In vitro interaction of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein with the lactose repressor

Specificity and affinity of Lac repressor for the auxiliary operators O2 and O3 are explained by the structures of their protein-DNA complexes

The structures of a dimeric mutant of the Lac repressor DNA-binding domain complexed with the auxiliary operators O2 and O3 have been determined using NMR spectroscopy and compared to the structures of the previously determined Lac-O1 and Lac-nonoperator complexes. Structural analysis of the Lac-O1 and Lac-O2 complexes shows highly similar structures with very similar numbers of specific and nonspecific contacts, in agreement with similar affinities for these two operators. The left monomer of the Lac repressor in the Lac-O3 complex retains most of these specific contacts. However, in the right half-site of the O3 operator, there is a significant loss of protein-DNA contacts, explaining the low affinity of the Lac repressor for the O3 operator. The binding mode in the right half-site resembles that of the nonspecific complex. In contrast to the Lac-nonoperator DNA complex where no hinge helices are formed, the stability of the hinge helices in the weak Lac-O3 complex is the same as in the Lac-O1 and Lac-O2 complexes, as judged from the results of hydrogen/deuterium experiments.

Chemical linkage at allosteric activation of E. coli cAMP receptor protein

Cyclic AMP Receptor protein (CRP) regulates transcription initiation in E. coli. The ligand and DNA binding data yields the following results: (1) There are two different types of cAMP binding sites; weak and strong. (2) CRP-DNA-cAMP is the active form of all CRP conformers and this complex prefers to form from CRP-DNA rather than CRP-cAMP form. (3) Binding of additional cAMP(s) to CRP-DNA-cAMP complex greatly reduces DNA binding affinity. (4) Variants showed that ribose moiety of cAMP is important to transmit the signal to the DNA binding domain to activate specific DNA binding. (5) Deconvolution of DNA binding data leads us to propose a model for cAMP's role in transcription initiation process.

Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli

The goal of systems biology is to understand the behavior of the whole in terms of knowledge of the parts. This is hard to achieve in many cases due to the difficulty of characterizing the many constituents involved in a biological system and their complex web of interactions. The lac promoter of Escherichia coli offers the possibility of confronting "system-level" properties of transcriptional regulation with the known biochemistry of the molecular constituents and their mutual interactions. Such confrontations can reveal previously unknown constituents and interactions, as well as offer insight into how the components work together as a whole. Here we study the combinatorial control of the lac promoter by the regulators Lac repressor (LacR) and cAMP-receptor protein (CRP). A previous in vivo study [Setty Y, Mayo AE, Surette MG, Alon U (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7702-7707] found gross disagreement between the observed promoter activities and the expected behavior based on the known molecular mechanisms. We repeated the study by identifying and removing several extraneous factors that significantly modulated the expression of the lac promoter. Through quantitative, systematic characterization of promoter activity for a number of key mutants and guided by the thermodynamic model of transcriptional regulation, we were able to account for the combinatorial control of the lac promoter quantitatively, in terms of a cooperative interaction between CRP and LacR-mediated DNA looping. Specifically, our analysis indicates that the sensitivity of the inducer response results from LacR-mediated DNA looping, which is significantly enhanced by CRP.

Analysis of in-vivo LacR-mediated gene repression based on the mechanics of DNA looping

Interactions of E. coli lac repressor (LacR) with a pair of operator sites on the same DNA molecule can lead to the formation of looped nucleoprotein complexes both in vitro and in vivo. As a major paradigm for loop-mediated gene regulation, parameters such as operator affinity and spacing, repressor concentration, and DNA bending induced by specific or non-specific DNA-binding proteins (e.g., HU), have been examined extensively. However, a complete and rigorous model that integrates all of these aspects in a systematic and quantitative treatment of experimental data has not been available. Applying our recent statistical-mechanical theory for DNA looping, we calculated repression as a function of operator spacing (58-156 bp) from first principles and obtained excellent agreement with independent sets of in-vivo data. The results suggest that a linear extended, as opposed to a closed v-shaped, LacR conformation is the dominant form of the tetramer in vivo. Moreover, loop-mediated repression in wild-type E. coli strains is facilitated by decreased DNA rigidity and high levels of flexibility in the LacR tetramer. In contrast, repression data for strains lacking HU gave a near-normal value of the DNA persistence length. These findings underscore the importance of both protein conformation and elasticity in the formation of small DNA loops widely observed in vivo, and demonstrate the utility of quantitatively analyzing gene regulation based on the mechanics of nucleoprotein complexes.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer over approximately 130 basepairs in hyperstable lac repressor-DNA loops

Lac repressor (LacI) binds two operator DNA sites, looping the intervening DNA. DNA molecules containing two lac operators bracketing a sequence-directed bend were previously shown to form hyperstable LacI-looped complexes. Biochemical studies suggested that orienting the operators outward relative to the bend direction (in construct 9C14) stabilizes a positively supercoiled closed form, with a V-shaped LacI, but that the most stable loop construct (11C12) is a more open form. Here, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is measured on DNA loops, between fluorescein and TAMRA attached near the two operators, approximately 130 basepairs apart. For 9C14, efficient LacI-induced energy transfer ( approximately 74% based on donor quenching) confirms that the designed DNA shape can force the looped complex into a closed form. From enhanced acceptor emission, correcting for observed donor-dependent quenching of acceptor fluorescence, approximately 52% transfer was observed. Time-resolved FRET suggests that this complex exists in both closed- and open form populations. Less efficient transfer, approximately 10%, was detected for DNA-LacI sandwiches and 11C12-LacI, consistent with an open form loop. This demonstration of long-range FRET in large DNA loops confirms that appropriate DNA design can control loop geometry. LacI flexibility may allow it to maintain looping with other proteins bound or under different intracellular conditions.

Role of hydration in the binding of lac repressor to DNA

The osmotic stress technique was used to measure changes in macromolecular hydration that accompany binding of wild-type Escherichia coli lactose (lac) repressor to its regulatory site (operator O1) in the lac promoter and its transfer from site O1 to nonspecific DNA. Binding at O1 is accompanied by the net release of 260 +/- 32 water molecules. If all are released from macromolecular surfaces, this result is consistent with a net reduction of solvent-accessible surface area of 2370 +/- 550 A. This area is only slightly smaller than the macromolecular interface calculated for a crystalline repressor dimer-O1 complex but is significantly smaller than that for the corresponding complex with the symmetrical optimized O(sym) operator. The transfer of repressor from site O1 to nonspecific DNA is accompanied by the net uptake of 93 +/- 10 water molecules. Together these results imply that formation of a nonspecific complex is accompanied by the net release of 165 +/- 43 water molecules. The enhanced stabilities of repressor-DNA complexes with increasing osmolality may contribute to the ability of Escherichia coli cells to tolerate dehydration and/or high external salt concentrations.

The Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein forms a 2:2 complex with RNA polymerase holoenzyme, in vitro

Sedimentation equilibrium studies show that the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CAP) and RNA polymerase holoenzyme associate to form a 2:2 complex in vitro. No complexes of lower stoichiometry (1:1, 2:1, 1:2) were detected over a wide range of CAP and RNA polymerase concentrations, suggesting that the interaction is highly cooperative. The absence of higher stoichiometry complexes, even in the limit of high [protein], suggests that the 2:2 species represents binding saturation for this system. The 2:2 pattern of complex formation is robust. A lower-limit estimate of the formation constant in our standard buffer (40 mm Tris (pH 7.9), 10 mm MgCl(2), 0.1 mm dithiothreitol, 5% glycerol, 100 mm KCl) is 2 x 10(20) m(-3). The qualitative pattern of association is unchanged over the temperature range 4 degrees C < or = T < or = 20 degrees C, by substitution of glutamate for chloride as the dominant anion, or on addition of 20 microm cAMP to the reaction mix. These results limit the possible mechanisms of CAP-polymerase association. In addition, they support the idea that CAP binding may influence the availability of the monomeric form of RNA polymerase that mediates transcription at many promoters.

Stoichiometry and structural effect of the cyclic nucleotide binding to cyclic AMP receptor protein

Cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) is a homodimeric protein, which is activated by cAMP binding to function as a transcriptional regulator of many genes in prokaryotes. Until now, the actual number of cAMP molecules that can be bound by CRP in solution has been ambiguous. In this work, we performed a nuclear magnetic resonance study on CRP to investigate the stoichiometry of cyclic nucleotide binding to CRP. A series of (1)H-(15)N heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectra of the protein in the absence and in the presence of cAMP or cGMP were analyzed. The addition of cAMP to CRP induced a biphasic spectral change up to 4 equivalents, whereas the cGMP addition made a monophasic change up to 2 equivalents. Altogether, the results not only established for the first time that CRP possesses two cyclic AMP-binding sites in each monomer, even in a solution without DNA, but also suggest that the syn-cAMP binding sites of the CRP dimer can be formed by an allosteric conformational change of the protein upon the binding of two anti-cAMPs at the N-terminal domain. In addition, a residue-specific inspection of the spectral changes provides some new structural information about the cAMP-induced allosteric activation of CRP.