Protein p4 represses phage phi 29 A2c promoter by interacting with the alpha subunit of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase

Different Modes of Transactivation of Bacteriophage Mu Late Promoters by Transcription Factor C

Transactivator protein C is required for the expression of bacteriophage Mu late genes from lys, I, P and mom promoters during lytic life cycle of the phage. The mechanism of transcription activation of mom gene by C protein is well understood. C activates transcription at Pmom by initial unwinding of the promoter DNA, thereby facilitating RNA polymerase (RNAP) recruitment. Subsequently, C interacts with the ß' subunit of RNAP to enhance promoter clearance. The mechanism by which C activates other late genes of the phage is not known. We carried out promoter-polymerase interaction studies with all the late gene promoters to determine the individual step of C mediated activation. Unlike at Pmom, at the other three promoters, RNAP recruitment and closed complex formation are not C dependent. Instead, the action of C at Plys, PI, and PP is during the isomerization from closed complex to open complex with no apparent effect at other steps of initiation pathway. The mechanism of transcription activation of mom and other late promoters by their common activator is different. This distinction in the mode of activation (promoter recruitment and escape versus isomerization) by the same activator at different promoters appears to be important for optimized expression of each of the late genes.

DNA looping-dependent autorepression of LEE1 P1 promoters by Ler in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Ler, a homolog of H-NS in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), plays a critical role in the expression of virulence genes encoded by the pathogenic island, locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE). Although Ler acts as an antisilencer of multiple LEE operons by alleviating H-NS-mediated silencing, it represses its own expression from two LEE1 P1 promoters, P1A and P1B, that are separated by 10 bp. Various in vitro biochemical methods were used in this study to elucidate the mechanism underlying transcription repression by Ler. Ler acts through two AATT motifs, centered at position -111.5 on the coding strand and at +65.5 on the noncoding strand, by simultaneously repressing P1A and P1B through DNA-looping. DNA-looping was visualized using atomic force microscopy. It is intriguing that an antisilencing protein represses transcription, not by steric exclusion of RNA polymerase, but by DNA-looping. We propose that the DNA-looping prevents further processing of open promoter complex (RPO) at these promoters during transcription initiation.

Gene silencing by H-NS from distal DNA site

In the modern concept of gene regulation, 'DNA looping' is the most common underlying mechanism in the interaction between RNA polymerase (RNAP) and transcription factors acting at a distance. This study demonstrates an additional mechanism by which DNA-bound proteins communicate with each other, by analysing the bacterial histone-like nucleoid-structuring protein (H-NS), a general transcriptional silencer. The LEE5 promoter (LEE5p) of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli was used as a model system to investigate the mechanism of H-NS-mediated transcription repression. We found that H-NS represses LEE5p by binding to a cluster of A tracks upstream of -114, followed by spreading to a site at the promoter through the oligomerization of H-NS molecules. At the promoter, the H-NS makes a specific contact with the carboxy terminal domain of the α subunit of RNAP, which prevents the processing of RNAP-promoter complexes into initiation-competent open promoter complexes, thereby regulating LEE5p from distance.

Operator sequence alters gene expression independently of transcription factor occupancy in bacteria

A canonical quantitative view of transcriptional regulation holds that the only role of operator sequence is to set the probability of transcription factor binding, with operator occupancy determining the level of gene expression. In this work, we test this idea by characterizing repression in vivo and the binding of RNA polymerase in vitro in experiments where operators of various sequences were placed either upstream or downstream from the promoter in Escherichia coli. Surprisingly, we find that operators with a weaker binding affinity can yield higher repression levels than stronger operators. Repressor bound to upstream operators modulates promoter escape, and the magnitude of this modulation is not correlated with the repressor-operator binding affinity. This suggests that operator sequences may modulate transcription by altering the nature of the interaction of the bound transcription factor with the transcriptional machinery, implying a new layer of sequence dependence that must be confronted in the quantitative understanding of gene expression.

Bacteriophage protein-protein interactions

Bacteriophages T7, λ, P22, and P2/P4 (from Escherichia coli), as well as ϕ29 (from Bacillus subtilis), are among the best-studied bacterial viruses. This chapter summarizes published protein interaction data of intraviral protein interactions, as well as known phage-host protein interactions of these phages retrieved from the literature. We also review the published results of comprehensive protein interaction analyses of Pneumococcus phages Dp-1 and Cp-1, as well as coliphages λ and T7. For example, the ≈55 proteins encoded by the T7 genome are connected by ≈43 interactions with another ≈15 between the phage and its host. The chapter compiles published interactions for the well-studied phages λ (33 intra-phage/22 phage-host), P22 (38/9), P2/P4 (14/3), and ϕ29 (20/2). We discuss whether different interaction patterns reflect different phage lifestyles or whether they may be artifacts of sampling. Phages that infect the same host can interact with different host target proteins, as exemplified by E. coli phage λ and T7. Despite decades of intensive investigation, only a fraction of these phage interactomes are known. Technical limitations and a lack of depth in many studies explain the gaps in our knowledge. Strategies to complete current interactome maps are described. Although limited space precludes detailed overviews of phage molecular biology, this compilation will allow future studies to put interaction data into the context of phage biology.

Real-time monitoring of a stepwise transcription reaction on a quartz-crystal microbalance

We monitored real-time DNA transcription by T7 RNAP using a 27-MHz DNA-immobilized quartz-crystal microbalance (QCM) in buffer solution to investigate the stepwise reaction of transcription. We designed a template double-stranded DNA that consisted of a T7 promoter, a stall position (15 bp downstream from the promoter), and a 73-bp transcription region. Based on the frequency (mass) changes of the template-immobilized QCM in response to the addition of T7 RNAP and monomers of NTP, we obtained the kinetic parameters of each step of the T7 RNAP reactions: the enzyme-binding rate (k(on)) to and the dissociation rate (k(off)) from the promoter, the proceeding rate (k(for)) from the promoter to the forward stall position, the polymerization rate (k(cat)) of RNA along DNA, and the release rate (k(r)) from the end of the template DNA. We found that k(cat) (120 s⁻¹) was extremely large compared with k(off) (0.014 s⁻¹), k(for) (0.062 s⁻¹), and k(r) (0.014 s⁻¹), revealing that the rate-limiting steps of T7 RNAP involve the binding to the promoter, the movement to the stall position, and the release from DNA. These kinetic parameters were compared with values for other DNA-binding enzymes.

Transcriptional repressor CopR acts by inhibiting RNA polymerase binding

CopR is a transcriptional repressor encoded by the broad-host-range streptococcal plasmid pIP501, which also replicates in Bacillus subtilis. It acts in concert with the antisense RNA, RNAIII, to control pIP501 replication. CopR represses transcription of the essential repR mRNA about 10- to 20-fold. In previous work, DNA binding and dimerization constants were determined and the motifs responsible localized. The C terminus of CopR was shown to be required for stability. Furthermore, SELEX of the copR operator revealed that in vivo evolution was for maximal binding affinity. Here, we elucidate the repression mechanism of CopR. Competition assays showed that CopR-operator complexes are 18-fold less stable than RNA polymerase (RNAP)-pII complexes. DNase I footprinting revealed that the binding sites for CopR and RNAP overlap. Gel-shift assays demonstrated that CopR and B. subtilis RNAP cannot bind simultaneously, but compete for binding at promoter pII. Due to its higher intracellular concentration CopR inhibits RNAP binding. Additionally, KMnO(4) footprinting experiments indicated that prevention of open complex formation at pII does not further contribute to the repression effect of CopR.

DNA bending and looping in the transcriptional control of bacteriophage phi29

Recent studies on the regulation of phage phi29 gene expression reveal new ways to accomplish the processes required for the orderly gene expression in prokaryotic systems. These studies revealed a novel DNA-binding domain in the phage main transcriptional regulator and the nature and dynamics of the multimeric DNA-protein complex responsible for the switch from early to late gene expression. This review describes the features of the regulatory mechanism that leads to the simultaneous activation and repression of transcription, and discusses it in the context of the role of the topological modification of the DNA carried out by two phage-encoded proteins working synergistically with the DNA.

The transcriptional repressor CcpN from Bacillus subtilis uses different repression mechanisms at different promoters

CcpN, a transcriptional repressor from Bacillus subtilis that is responsible for the carbon catabolite repression of three genes, has been characterized in detail in the past 4 years. However, nothing is known about the actual repression mechanism as yet. Here, we present a detailed study on how CcpN exerts its repression effect at its three known target promoters of the genes sr1, pckA, and gapB. Using gel shift assays under non-repressive and repressive conditions, we showed that CcpN and RNA polymerase can bind simultaneously and that CcpN does not prevent RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding to the promoter. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of CcpN on open complex formation and demonstrate that CcpN also does not act at this step of transcription initiation at the sr1 and pckA and presumably at the gapB promoter. Investigation of abortive transcript synthesis revealed that CcpN acts differently at the three promoters: At the sr1 and pckA promoter, promoter clearance is impeded by CcpN, whereas synthesis of abortive transcripts is repressed at the gapB promoter. Eventually, we demonstrated with Far Western blots and co-elution experiments that CcpN is able to interact with the RNAP alpha-subunit, which completes the picture of the requirements for the repressive action of CcpN. On the basis of the presented results, we propose a new working model for CcpN action.

Identification of ligands affecting the activity of the transcriptional repressor CcpN from Bacillus subtilis

Carbon catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis is mediated primarily by the major regulator CcpA. However, sugar-dependent repression of three genes, sr1 encoding a small nontranslated RNA and two genes coding for gluconeogenic enzymes, gapB and pckA, is carried out by the transcriptional repressor CcpN (control catabolite protein of gluconeogenic genes). It has previously been shown that ccpN is constitutively expressed, which leads to a constant occupation of all operators with CcpN. Since this would not allow for specific regulation, a ligand that modulates CcpN activity is required. In vitro transcription assays demonstrated that CcpN is able to specifically repress transcription to a small extent at the three mentioned promoters in the absence of an activating ligand. Upon testing of several ligands, including nucleotides and glycolysis intermediates, it could be shown that ATP is able to specifically enhance the repressing activity of CcpN, and this effect was more pronounced at a slightly acidic pH. Furthermore, ADP was found to specifically counteract the repressive effect of ATP. Circular dichroism measurements demonstrated a significant alteration of CcpN structure in the presence of ATP at acidic pH and in the presence of ADP. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that neither ATP nor ADP altered the affinity of CcpN for its operators. Therefore, we hypothesise that the effect of ligand-bound CcpN on the RNA polymerase might be due to a conformational switch that alters the interaction between the two proteins. Based on these results, a working model for CcpN action is discussed.

Transcriptional repressor CcpN from Bacillus subtilis compensates asymmetric contact distribution by cooperative binding

Carbon catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis is carried out mainly by the major regulator CcpA. In contrast, sugar-dependent repression of three genes, sr1 encoding a small untranslated RNA, and two genes, gapB and pckA, coding for gluconeogenic enzymes is mediated by the recently identified transcriptional repressor CcpN. Since previous DNase I footprinting yielded only basic information on the operator sequences of CcpN, chemical interference footprinting studies were performed for a precise contact mapping. Methylation interference, potassium permanganate and hydroxylamine footprinting were used to identify all contacted residues in both strands in the three operator sequences. Furthermore, ethylation interference experiments were performed to identify phosphate residues essential for CcpN binding. Here, we show that each operator has two binding sites for CcpN, one of which was always contacted more strongly than the other. The three sites that exhibited close contacts were very similar in sequence, with only a few slight variations, whereas the other three corresponding sites showed several deviations. Gel retardation assays with purified CcpN demonstrated that the differences in contact number and strength correlated well with significantly different K(D) values for the corresponding single binding sites. However, quantitative DNase I footprinting of whole operator sequences revealed cooperative binding of CcpN that, apparently, compensated the asymmetric contact distribution. Based on these data, possible consequences for the repression mechanism of CcpN are discussed.

The structure of phage phi29 transcription regulator p4-DNA complex reveals an N-hook motif for DNA

Protein p4 affects the transcriptional switch that divides bacteriophage phi29 infection in early and late phases. The synthesis of DNA replication proteins and p4 takes place in the early phase, while structural, morphogenesis, and lysis proteins are synthesized in the late phase. Transcriptional switch by p4 is achieved by activating the late promoter A3 and repressing the early promoters A2b and A2c. The crystal structure of p4 alone and in complex with a 41 bp DNA, including the A3 promoter binding site, helps us to understand how the phage cycle is controlled. Protein p4 has a unique alpha/beta fold that includes a DNA recognition motif consisting of two N-terminal beta turn substructures, or N-hooks, located at the tips of an elongated protein homodimer. The two N-hooks enter the major groove of the double helix, establishing base-specific contacts. A high DNA curvature allows p4 N-hooks to reach two major groove areas three helical turns apart, like a bow and its string.

The TyrR regulon

The TyrR protein of Escherichia coli can act both as a repressor and as an activator of transcription. It can interact with each of the three aromatic amino acids, with ATP and, under certain circumstances, with the C-terminal region of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase. TyrR protein is a dimer in solution but in the presence of tyrosine and ATP it self-associates to form a hexamer. Whereas TyrR dimers can, in the absence of any aromatic amino acids, bind to certain recognition sequences referred to as 'strong TyrR boxes', hexamers can bind to extended sequences including lower-affinity sites called 'weak TyrR boxes', some of which overlap the promoter. There is no single mechanism for repression, which in some cases involves exclusion of RNA polymerase from the promoter and in others, interference with the ability of bound RNA polymerase to form open complexes or to exit the promoter. When bound to a site upstream of certain promoters, TyrR protein in the presence of phenylalanine, tyrosine or tryptophan can interact with the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase to activate transcription. In one unusual case, activation of a non-productive promoter is used to repress transcription from a promoter on the opposite strand. Regulation of individual transcription units within the regulon reflects their physiological function and is determined by the position and nature of the recognition sites (TyrR boxes) associated with each of the promoters. The intracellular levels of the various forms of the TyrR protein are also postulated to be of critical importance in determining regulatory outcomes. TyrR protein remains a paradigm for a regulator that is able to interact with multiple cofactors and exert a range of regulatory effects by forming different oligomers on DNA and making contact with other proteins. A recent analysis identifying putative TyrR boxes in the E. coli genome raises the possibility that the TyrR regulon may extend beyond the well-characterized transcription units described in this review.

Evidence that Bacillus catabolite control protein CcpA interacts with RNA polymerase to inhibit transcription

Summary Bacilluscatabolite control protein (CcpA) mediates carbon catabolite repression (CCR) by controlling expression of catabolite responsive (CR) genes or operons through interaction with catabolite responsive elements (cres) located within or outside of CR promoters. Here, we investigated how CcpA inhibits the transcription of CR promoters in vitro. CcpA has different affinities for different cres, but this does not correlate with its ability to inhibit transcription. In the amyE promoter, which overlaps a CcpA binding site (amyE cre centred at +4.5), CcpA does not prevent RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding to the promoter; it may even interact with RNAP. Inserting non-integral turns of helix (1.5 and 2.5) between the amyE promoter (-10 hexamer) and the amyE cre relieved CCR of amyE expression. In the xyl operon, despite the downstream location of its cre (a major cre centred at +130.5), CcpA blocked transcription initiation, not elongation (roadblock) at the site of the cre. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that CcpA requires interactions with RNAP to inhibit transcription.

Analysis in vitro and in vivo of the transcriptional regulator CrgA of Neisseria meningitidis upon contact with target cells

Contact between CrgA, a LysR-like regulatory protein in Neisseria meningitidis, and DNA is involved in the repression of several bacterial genes upon contact with epithelial cells. We used a defined in vitro system containing crgA promoter, purified RNA polymerase (RNAP) and purified CrgA protein to demonstrate that CrgA was directly responsible for this transcriptional repression. Interaction between the C-terminal domain of CrgA and the RNAP led to the production of short abortive transcripts, suggesting that CrgA may act by preventing RNAP from clearing the promoter. We probed the regulation by CrgA of its own production by analysing CrgA-DNA contacts during cell-bacteria interaction by assaying in vivo protection against dimethyl sulphate (DMS) methylation. Comparison of DMS footprints in vitro and in vivo suggested that CrgA repressed transcription through specific base contacts, probably in the major groove of the DNA double helix, resulting in DNA looping. Upon contact with target cells, CrgA was released from the DNA, allowing transcription of the target gene to proceed to elongation and facilitating tight control of the expression of genes regulated by CrgA.

lacP1 promoter with an extended -10 motif. Pleiotropic effects of cyclic AMP protein at different steps of transcription initiation

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), which activates transcription from the wild-type lacP1 promoter and most of its mutants, represses productive RNA synthesis from a lacP1 promoter variant that contains an extended -10 element, although CRP enhances RNA polymerase binding as well as open complex formation in both promoters. Moreover, abortive RNA synthesis, which is already higher in the extended -10 variant compared with the parent promoter, was further enhanced by CRP. These results, together with the observed decrease in productive RNA synthesis, indicate that CRP, while facilitating the earlier steps of initiation, inhibits transcription from the extended -10 lacP1 by hindering promoter clearance. We propose that CRP decreases energetic barriers to RNA polymerase binding, isomerization, and abortive RNA synthesis but stabilizes the abortive RNA initiating complex, which results in increasing the activation energy of the transition state before the elongation complex. The results demonstrate for the first time that a DNA-binding regulatory protein acts as an activator or a repressor in different steps of the transcription initiation pathway because of the energetic differences of the intermediate complex in the same promoter.

Mode of action of the TyrR protein: repression and activation of the tyrP promoter of Escherichia coli

The tyrP gene of Escherichia coli encodes a tyrosine specific transporter. Its synthesis is repressed by tyrosine but is activated by phenylalanine and to a lesser extent by tryptophan. Both of these effects are mediated by the TyrR protein when it binds to one or both of its cognate binding sites (TyrR boxes) which encompass nucleotides -30 to -75. Activation in the presence of phenylalanine or tryptophan involves a dimer binding to the upstream box and interacting with the alpha subunit (alphaCTD) of RNA polymerase (RNAP). Repression in the presence of tyrosine involves a hexamer binding to both TyrR boxes. The molecular basis for this repression has been studied in vitro. Whereas initial gel shift experiments fail to show the exclusion of RNAP from the promoter region when TyrR hexamer is bound, a DNase I analysis of slices from the gel shows that in the presence of TyrR, RNAP now binds to a previously unrecognized upstream promoter. Although this upstream promoter is bound strongly by RNAP and forms an open complex on linear DNA templates, it fails to form an open complex on supercoiled templates in vitro and is unable to initiate transcription in vivo. A subsequent gel shift assay using a tyrP fragment which eliminates the upstream RNAP binding site confirms conclusively that, in the presence of tyrosine and ATP, the TyrR protein prevents RNAP from binding to the tyrP promoter. In vitro studies have also been carried out in the presence of TyrR protein and phenylalanine. Binding of TyrR protein to the upstream TyrR box in the presence of phenylalanine is shown to increase the affinity of RNAP for the promoter and stimulate open complex formation at the -10 region of the tyrP promoter. This observation coupled with the results from mutational analysis supports the proposal that TyrR-phenylalanine activates tyrP transcription by stimulating the onset of open complex formation.

Relevance of UP elements for three strong Bacillus subtilis phage phi29 promoters

Various Escherichia coli promoters contain, in addition to the classical -35 and -10 hexamers, a third recognition element, named the UP element. Located upstream of the -35 box, UP elements stimulate promoter activity by forming a docking site for the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD). Accumulating genetic, biochemical and structural information has provided a detailed picture on the molecular mechanism underlying UP element-dependent promoter stimulation in E.coli. However, far less is known about functional UP elements of Bacillus subtilis promoters. Here we analyse the strong early sigma(A)-RNA polymerase-dependent promoters C2, A2c and A2b of the lytic B.subtilis phage phi29. We demonstrate that the phage promoters contain functional UP elements although their contribution to promoter strength is very different. Moreover, we show that the UP element of the A2b promoter, being critical for its activity, is located further upstream of the -35 box than most E.coli UP elements. The importance of the UP elements for the phage promoters and how they relate to other UP elements are discussed.

Changes in conserved region 3 of Escherichia coli sigma 70 reduce abortive transcription and enhance promoter escape

Mutations within the Escherichia coli rpoD gene encoding amino acid substitutions in conserved region 3 of the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase restore normal stress responsiveness to strains devoid of the stress alarmone, guanosine-3',5'-(bis)pyrophosphate (ppGpp). The presence of a mutant protein, either sigma(70)(P504L) or sigma(70)(S506F), suppresses the physiological defects in strains devoid of ppGpp. In vitro, when reconstituted into RNA polymerase holoenzyme, these sigma mutants confer unique transcriptional properties, namely they reduce the probabilities of forming abortive RNAs. Here we investigated the behavior of these mutant enzymes during transcription of the highly abortive cellular promoter, gal P2. No differences between mutant and wild-type enzymes were observed prior to and including open complex formation. Remarkably, the mutant enzymes produced drastically reduced levels of gal P2 abortive RNAs and increased production of full-length gal P2 RNAs relative to the wild-type enzyme, leading to greatly reduced ratios of abortive to productive RNAs. These results are attributed mainly to a decreased formation of unproductive initial transcribing complexes with the mutant polymerases and increased rates of promoter escape. Altered transcription properties of these mutant polymerases arise from an alternative structure of the sigma(70) region 3.2 segment that permits efficient positioning of the nascent RNA into the RNA exit channel displacing sigma and facilitating sigma release.

Two different modes of transcription repression of the Escherichia coli acetate operon by IclR

IclR is a repressor for the Escherichia coli aceBAK operon, which encodes isocitrate lyase (aceB), malate synthase (aceA) and isocitrate dehydroge-nase kinase/phosphorylase (aceK) in the glyoxylate bypass. IclR also represses the expression of iclR in an autogenous manner. DNase I footprinting and in vitro transcription assays indicated that IclR binds to an IclR box (-21 to +14), which overlaps the iclR promoter and thus competes with the RNA polymerase for DNA binding, leading to transcription repression. In the case of the aceBAK operon, IclR binds to IclR box II between -52 and -19 of the aceB promoter and interferes with binding of the RNA polymerase to this promoter. A secondary IclR binding site (IclR box I) was identified between -125 and -99 of the aceB promoter. IclR binds to this IclR box I even after formation of the aceB promoter open complex and, moreover, induces disassembly of the open complex, leading to repression of aceB transcription. In parallel, the location of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD) on DNA is shifted close to the IclR box I, indicating that direct interaction between the alphaCTD and the IclR box I-associated IclR caused the repression.

The phi29 transcriptional regulator contacts the nucleoid protein p6 to organize a repression complex

The nucleoid protein p6 of Bacillus subtilis phage phi29 binds to DNA, recognizing a structural feature rather than a specific sequence. Upon binding to the viral DNA ends, p6 generates an extended nucleoprotein complex that activates the initiation of phi29 DNA replication. Protein p6 also participates in transcription regulation, repressing the early C2 promoter and assisting the viral regulatory protein p4 in controlling the switch from early to late transcription. Proteins p6 and p4 bind cooperatively to an approximately 200 bp DNA region located between the late A3 and the early A2c promoters, generating an extended nucleoprotein complex that helps to repress the early A2c promoter and to activate the late A3 promoter. We show that stable assembly of this complex requires interaction between protein p6 and the C-terminus of protein p4. Therefore, at this DNA region, stable polymerization of protein p6 relies on p4-specified signals in addition to the structural features of the DNA. Protein p4 would define the phase and boundaries of the p6-DNA complex.

Molecular analysis of tyrosine-and phenylalanine-mediated repression of the tyrB promoter by the TyrR protein of Escherichia coli

The mechanism of repression of the tyrB promoter by TyrR protein has been studied in vivo and in vitro. In tyrR+ strains, transcription of tyrB is repressed by either tyrosine or phenylalanine. Both of the TyrR binding sites (strong and weak TyrR boxes) lie downstream of the tyrB transcription start site and are required for tyrosine- or phenylalanine-mediated repression. Our results establish that the binding of the TyrR protein to the weak box, induced by cofactor tyrosine or phenylalanine, is critical for repression to occur. Neither the binding of the TyrR protein dimer formed in the presence of phenylalanine, nor the binding of the hexamer formed in the presence of tyrosine, blocks the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. Instead, open complex formation is inhibited in the presence of tyrosine whereas a step(s) following open complex formation is inhibited in the presence of phenylalanine. Moving the TyrR boxes 3 bp or more further away from the promoter affects tyrosine-mediated repression without affecting phenylalanine-mediated repression which remains unaltered until 6 bp are inserted between the TyrR boxes and the promoter. Analysis of deletion and insertion mutants fails to reveal any face of the helix specificity for either tyrosine- or phenylalanine-mediated repression.

Structural basis for H-NS-mediated trapping of RNA polymerase in the open initiation complex at the rrnB P1

The Escherichia coli H-NS protein is a nucleoid-associated protein involved in both transcription regulation and DNA compaction. Each of these processes involves H-NS-mediated bridge formation between adjacent DNA helices. With respect to transcription regulation, preferential binding sites in the promoter regions of different genes have been reported, and generally these regions are curved. Often H-NS binding sites overlap with promoter core regions or with binding sites of other regulatory factors. Not in all cases, however, transcriptional repression is the result of preferential binding by H-NS to promoter regions leading to occlusion of the RNA polymerase. In the case of the rrnB P1, H-NS actually stimulates open complex formation by forming a ternary RNAP.H-NS.DNA complex, while simultaneously stabilizing it to such an extent that promoter clearance cannot occur. To define the mechanism by which H-NS interferes at this step in the initiation pathway, the architecture of the RNAP.H-NS.DNA complex was analyzed by scanning force microscopy (SFM). The SFM images show that the DNA flanking the RNA polymerase in open initiation complexes is bridged by H-NS. On the basis of these data, we present a model for the specific repression of transcription initiation at the rrnB P1 by H-NS.

Two regions of GerE required for promoter activation in Bacillus subtilis

GerE from Bacillus subtilis is the smallest member of the LuxR-FixJ family of transcription activators. Its 74-amino-acid sequence is similar over its entire length to the DNA binding domain of this protein family, including a putative helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif. In this report, we sought to define regions of GerE involved in promoter activation. We examined the effects of single alanine substitutions at 19 positions that were predicted by the crystal structure of GerE to be located on its surface. A single substitution of alanine for the phenylalanine at position 6 of GerE (F6A) resulted in decreased transcription in vivo and in vitro from the GerE-dependent cotC promoter. However, the F6A substitution had little effect on transcription from the GerE-dependent cotX promoter. In contrast, a single alanine substitution for the leucine at position 67 (L67A) reduced transcription from the cotX promoter, but not from the cotC promoter. The results of DNase I protection assays and in vitro transcription reactions lead us to suggest that the F6A and L67A substitutions define two regions of GerE, activation region 1 (AR1) and AR2, that are required for activation of the cotC and cotX promoters, respectively. A comparison of our results with those from studies of MalT and BvgA indicated that other members of the LuxR-FixJ family may use more than one surface to interact with RNA polymerase during promoter activation.

Mechanism for the switch of phi29 DNA early to late transcription by regulatory protein p4 and histone-like protein p6

Bacteriophage phi29 gene expression takes place from four major promoters, three of them (A2b, A2c and A3) clustered within 219 bp at a central region of the genome. Transcription regulation of these promoters involves both a highly specific DNA-binding protein (p4) and a low specificity DNA-binding protein (p6) functionally related to prokaryotic histone-like proteins. Protein p6 forms extended oligomeric arrays along the phage DNA. In contrast, protein p4 binds specifically upstream of late promoter A3 and early promoter A2c. We have analysed the concomitant binding of p6 and p4 and found that the proteins cooperate with each other in the binding to the central region of the genome, resulting in a ternary p4-p6-DNA complex that affects local DNA topology. Through this complex, protein p6 exerts a direct role in the repression of promoter A2c, impeding unwinding of the DNA strands needed for open complex formation. In contrast, protein p6 functions by reinforcing the positioning of protein p4 in the repression of promoter A2b and activation of promoter A3, thereby facilitating p4-mediated transcription regulation.

Repression of deoP2 in Escherichia coli by CytR: conversion of a transcription activator into a repressor

In the deoP2 promoter of Escherichia coli, a transcription activator, cAMP-CRP, binds at two sites, centered at -41.5 and -93.5 from the start site of transcription, while a repressor, CytR, binds to a space between the two cAMP-CRP complexes. The mechanisms for the cAMP-CRP-mediated transcription activation and CytR-mediated transcription repression were investigated in vitro using purified components. We classified the deoP2 promoter as a class II cAMP-CRP-dependent promoter, primarily by the action of cAMP-CRP at the downstream site. Interestingly, we also found that deoP2 carries an "UP-element" immediately upstream of the downstream cAMP-CRP site. The UP-element overlaps with the DNA site for CytR. However, it was observed that CytR functions with the RNA polymerase devoid of the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit as well as with intact RNA polymerase. The mechanism of repression by CytR proposed in this study is that the cAMP-CRP bound at -41.5 undergoes an allosteric change upon direct interaction with CytR such that it no longer maintains a productive interaction with the N-terminal domain of alpha, but instead acts as a repressor to interfere with RNA polymerase acting on deoP2.

Phi29 family of phages

Continuous research spanning more than three decades has made the Bacillus bacteriophage phi29 a paradigm for several molecular mechanisms of general biological processes, such as DNA replication, regulation of transcription, phage morphogenesis, and phage DNA packaging. The genome of bacteriophage phi29 consists of a linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), which has a terminal protein (TP) covalently linked to its 5' ends. Initiation of DNA replication, carried out by a protein-primed mechanism, has been studied in detail and is considered to be a model system for the protein-primed DNA replication that is also used by most other linear genomes with a TP linked to their DNA ends, such as other phages, linear plasmids, and adenoviruses. In addition to a continuing progress in unraveling the initiation of DNA replication mechanism and the role of various proteins involved in this process, major advances have been made during the last few years, especially in our understanding of transcription regulation, the head-tail connector protein, and DNA packaging. Recent progress in all these topics is reviewed. In addition to phi29, the genomes of several other Bacillus phages consist of a linear dsDNA with a TP molecule attached to their 5' ends. These phi29-like phages can be divided into three groups. The first group includes, in addition to phi29, phages PZA, phi15, and BS32. The second group comprises B103, Nf, and M2Y, and the third group contains GA-1 as its sole member. Whereas the DNA sequences of the complete genomes of phi29 (group I) and B103 (group II) are known, only parts of the genome of GA-1 (group III) were sequenced. We have determined the complete DNA sequence of the GA-1 genome, which allowed analysis of differences and homologies between the three groups of phi29-like phages, which is included in this review.

Phi29 family of phages

Continuous research spanning more than three decades has made the Bacillus bacteriophage phi29 a paradigm for several molecular mechanisms of general biological processes, such as DNA replication, regulation of transcription, phage morphogenesis, and phage DNA packaging. The genome of bacteriophage phi29 consists of a linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), which has a terminal protein (TP) covalently linked to its 5' ends. Initiation of DNA replication, carried out by a protein-primed mechanism, has been studied in detail and is considered to be a model system for the protein-primed DNA replication that is also used by most other linear genomes with a TP linked to their DNA ends, such as other phages, linear plasmids, and adenoviruses. In addition to a continuing progress in unraveling the initiation of DNA replication mechanism and the role of various proteins involved in this process, major advances have been made during the last few years, especially in our understanding of transcription regulation, the head-tail connector protein, and DNA packaging. Recent progress in all these topics is reviewed. In addition to phi29, the genomes of several other Bacillus phages consist of a linear dsDNA with a TP molecule attached to their 5' ends. These phi29-like phages can be divided into three groups. The first group includes, in addition to phi29, phages PZA, phi15, and BS32. The second group comprises B103, Nf, and M2Y, and the third group contains GA-1 as its sole member. Whereas the DNA sequences of the complete genomes of phi29 (group I) and B103 (group II) are known, only parts of the genome of GA-1 (group III) were sequenced. We have determined the complete DNA sequence of the GA-1 genome, which allowed analysis of differences and homologies between the three groups of phi29-like phages, which is included in this review.

Mechanisms of transcriptional repression

Transcriptional repressors are usually viewed as proteins that bind to promoters in a way that impedes subsequent binding of RNA polymerase. Although this repression mechanism is found at several promoters, there is a growing list of repressors that inhibit transcription initiation in other ways. For example, several repressors allow the simultaneous binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter, but interfere with subsequent events of the initiation process, eventually inhibiting transcription initiation. The recent increase in the number of repressors for which the repression mechanism has been characterized in detail has shown an amazing variety of strategies to repress transcription initiation. It is not surprising to find that the repression mechanism used is usually exquisitely adapted to the characteristics of the promoter and of the repressor involved.

A Mutation in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit that destabilizes the open complexes formed at the phage phi 29 late A3 promoter

Regulatory protein p4 from Bacillus subtilis phage phi29 activates the viral late A3 promoter mainly by stabilizing the binding of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to it as a closed complex. This requires an interaction between protein p4 residue Arg120 and the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the RNAP alpha subunit. Several acidic residues of the alpha-CTD, considered as plausible targets for p4 residue Arg120, were individually changed into alanine. In addition, a truncated alpha subunit lacking the last four residues, two of which are acidic, was obtained. The modified alpha subunits were purified and reconstituted into RNAP holoenzyme in vitro. Protein p4 was found to be unable to activate the late A3 promoter when residue Glu297 of the alpha subunit was changed to Ala, a modification that did not impair transcription from several other promoters. Interestingly, protein p4 could stabilize the modified RNAP at the A3 promoter as a closed complex, although the open complexes formed were unstable and did not proceed to elongation complexes. Our results indicate that the change of the alpha residue Glu297 into Ala destabilizes the open complexes formed at this promoter, but not at other promoters. Considered in the context of earlier findings indicating that the RNAP alpha-CTD may participate in the transition from closed to intermediate complexes at some other promoters, the new results expand and clarify our view of its role in transcription initiation.

Mechanism of repression of the aroP P2 promoter by the TyrR protein of Escherichia coli

Previously, we have shown that expression of the Escherichia coli aroP P2 promoter is partially repressed by the TyrR protein alone and strongly repressed by the TyrR protein in the presence of the coeffector tyrosine or phenylalanine (P. Wang, J. Yang, and A. J. Pittard, J. Bacteriol. 179:4206-4212, 1997). Here we present in vitro results showing that the TyrR protein and RNA polymerase can bind simultaneously to the aroP P2 promoter. In the presence of tyrosine, the TyrR protein inhibits open complex formation at the P2 promoter, whereas in the absence of any coeffector or in the presence of phenylalanine, the TyrR protein inhibits a step(s) following the formation of open complexes. We also present mutational evidence which implicates the N-terminal domain of the TyrR protein in the repression of P2 expression. The TyrR binding site of aroP, which includes one weak and one strong TyrR box, is located 5 bp downstream of the transcription start site of P2. Results from a mutational analysis show that the strong box (which is located more closely to the P2 promoter), but not the weak box, plays a critical role in P2 repression.

Functional interactions between a phage histone-like protein and a transcriptional factor in regulation of phi29 early-late transcriptional switch

Protein p6 is a nonspecific DNA-binding protein occurring in high abundance in phage phi29-infected cells. Here, we demonstrate a novel role for this versatile histone-like protein: its involvement in regulating the viral switch between early and late transcription. p6 performs this role by exhibiting a reciprocal functional interaction with the regulatory protein p4, also phage encoded, which is required for repression of the early A2b and A2c promoters and activation of the late A3 promoter. On the one hand, p6 promotes p4-mediated repression of the A2b promoter and activation of the A3 promoter by enhancing binding of p4 to its recognition site at PA3; on the other, p4 promotes p6-mediated repression of the A2c promoter by favoring the formation of a stable p6-nucleoprotein complex that interferes with RNA polymerase binding to PA2c. We propose that the observed interplay between proteins p6 and p4 is based on their DNA architectural properties.

Effect of mutations in the "extended -10" motif of three Bacillus subtilis sigmaA-RNA polymerase-dependent promoters

The "extended -10" motif described originally in Escherichia coli promoters occurs frequently in other bacterial promoters. Most Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage o29 promoters contain this motif. To analyse the influence of the motif on sigmaA-RNA polymerase transcription, the 5'-TG-3' dinucleotide was changed to 5'-AC-3' in three o29 promoters. This change impaired RNA polymerase binding to the promoters; the yields of closed and open complexes were reduced independently of other differences inherent to each promoter. The mutation abolished transcription in vitro from a promoter lacking the consensus sequence at the -35 hexamer. In contrast, at other promoters with a -35 consensus sequence, the yield of run off transcription was not reduced by the mutation. Indeed an apparent interference phenomenon at high polymerase/DNA ratios was relieved. These results indicate that the extended -10 motif provides contact points for sigmaA-RNA polymerase with a role restricted to the first steps of transcription.

GalR-mediated repression and activation of hybrid lacUV5 promoter: differential contacts with RNA polymerase

The GalR repressor regulates expression of genes of the gal regulon in Escherichia coli. We studied the regulatory effect of GalR in vitro on a heterologous promoter, lacUV5, by placing the GalR-binding site, OE, at different locations upstream of this promoter. Despite the fact that the lacUV5 promoter is transcribed efficiently by RNA polymerase (RNP) alone, GalR modulated transcription from many of the PlacUV5 variants. Depending on the location of OE and the neighboring DNA sequence, GalR repressed, activated or had no effect on the promoter. Both repression and activation involved formation of GalR-RNP-DNA ternary complexes and required an intact c-domain of the alpha subunit of the holoenzyme. These results support the differential contact model of a regulator action, in which a regulator differentially binds to, and lowers the energy of, intermediates of transcription initiation either to hinder or to facilitate a step of initiation. The nature of the contacts depends upon the context, i.e. the geometry of the ternary complex. The observed repression and activation effect of GalR on a heterologous promoter also underscores the point that a regulator is not a dedicated protein for repression or for activation.

Binding of phage phi29 protein p4 to the early A2c promoter: recruitment of a repressor by the RNA polymerase

Regulatory protein p4 from Bacillus subtilis phage Phi29 represses the early A2c promoter by binding upstream from RNA polymerase and interacting with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit. This interaction stabilizes the RNA polymerase at the promoter in such a way that promoter clearance is prevented. Here, the binding of protein p4 to the A2c promoter has been studied. In the absence of RNA polymerase, protein p4 was found to bind with low affinity to a site centered at position -39 relative to the transcription start site. When RNA polymerase was present, protein p4 was displaced from this site and bound instead to a different target centered at position -71. Stable binding to this site requires the interaction of protein p4 with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha-subunit. Both sites contain sequences resembling the well-characterized p4 binding site present at the late A3 promoter, to which p4 binds with high affinity. A mutational analysis revealed that the site at -71 is critical for a stable interaction between protein p4 and RNA polymerase, and for efficient repression, whereas mutation of the site at -39 had only a small effect on repression efficiency. Therefore, RNA polymerase plays an active role in the repression mechanism by stabilizing the repressor at the promoter, generating a nucleoprotein complex that is too stable to allow promoter clearance.

Transcriptional activation of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIG promoter by the response regulator Spo0A is independent of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

In vitro transcription from the spoIIG promoter by Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase reconstituted with wild-type alpha subunits and with C-terminal deletion mutants of the alpha subunit was equally stimulated by the response regulator Spo0A. Some differences in the structure of open complexes formed by RNA polymerase containing alpha subunit mutants were noted, although the wild-type and mutant polymerases appeared to use the same initiation mechanism.

NADP, corepressor for the Bacillus catabolite control protein CcpA

Expression of the alpha-amylase gene (amyE) of Bacillus subtilis is subject to CcpA (catabolite control protein A)-mediated catabolite repression, a global regulatory mechanism in Bacillus and other Gram-positive bacteria. To determine effectors of CcpA, we tested the ability of glycolytic metabolites, nucleotides, and cofactors to affect CcpA binding to the amyE operator, amyO. Those that stimulated the DNA-binding affinity of CcpA were tested for their effect on transcription. HPr-P (Ser-46), proposed as an effector of CcpA, also was tested. In DNase I footprint assays, the affinity of CcpA for amyO was stimulated 2-fold by fructose-1,6-diphosphate (FDP), 1.5-fold by oxidized or reduced forms of NADP, and 10-fold by HPr-P (Ser-46). However, the triple combinations, CcpA/NADP/HPr-P (Ser-46) and CcpA/FDP/HPr-P (Ser-46) synergistically stimulated DNA-binding affinity by 120- and 300-fold, respectively. NADP added to CcpA specifically stimulated transcription inhibition of the amyE promoter by 120-fold. CcpA combined with HPr (Ser-46) inhibited transcription from the amyE promoter, but it also inhibited several control promoters. FDP did not stimulate transcription inhibition by CcpA nor did the triple combinations. The finding that NADP had little effect on CcpA DNA binding but increased the ability of CcpA to inhibit transcription suggests that catabolite repression is not simply caused by CcpA binding amyO but rather a result of interactions with the transcription machinery enhanced by NADP.

Transcription activation and repression by interaction of a regulator with the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase: the model of phage phi 29 protein p4

Regulatory protein p4, encoded by Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29, has proved to be a very useful model to analyze the molecular mechanisms of transcription regulation. Protein p4 modulates the transcription of phage phi 29 genome by activating the late A3 promoter (PA3) and simultaneously repressing the two main early promoters, A2b and A2c (or PA2b and PA2c). This review describes in detail the regulatory mechanism leading to activation or repression, and discusses them in the context of the recent findings on the role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in transcription regulation. Activation of PA3 implies the p4-mediated stabilization of RNA polymerase at the promoter as a closed complex. Repression of the early A2b promoter occurs by binding of protein p4 to a site that partially overlaps the -35 consensus region of the promoter, therefore preventing the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. Repression of the A2c promoter, located 96 bp downstream from PA2b, occurs by a different mechanism that implies the simultaneous binding of protein p4 and RNA polymerase to the promoter in such a way that promoter clearance is inhibited. Interestingly, activation of PA3 and repression of PA2c require an interaction between protein p4 and RNA polymerase, and in both cases this interaction occurs between the same surface of protein p4 and the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase, which provides new insights into how a protein can activate or repress transcription by subtle variations in the protein-DNA complexes formed at promoters.

Substitution of the C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit by that from Bacillus subtilis makes the enzyme responsive to a Bacillus subtilis transcriptional activator

Regulatory protein p4 of Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29 activates transcription from the viral late A3 promoter by interacting with the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the B. subtilis RNA polymerase alpha subunit, thereby stabilizing the holoenzyme at the promoter. Protein p4 does not interact with the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and cannot activate transcription with this enzyme. We have constructed a chimerical alpha subunit containing the N-terminal domain of the E. coli alpha subunit and the CTD of the B. subtilis alpha subunit. Reconstitution of RNA polymerases containing this chimerical alpha subunit, the E. coli beta and beta' subunits, and the vegetative sigma factor from either E. coli (sigma 70) or B. subtilis (sigma A), generated hybrid enzymes that were responsive to protein p4 and efficiently supported activation at the A3 promoter. Protein p4 activated transcription with the chimerical enzymes through the same activation surface used with B. subtilis RNA polymerase. Therefore, the B. subtilis alpha-CTD allowed activation by p4 even when the rest of the RNA polymerase subunits belonged to E. coli, a distantly related bacterium. These results strongly suggest that protein p4 works essentially by serving as an anchor that stabilizes RNA polymerase at the promoter.

Transcription activation or repression by phage psi 29 protein p4 depends on the strength of the RNA polymerase-promoter interactions

Phage psi 29 protein p4 activates the late A3 promoter and represses the early A2c promoter, in both cases by binding upstream from RNA polymerase (RNAP) and interacting with the C-terminal domain of the RNAP alpha subunit. To investigate how this interaction leads to activation at PA3 and to repression at PA2c, mutant promoters were constructed. We show that the position of protein p4 relative to that of RNAP, which is different at each promoter, does not dictate the outcome of the interaction. Rather, in the absence of a-35 consensus box for sigma A-RNAP activation was observed, while in its presence repression occurred. The results support the view that stabilization of RNAP at the promoter over a threshold level leads to repression.

Repression and activation of promoter-bound RNA polymerase activity by Gal repressor

By binding to the DNA site OE at position -60.5 in the gal operon, the GalR protein activates transcription from the P2 promoter located on the opposite face of DNA (position -5) and represses transcription from the P1 promoter located on the same face (position +1). GalR increases RNA polymerase binding at P2 and inhibits isomerization at P1 by forming a GalR-DNA-RNA polymerase ternary complex in each case. The specific effect of GalR at one promoter is independent of the presence of the other promoter. The enhancement or repression is also not the intrinsic property of a promoter; the regulation can be reversed by switching the angular orientation of the promoters relative to OE. Both enhancement and repression appear to require the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and GalR and/or the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and DNA in the ternary complexes. We have discussed how GalR might exert opposite effects in the steps involved in the formation of the open complex from free RNA polymerase and DNA.

Dual targets of a transcriptional activator that tracks on DNA

The sliding clamp of the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase, gp45, is also the proximal effector for activation of transcription of T4 late genes. We have identified the phage T4-encoded sigma factor gp55 and the co-activator gp33 as targets of gp45 in promoter complexes, and have shown that a conserved carboxy-terminal amino acid sequence of gp55 and gp33 is required for interaction with gp45. The respective contribution of each target-gp45 interaction to activation of transcription has been assessed by measuring promoter opening rates. The opening rate supported by interaction with both targets is far greater than the arithmetical sum of the separate contributions of each target, implying a synergistic activation of transcription through at least two separate interactions of the trimeric gp45.

Activation of prokaryotic transcription through arbitrary protein-protein contacts

Many transcriptional activators in prokaryotes are known to bind near a promoter and contact RNA polymerase, but it is not clear whether a protein-protein contact between an activator and RNA polymerase is enough to activate gene transcription. Here we show that contact between a DNA-bound protein and a heterologous protein domain fused to RNA polymerase can elicit transcriptional activation; moreover, the strength of this engineered protein-protein interaction determines the amount of gene activation. Our results indicate that an arbitrary interaction between a DNA-bound protein and RNA polymerase can activate transcription. We also find that when the DNA-bound 'activator' makes contact with two different components of the polymerase, the effect of these two interactions on transcription is synergistic.

Interaction of Gal repressor with inducer and operator: induction of gal transcription from repressor-bound DNA

Gal repressor inhibits transcription from the gal promoter (P1) when it binds to the cognate operator (O(E)). The repression is relieved by the presence of the inducer D-galactose. Compared with its interaction with free repressor, D-galactose binds to the repressor-operator complex with 10-fold reduced affinity as determined by fluorescence enhancement measurements. Thermodynamic analysis and fluorescence anisotropy showed that the stability of the repressor-operator complex is reduced by only 7-fold by the presence of the inducer in the complex. The formation of the inducer-repressor-operator ternary complex has been confirmed by CD spectral analysis. Fluorescence spectroscopy and energy transfer experiments suggest that individual allosteric effects of the two ligands, inducer and operator, on Gal repressor are responsible for the slightly weakened stability of the ternary complex compared with the stability of the inducer-repressor and repressor-operator complexes. In vitro transcription results demonstrated full derepression of transcription of the P1 promoter under conditions in which the concentrations of the inducer-repressor binary complex are severalfold higher than the dissociation constant of the inducer-repressor-operator ternary complex into inducer-repressor and free DNA. These results strongly suggest that the inducer binding to the repressor-operator complex does not lead to dissociation of the repressor from the operator during transcription induction. Because Gal repressor inhibits transcription by modulating the alpha subunit of the P1-bound RNA polymerase, we conclude that the inducer binding to the operator-bound repressor only allosterically relieves the inhibitory effect of repressor on RNA polymerase without dissociating the repressor from DNA.

Basic mechanisms of transcript elongation and its regulation

Ternary complexes of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase with its DNA template and nascent transcript are central intermediates in transcription. In recent years, several unusual biochemical reactions have been discovered that affect the progression of RNA polymerase in ternary complexes through various transcription units. These reactions can be signaled intrinsically, by nucleic acid sequences and the RNA polymerase, or extrinsically, by protein or other regulatory factors. These factors can affect any of these processes, including promoter proximal and promoter distal pausing in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and therefore play a central role in regulation of gene expression. In eukaryotic systems, at least two of these factors appear to be related to cellular transformation and human cancers. New models for the structure of ternary complexes, and for the mechanism by which they move along DNA, provide plausible explanations for novel biochemical reactions that have been observed. These models predict that RNA polymerase moves along DNA without the constant possibility of dissociation and consequent termination. A further prediction of these models is that the polymerase can move in a discontinuous or inchworm-like manner. Many direct predictions of these models have been confirmed. However, one feature of RNA chain elongation not predicted by the model is that the DNA sequence can determine whether the enzyme moves discontinuously or monotonically. In at least two cases, the encounter between the RNA polymerase and a DNA block to elongation appears to specifically induce a discontinuous mode of synthesis. These findings provide important new insights into the RNA chain elongation process and offer the prospect of understanding many significant biological regulatory systems at the molecular level.