigmaN closed complex.

Scanning force microscopy of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.sigma54 holoenzyme complexes with DNA in buffer and in air

Scanning force microscopy (SFM) was used to visualize complexes of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.sigma54 (RNAP.sigma54) and a 1036 base-pair linear DNA fragment containing the glnA promoter. In order to preserve the native hydration state of the protein-DNA complexes, the samples were injected directly into the SFM fluid cell and imaged in buffer. With this protocol, an apparent bending angle of 26(+/-34) degrees was determined for the specific complexes at the promoter. The bending angle of the unspecifically bound RNAP.sigma54 showed a somewhat broader distribution of 49(+/-48) degrees, indicating the existence of conformational differences as compared to the closed complex. In about two-thirds of the closed complexes, the RNA polymerase holoenzyme was located in a lateral position with respect to the DNA and the bend of the DNA was pointing away from the protein. This conformation was consistent with the finding that for the complexes at the promoter, the apparent contour length was reduced by only about 6 nm in buffer as compared to the free DNA. From these results we conclude that in the closed complex of RNAP. sigma54, the DNA was not wrapped around the polymerase, and we present a model for the trajectory of the DNA with respect to the RNA polymerase. The images acquired in buffer were compared to samples that were washed with water and then dried before imaging. Two artefacts of the washing and drying process were detected. First, extensive washing of the sample reduced the number of the specific complexes bound at the promoter (closed complex of RNAP.sigma54) from about 70% to 30%. This is likely to be a result of sliding of the RNAP.sigma54 holoenzyme along the DNA induced by the washing process. Second, the apparent DNA shortening of the contour length of RNAP.sigma54-DNA complexes at the promoter as compared to the contour length of the free DNA was 22 nm for the dried samples as opposed to only 6 nm for the undried samples imaged in buffer. This suggests an artefact of the drying process.

Identification of an N-terminal region of sigma 54 required for enhancer responsiveness

Sigma 54 associates with bacterial core RNA polymerase and converts it into an enhancer-responsive enzyme. Deletion of the N-terminal 40 amino acids is known to result in loss of the ability to respond to enhancer binding proteins. In this work PCR mutagenesis and genetic screens were used to identify a small patch, from amino acids 33 to 37, that is required for proper response to activator in vivo. Site-directed single point mutants within this segment were constructed and studied. Two of these were defective in responding to the enhancer binding protein in vitro. The mutants could still direct the polymerase to bind to DNA and initiate transient melting. However, they failed in directing activator-dependent formation of a heparin-stable open complex. Thus, amino acid region 33 to 37 includes critical activation response determinants. This region overlaps the larger leucine patch negative-control region, suggesting that anti-inhibition and positive activation are closely coupled events.

Cloning and characterization of Planctomyces limnophilus rpoN: complementation of a Salmonella typhimurium rpoN mutant strain

The rpoN gene, which encodes the alternative sigma factor sigma 54, was cloned from the budding, peptidoglycan-less bacterium Planctomyces limnophilus. P. limnophilus rpoN complemented the Ntr- phenotype of a Salmonella typhimurium rpoN mutant strain. The P. limnophilus rpoN gene encoded a predicted polypeptide that was 495 residues in length and shared a significant homology with other members of the sigma 54 family. The protein sequence displayed all of the characteristic motifs found in members of this family, including the C-terminal helix-turn-helix motif and the well-conserved RpoN box. A potential sigma 54-dependent activator was also identified in P. limnophilus. These findings extend the range of phylogenetic groups within the Domain Bacteria that are known to contain sigma 54.

Probing the assembly of transcription initiation complexes through changes in sigmaN protease sensitivity

The alternative bacterial sigmaN RNA polymerase holoenzyme binds promoters as a transcriptionally inactive complex that is activated by enhancer-binding proteins. Little is known about how sigma factors respond to their ligands or how the responses lead to transcription. To examine the liganded state of sigmaN, the assembly of end-labeled Klebsiella pneumoniae sigmaN into holoenzyme, closed promoter complexes, and initiated transcription complexes was analyzed by enzymatic protein footprinting. V8 protease-sensitive sites in free sigmaN were identified in the acidic region II and bordering or within the minimal DNA binding domain. Interaction with core RNA polymerase prevented cleavage at noncontiguous sites in region II and at some DNA binding domain sites, probably resulting from conformational changes. Formation of closed complexes resulted in further protections within the DNA binding domain, suggesting close contact to promoter DNA. Interestingly, residue E36 becomes sensitive to proteolysis in initiated transcription complexes, indicating a conformational change in holoenzyme during initiation. Residue E36 is located adjacent to an element involved in nucleating strand separation and in inhibiting polymerase activity in the absence of activation. The sensitivity of E36 may reflect one or both of these functions. Changing patterns of protease sensitivity strongly indicate that sigmaN can adjust conformation upon interaction with ligands, a property likely important in the dynamics of the protein during transcription initiation.

Transcriptional activation via DNA-looping: visualization of intermediates in the activation pathway of E. coli RNA polymerase x sigma 54 holoenzyme by scanning force microscopy

Scanning force microscopy (SFM) has been used to study transcriptional activation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase x sigma 54 (RNAP x sigma 54) at the glnA promoter by the constitutive mutant NtrC(D54E,S160F) of the NtrC Protein (nitrogen regulatory protein C). DNA-protein complexes were deposited on mica and images were recorded in air. The DNA template was a 726 bp linear fragment with two NtrC binding sites located at the end and about 460 bp away from the RNAP x sigma 54 glnA promoter. By choosing appropriate conditions the structure of various intermediates in the transcription process could be visualized and analyzed: (1) different multimeric complexes of NtrC(D54E,S160F) dimers bound to the DNA template; (2) the closed complex of RNAP x sigma 54 at the glnA promoter; (3) association between DNA bound RNAP x sigma 54 and NtrC(D54E,S160F) with the intervening DNA looped out; and (4) the activated open promoter complex of RNAP x sigma 54. Measurements of the DNA bending angle of RNAP x sigma 54 closed promoter complexes yielded an apparent bending angle of 49(+/-24) degrees. Under conditions that allowed the formation of the open promoter complex, the distribution of bending angles displayed two peaks at 50(+/-24) degrees and 114(+/-18) degrees, suggesting that the transition from the RNAP x sigma 54 closed complex to the open complex is accompanied by an increase of the DNA bending angle.

Two domains within sigmaN (sigma54) cooperate for DNA binding

The sigma-N (sigmaN) subunit of the bacterial RNA polymerase is a sequence specific DNA-binding protein. The RNA polymerase holoenzyme formed with sigmaN binds to promoters in an inactive form and only initiates transcription when activated by enhancer-binding positive control proteins. We now provide evidence to show that the DNA-binding activity of sigmaN involves two distinct domains: a C-terminal DNA-binding domain that directly contacts DNA and an adjacent domain that enhances DNA-binding activity. The sequences required for the enhancement of DNA binding can be separated from the sequences required for core RNA polymerase binding. These results provide strong evidence for communication between domains within a transcription factor, likely to be important for the function of sigmaN in enhancer-dependent transcription.

Genetic analysis of the Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoter, using the P22 challenge phage system

In several genera of bacteria, the sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme (E sigma54) is a minor form of RNA polymerase that is responsible for transcribing genes whose products are involved in diverse metabolic processes. E sigma54 binds to the promoters of these genes to form a closed promoter complex. An activator protein is required for the transition of this closed promoter complex to an open complex that is transcriptionally competent. In this study, the P22-based challenge phage system was used to investigate interactions between E sigma54 and the Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoter. Challenge phages were constructed in which the R. meliloti nifH promoter replaced the binding site for the Mnt protein, a repressor of the phage P22 ant gene. When a Salmonella typhimurium strain that overexpressed sigma54 was infected with these challenge phages, E sigma54 bound to the nifH promoter and repressed transcription of the ant gene as seen by the increased frequency of lysogeny. Following mutagenesis of challenge phages that carried the R. meliloti nifH promoter, mutant phages that could form plaques on an S. typhimurium strain that overexpressed sigma54 were isolated. These phages had mutations within the nifH promoter that decreased the affinity of the promoter for E sigma54. The mutations were clustered in seven highly conserved residues within the -12 and -24 regions of the nifH promoter.

DNA-binding determinants of sigma 54 as deduced from libraries of mutations

PCR mutagenesis was used to obtain libraries of mutations in the region between amino acids 300 and 400 in the DNA-binding domain of Escherichia coli sigma 54. Two hundred changes that did not alter function were identified. These were compared with a somewhat smaller number of changes that did alter function. Several important regions were identified. Single point mutations in two of these, near amino acids 363 and 383, destroyed the ability of sigma to bind DNA, as assayed by band shift analysis. A third segment from amino acids 327 to 347 is also a candidate for contributing to DNA binding. Comparison with data in the literature leads to testable proposals for the complex mode of DNA binding that is associated with sigma 54.

Converting Escherichia coli RNA polymerase into an enhancer-responsive enzyme: role of an NH2-terminal leucine patch in sigma 54

The protein sigma 54 associates with Escherichia coli core RNA polymerase to form a holoenzyme that binds promoters but is inactive in the absence of enhancer activation. Here, mutants of sigma 54 enabled polymerases to transcribe without enhancer protein and adenosine triphosphate. The mutations are in leucines within the NH2-terminal glutamine-rich domain of sigma 54. Multiple leucine substitutions mimicked the effect of enhancer protein, which suggests that the enhancer protein functions to disrupt a leucine patch. The results indicate that sigma 54 acts both as an inhibitor of polymerase activity and as a receptor that interacts with enhancer protein to overcome this inhibition, and that these two activities jointly confer enhancer responsiveness.

Abortive cycling and the release of polymerase for elongation at the sigma 54-dependent glnAp2 promoter

Transcription initiation at the sigma 54-dependent glnAp2 promoter was studied to follow the state of polymerase as RNA synthesis begins. Sigma 54 polymerase begins transcription in abortive cycling mode, i.e. after the first bond is made, approximately 75% of the time the short RNA is aborted and synthesis must be restarted. Polymerase is capable of abortive initiation until it reaches a position beyond +3 and before +7, at which stage polymerase is released from its promoter contacts and an elongation complex is formed. INitial elongation is accompanied by two transcription bubbles, one moving with the polymerase and the other remaining at the transcription start site. The sigma 54-associated polymerase shows an earlier and more efficient transition out of abortive initiation mode than prior studies of sigma 70-associated polymerase.

PCR mutagenesis identifies a polymerase-binding sequence of sigma 54 that includes a sigma 70 homology region

Sigma 54 is a minor bacterial sigma factor that is not a member of the sigma 70 family of proteins but binds the same core RNA polymerase. Previously, we identified a region of sigma 54 that is important for binding core polymerase. In this work, PCR mutagenesis was used to identify specific amino acids important for this binding. The results show that important residues are clustered most closely in a short sequence that was previously speculated to be potentially homologous to a sequence in sigma 70. The mutagenesis also identifies important residues in the flanking hydrophobic-acidic region of sigma 54, which is absent in sigma 70. Overall, the data indicate that sigma 54 binds core polymerase through a sequence homologous to that of sigma 70 but in addition uses unique motifs to modify this interaction.

A novel bacterial transcription cycle involving sigma 54

sigma 54 is the promoter recognition subunit of the form of bacterial RNA polymerase that transcribes from promoters with enhancer elements. DNase footprinting experiments show that sigma 54 is attached selectively to the template strand, which must be single-stranded for transcription initiation. sigma 54 remains bound at the promoter after core polymerase begins elongation, in contrast to the well-established sigma 70-holoenzyme transcription cycle. Permanganate footprinting experiments show that the bound sigma 54 and the elongating core RNA polymerase downstream of it are each associated with a single-strand DNA region. Template commitment assays show that the promoter-bound sigma 54 must be reconfigured before reinitiation of transcription can occur. This unexpected pathway raises interesting possibilities for transcriptional regulation, especially with regard to control at the level of reinitiation.

Genes that protect against the host-killing activity of the E3 protein of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage SPO1

A cloned rpoB gene, specifying an apparently mutant RNA polymerase beta subunit, protected Escherichia coli against the cytocidal effects of the E3 protein of bacteriophage SPO1, suggesting that RNA polymerase is the primary cellular target of the E3 protein. Two segments of the wild-type E. coli genome, one of which specifies a suppressor of dnaK mutations, and thus, possibly, a molecular chaperone, also provided protection when overexpressed, but wild-type rpoB did not.

Identification of close contacts between the sigma N (sigma 54) protein and promoter DNA in closed promoter complexes

The complexes forming between the alternative sigma factor protein sigma N (sigma 54), its holoenzyme and promoter DNA were analysed using the hydroxyl radical probe and by photochemical footprinting of bromouridine-substituted DNA. Close contacts between the promoter, sigma N and its holoenzyme appear to be restricted predominantly to one face of the DNA helix, extending from -31 to -5. They all appear attributable to sigma N and no extra close contacts from the core RNA polymerase subunits in the holoenzyme-promoter DNA complex were detected. We suggest that the apparent absence of close core RNA polymerase contacts in the region of the promoter DNA to be melted during open complex formation is important for maintaining the closed complex. Results of the hydroxyl radical footprinting imply that sigma N makes multiple DNA backbone contacts across and beyond the -12, -24 consensus promoter elements, and the photochemical footprints indicate that consensus thymidine residues contribute important major groove contacts to sigma N. Formation of the open complex is shown to involve a major structural transition in the DNA contacted by sigma N, establishing a direct role for sigma N in formation of the activated promoter complex.