Differential activity of progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors on mouse mammary tumor virus templates differing in chromatin structure

Beyond the heterodimer model for mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor interactions in nuclei and at DNA

Glucocorticoid (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) are believed to classically bind DNA as homodimers or MR-GR heterodimers to influence gene regulation in response to pulsatile basal or stress-evoked glucocorticoid secretion. Pulsed corticosterone presentation reveals MR and GR co-occupy DNA only at the peaks of glucocorticoid oscillations, allowing interaction. GR DNA occupancy was pulsatile, while MR DNA occupancy was prolonged through the inter-pulse interval. In mouse mammary 3617 cells MR-GR interacted in the nucleus and at a chromatin-associated DNA binding site. Interactions occurred irrespective of ligand type and receptors formed complexes of higher order than heterodimers. We also detected MR-GR interactions ex-vivo in rat hippocampus. An expanded range of MR-GR interactions predicts structural allostery allowing a variety of transcriptional outcomes and is applicable to the multiple tissue types that co-express both receptors in the same cells whether activated by the same or different hormones.

Biochemical analyses of nuclear receptor-dependent transcription with chromatin templates

Chromatin, the physiological template for transcription, plays important roles in gene regulation by nuclear receptors (NRs). It can (1) restrict the binding of NRs or the transcriptional machinery to their genomic targets, (2) serve as a target of regulatory posttranslational modifications by NR coregulator proteins with histone-directed enzymatic activities, and (3) function as a binding scaffold for a variety of transcription-related proteins. The advent of in vitro or "cell-free" systems that accurately recapitulate ligand-dependent transcription by NRs with chromatin templates has allowed detailed analyses of these processes. Biochemical studies have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms of gene regulation, including the role of ligands, coregulators, and nucleosome remodeling. In addition, they have provided new insights about the dynamics of NR-mediated transcription. This chapter reviews the current methodologies for assembling, transcribing, and analyzing chromatin in vitro, as well as the new information that has been gained from these studies.

Immunohistochemical labelling of steroid receptors in normal and malignant human endometrium

For several years it was generally believed that only a single estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) existed. However, the discovery of a new ER (ERbeta) with specificity for estrogens has induced new insights in the estrogen signalling system. Moreover, PR is expressed as two major isoforms, PR-A and PR-B that arise from alternative transcriptional starting sites within the same gene. Although PR-A and PR-B were thought to occur in similar amounts, it is now clear that they are differentially expressed and thus have distinct functions in several human tissues, including human endometrium. The ER and PR expression and distribution pattern might play an important role in normal endometrial function and pathogenesis and the expression and relationship of the two distinct ER's and PR's could be of essential clinical implications. Moreover, the imbalance in ERalpha/ERbeta expression and the PR-A/PR-B ratio might play an important role in endometrial transition and subsequently influence endometrial pathogenesis. The knowledge of the pattern of steroid receptors in human endometrial tissue is of extreme importance, since it might start a new field in hormone therapy of endometrial cancer.

Dynamic access of the glucocorticoid receptor to response elements in chromatin

Transcriptional activation as a rate-limiting step of gene expression is often triggered by an environmental stimulus that is transmitted through a signaling cascade to specific transcription factors. Transcription factors must then find appropriate target genes in the context of chromatin. Subsequent modulation of local chromatin domains is now recognized as a major mechanism of gene regulation. The interactions of transcription factors with chromatin structures have recently been observed to be highly dynamic, with residence times measured in seconds. Thus, the concept of static, multi-protein complexes forming at regulatory elements in the genome has been replaced by a new paradigm that envisages rapid and continuous exchange events with the template. These highly dynamic interactions are a property of both DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions and are inherent to every stage of the transcriptional response. In this review we discuss the dynamics of a nuclear receptor, and its transcriptional response in the chromatin context.

The Mediator subunit MED1/TRAP220 is required for optimal glucocorticoid receptor-mediated transcription activation

The MED1/TRAP220 subunit of the Mediator plays a key role in facilitating ligand-dependent interactions of this multisubunit coactivator complex with nuclear receptors through their ligand binding domains. The isolated MED1/TRAP220 protein previously was shown to interact with glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in a ligand-dependent manner. However, the functional role of MED1/TRAP220, within the context of the entire Mediator, is not well studied in GR-mediated transcription. In this study, we show that GR binds directly to the Mediator complex and that both LXXLL motifs of MED1/TRAP220 contribute to its binding to GR. Furthermore, using a Med1/Trap220-/- mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) line that lacks entirely MED1/TRAP220, we show that MED1/TRAP220 enhances GR-mediated transcription from an MMTV promoter based-reporter gene and that mutations in the MED1/TRAP220 LXXLL motifs reduce, but do not eliminate, GR-dependent transcription. An analysis of endogenous genes in Med1/Trap220-/- cells has confirmed a variable MED1/TRAP220 requirement for different GR target genes. Taken together, these findings support the idea that Mediator, at least in part through MED1/TRAP220, plays a coregulatory role in ligand-dependent GR-mediated gene expression.

Transcription Factor PU.1 Controls Transcription Start Site Positioning and Alternative TLR4 Promoter Usage

Human and mouse show markedly different sensitivities toward bacterial endotoxins, and recent evidence suggests that a species-specific regulation of the lipopolysaccharide receptor Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) may contribute to this phenomenon. To gain further insight into mechanisms of Tlr4 regulation, we conducted a detailed in vivo and in vitro study of the murine Tlr4 gene, including analysis of transcription start site location, transcription factor occupancy, and activities of its proximal regulatory sequences. Our analyses identified a PU.1-dependent myeloid promoter, which is conserved between humans and mouse. We also identified an additional, distal promoter, located approximately 200 bp upstream of the myeloid-specific promoter, which is a functional target of E-box binding factors. In contrast to humans, where non-myeloid cells utilize both promoters, the distal Tlr4 promoter initiates all Tlr4 transcripts in murine non-myeloid cells, indicating that species-specific differences in TLR4 mRNA regulation may primarily exist in non-myeloid cell types. Interestingly, PU.1 null murine myeloid progenitor cells predominantly use the distal promoter, and the conditional induction of PU.1 expression in these cells leads to the rapid switch of transcription initiation to the proximal myeloid promoter. This indicates a direct role for PU.1 in determining the transcriptional start site and in recruiting the basal transcription machinery to myeloid promoters.

Single-cell analysis of glucocorticoid receptor action reveals that stochastic post-chromatin association mechanisms regulate ligand-specific transcription

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) dynamically interacts with response elements in the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter to regulate steroid-dependent transcription. In a clonal mammary carcinoma cell line containing a tandem array of MMTV promoter-reporter gene cassettes integrated at a single genomic locus, direct binding of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-GR fusion protein to the MMTV regulatory elements can be observed in living cells. After ligand treatment, MMTV-dependent transcription in individual cells was detected by RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). High-resolution fluorescence images were acquired from large numbers of randomly selected cells. Images were analyzed with a novel automated computer algorithm, measuring the RNA FISH signal and the relative GFP-GR fluorescence intensity at the MMTV array for each cell. Although dexamethasone increased the mean RNA FISH signal approximately 10-fold, RU486 produced only about a 2-fold induction, as expected for this mixed antagonist. For all treatment conditions, the relative GFP-GR fluorescence at the array for the averaged cells paralleled the RNA FISH measurements, suggesting that image analysis accurately detected an increase in steady-state GR association with the MMTV array that was responsible for the increase in transcriptional activity. The antagonist-dependent decreases in GR association with the MMTV promoter were confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, supporting the image analysis results. A pronounced cell-to-cell variability was observed in RNA FISH signal and GR-MMTV association within treatment groups. We observed a nonlinear relationship between GR-MMTV association and RNA FISH in individual cells, indicating that differences in GR-MMTV interaction account for some, but not all, of the transcriptional heterogeneity between individual cells. In selected cell subpopulations with equal levels of GR-MMTV association, there was a decrease in RNA FISH signal with RU486 treatment compared with dexamethasone treatment. These results indicate that stochastic events occurring after GR-promoter association, such as the actions of chromatin remodeling complexes or other cofactors, change in a ligand-dependent manner and regulate heterogeneous transcription in individual cells.

A Role of the Amino-Terminal (N) and Carboxyl-Terminal (C) Interaction in Binding of Androgen Receptor to Chromatin

The N-terminal domain of AR is known to engage a hormone-dependent interaction with its C-terminal ligand-binding domain, and this N/C interaction is known to modulate AR transcriptional activity. Using Xenopus oocytes as a model system to study transcriptional regulation in chromatin, we found that two previously reported N/C interaction-defective AR mutants, one with deletion of 23FQNLF27(ARDeltaF) and one with a Gly 21 to Glu mutation (ARG21E), were surprisingly inactive in activating transcription from various reporters assembled into chromatin. Further study using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that these mutants failed to bind both mouse mammary tumor virus-long terminal repeat and prostate-specific antigen enhancer assembled into chromatin. This defect is specific to chromatin because both mutants could bind to a consensus AR response element in vitro and activate transcription driven by mouse mammary tumor virus-long terminal repeat in transient transfection as effective as the wild-type AR. To further substantiate this novel finding, we established 293 cell lines that stably expressed either AR or ARDeltaF mutant in an inducible manner. Using these cell lines, we confirmed by using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay that AR but not ARDeltaF could bind to the endogenous prostate-specific antigen enhancer. Furthermore, we found that the ARDeltaF mutant interacts poorly with Brg1, the ATPase subunit of the chromatin-remodeling factor SWI/SNF. Taken together, our study reveals a novel role of AR N/C interaction in control of AR chromatin binding and suggests a working model that the proper N/C interaction is required for AR to recruit SWI/SNF complex, which in turn remodels chromatin to allow AR to bind to AR response elements in chromatin.

Chromatin dynamics and the evolution of alternate promoter states

Eucaryotic gene transcriptional switches utilize changes both in the activity and composition of soluble transcription factor complexes, and epigenetic modifications to the chromatin template. Until recently, alternate states of promoter activity have been associated with the assembly of relatively stable multiprotein complexes on target genes, with transitions in the composition of these complexes occurring on the time scale of minutes or hours. The development of living cell techniques to characterize transcription factor function in real time has led to an alternate view of highly dynamic protein/template interactions. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that energy-dependent processes contribute significantly to the rapid movement of proteins in living cells, and to the exchange of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins with regulatory elements. Potential mechanisms involved in the unexpectedly rapid flux of factor/template interactions are discussed in the context of a "return-to-template" model for transcription factor function.

An estrogen receptor chimera senses ligands by nuclear translocation

We have developed a new mammalian cell-based assay to screen for ligands of the estrogen receptor. A fluorescently tagged chimera between the glucocorticoid and the estrogen receptors, unlike the constitutively nuclear estrogen receptor, is cytoplasmic in the absence of hormone and translocates to the nucleus in response to estradiol. The chimera maintains specificity for estrogen receptor alpha ligands and does not show cross-reactivity with other steroids, providing a clean system for drug discovery. Natural and synthetic estrogen receptor alpha agonists as well as phytoestrogens effectively translocate the receptor to the nucleus in a dose-dependent manner. Antagonists of the estrogen receptor can also transmit the structural signals that result in receptor nuclear translocation. The potency and efficacy of high-affinity ligands can be evaluated in our system by measuring the nuclear translocation of the fluorescently labeled receptor in response to increasing ligand concentrations. The chimera is transcriptionally competent on transient and replicating templates, and is inhibited by estrogen receptor antagonists. Interestingly, the nucleoplasmic mobility of the chimera, determined by FRAP analysis, is faster than that of the wild type estrogen receptor, and the chimera is resistant to ICI immobilization. The translocation properties of this chimera can be utilized in high content screens for novel estrogen receptor modulators.

Factors regulating endogenous retroviral sequences in human and mouse

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are stably integrated in the genome of vertebrates and inherited as Mendelian genes. The several human ERV (HERV) families and related elements represent up to 5-8% of the DNA of our species. ERVs may be involved in the regulation of adjacent genomic loci, especially promoting the tissue-specific expression of genes; some HERVs may have functional roles, e.g., coding for the placental fusogenic protein, syncytin. This paper reviews the growing evidence about factors that may modulate ERVs, including: cell and tissue types (with special attention to placenta and germ cells), processes related to differentiation and aging, cytokines, agents that disrupt cell functions (e.g., DNA hypomethylating agents) and steroids. Special attention is given to HERVs, due to their possible involvement in autoimmunity and reproduction, as well as altered expression in some cancer types; moreover, different HERV families may deserve specific attention, due to remarkable differences concerning, e.g., expression in tissues. A comparison with factors interacting with murine ERV-related sequences indicates that the mouse may be a useful model for studying some patterns of HERV regulation. Overall, the available evidence identifies the diverse, potential interactions with endogenous or exogenous factors as a promising field for investigating the roles of ERVs in physiology and disease.

Cofilin 1 is revealed as an inhibitor of glucocorticoid receptor by analysis of hormone-resistant cells

Significant knowledge about glucocorticoid signaling has accumulated, yet many aspects remain unknown. We aimed to discover novel factors involved in glucocorticoid receptor regulation that do not necessarily require direct receptor interaction. We achieved this by using a functional genetic screen: a stable cell line which cannot survive hormone treatment was engineered, randomly mutated, and selected in the presence of glucocorticoid. A hormone-resistant clone was analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Differentially expressed proteins were identified and tested as candidates for regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor. An unexpected candidate, cofilin 1, inhibited receptor activity. Cofilin is known to promote actin depolymerization and filament severing. Several experiments suggest that this feature of cofilin is involved in its inhibitory action. Both its actin depolymerization activity and its inhibitory action on the receptor are dependent on its phosphorylation state. Treatment of cells with a cytoskeleton-disrupting agent decreased receptor activity, as did overexpression of actin, particularly a mutant actin that does not polymerize. In addition, overexpression of cofilin and actin as well as chemical cytoskeleton disruption changed the subcellular receptor distribution and upregulated c-Jun, which could constitute the inhibitory mechanism of cofilin. In summary, cofilin represents a novel factor that can cause glucocorticoid resistance.

Chromatin acetylation, memory, and LTP are impaired in CBP+/- mice: a model for the cognitive deficit in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and its amelioration

We studied a mouse model of the haploinsufficiency form of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS), an inheritable disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding the CREB binding protein (CBP) and characterized by mental retardation and skeletal abnormalities. In these mice, chromatin acetylation, some forms of long-term memory, and the late phase of hippocampal long-term potentiation (L-LTP) were impaired. We ameliorated the L-LTP deficit in two ways: (1) by enhancing the expression of CREB-dependent genes, and (2) by inhibiting histone deacetyltransferase activity (HDAC), the molecular counterpart of the histone acetylation function of CBP. Inhibition of HDAC also reversed the memory defect observed in fear conditioning. These findings suggest that some of the cognitive and physiological deficits observed on RTS are not simply due to the reduction of CBP during development but may also result from the continued requirement throughout life for both the CREB co-activation and the histone acetylation function of CBP.

Progesterone receptor deficient in chromatin binding has an altered cellular state

Our previous work has shown that the progesterone receptor (PR) can exist in two distinct functional states in mammary adenocarcinoma cells. The differences in function included the ability to activate a promoter in organized chromatin, sensitivity to ligand, and ligand-independent activation. To determine whether these functional differences were because of altered cellular processing, we carried out biochemical analyses of the functionally distinct PRs. Although the majority of PR is localized to the nucleus, biochemical partitioning resulted in a loosely bound (cytosolic) fraction, and a tightly bound (nuclear) fraction. In the absence of progestins, the functionally distinct PRs differed significantly in partitioning between the two fractions. To characterize these fractions further, we analyzed interactions of unliganded PR with chaperones by coimmunoprecipitation. We determined that PR in the cytosolic fraction associated with hsp90 and p23. In contrast, PR in the nuclear fraction consisted of complexes containing hsp90, p23, and FKBP51 as well as PR that was dimerized and highly phosphorylated. Hormone treatment significantly reduced the formation of all PR-chaperone complexes. The hsp90 inhibitor, geldanamycin, similarly blocked transcriptional activity of both functionally distinct receptors. However, the two forms of the PR differed in their ability to associate with the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in organized chromatin. These findings provide new information about the composition and distribution of mature progesterone receptor complexes in mammary adenocarcinoma cells, and suggest that differences in receptor subcellular distribution have a significant impact on their function. These findings also reveal that transiently expressed steroid receptors may not always be processed like their endogenous counterparts.

Estrogen receptor-dependent proteasomal degradation of the glucocorticoid receptor is coupled to an increase in mdm2 protein expression

Glucocorticoids and estrogens regulate a number of vital physiological processes. We developed a model breast cancer cell line, MCF-7 M, to examine potential mechanisms by which the ligand-bound estrogen receptor (ER) regulates glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated transcription. MCF-7 cells, which endogenously express ERalpha, were stably transfected with mouse mammary tumor virus promoter-luciferase (MMTV-LUC) reporter and GR expression constructs. Our results demonstrate that treatment with estrogen agonists (17beta-estradiol [E2], diethylstilbestrol, genistein), but not antagonists (tamoxifen or raloxifene), for 48 h inhibits GR-mediated MMTV-LUC transcription and chromatin remodeling. Furthermore, estrogen agonists inhibit glucocorticoid induction of p21 mRNA and protein levels, suggesting that the repressive effect applies to other GR-regulated genes and proteins in MCF-7 cells. Importantly, GR transcriptional activity is compromised because treatment with estrogen agonists down regulates GR protein levels. The protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide and the proteasome inhibitor MG132 block E2-mediated decrease in GR protein levels, suggesting that estrogen agonists down regulate the GR via the proteasomal degradation pathway. In support of this, we demonstrate that E2-mediated GR degradation is coupled to an increase in p53 and its key regulator protein Mdm2 (murine double minute 2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase shown to target the GR for degradation. Using the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we demonstrate an E2-dependent recruitment of ERalpha to the Mdm2 promoter, suggesting a role of ER in the regulation of Mdm2 protein expression and hence the enhanced GR degradation in the presence of estrogen agonists. Our study shows that cross talk between the GR and ER involves multiple signaling pathways, indicative of the mechanistic diversity within steroid receptor-regulated transcription.

Progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors recruit distinct coactivator complexes and promote distinct patterns of local chromatin modification

It is well established that steroid receptor function requires interaction with coactivators. However, the mechanisms through which steroid receptors elicit precise assembly of coactivator complexes and the way the steroid activation signal is transduced remain elusive. Using a T47D cell line stably integrated with a mouse mammary tumor virus-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (MMTV-CAT) reporter, we demonstrate that specific steroid receptors exhibit preferential recruitment of SRC-1 family coactivators, which determines the subsequent recruitment of specific downstream coregulator molecules. Upon ligand treatment, progesterone receptor (PR) interacted preferentially with SRC-1, which recruited CBP and significantly enhanced acetylation at K5 of histone H4. In contrast, activated glucocorticoid receptor (GR) preferentially associated with SRC-2 (TIF-2/GRIP-1), which subsequently recruited pCAF and led to specific modification of histone H3, suggesting that specific coactivators recruit distinct histone acetyltransferases to modulate the transcription of steroid-responsive genes. Loss-of-function experiments further support the predicted roles of SRC-1 and SRC-2 in, respectively, PR- and GR-mediated transcription on the MMTV promoter. This study indicates that differential recruitment of coactivators by nuclear receptors determines the assembly of coactivator complexes on target promoters to mediate specific transcription signals.

Glucocorticoid receptor domain requirements for chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in different nucleoprotein contexts

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) contains several activation domains, tau1 (AF-1), tau2, and AF-2, which were initially defined using transiently transfected reporter constructs. Using domain mutations in the context of full-length GR, this study defines those domains required for activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter in two distinct nucleoprotein configurations. A transiently transfected MMTV template with a disorganized, accessible chromatin structure was largely dependent on the AF-2 domain for activation. In contrast, activation of an MMTV template in organized, replicated chromatin requires both domains but has a relatively larger dependence on the tau1 domain. Domain requirements for GR-induced chromatin remodeling of the latter template were also investigated. Mutation of the AF-2 helix 12 domain partially inhibits the induction of nuclease hypersensitivity, but the inhibition was relieved in the absence of tau1, suggesting the occurrence of an important interaction between the two domains. Further mutational analysis indicates that GR-induced chromatin remodeling requires the ligand-binding domain in the region of helix 3. Our study shows that the GR activation surfaces required for transcriptional modulation of a target promoter were determined in part by its chromatin structure. Within a particular cellular environment the GR appears to possess a significant degree of versatility in the mechanism by which it activates a target promoter.

The viral transactivator E1A regulates the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in an isoform- and chromatin-specific manner

Proteins encoded by the adenovirus E1A gene regulate both cellular and viral genes to mediate effects on cell cycle, differentiation, and cell growth control. We have identified the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter as a target of E1A action and investigated the role nucleoprotein structure plays in its response to E1A. Both 12 and 13 S forms target the MMTV promoter when it has a disorganized and accessible chromatin configuration. However, whereas the 13 S form is stimulatory, the 12 S form is repressive. When the MMTV promoter adopts an organized and repressed chromatin structure, it is targeted only by the 13 S form, which stimulates it. Although evidence indicates that E1A interacts with the SWI/SNF remodeling complex, E1A had no effect on chromatin remodeling at the MMTV promoter in organized chromatin. Analysis of E1A mutants showed that stimulation of the MMTV promoter is mediated solely through conserved region 3 and does not require interaction with Rb, p300/CBP-associated factor, or CBP/p300. Imaging analysis showed that E1A colocalizes with MMTV sequences in vivo, suggesting that it functions directly at the promoter. These results indicate that E1A stimulates the MMTV promoter in a fashion independent of chromatin conformation and through a direct mechanism involving interaction with the basal transcription machinery.

Nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is expressed in resting murine lymphocytes. The PPARalpha in T and B lymphocytes is both transactivation and transrepression competent

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are transcription factors that belong to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. PPARalpha and PPARgamma ligands have been demonstrated to exert anti-inflammatory activities in macrophages by repressing the activities of several transcription factors. PPARgamma is expressed in T lymphocytes and may play a role in cytokine production, cellular proliferation, and susceptibility to apoptosis. Herein, we demonstrate that T and B lymphocytes constitutively express PPARalpha. PPARalpha represents the predominant isoform expressed in lymphocytes, whereas PPARgamma dominates in all cell types of the myeloid lineage. PPARalpha expression was down-regulated following T-cell activation while PPARgamma expression increased under the same activating conditions. PPARalpha expression in T cells may be regulated by microenvironmental factors, because Peyer's patch T cells expressed far greater levels of PPARalpha than T cells isolated from peripheral lymphoid organs. Exposure to specific ligand determined that PPARalpha in lymphocytes can effectively transactivate a peroxisome proliferator response element reporter construct. PPARalpha's ability to regulate endogenous genes, however, required treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Finally, ligand activation of lymphocyte PPARalpha antagonized NF-kappaB. Our observation that a functional PPARalpha exists within T cells and B lymphocytes suggests an expanding role for this nuclear receptor in cells of the immune system.

Chromosomal integration of retinoic acid response elements prevents cooperative transcriptional activation by retinoic acid receptor and retinoid X receptor

All-trans-retinoic acid receptors (RAR) and 9-cis-retinoic acid receptors (RXR) are nuclear receptors known to cooperatively activate transcription from retinoid-regulated promoters. By comparing the transactivating properties of RAR and RXR in P19 cells using either plasmid or chromosomal reporter genes containing the mRAR beta 2 gene promoter, we found contrasting patterns of transcriptional regulation in each setting. Cooperativity between RXR and RAR occurred at all times with transiently introduced promoters, but was restricted to a very early stage (<3 h) for chromosomal promoters. This time-dependent loss of cooperativity was specific for chromosomal templates containing two copies of a retinoid-responsive element (RARE) and was not influenced by the spacing between the two RAREs. This loss of cooperativity suggested a delayed acquisition of RAR full transcriptional competence because (i) cooperativity was maintained at RAR ligand subsaturating concentrations, (ii) overexpression of SRC-1 led to loss of cooperativity and even to strong repression of chromosomal templates activity, and (iii) loss of cooperativity was observed when additional cis-acting response elements were activated. Surprisingly, histone deacetylase inhibitors counteracted this loss of cooperativity by repressing partially RAR-mediated activation of chromosomal promoters. Loss of cooperativity was not correlated to local histone hyperacetylation or to alteration of constitutive RNA polymerase II (RNAP) loading at the promoter region. Unexpectedly, RNAP binding to transcribed regions was correlated to the RAR activation state as well as to acetylation levels of histones H3 and H4, suggesting that RAR acts at the mRAR beta promoter by triggering the switch from an RNA elongation-incompetent RNAP form towards an RNA elongation-competent RNAP.

Transactivation specificity of glucocorticoid versus progesterone receptors. Role of functionally different interactions of transcription factors with amino- and carboxyl-terminal receptor domains

A major unanswered question of glucocorticoid and progesterone action is how different whole cell responses arise when both of the cognate receptors can bind to, and activate, the same hormone response elements. We have documented previously that the EC(50) of agonist complexes, and the partial agonist activity of antagonist complexes, of both glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and progesterone receptors (PRs) are modulated by increased amounts of homologous receptor and of coregulators. We now ask whether these components can differentially alter GR and PR transcriptional properties. To remove possible cell-specific differences, we have examined both receptors in the common environment of a line of mouse mammary adenocarcinoma (1470.2) cells. In order to segregate the responses that might be due to unequal nucleosome reorganization by the two receptors from those reflecting interactions with other components, we chose a transiently transfected reporter containing a simple glucocorticoid response element (i.e. GREtkLUC). No significant differences are found with elevated levels of either receptor. However, major, qualitative differences are seen with the corepressors SMRT and NCoR, which afford opposite responses with GR and PR. Studies with chimeric GR/PR receptors indicate that no one segment of PR or GR is responsible for these properties and that the composite response likely involves interactions with both the amino and carboxyl termini of receptors. Collectively, the data suggest that GR and PR induction of responsive genes in a given cell can be differentially controlled, in part, by unequal interactions of multiple receptor domains with assorted nuclear cofactors.

Effects of antiandrogens on chromatin remodeling and transcription of the integrated mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

Inhibition of the ligand-activated androgen receptor (AR) by antiandrogens plays an important role in the treatment of various hyperandrogenic disorders including prostate cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms of antiandrogen activity in vivo remain unclear. In this study we analyzed the effects of cyproterone acetate (CPA), flutamide (F), and hydroxyflutamide (OHF) on transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the genomically integrated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. This promoter has provided an excellent model system to study the impact of steroid hormones on transcriptional activation in the context of a defined chromatin structure. The MMTV hormone response element is positioned on a phased nucleosome, which becomes remodeled in response to steroids. We utilized this model system in mouse L-cell fibroblasts that contain a stably integrated MMTV promoter. In these cells, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) induced a large increase of AR protein levels that correlated with transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the MMTV promoter. Coadministration of DHT and CPA or DHT and OHF in these cells inhibited the increase of AR levels, which resulted in a strong blockage of transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the MMTV promoter. In contrast, F had no significant influence on these activities. We conclude that a major portion of the antiandrogenic effects of CPA and OHF in vivo are mediated by the reduction of AR levels.

Characterization of transiently and constitutively expressed progesterone receptors: evidence for two functional states

Activated steroid receptors induce chromatin remodeling events in the promoters of some target genes. We previously reported that transiently expressed progesterone receptor (PR) cannot activate mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter when it adopts the form of ordered chromatin. However, when expressed continuously, the PR acquires this ability. In this study we explored whether this gain of function occurs through alterations in nucleoprotein structure at the MMTV promoter or through changes in receptor status. We observed no major structural differences at the MMTV promoter in the presence of constitutively expressed PR and found its mechanism of activation to be very similar to that of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). However, a systematic comparison of the functional behavior of the transiently and constitutively expressed PR elucidated significant differences. The transiently expressed PR is activated in the absence of ligand by cAMP and by components in FBS and has significantly increased sensitivity to progestins. In contrast, the constitutively expressed PR is refractory to activation by cAMP and serum and has normal sensitivity to its ligand. In addition, while the PR is localized to the nucleus in both cases, a significant fraction of the transiently expressed PR is tightly bound to the nucleus even in the absence of ligand, while the majority of constitutively expressed PR is not. These results strongly suggest that the PR undergoes processing in the cell subsequent to its initial expression and that this processing is important for various aspects of its function, including its ability to productively interact with target genes that require chromatin remodeling for activation.

A histone deacetylase inhibitor potentiates estrogen receptor activation of a stably integrated vitellogenin promoter in HepG2 cells

To compare the role of histone deactylation in estrogen activation of a transiently transfected vitellogenin (VIT) promoter and an integrated VIT promoter in the same cells, we produced three HepG2, human hepatoma, cell lines (HepG2ERV cells) stably expressing human estrogen receptor alpha (hERalpha) and containing an integrated VIT promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (VIT-CAT) reporter gene. The three ER-positive HepG2ERV cell lines and wild-type, ER-negative, HepG2 cells cotransfected with cytomegalovirus-hERalpha exhibited similar MOX-dependent inductions of 20- to 50-fold with a transiently transfected VIT-luciferase reporter and 15- to 50-fold with a transfected 4-estrogen response element-TATA-luciferase reporter gene. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A, did not enhance MOX induction of the transiently transfected VIT promoter in the HepG2ERV cells. In contrast, trichostatin A dramatically potentiated MOX induction of the stably integrated VIT-CAT reporter gene, resulting in MOX-ER-dependent increases in CAT activity of up to 600-fold. These data demonstrate that although liganded ER exhibits the capacity to fully activate a transiently transfected VIT promoter, under some circumstances the ability to reorganize a repressive chromatin structure may be limiting for steroid receptor action.

Roles of the NFI/CTF gene family in transcription and development

The Nuclear Factor I (NFI) family of site-specific DNA-binding proteins (also known as CTF or CAAT box transcription factor) functions both in viral DNA replication and in the regulation of gene expression. The classes of genes whose expression is modulated by NFI include those that are ubiquitously expressed, as well as those that are hormonally, nutritionally, and developmentally regulated. The NFI family is composed of four members in vertebrates (NFI-A, NFI-B, NFI-C and NFI-X), and the four NFI genes are expressed in unique, but overlapping, patterns during mouse embryogenesis and in the adult. Transcripts of each NFI gene are differentially spliced, yielding as many as nine distinct proteins from a single gene. Products of the four NFI genes differ in their abilities to either activate or repress transcription, likely through fundamentally different mechanisms. Here, we will review the properties of the NFI genes and proteins and their known functions in gene expression and development.

Opposing effects of corepressor and coactivators in determining the dose-response curve of agonists, and residual agonist activity of antagonists, for glucocorticoid receptor-regulated gene expression

A distinguishing, but unexplained, characteristic of steroid hormone action is the dose-response curve for the regulation of gene expression. We have previously reported that the dose-response curve for glucocorticoid induction of a transfected reporter gene in CV-1 and HeLa cells is repositioned in the presence of increasing concentrations of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). This behavior is now shown to be independent of the reporter, promoter, or enhancer, consistent with our proposal that a transacting factor(s) was being titrated by added receptors. Candidate factors have been identified by the observation that changes in glucocorticoid induction parameters in CV-1 cells could be reproduced by varying the cellular levels of coactivators [transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2), steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1), and amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1)], comodulator [CREB-binding protein (CBP)], or corepressor [silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid-hormone receptors (SMRT)] without concomitant increases in GR. Significantly, the effects of TIF2 and SMRT were mutually antagonistic. Similarly, additional SMRT could reverse the action of increased levels of GRs in HeLa cells, thus indicating that the effects of cofactors on transcription may be general for GR in a variety of cells. These data further indicate that GRs are yet an additional target of the corepressor SMRT. At the same time, these cofactors were found to be capable of regulating the level of residual agonist activity displayed by antiglucocorticoids. Finally, these observations suggest that a novel role for cofactors is to participate in processes that determine the dose-response curve, and partial agonist activity, of GR-steroid complexes. This new activity of cofactors is disconnected from their ability to increase or decrease GR transactivation. An equilibrium model is proposed in which the ratio of coactivator-corepressor bound to either receptor-agonist or -antagonist complexes regulates the final transcriptional properties.

A ligand binding domain mutation in the mouse glucocorticoid receptor functionally links chromatin remodeling and transcription initiation

We utilized the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat (LTR) in vivo to understand how the interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) with a nucleosome-assembled promoter allows access of factors required for the transition from a repressed promoter to a derepressed, transcriptionally competent promoter. A mutation (C644G) in the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the mouse GR has provided information regarding the steps required in the derepression/activation process and in the functional significance of the two major transcriptional activation domains, AF1 and AF2. The mutant GR activates transcription from a transiently transfected promoter that has a disordered nucleosomal structure, though significantly less well than the wild-type GR. With an integrated, replicated promoter, which is assembled in an ordered nucleosomal array, the mutant GR does not activate transcription, and it fails to induce chromatin remodeling of the MMTV LTR promoter, as indicated by nuclease accessibility assays. Together, these findings support a two-step model for the transition of a nucleosome-assembled, repressed promoter to its transcriptionally active, derepressed form. In addition, we find that the C-terminal GR mutation is dominant over the transcription activation function of the N-terminal GR activation domain. These findings suggest that the primary activation function of the C-terminal activation domain is different from the function of the N-terminal activation domain and that it is required for derepression of the chromatin-repressed MMTV promoter.

Inhibition of histone deacetylation augments dihydrotestosterone induction of androgen receptor levels: an explanation for trichostatin A effects on androgen-induced chromatin remodeling and transcription of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

The integrated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter has provided an excellent model system with which to study the impact of steroid hormones on transcriptional activation in the context of a defined chromatin structure. The hormone response element (HRE) of this promoter is positioned on a phased nucleosome which becomes remodeled in response to steroids. One possible mechanism of chromatin remodeling by steroid receptors could involve recruitment of coactivators which alter the histone acetylation status of the HRE nucleosome. To examine how the androgen receptor (AR) influences transcription and chromatin remodeling and to assess whether changes in histone acetylation are involved in these effects, we determined whether the specific histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) influenced basal- and androgen-mediated transcriptional activation of the integrated MMTV promoter in the mouse L-cell fibroblast cell line 29+. These cells harbor the MMTV promoter integrated in the genome and express only one steroid hormone receptor subtype, i.e., the AR. Surprisingly, we found that treatment of the cells with TSA alone had virtually no effect on transcription and chromatin remodeling of the MMTV promoter nor on AR levels. However, pretreatment with TSA augmented the DHT effects on all three parameters. These results suggest that histone acetylation changes at the MMTV B nucleosome per se are not alone sufficient to induce chromatin remodeling and subsequent induction of MMTV transcription. Rather, the histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA exerts a portion of its effect on MMTV chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation indirectly through increases in AR levels.

Multiple Cbfa/AML sites in the rat osteocalcin promoter are required for basal and vitamin D-responsive transcription and contribute to chromatin organization

Three Cbfa motifs are strategically positioned in the bone-specific rat osteocalcin (rOC) promoter. Sites A and B flank the vitamin D response element in the distal promoter and sites B and C flank a positioned nucleosome in the proximal promoter. The functional significance of each Cbfa element was addressed by mutating individual or multiple Cbfa sites within the context of the -1.1-kb rOC promoter fused to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene. Promoter activity was assayed following transient transfection and after stable genomic integration in ROS 17/2.8 osteoblastic cell lines. We show that all three Cbfa sites are required for maximal basal expression of the rOC promoter. However, the distal sites A and B each contribute significantly more (P < 0.001) to promoter activity than site C. In a genomic context, sites A and B can largely compensate for a mutation at the proximal site C, and paired mutations involving site A (mAB or mAC) result in a far greater loss of activity than the mBC mutation. Strikingly, mutation of the three Cbfa sites leads to abrogation of responsiveness to vitamin D. Vitamin D-enhanced activity is also not observed when sites A and B are mutated. Significantly, related to these losses in transcriptional activity, mutation of the three Cbfa sites results in altered chromatin structure as reflected by loss of DNase I-hypersensitive sites at the vitamin D response element and over the proximal tissue-specific basal promoter. These findings strongly support a multifunctional role for Cbfa factors in regulating gene expression, not only as simple transcriptional transactivators but also by facilitating modifications in promoter architecture and chromatin organization.

Long-distance chromatin mechanisms controlling tissue-specific gene locus activation

Several different types of regulatory mechanisms contribute to the tissue- and development-specific regulation of a gene. It is now well established that, in addition to promoters, upstream cis-regulatory elements, which bind a variety of trans-acting factors, are essential for correct gene activation. In the last few years, however, it has become evident that the chromatin structure of eukaryotic genes is an important additional regulatory layer that is essential for correct gene expression during development. Chromatin is essentially a repressive environment for transcription factors; hence, much effort in recent years has been devoted to the elucidation of how these repressive forces are overcome during the process of gene locus activation. A particular interesting question in this context is: what are the molecular mechanisms by which extensive regions of chromatin, in many cases far outside the coding region, are reorganized during development? In this review, I summarize data from recent investigations that have uncovered a surprising variety of factors involved in this process.

The -3.9 kb DNaseI hypersensitive site of the chicken lysozyme locus harbours an enhancer with unusual chromatin reorganizing activity

Tissue specific regulation of the chicken lysozyme locus is achieved by a combination of positive and negative cis-regulatory elements. Here we describe the molecular characterization of a newly discovered enhancer element located -3.9kb upstream of the transcription start. The -3.9kb enhancer is activated early in macrophage differentiation, as indicated by chromatin reorganization in macrophage precursor cells. Interestingly, enhancer activation leads to nucleosome phasing. Tissue specificity of expression is achieved by a combination of 5'-sequences with ubiquitous enhancer activity and 3'-flanking sequences. The 5'-half contains binding sites for members of the nuclear factor I transcription family and a yet unknown protein. We could show by in vivo footprinting that the ubiquitously expressed factors occupy their binding sites only in lysozyme expressing cells. We conclude that a specific chromatin architecture may be responsible for the differential activity of the enhancer.

Comparison of chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter by the androgen and glucocorticoid receptor

We examined the interaction between the androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) at the transcriptional level using mouse fibroblast cell lines harboring an integrated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. We found that the AR, after induction with dihydrotestosterone (DHT), caused a progressive increase in MMTV-CAT reporter activity over 72 h which was correlated to an increase in chromatin remodeling of the MMTV promoter in the vicinity of the hormone response element (HRE). In contrast, stimulation of the GR by the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex) caused a transient increase in MMTV transcriptional activity which returned to basal levels after 72 h. These changes were correlated to a transient increase in chromatin remodeling in the region of the HRE. Neither cotreatment nor pretreatment with Dex affected the DHT response. In fact, there was a more than additive effect of the two hormones on transcription at early time points. This suggests that the inability of GR to remodel chromatin, after 24 h of hormone treatment, is most likely related to changes in the GR itself and not the chromatin remodeling process. Consistent with this, nuclear GR levels dropped by greater than 50% after Dex treatment whereas the AR was induced fourfold after 24 h of DHT treatment. We conclude that a promoter with an ordered chromatin structure can still respond to androgens even after its glucocorticoid responsiveness is lost. This may be one mechanism cells utilize to establish target gene specificity for nuclear receptors that recognize identical DNA sequences.

Nuclear factor I-mediated repression of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter is abrogated by the coactivators p300/CBP and SRC-1

To better understand the function of nuclear factor I (NFI) proteins in transcription, we have used transient transfection assays to assess transcriptional modulation by NFI proteins on the NFI-dependent mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. Expression of NFI-C or NFI-X, but not NFI-A or NFI-B proteins, represses glucocorticoid induction of the MMTV promoter in HeLa cells. Repression is DNA binding-independent as a deletion construct expressing the NH2-terminal 160 residues of NFI-C represses but does not bind DNA. Repression by NFI-C is cell type-dependent and occurs in HeLa and COS-1 cells but not 293 or JEG-3 cells. NFI-C does not repress progesterone induction of the MMTV promoter in HeLa cells, suggesting that progesterone induction of the promoter differs mechanistically from glucocorticoid induction. NFI-C-mediated repression is alleviated by overexpression of glucocorticoid receptor (GR), suggesting that NFI-C represses the MMTV promoter by preventing GR function. However, repression by NFI-C occurs with only a subset of glucocorticoid-responsive promoters, as the chimeric NFIGREbeta-gal promoter that is activated by GR is not repressed by NFI-C. Since the coactivator proteins p300/CBP, SRC-1A, and RAC3 had previously been shown to function at steroid hormone-responsive promoters, we asked whether they could influence NFI-C-mediated repression of MMTV expression. Expression of p300/CBP or SRC-1A alleviates repression by NFI-C, whereas RAC3 has no effect. This abrogation of NFI-C-mediated repression by p300/CBP and SRC-1A suggests that repression by NFI-C may occur by interference with coactivator function at the MMTV promoter.

Differential localization and activity of the A- and B-forms of the human progesterone receptor using green fluorescent protein chimeras

Subcellular localization and transcriptional activity of green fluorescent protein-progesterone receptor A and B chimeras (GFP-PRA and GFP-PRB) were examined in living mammalian cells. Both GFP-PRA and B chimeras were found to be similar in transcriptional activity compared with their non-GFP counterparts. GFP-PRA and PRA were both weakly active, while GFP-PRB and PRB gave a 20- to 40-fold induction using a reporter gene containing the full-length mouse mammary tumor virus long-terminal repeat linked to the luciferase gene (pLTRluc). Using fluorescence microscopy, nuclear/cytoplasmic distributions for the unliganded and hormone activated forms of GFP-PRA and GFP-PRB were characterized. The two forms of the receptor were found to have distinct intracellular distributions; GFP-PRA was found to be more nuclear than GFP-PRB in four cell lines examined. The causes for and implications of this differential localization of the A and B forms of the human PR are discussed.

Interleukin-1-induced nuclear factor-kappaB-IkappaBalpha autoregulatory feedback loop in hepatocytes. A role for protein kinase calpha in post-transcriptional regulation of ikappabalpha resynthesis

The IkappaB inhibitors regulate the activity of the potent transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). Following signal-induced IkappaB proteolysis, NF-kappaB translocates into the nucleus to activate transcription of target genes, including IkappaBalpha itself, initiating the "NF-kappaB-IkappaBalpha autoregulatory feedback loop." Upon IkappaBalpha resynthesis, NF-kappaB is subsequently inactivated and redistributed back into the cytoplasm. We have previously reported a robust NF-kappaB-IkappaBalpha autoregulatory feedback loop in HepG2 hepatocytes. Sixty minutes after tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) stimulation, IkappaBalpha is resynthesized to approximately 2-fold greater level than in control cells and completely inhibits NF-kappaB binding. Here we investigate the mechanism for IkappaBalpha resynthesis comparing the effect of stimulation of TNF-alpha with that of interleukin-1 (IL-1alpha). Although either TNF-alpha or IL-1alpha stimulation of protein kinase C (PKC)-down-regulated cells equivalently induces NF-kappaB translocation, the kinetics of IkappaBalpha resynthesis is slowed. Moreover, pretreatment with selective calcium-dependent PKC inhibitors selectively slowed the kinetics of the IL-1alpha-induced overshoot without affecting that produced by TNF-alpha. Down-regulation of PKCalpha by antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides and expression vectors selectively blocked the IL-1alpha-induced IkappaBalpha overshoot. In the absence of PKCalpha, although IL-1alpha induced similar amounts of IkappaBalpha transcription and changes in steady-state mRNA, a greater component of IkappaBalpha mRNA was retained in the nucleus. These data indicate a selective role for PKCalpha in IL-1alpha-induced IkappaBalpha resynthesis, which is mediated, at least in part, by post-transcriptional control of mRNA export.

Activation of integrated provirus requires histone acetyltransferase. p300 and P/CAF are coactivators for HIV-1 Tat

A unique aspect of the retrovirus life cycle is the obligatory integration of the provirus into host cell chromosomes. Unlike viruses that do not integrate, retroviruses must conserve an ability to activate transcription from a chromatin context. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 encodes an unusual and an unusually potent transcriptional transactivator, Tat, which binds to a nascent viral leader RNA, TAR. The action of Tat has been well studied in various reductive model systems; however, the physiological mechanism through which Tat gains access to chromatin-associated proviral long terminal repeats (LTRs) is not understood. We show here that a nuclear histone acetyltransferase activity associates with Tat. Intracellularly, we found that Tat forms a ternary complex with p300 and P/CAF, two histone acetyltransferases (HATs). A murine cell defect in Tat transactivation of the HIV-1 LTR was linked to the reduced abundance of p300 and P/CAF. Thus, overexpression of p300 and P/CAF reconstituted Tat transactivation of the HIV-1 LTR in NIH3T3 cells to a level similar to that observed for human cells. By using transdominant p300 or P/CAF mutants that lack enzymatic activity, we delineated a requirement for the HAT component from the latter but not the former in Tat function. Finally, we observed that Tat-associated HAT is preferentially important for transactivation of integrated, but not unintegrated, HIV-1 LTR.

Identification and characterization of a tannic acid-responsive negative regulatory element in the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

Tannic acid, which comprises polyphenolic compounds from tea leaves, suppresses the glucocorticoid-induced gene expression of mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) integrated into 34I cells. To investigate whether this suppression is due to promoter responsiveness to tannic acid, we performed chloramphenicol acetyltransferase analysis transfecting a MMTV promoter containing a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase expression vector into mouse fibroblast L929 cells. Deletion analysis of the promoter region revealed that a 50-base pair (bp) region located downstream of the TATA element is responsible for the suppressive effect of tannic acid. The tannic acid-sensitive suppressibility was introduced into a thymidine kinase promoter by inserting the 50-bp region into the region on the 5'-upstream side of the promoter. Detailed point mutation analyses revealed that two elements, a 13-bp element and an ACTG motif in the 50-bp region, contribute to tannic acid sensitivity and promoter repressibility, respectively. Interestingly, this repressive ACTG motif is found in the human immunodeficiency virus promoter, the activity of which is also suppressed by tannic acid (Uchiumi, F., Maruta, H., Inoue, J., Yamamoto, T., and Tanuma, S. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220, 411-417). Furthermore, electrophoretic mobility shift analysis revealed that a protein factor(s) in nuclear extracts from L929 cells binds to the 50-bp region in a sequence-specific manner and that the amount of DNA-protein complex is increased by tannic acid treatment. Moreover, the negative regulatory sequence ACTG and the tannic acid-sensitive 13-bp element in this region were shown to be responsible for the formation of the DNA-protein complex by electrophoretic mobility shift analysis and footprint analyses. These findings suggest that the suppressive effect of tannic acid on MMTV gene expression is mediated by a protein factor(s) that binds to the negative regulatory element containing the common ACTG motif in a cooperative manner with the tannic acid-sensitive 13-bp element.

Intranuclear trafficking and gene targeting by members of the steroid/nuclear receptor superfamily

Upon binding to regulatory elements in mammalian chromosomes, steroid receptors induce specific transitions in the nucleoprotein structure of the template. These transitions reflect, in part, the reorganization of chromatin structure to permit interaction of secondary factors with target sequences in promoter regulatory regions. Steroid receptors represent a class of transcriptional activators that are able to interact with repressed nucleoprotein templates and recruit necessary activities for chromatin remodeling. The ligand-induced movement of nuclear receptors from inactive states, either in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus, to productive interactions with chromatin is complex and likely reflects the interaction with multiple protein complexes and subcellular structures. Regulation of gene expression by nuclear receptors is thus mediated through the subcellular distribution of inactive receptors, the redistribution of activated receptor complexes to appropriate nuclear domains, the reorganization of chromatin structures for interaction with soluble components of the nucleoplasm, and direct protein-protein contacts between receptors and the basal transcription apparatus.

Identification of glucocorticoid receptor domains necessary for transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter integrated in the genome

It has previously been determined that the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter when integrated in the genome assumes a defined chromatin structure which is disrupted upon addition of glucocorticoids. In contrast, a transiently introduced MMTV promoter has a random nucleoprotein structure. To reveal glucocorticoid receptor (GR) domains necessary for transcriptional activation of the MMTV promoter we compared the effects of mutations of the GR on transcriptional activation of the stably integrated versus transiently introduced MMTV promoter. For this purpose we generated a GR-negative cell line which has an MMTV promoter/reporter construct integrated in the genome and studied the transcriptional activation of this construct by different GR mutants introduced into the cells. Transcriptional activation of the integrated and transiently introduced promoter was achieved by the wild-type GR or a chimeric receptor in which the MR hormone-binding domain (HBD) replaced the GR HBD. In contrast, we found that deletion of the HBD of the GR or replacement of this region with the equivalent domain of the estrogen receptor produced receptors that were unable to activate the MMTV promoter integrated in the genome although these receptors efficiently activated the transiently introduced MMTV promoter. The HBD was not the sole determinant of MMTV transcriptional activation when integrated in the genome. Chimeric receptors which harbored the MR amino terminal domain or the wild-type MR were also unable to activate the integrated MMTV promoter. Taken together, these data indicate a rigid requirement for sequences in both the GR amino and the carboxy terminal domains for transcriptional activation of a hormone response element in the defined chromatin context of the MMTV promoter.

Antiprogestins mediate differential effects on glucocorticoid receptor remodeling of chromatin structure

We examined the mechanism(s) by which the progesterone receptor (PR) is able to inhibit glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activation from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter in vivo. Using specific hormone antagonists, we demonstrate that the PR complexed with an type II antiprogestin blocks glucocorticoid-induced activation of the MMTV promoter. However, when complexed with a type I antiprogestin the PR is unable to block glucocorticoid-induced activation. PR repression of GR activity results from the inhibition of the ability of the GR to remodel chromatin such that the antiprogestin-occupied/PR prevents the glucocorticoid induced assembly of a preinitiation complex at MMTV promoter. These experiments suggest that the specific chromatin organization of the MMTV promoter provides a mechanism for regulating cross-talk between the GR and PR in vivo.