Genetic heterogeneity in isogenic homozygous clonal zebrafish

A Comparison of Isogenic Homozygous Clone and Wildtype Zebrafish (Danio rerio): Survival and Developmental Responses to Low pH Conditions

The value of bioassays as analytical methods for assessing the potency of particular stressors on live animal models depends on the precision of their results, which are greatly influenced by the choice of test subjects. The genetic makeup of experimental subjects varies, and, as such, so will their responses to the test environment. Genetic diversity of test populations may contribute to statistical variability; therefore, the use of genetically similar subjects may enhance the utility of bioassays. This study addresses the efficacy of using isogenic homozygous zebrafish (Danio rerio) as subjects for bioassays. Stress responses (acidic conditions) were compared during early development for gynogenetically produced isogenic homozygous line of zebrafish (C32) and wildtype (WT) zebrafish. Experiments evaluated early life stage milestones after exposure to low pH in water of a different electrolyte composition. Because the isogenic homozygous clonal (IHC) fish possessed far less genetic variability than the WT fish tested, it was predicted that the IHC fish would exhibit less variability in their response to stress. Although we found no significant differences in the variability between the responses of the IHC and WT fish, pH and water hardness level had a differential effect on the two groups. Simple strain differences may be the probable cause of the response differences to environmental stress. Factors that may affect stress response, such as heterogeneity, co-adapted gene complexes, and domestication, are discussed. Our findings and review of recent zebrafish literature stress the need for researchers to carefully consider breeding histories and trait characteristics for each potential test subject to maximize the sensitivity of the assay.

Generation of clonal zebrafish lines and transplantable hepatic tumors

Transplantable tumors are an accepted gold standard in cancer studies in rodents. The progress of this model in zebrafish has long been constrained by the lack of true inbred lines in zebrafish. We have generated several lines of homozygous diploid clonal zebrafish lines, which allow serial transplantations of tumor cells from one fish to another without sublethal gamma-irradiation. The spectrum of transplantable tumors that were initially induced and maintained in inbred clonal zebrafish lines was limited to different types of spontaneous and diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatic tumors. However, this model can readily be extended to a broad range of extrahepatic tumors, transgenic tumors with defined mechanisms of induction and fluorescence-tagged tumor lines. These models will further facilitate in-depth analysis of invasive tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis and tumor-initiating cells by in vivo imaging and provide a cost-effective system for high-throughput (HTP) screening of anticancer therapeutics, including biological response modifiers. In addition, homozygous zebrafish lines are an indispensable tool for immunogenetics, mapping of quantitative trait loci and other genetic applications. The whole procedure, from generation of a gynogenetic female homozygous fish (a founder) to obtaining 3-4 consecutive passages of a syngeneic tumor, takes approximately 12-18 months. This time-frame largely depends on methods of tumor induction, tumor type and tumor growth rate.

Genetic variation in the zebrafish

Although zebrafish was introduced as a laboratory model organism several decades ago and now serves as a primary model for developmental biology, there is only limited data on its genetic variation. An establishment of a dense polymorphism map becomes a requirement for effective linkage analysis and cloning approaches in zebrafish. By comparing ESTs to whole-genome shotgun data, we predicted >50,000 high-quality candidate SNPs covering the zebrafish genome with average resolution of 41 kbp. We experimentally validated approximately 65% of a randomly sampled subset by genotyping 16 samples from seven commonly used zebrafish strains. The analysis reveals very high nucleotide diversity between zebrafish isolates. Even with the limited number of samples that we genotyped, zebrafish isolates revealed considerable interstrain variation, ranging from 7% (inbred) to 37% (wild-derived) of polymorphic sites being heterozygous. The increased proportion of polymorphic over monomorphic sites results in five times more frequent observation of a three allelic variant compared with human or mouse. Phylogenetic analysis shows that comparisons between even the least divergent strains used in our analysis may provide one informative marker approximately every 500 nucleotides. Furthermore, the number of haplotypes per locus is relatively large, reflecting independent establishment of the different lines from wild isolates. Finally, our results suggest the presence of prominent C-to-U and A-to-I RNA editing events in zebrafish. Overall, the levels and organization of genetic variation between and within commonly used zebrafish strains are markedly different from other laboratory model organisms, which may affect experimental design and interpretation.

Assessment of polymorphism in zebrafish mapping strains

To assess the level of heterozygosity within two commonly used inbred mapping zebrafish strains, C32 and SJD, we genotyped polymorphic CA-repeat markers randomly dispersed throughout the zebrafish genome. (For clarity purposes we will primarily use the term polymorphic to define polymorphism between strains, and the term heterozygous to address heterogeneity within a strain.) Eight male individuals each from C32 and SJD stocks were typed for 235 and 183 markers, respectively. Over 90% of the markers typed were polymorphic between these two strains. We found a limited number of heterozygous markers persisting in clusters within each inbred line. In the SJD strain, these were mainly limited to a few telomeric regions or regions otherwise distant from centromeres. As expected, centromeric regions were homozygous in the SJD strain, consistent with its derivation from a single half-tetrad individual. In contrast, heterozygous clusters were distributed randomly throughout the genome in the C32 strain, and these clusters could be detected with linked polymorphic markers. Nevertheless, most regions of the C32 strain are homozygous for CA-repeat markers in current stocks. This identification of the heterozygous regions within C32 and SJD lines should permit rapid fixation of these remaining regions in future generations of inbreeding. In addition, we established levels of polymorphism between the inbred, C32 and SJD, strains and three other commonly used strains, the *AB, WIK, and Florida wild type (hereafter referred as EKK), with CA-repeat markers as well as SSCP polymorphisms. These data will maximize the use of these strains in mapping experiments.