1
|
Zhao T, Vvedenskaya IO, Lai WKM, Basu S, Pugh BF, Nickels BE, Kaplan CD. Ssl2/TFIIH function in transcription start site scanning by RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. eLife 2021; 10:e71013. [PMID: 34652274 PMCID: PMC8589449 DOI: 10.7554/elife.71013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) selects transcription start sites (TSSs) by a unidirectional scanning process. During scanning, a preinitiation complex (PIC) assembled at an upstream core promoter initiates at select positions within a window ~40-120 bp downstream. Several lines of evidence indicate that Ssl2, the yeast homolog of XPB and an essential and conserved subunit of the general transcription factor (GTF) TFIIH, drives scanning through its DNA-dependent ATPase activity, therefore potentially controlling both scanning rate and scanning extent (processivity). To address questions of how Ssl2 functions in promoter scanning and interacts with other initiation activities, we leveraged distinct initiation-sensitive reporters to identify novel ssl2 alleles. These ssl2 alleles, many of which alter residues conserved from yeast to human, confer either upstream or downstream TSS shifts at the model promoter ADH1 and genome-wide. Specifically, tested ssl2 alleles alter TSS selection by increasing or narrowing the distribution of TSSs used at individual promoters. Genetic interactions of ssl2 alleles with other initiation factors are consistent with ssl2 allele classes functioning through increasing or decreasing scanning processivity but not necessarily scanning rate. These alleles underpin a residue interaction network that likely modulates Ssl2 activity and TFIIH function in promoter scanning. We propose that the outcome of promoter scanning is determined by two functional networks, the first being Pol II activity and factors that modulate it to determine initiation efficiency within a scanning window, and the second being Ssl2/TFIIH and factors that modulate scanning processivity to determine the width of the scanning widow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhao
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| | - Irina O Vvedenskaya
- Department of Genetics and Waksman Institute, Rutgers UniversityPiscatawayUnited States
| | - William KM Lai
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell UniversityIthacaUnited States
| | - Shrabani Basu
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| | - B Franklin Pugh
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell UniversityIthacaUnited States
| | - Bryce E Nickels
- Department of Genetics and Waksman Institute, Rutgers UniversityPiscatawayUnited States
| | - Craig D Kaplan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qiu C, Jin H, Vvedenskaya I, Llenas JA, Zhao T, Malik I, Visbisky AM, Schwartz SL, Cui P, Čabart P, Han KH, Lai WKM, Metz RP, Johnson CD, Sze SH, Pugh BF, Nickels BE, Kaplan CD. Universal promoter scanning by Pol II during transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 2020; 21:132. [PMID: 32487207 PMCID: PMC7265651 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02040-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of eukaryotic promoters utilize multiple transcription start sites (TSSs). How multiple TSSs are specified at individual promoters across eukaryotes is not understood for most species. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a pre-initiation complex (PIC) comprised of Pol II and conserved general transcription factors (GTFs) assembles and opens DNA upstream of TSSs. Evidence from model promoters indicates that the PIC scans from upstream to downstream to identify TSSs. Prior results suggest that TSS distributions at promoters where scanning occurs shift in a polar fashion upon alteration in Pol II catalytic activity or GTF function. RESULTS To determine the extent of promoter scanning across promoter classes in S. cerevisiae, we perturb Pol II catalytic activity and GTF function and analyze their effects on TSS usage genome-wide. We find that alterations to Pol II, TFIIB, or TFIIF function widely alter the initiation landscape consistent with promoter scanning operating at all yeast promoters, regardless of promoter class. Promoter architecture, however, can determine the extent of promoter sensitivity to altered Pol II activity in ways that are predicted by a scanning model. CONCLUSIONS Our observations coupled with previous data validate key predictions of the scanning model for Pol II initiation in yeast, which we term the shooting gallery. In this model, Pol II catalytic activity and the rate and processivity of Pol II scanning together with promoter sequence determine the distribution of TSSs and their usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenxi Qiu
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Present Address: Department of Medicine, Division of Translational Therapeutics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Huiyan Jin
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
| | - Irina Vvedenskaya
- Waksman Institute of Microbiology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Jordi Abante Llenas
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3128, USA
- Present Address: Whitaker Biomedical Engineering Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Tingting Zhao
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
| | - Indranil Malik
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Present Address: Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Alex M Visbisky
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
| | - Scott L Schwartz
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Ping Cui
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
| | - Pavel Čabart
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Present Address: First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, BIOCEV, 252 42, Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Kang Hoo Han
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | - William K M Lai
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
- Present Address: Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, 458 Biotechnology, Cornell University, New York, 14853, USA
| | - Richard P Metz
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Charles D Johnson
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Sing-Hoi Sze
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3127, USA
| | - B Franklin Pugh
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
- Present Address: Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, 458 Biotechnology, Cornell University, New York, 14853, USA
| | - Bryce E Nickels
- Waksman Institute of Microbiology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Craig D Kaplan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaplan CD. Basic mechanisms of RNA polymerase II activity and alteration of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2012; 1829:39-54. [PMID: 23022618 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2012] [Revised: 09/18/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and all RNA polymerases for that matter, may be understood as comprising two cycles. The first cycle relates to the basic mechanism of the transcription process wherein Pol II must select the appropriate nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) substrate complementary to the DNA template, catalyze phosphodiester bond formation, and translocate to the next position on the DNA template. Performing this cycle in an iterative fashion allows the synthesis of RNA chains that can be over one million nucleotides in length in some larger eukaryotes. Overlaid upon this enzymatic cycle, transcription may be divided into another cycle of three phases: initiation, elongation, and termination. Each of these phases has a large number of associated transcription factors that function to promote or regulate the gene expression process. Complicating matters, each phase of the latter transcription cycle are coincident with cotranscriptional RNA processing events. Additionally, transcription takes place within a highly dynamic and regulated chromatin environment. This chromatin environment is radically impacted by active transcription and associated chromatin modifications and remodeling, while also functioning as a major platform for Pol II regulation. This review will focus on our basic knowledge of the Pol II transcription mechanism, and how altered Pol II activity impacts gene expression in vivo in the model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: RNA Polymerase II Transcript Elongation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig D Kaplan
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2128, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang C, Ponticelli AS. Evidence that RNA polymerase II and not TFIIB is responsible for the difference in transcription initiation patterns between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:6495-507. [PMID: 22510268 PMCID: PMC3413132 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The basal eukaryotic transcription machinery for protein coding genes is highly conserved from unicellular yeast to higher eukaryotes. Whereas TATA-containing promoters in human cells usually contain a single transcription start site (TSS) located ∼30 bp downstream of the TATA element, transcription in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae typically initiates at multiple sites within a window ranging from 30 to 70 bp or 40 to 200 bp downstream of a TATA element, respectively. By exchanging highly purified factors between reconstituted S. pombe and S. cerevisiae transcription systems, we confirmed previous observations that the dual exchange of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) confer the distinct initiation patterns between these yeast species. Surprisingly, however, further genetic and biochemical assays of TFIIB chimeras revealed that TFIIB and the proposed B-finger/reader domain do not play a role in determining the distinct initiation patterns between S. pombe and S. cerevisiae, but rather, these patterns are solely due to differences in RNAPII. These results are discussed within the context of a proposed model for the mechanistic coupling of the efficiency of early phosphodiester bond formation during productive TSS utilization and intrinsic elongation proficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yang
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214-3000, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deng W, Roberts SGE. TFIIB and the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Chromosoma 2007; 116:417-29. [PMID: 17593382 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-007-0113-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2007] [Revised: 05/21/2007] [Accepted: 05/21/2007] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Accurate transcription of a gene by RNA polymerase II requires the assembly of a group of general transcription factors at the promoter. The general transcription factor TFIIB plays a central role in preinitiation complex assembly, providing a bridge between promoter-bound TFIID and RNA polymerase II. TFIIB makes extensive contact with the core promoter via two independent DNA-recognition modules. In addition to interacting with other general transcription factors, TFIIB directly modulates the catalytic center of RNA polymerase II in the transcription complex. Moreover, TFIIB has been proposed as a target of transcriptional activator proteins that act to stimulate preinitiation complex assembly. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of these activities of TFIIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wensheng Deng
- Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, The Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
In eukaryotes, the core promoter serves as a platform for the assembly of transcription preinitiation complex (PIC) that includes TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH, and RNA polymerase II (pol II), which function collectively to specify the transcription start site. PIC formation usually begins with TFIID binding to the TATA box, initiator, and/or downstream promoter element (DPE) found in most core promoters, followed by the entry of other general transcription factors (GTFs) and pol II through either a sequential assembly or a preassembled pol II holoenzyme pathway. Formation of this promoter-bound complex is sufficient for a basal level of transcription. However, for activator-dependent (or regulated) transcription, general cofactors are often required to transmit regulatory signals between gene-specific activators and the general transcription machinery. Three classes of general cofactors, including TBP-associated factors (TAFs), Mediator, and upstream stimulatory activity (USA)-derived positive cofactors (PC1/PARP-1, PC2, PC3/DNA topoisomerase I, and PC4) and negative cofactor 1 (NC1/HMGB1), normally function independently or in combination to fine-tune the promoter activity in a gene-specific or cell-type-specific manner. In addition, other cofactors, such as TAF1, BTAF1, and negative cofactor 2 (NC2), can also modulate TBP or TFIID binding to the core promoter. In general, these cofactors are capable of repressing basal transcription when activators are absent and stimulating transcription in the presence of activators. Here we review the roles of these cofactors and GTFs, as well as TBP-related factors (TRFs), TAF-containing complexes (TFTC, SAGA, SLIK/SALSA, STAGA, and PRC1) and TAF variants, in pol II-mediated transcription, with emphasis on the events occurring after the chromatin has been remodeled but prior to the formation of the first phosphodiester bond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Thomas
- Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106-4935, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pal M, Ponticelli AS, Luse DS. The role of the transcription bubble and TFIIB in promoter clearance by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell 2005; 19:101-10. [PMID: 15989968 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2004] [Revised: 04/20/2005] [Accepted: 05/19/2005] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We have studied promoter clearance at a series of RNA polymerase II promoters with varying spacing of the TATA box and start site. We find that regardless of promoter spacing, the upstream edge of the transcription bubble forms 20 bp from TATA. The bubble expands downstream until 18 bases are unwound and the RNA is at least 7 nt long, at which point the upstream approximately 8 bases of the bubble abruptly reanneal (bubble collapse). If either bubble size or transcript length is insufficient, bubble collapse cannot occur. Bubble collapse coincides with the end of the requirement for the TFIIH helicase for efficient transcript elongation. We also provide evidence that bubble collapse suppresses pausing at +7 to +9 caused by the presence of the B finger segment of TFIIB within the complex. Our results indicate that bubble collapse defines the RNA polymerase II promoter clearance transition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahadeb Pal
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glossop JA, Dafforn TR, Roberts SGE. A conformational change in TFIIB is required for activator-mediated assembly of the preinitiation complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1829-35. [PMID: 15037660 PMCID: PMC390344 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2004] [Revised: 03/04/2004] [Accepted: 03/04/2004] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
TFIIB plays a pivotal role during assembly of the RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex. TFIIB is composed of two domains that engage in an intramolecular interaction that can be disrupted by the VP16 activation domain. In this study, we describe a novel human TFIIB derivative harbouring two point mutations in the highly conserved N-terminal charged cluster domain. This mutant, TFIIB R53E:R66E, exhibits an enhanced affinity in its intramolecular interaction when compared with wild-type TFIIB. Consistent with this, the mutant displays a significantly reduced affinity for VP16. However, its ability to complex with TATA-binding protein at a model promoter is equivalent to that of wild-type TFIIB. Furthermore, this TFIIB derivative is able to support high order preinitiation complex assembly in the absence of an activator. Strikingly though, an activator fails to recruit the TFIIB mutant to the promoter. Taken together, our results show that a TFIIB conformational change is critical for the formation of activator-dependent transcription complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Glossop
- School of Biological Sciences, The Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zheng L, Hoeflich KP, Elsby LM, Ghosh M, Roberts SGE, Ikura M. FRET evidence for a conformational change in TFIIB upon TBP-DNA binding. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004; 271:792-800. [PMID: 14764096 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.03983.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
As a critical step of the preinitiation complex assembly in transcription, the general transcription factor TFIIB forms a complex with the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) bound to a promoter element. Transcriptional activators such as the herpes simplex virus VP16 facilitate this complex formation through conformational activation of TFIIB, a focal molecule of transcriptional initiation and activation. Here, we used fluorescence resonance energy transfer to investigate conformational states of human TFIIB fused to enhanced cyan fluorescent protein and enhanced yellow fluorescent protein at its N- and C-terminus, respectively. A significant reduction in fluorescence resonance energy transfer ratio was observed when this fusion protein, hereafter named CYIIB, was mixed with promoter-loaded TBP. The rate for the TFIIB-TBP-DNA complex formation is accelerated drastically by GAL4-VP16 and is also dependent on the type of promoter sequences. These results provide compelling evidence for a 'closed-to-open' conformational change of TFIIB upon binding to the TBP-DNA complex, which probably involves alternation of the spatial orientation between the N-terminal zinc ribbon domain and the C-terminal conserved core domain responsible for direct interactions with TBP and a DNA element.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le Zheng
- Division of Molecular and Structural Biology, Ontario Cancer Institute and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Albrecht RA, Jang HK, Kim SK, O'Callaghan DJ. Direct interaction of TFIIB and the IE protein of equine herpesvirus 1 is required for maximal trans-activation function. Virology 2004; 316:302-12. [PMID: 14644612 DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Recently, we reported that the immediate-early (IE) protein of equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) associates with transcription factor TFIIB [J. Virol. 75 (2001), 10219]. In the current study, the IE protein purified as a glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was shown to interact directly with purified TFIIB in GST-pulldown assays. A panel of TFIIB mutants employed in protein-binding assays revealed that residues 125 to 174 within the first direct repeat of TFIIB mediate its interaction with the IE protein. This interaction is physiologically relevant as transient transfection assays demonstrated that (1). exogenous native TFIIB did not perturb IE protein function, and (2). ectopic expression of a TFIIB mutant that lacked the IE protein interactive domain significantly diminished the ability of the IE protein to trans-activate EHV-1 promoters. These results suggest that an interaction of the IE protein with TFIIB is an important aspect of the regulatory role of the IE protein in the trans-activation of EHV-1 promoters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy A Albrecht
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130-3932, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ziegler LM, Khaperskyy DA, Ammerman ML, Ponticelli AS. Yeast RNA polymerase II lacking the Rpb9 subunit is impaired for interaction with transcription factor IIF. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:48950-6. [PMID: 14522989 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m309656200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that transcription factors IIB (TFIIB), IIF (TFIIF), and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) play important roles in determining the position of mRNA 5'-ends in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast strains containing a deletion of the small, nonessential Rpb9 subunit of RNAPII exhibit an upstream shift in the positions of mRNA 5'-ends, whereas mutation of the large subunit of yeast TFIIF (Tfg1) can suppress downstream shifts that are conferred by mutations in TFIIB. In this study, we report an approach for the production of functional recombinant yeast holo-TFIIF (Tfg1-Tfg2 complex) and use of the recombinant protein in both reconstituted transcription assays and gel mobility shifts in order to investigate the biochemical alterations associated with the deltaRpb9 polymerase. The results demonstrated that upstream shifts in the positions of mRNA 5'-ends could be conferred by the deltaRpb9 RNAPII in transcription reactions reconstituted with highly purified yeast general transcription factors and, importantly, that these shifts are associated with an impaired interaction between the DeltaRpb9 polymerase and TFIIF. Potential mechanisms by which an altered interaction between the DeltaRpb9 RNAPII and TFIIF confers an upstream shift in the positions of mRNA 5'-ends are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn M Ziegler
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14214-3000, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zeng X, Zhang D, Dorsey M, Ma J. Hypomutable regions of yeast TFIIB in a unigenic evolution test represent structural domains. Gene 2003; 309:49-56. [PMID: 12727357 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00492-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
As genome sequences of many organisms - including humans - are being decoded, there is a great need for genetic tools to analyze newly discovered genes/proteins. A 'unigenic evolution' approach has been previously proposed for dissecting protein domains, which is based on the assumption that functionally important regions of a protein may tolerate missense mutations less well than other regions. We describe a unigenic evolution analysis of general transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) - a protein that is well characterized both structurally and functionally - to better understand the molecular basis of this genetic approach. The overall distribution profile of hypomutable regions within yeast TFIIB correlates extremely well with the known compact structural domains, suggesting that the unigenic evolution approach can help reveal structural properties of a protein. We further show that a small region located immediately carboxyl-terminal to the zinc ribbon motif is functionally important despite its strong hypermutability. Our study further demonstrates the usefulness of the unigenic evolution approach in dissecting protein domains, but suggests that the mutability of different regions of a protein in such a test is determined primarily by their structural properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Zeng
- Division of Developmental Biology, Children's Hospital Research Foundation, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The functions of the basal transcription factors involved in RNA polymerase II dependent transcription have been the focus of many years of biochemical analysis. Recent advances have shed some light on the structure of these factors, how conformational changes and intramolecular interactions regulate activity, and have revealed an expanded role for TFIIH in nuclear transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Reese
- Penn State University, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 203 Althouse lab, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang DY, Carson DJ, Ma J. The role of TFIIB-RNA polymerase II interaction in start site selection in yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:3078-85. [PMID: 12136090 PMCID: PMC135743 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkf422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2002] [Revised: 05/20/2002] [Accepted: 05/20/2002] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have established a critical role of both TFIIB and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) in start site selection in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, it remains unclear how the TFIIB-RNAPII interaction impacts on this process since such an interaction can potentially influence both preinitiation complex (PIC) stability and conformation. In this study, we further investigate the role of TFIIB in start site selection by characterizing our newly generated TFIIB mutants, two of which exhibit a novel upstream shift of start sites in vivo. We took advantage of an artificial recruitment system in which an RNAPII holoenzyme component is covalently linked to a DNA-binding domain for more direct and stable recruitment. We show that TFIIB mutations can exert their effects on start site selection in such an artificial recruitment system even though it has a relaxed requirement for TFIIB. We further show that these TFIIB mutants have normal affinity for RNAPII and do not alter the promoter melting/scanning step. Finally, we show that overexpressing the genetically isolated TFIIB mutant E62K, which has a reduced affinity for RNAPII, can correct its start site selection defect. We discuss a model in which the TFIIB-RNAPII interaction controls the start site selection process by influencing the conformation of PIC prior to or during PIC assembly, as opposed to PIC stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Yi Zhang
- Division of Developmental Biology, Children's Hospital Research Foundation, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Several papers published within the last year utilize innovative techniques for characterizing intermediates in RNA polymerase II transcription. Structural studies of polymerase and its associated factors provide a detailed picture of the transcription machinery, and studies of transcription complex assembly both in vitro and in vivo provide insights into the mechanism of gene expression. A high resolution picture of the transcription complex is likely to be available within the foreseeable future. The challenge is to determine the roles of individual proteins within this surprisingly large molecular machine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Buratowski
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang DY, Dorsey MJ, Voth WP, Carson DJ, Zeng X, Stillman DJ, Ma J. Intramolecular interaction of yeast TFIIB in transcription control. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:1913-20. [PMID: 10756191 PMCID: PMC103289 DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.9.1913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The general transcription factor TFIIB is a key component in the eukaryotic RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcriptional machinery. We have previously shown that a yeast TFIIB mutant (called YR1m4) with four amino acid residues in a species-specific region changed to corresponding human residues affects the expression of genes activated by different activators in vivo. We report here that YR1m4 can interact with several affected activators in vitro. In addition, YR1m4 and other mutants with amino acid alterations within the same region can interact with TATA-binding protein (TBP) and RNAPII normally. However, YR1m4 is defective in supporting activator-independent transcription in assays con-ducted both in vitro and in vivo. We further demonstrate that the interaction between the C-terminal core domain and the N-terminal region is weakened in YR1m4 and other related TFIIB mutants. These results suggest that the intramolecular interaction property of yeast TFIIB plays an important role in transcription regulation in cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Y Zhang
- Division of Developmental Biology, Children's Hospital Research Foundation, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hawkes NA, Evans R, Roberts SG. The conformation of the transcription factor TFIIB modulates the response to transcriptional activators in vivo. Curr Biol 2000; 10:273-6. [PMID: 10712906 DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00363-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
The general transcription factor TFIIB plays a crucial role in the assembly of the transcriptional preinitiation complex and has also been proposed as a target of transcriptional activator proteins (reviewed in [1]). TFIIB is composed of two domains which are engaged in an intramolecular interaction that is disrupted upon interaction with the activation domain of the Herpesvirus VP16 protein in vitro [2] [3]. The significance of this event for transcriptional activation is not known, however. The amino-terminal intramolecular interaction domain is the most conserved region of TFIIB and plays a role in transcription start-site selection [4] [5] [6]. In addition, we have shown previously that the integrity of this region is required for transcriptional activation in vivo [4]. Here, we have defined a charge cluster at the amino terminus of TFIIB that is required for transcriptional activation in vivo. We found that this domain determines the affinity of the TFIIB intramolecular interaction and the ability of TFIIB to interact with a transcriptional activation domain, but not with components of the holoenzyme. Our results suggest that the intramolecular interaction in TFIIB regulates transcriptional activation in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Hawkes
- Division of Gene Expression, Department of Biochemistry, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Current awareness on yeast. Yeast 2000. [DOI: 10.1002/1097-0061(20000115)16:1<89::aid-yea563>3.0.co;2-h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|