Widespread use of the glu-tRNAGln transamidation pathway among bacteria. A member of the alpha purple bacteria lacks glutaminyl-trna synthetase

Evolution and variation in amide aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis

The amide proteogenic amino acids, asparagine and glutamine, are two of the twenty amino acids used in translation by all known life. The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for asparagine and glutamine, asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl tRNA synthetase, evolved after the split in the last universal common ancestor of modern organisms. Before that split, life used two-step indirect pathways to synthesize asparagine and glutamine on their cognate tRNAs to form the aminoacyl-tRNA used in translation. These two-step pathways were retained throughout much of the bacterial and archaeal domains of life and eukaryotic organelles. The indirect routes use non-discriminating aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase) to misaminoacylate the tRNA. The misaminoacylated tRNA formed is then transamidated into the amide aminoacyl-tRNA used in protein synthesis by tRNA-dependent amidotransferases (GatCAB and GatDE). The enzymes and tRNAs involved assemble into complexes known as transamidosomes to help maintain translational fidelity. These pathways have evolved to meet the varied cellular needs across a diverse set of organisms, leading to significant variation. In certain bacteria, the indirect pathways may provide a means to adapt to cellular stress by reducing the fidelity of protein synthesis. The retention of these indirect pathways versus acquisition of asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl tRNA synthetase in lineages likely involves a complex interplay of the competing uses of glutamine and asparagine beyond translation, energetic costs, co-evolution between enzymes and tRNA, and involvement in stress response that await further investigation.

Structural characterization of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) from Plasmodium falciparum

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are essential enzymes in protein translation machinery that provide the charged tRNAs needed for protein synthesis. Over the past decades, aaRSs have been studied as anti-parasitic, anti-bacterial, and anti-fungal drug targets. This study focused on the cytoplasmic glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) from Plasmodium falciparum, which belongs to class Ib in aaRSs. GluRS unlike most other aaRSs requires tRNA to activate its cognate amino acid substrate L-Glutamate (L-Glu), and fails to form an intermediate adenylate complex in the absence of tRNA. The crystal structures of the Apo, ATP, and ADP-bound forms of Plasmodium falciparum glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (PfGluRS) were solved at 2.1 Å, 2.2 Å, and 2.8 Å respectively. The structural comparison of the Apo- and ATP-bound holo-forms of PfGluRS showed considerable conformational changes in the loop regions around the ATP-binding pocket of the enzyme. Biophysical characterization of the PfGluRS showed binding of the enzyme substrates L-Gluand ATP.. The sequence and structural conservation were evident across GluRS compared to other species. The structural dissection of the PfGluRS gives insight into the critical residues involved in the binding of ATP substrate, which can be harvested to develop new antimalarial drugs.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases as Valuable Targets for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) catalyze the esterification of tRNA with a cognate amino acid and are essential enzymes in all three kingdoms of life. Due to their important role in the translation of the genetic code, aaRSs have been recognized as suitable targets for the development of small molecule anti-infectives. In this review, following a concise discussion of aaRS catalytic and proof-reading activities, the various inhibitory mechanisms of reported natural and synthetic aaRS inhibitors are discussed. Using the expanding repository of ligand-bound X-ray crystal structures, we classified these compounds based on their binding sites, focusing on their ability to compete with the association of one, or more of the canonical aaRS substrates. In parallel, we examined the determinants of species-selectivity and discuss potential resistance mechanisms of some of the inhibitor classes. Combined, this structural perspective highlights the opportunities for further exploration of the aaRS enzyme family as antimicrobial targets.

Regulation of tRNA-dependent translational quality control

Translation is the most error-prone process in protein synthesis; however, it is important that accuracy is maintained because erroneous translation has been shown to affect all domains of life. Translational quality control is maintained by both proteins and RNA through intricate processes. The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases help maintain high levels of translational accuracy through the esterification of tRNA and proofreading mechanisms. tRNA is often recognized by an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase in a sequence and structurally dependent manner, sometimes involving modified nucleotides. Additionally, some proofreading mechanisms of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases require tRNA elements for hydrolysis of a noncognate aminoacyl-tRNA. Finally, tRNA is also important for proper decoding of the mRNA message by codon and anticodon pairing. Here, recent developments regarding the importance of tRNA in maintenance of translational accuracy are reviewed. © 2019 IUBMB Life, 2019 © 2019 IUBMB Life, 71(8):1150-1157, 2019.

Initiator tRNA genes template the 3' CCA end at high frequencies in bacteria

Background

While the CCA sequence at the mature 3′ end of tRNAs is conserved and critical for translational function, a genetic template for this sequence is not always contained in tRNA genes. In eukaryotes and Archaea, the CCA ends of tRNAs are synthesized post-transcriptionally by CCA-adding enzymes. In Bacteria, tRNA genes template CCA sporadically.

Results

In order to understand the variation in how prokaryotic tRNA genes template CCA, we re-annotated tRNA genes in tRNAdb-CE database version 0.8. Among 132,129 prokaryotic tRNA genes, initiator tRNA genes template CCA at the highest average frequency (74.1%) over all functional classes except selenocysteine and pyrrolysine tRNA genes (88.1% and 100% respectively). Across bacterial phyla and a wide range of genome sizes, many lineages exist in which predominantly initiator tRNA genes template CCA. Convergent and parallel retention of CCA templating in initiator tRNA genes evolved in independent histories of reductive genome evolution in Bacteria. Also, in a majority of cyanobacterial and actinobacterial genera, predominantly initiator tRNA genes template CCA. We also found that a surprising fraction of archaeal tRNA genes template CCA.

Conclusions

We suggest that cotranscriptional synthesis of initiator tRNA CCA 3′ ends can complement inefficient processing of initiator tRNA precursors, “bootstrap” rapid initiation of protein synthesis from a non-growing state, or contribute to an increase in cellular growth rates by reducing overheads of mass and energy to maintain nonfunctional tRNA precursor pools. More generally, CCA templating in structurally non-conforming tRNA genes can afford cells robustness and greater plasticity to respond rapidly to environmental changes and stimuli.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3314-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bacterial transfer RNAs

Transfer RNA is an essential adapter molecule that is found across all three domains of life. The primary role of transfer RNA resides in its critical involvement in the accurate translation of messenger RNA codons during protein synthesis and, therefore, ultimately in the determination of cellular gene expression. This review aims to bring together the results of intensive investigations into the synthesis, maturation, modification, aminoacylation, editing and recycling of bacterial transfer RNAs. Codon recognition at the ribosome as well as the ever-increasing number of alternative roles for transfer RNA outside of translation will be discussed in the specific context of bacterial cells.

Fusion with anticodon binding domain of GluRS is not sufficient to alter the substrate specificity of a chimeric Glu-Q-RS

Glutamyl-queuosine-tRNA(Asp) synthetase (Glu-Q-RS) is a paralog of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) and is found in more than forty species of proteobacteria, cyanobacteria, and actinobacteria. Glu-Q-RS shows striking structural similarity with N-terminal catalytic domain of GluRS (NGluRS) but it lacks the C-terminal anticodon binding domain (CGluRS). In spite of structural similarities, Glu-Q-RS and NGluRS differ in their functional properties. Glu-Q-RS glutamylates the Q34 nucleotide of the anticodon of tRNA(Asp) whereas NGluRS constitutes the catalytic domain of GluRS catalyzing the transfer of Glu on the acceptor end of tRNA(Glu). Since NGluRS is able to catalyze aminoacylation of only tRNA(Glu) the glutamylation capacity of tRNA(Asp) by Glu-Q-RS is surprising. To understand the substrate specificity of Glu-Q-RS we undertook a systemic approach by investigating the biophysical and biochemical properties of the NGluRS (1-301), CGluRS (314-471) and Glu-Q-RS-CGluRS, (1-298 of Glu-Q-RS fused to 314-471 from GluRS). Circular dichroism, fluorescence spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry analyses revealed absence of N-terminal domain (1-298 of Glu-Q-RS) and C-terminal domain (314-471 from GluRS) communication in chimera, in contrast to the native full length GluRS. The chimeric Glu-Q-RS is still able to aminoacylate tRNA(Asp) but has also the capacity to bind tRNA(Glu). However the chimeric protein is unable to aminoacylate tRNA(Glu) probably as a consequence of the lack of domain-domain communication.

Emergence and evolution

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are essential components of the protein synthesis machinery responsible for defining the genetic code by pairing the correct amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. The aaRSs are an ancient enzyme family believed to have origins that may predate the last common ancestor and as such they provide insights into the evolution and development of the extant genetic code. Although the aaRSs have long been viewed as a highly conserved group of enzymes, findings within the last couple of decades have started to demonstrate how diverse and versatile these enzymes really are. Beyond their central role in translation, aaRSs and their numerous homologs have evolved a wide array of alternative functions both inside and outside translation. Current understanding of the emergence of the aaRSs, and their subsequent evolution into a functionally diverse enzyme family, are discussed in this chapter.

Yeast mitochondrial Gln-tRNA(Gln) is generated by a GatFAB-mediated transamidation pathway involving Arc1p-controlled subcellular sorting of cytosolic GluRS

It is impossible to predict which pathway, direct glutaminylation of tRNA(Gln) or tRNA-dependent transamidation of glutamyl-tRNA(Gln), generates mitochondrial glutaminyl-tRNA(Gln) for protein synthesis in a given species. The report that yeast mitochondria import both cytosolic glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and tRNA(Gln) has challenged the widespread use of the transamidation pathway in organelles. Here we demonstrate that yeast mitochondrial glutaminyl-tRNA(Gln) is in fact generated by a transamidation pathway involving a novel type of trimeric tRNA-dependent amidotransferase (AdT). More surprising is the fact that cytosolic glutamyl-tRNA synthetase ((c)ERS) is imported into mitochondria, where it constitutes the mitochondrial nondiscriminating ERS that generates the mitochondrial mischarged glutamyl-tRNA(Gln) substrate for the AdT. We show that dual localization of (c)ERS is controlled by binding to Arc1p, a tRNA nuclear export cofactor that behaves as a cytosolic anchoring platform for (c)ERS. Expression of Arc1p is down-regulated when yeast cells are switched from fermentation to respiratory metabolism, thus allowing increased import of (c)ERS to satisfy a higher demand of mitochondrial glutaminyl-tRNA(Gln) for mitochondrial protein synthesis. This novel strategy that enables a single protein to be localized in both the cytosol and mitochondria provides a new paradigm for regulation of the dynamic subcellular distribution of proteins between membrane-separated compartments.

Intraphylum diversity and complex evolution of cyanobacterial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

A comparative genomic analysis of 35 cyanobacterial strains has revealed that the gene complement of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and routes for aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis may differ among the species of this phylum. Several genes encoding AARS paralogues were identified in some genomes. In-depth phylogenetic analysis was done for each of these proteins to gain insight into their evolutionary history. GluRS, HisRS, ArgRS, ThrRS, CysRS, and Glu-Q-RS showed evidence of a complex evolutionary course as indicated by a number of inconsistencies with our reference tree for cyanobacterial phylogeny. In addition to sequence data, support for evolutionary hypotheses involving horizontal gene transfer or gene duplication events was obtained from other observations including biased sequence conservation, the presence of indels (insertions or deletions), or vestigial traces of ancestral redundant genes. We present evidences for a novel protein domain with two putative transmembrane helices recruited independently by distinct AARS in particular cyanobacteria.

tRNA-dependent asparagine formation in prokaryotes: characterization, isolation and structural and functional analysis of a ribonucleoprotein particle generating Asn-tRNA(Asn)

In some living organisms the 20 aa-tRNA species participating in protein synthesis are not charged by a complete set of 20 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. In prokaryotes, the deficiency of asparaginyl- and/or glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases is compensated by another aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase of relaxed specificity that mischarges the orphan tRNA and by an enzyme that converts the amino acid into that homologous to the tRNA. In Thermus thermophilus Asn-tRNA(Asn) is formed indirectly via a two-step pathway whereby tRNA(Asn) is mischarged with Asp that will subsequently be amidated into Asn by an amidotransferase. The non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, the trimeric GatCAB tRNA-dependent amidotransferase and the tRNA(Asn) promoting this pathway assemble into a ribonucleoprotein particle termed transamidosome. This article deals with the methods and techniques employed to clone the genes encoding the enzymes and the tRNA involved in this pathway, to express them in Escherichia coli, to isolate them on a large scale, and to transcribe and produce mg quantities of pure tRNA(Asn)in vitro. The approaches designed especially for this system include (i) clustering of the ORFs encoding the subunits of the heterotrimeric GatCAB that are sprinkled in the genome into an artificial operon, and (ii) the self-cleavage of the tRNA(Asn) transcript starting with U in 5' position through fusion with a hammerhead ribozyme. Further, the crystallization of the free enzymes is described and the characterization of their assembly with tRNA(Asn) into a ribonucleoprotein particle, as well as the investigation of the catalytic mechanism of Asn-tRNA(Asn) formation by the complex are reported.

The transamidosome: a dynamic ribonucleoprotein particle dedicated to prokaryotic tRNA-dependent asparagine biosynthesis

Asparagine, one of the 22 genetically encoded amino acids, can be synthesized by a tRNA-dependent mechanism. So far, this type of pathway was believed to proceed via two independent steps. A nondiscriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-DRS) first generates a mischarged aspartyl-tRNAAsn that dissociates from the enzyme and binds to a tRNA-dependent amidotransferase (AdT), which then converts the tRNA-bound aspartate into asparagine. We show herein that the ND-DRS, tRNAAsn, and AdT assemble into a specific ribonucleoprotein complex called transamidosome that remains stable during the overall catalytic process. Our results indicate that the tRNAAsn-mediated linkage between the ND-DRS and AdT enables channeling of the mischarged aspartyl-tRNAAsn intermediate between DRS and AdT active sites to prevent challenging of the genetic code integrity. We propose that formation of a ribonucleoprotein is a general feature for tRNA-dependent amino acid biosynthetic pathways that are remnants of earlier stages when amino acid synthesis and tRNA aminoacylation were coupled.

Medicago truncatula root nodule proteome analysis reveals differential plant and bacteroid responses to drought stress

Drought is one of the environmental factors most affecting crop production. Under drought, symbiotic nitrogen fixation is one of the physiological processes to first show stress responses in nodulated legumes. This inhibition process involves a number of factors whose interactions are not yet understood. This work aims to further understand changes occurring in nodules under drought stress from a proteomic perspective. Drought was imposed on Medicago truncatula 'Jemalong A17' plants grown in symbiosis with Sinorhizobium meliloti strain 2011. Changes at the protein level were analyzed using a nongel approach based on liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Due to the complexity of nodule tissue, the separation of plant and bacteroid fractions in M. truncatula root nodules was first checked with the aim of minimizing cross contamination between the fractions. Second, the protein plant fraction of M. truncatula nodules was profiled, leading to the identification of 377 plant proteins, the largest description of the plant nodule proteome so far. Third, both symbiotic partners were independently analyzed for quantitative differences at the protein level during drought stress. Multivariate data mining allowed for the classification of proteins sets that were involved in drought stress responses. The isolation of the nodule plant and bacteroid protein fractions enabled the independent analysis of the response of both counterparts, gaining further understanding of how each symbiotic member is distinctly affected at the protein level under a water-deficit situation.

Regulated expression of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase is directed by a mobile genetic element in the cyanobacterium Tolypothrix sp. PCC 7601

The genome of Tolypothrix sp. PCC 7601 carries two copies of a novel insertion sequence, ISTosp1. One of the two copies is located upstream of the gene encoding glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, an enzyme playing a key role in protein and pigment synthesis. The tnpA gene of the IS element and gltX were co-transcribed and their expression was transiently upregulated upon retrieval of the ammonium source irrespective of whether nitrate or no nitrogen source were available. The second copy is also transcribed and shows a similar regulatory pattern. Structural elements of the promoter (-10 and -35 sequences) directing the expression of the tnpA-gltX operon have been localized within the IS. Regulatory sequences involving the NtcA transcription factor in the control of tnpA-gltX expression were found both within and in sequences upstream of the insertion element. The expression of gltX in a closely related cyanobacterium, Nostoc sp. PCC 7120, which lacks the insertion upstream of gltX, decreased upon ammonium retrieval, a regulatory pattern that markedly differs from that observed in Tolypothrix sp. PCC 7601. ISTosp1 constitutes a good example of how cells can make use of a transposable element to evolve an original regulatory mechanism.

The nondiscriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase from Helicobacter pylori: anticodon-binding domain mutations that impact tRNA specificity and heterologous toxicity

Divergent tRNA substrate recognition patterns distinguish the two distinct forms of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) that exist in different bacteria. In some cases, a canonical, discriminating AspRS (D-AspRS) specifically generates Asp-tRNA(Asp) and usually coexists with asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (AsnRS). In other bacteria, particularly those that lack AsnRS, AspRS is nondiscriminating (ND-AspRS) and generates both Asp-tRNA(Asp) and the noncanonical, misacylated Asp-tRNA(Asn); this misacylated tRNA is subsequently repaired by the glutamine-dependent Asp-tRNA(Asn)/Glu-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase (Asp/Glu-Adt). The molecular features that distinguish the closely related bacterial D-AspRS and ND-AspRS are not well-understood. Here, we report the first characterization of the ND-AspRS from the human pathogen Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori or Hp). This enzyme is toxic when heterologously overexpressed in Escherichia coli. This toxicity is rescued upon coexpression of the Hp Asp/Glu-Adt, indicating that Hp Asp/Glu-Adt can utilize E. coli Asp-tRNA(Asn) as a substrate. Finally, mutations in the anticodon-binding domain of Hp ND-AspRS reduce this enzyme's ability to misacylate tRNA(Asn), in a manner that correlates with the toxicity of the enzyme in E. coli.

Structural Basis for tRNA-Dependent Amidotransferase Function

Besides direct charging of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, indirect routes also ensure attachment of some amino acids onto tRNA. Such routes may explain how new amino acids entered into protein synthesis. In archaea and in most bacteria, tRNA(Gln) is first misaminoacylated by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. Glu-tRNA(Gln) is then matured into Gln-tRNA(Gln) by a tRNA-dependent amidotransferase. We report the structure of a tRNA-dependent amidotransferase-that of GatDE from Pyrococcus abyssi. The 3.0 A resolution crystal structure shows a tetramer with two GatD molecules as the core and two GatE molecules at the periphery. The fold of GatE cannot be related to that of any tRNA binding enzyme. The ammonium donor site on GatD and the tRNA site on GatE are markedly distant. Comparison of GatD and L-asparaginase structures shows how the motion of a beta hairpin region containing a crucial catalytic threonine may control the overall reaction cycle of GatDE.

Glu-Q-tRNAAsp synthetase coded by the yadB gene, a new paralog of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that glutamylates tRNAAsp anticodon

Analysis of the completed genome sequences revealed presence in various bacteria of an open reading frame (ORF) encoding a polypeptide chain presenting important similarities with the catalytic domain of glutamyl-tRNA synthetases but deprived of the C-terminal anticodon-binding domain. This paralog of glutamyl-tRNA synthetases, the YadB protein, activates glutamate in the absence of tRNA and transfers the activated glutamate not on tRNA(Glu) but instead on tRNA(Asp). It has been shown that tRNA(Asp) is able to accept two amino acids: aspartate charged by aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and glutamate charged by YadB. The functional properties of YadB contrast with those of the canonical glutamyl-tRNA synthetases, which activate Glu only in presence of the cognate tRNA before aminoacylation of the 3'-end of tRNA. Biochemical approaches and mass spectrometry investigations revealed that YadB transfers the activated glutamate on the cyclopenthene-diol ring of the modified nucleoside queuosine posttranscriptionally inserted at the wobble position of the anticodon-loop to form glutamyl-queuosine. Unstability of the ester bond between the glutamate residue and the cyclopenthene-diol (half-life 7.5 min) explains why until now this modification escaped detection. Among Escherichia coli tRNAs containing queuosine in the wobble position, only tRNA(Asp) is substrate of YadB. Sequence comparison reveals a structural mimicry between the anticodon-stem and loop of tRNA(Asp) and the amino acid acceptor-stem of tRNA(Glu). YadB, renamed glutamyl-Q-tRNA(Asp) synthetase, constitutes the first enzyme structurally related to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases which catalyzes a hypermodification in tRNA, and whose function seems to be conserved among prokaryotes. The discovery of glutamyl-Q-tRNA(Asp) synthetase breaks down the current paradigm according to which the catalytic domain of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases recognizes the amino acid acceptor-stem of tRNA and aminoacylates the 3'-terminal ribose. The evolutionary significance of the existence of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase paralog dedicated to the hypermodification of a tRNA anticodon will be discussed.

The Escherichia coli YadB gene product reveals a novel aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase like activity

In the course of a structural genomics program aiming at solving the structures of Escherichia coli open reading frame products of unknown function, we have determined the structure of YadB at 1.5A using molecular replacement. The YadB protein is 298 amino acid residues long and displays 34% sequence identity with E.coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS). It is much shorter than GluRS, which contains 468 residues, and lacks the complete domain interacting with the tRNA anticodon loop. As E.coli GluRS, YadB possesses a Zn2+ located in the putative tRNA acceptor stem-binding domain. The YadB cluster uses cysteine residues as the first three zinc ligands, but has a weaker tyrosine ligand at the fourth position. It shares with canonical amino acid RNA synthetases a major functional feature, namely activation of the amino acid (here glutamate). It differs, however, from GluRSs by the fact that the activation step is tRNA-independent and that it does not catalyze attachment of the activated glutamate to E.coli tRNAGlu, but to another, as yet unknown tRNA. These results suggest thus a novel function, distinct from that of GluRSs, for the yadB gene family.

An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-like protein encoded by the Escherichia coli yadB gene glutamylates specifically tRNAAsp

The product of the Escherichia coli yadB gene is homologous to the N-terminal part of bacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRSs), including the Rossmann fold with the acceptor-binding domain and the stem-contact fold. This GluRS-like protein, which lacks the anticodon-binding domain, does not use tRNA(Glu) as substrate in vitro nor in vivo, but aminoacylates tRNA(Asp) with glutamate. The yadB gene is expressed in wild-type E. coli as an operon with the dksA gene, which encodes a protein involved in the general stress response by means of its action at the translational level. The fate of the glutamylated tRNA(Asp) is not known, but its incapacity to bind elongation factor Tu suggests that it is not involved in ribosomal protein synthesis. Genes homologous to yadB are present only in bacteria, mostly in Proteobacteria. Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses show that the YadB proteins form a distinct monophyletic group related to the bacterial and organellar GluRSs (alpha-type GlxRSs superfamily) with ubiquitous function as suggested by the similar functional properties of the YadB homologue from Neisseria meningitidis.

Coevolution of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with its tRNA substrates

Glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRSs) occur in two types, the discriminating and the nondiscriminating enzymes. They differ in their choice of substrates and use either tRNAGlu or both tRNAGlu and tRNAGln. Although most organisms encode only one GluRS, a number of bacteria encode two different GluRS proteins; yet, the tRNA specificity of these enzymes and the reason for such gene duplications are unknown. A database search revealed duplicated GluRS genes in >20 bacterial species, suggesting that this phenomenon is not unusual in the bacterial domain. To determine the tRNA preferences of GluRS, we chose the duplicated enzyme sets from Helicobacter pylori and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. H. pylori contains one tRNAGlu and one tRNAGln species, whereas A. ferrooxidans possesses two of each. We show that the duplicated GluRS proteins are enzyme pairs with complementary tRNA specificities. The H. pylori GluRS1 acylated only tRNAGlu, whereas GluRS2 was specific solely for tRNAGln. The A. ferrooxidans GluRS2 preferentially charged tRNA(UUG)(Gln). Conversely, A. ferrooxidans GluRS1 glutamylated both tRNAGlu isoacceptors and the tRNA(CUG)(Gln) species. These three tRNA species have two structural elements in common, the augmented D-helix and a deletion of nucleotide 47. It appears that the discriminating or nondiscriminating natures of different GluRS enzymes have been derived by the coevolution of protein and tRNA structure. The coexistence of the two GluRS enzymes in one organism may lay the groundwork for the acquisition of the canonical glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase by lateral gene transfer from eukaryotes.

A new noncanonical nuclear genetic code: translation of UAA into glutamate

Deviant genetic codes reported in ciliates share the same feature: one (UGA) or two (UAR) of the three canonical stop codons are translated into one particular amino acid. In many genera, such as Oxytricha, Paramecium, and Tetrahymena, UAR codons are translated into glutamine. UGA is translated into cysteine in Euplotes or into tryptophan in Colpoda inflata and Blepharisma americanum. Here, we show that three peritrich species (Vorticella microstoma, Opisthonecta henneguyi, and Opisthonecta matiensis) translate UAA into glutamate and that at least UAA in O. matiensis is decoded through a mutant suppressor-like tRNA. This kind of genetic code has never been reported for any living organism. Phylogenetic analysis with alpha-tubulin sequences corroborates that peritrichs, peniculines (Paramecium), and hymenostomates (Tetrahymena) form a monophyletic group (class Oligohymenophorea). The differential translation (glu/gln) of UAR codons, the monophyly of the Oligohymenophorea, and the common evolutionary origin of glutamate and glutamine suggest that deviant genetic codes of present-day oligohymenophoreans could have the same origin.

Molecular evolution before the origin of species

Amino acids at conserved sites in the residue sequence of 10 ancient proteins, from 844 phylogenetically diverse sources, were used to specify their time of origin in the interval before species divergence from the last common ancestor (LCA). The order of amino acid addition to the genetic code, based on biosynthesis path length and other molecular evidence, provided a reference for evaluating the 'code age' of each residue profile examined. Significantly earlier estimates were obtained for conserved amino acid residues in these proteins than non-conserved residues. Evidence from the primary structure of 'fossil' proteins thus corroborated the biosynthetic order of amino acid addition to the code.Low potential ferredoxin (Fdxn) had the earliest residue profile among the proteins in this study. A phylogenetic tree for 82 prokaryote Fdxn sequences was rooted midway between bacteria and archaea branches. LCA Fdxn had a 23-residue antecedent whose residue profile matched mid-expansion phase codon assignments and included an amide residue. It contained a highly acidic N-terminal region and a non-charged C-terminal region, with all four cysteine residues. This small protein apparently anchored a [4Fe-4S] cluster, ligated by C-terminal cysteines, to a positively charged mineral surface, consistent with mediating e(-) transfer in a primordial surface system before cells appeared. Its negatively charged N-terminal 'attachment site' was highly mutable during evolution of ancestral Fdxn for Bacteria and Archaea, consistent with a loss of function after cell formation. An initial glutamate to lysine substitution may link 'attachment site' removal to early post-expansion phase entry of basic amino acids to the code. As proteins evidently anchored non-charged amide residues initially, surface attachment of cofactors and other functional groups emerges as a general function of pre-cell proteins.A phylogenetic tree of 107 proteolipid (PL) helix-1 sequences from H(+)-ATPase of bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes had its root between prokaryote branches. LCA PL h1 residue profile optimally fit a late expansion phase codon array. Sequence repeats in transmembrane PL helices h1 and h2 indicated formation of the archetypal PL hairpin structure involved successive tandem duplications, initiated within the gene for an 11-residue (or 4-residue) hydrophobic peptide. Ancestral PL h1 lacked acidic residues, in a fundamental departure from the prototype pre-cell protein. By this stage, proteins with a hydrophobic domain had evolved. Its non-polar, late expansion phase residue profile point to ancestral PL being a component of an early permeable cell membrane. Other indicators of cell formation about this stage of code evolution include phospholipid biosynthesis path length, FtsZ residue profile, and late entry of basic amino acids into the genetic code. Estimates based on conserved residues in prokaryote cell septation protein, FtsZ, and proteins involved with synthesis, transcription and replication of DNA revealed FtsZ, ribonucleotide reductase, RNA polymerase core subunits and 5'-->3' flap exonuclease, FEN-1, originated soon after cells putatively evolved. While reverse transcriptase and topoisomerase I, Topo I, appeared late in the pre-divergence era, when the genetic code was essentially complete. The transition from RNA genes to a DNA genome seemingly proceeded via formation of a DNA-RNA heteroduplex. These results suggest formation of DNA awaited evolution of a catalyst with a hydrophobic domain, capable of sequestering radical bearing intermediates in its synthesis from ribonucleotide precursors. Late formation of topology altering protein, Topo I, further suggests consolidation of genes into chromosomes followed synthesis of comparatively thermostable DNA strands.

A single amidotransferase forms asparaginyl-tRNA and glutaminyl-tRNA in Chlamydia trachomatis

Aminoacyl-tRNA is generally formed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, a family of 20 enzymes essential for accurate protein synthesis. However, most bacteria generate one of the two amide aminoacyl-tRNAs, Asn-tRNA or Gln-tRNA, by transamidation of mischarged Asp-tRNA(Asn) or Glu-tRNA(Gln) catalyzed by a heterotrimeric amidotransferase (encoded by the gatA, gatB, and gatC genes). The Chlamydia trachomatis genome sequence reveals genes for 18 synthetases, whereas those for asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase are absent. Yet the genome harbors three gat genes in an operon-like arrangement (gatCAB). We reasoned that Chlamydia uses the gatCAB-encoded amidotransferase to generate both Asn-tRNA and Gln-tRNA. C. trachomatis aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and glutamyl-tRNA synthetase were shown to be non-discriminating synthetases that form the misacylated tRNA(Asn) and tRNA(Gln) species. A preparation of pure heterotrimeric recombinant C. trachomatis amidotransferase converted Asp-tRNA(Asn) and Glu-tRNA(Gln) into Asn-tRNA and Gln-tRNA, respectively. The enzyme used glutamine, asparagine, or ammonia as amide donors in the presence of either ATP or GTP. These results suggest that C. trachomatis employs the dual specificity gatCAB-encoded amidotransferase and 18 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to create the complete set of 20 aminoacyl-tRNAs.

Glutamyl-gamma-boronate inhibitors of bacterial Glu-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase

Analogues of glutamyl-gamma-boronate (1) were synthesized as mechanism-based inhibitors of bacterial Glu-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase (Glu-AdT) and were designed to engage a putative catalytic serine nucleophile required for the glutaminase activity of the enzyme. Although 1 provides potent enzyme inhibition, structure-activity studies revealed a narrow range of tolerated chemical changes that maintained activity. Nonetheless, growth inhibition of organisms that require Glu-AdT by the most potent enzyme inhibitors appears to validate mechanism-based inhibitor design of Glu-AdT as an approach to antimicrobial development.

Domain-specific recruitment of amide amino acids for protein synthesis

The formation of aminoacyl-transfer RNA is a crucial step in ensuring the accuracy of protein synthesis. Despite the central importance of this process in all living organisms, it remains unknown how archaea and some bacteria synthesize Asn-tRNA and Gln-tRNA. These amide aminoacyl-tRNAs can be formed by the direct acylation of tRNA, catalysed by asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, respectively. A separate, indirect pathway involves the formation of mis-acylated Asp-tRNA(Asn) or Glu-tRNA(Gln), and the subsequent amidation of these amino acids while they are bound to tRNA, which is catalysed by amidotransferases. Here we show that all archaea possess an archaea-specific heterodimeric amidotransferase (encoded by gatD and gatE) for Gln-tRNA formation. However, Asn-tRNA synthesis in archaea is divergent: some archaea use asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase, whereas others use a heterotrimeric amidotransferase (encoded by the gatA, gatB and gatC genes). Because bacteria primarily use transamidation, and the eukaryal cytoplasm uses glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, it appears that the three domains use different mechanisms for Gln-tRNA synthesis; as such, this is the only known step in protein synthesis where all three domains have diverged. Closer inspection of the two amidotransferases reveals that each of them recruited a metabolic enzyme to aid its function; this provides direct evidence for a relationship between amino-acid metabolism and protein biosynthesis.

The adaptor hypothesis revisited

As originally postulated in Crick's Adaptor hypothesis, the faithful synthesis of proteins from messenger RNA is dependent on the presence of perfectly acylated tRNAs. The hypothesis also suggested that each aminoacyl-tRNA would be made by a unique enzyme. Recent data have now forced a revision of this latter point, with an increasingly diverse array of enzymes and pathways being implicated in aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. These unexpected findings have far-reaching implications for our understanding of protein synthesis and its origins.

The free yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase differs from the tRNA(Asp)-complexed enzyme by structural changes in the catalytic site, hinge region, and anticodon-binding domain

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the specific charging of amino acid residues on tRNAs. Accurate recognition of a tRNA by its synthetase is achieved through sequence and structural signalling. It has been shown that tRNAs undergo large conformational changes upon binding to enzymes, but little is known about the conformational rearrangements in tRNA-bound synthetases. To address this issue the crystal structure of the dimeric class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from yeast was solved in its free form and compared to that of the protein associated to the cognate tRNA(Asp). The use of an enzyme truncated in N terminus improved the crystal quality and allowed us to solve and refine the structure of free AspRS at 2.3 A resolution. For the first time, snapshots are available for the different macromolecular states belonging to the same tRNA aminoacylation system, comprising the free forms for tRNA and enzyme, and their complex. Overall, the synthetase is less affected by the association than the tRNA, although significant local changes occur. They concern a rotation of the anticodon binding domain and a movement in the hinge region which connects the anticodon binding and active-site domains in the AspRS subunit. The most dramatic differences are observed in two evolutionary conserved loops. Both are in the neighborhood of the catalytic site and are of importance for ligand binding. The combination of this structural analysis with mutagenesis and enzymology data points to a tRNA binding process that starts by a recognition event between the tRNA anticodon loop and the synthetase anticodon binding module.

Thermus thermophilus contains an eubacterial and an archaebacterial aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

Thermus thermophilus possesses two aspartyl-tRNA synthetases (AspRSs), AspRS1 and AspRS2, encoded by distinct genes. Alignment of the protein sequences with AspRSs of other origins reveals that AspRS1 possesses the structural features of eubacterial AspRSs, whereas AspRS2 is structurally related to the archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural dissimilarity between the two thermophilic AspRSs is correlated with functional divergences. AspRS1 aspartylates tRNA(Asp) whereas AspRS2 aspartylates tRNA(Asp), and tRNA(Asn) with similar efficiencies. Since Asp bound on tRNA(Asn) is converted into Asn by a tRNA-dependent aspartate amidotransferase, AspRS2 is involved in Asn-tRNA(Asn) formation. These properties relate functionally AspRS2 to archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural basis of the dual specificity of T. thermophilus tRNA(Asn) was investigated by comparing its sequence with those of tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) of strict specificity. It is shown that the thermophilic tRNA(Asn) contains the elements defining asparagine identity in Escherichia coli, part of which being also the major elements of aspartate identity, whereas minor elements of this identity are missing. The structural context that permits expression of aspartate and asparagine identities by tRNA(Asn) and how AspRS2 accommodates tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) will be discussed. This work establishes a distinct structure-function relationship of eubacterial and archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural and functional properties of the two thermophilic AspRSs will be discussed in the context of the modern and primitive pathways of tRNA aspartylation and asparaginylation and related to the phylogenetic connexion of T. thermophilus to eubacteria and archaebacteria.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the genetic code, and the evolutionary process

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and their relationship to the genetic code are examined from the evolutionary perspective. Despite a loose correlation between codon assignments and AARS evolutionary relationships, the code is far too highly structured to have been ordered merely through the evolutionary wanderings of these enzymes. Nevertheless, the AARSs are very informative about the evolutionary process. Examination of the phylogenetic trees for each of the AARSs reveals the following. (i) Their evolutionary relationships mostly conform to established organismal phylogeny: a strong distinction exists between bacterial- and archaeal-type AARSs. (ii) Although the evolutionary profiles of the individual AARSs might be expected to be similar in general respects, they are not. It is argued that these differences in profiles reflect the stages in the evolutionary process when the taxonomic distributions of the individual AARSs became fixed, not the nature of the individual enzymes. (iii) Horizontal transfer of AARS genes between Bacteria and Archaea is asymmetric: transfer of archaeal AARSs to the Bacteria is more prevalent than the reverse, which is seen only for the "gemini group. " (iv) The most far-ranging transfers of AARS genes have tended to occur in the distant evolutionary past, before or during formation of the primary organismal domains. These findings are also used to refine the theory that at the evolutionary stage represented by the root of the universal phylogenetic tree, cells were far more primitive than their modern counterparts and thus exchanged genetic material in far less restricted ways, in effect evolving in a communal sense.

Evolution of the genetic code

Comparative path lengths in amino acid biosynthesis and other molecular indicators of the timing of codon assignment were examined to reconstruct the main stages of code evolution. The codon tree obtained was rooted in the 4 N-fixing amino acids (Asp, Glu, Asn, Gln) and 16 triplets of the NAN set. This small, locally phased (commaless) code evidently arose from ambiguous translation on a poly(A) collector strand, in a surface reaction network. Copolymerisation of these amino acids yields polyanionic peptide chains, which could anchor uncharged amide residues to a positively charged mineral surface. From RNA virus structure and replication in vitro, the first genes seemed to be RNA segments spliced into tRNA. Expansion of the code reduced the risk of mutation to an unreadable codon. This step was conditional on initiation at the 5'-codon of a translated sequence. Incorporation of increasingly hydrophobic amino acids accompanied expansion. As codons of the NUN set were assigned most slowly, they received the most nonpolar amino acids. The origin of ferredoxin and Gln synthetase was traced to mid-expansion phase. Surface metabolism ceased by the end of code expansion, as cells bounded by a proteo-phospholipid membrane, with a protoATPase, had emerged. Incorporation of positively charged and aromatic amino acids followed. They entered the post-expansion code by codon capture. Synthesis of efficient enzymes with acid-base catalysis was then possible. Both types of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases were attributed to this stage. tRNA sequence diversity and error rates in RNA replication indicate the code evolved within 20 million yr in the preIsuan era. These findings on the genetic code provide empirical evidence, from a contemporaneous source, that a surface reaction network, centred on C-fixing autocatalytic cycles, rapidly led to cellular life on Earth.

Archaeal aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis: diversity replaces dogma

Accurate aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis is essential for faithful translation of the genetic code and consequently has been intensively studied for over three decades. Until recently, the study of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis in archaea had received little attention. However, as in so many areas of molecular biology, the advent of archaeal genome sequencing has now drawn researchers to this field. Investigations with archaea have already led to the discovery of novel pathways and enzymes for the synthesis of numerous aminoacyl-tRNAs. The most surprising of these findings has been a transamidation pathway for the synthesis of asparaginyl-tRNA and a novel lysyl-tRNA synthetase. In addition, seryl- and phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases that are only marginally related to known examples outside the archaea have been characterized, and the mechanism of cysteinyl-tRNA formation in Methanococcus jannaschii and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum is still unknown. These results have revealed completely unexpected levels of complexity and diversity, questioning the notion that aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis is one of the most conserved functions in gene expression. It has now become clear that the distribution of the various mechanisms of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis in extant organisms has been determined by numerous gene transfer events, indicating that, while the process of protein biosynthesis is orthologous, its constituents are not.

Evolutionary anomalies among the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Unexpected relationships among the various aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases continue to be uncovered. The question arises - is this mainly the result of promiscuous exchange, or is the confusion really a reflection of the differential loss of past duplications? Phylogenetic analysis may yet provide the answer.

Thermus thermophilus: a link in evolution of the tRNA-dependent amino acid amidation pathways

Thermus thermophilus possesses an aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS2) able to aspartylate efficiently tRNAAsp and tRNAAsn. Aspartate mischarged on tRNAAsn then is converted into asparagine by an omega amidase that differs structurally from all known asparagine synthetases. However, aspartate is not misincorporated into proteins because the binding capacity of aminoacylated tRNAAsn to elongation factor Tu is only conferred by conversion of aspartate into asparagine. T. thermophilus additionally contains a second aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS1) able to aspartylate tRNAAsp and an asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase able to charge tRNAAsn with free asparagine, although the organism does not contain a tRNA-independent asparagine synthetase. In contrast to the duplicated pathway of tRNA asparaginylation, tRNA glutaminylation occurs in the thermophile via the usual pathway by using glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and free glutamine synthesized by glutamine synthetase that is unique. T. thermophilus is able to ensure tRNA aminoacylation by alternative routes involving either the direct pathway or by conversion of amino acid mischarged on tRNA. These findings shed light on the interrelation between the tRNA-dependent and tRNA-independent pathways of amino acid amidation and on the processes involved in fidelity of the aminoacylation systems.

Retracing the evolution of amino acid specificity in glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase

Molecular phylogenetic studies of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase suggest that it has relatively recently evolved from the closely related enzyme glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. We have now attempted to retrace one of the key steps in this process by selecting glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase mutants displaying enhanced glutamic acid recognition. Mutagenesis of two residues proximal to the active site, Phe-90 and Tyr-240, was found to improve glutamic acid recognition 3-5-fold in vitro and resulted in the misacylation of tRNA(Gln) with glutamic acid. In vivo expression of the genes encoding these misacylating variants of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase reduced cellular growth rates by 40%, probably as a result of an increase in translational error rates. These results provide the first biochemical evidence that glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase originated through duplication and consequent diversification of an ancestral glutamyl-tRNA synthetase-encoding gene.

Switching the amino acid specificity of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

The accuracy of protein synthesis essentially rests on aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that ensure the correct attachment of an amino acid to the cognate tRNA molecule. The selection of the amino acid substrate involves a recognition stage generally followed by a proofreading reaction. Therefore, to change the amino acid specificity of a synthetase in the aminoacylation reaction, it is necessary to alleviate the molecular barriers which contribute its editing function. In an attempt to accommodate a noncognate amino acid into the active site of a synthetase, we chose a pair of closely related enzymes. The current hypothesis designates glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) as a late component of the protein synthesis machinery, emerging in the eukaryotic lineage by duplication of the gene for glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS). By introducing GluRS-specific features into the Rossmann dinucleotide-binding domain of human GlnRS, we constructed a mutant GlnRS which preferentially aminoacylates tRNA with glutamate instead of glutamine. Our data suggest that not only the transition state for aminoacyl-AMP formation but also the proofreading site of GlnRS are affected by that mutation.

The terminal adenosine of tRNA(Gln) mediates tRNA-dependent amino acid recognition by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase

Sequence-specific interactions between Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and tRNA(Gln) have been shown to determine the apparent affinity of the enzyme for its cognate amino acid glutamine during aminoacylation. Specifically, structural and biochemical studies suggested that residues Asp66, Tyr211, and Phe233 in glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase could potentially facilitate cognate amino recognition through their specific interactions with both A76 of tRNA(Gln)++ and glutamine. These residues were randomly mutated and the resulting glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase variants were screened in vivo for changes in their ability to recognize noncognate tRNAs and retention of tRNA-glutaminylation activity. When the variants selected in this way were characterized in vitro, they all showed dramatic decreases in apparent affinity (KM) for glutamine but little or no change in cognate tRNA affinity. Conservative replacements such as Y211F, F233L, and D66E resulted in 60-, 19-, and 18-fold increases compared to wild-type in the KM for glutamine, respectively, but had little effect on the turnover number (kcat). Nonconservative replacements affected both KM for glutamine and kcat; Y211S, F233D, and D66F displayed 1700, 3700, and 1200-fold decreases in kcat/KM for glutamine compared to wild-type. Double mutant cycle analysis indicated that Tyr211, and Phe233 interact strongly to enhance glutamine binding. These data now show that Asp66, Tyr211 and Phe233 mediate tRNA-dependent cognate amino acid recognition via the invariant 3'-terminal adenosine of tRNA(Gln).

Genomics: re-evaluation of translation machinery evolution

Experiments based on genome sequence analysis have revealed unexpected complexity in the evolution of the translation apparatus, including concerted evolution of Gln-tRNA synthetase and Glu-tRNAGln amidotransferase, and a novel, class I Lys-tRNA synthetase shared by archaea and spirochaetes.

Glu-tRNAGln amidotransferase: a novel heterotrimeric enzyme required for correct decoding of glutamine codons during translation

The three genes, gatC, gatA, and gatB, which constitute the transcriptional unit of the Bacillus subtilis glutamyl-tRNAGln amidotransferase have been cloned. Expression of this transcriptional unit results in the production of a heterotrimeric protein that has been purified to homogeneity. The enzyme furnishes a means for formation of correctly charged Gln-tRNAGln through the transamidation of misacylated Glu-tRNAGln, functionally replacing the lack of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase activity in Gram-positive eubacteria, cyanobacteria, Archaea, and organelles. Disruption of this operon is lethal. This demonstrates that transamidation is the only pathway to Gln-tRNAGln in B. subtilis and that glutamyl-tRNAGln amidotransferase is a novel and essential component of the translational apparatus.

Leishmania tarentolae contains distinct cytosolic and mitochondrial glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase activities

The intracellular distribution of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases and their role in mitochondrial tRNA import were evaluated in the ancient eukaryote Leishmania tarentolae. The following results were obtained: (i) Glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase was detected in leishmanial mitochondria. This was unexpected because it has been postulated that, in organelles, Gln-tRNAGln is not formed by direct acylation of tRNAGln but by enzymatic transamidation of misacylated Glu-tRNAGln. (ii) Whereas the cytosolic extract is able to charge cytosolic and mitochondrial tRNAsGln, the mitochondrial matrix extract does not aminoacylate the cytosol-specific tRNAGln. This indicates that mitochondrial and cytosolic glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases are distinct. (iii) Seven of the 11 nucleotides that differ between the cytosolic and the mitochondrial tRNAGln are sufficient to convert the cytosol-specific tRNAGln into an optimal substrate for the mitochondrial enzyme. These nucleotides are arranged in three groups consisting of the nucleotides flanking the anticodon stem, the 5' nucleotide of the anticodon, and four nucleotides within the acceptor stem. And (iv), it was shown that the identity elements for recognition by the mitochondrial glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase do not overlap with a previously identified sequence segment required for mitochondrial import of the tRNAGln.

Existence of two distinct aspartyl-tRNA synthetases in Thermus thermophilus. Structural and biochemical properties of the two enzymes

Two aspartyl-tRNA synthetases (AspRSs) were isolated from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Both are alpha2 dimers but differ in the length of their polypeptide chains (AspRS1, 68 kDa; and AspRS2, 51 kDa). Both chains start with Met and are deprived of common sequences to a significant extent. This rules out the possibility that AspRS2 is derived from AspRS1 by proteolysis, in agreement with specific recognition of each AspRS by the homologous antibodies. DNA probes derived from N-terminal amino acid sequences hybridize specifically to different genomic DNA fragments, revealing that the two AspRSs are encoded by distinct genes. Both enzymes are present in various strains from T. thermophilus and along the growth cycle of the bacteria, suggesting that they are constitutive. Kinetic investigations show that the two enzymes are specific for aspartic acid activation and tRNAAsp charging. tRNA aspartylation by the thermostable AspRSs is governed by thermodynamic parameters which values are similar to those measured for mesophilic aspartylation systems. Both thermophilic AspRSs are deprived of species specificity for tRNA aspartylation and exhibit N-terminal sequence signatures found in other AspRSs, suggesting that they are evolutionarily related to AspRSs from mesophilic prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Comparison of the efficiency of tRNA aspartylation by each enzyme under conditions approaching the physiological ones suggests that in vivo tRNAAsp charging is essentially ensured by AspRS1, although AspRS2 is the major species. The physiological significance of the two different AspRSs in T. thermophilus is discussed.