Active site interference and asymmetric activation in the chemotaxis protein histidine kinase CheA

Engineered chemotaxis core signaling units indicate a constrained kinase-off state

Bacterial chemoreceptors, the histidine kinase CheA, and the coupling protein CheW form transmembrane molecular arrays with remarkable sensing properties. The receptors inhibit or stimulate CheA kinase activity depending on the presence of attractants or repellants, respectively. We engineered chemoreceptor cytoplasmic regions to assume a trimer of receptor dimers configuration that formed well-defined complexes with CheA and CheW and promoted a CheA kinase-off state. These mimics of core signaling units were assembled to homogeneity and investigated by site-directed spin-labeling with pulse-dipolar electron-spin resonance spectroscopy (PDS), small-angle x-ray scattering, targeted protein cross-linking, and cryo-electron microscopy. The kinase-off state was especially stable, had relatively low domain mobility, and associated the histidine substrate and docking domains with the kinase core, thus preventing catalytic activity. Together, these data provide an experimentally restrained model for the inhibited state of the core signaling unit and suggest that chemoreceptors indirectly sequester the kinase and substrate domains to limit histidine autophosphorylation.

Identification of a Kinase-Active CheA Conformation in Escherichia coli Chemoreceptor Signaling Complexes

Escherichia coli chemotaxis relies on control of the autophosphorylation activity of the histidine kinase CheA by transmembrane chemoreceptors. Core signaling units contain two receptor trimers of dimers, one CheA homodimer, and two monomeric CheW proteins that couple CheA activity to receptor control. Core signaling units appear to operate as two-state devices, with distinct kinase-on and kinase-off CheA output states whose structural nature is poorly understood. A recent all-atom molecular dynamic simulation of a receptor core unit revealed two alternative conformations, "dipped" and "undipped," for the ATP-binding CheA.P4 domain that could be related to kinase activity states. To explore possible signaling roles for the dipped CheA.P4 conformation, we created CheA mutants with amino acid replacements at residues (R265, E368, and D372) implicated in promoting the dipped conformation and examined their signaling consequences with in vivo Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based kinase assays. We used cysteine-directed in vivo cross-linking reporters for the dipped and undipped conformations to assess mutant proteins for these distinct CheA.P4 domain configurations. Phenotypic suppression analyses revealed functional interactions among the conformation-controlling residues. We found that structural interactions between R265, located at the N terminus of the CheA.P3 dimerization domain, and E368/D372 in the CheA.P4 domain played a critical role in stabilizing the dipped conformation and in producing kinase-on output. Charge reversal replacements at any of these residues abrogated the dipped cross-linking signal, CheA kinase activity, and chemotactic ability. We conclude that the dipped conformation of the CheA.P4 domain is critical to the kinase-active state in core signaling units.IMPORTANCE Regulation of CheA kinase in chemoreceptor arrays is critical for Escherichia coli chemotaxis. However, to date, little is known about the CheA conformations that lead to the kinase-on or kinase-off states. Here, we explore the signaling roles of a distinct conformation of the ATP-binding CheA.P4 domain identified by all-atom molecular dynamics simulation. Amino acid replacements at residues predicted to stabilize the so-called "dipped" CheA.P4 conformation abolished the kinase activity of CheA and its ability to support chemotaxis. Our findings indicate that the dipped conformation of the CheA.P4 domain is critical for reaching the kinase-active state in chemoreceptor signaling arrays.

Regulation of the chemotaxis histidine kinase CheA: A structural perspective

Bacteria sense and respond to their environment through a highly conserved assembly of transmembrane chemoreceptors (MCPs), the histidine kinase CheA, and the coupling protein CheW, hereafter termed "the chemosensory array". In recent years, great strides have been made in understanding the architecture of the chemosensory array and how this assembly engenders sensitive and cooperative responses. Nonetheless, a central outstanding question surrounds how receptors modulate the activity of the CheA kinase, the enzymatic output of the sensory system. With a focus on recent advances, we summarize the current understanding of array structure and function to comment on the molecular mechanism by which CheA, receptors and CheW generate the high sensitivity, gain and dynamic range emblematic of bacterial chemotaxis. The complexity of the chemosensory arrays has motivated investigation with many different approaches. In particular, structural methods, genetics, cellular activity assays, nanodisc technology and cryo-electron tomography have provided advances that bridge length scales and connect molecular mechanism to cellular function. Given the high degree of component integration in the chemosensory arrays, we ultimately aim to understand how such networked molecular interactions generate a whole that is truly greater than the sum of its parts. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Molecular biophysics of membranes and membrane proteins.

Signaling complexes control the chemotaxis kinase by altering its apparent rate constant of autophosphorylation

Autophosphorylating histidine kinase CheA is central to signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. The kinase donates its phosphoryl group to two response regulators, CheY that controls flagellar rotation and thus motility and CheB, crucial for sensory adaptation. As measured by coupled CheY phosphorylation, incorporation into signaling complexes activates the kinase ∼1000-fold and places it under control of chemoreceptors. By the same assay, receptors modulate kinase activity ∼100-fold as a function of receptor ligand occupancy and adaptational modification. These changes are the essence of chemotactic signaling. Yet, the enzymatic properties affected by incorporation into signaling complexes, by chemoreceptor ligand binding or by receptor adaptational modification are largely undefined. To investigate, we performed steady-state kinetic analysis of autophosphorylation using a liberated kinase phosphoryl-accepting domain, characterizing kinase alone, in isolated core signaling complexes and in small arrays of core complexes assembled in vitro with receptors contained in isolated native membranes. Autophosphorylation in signaling complexes was measured as a function of ligand occupancy and adaptational modification. Activation by incorporation into signaling complexes and modulation in complexes by ligand occupancy and adaptational modification occurred largely via changes in the apparent catalytic rate constant (k_cat ). Changes in the autophosphorylation k_cat accounted for most of the ∼1000-fold kinase activation in signaling complexes observed for coupled CheY phosphorylation, and the ∼100-fold inhibition by ligand occupancy or modulation by adaptational modification. Our results indicate no more than a minor role in kinase control for simple sequestration of the autophosphorylation substrate. Instead they indicate direct effects on the active site.

Conformational Transitions that Enable Histidine Kinase Autophosphorylation and Receptor Array Integration

During bacterial chemotaxis, transmembrane chemoreceptor arrays regulate autophosphorylation of the dimeric histidine kinase CheA. The five domains of CheA (P1-P5) each play a specific role in coupling receptor stimulation to CheA activity. Biochemical and X-ray scattering studies of thermostable CheA from Thermotoga maritima determine that the His-containing substrate domain (P1) is sequestered by interactions that depend upon P1 of the adjacent subunit. Non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs (but not ATP or ADP) release P1 from the protein core (domains P3P4P5) and increase its mobility. Detachment of both P1 domains or removal of one within a dimer increases net autophosphorylation substantially at physiological temperature (55°C). However, nearly all activity is lost without the dimerization domain (P3). The linker length between P1 and P3 dictates intersubunit (trans) versus intrasubunit (cis) autophosphorylation, with the trans reaction requiring a minimum length of 47 residues. A new crystal structure of the most active dimerization-plus-kinase unit (P3P4) reveals trans directing interactions between the tether connecting P3 to P2-P1 and the adjacent ATP-binding (P4) domain. The orientation of P4 relative to P3 in the P3P4 structure supports a planar CheA conformation that is required by membrane array models, and it suggests that the ATP lid of CheA may be poised to interact with receptors and coupling proteins. Collectively, these data suggest that the P1 domains are restrained in the off-state as a result of cross-subunit interactions. Perturbations at the nucleotide-binding pocket increase P1 mobility and access of the substrate His to P4-bound ATP.

Kinetic Analysis of a Globin-Coupled Histidine Kinase, AfGcHK: Effects of the Heme Iron Complex, Response Regulator, and Metal Cations on Autophosphorylation Activity

The globin-coupled histidine kinase, AfGcHK, is a part of the two-component signal transduction system from the soil bacterium Anaeromyxobacter sp. Fw109-5. Activation of its sensor domain significantly increases its autophosphorylation activity, which targets the His183 residue of its functional domain. The phosphate group of phosphorylated AfGcHK is then transferred to the cognate response regulator. We investigated the effects of selected variables on the autophosphorylation reaction's kinetics. The kcat values of the heme Fe(III)-OH(-), Fe(III)-cyanide, Fe(III)-imidazole, and Fe(II)-O2 bound active AfGcHK forms were 1.1-1.2 min(-1), and their Km(ATP) values were 18.9-35.4 μM. However, the active form bearing a CO-bound Fe(II) heme had a kcat of 1.0 min(-1) but a very high Km(ATP) value of 357 μM, suggesting that its active site structure differs strongly from the other active forms. The Fe(II) heme-bound inactive form had kcat and Km(ATP) values of 0.4 min(-1) and 78 μM, respectively, suggesting that its low activity reflects a low affinity for ATP relative to that of the Fe(III) form. The heme-free form exhibited low activity, with kcat and Km(ATP) values of 0.3 min(-1) and 33.6 μM, respectively, suggesting that the heme iron complex is essential for high catalytic activity. Overall, our results indicate that the coordination and oxidation state of the sensor domain heme iron profoundly affect the enzyme's catalytic activity because they modulate its ATP binding affinity and thus change its kcat/Km(ATP) value. The effects of the response regulator and different divalent metal cations on the autophosphorylation reaction are also discussed.

Identification of an anchor residue for CheA-CheY interactions in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli

Transfer of a phosphoryl group from autophosphorylated CheA (P-CheA) to CheY is an important step in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. This reaction involves CheY (i) binding to the P2 domain of P-CheA and then (ii) acquiring the phosphoryl group from the P1 domain. Crystal structures indicated numerous side chain interactions at the CheY-P2 binding interface. To investigate the individual contributions of the P2 side chains involved in these contacts, we analyzed the effects of eight alanine substitution mutations on CheA-CheY binding interactions. An F214A substitution in P2 caused ∼1,000-fold reduction in CheA-CheY binding affinity, while Ala substitutions at other P2 positions had small effects (E171A, E178A, and I216A) or no detectable effects (H181A, D202A, D207A, and C213A) on binding affinity. These results are discussed in relation to previous in silico predictions of hot-spot and anchor positions at the CheA-CheY interface. We also investigated the consequences of these mutations for chemotaxis signal transduction in living cells. CheA(F214A) was defective in mediating localization of CheY-YFP to the large clusters of signaling proteins that form at the poles of Escherichia coli cells, while the other CheA variants did not differ from wild-type (wt) CheA (CheA(wt)) in this regard. In our set of mutants, only CheA(F214A) exhibited a markedly diminished ability to support chemotaxis in motility agar assays. Surprisingly, however, in FRET assays that monitored receptor-regulated production of phospho-CheY, CheA(F214A) (and each of the other Ala substitution mutants) performed just as well as CheA(wt). Overall, our findings indicate that F214 serves as an anchor residue at the CheA-CheY interface and makes an important contribution to the binding energy in vitro and in vivo; however, loss of this contribution does not have a large negative effect on the overall ability of the signaling pathway to modulate P-CheY levels in response to chemoattractants.

The two active sites of Thermotoga maritima CheA dimers bind ATP with dramatically different affinities

CheA is a central component of the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway that allows prokaryotic cells to control their movements in response to environmental cues. This dimeric protein histidine kinase autophosphorylates via an intersubunit phosphorylation reaction in which each protomer of the dimer binds ATP, at an active site located in its P4 domain and then catalyzes transfer of the gamma-phosphoryl group of ATP to the His(45) side chain within the P1 domain of the trans protomer. Here we utilize the fluorescent nucleotide analogue TNP-ATP [2'(3')-O-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)adenosine 5'-triphosphate] to investigate the two ATP-binding sites of the Thermotoga maritima CheA dimer (TmCheA) and the single site of the isolated TmP4 domain (a monomer). We define the affinity of CheA for TNP nucleotides and, by competition, for unmodified ATP. The two ATP-binding sites of the TmCheA dimer exhibit dramatically different affinities for TNP-ATP (K(d1)(TNP) approximately 0.0016 muM and K(d2)(TNP) approximately 22 muM at 4 degrees C in the presence of Mg(2+)) as well as for ATP (K(d1)(ATP) approximately 6 muM and K(d2)(ATP) approximately 5000 muM at 4 degrees C in the presence of Mg(2+)) and in their ability to influence the fluorescence of bound TNP-ATP. The ATP-binding site of the isolated TmP4 domain interacts with ATP and TNP-ATP in a manner similar to that of the high-affinity site of the TmCheA dimer. These results suggest that the two active sites of TmCheA homodimers exhibit large differences in their interactions with ATP. We consider possible implications of these differences for the CheA autophosphorylation mechanism and for CheA function in bacterial cells.

Signal amplification in a lattice of coupled protein kinases

The bacterium Escherichia coli detects chemical attractants and repellents by means of a cluster of transmembrane receptors and associated molecules. Experiments have shown that this cluster amplifies the signal about 35-fold and current models attribute this amplification to cooperative interactions between neighbouring receptors. However, when applied to the mixed population of receptors of wild-type E. coli, these models lead to indiscriminate methylation of all receptor types rather than the selective methylation observed experimentally. In this paper, we propose that cooperative interactions occur not between receptors but in the underlying lattice of CheA molecules. In our model, each CheA molecule is stimulated by its neighbours via their flexible P1 domains and modulated by the ligand binding and methylation states of associated receptors. We test this idea with detailed, molecular-based stochastic simulations and show that it gives an accurate reproduction of signalling in this system, including ligand-specific adaptation.

Differential affinity and catalytic activity of CheZ in E. coli chemotaxis

Push–pull networks, in which two antagonistic enzymes control the activity of a messenger protein, are ubiquitous in signal transduction pathways. A classical example is the chemotaxis system of the bacterium Escherichia coli, in which the kinase CheA and the phosphatase CheZ regulate the phosphorylation level of the messenger protein CheY. Recent experiments suggest that both the kinase and the phosphatase are localized at the receptor cluster, and Vaknin and Berg recently demonstrated that the spatial distribution of the phosphatase can markedly affect the dose–response curves. We argue, using mathematical modeling, that the canonical model of the chemotaxis network cannot explain the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. We present a new model, in which a small fraction of the phosphatase is localized at the receptor cluster, while the remainder freely diffuses in the cytoplasm; moreover, the phosphatase at the cluster has a higher binding affinity for the messenger protein and a higher catalytic activity than the phosphatase in the cytoplasm. This model is consistent with a large body of experimental data and can explain many of the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. More generally, the combination of differential affinity and catalytic activity provides a generic mechanism for amplifying signals that could be exploited in other two-component signaling systems. If this model is correct, then a number of recent modeling studies, which aim to explain the chemotactic gain in terms of the activity of the receptor cluster, should be reconsidered.

In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, extra- and intracellular signals are often processed by biochemical networks in which two enzymes together control the activity of a messenger protein via opposite modification reactions. A well-known example is the chemotaxis network of Escherichia coli that controls the swimming behavior of the bacterium in response to chemical stimuli. Recent experiments suggest that the two counteracting enzymes in this network are colocalized at the receptor cluster, while experiments by Vaknin and Berg indicate that the spatial distribution of the enzymes by itself can markedly affect the response of the network. We argue using mathematical modeling that the most widely used model of the chemotaxis network is inconsistent with these experimental observations. We then present an alternative model in which part of one enzyme is colocalized with the other enzyme at the receptor cluster, while the remainder freely diffuses in the cytoplasm; moreover, the fraction at the cluster both binds more strongly to the messenger protein and modifies it faster. This model is consistent with a large number of experimental observations and provides a generic mechanism for amplifying signals.

Thermal domain motions of CheA kinase in solution: Disulfide trapping reveals the motional constraints leading to trans-autophosphorylation

The histidine kinase CheA is a central component of the bacterial chemotaxis signaling cluster, in which transmembrane receptors regulate CheA autokinase activity. CheA is a homodimer, and each of the two identical subunits possesses five different domains with distinct structures and functions. The free enzyme, like the receptor-bound enzyme, catalyzes a trans-autokinase reaction in which the catalytic domain (P4) of one subunit phosphorylates the substrate domain (P1) of the other subunit. Molecular analysis of CheA domain motions has important implications for the mechanism of CheA trans-autophosphorylation, for CheA assembly into the signaling cluster and for receptor regulation of CheA activity. In this initial study of the free CheA dimer, we employ disulfide trapping to analyze collisions between pairs of domains, thereby mapping out the ranges and kinetics of domain motions. A library of 33 functional single-cysteine CheA mutants, all retaining normal autokinase activity, is used to analyze intradimer collisions between symmetric domain pairs. The homodimeric structure of CheA ensures that each mutant contains a pair of symmetric, surface-exposed cysteine residues. Cysteine-cysteine collisions trapped by disulfide bond formation indicate that P1 is the most mobile CheA domain, but large amplitude P2, P4, and P5 domain motions are also detected. The mobility of P1 is further analyzed using a library of 17 functional dicysteine CheA mutants, wherein each mutant subunit possesses one cysteine at a fixed probe position on the P1 domain and a second cysteine on a different domain. The resulting CheA homodimers contain four cysteine residues; thus disulfide trapping yields multiple products that are identified by assignment methods. The findings reveal that the P1 substrate domain collides rapidly with residues on the P4' catalytic domain in the sister subunit, but no intrasubunit collisions are detected. This observation provides a direct, motional explanation for CheA trans-autophosphorylation, explains why the long linkers of the P1-P2 region do not become tangled in the dimer, and has important implications for other aspects of CheA function. Finally, a working model is proposed for the motional constraints that limit the P1 domain to the region of space near the P4' catalytic domain of the sister subunit.

Hysteretic and graded responses in bacterial two-component signal transduction

Bacterial two-component systems (TCS) are key signal transduction networks regulating global responses to environmental change. Environmental signals may modulate the phosphorylation state of sensor kinases (SK). The phosphorylated SK transfers the phosphate to its cognate response regulator (RR), which causes physiological response to the signal. Frequently, the SK is bifunctional and, when unphosphorylated, it is also capable of dephosphorylating the RR. The phosphatase activity may also be modulated by environmental signals. Using the EnvZ/OmpR system as an example, we constructed mathematical models to examine the steady-state and kinetic properties of the network. Mathematical modelling reveals that the TCS can show bistable behaviour for a given range of parameter values if unphosphorylated SK and RR form a dead-end complex that prevents SK autophosphorylation. Additionally, for bistability to exist the major dephosphorylation flux of the RR must not depend on the unphosphorylated SK. Structural modelling and published affinity studies suggest that the unphosphorylated SK EnvZ and the RR OmpR form a dead-end complex. However, bistability is not possible because the dephosphorylation of OmpR approximately P is mainly done by unphosphorylated EnvZ. The implications of this potential bistability in the design of the EnvZ/OmpR network and other TCS are discussed.

Why have serine/threonine/tyrosine kinases been evolutionarily selected in eukaryotic signaling cascades?

The signal transduction systems of eukaryotes are different from those of prokaryotes with respect to their structures and mechanisms. The main signal transduction system of prokaryotes called the two-component system (TCS) is a one-step phosphorelay system composed of a histidine kinase (HK) while the central signal transduction system of eukaryotes called the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade system (MCS) is a multi-step phosphorelay system composed of serine/threonine/tyrosine kinases (STYKs). The two signal transduction systems are also different in their transphosphorylation mechanisms. HK in the TCS transfers its own phosphate group to the response regulator protein while STYKs in the MCS phosphorylate other proteins using ATP. We were intrigued by the different dynamics resulting from such differences and wondered why STYKs instead of HKs have been evolutionarily selected in eukaryotic signaling cascades. In this paper, we compared the dynamical characteristics of two mathematical models which reflect such differences between the TCS and the MCS, and found that STYKs are more appropriate for cascade structures in eukaryotic signal transduction than HK with respect to the duration and settling time of response signals.

Analysis of CheA histidine phosphorylation and its influence on protein stability by high-resolution element and electrospray mass spectrometry

A combination of electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and element mass spectrometry (ICPMS) with phosphorus detection was used to characterize histidine phosphorylation (His-48) of the chemotaxis protein CheA quantitatively. The phosphorylation at His-48 was found to be responsible for a stabilization of the protein. For this investigation, the acceptor domain and the kinase domain of the bacterial chemotaxis protein CheA were recombinantly expressed as single proteins. Using in vitro kinase assay conditions, the acceptor domain CheA-H was phosphorylated by the kinase domain CheA-C. The degree of histidine phosphorylation was determined by nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry of intact CheA-H, and was found to be limited to a maximum value of approximately 50%. The site specificity of CheA-H phosphorylation was controlled by nanoESI-MS/MS of the [M + 16H](16+) ion of intact (pHis)-CheA-H and allowed localization of the pHis residue to the region between residues 32 and 86, containing candidates His-48 and His-67, for which His-48 phosphorylation has been described. Analysis of the tryptic digest of in vitro histidine-phosphorylated CheA-H by capillary chromatography coupled to ESI-MS and to ICPMS with phosphorus detection revealed a truncated (pHis)-CheA-H protein as the only phosphorus-containing analyte. Since the truncated (pHis)-CheA-H in the digest was found to exhibit a higher degree of phosphorylation than could be generated by in vitro phosphorylation without trypsin treatment, it is concluded that histidine phosphorylation at His-48 strongly interferes with structural properties of the CheA-H domain in particular with respect to proteolytic degradation by trypsin.

The positioning of cytoplasmic protein clusters in bacteria

Cell division is a carefully orchestrated procedure. Bacterial cells have intricate mechanisms to ensure that genetic material is copied, proofread, and accurately partitioned into daughter cells. Partitioning now appears to also occur for some cytoplasmic proteins. Previously, using chromosomal fluorescent protein fusions, we demonstrated that a subset of Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis proteins colocalize to a discrete region within the bacterial cytoplasm. Using TlpT-yellow fluorescent protein as a marker for the position of the cytoplasmic protein clusters, we show most cells contain either one cluster localized at mid-cell or two clusters at the one-fourth and three-fourths positions of cell length. The number and positioning of these protein clusters depend on a previously unrecognized bacterial protein positioning factor, PpfA, which has homology to bacterial type I DNA partitioning factors. These data suggest that there is a mechanism involved in partitioning some cytoplasmic proteins upon cell division that is analogous to a mechanism seen for plasmid and chromosomal DNA.

Changing cellular location of CheZ predicted by molecular simulations

In the chemotaxis pathway of the bacterium Escherichia coli, signals are carried from a cluster of receptors to the flagellar motors by the diffusion of the protein CheY-phosphate (CheYp) through the cytoplasm. A second protein, CheZ, which promotes dephosphorylation of CheYp, partially colocalizes with receptors in the plasma membrane. CheZ is normally dimeric in solution but has been suggested to associate into highly active oligomers in the presence of CheYp. A model is presented here and supported by Brownian dynamics simulations, which accounts for these and other experimental data: A minority component of the receptor cluster (dimers of CheA_short) nucleates CheZ oligomerization and CheZ molecules move from the cytoplasm to a bound state at the receptor cluster depending on the current level of cellular stimulation. The corresponding simulations suggest that dynamic CheZ localization will sharpen cellular responses to chemoeffectors, increase the range of detectable ligand concentrations, and make adaptation more precise and robust. The localization and activation of CheZ constitute a negative feedback loop that provides a second tier of adaptation to the system. Subtle adjustments of this kind are likely to be found in many other signaling pathways.

In order to function effectively, a living cell must not only synthesize the correct molecules but also put them in the correct place. Understanding how this positioning occurs, and what its consequences are, is a matter of great interest and concern to contemporary biologists. The author here proposes a novel mechanism that will enhance the ability of a bacterial cell to perform chemotaxis—the ability to swim toward sources of food or away from noxious substances. In this hypothesis, a key protein in the chemotaxis pathway moves dynamically between the membrane and the cytoplasm depending on the presence of attractants or repellents. This idea is explored and tested by means of detailed molecular simulations in which all of the relevant molecules are shown in their correct location in the cell. The simulations show that the proposed shift in location of the key molecule will improve the speed, range, and robustness of the cell's response. It seems likely that similar movements of proteins will occur in many other signaling pathways.

Refolding of Escherichia coli outer membrane protein F in detergent creates LPS-free trimers and asymmetric dimers

The Escherichia coli OmpF (outer-membrane protein F; matrix porin) is a homotrimeric beta-barrel and a member of the bacterial porin superfamily. It is the best characterized porin protein, but has resisted attempts to refold it efficiently in vitro. In the present paper, we report the discovery of detergent-based folding conditions, including dodecylglucoside, which can create pure samples of trimeric OmpF. Whereas outer membrane LPS (lipopolysaccharide) is clearly required for in vivo folding, the artificially refolded and LPS-free trimer has properties identical with those of the outer-membrane-derived form. Thus LPS is not required either for in vitro folding or for structural integrity. Dimeric forms of OmpF have been observed in vivo and are proposed to be folding intermediates. In vitro, dimers occur transiently in refolding of trimeric OmpF and, in the presence of dodecylmaltoside, pure dimer can be prepared. This form has less beta-structure by CD and shows lower thermal stability than the trimer. Study of these proteins at the single-molecule level is possible because each OmpF subunit forms a distinct ion channel. Whereas each trimer contains three channels of equal conductance, each dimer always contains two distinct channel sizes. This provides clear evidence that the two otherwise identical monomers adopt different structures in the dimer and indicates that the asymmetric interaction, characteristic of C3 symmetry, is formed at the dimer stage. This asymmetric dimer may be generally relevant to the folding of oligomeric proteins with odd numbers of subunits such as aspartate transcarbamoylase.

Metal bridges between the PhoQ sensor domain and the membrane regulate transmembrane signaling

Bacterial histidine kinases respond to environmental stimuli by transducing a signal from an extracytosolic sensor domain to a cytosolic catalytic domain. Among them, PhoQ promotes bacterial virulence and is tightly repressed by the divalent cations such as calcium and magnesium. We have determined the crystal structure of the PhoQ sensor domain from Salmonella typhimurium in the Ca2+-bound state, which reveals a highly negatively charged surface that is in close proximity to the inner membrane. This acidic surface binds at least three Ca2+, which mediate the PhoQ-membrane interaction. Mutagenesis analysis indicates that structural integrity at the membrane proximal region of the PhoQ sensor domain promotes metal-mediated repression. We propose that depletion or displacement of divalent cations leads to charge repulsion between PhoQ and the membrane, which initiates transmembrane signaling through a change in orientation between the PhoQ sensor domain and membrane. Therefore, both PhoQ and the membrane are required for extracytosolic sensing and transmembrane signaling.

Dynamic mechanism for the autophosphorylation of CheA histidine kinase: molecular dynamics simulations

The two-component system (TCS) is an important signal transduction component for most bacteria. This signaling pathway is mediated by histidine kinases via autophosphorylation between P1 and P4 domains. Taking chemotaxis protein CheA as a model of TCS, the autophosphorylation mechanism of the TCS histidine kinases has been investigated in this study by using a computational approach integrated homology modeling, ligand-protein docking, protein-protein docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Four nanosecond-scale MD simulations were performed on the free P4 domain, P4-ATP, P4-TNPATP, and P1-P4-ATP complexes, respectively. Upon its binding to the binding pocket of P4 with a folded conformation, ATP gradually extends to an open state with help from a water molecule. Meanwhile, ATP forms two hydrogen bonds with His413 and Lys494 at this state. Because of the lower energy of the folded conformations, ATP shrinks back to its folded conformations, leading to the rupture of the hydrogen bond between ATP and Lys494. Consequently, Lys494 moves away from the pocket entrance, resulting in an open of the ATP lid of P4. It is the open state of P4 that can bind tightly to P1, where the His45 of P1 occupies a favorable position for its autophosphorylation from ATP. This indicates that ATP is not only a phosphoryl group donor but also an activator for CheA phosphorylation. Accordingly, a mechanism of the autophosphorylation of CheA is proposed as that the ATP conformational switch triggers the opening of the ATP lid of P4, leading to P1 binding tightly, and subsequently autophosphorylation from ATP to P1.

Analysis of ATP binding to CheA containing tryptophan substitutions near the active site

Signal transduction in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli involves an autophosphorylating protein histidine kinase, CheA. At the active site of CheA, phenylalanine residues 455 and 459 occupy positions near the ATP-binding pocket, immediately adjacent to one of the hinge regions of a loop that undergoes an ATP-induced conformational change ("lid closure") that has been characterized previously in X-ray crystal structures [Bilwes et al. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 353-360]. We generated versions of CheA carrying F455W and F459W replacements and investigated whether the fluorescence properties of the introduced tryptophan side chains were affected by nucleotide binding in a manner that would provide a signal for investigating the dynamics of active site events, such as ATP binding and lid closure. Our results indicate that CheA(F455W) is useful in this regard, but CheA(F459W) is not. CheA(F455W) retained full catalytic activity and exhibited easily monitored fluorescence changes upon binding nucleotide: we observed a 25-30% decrease in CheA(F455W) fluorescence emission intensity at 330 nm upon binding ATP in the absence of Mg(2+); in the presence of Mg(2+), the emission spectrum of the CheA(F455W):ATP complex was red-shifted by 5 nm and exhibited an increased intensity (approximately 20% higher at 345 nm relative to that of uncomplexed CheA(F455W)). Different fluorescence changes were observed when two ATP analogues (ADPNP and ADPCP) were used instead of ATP and when Mn(2+) or Ca(2+) was used in place of Mg(2+). We exploited the fluorescence changes induced by Mg(2+)-ATP to explore the kinetics and mechanism of nucleotide binding by CheA(F455W). In the absence of Mg(2+), binding appears to involve a simple one-step equilibrium (k(assn) = 0.7 microM(-1) s(-1) and k(dissn) = 270 s(-1) at 4 degrees C). In the presence of Mg(2+), the binding mechanism involves at least two steps: (i) rapid, relatively weak binding followed by (ii) a rapid, reversible step (k(forward) = 300 s(-1) and k(reverse) =15 s(-1) at 4 degrees C) that enhanced the overall affinity of the complex and generated an increase in W455 fluorescence. This second step could reflect a conformational change at the CheA active site, such as lid closure. These results provide the first insight into the dynamics of nucleotide binding and substrate-induced conformational changes at the active site of a protein histidine kinase.

Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis

Motile bacteria respond to environmental cues to move to more favorable locations. The components of the chemotaxis signal transduction systems that mediate these responses are highly conserved among prokaryotes including both eubacterial and archael species. The best-studied system is that found in Escherichia coli. Attractant and repellant chemicals are sensed through their interactions with transmembrane chemoreceptor proteins that are localized in multimeric assemblies at one or both cell poles together with a histidine protein kinase, CheA, an SH3-like adaptor protein, CheW, and a phosphoprotein phosphatase, CheZ. These multimeric protein assemblies act to control the level of phosphorylation of a response regulator, CheY, which dictates flagellar motion. Bacterial chemotaxis is one of the most-understood signal transduction systems, and many biochemical and structural details of this system have been elucidated. This is an exciting field of study because the depth of knowledge now allows the detailed molecular mechanisms of transmembrane signaling and signal processing to be investigated.

Chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires an atypical histidine protein kinase

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory system comprising two classic CheAs, two atypical CheAs, and eight response regulators (six CheYs and two CheBs). The classic CheAs, CheA(1) and CheA(2), have similar domain structures to Escherichia coli CheA, whereas the atypical CheAs, CheA(3) and CheA(4), lack some of the domains found in E. coli CheA. CheA(2), CheA(3), and CheA(4) are all essential for chemotaxis. Here we demonstrate that CheA(3) and CheA(4) are both unable to undergo ATP-dependent autophosphorylation, however, CheA(4) is able to phosphorylate CheA(3). The in vitro kinetics of this phosphorylation reaction were consistent with a reaction mechanism in which CheA(3) associates with a CheA(4) dimer forming a complex, CheA(3)A(4). To the best of our knowledge, CheA(3)A(4) is the first characterized histidine protein kinase where the subunits are encoded by distinct genes. Selective phosphotransfer was observed from CheA(3)-P to the response regulators CheY(1), CheY(6), and CheB(2). Using phosphorylation site and kinase domain mutants of CheA we show that phosphosignaling involving CheA(2), CheA(3), and CheA(4) is essential for chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides. Interestingly, CheA(3) was not phosphorylated in vitro by CheA(1) or CheA(2), although CheA(1) and CheA(2) mutants with defective kinase domains were phosphorylated by CheA(4). Because in vivo CheA(3) and CheA(4) localize to the cytoplasmic chemotaxis cluster, while CheA(2) localizes to the polar chemotaxis cluster, it is likely that the physical separation of CheA(2) and CheA(4) prevents unwanted cross-talk between these CheAs.

Sensing and responding to diverse extracellular signals? Analysis of the sensor kinases and response regulators of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)

Streptomyces coelicolor is a Gram-positive soil bacterium that undergoes a complex developmental life cycle. The genome sequence of this organism was recently completed and has revealed the presence of over 60 sigma factors and a multitude of other transcriptional regulators, with a significant number of these being putative two-component signal transduction proteins. The authors have used the criteria established by Hoch and co-workers (Fabret et al., 1999, J Bacteriol 181, 1975-1983) to identify sensor kinase and response regulator genes encoded within the S. coelicolor genome. This analysis has revealed the presence of 84 sensor kinase genes, 67 of which lie adjacent to genes encoding response regulators. This strongly suggests that these paired genes encode two-component systems. In addition there are 13 orphan response regulators encoded in the genome, several of which have already been characterized and are implicated in development and antibiotic production, and 17 unpaired and as yet uncharacterized sensor kinases. This article attempts to infer useful information from sequence analysis and reviews what is currently known about the two-component systems, unpaired sensor kinases and orphan response regulators of S. coelicolor from both published reports and the authors' own unpublished data.

Phosphorylation and Binding Interactions of CheY Studied by Use of Badan-Labeled Protein†

In the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway of Escherichia coli, the response regulator protein CheY is phosphorylated by the receptor-coupled protein kinase CheA. Previous studies of CheY phosphorylation and CheY interactions with other proteins in the chemotaxis pathway have exploited the fluorescence properties of Trp(58), located immediately adjacent to the phosphorylation site of CheY (Asp(57)). Such studies can be complicated by the intrinsic fluorescence and absorbance properties of CheA and other proteins of interest. To circumvent these difficulties, we generated a derivative of CheY carrying a covalently attached fluorescent label that serves as a sensitive reporter of phosphorylation and binding events and that absorbs and emits light at wavelengths well removed from potential interference by other proteins. This labeled version of CheY has the (dimethylamino)naphthalene fluorophore from Badan [6-bromoacetyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene] attached to the thiol group of a cysteine introduced at position 17 of CheY by site-directed mutagenesis. Under phosphorylating conditions (or in the presence of beryllofluoride), the fluorescence emission of Badan-labeled CheY(M17C) exhibited an approximately 10 nm blue shift and an approximately 30% increase in signal intensity at 490 nm. The fluorescence of Badan-labeled CheY(M17C) also served as a sensitive reporter of CheY-CheA binding interactions, exhibiting an approximately 50% increase in emission intensity in the presence of saturating levels of CheA. Compared to wild-type CheY, Badan-labeled CheY exhibited reduced ability to autodephosphorylate and could not interact productively with the phosphatase CheZ. However, with respect to autophosphorylation and interactions with CheA, Badan-CheY performed identically to wild-type CheY, allowing us to explore CheA-CheY phosphotransfer kinetics and binding kinetics without interference from the fluorescence/absorbance properties of CheA and ATP. These results provide insights into CheY interactions with CheA, CheZ, and other components of the chemotaxis signaling pathway.

Chemotactic signaling by an Escherichia coli CheA mutant that lacks the binding domain for phosphoacceptor partners

CheA is a multidomain histidine kinase for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. CheA autophosphorylates through interaction of its N-terminal phosphorylation site domain (P1) with its central dimerization (P3) and ATP-binding (P4) domains. This activity is modulated through the C-terminal P5 domain, which couples CheA to chemoreceptor control. CheA phosphoryl groups are donated to two response regulators, CheB and CheY, to control swimming behavior. The phosphorylated forms of CheB and CheY turn over rapidly, enabling receptor signaling complexes to elicit fast behavioral responses by regulating the production and transmission of phosphoryl groups from CheA. To promote rapid phosphotransfer reactions, CheA contains a phosphoacceptor-binding domain (P2) that serves to increase CheB and CheY concentrations in the vicinity of the adjacent P1 phosphodonor domain. To determine whether the P2 domain is crucial to CheA's signaling specificity, we constructed CheADeltaP2 deletion mutants and examined their signaling properties in vitro and in vivo. We found that CheADeltaP2 autophosphorylated and responded to receptor control normally but had reduced rates of phosphotransfer to CheB and CheY. This defect lowered the frequency of tumbling episodes during swimming and impaired chemotactic ability. However, expression of additional P1 domains in the CheADeltaP2 mutant raised tumbling frequency, presumably by buffering the irreversible loss of CheADeltaP2-generated phosphoryl groups from CheB and CheY, and greatly improved its chemotactic ability. These findings suggest that P2 is not crucial for CheA signaling specificity and that the principal determinants that favor appropriate phosphoacceptor partners, or exclude inappropriate ones, most likely reside in the P1 domain.

Distributed subunit interactions in CheA contribute to dimer stability: a sedimentation equilibrium study

The structural domains of the Escherichia coli CheA protein resemble 'beads on a string', since the N-terminal phosphate-accepting (P) domain is joined to the CheY/CheB-binding (B) domain through a flexible linker, and the B domain is in turn joined to the C-terminal dimerization/catalytic/regulatory domains by a second intervening linker. Dimerization occurs primarily via interactions between two dimerization domains, which is required for CheA trans-autophosphorylation. In this study, sedimentation equilibrium was used to demonstrate significant subunit interactions at secondary sites in the two naturally occurring (full-length and short) forms of CheA (CheA(1-654) or CheA(L), and CheA(98-654) or CheA(S)) by contrasting the dimerization of CheA(L) and CheA(S) to CheA(T), an engineered form that lacked the P domain entirely. The estimated dimer dissociation constant (K(1,2)) for CheA(T) (3.1 microM) was weaker than K(1,2) for CheA(L) (0.49 microM), which was attributed to the P domain-catalytic domain interactions that were present in CheA(L) but not CheA(T). In contrast, CheA(S) dimerization was unexpectedly stronger (K(1,2) approximately 20 nM), which arose through interactions between two P domain remnants in the CheA(S) dimer. This conclusion was supported by the results of sedimentation equilibrium experiments conducted with P domains and P domain remnants expressed in the absence of the dimerization/catalytic/regulatory domains. The P domain remnant had a measurable tendency to self-associate; the full-length P domain did not. Hydrophobic forces probably drive this interaction, since hydrophobic amino acids buried in the intact P domain are solvent-exposed in CheA(S). Also, the nascent N-terminus of CheA(S) bound to the phosphatase (CheZ) more effectively, a conclusion based on the demonstrably greater ability of the P domain remnant to co-sediment CheZ, compared to the intact P domain.

Association and dissociation kinetics for CheY interacting with the P2 domain of CheA

The chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli makes use of an extended two-component sensory response pathway in which CheA, an autophosphorylating protein histidine kinase (PHK) rapidly passes its phosphoryl group to CheY, a phospho-accepting response regulator protein (RR). The CheA-->CheY phospho-transfer reaction is 100-1000 times faster than the His-->Asp phospho-relays that operate in other (non-chemotaxis) two-component regulatory systems, suggesting that CheA and CheY have unique features that enhance His-->Asp phospho-transfer kinetics. One such feature could be the P2 domain of CheA. P2 encompasses a binding site for CheY, but an analogous RR-binding domain is not found in other PHKs. In previous work, we removed P2 from CheA, and this decreased the catalytic efficiency of CheA-->CheY phospho-transfer by a factor of 50-100. Here we examined the kinetics of the binding interactions between CheY and P2. The rapid association reaction (k(assn) approximately 10(8)M(-1)s(-1) at 25 degrees C and micro=0.03 M) exhibited a simple first-order dependence on P2 concentration and appeared to be largely diffusion-limited. Ionic strength (micro) had a moderate effect on k(assn) in a manner predictable based on the calculated electrostatic interaction energy of the protein binding surfaces and the expected Debye-Hückel shielding. The speed of binding reflects, in part, electrostatic interactions, but there is also an important contribution from the inherent plasticity of the complex and the resulting flexibility that this allows during the process of complex formation. Our results support the idea that the P2 domain of CheA contributes to the overall speed of phospho-transfer by promoting rapid association between CheY and CheA. However, this alone does not account for the ability of the chemotaxis system to operate much more rapidly than other two-component systems: k(cat) differences indicate that CheA and CheY also achieve the chemical events of phospho-transfer more rapidly than do PHK-RR pairs of slower systems.

Spontaneous subunit exchange and biochemical evidence for trans-autophosphorylation in a dimer of Escherichia coli histidine kinase (EnvZ)

The EnvZ/OmpR histidyl-aspartyl phosphorelay (HAP) system in Escherichia coli regulates the expression of ompF and ompC, the major outer membrane porin genes, in response to environmental osmolarity changes. Here, we report that dimers of EnvZc, the cytoplasmic domain of EnvZ, undergo spontaneous subunit exchange in solution. By introducing a cysteine substitution (S260C) in the dimerization domain of EnvZc, we were able to crosslink the two subunits in a dimer and trap the heterodimer formed between two different mutant EnvZc. By using a complementing system with two autophosphorylation-defective EnvZc mutants, one containing the H243V mutation at the autophosphorylation site and the other containing the G405A mutation in the ATP-binding domain, we demonstrated that an EnvZc(G405A) subunit can be phosphorylated by an EnvZc(H243V) subunit only when a heterodimer is formed. The rate of subunit exchange is concentration-dependent, with higher rates at higher concentrations of protein. The disulfide-crosslinked EnvZc(G405A) homodimer could not be phosphorylated by EnvZc(H243V), since the heterodimer formation between the two mutant proteins was blocked, indicating that autophosphorylation cannot occur by dimer-dimer interaction. By using MBP-deltaL-EnvZc(S260C) fusion protein (deltaL: the linker region, spanning residues 180-222, was deleted), it was found that in the disulfide-crosslinked MBP-deltaL-EnvZc(S260C)/deltaL-EnvZc(S260C/G405A) heterodimer, only the deltaL-EnvZc(S260C/G405A) subunit was phosphorylated but not the MBP-deltaL-EnvZc(S260C) subunit. Together, the present results provide biochemical evidence that EnvZ autophosphorylation occurs in trans and only within an EnvZ dimer.

Active site mutations in CheA, the signal-transducing protein kinase of the chemotaxis system in Escherichia coli

We investigated the functional roles of putative active site residues in Escherichia coli CheA by generating nine site-directed mutants, purifying the mutant proteins, and quantifying the effects of those mutations on autokinase activity and binding affinity for ATP. We designed these mutations to alter key positions in sequence motifs conserved in the protein histidine kinase family, including the N box (H376 and N380), the G1 box (D420 and G422), the F box (F455 and F459), the G2 box (G470, G472, and G474), and the "GT block" (T499), a motif identified by comparison of CheA to members of the GHL family of ATPases. Four of the mutant CheA proteins exhibited no detectable autokinase activity (Kin(-)). Of these, three (N380D, D420N, and G422A) exhibited moderate decreases in their affinities for ATP in the presence or absence of Mg(2+). The other Kin(-) mutant (G470A/G472A/G474A) exhibited wild-type affinity for ATP in the absence of Mg(2+), but reduced affinity (relative to that of wild-type CheA) in the presence of Mg(2+). The other five mutants (Kin(+)) autophosphorylated at rates slower than that exhibited by wild-type CheA. Of these, three mutants (H376Q, D420E, and F455Y/F459Y) exhibited severely reduced k(cat) values, but preserved K(M)(ATP) and K(d)(ATP) values close to those of wild-type CheA. Two mutants (T499S and T499A) exhibited only small effects on k(cat) and K(M)(ATP). Overall, these results suggest that conserved residues in the N box, G1 box, G2 box, and F box contribute to the ATP binding site and autokinase active site in CheA, while the GT block makes little, if any, contribution. We discuss the effects of specific mutations in relation to the three-dimensional structure of CheA and to binding interactions that contribute to the stability of the complex between CheA and Mg(2+)-bound ATP in both the ground state and the transition state for the CheA autophosphorylation reaction.

Crystal structure of the CheA histidine phosphotransfer domain that mediates response regulator phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis

The x-ray crystal structure of the P1 or H domain of the Salmonella CheA protein has been solved at 2.1-A resolution. The structure is composed of an up-down up-down four-helix bundle that is typical of histidine phosphotransfer or HPt domains such as Escherichia coli ArcB(C) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ypd1. Loop regions and additional structural features distinguish all three proteins. The CheA domain has an additional C-terminal helix that lies over the surface formed by the C and D helices. The phosphoaccepting His-48 is located at a solvent-exposed position in the middle of the B helix where it is surrounded by several residues that are characteristic of other HPt domains. Mutagenesis studies indicate that conserved glutamate and lysine residues that are part of a hydrogen-bond network with His-48 are essential for the ATP-dependent phosphorylation reaction but not for the phosphotransfer reaction with CheY. These results suggest that the CheA-P1 domain may serve as a good model for understanding the general function of HPt domains in complex two-component phosphorelay systems.

Rapid phosphotransfer to CheY from a CheA protein lacking the CheY-binding domain

The histidine protein kinase CheA plays a central role in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. Autophosphorylated CheA passes its phosphoryl group to CheY very rapidly (k(cat) approximately 750 s(-)(1)). Phospho-CheY in turn influences the direction of flagellar rotation. The autophosphorylation site of CheA (His(48)) resides in its N-terminal P1 domain. The adjacent P2 domain provides a high-affinity binding site for CheY, which might facilitate the phosphotransfer reaction by tethering CheY in close proximity to the phosphodonor located in P1. To explore the contribution of P2 to the CheA --> CheY phosphotransfer reaction in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis system, we examined the transfer kinetics of a mutant CheA protein (CheADeltaP2) in which the 98 amino acid P2 domain had been replaced with an 11 amino acid linker. We used rapid-quench and stopped-flow fluorescence experiments to monitor phosphotransfer to CheY from phosphorylated wild-type CheA and from phosphorylated CheADeltaP2. The CheADeltaP2 reaction rates were significantly slower and the K(m) value was markedly higher than the corresponding values for wild-type CheA. These results indicate that binding of CheY to the P2 domain of CheA indeed contributes to the rapid kinetics of phosphotransfer. Although phosphotransfer was slower with CheADeltaP2 (k(cat)/K(m) approximately 1.5 x 10(6) M(-)(1) s(-)(1)) than with wild-type CheA (k(cat)/K(m) approximately 10(8) M(-)(1) s(-)(1)), it was still orders of magnitude faster than the kinetics of CheY phosphorylation by phosphoimidazole and other small molecule phosphodonors (k(cat)/K(m) approximately 5-50 M(-)(1) s(-)(1)). We conclude that the P1 domain of CheA also makes significant contributions to phosphotransfer rates in chemotactic signaling.

Asymmetry in the autophosphorylation of the two-component regulatory system transmitter protein nitrogen regulator II of Escherichia coli

Autophosphorylation of the homodimeric two-component system transmitter protein nitrogen regulator II (NRII; also NtrB) of Escherichia coli is the first step in the activation of nitrogen-regulated (Ntr) gene transcription. We show that the autophosphorylation of NRII was asymmetric, with phosphorylation of the first and second subunits of the dimer displaying different equilibria (under our experimental conditions K(1) approximately 0. 345, K(2) approximately 0.0044). Phosphorylation of both subunits of NRII was rapid, but the very rapid reversal of the phosphorylation of the second subunit was responsible for the equilibrium position of the reaction. Complete phosphorylation of NRII was only observed under conditions where ADP, a product of the autophosphorylation reaction, was removed by an enzymatic system. Purified, doubly phosphorylated NRII (NRII approximately P(2)) was stable in the absence of nucleotides at 0 degrees C but was dephosphorylated to the hemiphosphorylated form at 37 degrees C. In the presence of a low concentration of ADP, half of the phosphoryl groups from NRII approximately P(2) were rapidly dephosphorylated, while the remaining phosphoryl groups were slowly dephosphorylated. Experiments with heterodimers containing wild-type and mutant, nonphosphorylatable subunits suggested that the asymmetry of NRII autophosphorylation was not preexisting but resulted from the autophosphorylation of one subunit.

A receptor scaffold mediates stimulus-response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis

The mechanism of stimulus-response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis has emerged as a paradigm for understanding general features of intracellular signal transduction both in bacterial and eukaryotic cells. Until recently it was thought that the mechanism involved reversible stochastic interactions between dimeric receptors freely diffusing in the cytoplasmic membrane and several soluble signal transduction proteins within the cytoplasm. Recent results have shown that this view is an oversimplification. The receptors and most of the signal transduction proteins are organized together in a higher ordered structure at one pole of the bacterial cell. The scaffolding network within this structure appears to be composed of C-terminal alpha-helical extensions of the membrane chemoreceptor proteins held together in a lattice by tandem SH3-like domains. Results suggest that stimuli are detected through the perturbations they induce in scaffolding architecture.

The histidine protein kinase superfamily

Signal transduction in microorganisms and plants is often mediated by His-Asp phosphorelay systems. Two conserved families of proteins are centrally involved: histidine protein kinases and phospho-aspartyl response regulators. The kinases generally function in association with sensory elements that regulate their activities in response to environmental signals. A sequence analysis with 348 histidine kinase domains reveals that this family consists of distinct subgroups. A comparative sequence analysis with 298 available receiver domain sequences of cognate response regulators demonstrates a significant correlation between kinase and regulator subfamilies. These findings suggest that different subclasses of His-Asp phosphorelay systems have evolved independently of one another.

The RdeA-RegA system, a eukaryotic phospho-relay controlling cAMP breakdown

The regA and rdeA gene products of Dictyostelium are involved in the regulation of cAMP signaling. The response regulator, RegA, is composed of an N-terminal receiver domain linked to a C-terminal cAMP-phosphodiesterase domain. RdeA may be a phospho-transfer protein that supplies phosphates to RegA. We show genetically that phospho-RegA is the activated form of the enzyme in vivo, in that the predicted site of aspartate phosphorylation is required for full activity. We show biochemically that RdeA and RegA communicate, as evidenced by phospho-transfer between the two proteins in vitro. Phospho-transfer is dependent on the presumed phospho-accepting amino acids, histidine 65 of RdeA and aspartate 212 of RegA, and occurs in both directions. Phosphorylation of RegA by a heterologous phospho-donor protein activates RegA phosphodiesterase activity at least 20-fold. Our results suggest that the histidine phosphotransfer protein, RdeA, and the response regulator, RegA, constitute two essential elements in a eukaryotic His-Asp phospho-relay network that regulates Dictyostelium development and fruiting body maturation.

Signal transduction: Gyrating protein kinases

Recently determined structures have linked histidine kinases with class II topoisomerases, the DNA repair enzyme MutL and the molecular chaperone Hsp90. This surprising finding may foreshadow a shift in our understanding of energy coupling mechanisms in signal transduction networks.

Mechanism of CheA protein kinase activation in receptor signaling complexes

The chemotaxis receptor for aspartate, Tar, generates responses by regulating the activity of an associated histidine kinase, CheA. Tar is composed of an extracellular sensory domain connected by a transmembrane sequence to a cytoplasmic signaling domain. The cytoplasmic domain fused to a leucine zipper dimerization domain forms soluble active ternary complexes with CheA and an adapter protein, CheW. The kinetics of kinase activity within these complexes compared to CheA alone indicate approximately a 50% decrease in the KM for ATP and a 100-fold increase in the Vmax. A truncated CheA construct that lacks the phosphoaccepting H-domain and the CheY/CheB-binding domain forms an activated ternary complex that is similar to the one formed by the full-length CheA protein. The Vmax of H-domain phosphorylation by this complex is enhanced approximately 60-fold, the KM for ATP decreased to 50%, and the KM for H-domain decreased to 20% of the values obtained with the same CheA construct in the absence of receptor and CheW. The kinetic data support a mechanism of CheA regulation that involves perturbation of an equilibrium between an inactive form where the H-domain is loosely bound and an active form where the H-domain is tightly associated with the CheA active site and properly positioned for phosphotransfer. The data are consistent with an asymmetric mechanism of CheA activation [Levit, M., Liu, I., Surette, M. G., and Stock, J. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32057-32063] wherein only one phosphoaccepting domain of CheA at a time can interact with an active center within a CheA dimer.

pH sensing in bacterial chemotaxis

Bacteria are able to sense a broad range of chemical and energetic stimuli and modulate their swimming behaviour to migrate to more favourable environments. Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by a two-component system composed of a protein histidine kinase, CheA, and a response regulator, CheY. The phosphorylated response regulator, P approximately CheY, binds to a protein at the flagellar motor, FliM, to cause reversals in flagellar motor rotation. The level of P approximately CheY is controlled by the activity of the kinase CheA, which is in turn regulated by membrane receptors at the cell surface. Membrane receptors such as the aspartate receptor, Tar, are composed of two distinct regions: an extracellular sensing domain that binds stimulatory ligands, aspartate in the case of Tar; and an intracellular signalling domain that forms a complex with the protein kinase CheA. What is the mechanism of transmembrane signalling? How does aspartate binding to the sensing domain at the outside surface of the membrane translate into a change in kinase activity at the membrane cytosol interface? Recent results suggest that the mechanism depends on perturbations in lateral packing within an extensive array of receptors localized to patches at the cell poles. Receptor patching appears to depend on higher-order associations with the kinase CheA as well as an adaptor protein, CheW. It is difficult to assess the locus of pH effects within the context of even a simple signal transduction system like that involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Previous results with mutant strains have indicated that the serine receptor, Tsr, is critical for pH sensing, but in vitro results do not support such a straightforward interpretation of the genetic data.

Structural analysis of bacterial chemotaxis proteins: components of a dynamic signaling system

Most motile bacteria are capable of directing their movement in response to chemical gradients, a behavior known as chemotaxis. The signal transduction system that mediates chemotaxis in enteric bacteria consists of a set of six cytoplasmic proteins that couple stimuli sensed by a family of transmembrane receptors to behavioral responses generated by the flagellar motors. Signal transduction occurs via a phosphotransfer pathway involving a histidine protein kinase, CheA, and a response regulator protein, CheY, that in its phosphorylated state, modulates the direction of flagellar rotation. Two auxiliary proteins, CheW and CheZ, and two receptor modification enzymes, methylesterase CheB and methyltransferase CheR, influence the flux of phosphoryl groups within this central pathway. This paper focuses on structural characteristics of the four signaling proteins (CheA, CheY, CheB, and CheR) for which NMR or x-ray crystal structures have been determined. The proteins are examined with respect to their signaling activities that involve reversible protein modifications and transient assembly of macromolecular complexes. A variety of data suggest conformational flexibility of these proteins, a feature consistent with their multiple roles in a dynamic signaling pathway.

Chemotaxis receptors: a progress report on structure and function

Recent biochemical and structural studies have provided many new insights into the structure and function of bacterial chemoreceptors. Aspects of their ligand binding, conformational changes, and interactions with other members of the signaling pathway are being defined at the structural level. It is anticipated that the combined effort will soon provide a detailed, unified view of an entire response system.

TNP-ATP and TNP-ADP as probes of the nucleotide binding site of CheA, the histidine protein kinase in the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway of Escherichia coli

The interaction of CheA with ATP has important consequences in the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway of Escherichia coli. This interaction results in autophosphorylation of CheA, a histidine protein kinase. Autophosphorylation of CheA sets in motion a chain of biochemical events that enables the chemotaxis receptor proteins to communicate with the flagellar motors. As a result of this communication, CheA allows the receptors to control the cell swimming pattern in response to gradients of attractant and repellent chemicals. To probe CheA interactions with ATP, we investigated the interaction of CheA with the fluorescent nucleotide analogues TNP-ATP [2'(3')-O-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)adenosine 5'-triphosphate] and TNP-ADP. Spectroscopic studies indicated that CheA bound TNP-ATP and TNP-ADP with high affinity (micromolar Kd values) and caused a marked enhancement of the fluorescence of the TNP moiety of these modified nucleotides. Analysis of titration experiments indicated a binding stoichiometry of two molecules of TNP-ATP (TNP-ADP) per CheA dimer and suggested that the two binding sites on the CheA dimer operate independently. Binding of TNP-ATP to CheA was inhibited by ATP, and analysis of this inhibition indicated that the CheA dimer binds 2 molecules of ATP. Competition experiments also indicated that CheA binds TNP-ATP considerably more tightly than it binds unmodified ATP. Binding of TNP-ADP to CheA was inhibited by ADP in a similar manner. TNP-ATP was not a substrate for CheA and served as a potent inhibitor of CheA autophosphorylation (Ki < 1 microM). The glycine-rich regions (G1 and G2) of CheA and other histidine protein kinases have been presumed to play important roles in ATP binding and/or catalysis of CheA autophosphorylation, although few experimental tests of these functional assignments have been made. Here, we demonstrate that a CheA mutant protein with Gly-->Ala substitutions in G1 and G2 has a markedly reduced affinity for ATP and ADP, as measured by Hummel-Dreyer chromatography. This mutant protein also bound TNP-ATP and TNP-ADP very poorly and had no detectable autokinase activity. Surprisingly, a distinct single-site substitution in G2 (Gly470-->Lys) had no observable effect on the affinity of CheA for ATP and ADP, despite the fact that it rendered CheA completely inactive as an autokinase. This mutant protein also bound TNP-ATP and TNP-ADP with affinities and stoichiometries that were indistinguishable from those observed with wild-type CheA. These results provide some preliminary insight into the possible functional roles of G1 and G2, and they suggest that TNP-nucleotides are useful tools for exploring the effects of additional mutations on the active site of CheA.

Signal transduction in bacteria: molecular mechanisms of stimulus-response coupling

In bacteria, adaptive responses to changing environmental conditions are mediated by signal transduction systems that involve modular protein domains. Despite great diversity in the integration of domains into different systems, studies of individual components have revealed molecular strategies that are widely applicable. Studies of receptors have advanced our understanding of how information is transmitted across membranes, the determination of three-dimensional structures of domains of histidine protein kinase domains and response regulator proteins has begun to reveal the molecular basis of signaling via two-component phosphoryltransfer pathways, and the description of 'eukaryotic-like' protein domains involved in bacterial signaling has emphasized the universality of intracellular signaling mechanisms.

Synergistic kinetic interactions between components of the phosphorelay controlling sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

The four individual phosphotransfer steps in the multicomponent phosphorelay system controlling sporulation in Bacillus subtilis have been characterized kinetically using highly purified samples of the individual protein components in vitro. The autophosphorylation of KinA is the initial occurrence, and a divalent metal ion is required. KinA-mediated phosphotransfer, which displays a 57,000-fold preference (kcat/Km) for catalysis of Spo0F-P formation relative to Spo0A-P formation, is shown to proceed via a hybrid ping-pong/sequential mechanism with pronounced (> or = 40-fold) substrate synergism by Spo0F of KinA autophosphorylation. In addition, evidence is presented for formation of an abortive KinA.Spo0F complex. Kinetic parameters derived for Spo0F-P and Spo0A as substrates for Spo0B, the second phosphotransferase in the phosphorelay chain, indicate that Spo0B-mediated production of Spo0A-P is 1.1-million-fold more efficient (kcat/KSpo0A) than the direct KinA-mediated process. A rationale is presented for a four component cascade as the means for controlling sporulation, which focuses on the utility of synergistic interactions among the phosphorelay components that may be modulated by environmental stimuli.

Characterization of recombinant phytochrome from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis

The complete sequence of the Synechocystis chromosome has revealed a phytochrome-like sequence that yielded an authentic phytochrome when overexpressed in Escherichia coli. In this paper we describe this recombinant Synechocystis phytochrome in more detail. Islands of strong similarity to plant phytochromes were found throughout the cyanobacterial sequence whereas C-terminal homologies identify it as a likely sensory histidine kinase, a family to which plant phytochromes are related. An approximately 300 residue portion that is important for plant phytochrome function is missing from the Synechocystis sequence, immediately in front of the putative kinase region. The recombinant apoprotein is soluble and can easily be purified to homogeneity by affinity chromatography. Phycocyanobilin and similar tetrapyrroles are covalently attached within seconds, an autocatalytic process followed by slow conformational changes culminating in red-absorbing phytochrome formation. Spectral absorbance characteristics are remarkably similar to those of plant phytochromes, although the conformation of the chromophore is likely to be more helical in the Synechocystis phytochrome. According to size-exclusion chromatography the native recombinant apoproteins and holoproteins elute predominantly as 115- and 170-kDa species, respectively. Both tend to form dimers in vitro and aggregate under low salt conditions. Nevertheless, the purity and solubility of the recombinant gene product make it a most attractive model for molecular studies of phytochrome, including x-ray crystallography.

A fragment liberated from the Escherichia coli CheA kinase that blocks stimulatory, but not inhibitory, chemoreceptor signaling

CheA, a cytoplasmic histidine autokinase, in conjunction with the CheW coupling protein, forms stable ternary complexes with the cytoplasmic signaling domains of transmembrane chemoreceptors. These signaling complexes induce chemotactic movements by stimulating or inhibiting CheA autophosphorylation activity in response to chemoeffector stimuli. To explore the mechanisms of CheA control by chemoreceptor signaling complexes, we examined the ability of various CheA fragments to interfere with receptor coupling control of CheA. CheA[250-654], a fragment carrying the catalytic domain and an adjacent C-terminal segment previously implicated in stimulatory control of CheA activity, interfered with the production of clockwise flagellar rotation and with chemotactic ability in wild-type cells. Epistasis tests indicated that CheA[250-654] blocked clockwise rotation by disrupting stimulatory coupling of CheA to receptors. In vitro coupling assays confirmed that a stoichiometric excess of CheA[250-654] fragments could exclude CheA from stimulatory receptor complexes, most likely by competing for CheW binding. However, CheA[250-654] fragments, even in vast excess, did not block receptor-mediated inhibition of CheA, suggesting that CheA[250-654] lacks an inhibitory contact site present in native CheA. This inhibitory target is most likely in the N-terminal P1 domain, which contains His-48, the site of autophosphorylation. These findings suggest a simple allosteric model of CheA control by ternary signaling complexes in which the receptor signaling domain conformationally regulates the interaction between the substrate and catalytic domains of CheA.

The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes

The chemosensory pathway of bacterial chemotaxis has become a paradigm for the two-component superfamily of receptor-regulated phosphorylation pathways. This simple pathway illustrates many of the fundamental principles and unanswered questions in the field of signaling biology. A molecular description of pathway function has progressed rapidly because it is accessible to diverse structural, biochemical, and genetic approaches. As a result, structures are emerging for most of the pathway elements, biochemical studies are elucidating the mechanisms of key signaling events, and genetic methods are revealing the intermolecular interactions that transmit information between components. Recent advances include (a) the first molecular picture of a conformational transmembrane signal in a cell surface receptor, (b) four new structures of kinase domains and adaptation enzymes, and (c) significant new insights into the mechanisms of receptor-mediated kinase regulation, receptor adaptation, and the phospho-activation of signaling proteins. Overall, the chemosensory pathway and the propulsion system it regulates provide an ideal system in which to probe molecular principles underlying complex cellular signaling and behavior.