Two classes of androgen receptor elements mediate cooperativity through allosteric interactions

Sex steroids as mediators of phenotypic integration, genetic correlations, and evolutionary transitions

In recent decades, endocrinologists have increasingly adopted evolutionary methods and perspectives to characterize the evolution of the vertebrate endocrine system and leverage it as a model for developing and testing evolutionary theories. This review summarizes recent research on sex steroids (androgens and estrogens) to illustrate three ways in which a detailed understanding of the molecular and cellular architecture of hormonally mediated gene expression can enhance our understanding of general evolutionary principles. By virtue of their massively pleiotropic effects on the expression of genes and phenotypes, sex steroids and their receptors can (1) structure the patterns of phenotypic variance and covariance that are available to natural selection, (2) alter the underlying genetic correlations that determine a population's evolutionary response to selection, and (3) facilitate evolutionary transitions in fitness-related phenotypes via subtle regulatory shifts in underlying tissues and genes. These principles are illustrated by the author's research on testosterone and sexual dimorphism in lizards, and by recent examples drawn from other vertebrate systems. Mechanistically, these examples call attention to the importance of evolutionary changes in (1) androgen- and estrogen-mediated gene expression, (2) androgen and estrogen receptor expression, and (3) the distribution of androgen and estrogen response elements in target genes throughout the genome. A central theme to emerge from this review is that the rapidly increasing availability of genomic and transcriptomic data from non-model organisms places evolutionary endocrinologist in an excellent position to address the hormonal regulation of the key evolutionary interface between genes and phenotypes.

Androgen receptor co-regulation in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) progression relies on androgen receptor (AR) action. Preventing AR's ligand-activation is the frontline treatment for metastatic PCa. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) that inhibits AR ligand-binding initially induces remission but eventually fails, mainly because of adaptive PCa responses that restore AR action. The vast majority of castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) continues to rely on AR activity. Novel therapeutic strategies are being explored that involve targeting other critical AR domains such as those that mediate its constitutively active transactivation function, its DNA binding ability, or its interaction with co-operating transcriptional regulators. Considerable molecular and clinical variability has been found in AR's interaction with its ligands, DNA binding motifs, and its associated coregulators and transcription factors. Here, we review evidence that each of these levels of AR regulation can individually and differentially impact transcription by AR. In addition, we examine emerging insights suggesting that each can also impact the other, and that all three may collaborate to induce gene-specific AR target gene expression, likely via AR allosteric effects. For the purpose of this review, we refer to the modulating influence of these differential and/or interdependent contributions of ligands, cognate DNA-binding motifs and critical regulatory protein interactions on AR's transcriptional output, which may influence the efficiency of the novel PCa therapeutic approaches under consideration, as co-regulation of AR activity.

Christmas disease in a Hovawart family resembling human hemophilia B Leyden is caused by a single nucleotide deletion in a highly conserved transcription factor binding site of the F9 gene promoter

Hemophilia B is a classical monogenic, X-chromosomal, recessively transmitted bleeding disorder caused by genetic variants within the coagulation factor IX gene (F9). Although hemophilia B has been described in dogs, it has not yet been reported in the Hovawart breed. Here we describe the identification of a Hovawart family transmitting typical signs of an X-linked bleeding disorder. Five males were reported to suffer from recurrent hemorrhagic episodes. A blood sample from one of these males with only 2% of the normal concentration of plasma factor IX together with samples from seven relatives were provided. Next-generation sequencing of the mother and grandmother revealed a single nucleotide deletion in the F9 promoter. Genotyping of the deletion in 1,298 dog specimens including 720 Hovawarts revealed that the mutant allele was only present in the aforementioned Hovawart family. The deletion is located 73 bp upstream of the F9 start codon in the conserved overlapping DNA binding sites of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF-4α) and androgen receptor (AR). The deletion only abolished binding of HNF-4α, while AR binding was unaffected as demonstrated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay using human HNF-4α and AR with double-stranded DNA probes encompassing the mutant promoter region. Luciferase reporter assays using wildtype and mutated promoter fragment constructs transfected into Hep G2 cells showed a significant reduction in expression from the mutant promoter. The data provide evidence that the deletion in the Hovawart family caused a rare type of hemophilia B resembling human hemophilia B Leyden.

Rationale for the development of alternative forms of androgen deprivation therapy

With few exceptions, the almost 30,000 prostate cancer deaths annually in the United States are due to failure of androgen deprivation therapy. Androgen deprivation therapy prevents ligand-activation of the androgen receptor. Despite initial remission after androgen deprivation therapy, prostate cancer almost invariably progresses while continuing to rely on androgen receptor action. Androgen receptor's transcriptional output, which ultimately controls prostate cancer behavior, is an alternative therapeutic target, but its molecular regulation is poorly understood. Recent insights in the molecular mechanisms by which the androgen receptor controls transcription of its target genes are uncovering gene specificity as well as context-dependency. Heterogeneity in the androgen receptor's transcriptional output is reflected both in its recruitment to diverse cognate DNA binding motifs and in its preferential interaction with associated pioneering factors, other secondary transcription factors and coregulators at those sites. This variability suggests that multiple, distinct modes of androgen receptor action that regulate diverse aspects of prostate cancer biology and contribute differentially to prostate cancer's clinical progression are active simultaneously in prostate cancer cells. Recent progress in the development of peptidomimetics and small molecules, and application of Chem-Seq approaches indicate the feasibility for selective disruption of critical protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions in transcriptional complexes. Here, we review the recent literature on the different molecular mechanisms by which the androgen receptor transcriptionally controls prostate cancer progression, and we explore the potential to translate these insights into novel, more selective forms of therapies that may bypass prostate cancer's resistance to conventional androgen deprivation therapy.

The importance of non-nuclear AR signaling in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic resistance

The androgen receptor (AR) remains the major oncogenic driver of prostate cancer, as evidenced by the efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in naïve patients, and the continued effectiveness of second generation ADTs in castration resistant disease. However, current ADTs are limited to interfering with AR ligand binding, either through suppression of androgen production or the use of competitive antagonists. Recent studies demonstrate 1) the expression of constitutively active AR splice variants that no longer depend on androgen, and 2) the ability of AR to signal in the cytoplasm independently of its transcriptional activity (non-genomic); thus highlighting the need to consider other ways to target AR. Herein, we review canonical AR signaling, but focus on AR non-genomic signaling, some of its downstream targets and how these effectors contribute to prostate cancer cell behavior. The goals of this review are to 1) re-highlight the continued importance of AR in prostate cancer as the primary driver, 2) discuss the limitations in continuing to use ligand binding as the sole targeting mechanism, 3) discuss the implications of AR non-genomic signaling in cancer progression and therapeutic resistance, and 4) address the need to consider non-genomic AR signaling mechanisms and pathways as a viable targeting strategy in combination with current therapies.

A molecular analysis provides novel insights into androgen receptor signalling in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Androgen Receptor (AR) is an essential transcription factor for the development of secondary sex characteristics, spermatogenesis and carcinogenesis. Recently AR has been implicated in the development and progression of breast and prostate cancers. Although some of the functions of the AR are known but the mechanistic details of these divergent processes are still not clear. Therefore understanding the regulatory mechanisms of the functioning of the AR in ER-/AR+ breast cancer will provide many novel targets for the purpose of therapeutic intervention.

METHODS/RESULTS

Using bioinformatics tools, we have identified 75 AR targets having prominent roles in cell cycle, apoptosis and metabolism. Herein, we validated 10 genes as AR targets by studying the regulation of these genes in MDA-MB-453 cell line on stimulation by androgens like 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), using RT-qPCR and ChIP assay. It was observed that all the identified genes involved in cell cycle except MAD1L1 were found to be up regulated whereas expression of apoptosis related genes was decreased in response to DHT treatment. We performed an exhaustive, rigid-body docking between individual ARE and DNA binding domain (DBD) of the AR protein and it was found that novel residues K567, K588, K591 and R592 are involved in the process of DNA binding. To verify these specific DNA-protein interactions electrostatic energy term calculations for each residue was determined using the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Our experimental data showed that treatment of breast cancer cells with DHT promotes cell proliferation and decreases apoptosis. It was observed that bicalutamide treatment was able to reverse the effect of DHT.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results provide new insights into the mechanism by which AR promotes breast cancer progression. Moreover our work proposes to use bicalutamide along with taxanes as novel therapy for the treatment of TNBCs, which are positive for downstream AR signalling.

Principles of allosteric interactions in cell signaling

Linking cell signaling events to the fundamental physicochemical basis of the conformational behavior of single molecules and ultimately to cellular function is a key challenge facing the life sciences. Here we outline the emerging principles of allosteric interactions in cell signaling, with emphasis on the following points. (1) Allosteric efficacy is not a function of the chemical composition of the allosteric pocket but reflects the extent of the population shift between the inactive and active states. That is, the allosteric effect is determined by the extent of preferred binding, not by the overall binding affinity. (2) Coupling between the allosteric and active sites does not decide the allosteric effect; however, it does define the propagation pathways, the allosteric binding sites, and key on-path residues. (3) Atoms of allosteric effectors can act as "driver" or "anchor" and create attractive "pulling" or repulsive "pushing" interactions. Deciphering, quantifying, and integrating the multiple co-occurring events present daunting challenges to our scientific community.

A view through a chromatin loop: insights into the ecdysone activation of early genes in Drosophila

The early genes are a key group of ecdysone targets that function at the top of the signaling hierarchy. In the presence of ecdysone, early genes exhibit a highly characteristic rapid and powerful induction that represents a primary response. Multiple isoforms encoded by early genes then coordinate the activation of a larger group of late genes. While the general mechanism of ecdysone-dependent transcription is well characterized, it is not known whether a distinct mechanism governs the hormonal response of early genes. We previously found that one of the Drosophila early genes, E75, harbors multiple functional ecdysone response elements (EcREs). In this study we extended the analysis to Broad and E74 and found that EcRE multiplicity is a general feature of the early genes. Since most of the EcREs within early gene loci are situated distantly from promoters, we employed the chromosome conformation capture method to determine whether higher order chromatin structure facilitates hormonal activation. For each early gene we detected chromatin loops that juxtapose their promoters and multiple distant EcREs prior to ecdysone activation. Our findings suggest that higher order chromatin structure may serve as an important mechanism underlying the distinct response of early genes to ecdysone.

Mechanisms of transcription factor selectivity

The initiation of transcription is regulated by transcription factors (TFs) binding to DNA response elements (REs). How do TFs recognize specific binding sites among the many similar ones available in the genome? Recent research has illustrated that even a single nucleotide substitution can alter the selective binding of TFs to coregulators, that prior binding events can lead to selective DNA binding, and that selectivity is influenced by the availability of binding sites in the genome. Here, we combine structural insights with recent genomics screens to address the problem of TF-DNA interaction specificity. The emerging picture of selective binding site sequence recognition and TF activation involves three major factors: the cellular network, protein and DNA as dynamic conformational ensembles and the tight packing of multiple TFs and coregulators on stretches of regulatory DNA. The classification of TF recognition mechanisms based on these factors impacts our understanding of how transcription initiation is regulated.

Hormonal regulation of the E75 gene in Drosophila: identifying functional regulatory elements through computational and biological analysis

Drosophila development is regulated by two hormones, 20-hydroxyecdysone (ecdysone) and juvenile hormone. We previously found that expression of the E75 gene is induced by both hormones in cultured S2 cells. E75 occupies over 100 kb of genomic DNA; it has four alternative promoters producing isoforms E75A, E75B, E75C, and E75D. To identify hormone response elements in the 60-kb noncoding area upstream of the E75A transcription start site, we developed a novel approach combining in vitro, in vivo, and in silico techniques. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with quantitative real-time PCR, we identified five putative enhancers marked with H3K4 monomethylation and depletion of H3. Four of these are ecdysone-regulated enhancers, which possess hormone-responsive chromatin and contain sequences sufficient to confer ecdysone inducibility to a reporter gene. Using EvoPrinterHD- and Multiple Expectation Maximization for Motif Elicitation-based computational analysis, we first created a database of short sequences that are highly conserved among 12 Drosophila species. Within this database, we then identified a set of putative ecdysone response elements (EcREs). Seven of these elements represent in vivo binding sites for the ecdysone receptor and are necessary for hormone-mediated activation of gene expression in cultured cells. We found that each EcRE exhibits different binding and activation properties, and at least some of them function cooperatively.We propose that the presence of multiple EcREs with distinct features provides flexibility to the rapid and powerful response of E75A to ecdysone during Drosophila development.

Transcriptional regulation of the TGF-beta1 promoter by androgen receptor

TGF (transforming growth factor)-beta1 is a multifunctional cytokine that influences homoeostatic processes of various tissues. TGF-beta1 expression is inhibited by androgens in the prostate gland, whereas its expression is enhanced by androgens in highly metastatic prostate cancer cells. Here, we examined regulation of human TGF-beta1 promoter activity by androgen in prostate cancer cells. The full-length (-3363 to +110) promoter showed a high level of activity in response to androgen in PC3mm2 cells expressing AR (androgen receptor). Further deletion analysis revealed three distal and three proximal AREs (androgen-response elements) in the promoter. Gel-shift and footprint assays show that these AREs physically interact with the DNA-binding domain of AR. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed the androgen-dependent recruitment of AR to the ARE-containing regions of the TGF-beta1 gene. More importantly, a negative ARE was detected in the TGF-beta1 promoter. Both positive and negative AREs are functional in the androgen-regulated transcription of the TGF-beta1 promoter. These findings imply that androgen signalling may positively or negatively regulate TGF-beta1 expression in response to various signals or under different environmental conditions.

Receptor-DNA interactions: EMSA and footprinting

Defining the precise promoter DNA sequence motifs where nuclear receptors and other transcription factors bind is an essential prerequisite for understanding how these proteins modulate the expression of their specific target genes. The purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader with a detailed guide with respect to the materials and the key methods required to perform this type of DNA-binding analysis. Irrespective of whether starting with purified DNA-binding proteins or somewhat crude cellular extracts, the tried-and-true procedures described here will enable one to accurately access the capacity of specific proteins to bind to DNA as well as to determine the exact sequences and DNA contact nucleotides involved. For illustrative purposes, we primarily have used the interaction of the androgen receptor with the rat probasin proximal promoter as our model system.

Sex-related differences in gene expression in human skeletal muscle

There is sexual dimorphism of skeletal muscle, the most obvious feature being the larger muscle mass of men. The molecular basis for this difference has not been clearly defined. To identify genes that might contribute to the relatively greater muscularity of men, we compared skeletal muscle gene expression profiles of 15 normal men and 15 normal women by using comprehensive oligonucleotide microarrays. Although there were sex-related differences in expression of several hundred genes, very few of the differentially expressed genes have functions that are obvious candidates for explaining the larger muscle mass of men. The men tended to have higher expression of genes encoding mitochondrial proteins, ribosomal proteins, and a few translation initiation factors. The women had >2-fold greater expression than the men (P<0.0001) of two genes that encode proteins in growth factor pathways known to be important in regulating muscle mass: growth factor receptor-bound 10 (GRB10) and activin A receptor IIB (ACVR2B). GRB10 encodes a protein that inhibits insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling. ACVR2B encodes a myostatin receptor. Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed higher expression of GRB10 and ACVR2B genes in these women. In an independent microarray study of 10 men and 9 women with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, women had higher expression of GRB10 (2.7-fold, P<0.001) and ACVR2B (1.7-fold, P<0.03). If these sex-related differences in mRNA expression lead to reduced IGF-1 activity and increased myostatin activity, they could contribute to the sex difference in muscle size.

Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: a diversity of functions converging on and regulating the AR transcriptional complex

Androgens, acting through the androgen receptor (AR), are responsible for the development of the male phenotype during embryogenesis, the achievement of sexual maturation at puberty, and the maintenance of male reproductive function and behavior in adulthood. In addition, androgens affect a wide variety of nonreproductive tissues. Moreover, aberrant androgen action plays a critical role in multiple pathologies, including prostate cancer and androgen insensitivity syndromes. The formation of a productive AR transcriptional complex requires the functional and structural interaction of the AR with its coregulators. In the last decade, an overwhelming and ever increasing number of proteins have been proposed to possess AR coactivating or corepressing characteristics. Intriguingly, a vast diversity of functions has been ascribed to these proteins, indicating that a multitude of cellular functions and signals converge on the AR to regulate its function. The current review aims to provide an overview of the AR coregulator proteins identified to date and to propose a classification of these AR coregulator proteins according to the function(s) ascribed to them. Taken together, this approach will increase our understanding of the cellular pathways that converge on the AR to ensure an appropriate transcriptional response to androgens.

Induction of the SUMO-specific protease 1 transcription by the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells

Prostate cancer, the most frequently diagnosed carcinoma in males, is readily modulated via the transcriptional activity of androgen receptors. Our recent publication reported that androgen receptor-dependent transcription is significantly elevated with expression of the human sentrin/SUMO-specific protease (SENP1) in the androgen-sensitive human prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP). In situ hybridization studies indicated an elevation of SENP1 message in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer lesions as compared with normal prostate epithelia. This study aimed to delineate the mechanism for the regulation of SENP1 message and to determine the pathophysiological consequence of SENP1 induction with respect to prostate cancer. Real-time PCR confirmed the elevation of SENP1 mRNA in prostate cancer cells as compared with normal prostate epithelial cells. Chronic androgen exposure of LNCaP cells prompted an enhancement in the SENP1 transcript selectively. This androgen-mediated augmentation of SENP1 was absent with co-administration of the androgen receptor antagonist bicalutamide and in androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer PC-3 cells, indicating an androgen receptor-dependent event. Activation of the androgen receptor was required for binding an identified androgen response element and positively regulating SENP1 promoter activity. Abrogation of elevated SENP1 mRNA in prostate cancer cells significantly decreased androgen-mediated cell growth. Because increased SENP1 expression directly modulated androgen receptor-dependent cell proliferation and transcription, SENP1 could play an important role in prostate carcinogenesis.

Identification of androgen response elements in the insulin-like growth factor I upstream promoter

Testosterone stimulates the expression of IGF-I in cells and tissues that include prostate, muscle and muscle satellite cells, and the uterus. Here, the molecular mechanisms of this effect of testosterone were explored. Testosterone increased IGF-I mRNA levels in HepG2 and LNCaP cells and stimulated the activity of reporter genes controlled by 1.6 kb of the upstream promoter of the human IGF-I gene. An androgen-responsive region that was located between -1320 and -1420 bases upstream of the first codon was identified by truncation studies. The androgen-responsive region was found to contain two sequences resembling known androgen receptor (AR)-binding sites from the Pem1 gene. Reporter genes incorporating these sequences were strongly stimulated by androgens. Each of the androgen-responsive elements (AREs) bound recombinant AR-DNA-binding domain in gel-shift experiments; binding was greatly enhanced by sequences flanking the apparent AR-binding half-sites. Testosterone induced recruitment of AR to sequences of genomic DNA containing these AREs. The two AREs were activated 5-fold more by AR than glucocorticoid receptor. Collectively, these findings indicate the presence of two AREs within the IGF-I upstream promoter that act in cis to activate IGF-I expression. These AREs seem likely to contribute to the up-regulation of the IGF-I gene in prostate tissues, HepG2 cells, and potentially other tissues.

Probasin promoter assembles into a strongly positioned nucleosome that permits androgen receptor binding

The promoter of the murine probasin (PB) gene exhibits strong androgen receptor (AR)-specific and tissue-specific regulation and is considered a promising candidate for gene therapy treatment of advanced prostate cancer. To characterize the determinants of chromatin specificity of the PB promoter with the AR we initially investigated the in vitro interactions of recombinant AR DNA binding domain (AR-DBD) with reconstituted nucleosomes incorporating the proximal PB promoter (nucleotides -268 to -76). We demonstrate that a DNA fragment of this promoter region exhibits strong nucleosome positioning. The phased DNA sequence protected by the histone octamer includes four androgen receptor response elements (AREs) which are arranged as two sets of class I and class II sites spaced approximately 90bp apart. Class I AREs form classical contacts with the AR, whereas class II AREs contain atypical binding sequences and have been shown to stabilize AR binding to adjacent class I sites, resulting in synergistic transcriptional activation and increased hormone sensitivity. We used DNase 1 footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to show that the AR-DBD binds to its cognate sequences independently of their nucleosomal organization. In addition, we show that the ability of the AR-DBD to interact with the nucleosomal PB promoter is not affected by histone acetylation. Thus the AR-DBD is able to bind to its cognate sequences within the PB promoter in a way that is indifferent to the presence or absence of histones and nucleosomal structure.

Changes in steroid receptors and proteoglycan expression in the guinea pig prostate stroma during puberty and hormone manipulation

BACKGROUND

Proteoglycans are structural and informational molecules important during embryogenesis and organ maturation. Maturation of the prostate is influenced by androgens and estrogens, but changes in the relative spatiotemporal expression of steroid receptors and proteoglycans during hormonal change are unexplored.

METHODS

Guinea pig prostate was used to define hormone-induced changes in the expression of androgen (AR) and estrogen (ER(alpha)) receptors, chondroitin sulfate (CS) glycosaminoglycan and core proteins of versican and syndecan-1. Tissue locations of AR, ER(alpha), CS and the proteoglycans versican and syndecan-1 were determined by immunohistochemistry. Cellular content of ER(alpha) and syndecan-1 was assessed visually. Versican, CS56 epitope, and AR were quantified by image analysis.

RESULTS

AR expression within prostate epithelial and stromal cell nuclei decreased following castration and increased following treatment of castrate animals with dihydrotestosterone (DHT). ER(alpha) expression was restricted to prostate stromal cell nuclei and decreased during puberty, and following treatment of castrate animals with DHT. Versican was present in periacinar stroma immediately peripheral to basal epithelial cells, fibromuscular stromal tissue bands surrounding acinar units, and loose fibrovascular connective tissue interspersed between individual acini. Versican and native CS expression decreased (>10-fold) in periacinar stroma during puberty and following administration of DHT to castrated animals. Expression of syndecan-1 was restricted to fibromuscular cells of prostate stroma, and remained constant during puberty and hormone manipulation.

CONCLUSIONS

ER(alpha), versican core protein and CS side chain epitopes are negatively regulated in prostate stromal tissue by DHT, whilst AR levels are positively regulated.

Differential regulation of clusterin and its isoforms by androgens in prostate cells

Clusterin mRNA levels were shown to increase dramatically in rat ventral prostate following castration, and clusterin was therefore originally thought to be repressed by androgens. It was later discovered that the increased clusterin levels are most likely due to castration-induced apoptosis of the prostatic epithelium rather than direct action of the androgen receptor (AR). In the studies presented here, LNCaP cells in culture and rat prostate organ culture were treated with androgens. Clusterin mRNA and protein are shown to increase with androgen treatment in a time- and dose-dependent manner. This induction of clusterin requires AR and can be inhibited by casodex, an AR antagonist. We have found that the first intron of the clusterin gene contains putative androgen response elements. The intronic region is shown to be bound by AR in chromatin immunoprecipitation assays and is transactivated by AR in reporter assays. Two isoforms of clusterin result from alternate transcriptional start sites. Both isoforms are cytoprotective; however, Isoform 1 has the capacity to produce a splice variant that is apoptotic. Real time PCR was used to determine the response of the two isoforms to androgens. Intriguingly, these results illustrated that Isoform 2 was up-regulated, whereas Isoform 1 was down-regulated by androgens. Isoform 2 was also increased as the LNCaP xenograft tumor progressed to androgen-independence, whereas Isoform 1 was unaltered. This androgen regulation of clusterin may underline the cytoprotective role of androgens in normal prostate physiology as well as play an antiapoptotic role in prostate cancer progression.

Multiple androgen response elements cooperate in androgen regulated activity of the type 1 neutral endopeptidase promoter

The neutral endopeptidase (NEP) gene is transcriptionally regulated by androgen in prostate cancer cells. We previously identified in the NEP gene an androgen responsive element (NEP-ARE) and an androgen responsive region (NEP-ARR) that together conveyed only moderate androgen-inducibility [Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 170 (2000) 131]. Therefore, we characterized the entire genomic structure of the NEP gene and identified ARE1 (ACTCAACAttgTGTCCTTT) and ARE2 (CAGGACAtttTGTCCC), which are located in the 3'-untranslated region and in intron 17, respectively. Steroid-dependent enhancement of transcription was assayed by transfecting the pGL-3-luciferase reporter plasmid containing three copies of ARE1 or ARE2 into PC-3 cells. Luciferase activities were increased 3.6-fold (ARE1) and 5-fold (ARE2) by androgen (AR), 4.2-fold (ARE1) and 8.2-fold (ARE2) by dexamethasone, and 3-fold (ARE1) and 4.1-fold (ARE2) by progesterone. Mutation of the ARE1 and ARE2 sequences completely abrogated androgen-inducibility. We next showed that both ARE1 and ARE2 are involved in the transcriptional regulation of the NEP gene, demonstrating in vitro and in vivo binding with AR as determined by electrophoretic mobility gel shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, Furthermore, ARE1 and ARE2 mediate coordinated androgen-inducibility in both an SV40 promoter and the native NEP type 1 promoter. These data indicate the newly identified ARE1 and ARE2 together with the previously identified NEP-ARE function as androgen response elements, and that androgen regulation of the NEP gene is regulated by the coordinated action of multiple AREs in prostate cancer cells.

Dual androgen-response elements mediate androgen regulation of MMP-2 expression in prostate cancer cells

AIM

To characterize the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 promoter and to identify androgen response elements (AREs) involved in androgen-induced MMP-2 expression.

METHODS

MMP-2 mRNA levels was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). MMP-2 promoter-driven luciferase assays were used to determine the fragments responsible for androgen-induced activity. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation assay and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) were used to verify the identified AREs in the MMP-2 promoter.

RESULTS

Androgen significantly induced MMP-2 expression at the mRNA level, which was blocked by the androgen antagonist bicalutamide. Deletion of a region encompassing base pairs -1591 to -1259 (relative to the start codon) of the MMP-2 promoter led to a significant loss of androgen-induced reporter activity. Additional deletion of the 5'-region up to -562 bp further reduced the androgen-induced MMP-2 promoter activity. Sequence analysis of these two regions revealed two putative ARE motifs. Introducing mutations in the putative ARE motifs by site-directed mutagenesis approach resulted in a dramatic loss of androgen-induced MMP-2 promoter activity, indicating that the putative ARE motifs are required for androgen-stimulated MMP-2 expression. Most importantly, the androgen receptor (AR) interacted with both motif-containing promoter regions in vivo in a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay after androgen treatment. Furthermore, the AR specifically bound to the wild-type but not mutated ARE motifs-containing probes in an in vitro EMSA assay.

CONCLUSION

Two ARE motifs were identified to be responsible for androgen-induced MMP-2 expression in prostate cancer cells.

The androgen receptor directly targets the cellular Fas/FasL-associated death domain protein-like inhibitory protein gene to promote the androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells

Androgens provide survival signals to prostate epithelial cells, and androgen ablation induces apoptosis in the prostate gland. However, the molecular mechanisms of actions of the androgen-signaling pathway in these processes are not fully understood. Here, we report that androgens induced expression of the cellular Fas/FasL-associated death domain protein-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) gene, which is a potent inhibitor of Fas/FasL-mediated apoptosis. The androgen receptor was recruited to the promoter of the c-FLIP gene in the presence of androgens. We found that c-FLIP promoter contained multiple functional androgen response elements. In addition, we show that c-FLIP overexpression accelerated progression to androgen independence by inhibiting apoptosis in LNCaP prostate tumors implanted in nude mice. Our results suggest that the androgen receptor affects survival and apoptosis of prostate cells through regulation of the c-FLIP gene in response to androgens.

The role of DNA response elements as allosteric modulators of steroid receptor function

Steroid receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors which control the expression of their target genes by binding to specific DNA elements. Consensus response elements have been delineated for the glucocorticoid, androgen, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors on one hand (steroid response element, SRE) and for the estrogen receptor on the other hand (estrogen response element, ERE). Small variations in these sequences not only affect the binding but may also have a dramatic impact on the transcriptional activity of steroid receptors. It has now become obvious that DNA response elements do not merely tether regulatory proteins to control regions of target genes but may additionally impart conformational changes onto the DNA-binding domain as well as to neighbouring domains of steroid receptors. This in turn will create unique platforms for selective recruitment of cofactors and possibly for induction of modifications in local chromatin architecture. An additional level of complexity is added by the frequent presence of multiple response elements in gene promoter regions. The allosteric effects of DNA response elements on steroid receptors may be essential for differential gene expression and this offers interesting perspectives for the identification of selective modulators.

Intronic hormone response elements mediate regulation of FKBP5 by progestins and glucocorticoids

Expression of FKBP51, a large molecular weight immunophilin, is strongly enhanced by glucocorticoids, progestins, and androgens. However, the activity of a 3.4-kb fragment of the FKBP51 gene (FKBP5) promoter was only weakly increased by progestin and we show here that it is unresponsive to glucocorticoids and androgens. The entire FKBP5 was scanned for consensus hormone response elements (HREs) using MatInspector. We found that 2 regions of intron E, which are conserved in rat and mouse FKBP5, contain HRE-like sequences with high match scores. Deoxyribonucleic acid fragments (approximately 1 kb in length) containing these regions were amplified and tested in reporter gene assays for steroid responsiveness. One region of intron E of FKBP5 (pIE2) conferred both glucocorticoid and progestin responsiveness to 2 heterologous reporter genes, whereas the other, less-conserved region of intron E (pIE1) was responsive only to progestins. The inclusion of pIE1 upstream of pIE2 (pIE1IE2) enhanced progestin but not glucocorticoid responsiveness. None of the constructs containing intronic sequences was responsive to androgens. Mutation of the putative HREs within pIE1 and pIE2 eliminated hormone responsiveness. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that progesterone receptors (PR) bound to the HRE in pIE1, whereas both PR and glucocorticoid receptors interacted with the HRE in pIE2. These data suggest that distal intronic elements significantly contribute to transcriptional regulation of FKBP5 by glucocorticoids and progestins.

Role of arginine residues 14 and 15 in dictating DNA binding stability and transactivation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor/aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator heterodimer

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and its DNA binding partner, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) are basic helix-loop-helix/PAS proteins. The goal of the current study was to determine the extent to which residues R14 and R15 contained within the basic region of the AHR contribute to the DNA binding affinity and stability of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer. Towards this end, we first performed equilibrium binding and dissociation rate analyses using a single dioxin response element (DRE-1). While the K(D) and Bmax values obtained from the equilibrium binding analysis were similar for the wild-type AHR (wt AHR) and that containing the substitutions of R14 and R15 with Q residues (Q14Q15 AHR), dissociation rate analyses revealed that the stability of the Q14Q15 AHR DNA binding complex was approximately 10-fold less. Using a two-site DNA binding model, we also found that AHR/ARNT heterodimer does not participate in cooperative binding, as binding of the second dimer appears to be prohibited by occupation of the first. This property was similar regardless of the composition of the amino acids at positions 14 and 15. Finally, reporter assays revealed that the Q14Q15 substitutions severely compromised the ability of the AHR to activate gene expression despite appropriate nuclear localization. The present results revealed that DNA binding stability of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer is an important requirement for its transactivation capabilities and that this stability is governed, in part, by residues R14 and R15 that lie within the basic region of the AHR.

Androgen receptor (AR) expression in AR-negative prostate cancer cells results in differential effects of DHT and IGF-I on proliferation and AR activity between localized and metastatic tumors

BACKGROUND

Two features of the progression from organ-confined to metastatic prostate cancer are dysregulation of the androgen receptor (AR) and a decrease in insulin-like growth factor-type-I receptor (IGF-IR) expression. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of changes in IGF-IR expression on AR activity.

METHODS

M12 human prostate cells were stably transfected with an AR expression construct to produce the M12-AR parental (PAR) cell line. PAR cells were implanted orthotopically into nude mice and M12-AR primary (PRI) cell lines were derived from intraprostatic tumors and metastatic cell lines (MET) were derived from PRI tumors that had metastasized to diaphragm or lung.

RESULTS

Tumor formation in the prostate by PAR cells was decreased significantly compared to M12 controls. PAR, PRI, and MET cells expressed equivalent amounts of AR protein; however, IGF-IR expression was increased significantly in PAR and PRI cells. IGF-IR expression decreased in MET lines to the levels seen in M12 control cells. IGF-I significantly enhanced dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-stimulated, but not basal, AR transcriptional activity in PRI cells. In MET cells, IGF-I significantly suppressed DHT-stimulated transcriptional activity. In MET cells in which the IGF-IR was re-expressed from a retroviral vector, the effects of DHT and IGF-I on AR activity were similar to those seen in PRI cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the changes in IGF-IR expression exhibited by this model of metastatic progression cause significant alterations in AR signaling and suggest that this interaction may be an important aspect of the changes seen in AR function in disease progression in vivo.

Prostate-tumor targeting of gene expression by lentiviral vectors containing elements of the probasin promoter

BACKGROUND

Lentiviruses are retroviruses that can infect and stably integrate into the chromatin of non-dividing cells. The purpose of this study was to determine whether lentiviral vectors containing the probasin (PB) promoter displayed prostate-specific, androgen-regulated, and persistent gene expression.

METHODS

Three lentiviral-PB promoter/enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-reporter vectors together with a control lentiviral-CMV-EGFP, were tested by microscopy and flowcytometry for expression of EGFP after infection of human prostate cancer cells (LNCaP, PC-3, PC-3(hAR), and Du145 cells) and non-prostate cells (COS-1, HeLa, HeLa(hAR), and MCF-7 cells).

RESULTS

All cells infected in vitro with lentiviral-CMV vectors expressed EGFP, whereas with lentiviral-PB vectors (the most potent being Lv-ARR(2)PB), reporter expression was only observed in LNCaP cells with a small amount seen in androgen-independent PC-3 cells. Stable or transient transfection of androgen receptor only raised EGFP expression in prostate-derived cell lines, but did not change tumor specificity. With Lv-ARR(2)PB infected LNCaP cells, androgens regulated EGFP both in vitro and in vivo. After intra-tumor injection of this vector, EGFP expression was observed in LNCaP tumors, but not in A-549 lung or CaKi-2 kidney tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Lv-ARR(2)PB may be an ideal vector for prostate-tumor targeting and for persistent, hormone-enhanced expression of a therapeutic gene to treat slow growing prostate tumors.

Modulation of androgen receptor-dependent transcription by resveratrol and genistein in prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates the biological responses of androgens in the prostate gland. This study focuses on the chemopreventive agents, resveratrol and genistein, on AR-mediated transcription in prostate cancer cells.

RESULTS

We found that resveratrol and genistein activated AR-driven gene expression at low concentrations, whereas they repressed the AR-dependent reporter gene activity at high concentrations. We determined that resveratrol and genistein induced AR-driven gene expression by activating the Raf-MEK-ERK kinase pathway. The ERK1 kinase phosphorylated the AR on multiple sites in vitro, but this phosphorylation event did not contribute to the resveratrol-induced AR transactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro and in vivo studies have indicated that resveratrol and genistein are promising chemopreventive agents. Given the clear evidence that AR pathways are involved in the development and progression of prostate cancer, these data showed that the ability to modulate AR function would contribute the observed chemopreventive activity of resveratrol and genistein.

Identification and characterization of a prostate-specific androgen-independent protein-binding site in the probasin promoter

In this study we investigated the combination of transcription factors and proteins binding to the proximal part of the prostate-specific probasin (PB) promoter. Using DNaseI in vitro footprinting, several protected regions were identified on the proximal PB promoter (nucleotides -286 to +28 relative to the transcription start site) when nuclear extracts from LNCaP, a human prostate cancer cell line, were used. Four of the protected areas were observed only when LNCaP nuclear extracts treated with synthetic androgen (10 nM R1881) were used. Two other regions, referred to as FPI and FPII, showed protection regardless of the presence or absence of androgen. When DNaseI footprinting was done using other prostate and non-prostate nuclear extracts, protection of the FPII region was only seen in prostate cell lines. These androgen-independent regions were further tested for tissue and binding specificity using the electrophoretic mobility-shift assay. Eight complexes formed with the FPI probe while four complexes were observed with the FPII probe on incubation with the tested nuclear extracts. Methylation protection assays reveal that prostate cancer cell lines yield slightly different protection patterns for some of the protein complexes formed with non-prostate-derived cell lines, suggesting the presence of prostate-enriched or -exclusive proteins. Site-directed mutagenesis of the protected nucleotides within FPII resulted in a significant reduction in expression from the PB promoter. Identification of proteins binding to the FPII region revealed the participation of nuclear factor I (NF-I) or a closely related protein, although other unknown proteins are also involved. Defining the DNA and protein components that dictate prostate-specific expression of the PB promoter in an androgen-independent manner would provide a strong basis for the design and development of a gene therapy for systemic treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer.

RanBPM, a nuclear protein that interacts with and regulates transcriptional activity of androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that has an essential role in the normal growth, development, and maintenance of the prostate gland. The AR is part of a large family of steroid receptors that also includes the glucocorticoid, progesterone, and mineralocorticoid receptors. Steroid receptor family members share significant homology at their DNA and ligand-binding domains. However, these receptors exhibit a high degree of sequence variability at their NH(2)-terminal domain, which suggests the possibility of receptor-specific interactions with co-regulator proteins. Transcriptional co-regulators that interact with the AR may have a role in defining AR activity and may be involved in directing AR-specific responses. Here we have identified Ran-binding protein in the microtubule-organizing center (RanBPM) to be a novel AR-interacting protein by yeast two-hybrid assay and have confirmed this interaction by glutathione S-transferase- and His-tagged pull-down assays. In addition, transient overexpression of RanBPM in prostate cancer cell lines resulted in enhanced AR activity in a ligand-dependent fashion. Glucocorticoid receptor activity was also enhanced when RanBPM was overexpressed, whereas estrogen receptor activity remained unchanged. These data demonstrate that RanBPM interacts with steroid receptors to selectively modify their activity.

Identification of an androgen-dependent enhancer within the prostate stem cell antigen gene

Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) is emerging as an important diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer. Previous studies indicated that PSCA was directly regulated by androgens, but the mechanism has not been elucidated. Here we describe the identification of a compact cell-specific and androgen-responsive enhancer between 2.7 and 3 kb upstream of the transcription start site. The enhancer functions autonomously when positioned immediately adjacent to a minimal promoter. Deoxyribonuclease I footprinting analysis with recombinant androgen receptor (AR) reveals that the enhancer contains two AR binding sites at one end. Mutational analysis of the AR binding sites revealed the importance of the higher affinity one. The dissociation constant of the high affinity binding site (androgen response element I) was determined to be approximately 87 nM. The remainder of the enhancer contains elements that function synergistically with the AR. We discuss the structural organization of the PSCA enhancer and compare it with that found in other AR-regulated genes.

Molecular biology of the androgen receptor

Androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the steroid hormone receptor family of molecules. AR primarily is responsible for mediating the physiologic effects of androgens by binding to specific DNA sequences that influence transcription of androgen-responsive genes. The three-dimensional structure of the AR ligand-binding domain has shown it is similar to other steroid hormone receptors and that ligand binding alters the protein conformation to allow binding of coactivator molecules that amplify the hormone signal and mediate transcriptional initiation. However, AR also undergoes intramolecular interactions that regulate its interactions with coactivators and influence its activity. A large number of naturally occurring mutations of the human AR gene have provided important information about AR molecular structure and intermolecular interactions. AR is also a critical mediator of prostate cancer promotion, conferring growth signals to prostate cancer cells throughout the natural history of the disease. Late-stage prostate cancer, unresponsive to hormonal deprivation, sustains AR signaling through a diverse array of molecular strategies. Variations in the AR gene may also confer genetic predisposition to prostate cancer development and severity. Further understanding of AR action and new strategies to interfere with AR signaling hold promise for improving prostate cancer therapy.

The androgen receptor can promote beta-catenin nuclear translocation independently of adenomatous polyposis coli

We provide evidence that the androgen receptor (AR) can promote nuclear translocation of beta-catenin in LNCaP and PC3 prostate cancer cells. Using AR-expressing cells (LNCaP) and non-AR-expressing cells (PC3) we showed by time course cell fractionation that the AR can shuttle beta-catenin into the nucleus when exposed to exogenous androgen. Cells exposed to the synthetic androgen, R1881, show distinct, punctate, nuclear co-localization of the AR and beta-catenin. We further showed that the AR does not interact with adenomatous polyposis coli or glycogen synthase kinase-3beta and, therefore, conclude that androgen-mediated transport of beta-catenin occurs through a distinct pathway. The minimal necessary components of the AR and beta-catenin required for binding nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin nuclear import appears to be the DNA/ligand binding regions and the Armadillo repeats of beta-catenin. We also employed a novel DNA binding assay to illustrate that beta-catenin has the capacity to bind to the probasin promoter in an AR-dependent manner. The physiological relevance of AR-mediated transport of beta-catenin and binding to an AR promoter appeared to be a substantial increase in AR transcriptional reporter activity. AR-mediated import represents a novel mode of nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin.

Invited review: sex-based differences in gene expression

Certain diseases are more prevalent among women than men. The reasons for this increased prevalence are unknown, but there could be a genetic basis. Increased expression of X-linked genes in females, protective effects of Y-linked genes in males, or sex-limited gene expression that is developmentally or hormonally regulated could all account for these differences. Analysis of individuals with and without genetic sex reversal provides a means for distinguishing between genetic and hormonal causes. This can be complemented by genetic linkage and gene expression profiling to aid in the identification of candidate genes.

Repression of androgen-regulated gene expression by dominant negative androgen receptors

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription activator responsible for male sexual development. In order to specifically inhibit the AR pathway, dominant negative ARs were constructed by inactivation of the major transactivation domains of the wild type AR and fusing this mutant (AR122) to the Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) repressor domain and/or histone deacetylase (HDAC1). The HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 protein was the most successful dominant negative AR, capable of repressing the wild type AR ninefold when co-expressed at a 1:1 plasmid ratio. A maximal repression of 41-fold was achieved when HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 was cotransfected with the wild type AR at a 4:1 plasmid ratio. HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 repressed transcription in a ligand-dependent manner since it inhibited a constitutively active AR mutant (AR5) only in the presence of agonists. High concentrations of partial agonists such as RU486, cyproterone acetate, and estradiol were also capable of triggering repression by HDAC1-KRAB-AR122. The potent dominant negative AR proteins might prove useful tools to inhibit AR function in vitro and in vivo.

New androgen response elements in the murine pem promoter mediate selective transactivation

The Pem homeobox transcription factor is expressed under androgen control in the testis and epididymis. It is also transcribed in the ovary, muscle, and placenta. The mouse Pem gene promoter was cloned and sequenced. It was analyzed in transactivation tests using CV-1 and PC-3 cells expressing the AR and found to be strongly stimulated by androgens. EMSAs and mutational analysis of the Pem promoter allowed the identification of two functional androgen response elements named ARE-1 and ARE-2. They both differed from the consensus semipalindromic steroid response element and exhibited characteristics of direct repeats of the TGTTCT half-site. Unlike the steroid response element, both Pem androgen response elements were selectively responsive to androgen stimulation. Specific mutations in the left half-site of Pem ARE-1 and ARE-2, but not of the steroid response element, were still compatible with AR binding in the EMSA. In addition, Pem ARE-1, but not ARE-2 or the steroid response element, showed some flexibility with regard to spacing between half-sites. These results strongly suggest that the AR interacts differently with direct repeats than with inverted repeats, potentially leading to cis element-driven selective properties. Thus, the existence of several classes of DNA response elements might be an essential feature of differential androgen regulation.

Chimeric PSA enhancers exhibit augmented activity in prostate cancer gene therapy vectors

The native PSA enhancer and promoter confer prostate-specific expression when inserted into adenovirus vectors capable of efficient in vivo gene delivery, although the transcriptional activity is low. By exploiting properties of the natural PSA control regions, we have improved the activity and specificity of the prostate-specific PSA enhancer for gene therapy and imaging applications. Previous studies have established that androgen receptor (AR) molecules bind cooperatively to AREs in the PSA enhancer core (-4326 to -3935) and act synergistically with AR bound to the proximal promoter to regulate transcriptional output. To exploit the synergistic nature of AR action we generated chimeric enhancer constructs by (1) insertion of four tandem copies of the proximal AREI element; (2) duplication of enhancer core; or (3) removal of intervening sequences (-3744 to -2855) between the enhancer and promoter. By comparing to the baseline construct, PSE, containing the PSA enhancer (-5322 to -2855) fused to the proximal promoter (-541 to +12), the three most efficacious chimeric constructs, PSE-BA (insertion of ARE4), PSE-BC (duplication of core) and PSE-BAC (insertion of core and ARE4), are 7.3-, 18.9-, and 9.4-fold higher, respectively. These chimeric PSA enhancer constructs are highly androgen inducible and retain a high degree of tissue discriminatory capability. Initial biochemical studies reveal that the augmented activity of the chimeric constructs in vivo correlates with their ability to recruit AR and critical co-activators in vitro. The enhanced activity, inducibility and specificity of the chimeric constructs are retained in an adenoviral vector (Ad-PSE-BC-luc). Systemic administration of Ad-PSE-BC-luc into SCID mice harboring the LAPC-9 human prostate cancer xenografts shows that this prostate specific vector retained tissue discriminatory capability compared with a comparable cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter driven vector.