GAGA factor-dependent transcription and establishment of DNase hypersensitivity are independent and unrelated events in vivo

A comparative genomic analysis of targets of Hox protein Ultrabithorax amongst distant insect species

In the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster, the differential development of wing and haltere is dependent on the function of the Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx). Here we compare Ubx-mediated regulation of wing patterning genes between the honeybee, Apis mellifera, the silkmoth, Bombyx mori and Drosophila. Orthologues of Ubx are expressed in the third thoracic segment of Apis and Bombyx, although they make functional hindwings. When over-expressed in transgenic Drosophila, Ubx derived from Apis or Bombyx could suppress wing development, suggesting evolutionary changes at the level of co-factors and/or targets of Ubx. To gain further insights into such events, we identified direct targets of Ubx from Apis and Bombyx by ChIP-seq and compared them with those of Drosophila. While majority of the putative targets of Ubx are species-specific, a considerable number of wing-patterning genes are retained, over the past 300 millions years, as targets in all the three species. Interestingly, many of these are differentially expressed only between wing and haltere in Drosophila but not between forewing and hindwing in Apis or Bombyx. Detailed bioinformatics and experimental validation of enhancer sequences suggest that, perhaps along with other factors, changes in the cis-regulatory sequences of earlier targets contribute to diversity in Ubx function.

Functional Characterization of SDF-1 Proximal Promoter

Stromal-cell derived factor 1 (SDF1) is a CXC chemokine that binds and signals through the CXCR4 receptor, playing an essential role in embryonic B lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis and organogenesis. The CXCR4/SDF1 pathway is associated with several pathologies. CXCR4 serves as a fusion cofactor for lymphotropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and SDF1 inhibits viral entry. Moreover, recent works suggest an important role for SDF1 in metastasis progression and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. To understand the molecular mechanisms that regulate SDF1 expression, we have cloned and functionally analysed its 5' flanking regulatory region. An SDF1-promoter luciferase construct showed high levels of reporter gene activity in transient transfection experiments. DNase I footprinting analysis revealed that the proximal promoter was occupied by six putative Sp1-binding motifs. Binding of Sp1 to the promoter was confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and its importance in SDF1 gene expression verified by in vitro mutagenesis. Particularly, mutation of an Sp1 motif located between -57 and -39 upstream of the main transcription start-site resulted in a marked reduction in promoter activity. It has been shown that the SDF1 expression could be induced by mitogenic stimuli, X-ray radiation or treatment with IL1beta, depending on cell environment. We have analysed the effect of these stimuli on SDF1 promoter transactivation in three different cell lines. Phorbol myristated acetate plus ionomycin increased promoter activity in U373 and LC5 but repressed it in MS5 cells. On the contrary, gamma irradiation promoted SDF1 transcription in MS5 cells but not in the other cell lines. Interferon-gamma acted as a transcriptional repressor in U373 and LC5 but not in MS5 cells. Finally, IL1beta functions as mild activator only in U373 cells. The present study demonstrates that these stimuli mediate SDF1 production through promoter activation in a cell-specific manner.

Expression of the Drosophila melanogaster ATP synthase alpha subunit gene is regulated by a transcriptional element containing GAF and Adf-1 binding sites

Mitochondrial biogenesis is a complex and highly regulated process that requires the controlled expression of hundreds of genes encoded in two separated genomes, namely the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. To identify regulatory proteins involved in the transcriptional control of key nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, we have performed a detailed analysis of the promoter region of the alpha subunit of the Drosophila melanogaster F1F0 ATP synthase complex. Using transient transfection assays, we have identified a 56 bp cis-acting proximal regulatory region that contains binding sites for the GAGA factor and the alcohol dehydrogenase distal factor 1. In vitro mutagenesis revealed that both sites are functional, and phylogenetic footprinting showed that they are conserved in other Drosophila species and in Anopheles gambiae. The 56 bp region has regulatory enhancer properties and strongly activates heterologous promoters in an orientation-independent manner. In addition, Northern blot and RT-PCR analysis identified two alpha-F1-ATPase mRNAs that differ in the length of the 3' untranslated region due to the selection of alternative polyadenylation sites.

Path to equality strewn with roX

Male flies hypertranscribe most genes along their single X chromosome to match the output of females with two X chromosomes. This is mediated by chromatin modifications carried out by the MSL complex composed of noncoding roX RNA and at least five MSL proteins. New results indicate that one of these subunits, the MOF acetyltransferase, not only acts on histone H4, but on itself and MSL3. Cycles of covalent modifications of the MSL subunits may determine the proper level of hypertranscription or control cis spreading along the chromosome. The MSL complex binds to the roX genes, the very source of the RNA component of the complex. New details of how this interaction occurs hint at a possible autoregulatory function. Finally, despite intensive efforts, the molecular mechanism by which the MSL complex distinguishes the X from the autosomes remains a mystery. The MSL complex is able to spread epigenetically from the site of roX transcription, and recent work has defined the conditions that control local cis spreading. However, it is equally clear that soluble MSL complex can distinguish the X chromosome from autosomes. Reconciling all these findings into a unified model presents a challenge.

Function of the Trithorax-like gene during Drosophila development

Maintenance of homeotic gene expression during Drosophila development relies on the Polycomb and the trithorax groups of genes. Classically, the Polycomb proteins act as repressors of homeotic gene function, whereas trithorax proteins function as activators. However, recent investigation has indicated that some of these maintenance genes may act both as repressors and activators. One of those is the Drosophila Trithorax-like gene that codes for the GAGA factor. To investigate its dual activator/repressor role, we have studied the function of the Trithorax-like throughout Drosophila development. Embryos lacking both the maternal and the zygotic Trithorax-like function do not develop suggesting that Trithorax-like might be required in oogenesis. Homozygous Trithorax-like null mutant embryos show reduced expression levels of some of the homeotic proteins. Trithorax-like mutant larval clones, however, do not show phenotypes indicative of either activation or repression of homeotic gene function. These results suggest that Trithorax-like is required during embryogenesis but not throughout larval development for the regulation of homeotic gene expression. Moreover, this temporal requirement seems also to regulate MCP-mediated silencing. Finally, lack of Trithorax-like function modulates the gain of function phenotypes caused by over-expression of homeotic genes. To explain Trithorax-like gene function, we propose a model where very early in development, GAGA factor probably establishes a chromatin ground state for transcription. The differential "on/off" transcriptional state of the homeotic genes is then established and propagated by the action of the specific regulatory proteins independently of the GAGA factor. We also suggest that GAGA factor may not have a dual activator/repressor function. Rather, Trithorax-like mutations may produce dual loss of activation and loss of repression effects.

Phosphorylation of histone H3: a balancing act between chromosome condensation and transcriptional activation

In recent years, the covalent modification of histone tails has emerged as a crucial step in controlling the transcription of eukaryotic genes. Phosphorylation of the serine 10 residue of the N-terminal tail of histone H3 is crucial for chromosome condensation and cell-cycle progression during mitosis and meiosis. In addition, this modification is important during interphase because it enables the transcription of an increasing number of genes that are activated as a consequence of a variety of cell-signaling events. The location of the serine 10 residue in close proximity to other modifiable amino acids in the histone H3 tail enables the possibility of an interaction between phosphorylation of serine 10 and methylation and/or acetylation of lysine 9 and lysine 14. Finally, the finding that the histone H3.3 variant, which has a conserved N-terminal tail, can replace histone H3 at sites of active transcription, adds a new layer of complexity and possibilities to the regulation of transcription through changes in chromatin structure.

GAGA factor down-regulates its own promoter

GAGA factor is involved in many nuclear transactions, notably in transcription as an activator in Drosophila. The genomic region corresponding to the Trl promoter has been obtained, and a minimal version of a fully active Trl promoter has been defined using transient transfection assays in S2 cells. DNase I footprinting analysis has shown that this region contains multiple GAGA binding sites, suggesting a potential regulatory role of GAGA on its own promoter. The study shows that GAGA down-regulates Trl expression. The repression does not depend on the GAGA isoform, but binding to DNA is absolutely required. A fragment of the Trl promoter can mediate repression to a heterologous promoter only upon GAGA overexpression in transiently transfected S2 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of S2 cells confirmed that GAGA factors are bound to the Trl promoter over a region of 1.4 kbp. Using a double-stranded RNA interference approach, we show that endogenous GAGA factors limit Trl expression in S2 cells. Our results open the possibility of observing similar GAGA repressive effects on other promoters.

GAGA factor and the TFIID complex collaborate in generating an open chromatin structure at the Drosophila melanogaster hsp26 promoter

The upstream regulatory region of the Drosophila melanogaster hsp26 gene includes two DNase I-hypersensitive sites (DH sites) that encompass the critical heat shock elements. This chromatin structure is required for heat shock-inducible expression and depends on two (CT)n*(GA)n elements bound by GAGA factor. To determine whether GAGA factor alone is sufficient to drive formation of the DH sites, we have created flies with an hsp26/lacZ transgene wherein the entire DNA segment known to interact with the TFIID complex has been replaced by a random sequence. The replacement results in a loss of heat shock-inducible hsp26 expression and drastically diminishes nuclease accessibility in the chromatin of the regulatory region. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that the decrease in TFIID binding does not reduce GAGA factor binding. In contrast, the loss of GAGA factor binding resulting from (CT)n mutations decreases TFIID binding. These data suggest that both GAGA factor and TFIID are necessary for formation of the appropriate chromatin structure at the hsp26 promoter and predict a regulatory mechanism in which GAGA factor binding precedes and contributes to the recruitment of TFIID.

Chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation: the cast (in order of appearance)

The number of chromatin modifying and remodeling complexes implicated in genome control is growing faster than our understanding of the functional roles they play. We discuss recent in vitro experiments with biochemically defined chromatin templates that illuminate new aspects of action by histone acetyltransferases and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling engines in facilitating transcription. We review a number of studies that present an 'ordered recruitment' view of transcriptional activation, according to which various complexes enter and exit their target promoter in a set sequence, and at specific times, such that action by one complex sets the stage for the arrival of the next one. A consensus emerging from all these experiments is that the joint action by several types of chromatin remodeling machines can lead to a more profound alteration of the infrastructure of chromatin over a target promoter than could be obtained by these enzymes acting independently. In addition, it appears that in specific cases one type of chromatin structure alteration (e.g., histone hyperacetylation) is contingent upon prior alterations of a different sort (i.e., ATP-dependent remodeling of histone-DNA contacts). The striking differences between the precise sequence of action by various cofactors observed in these studies may be - at least in part - due to differences between the specific promoters studied, and distinct requirements exhibited by specific loci for chromatin remodeling based on their pre-existing nucleoprotein architecture.

Functional mapping of the GAGA factor assigns its transcriptional activity to the C-terminal glutamine-rich domain

GAGA is a nuclear protein encoded by the Trithorax-like gene in Drosophila that is expressed in at least two isoforms generated by alternative splicing. By means of its specific interaction with DNA, GAGA has been involved in several nuclear transactions including regulation of gene expression. Here we have studied the GAGA(519) isoform as a transcription factor. In vitro, the transactivation domain has been assigned to the 93 C-terminal residues that correspond to a glutamine-rich domain (Q-domain). It presents an internal modular structure and acts independently of the rest of the protein. In vivo, in Drosophila SL2 cells, Q-domain can transactivate reporter genes either in the form of GAGA or Gal4BD-Q fusions, whereas a GAGA mutant deleted of the Q-domain cannot. Our results give support to the notion that GAGA can function as a transcription activating factor.