Promoter activation via a cyclic AMP response element in vitro

Stimulation of the XPB ATP-dependent helicase by the beta subunit of TFIIE

TFIIE and TFIIH are essential for the promoter opening and escape that occurs as RNA polymerase II transits into early elongation. XPB, a subunit of TFIIH, contains an ATP-dependent helicase activity that is used in both of these processes. Here, we show that the smaller beta subunit of TFIIE stimulates the XPB helicase and ATPase activities. The larger alpha subunit can use its known inhibitory activity to moderate the stimulation by the beta subunit. Regions of TFIIE beta required for the helicase stimulation were identified. Mutants were constructed that are defective in stimulating the XPB helicase but still allow intact TFIIE to bind and recruit XPB and TFIIH to form the pre-initiation complex. In a test for the functional significance of the stimulatory effect of TFIIE beta, these mutant forms of TFIIE were shown to be defective in a transcription assay on linear DNA. The data suggest that the beta subunit of TFIIE is an ATPase and helicase co-factor that can assist the XPB subunit of TFIIH during transcription initiation and the transition to early elongation, enhancing the potential diversity of regulatory targets.

Mechanisms of basal and kinase-inducible transcription activation by CREB

The cAMP response element (CRE)-binding protein (CREB) stimulates basal transcription of CRE-containing genes and mediates induction of transcription upon phosphorylation by protein kinases. The basal activity of CREB maps to a carboxy-terminal constitutive activation domain (CAD), whereas phosphorylation and inducibility map to a central, kinase-inducible domain (KID). The CAD interacts with and recruits the promoter recognition factor TFIID through an interaction with a specific TATA-binding-protein-associated factor (TAF), dTAFII110/ hTAFII135. Interaction between the TAF and the CAD is mediated by a central cluster of hydrophobic amino acids, mutation of which disrupts TAF binding, polymerase recruitment, and transcription activation. Assessment of the contributions of the CAD and KID to recruitment of the polymerase complex versus enhancement of subsequent reaction steps (isomerization, promoter clearance, and reinitiation) showed that the CAD and P-KID act in a concerted mechanism to stimulate transcription. The CAD, but not the KID, mediated recruitment of a complex containing components of a transcription initiation complex, including pol II, IIB, and IID. However, the CAD was relatively ineffective in stimulating subsequent steps in the reaction mechanism. In contrast, phosphorylation of the KID in CREB effectively stimulated isomerization of the recruited polymerase complex and multiple-round transcription. A model for the activation of transcription by phosphorylated CREB is proposed, in which the polymerase is recruited by interaction of the CAD with TFIID and the recruited polymerase is activated further by phosphorylation of the KID in CREB.

Kinetic and mechanistic analysis of the RNA polymerase II transcrption reaction at the human interleukin-2 promoter

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a cytokine critical for the proper stimulation of T-cells during the mammalian immune response. Shortly after T-cell stimulation, transcription of the IL-2 gene is upregulated. Here, we studied the kinetic mechanism of basal transcription at the IL-2 promoter using a human in vitro RNA polymerase II transcription system. We experimentally divided the transcription reaction into discrete steps, including preinitiation complex formation, initiation, escape commitment, and promoter escape. Using pre-steady state approaches, we measured the rate at which each of these steps occurs. We found that the rate of functional preinitiation complex formation limits the overall rate of transcription at the IL-2 promoter under the conditions described here. Furthermore, we found that the recruitment of TFIIF and RNA polymerase II to a TFIID/TFIIA/TFIIB/promoter complex dictates the rate of preinitiation complex formation. The rate of synthesis of 28 nt RNA from preinitiation complexes was rapid compared to the rate of preinitiation complex formation. Moreover, we found that the synthesis of a four nucleotide RNA was necessary and sufficient to rapidly complete the escape commitment step of transcription at the IL-2 promoter. Comparative experiments with the adenovirus major late promoter revealed that, while the overall mechanism of transcription is the same at the two promoters, promoter sequence and/or architecture dictate the rate of promoter escape. We present a kinetic model for a single round of basal transcription at the IL-2 promoter that provides insight into mechanisms by which the IL-2 gene is transcriptionally regulated.

TATA-flanking sequences influence the rate and stability of TATA-binding protein and TFIIB binding

The kinetics of TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TFIIB binding were measured on a series of promoter constructs that had varying sequences within and flanking the TATA box. The flanking sequences were found to influence TBP stability even though they do not contact the protein. This occurs by altering the decay rate rather than the association rate. TFIIB association is accompanied by protein-protein cooperativity as indicated by the simultaneous release of both proteins in challenge experiments. The sequence of the TATA box and the sequences that flank it can influence the kinetics of the TFIIB.TBP.DNA complex. TFIIB can contribute to tighter TATA binding in two ways. It always slows the decay rate of TBP, but it can also increase the rate of association at promoters with certain combinations of TATA and flanking sequences. The results imply that the interplay between the TATA box and flanking elements leads to variations in the kinetics of preinitiation complex formation that may account for the observed effects of all of these diverse sequences on transcription.

Distinct cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) domains stimulate different steps in a concerted mechanism of transcription activation

Hormones and neurotransmitters rapidly change patterns of gene expression in target cells by activating protein kinases that phosphorylate and modify the activity of CREB and other transcription factors. Although CREB was initially characterized as mediating the response to cAMP, CREB phosphorylation and activation are stimulated by diverse extracellular signals and protein kinases in essentially all cells and tissues. CREB stimulates transcription through a constitutive activation domain (CAD), which interacts with the promoter recognition factor TFIID, and through a kinase-inducible domain (KID), when Ser-133 is phosphorylated. The present study provides new insight into the mechanism of activation by showing that each of the CREB domains contributes to transcription initiation by stimulating sequential steps in the transcription reaction. The CAD effectively assembled a polymerase complex, as evidenced by constitutive activation in vivo and stimulation of single-round transcription in vitro. In contrast, phosphorylation of the KID in CREB stimulated isomerization of the polymerase complex, as determined by abortive initiation, and promoter clearance and/or reinitiation, as measured by multiple rounds of transcription. Our results provide evidence for a new model for CREB-mediated induction through a concerted mechanism involving establishment of a polymerase complex by the CAD, followed by stimulation of isomerization, promoter clearance, and/or reinitiation by phosphorylated KID to enhance target gene transcription.

Roles for non-TATA core promoter sequences in transcription and factor binding

Sequence blocks within the core region were swapped among RNA polymerase II promoters to explore effects on transcription in vitro. The pair of blocks flanking TATA strongly influenced general transcription, with an additional effect on promoter activation. These flanking elements induced a change in the ratio of activated to basal transcription, whereas swapping TATA and initiator sequences only altered general transcription levels. Swapping the flanking blocks influenced binding by general transcription factors TBP and TFIIB. The results suggest that the architecture of the extended core sequence is important in determining promoter-specific effects on both general transcription levels and the tightness of regulation.

The use of ATP and initiating nucleotides during postrecruitment steps at the activated adenovirus E4 promoter

Permanganate probing has been used to follow the progress and ATP dependence of promoter opening during activated adenovirus E4 initiation and clearance. Using templates designed to restrict synthesis to defined positions, formation of a 3-nucleotide-long RNA was found to be sufficient to trigger expansion of the initial transcription bubble. This occurred by a discrete transition that expanded the downstream limit of melting from position 1 to 15. Subsequent clearance of the bubble from the promoter region also occurred without detectable intermediates. Thus, initial opening, extension, and the clearance of the promoter bubble appear to occur as discrete, unique transitions. The apparent K(m) values for these three steps were determined to be near 5, 9, and 50 microM, respectively. Comparison of these values with ATPase activities within known transcription factors raises the possibility that different activities could be responsible for each step.

Mechanism by which the IFN-beta enhanceosome activates transcription

We demonstrate that in contrast to previous findings by using simple synthetic promoters or activators, the natural IFN-beta enhanceosome activates transcription by causing a dramatic increase of the rate by which preinitiation complexes assemble at the promoter. This effect totally depends on the recruitment of the CBP-PolII holoenzyme by the enhanceosome, because its depletion from the extract decelerates the rate of transcription. However, addition of the CBP-PolII holoenzyme back to these extracts fully restores the speed by which the enhanceosome activates transcription. Strikingly, preincubation of the enhanceosome with the CBP-RNA PolII holoenzyme complex results in instant assembly of preinitiation complexes. In contrast, individual IFN-beta gene activators function solely by increasing the number of functional preinitiation complexes and not the rate of their assembly. Thus, fast recruitment of the CBP-RNA PolII holoenzyme complex is critical for the rapid activation of IFN-beta gene expression by virus infection.