Suppression of leu-500 mutation in topA+ Salmonella typhimurium strains. The promoter relay at work

Inhibition of the gyrA promoter by transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli

The E. coli gyrA promoter (P_gyrA) is a DNA supercoiling sensitive promoter, stimulated by relaxation of DNA templates, and inhibited by (−) DNA supercoiling in bacteria. However, whether P_gyrA can be inhibited by transient and localized transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) has not been fully examined. In this paper, using different DNA templates including the E. coli chromosome, we show that transient and localized TCDS strongly inhibits P_gyrA in E. coli. This result can be explained by a twin-supercoiled domain model of transcription in which (+) and (−) supercoiled domains are generated around the transcribing RNA polymerase. We also find that fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, can substantially increase the expression of the firefly luciferase under the control of the P_gyrA coupled to a divergent IPTG-inducible promoter in the presence of IPTG. This stimulation of P_gyrA by fluoroquinolones can be also explained by the twin-supercoiled domain model of transcription. This unique property of TCDS may be configured into a high throughput-screening (HTS) assay to identify antimicrobial compounds targeting bacterial DNA gyrase.

Transient and dynamic DNA supercoiling potently stimulates the leu-500 promoter in Escherichia coli

The inactive prokaryotic leu-500 promoter (P_leu-500) contains a single A-to-G point mutation in the -10 region of the leucine operon promoter, which causes leucine auxotrophy. This promoter can be activated by (-) DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli topA strains. However, whether this activation arises from global, permanent, or transient, dynamic supercoiling is still not fully understood. In this article, using a newly established in vivo system carrying a pair of divergently coupled promoters, i.e. an IPTG-inducible promoter and P_leu-500 that control the expression of lacZ and luc (the firefly luciferase gene), respectively, we demonstrate that transient, dynamic (-) DNA supercoiling provided by divergent transcription in both wild-type and topA strains can potently activate P_leu-500 We found that this activation depended on the promoter strength and the length of RNA transcripts, which are functional characteristics of transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) precisely predicted by the twin-supercoiled domain model of transcription in which a (+) supercoiled domain is produced ahead of the RNA polymerase and a (-) supercoiled domain behind it. We also demonstrate that TCDS can be generated on topologically open DNA molecules, i.e. linear DNA molecules, in Escherichia coli, suggesting that topological boundaries or barriers are not required for the production of TCDS in vivo This work demonstrates that transient, dynamic TCDS by RNA polymerases is a major chromosome remodeling force in E. coli and greatly influences the nearby, coupled promoters/transcription.

DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression

Although it has become routine to consider DNA in terms of its role as a carrier of genetic information, it is also an important contributor to the control of gene expression. This regulatory principle arises from its structural properties. DNA is maintained in an underwound state in most bacterial cells and this has important implications both for DNA storage in the nucleoid and for the expression of genetic information. Underwinding of the DNA through reduction in its linking number potentially imparts energy to the duplex that is available to drive DNA transactions, such as transcription, replication and recombination. The topological state of DNA also influences its affinity for some DNA binding proteins, especially in DNA sequences that have a high A + T base content. The underwinding of DNA by the ATP-dependent topoisomerase DNA gyrase creates a continuum between metabolic flux, DNA topology and gene expression that underpins the global response of the genome to changes in the intracellular and external environments. These connections describe a fundamental and generalised mechanism affecting global gene expression that underlies the specific control of transcription operating through conventional transcription factors. This mechanism also provides a basal level of control for genes acquired by horizontal DNA transfer, assisting microbial evolution, including the evolution of pathogenic bacteria.

DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression

Although it has become routine to consider DNA in terms of its role as a carrier of genetic information, it is also an important contributor to the control of gene expression. This regulatory principle arises from its structural properties. DNA is maintained in an underwound state in most bacterial cells and this has important implications both for DNA storage in the nucleoid and for the expression of genetic information. Underwinding of the DNA through reduction in its linking number potentially imparts energy to the duplex that is available to drive DNA transactions, such as transcription, replication and recombination. The topological state of DNA also influences its affinity for some DNA binding proteins, especially in DNA sequences that have a high A + T base content. The underwinding of DNA by the ATP-dependent topoisomerase DNA gyrase creates a continuum between metabolic flux, DNA topology and gene expression that underpins the global response of the genome to changes in the intracellular and external environments. These connections describe a fundamental and generalised mechanism affecting global gene expression that underlies the specific control of transcription operating through conventional transcription factors. This mechanism also provides a basal level of control for genes acquired by horizontal DNA transfer, assisting microbial evolution, including the evolution of pathogenic bacteria.

Biosynthesis and Regulation of the Branched-Chain Amino Acids†

This review focuses on more recent studies concerning the systems biology of branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis, that is, the pathway-specific and global metabolic and genetic regulatory networks that enable the cell to adjust branched-chain amino acid synthesis rates to changing nutritional and environmental conditions. It begins with an overview of the enzymatic steps and metabolic regulatory mechanisms of the pathways and descriptions of the genetic regulatory mechanisms of the individual operons of the isoleucine-leucine-valine (ilv) regulon. This is followed by more-detailed discussions of recent evidence that global control mechanisms that coordinate the expression of the operons of this regulon with one another and the growth conditions of the cell are mediated by changes in DNA supercoiling that occur in response to changes in cellular energy charge levels that, in turn, are modulated by nutrient and environmental signals. Since the parallel pathways for isoleucine and valine biosynthesis are catalyzed by a single set of enzymes, and because the AHAS-catalyzed reaction is the first step specific for valine biosynthesis but the second step of isoleucine biosynthesis, valine inhibition of a single enzyme for this enzymatic step might compromise the cell for isoleucine or result in the accumulation of toxic intermediates. The operon-specific regulatory mechanisms of the operons of the ilv regulon are discussed in the review followed by a consideration and brief review of global regulatory proteins such as integration host factor (IHF), Lrp, and CAP (CRP) that affect the expression of these operons.

The Subtleties and Contrasts of the LeuO Regulator in Salmonella Typhi: Implications in the Immune Response

Salmonella are facultative intracellular pathogens. Salmonella infection occurs mainly by expression of two Salmonella pathogenicity Islands (SPI-1 and SPI-2). SPI-1 encodes transcriptional factors that participate in the expression of virulence factors encoded in the island. However, there are transcriptional factors encoded outside the island that also participate in the expression of SPI-1-encoded genes. Upon infection, bacteria are capable of avoiding the host immune response with several strategies that involve several virulence factors under the control of transcriptional regulators. Interestingly, LeuO a transcriptional global regulator which is encoded outside of any SPI, is proposed to be part of a complex regulatory network that involves expression of several genes that help bacteria to survive stress conditions and, also, induces the expression of porins that have been shown to be immunogens and can thus be considered as antigenic candidates for acellular vaccines. Hence, the understanding of the LeuO regulon implies a role of bacterial genetic regulation in determining the host immune response.

The Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi LeuO global regulator forms tetramers: residues involved in oligomerization, DNA binding, and transcriptional regulation

LeuO is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) that has been described to be a global regulator in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, since it positively and negatively regulates the expression of genes involved in multiple biological processes. LeuO is comprised of an N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD) with a winged helix-turn-helix (wHTH) motif and of a long linker helix (LH) involved in dimerization that connects the DBD with the C-terminal effector-binding domain (EBD) or regulatory domain (RD; which comprises subdomains RD-I and RD-II). Here we show that the oligomeric structure of LeuO is a tetramer that binds with high affinity to DNA. A collection of single amino acid substitutions in the LeuO DBD indicated that this region is involved in oligomerization, in positive and negative regulation, as well as in DNA binding. Mutants with point mutations in the central and C-terminal regions of RD-I were affected in transcriptional activation. Deletion of the RD-II and RD-I C-terminal subdomains affected not only oligomerization but also DNA interaction, showing that they are involved in positive and negative regulation. Together, these data demonstrate that not only the C terminus but also the DBD of LeuO is involved in oligomer formation; therefore, each LeuO domain appears to act synergistically to maintain its regulatory functions in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi.

Regulation of Salmonella enterica pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) by the LysR-type regulator LeuO

LeuO is a quiescent LysR-type regulator belonging to the H-NS regulon. Activation of leuO transcription represses expression of pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and inhibits invasion of epithelial cells. Loss of HilE suppresses LeuO-mediated downregulation of SPI-1. Activation of leuO transcription reduces the level of HilD protein, and loss of HilE restores the wild type HilD level. Hence, LeuO-mediated downregulation of SPI-1 may involve inhibition of HilD activity by HilE, a view consistent with the fact that HilE is a HilD inhibitor. In vivo analyses using β-galactosidase fusions indicate that LeuO activates hilE transcription. In vitro analyses by slot blotting, electrophoretic mobility shift analysis and DNase I footprinting show that LeuO binds the hilE promoter region. Although residual SPI-1 repression by LeuO is observed in the absence of HilE, the LeuO-HilE-HilD 'pathway' appears to be the major mechanism. Because both leuO and SPI-1 are repressed by H-NS, activation of leuO transcription may provide a backup mechanism for SPI-1 repression under conditions that impair H-NS-mediated silencing.

Determining DNA supercoiling enthalpy by isothermal titration calorimetry

DNA supercoiling plays a critical role in certain essential DNA transactions, such as DNA replication, recombination, and transcription. For this reason, exploring energetics of DNA supercoiling is fundamentally important for understanding its biological functions. In this paper, using a unique property of DNA intercalators, such as ethidium bromide and daunorubicin, which bind to supercoiled, nicked, and relaxed DNA templates with different DNA-binding enthalpies, we determined DNA supercoiling enthalpy of plasmid pXXZ6, a 4.5 kb plasmid to be about 11.5 kcal/mol per linking number change. This determination allowed us to partition the DNA supercoiling free energy into enthalpic and entropic contributions where the unfavorable DNA supercoiling free energy exclusively originated from the large positive supercoiling enthalpy and was compensated by a large, favorable entropy term (TΔS).

Regulation of the yjjQ-bglJ operon, encoding LuxR-type transcription factors, and the divergent yjjP gene by H-NS and LeuO

The yjjQ and bglJ genes encode LuxR-type transcription factors conserved in several enterobacterial species. YjjQ is a potential virulence factor in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. BglJ counteracts the silencing of the bgl (beta-glucoside) operon by H-NS in E. coli K-12. Here we show that yjjQ and bglJ form an operon carried by E. coli K-12, whose expression is repressed by the histone-like nucleoid structuring (H-NS) protein. The LysR-type transcription factor LeuO counteracts this repression. Furthermore, the yjjP gene, encoding a membrane protein of unknown function and located upstream in divergent orientation to the yjjQ-bglJ operon, is likewise repressed by H-NS. Mapping of the promoters as well as the H-NS and LeuO binding sites within the 555-bp intergenic region revealed that H-NS binds to the center of the AT-rich regulatory region and distal to the divergent promoters. LeuO sites map to the center and to positions distal to the yjjQ promoters, while one LeuO binding site overlaps with the divergent yjjP promoter. This latter LeuO site is required for full derepression of the yjjQ promoters. The arrangement of regulatory sites suggests that LeuO restructures the nucleoprotein complex formed by H-NS. Furthermore, the data support the conclusion that LeuO, whose expression is likewise repressed by H-NS and which is a virulence factor in Salmonella enterica, is a master regulator that among other loci, also controls the yjjQ-bglJ operon and thus indirectly the presumptive targets of YjjQ and BglJ.

LeuO protein delimits the transcriptionally active and repressive domains on the bacterial chromosome

LeuO protein relieves bacterial gene silencer AT8-mediated transcriptional repression as part of a promoter relay mechanism found in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster. The gene silencing activity has recently been characterized as a nucleoprotein filament initiated at the gene silencer. In this gene locus, the nucleoprotein filament cis-spreads toward the target leuO promoter and results in the repression of the leuO gene. Although the cis-spreading nature of the transcriptionally repressive nucleoprotein filament has been revealed, the mechanism underlying LeuO-mediated gene silencing relief remains unknown. We have demonstrated here that LeuO functions analogously to the eukaryotic boundary element that delimits the transcriptionally active and repressive domains on the chromosome by blocking the cis-spreading pathway of the transcriptionally repressive heterochromatin. Given that one LeuO-binding site is positioned between the gene silencer and the target promoter, the simultaneous presence of a second LeuO-binding site synergistically enhances the blockade, resulting in a cooperative increase in LeuO-mediated gene silencing relief. A known DNA loop-forming protein, the lac repressor (LacI), was used to confirm that cooperative protein binding via DNA looping is responsible for the blocking synergy. Indeed, a distal LeuO site located downstream cooperates with the LeuO sites located upstream of the leuO gene, resulting in synergistic relief for the repressed leuO gene via looping out the intervening DNA between LeuO sites in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster.

A cis-spreading nucleoprotein filament is responsible for the gene silencing activity found in the promoter relay mechanism

Transcription-generated DNA supercoiling plays a decisive role in a promoter relay mechanism for the coordinated expression of genes in the Salmonella typhimurium ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster. A similar mechanism also operates to control expression of the genes in the Escherichia coli ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster. However, the mechanism underlying the DNA supercoiling effect remained elusive. A bacterial gene silencer AT8 was found to be important for the repression state of the leuO gene as part of the promoter relay mechanism. In this communication, we demonstrated that the gene silencer AT8 is a nucleation site for recruiting histone-like nucleoid structuring protein to form a cis-spreading nucleoprotein filament that is responsible for silencing of the leuO gene. With a DNA geometric similarity rather than a DNA sequence specificity, the E. coli gene silencer EAT6 was capable of replacing the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein nucleation function of the S. typhimurium gene silencer AT8 for the leuO gene silencing. The interchangeability between DNA geometrical elements for supporting the silencing activity in the region is consistent with a previous finding that a neighboring transcription activity determines the outcome of the gene silencing activity. The geometric requirement, which was revealed for this silencing activity, explains the decisive role of transcription-generated DNA supercoiling found in the promoter relay mechanism.

DNA supercoiling and transcription control: a model from the study of suppression of the leu-500 mutation in Salmonella typhimurium topA- strains

DNA supercoiling is known to modulate gene expression. The functional relationship between DNA supercoiling and transcription initiation has been established genetically and biochemically. The molecular mechanism whereby DNA supercoiling regulates gene expression remains unclear however. Quite commonly, the same gene responds to the same DNA supercoiling change differently when the gene is positioned at different locations. Such strong positional effects on gene expression suggest that rather than the overall DNA supercoiling change, the variation of DNA supercoiling at a local site might be important for transcription control. We have started to understand the local DNA supercoiling dynamic on the chromosome. As a primary source of local DNA supercoiling fluctuation, transcription-driven DNA supercoiling is important in determining the chromosome supercoiling dynamic and theoretically, therefore, for transcription control as well. Indeed, by studying the coordinated expression of genes in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster, we found that transcription-driven DNA supercoiling governs the expression of a group of functionally related genes in a sequential manner. Based on the findings in this model system, we put forward the possible mechanisms whereby DNA supercoiling plays its role in transcription control.

LeuO-mediated transcriptional derepression

To understand the coordination of gene expression in the Salmonella typhimurium ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster, we had previously identified a 72-bp AT-rich (78% A+T) DNA sequence element, AT4, which was capable of silencing transcription in a promoter nonspecific manner. LeuO protein provided in trans relieved (derepressed) AT4-mediated gene silencing (transcriptional repression), but underlying mechanisms remained unclear. In the present communication, the 72-bp DNA sequence element is further dissected into two functional elements, AT7 and AT8. LeuO binds to the 25-bp AT7, which lies closest to the leuO promoter in the AT4 DNA. After deletion of the AT7 DNA sequence responsible for LeuO binding from AT4, the remaining 47-bp AT-rich (85% A+T) DNA sequence, termed AT8, retains the full bi-directional gene-silencing activity, which is no longer relieved by LeuO. LeuO-mediated transcriptional derepression is restored when the LeuO binding site, AT7, is placed within close proximity to the gene silencer AT8. As a pair of functionally coupled transcription elements, the presence of an equal copy number of AT7 and AT8 within proximity is important for the transcription control. The characterization provides clues for future elucidation of the molecular details whereby LeuO negates the gene-silencing activity.

A 72-base pair AT-rich DNA sequence element functions as a bacterial gene silencer

We have previously demonstrated that sequential activation of the bacterial ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster involves a promoter-relay mechanism. In the current study, we show that the final activation of the leuABCD operon is through a transcriptional derepression mechanism. The leuABCD operon is transcriptionally repressed by the presence of a 318-base pair AT-rich upstream element. LeuO is required for derepressing the repressed leuABCD operon. Deletion analysis of the repressive effect of the 318-bp element has led to the identification of a 72-bp AT-rich (78% A+T) DNA sequence element, AT4, which is capable of silencing a number of unrelated promoters in addition to the leuABCD promoter. AT4-mediated gene silencing is orientation-independent and occurs within a distance of 300 base pairs. Furthermore, an increased gene-silencing effect was observed with a tandemly repeated AT4 dimer. The possible mechanism of AT4-mediated gene silencing in bacteria is discussed.

LeuO expression in response to starvation for branched-chain amino acids

The recently identified role of LeuO in the regulation of transcription has prompted us to search for the specific function(s) of LeuO in bacterial physiology. The cryptic nature of expression of leuO has previously limited such analysis. A conditional leuO expression was found when bacteria enter stationary phase and was shown to be guanosine 3',5'-bispyrophosphate-dependent. Multiple physiological events, including the stringent response, are induced upon the increase of the bacterial stress signal, guanosine 3',5'-bispyrophosphate. In this study, we tested whether LeuO was directly involved in the bacterial stringent response. LeuO was shown to be indispensable for growth resumption following a 2-h growth arrest caused by starvation for branched-chain amino acids in an E. coli K-12 relA1 strain. This result supports a functional role for LeuO in the bacterial stringent response.

ppGpp-dependent leuO expression in bacteria under stress

Despite the known potential transcription regulatory role of leuO gene product, LeuO, the condition when leuO expresses during bacterial growth cycle remains unclear. Mechanistically, leuO expression was shown to be part of promoter relay mechanism, however, the factor(s) responsible for the regulation of leuO expression is not known. Combining Northern and Western results, we demonstrate in the present communication that leuO expression is normally low and enhanced when bacteria are in transition from exponential growth to stationary phase. The stationary phase-associated leuO expression is ppGpp dependent and rpoS (sigma(s) factor) independent.

Large-scale effects of transcriptional DNA supercoiling in vivo

The scale of negative DNA supercoiling generated by transcription in Top(+) Escherichia coli cells was assessed from the efficiency of cruciform formation upstream of a regulated promoter. An increase in negative supercoiling upon promoter induction led to cruciform formation, which was quantitatively measured by chemical probing of intracellular DNA. By placing a cruciform-forming sequence at varying distances from the promoter, we found that the half-dissociation length of transcription supercoiling wave is approximately 800 bp. This is the first proof that transcription can affect DNA structure on such a remarkably large scale in vivo. Moreover, cooperative binding of the cI repressor to the upstream promoter DNA did not preclude efficient diffusion of transcriptional supercoiling. Finally, our plasmids appeared to contain discrete domains of DNA supercoiling, defined by the features and relative orientation of different promoters.

Escherichia coli Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) does not directly regulate expression of the leu operon promoter

Studies by R. Lin et al. (J. Bacteriol. 174:1948-1955, 1992) suggested that the Escherichia coli leu operon might be a member of the Lrp regulon. Their results were obtained with a leucine auxotroph; in leucine prototrophs grown in a medium lacking leucine, there was little difference in leu operon expression between lrp(+) and lrp strains. Furthermore, when leuP-lacZ transcriptional fusions that lacked the leu attenuator were used, expression from the leu promoter varied less than twofold between lrp(+) and lrp strains, irrespective of whether or not excess leucine was added to the medium. The simplest explanation of the observations of Lin et al. is that the known elevated leucine transport capacity of lrp strains (S. A. Haney et al., J. Bacteriol. 174:108-115, 1992) leads to very high intracellular levels of leucine for strains grown with leucine, resulting in the superattenuation of leu operon expression.

DNA structure and transcription

Regulation of transcription occurs through complex interactions of RNA polymerase and accessory proteins with specific DNA sequences and with each other. The DNA template topology influences the interaction of RNA polymerase with the promoter and its response to repressors, activators and the intracellular milieu through the formation of altered DNA structures or of nucleoprotein complexes. Recent developments on the role of DNA structures in transcription regulation are discussed.